Selective Breeding

Why is it okay to kick a Beta male in the balls on TV or in the movies?

The cocky Beta who gets his comeuppance with a swift kick to the nuts from a Strong Independent Woman® archetype has been standard fare for comic relief in action-adventure movies for some time now. Why is this socially acceptable? In the most recent Avengers movie Starlord (Chriss Pratt) gets kneed in the groin when he – the lovable, humorous Beta male archetype – tries to reconnect with his ‘true love’ interest Gamora after she’d been killed in the prior movie. This is just one example, but so long as the character is definably a Beta (in comparison to definably Alpha male archetypes in the story) permission is granted to ridicule him by exploiting his greatest weakness; a kick in the nuts.

We see the attacking of men’s genitals as humorous because it conveys and confirms sexual selection cues. Only Beta men deserve to have their balls kicked as a confirmation of their sexual selection status. Attacking a woman sexually is tantamount to rape, so flipping the gender script in this instance is a non-starter with comparisons in the movies. In fact, men even speaking critically of women’s bodies is regularly used as an illustration of misogyny or presented as the typical abuse women must endure from body-shaming chauvinist men.

 If we look at the popular fiction of this era – the Avengers or Star Wars franchises for example – we can see the death of conventional masculinity played out in the erasure of Alpha male characters. Tony Stark (Iron Man), Steve Rodgers (Captain America), Han Solo, etc. are systematically removed from popular consciousness. Even Thor is a has-been alcoholic who’ll now be replaced by his female incarnation in the next “Thor” movie. And this is the model of masculinity that’s left for us. Laughable Beta males and Strong Independent Woman® who step up to fill the vacuum of powerful male characters that’s been written for them to fill.

Manspreading

Earlier this year I read a story about a staged protest by a Russian feminist girl who poured what we were told was a mixture of bleach and water onto the crotches of men who were manspreading on a subway train. With a critical eye you can sort of tell this was staged. Guys were sitting by themselves with no one else in an adjoining seat and she’d go up to them and pour a water bottle on their crotches. I’ve see similar protests before, and if you look at the linked video here today you can see how this ‘man spreading revenge’ fantasy plays out, even in commercials. 

Recently there was another woman who’s won some sort of design award for a chair she designed to discourage men from naturally spreading their legs when they sit. And, of course, she designed a companion chair that encourages women to spread their own legs. The male chair forces men to sit like a “proper lady” should. While some men try to defend this posture as the natural way guys just sit, I read a lot of commentary about how men’s sitting posture is an arrogant display of toxic masculinity because men were somehow taught to, or feel they must, take up more space when seated. Women’s frustration is ostensibly about the space men take up with their posture, and the more militant women presume it’s a behavior grounded in some unconscious sexism. “I’m more important as a man so I need to take up space.”

But manspreading isn’t about space. It’s about a display of genitals. Men with legs spread is a natural, often subconscious, Alpha posture. It’s a hindbrain signaling of confidence in men. Now, before you write me off here, think about this; if women’s primary concern was about men taking up space, then why attack a man’s genitals to force him to close it up? Why not simply ask him to close up a bit? Why is pouring water (bleach) on his crotch an acceptable punishment? Why is a hit to the balls a reflexive retaliation?

Women’s existential fear is having their Hypergamous filters bypassed by a clever Beta male impersonating an Alpha, breeding with him, and thereby saddled for a lifetime of support with the child of his inferior seed. Women’s evolved sensitivity to this filter extends to subconscious cues men display in their posture. Ergo, a man ‘spreading’ is perceived by a woman’s hindbrain as a false signal of Alpha by a Beta male. This triggers the existential fear response, thus attacking his manhood is doing all of womankind a favor by humiliating him for his attempt to deceive women’s filters.

I’m sure there’ll be some women (and their ‘allies’) who’ll think this is a stretch, but then, why is it acceptable to kick a man in the nuts when he’s spreading? Why is it that Starlord gets kicked in the balls and we laugh? Because a Beta male tried to pass himself off as an Alpha and retaliation was due. If a guy like Jason Mamoa was sitting spread-legged on a bus it would serve as an arousal cue for most women. Alpha status recognition is an automatic subconscious subroutine, fine tuned over millennia of evolution, in women. Women’s subconscious awareness instinctively reads SMV status and prompts behavior accordingly.

She Doesn’t Want Your Shitty Last Name

Or your shitty genetics for that matter. Patrilinear surnames are a symbolic stamp of ownership for men. They give a name to his genetics – a surname is associated with a specific genetic line. A man’s legacy is his genes and those genes need an identifier. One of the more controversial topics I debate online is the refusal of men’s surname by their wives. Women keeping their last names or hyphenating them in marriage is now a common sign of their independent spirit. Marriage is only acceptable to the Strong Independent Woman® when it looks more like an egalitarian business arrangement rather than a complementary pairing of a man and a woman who understand (and accept) the nature of their own gender. Traditional marriage looks too much like “ownership” for feminist wives and nümale husbands.

Blue Pill conditioned men are far more likely to be okay with their wives’ decision to keep her name, hyphenate it, or even take her name. After all, it’s the progressive thing to do and most believe on some level of consciousness that his accepting her independence in this way will make him more appreciated by her. The truth is this: his acquiescing to her in this way only reinforces what her hindbrain has already confirmed – she’s paired with a Beta male who wouldn’t give an afterthought to insisting his genetics bear his name. He confirms the low quality of his genetics to her hindbrain.

There are a lot of convenient social conventions that come along with a woman’s insistence on keeping her surname. Just like the excuse of men “taking up space” warrants terms like “manspreading”, women and nümales will appeal to pragmatism:

“She’s a doctor, lawyer, soon-to-be-famous-person and she need to maintain her identity for public relations reasons. Otherwise she’d totally take my last name dude.”

“I don’t want her to have a crummy last name like ‘Butts’ or something.”

“Taking a man’s last name is an antiquated symbol of patriarchal ownership of women. Haven’t we evolved past this yet? Are you so insecure in your masculinity that you’ll insist on her taking your name?”

These are a few of the cover stories, but the latent purpose is the same; women’s hindbrains must hedge their Hypergamous bets with men they know are Beta before pretending to commit to a lifetime of breeding and parental investment with them. For a woman marrying a man whom her subconscious acknowledges as Alpha, not assuming his name isn’t an afterthought to her. Women paired with a man who is a confirmed Alpha will often say “I didn’t want children, but I wanted to have his babies.”

The Alpha man inspires her to breed for his benefit.

We’re getting into sexy sons theory here, but the idea is that a significantly high SMV male can inspire women to become submissive/supportive wives and mothers. See my essay on Alpha Widows for more about this.

A woman in a good Hypergamous pairing accepts – desires – his authority, but also his genes. She doesn’t just want children, she wants his children. This then is signified (codified?) in his name passing on to her and their children. Even in ostensibly egalitarian marriages the kids generally retain the name of the male who fathered them (unless single-mom throws useful step-dad a bone and the kids change their name to his). Human beings are innately tribalistic (sorry Jordan). This tribalism is expressed in Selective Breeding practices extending from the personal to the social.

In 2019, and in the reproductive aftermath of the Sexual Revolution, these tribal distinctions are now left to women to determine in a confusing global sexual marketplace. Men’s innate drive for paternal certainty falls away in this environment. The existential fear and frustration that manifests from that drive still persists in men, but the practice of it gives way to women being the primary influencers in selective breeding – and how it will or won’t be expressed. It’s now a common practice for a woman to change the surname of children of a genetic ‘asshole’ father to that of the adoptive step-dad-who-stepped-up. Or the noble Promise Keeper son and holy protector of his single mom (and by extension all of womankind) who changes his last name to something else. 

But why? Why bother to go to that trouble if names are unimportant? If paternity doesn’t matter anyway, why go to the trouble of changing a name?

What Happens When She’s the One Who’s Out of Options?

As I mentioned, women’s existential fear is pairing herself with a Beta male who, through guile and deceptions, convinced her he’s an Alpha. But what happens when that woman runs out of options in her  Epiphany Phase? What happens when she’s forced to settle on the good-enough Beta (the guy Sheryl Sandberg assured women “nothing’s sexier”) because she can’t lock down the Alpha whose babies she wants to have?

She can continue searching indefinitely. The social conventions established by the Feminine Imperative convinces women that their sexual market value (SMV) is unending and imperishable. Those conventions also combine with others that shame men for being so infantile in preferring women who are ‘younger, hotter, tighter’. This shaming gets extended to convincing Beta men they should “align their dating strategies” to prefer mature women who “now have their heads on straight”. The idea that an older woman is more mature and therefore ought to be considered more desirable by men is conveniently positioned in women’s Epiphany Phase – so is the Myth of the Biological Clock.

Or she can settle for the less-than-ideal Beta male she’d never have opted for in her Party Years. Women have various psychological and sociological mechanisms in place to help them rationalize this settling on a Beta in Waiting.

  • Plan B: There’s always a fallback guy. Generally this is one Beta for another, better positioned Beta though. If one were “alpha” he’d already be the Plan A. (Be the A Guy). It’s important to note that if the Plan B Beta eventually ‘alphas up’ in some perceivable way, this generally throws a woman into a psychological conflict.
  • She convinces herself that ‘settling’ is really who she is in that moment. Most women genuinely believe in their Epiphany Phase rationales. Most would probably pass a polygraph test if you asked them if they genuinely felt the way they do about their decisions during this time of their lives. However, Hypergamy and its fundamental rules don’t change for women even when they believe something new about themselves. And often enough that ‘genuine’ belief is motivated by their subconscious understanding about their state n life as a result of their mating strategy.

Make Rules for Betas – Break Rules for Alphas

This is a fundamental understanding for Red Pill awareness. It’s one of the easiest indicators men can use to determine a woman’s interest in them, or her subconscious understanding of your status as a man. Is she making more rules for you to obey, more hoops for you to jump through in order to qualify for her ‘love’ (i.e. sexual access)?  She probably sees you as a Beta. Is she breaking her rules, the rules she believes she needs to follow in her new (Epiphany) phase of life, in order to get into situations where she can facilitate sex with you? Is she putting off responsibilities in order to enjoy herself with you? She probably sees you as Alpha.

This rule-setting or breaking is a basic litmus test for genuine desire. Women’s hindbrains grasp this  too. If a woman is setting rules for a man, her subconscious understands that he’s predominantly Beta. Because she needs to set rules, because it seems like logic to refuse his surname (another rule) and because he accepts these rules – even encourages them in himself and other men – his status is confirmed as a Beta. Only a Beta would need rules. Only a Beta would comply with those rules.

I should add that this is the basis of all transactional relationships. Jump through hoop (obey rule), get sex. An Alpha, by nature, would have options to replace a woman who made rules for him. Furthermore, it wouldn’t occur to a woman to issue rules with an Alpha man whose babies she wants to have. Hypergamy can’t afford to issue rules to Alpha men.

The Inner War

If women’s existential fear is being tricked into reproducing with a Beta male, then forcing herself to settle on a suboptimal man must inspire an inner conflict in her. There are lots of controversial self-help books published by women on both sides of this conflict. Some argue for women to accept a Beta guy and just make the best of it, others (especially religious books) argue that a woman should never compromise herself and wait for the best man (the ‘soulmate’ husband God has preordained for her) to present himself to her. There are more than a few Purple Pill “relationship experts” who cater to this demographic of women, and they do very well marketing new age magic and cutesy aphorisms to resolve this inner war.

I characterize this war as a conversation between a woman’s Id and her Ego. 

The Epiphany Phase forces her sensualism-seeking, ‘hawt’, short-term sexual (breeding) opportunism to come to terms with the necessity of her long-term security needs. Alpha Fucks (her Id) wars with Beta Bucks (her Ego) in her head – and all with the urgency of knowing that her SMV is decaying to the point where she must either take action or convincingly rationalize why she doesn’t need to take action. Her Ego knows her SMV is in decline and long-term security / parenting / family is becoming less and less available to her. But her Id still wants what it wants; ‘hawt’ sex with ‘hawt’ guys. And she’s still ‘hawt’ too – the feminine-primary world says it all the time “Never Settle Gurl!” – she ‘deserves’ only the best.

Thus, the conversation leads to varying degrees of compromise to outright self-delusions prompted by outside influences (i.e. social media). Plan B is a compromise. Refusing his last name is a compromise (or hedging of her Hypergamous bets). Making rules for, and endlessly testing, a Beta to assuage the Hypergamous doubt (“is he the best I can do?”) is a compromise.

And Choreplay, that’s just sexual filibustering.

Today, the new fascination with ‘Poly’ or ‘open relationships’ is also one more methodology women are using to make a compromise between the Alpha Fucks her Id needs and the Beta Bucks her Ego knows is necessary for her future security and happiness. “Alternative relationship strategy” is the latest euphemism for Poly, but it really distills down to a means for women to find a way to balance the Hypergamous equation. She’ll marry the Beta, but it should necessarily mean she has to have sex with him. Poly relationships are a compromise.

Ideally women would love to give themselves to a worthy man. To follow his plan for their lives,…and she’d like to feel the kind of attraction to him that would inspire the trust that he would do so for her and her children’s benefit. 

“I wanted to have his babies.” — this is Hypergamy balancing Alpha Seed with Beta Need perfectly.

Today though, women wait too long. They believe the lies of their own Blue Pill, that their SMV is never depleted. They don’t look for this balance anymore. They don’t even expect to find it; one man is for a same night lay, the other is boyfriend material

Published by Rollo Tomassi

Author of The Rational Male and The Rational Male, Preventive Medicine

Leave a Reply

  Subscribe  
Notify of
Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

kfg
Pant suit wearing masculinized modern woman complains that gender neutral school uniforms are an attack on women:

“Simplify, always simplify” — Some Dead White Male Or Other

EhIntellect
Guest
EhIntellect
Offline

“Aside from the rambling, non-sensical assassination on my character…”

Why’s she so defensive?

NB, guys. Never explain or defend your freewill intention choices. The moment you do it’s a sentiment of toxic doubt.

One’s intent decides the outcome.

Do you authentically. Fuck the peanut gallery.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Offline

“I’ve decided after much soul-searching to change my pronouns to “LORD / MY LORD”” — Rollo

Amateur. Mine is “My Lord and Master (with a curtsy).”

And Holy crap, I think ADJ just came close to setting a world record for memetastic public meltdown.

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline
Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline

Shit. I meant to post that video in Field Reports.

Pardon me.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

I’m considering identifying as an AC-130J — Pronouns “Aiee!” and “Your Obliterativeness”.
Certainly a work in progress.

Yollo Comanche
Guest
Yollo Comanche
Offline

@kfg

All the better reason to protect what we inherited from our ancestors instead. But that would require “racism”.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Offline

“All the better reason to protect what we inherited from our ancestors instead.”

That’s what Hawaiians have told me.

Yollo Comanche
Guest
Yollo Comanche
Offline

I have a feeling we’d do better than they could.

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline

comment image

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline

In other news –

Yollo Comanche
Guest
Yollo Comanche
Offline
Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Felicity Huffman sentenced…”

The name “Macy ” does not appear in that story. How odd.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

kfg
That’s what Hawaiians have told me.

The Hawaiians failed to create a force of extraordinary magnitude.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Offline

That would explain the lack of gratitude.

Yollo Comanche
Guest
Yollo Comanche
Offline

Sure has been a quiet Saturday huh?

Cosmopolitan Gangland.

Let “our” powers combine.

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline
wahoo Mcdaniels
Guest

Hey Rollo, apology accepted!

Sentient
Guest
Sentient
Offline

ADJ pondering suing Rollo for not liking him…

https://mobile.twitter.com/beachmuscles/status/1172541724364853248

SJF
Guest
SJF
Offline

I got free time to ride my bike, sit around, go farming, go hunting next weekend. And listen to all the bullshit going on in the manosphere. This weekend was just a shit show. In the manosphere. Last year the manosphere was coordinated. This year? Balkanized. It is not a surprise based on my experience with red pill tribal behavior. Things will come and go with red pill tribal behavior and must be cultivated. So my latest take on things: Content providers will carry on. Rollo, Rich Cooper, Rian Stone, Jon form Modern Life Dating, Shawn T. Smith good stuff.… Read more »

SJF
Guest
SJF
Offline

And none of the fight and balkanization of the manosphere should be construed as everyman not having plenty-of-sex with wives, girlfriends or one night stands or fuck buddies. It is not about that only. But it is about that. It’s not an ideology. It is a praxeology on how to get that done. In the most efficient way possible. But also in a healthy way for all. The thing is, this MRP thing is actually a thing to benefit all: Yourself, the wife and the kids. It’s what works. Do what works best for all. It’s possible and workable. If… Read more »

kfg
Guest
kfg
Offline

“ADJ pondering suing Rollo for not liking him…”

Does he understand that that would be a public affair, that all court documents are public, that his whole little operation would be laid bare?

He might want to go on YouTube and watch the videos following the Vic Migongna defamation/tortious interference lawsuit. He might particularly note that the tortious interference claim was dismissed.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Offline

“I firmly believe Ms. Richardson, in fact, I know in my heart that if you would have made different decisions in this case, Annabelle would be here today,” he said before sentencing . . .”choices before birth, during birth and after show a grotesque disregard for life.””

The judge isn’t so sure that the jury got this one right.

Yollo Comanche
Guest
Yollo Comanche
Offline

Footage from the 21con.

Rich is the guy behind the counter.

rugby11
Guest
rugby11
Offline

The fight Continues
https://www.instagram.com/p/B1ILWUyB7EK/

SJB
Guest
SJB
Offline

@Rollo: no apology is needed; 2018 was excellent.

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline
Prof. Woland
Guest
Prof. Woland
Offline

I think it was Lenin who said, “You can’t have an omelette without freezing a few eggs”. Until men organize in a way that is effective and carries out our interests, be prepared to put up with these petty insults and humiliations. And it will probably get worse. The best thing that could happen would be to put together a war chest and fund counter images using a sustained mass media campaign and return it with the spirit whence it came from. It would be very easy to do. Even advertisements run at 3 am on channel z would be… Read more »

theasdgamer
Guest

Great video for grandfathers:

lol

GrandBaby Gamer prefers snuggling with GrandDad more than with GrandMother. Probably has more to do with security than with comfort.

“It’s about babies all the way down.”

Once you’re a grandfather, the point drives home even more than when you become a father.

wahoo Mcdaniels
Guest

Is it that the woman’s Id wins out over her Ego because her Super Ego was never developed (as in the princess syndrome) or possibly removed by feminine primary social order?

wahoo Mcdaniels
Guest

Men are having the new socially acceptable “Super Ego” foisted on them from every angle. When this new status quo finally hits home like a kick in the nuts,if his ego was underdeveloped from the start he is now “zeroed out” and stands at great risk to his “Super Ego” killing what is left of him. This is the jumping off point.

wahoo Mcdaniels
Guest

“The superego incorporates the values and morals of society which are learned from one’s parents and others. It develops around the age of 3 – 5 during the phallic stage of psychosexual development.”

https://www.simplypsychology.org/psyche.html

McLeod, S. A. (2016, Feb 05). Id, ego and superego. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/psyche.html

Yollo Comanche
Guest
Yollo Comanche
Offline

@Wahoo

The pussies who play politics do so by reassuring the pussies of every culture that the future will be a multicultural one.

It’s what looks best because nobody wants to nuke anyone. Therefore they go, alright bitches make you’re enclaves, but don’t start evading taxes!! Pink-dicks!!!!

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

@wahoo

This just in: Sigmund Freud is still dead.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Prof. Worland
I think it was Lenin who said, “You can’t have an omelette without freezing a few eggs”.

Was it Nadezhda Lenin who said that?

wahoo Mcdaniels
Guest

@AR,Sigmund Freud’s labels for the parts of the psych live on and Rollo Tomassi isn’t dead yet. If you haven’t yet read the OP this is an excerpt. “I characterize this war as a conversation between a woman’s Id and her Ego. The Epiphany Phase forces her sensualism-seeking, ‘hawt’, short-term sexual (breeding) opportunism to come to terms with the necessity of her long-term security needs. Alpha Fucks (her Id) wars with Beta Bucks (her Ego) in her head – and all with the urgency of knowing that her SMV is decaying to the point where she must either take action… Read more »

wahoo Mcdaniels
Guest

@Yollo,speaking of pussies that play politics.

rugby11
Guest
rugby11
Offline

Why Do Women Lie to Men ? (From your youtube episode)
https://according2anna.wordpress.com/2012/03/05/closer-an-attempt-at-analysis/

theasdgamer
Guest
theasdgamer
Offline

Why Do Women Lie to Men ?

Because truth doesn’t matter.

liz
Guest
liz
Offline

Was it Lenin who said that?

Definitely Stalin.
Too much Stalin, and you have to freeze the eggs.

wahoo Mcdaniels
Guest

Prof. Woland is a little off,the quote is “you have to break a few eggs to make an omelet.” And the best approach is from the ground up,”don’t wish it was easier,make yourself stronger”.

When you freeze eggs the shell breaks and they make better over easy than omelet’s as the yolk thaws last.

Yollo Comanche
Guest
Yollo Comanche
Offline

Freud and Jung were the First Leisure Suit Larry’s.

All the shit about setting the strong man and the thinking man against one another came from them.

rugby11
Guest
rugby11
Offline

SJF
https://www.claremont.org/crb/article/are-the-kids-altright/

Thought this was a good read an the 30 under

Yollo Comanche
Guest
Yollo Comanche
Offline

All the “Revenge of the Nerds” transvaluation, Robert Bly, let’s be Indians type hippy bullshit came from them.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Offline

“All the shit about setting the strong man and the thinking man against one another came from them.” Odysseus was almost excluded from the Trojan expedition because he was a smart man, not a strong man. The strong men didn’t trust him. He beat them out of things by “clever tricks,” rather than by manly combat. Usually left out of the telling of the tale these days it’s an important part of the framing of the story as it was Odysseus the trickster who won the war after the strong men had failed for 10 years. “All the “Revenge of… Read more »

rugby11
Guest
rugby11
Offline
Yollo Comanche
Guest
Yollo Comanche
Offline

@kfg

“The English were into that before Freud set up his “nervous disorders” practice.”

Oh I know! And the faggoty Catholics before him. But Jung was the guy to run into the woods.

Yollo Comanche
Guest
Yollo Comanche
Offline

@wahoo

Don’t unperson the messenger.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Offline

Rousseau didn’t read Jung. Jung read Rousseau.

People started running off into the woods, setting up experimental voluntary labor/free love communes and taking up Transcendentalism before Freud was even born.

Jung was influenced by it and acted as a force multiplier on it.

Yollo Comanche
Guest
Yollo Comanche
Offline

@kfg

I hear these geeks are a dime a dozen.

I’m looking for the guy supplying the dimes.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Offline

@Yollo Comanche:

Sell ’em to the circus, what the heck.

SJF
Guest
SJF
Offline

@Rugby “Thought this was a good read on the 30 and under” Thanks man. That was an excellent review of Bronze Age Pervert’s Bronze Age Mindset book by an excellent reviewer/writer from a trad con college who gave it balanced, fair treatment. (Michael Anton from Hillsdale College). It was so good it saves me from the time reading another book. Nice. It wasn’t so much regarding the 30 and under, who he alleges is glomming onto it because of need. I think the concepts are pretty age independent. And it is all about denouncing “equalism”. Which is allegedly not a… Read more »

SJF
Guest
SJF
Offline

Oh, and I did watch the movie Closer the other day that Rollo and Pat Campbell talked about.

Great acting, no actually great writing and production. Awful, wicked behavior by the characters. Cute watching with red pill lenses.

Enough to inspire a million little comments about intersexual behavior. Counterpoise to Blue Valentine.

rugby11
Guest
rugby11
Offline

“Men want a girl who looks like a boy. They want to protect her but she must be a survivor. And she must come…like a train…but with…elegance.”
― Patrick Marber, Closer

“Pleasure and self destruction…The perfect poison.”

“What’s so great about the truth? Try lying for a change, it’s the currency of the world.”

“I know who you are. I love you. I love everything about you that hurts.”

SJF
Guest
SJF
Offline

Rugby

The Closer movie is not instructional. It is not aspirational. It is merely Thomas Hardy-like melodrama to watch.

It’s Machiavellian pathology porn. Fun to watch. Don’t emulate. The principles/characters are all losers. They are derisive to others in their lives. That is no way to live.

I can understand where you can see what is going on there, because that is how you grew up.

Move on.

liz
Guest
liz
Offline

“Too much Stalin, and you have to freeze the eggs.”
You’re off sammich duty and you’re now chief comedy bish
No pressure ..

Under pressure, I always crack but I’ll see what I can hatch up.
Talk is cheep, as they say….

liz
Guest
liz
Offline

Why did KJU execute his uncle using an anti-aircraft gun?
He thought he was a flight risk.

Why did the redhead cross the road?
She was soul searching

ba dum bum
Thankyou, please remember to tip the wait staff. I’m here every wednesday. You have been warned.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Motivational story of the day. Legs are hard to carry when they are not really attached to anything.a

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-49737335

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

wahoo McDaniels @AR,Sigmund Freud’s labels for the parts of the psych live on and Rollo Tomassi isn’t dead yet. Eh. Trofim Lysenko’s ideas lived on for too long in the USSR, resulting in agricultural failures into the 1960’s. Longevity of an idea is not proof of validity. I don’t agree with Rollo regarding the validity of Freud, but it’s his site and I’m not going to argue with him about it. But I do disagree for two reasons. First: It’s lousy at predictions. This should be no surprise given the microscopic patient base Sigmund used to create his delusions fantasies… Read more »

fleezer
Guest
fleezer
Offline

““ADJ pondering suing Rollo for not liking him…”

pondering?? lol

it takes ten minutes to type a complaint…

he might not have the filing fee though

if you’re gonna invoke the power of the court, don’t fucking tell the defendants

just have them served

wahoo Mcdaniels
Guest

Anonymous Writer, the main reason to use Freud’s terminology is that those actually concerned are speaking the same language.

Maybe you can get everybody on board with your new terminology,I highly doubt it. The plus side is you win the pedantic bitch award.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

fleezer
pondering?? lol

Probably “posturing” is more appropriate.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Plus it is completely reusable.
“ADJ posturing [something something]” can be recycled apparently for years to come.

wahoo Mcdaniels
Guest

“Over here you’ve got “pre action protocol” Over here we have the same,basically it is a civil case not criminal so the plaintiff files his claim with the court the court gets his money and sets a date for mediation( the two parties meet in the mediation room with a mediator to hash it out pretrial),the defendant is notified-served of the date to appear. If the defendant fails to appear the judgment goes in favor of the plaintiff. If on the other hand after mediation there is no agreement the defendant can file a counterclaim against the plaintiff for a… Read more »

wahoo Mcdaniels
Guest

Two important things here,the counterclaim is filed for a fraction of the original claim,less than 10% because the case is already open on the books.Second the counterclaimant gets to choose the actual date,however inconvenient this may be for the opposition, tough titties bitch.

Dr. No
Guest
Dr. No
Offline

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xQF7RDSjQYQ

Interesting bit of rubbish

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline

No problem with people taking advantage of thirsty, stupid folks.

foxguy
Guest
foxguy
Offline

Was watching the American Greed episode on the College Admissions scandal, was struck with how corrupt UMC/Upper Class is, as well as the whole Ivy League college process also is. Multiple levels of straight up corruption.

I’m not one to push morality but without any moral fiber as a whole this society/culture is cooked.

having a bad day
Guest
having a bad day
Offline

@Culum had a big long comment all typed up, but didn’t send it bc it didn’t quite address the issue that was pinging me with your overall attitude/comments… it was an elusive little f*ker to recognize…lol… but the penny dropped yesterday, and now i can address it properly… basically, (like kfg points out) any collapse is most likely going to be localized… and, hopefully, not drawn out… sooo, your basic need for situational awareness (which is always handy…lol) and snap shooting/reaction drills (mostly from concealed carry) as the most important skillzz to have is NOT going to be at the… Read more »

Nitpic
Guest
Nitpic
Offline

Interesting how you seem to assume that if a woman refuses to take a man´s name, the children will carry hers and not his. This seems so counterintuitive to me. If she wants to keep her name, no harm done (The Spanish do that, for exapmple as a cultural norm), but the kids will have the father´s name.

Yollo Comanche
Guest
Yollo Comanche
Offline

@Blax

It’s even better when they do all the work.

having a bad day
Guest
having a bad day
Offline

@Culum

like i mentioned before, this knowledge is ALWAYS handy…lol… but not kidding… started to be a big push (like with CPR) at the national level after the sandy hook op…

https://www.bleedingcontrol.org/

good luck!

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

wahoo McDaniel Anonymous Writer, the main reason to use Freud’s terminology is that those actually concerned are speaking the same language. Comrade the main reason to use Lysenko’s terminology is so that actual agronomists are speaking the same language… Maybe you can get everybody on board with your new terminology,I highly doubt it. I see your point. How dare anyone use a term like “Epiphany phase” or “alpha-fucks, beta bucks” or “hindbrain’ here at The Rational Male, where no one’s ever encountered such talk before. Never! The plus side is you win the pedantic bitch award. Your butthurt is strong.… Read more »

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Nitpic Interesting how you seem to assume that if a woman refuses to take a man´s name, the children will carry hers and not his. This seems so counterintuitive to me. Lots of things are counter intuitive. Yet they are still real. If she wants to keep her name, no harm done (The Spanish do that, for exapmple as a cultural norm), but the kids will have the father´s name. If she wants to retain her father’s name there’s a lot of mental baggage behind that decision; Rollo already spelled that out. This site is generally US-centric with a lot… Read more »

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline

Starting a fire in the middle of the woods ( or downtown ) when it’s 15 degrees is a DHV for reelz.

theasdgamer
Guest

“Starting a fire in the middle of the woods ( or downtown ) when it’s 15 degrees is a DHV for reelz.”

…and you get fifteen extra points and a chance at the boner round if you use two boy scouts to do it.

DCTRNGLCVS
Guest
DCTRNGLCVS
Offline

Women from hispanic (Spain and South America) countries take their husband’s last name as a second last name, but instead of simply hyphenating the thing, they use the genitive particle “de”, which, being genitive, indicate posession; sons, on the other hand, use their father last name as their first last name, and their mother last name as a second last name. Everything ends up looking like this.

Father: Juan Antonio Rodríguez Márquez.
Mother: María José Pérez de Rodríguez.
Son: Antonio José Rodríguez Pérez.

This has been pretty much a standard practice for hundreds of years.

Dr. No
Guest
Dr. No
Offline

. . . And if you can’t land your Alpha, girls
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/09/20/patriots-release-antonio-brown-after-rape-allegations.html
. . . just shoot him

trackback

[…] Rational Male: Selective Breeding (2019 September […]

Dr. No
Guest
Dr. No
Offline

Too bad this guy doesn’t look like DiCaprio
https://www.ptleader.com/stories/ten-years-of-peace-for-victims-of-stalking-case,65267
there wouldn’t be a problem

%d bloggers like this: