Male Authority – Be a “Man”

How women and a feminine-primary social order control men by reserving the title of “manhood” for men who comply with female primacy.

In the Manosphere we often discuss the dynamic of men holding the burden of 100% responsibility yet are conferred 0% authority when it comes to intersexual relationships. This didn’t used to be the case. There was a kind of default authority imbued in men that was part of simply being a male under the old social contract. A lot of western societies still presumes this is the case in fact. It’s one reason popular culture presumes such a thing as ‘male privilege‘ exists today. They may even have a case with respect to the Old Set of Books; being a “man” inferred that a male had some degree of power, authority and decision making capacity over the course his life would take, as well as the lives of any women or children or extended family members who were dependent upon him being a “man”.

Responsibility is what defines men to this day, but the utility in this being hammered home into the psyches of men has become something the Feminine Imperative has found very useful in consolidating power in the hands of women. We’re ceaselessly told that responsibility is something men need to assume, but under the old set of books the incentive for a man assuming that responsibility came with a commensurate portion of authority (power). That was what used to earn a man the title of “manhood”; men were expected to possess the competency to produce surplus resources, enough to ensure the security and survival of his immediate and extended family, and then his tribe, his clan, his nation, etc. We still call this “being a productive member of society”, but now the incentives of a default authority that made assuming that responsibility a reasonable exchange have been stripped away along with all the grounding that a family name or tribal identity used to mean to men. In their place is all the same expectation of responsibility, but not even the pretense of male authority that stems from it.

In prior posts I’ve defined power thusly:

Real Power is the degree to which a person has control over their own circumstances. Real Power is the degree to which we control the directions of our lives.

How many men today have real power; power to direct the course of their own lives? As we commit to various aspects of life, family, business, the military, a woman, we incrementally exchange power for responsibility. Wealth often enforces will, but unless we can be one of the moneyed outliers in life there is no true authority granted to men now in exchange for that responsibility. A man who would even presume to use an authority that might still be implied in these exchanges is labeled a tyrant; a vestige of a Patriarchy that’s now painted as a net negative to society. And that’s just the societal level. In a legal sense that man has no authority with respect to his power over virtually every aspect of his interactions with women or a wife. A gynocentric social order’s prime directive has been to remove all vested male authority and by extension almost all power the man has to dierct the course of his own life.

There are numerous ways a feminine-primary social order removes the teeth from male authority today. First and foremost is the social pretense of blank-slate equalism. A default presumption that men and women are coequal agents in every aspect – physical, emotional, psychological, intellectual – is the cover story necessary to remove an authority that was based on the conventional differences between the sexes. To the blank-slate equalist gender is a social construct, but gender is only the starting point for a social constructionist belief set. Social constructionism is a necessary foundation upon which blank-slate equalism is built, but ultimately it’s a means of control. By denying each sex its innate differences social constructionism denies men their innate advantages and strengths. Once this became the normalized social convention it was a simple step to remove male authority.

In order to destroy that authority it was necessary to destroy men’s grounding in the identity of their own gender. The first step was to deliberately confuse men about the evolved nature of conventional masculinity. Thus, masculinity became subjective. Never has the idea of being a ‘man’ more reviled, obfuscated, blurred, ridiculed, demonized and loathed by men themselves. Wait for the “masculinity is toxic” articles to follow the next mass shooting incident. The worst shame, the worst clichéd vitriol, will come from male authors stepping up to apologize to women on behalf of all men for the violent ignorance of what they think is a learned toxic masculinity. It’s these Vichy men who’ve been taught that gender is a social construct, so there’s really no definitive answer to what makes a man a Man. These ‘men’ who’ve been conditioned in their feminine-primary upbringing who are so confused or gender-loathing with respect to masculinity that they feel compelled to believe they speak for all of ‘mankind’ when they apologize for all of us.

Blank-Slate Equals

But none of this works unless men and women are blank-slate equals. One reason a guy like James Damore is hammered down and erased with such zealotry for suggesting men and women are inherently different is because so much of gynocentrism rides on the social belief in the blank-slate. What’s offensive about it isn’t the idea that men and women might be prone to innately different strengths or weaknesses so much as it’s about the entire system scaffolded by the falsity of equalism.

You see, the confusion, the subjectification of masculinity has a design underneath it. This confusion is a means of control; a means of not just denying men authority, but to systematically remove anything inherently male from the whole system. I’ve detailed this removing the man in prior essays so I wont dig into it here, but it’s a means of control in an age when men are expected to know their utility and their role in women’s sexual and life strategies.

As we progress towards a social order based on a consolidated gynocracy it becomes more important that men not only be confused about masculinity, but also that men be dispersed and isolated. Men who would challenge this social order must be made into suspects and the suspicious of an “outdated masculinity” – a masculinity that pretends to be about innate authority based on evolved gender differences. Male Spaces must be outlawed, ostensibly for the misogyny they will surely lead to, but actually because men gathered together as men is a threat to a gynocentric power base. This is why the Manosphere and events like the 21 Conventions are so egregious to the feminine-primary social order; they connect men and their experiences about women. So men must be taught to be suspicious of each other. While masculinity might be loathed or confused, men gathered together can only mean homosexuality – because what other purpose could men exclusively gather for other than to fuck one another?

This is where the facade of blank-slate equalism conveniently slips when it suits the purpose of gynocentrism. Men and women can be innately different, but only on the occasions when innate differences would prove that men are violent, abusive, potential rapists, sex addicts or incorrigible homosexuals. On those occasions, the occasions when it serves the Feminine Imperative, women will gladly agree that Boys will be Boys and men are naturally beasts. Through this caveat in the blank-slate society men can be justifiably hated for being men if only because some nebulous male-chauvinist ‘society’ taught them to be so. So the clichés and the old lies get perpetuated because only a belief in the ‘masculinity-is-toxic’ narrative can justify teaching the next generation of boys to hate their own sex and sustain a gynocracy.

Men must be taught to hate themselves for their maleness. Thus, a form of institutionalized gaslighting of men about the nature of masculinity became necessary, and it is primarily men who sustain it. When men are conditioned to be both gender loathing and suspicious of the worst aspects of ‘masculinity’ in other men the result is a self-perpetuating cycle of policing ones thoughts while policing the thoughts of other men. There’s a default belief that this policing is part of identifying with the feminine that will make these Vichy Males more attractive to women of the gynocracy.

But what makes a man a Man in this social order?

As we’ve moved from a blank-slate basis of gender to an ambiguous, subjective definition of what a man is the Feminine Imperative has found a utility in assigning the title of ‘manhood’ to whichever man best exemplifies this utility to the gynocentric social order. In other words, the more a man meets the shifting needs of women the likelier he is to merit the title of being a “man” or a “real man”. In fact we hear this last one all the time in the memes that serve the Feminine Imperative. A “real man” does [insert whatever serves women’s long term sexual strategy] and Betas gleefully retweet it to prove their quality. In our feminine-correct paradigm, the authority that was inherent in masculinity which allowed men to declare what qualities make a ‘man’ has been casually assumed by women to be tossed around as whim and necessity makes convenient.

In Rites of Passage I elaborated on how, to an older conventional masculinity, Manhood was something merited and conferred onto a boy by his adult male peers. There were rites of passage, rituals, tests and qualifiers that transitioned boys into the world of men. This was a part of his grounding in a tribal belonging that used to at least somewhat direct his purpose in life. To be a ‘Man’ was to be a part of a sum whole – E Pluribus Unum, out of many, one. It was the collective of men who conferred manhood onto another. How this actually played out in real life and the integrity of that collective was always particular to the character of the tribe, but prior to the rise of gynocentrism conferring manhood on an individual was something unique to masculinity.

Today, the Feminine Imperative’s efforts to disempower and subdue men means destroying the legitimacy of the tribal aspects of all this. As I mentioned earlier, men gathering together, and pretending to authority is something threatening to a gynocentric power structure. Destroying, shaming, ridiculing, etc. the whole of men, keeping them dispersed and isolated, meant usurping the authority men had in assigning ‘manhood’ to one another.

Aspects of the old masculine social order, including men’s natural inclinations towards duty and honor amongst each other, have always been dynamics that could be turned to the uses of the Feminine Imperative.

From The Honor System:

Man Up or Shut Up – The Male Catch 22

One of the primary way’s Honor is used against men is in the feminized perpetuation of traditionally masculine expectations when it’s convenient, while simultaneously expecting egalitarian gender parity when it’s convenient.

For the past 60 years feminization has built in the perfect Catch 22 social convention for anything masculine; The expectation to assume the responsibilities of being a man (Man Up) while at the same time denigrating asserting masculinity as a positive (Shut Up). What ever aspect of maleness that serves the feminine purpose is a man’s masculine responsibility, yet any aspect that disagrees with feminine primacy is labeled Patriarchy and Misogyny.

Essentially, this convention keeps beta males in a perpetual state of chasing their own tails. Over the course of a lifetime they’re conditioned to believe that they’re cursed with masculinity (Patriarchy) yet are still responsible to ‘Man Up’ when it suits a feminine imperative. So it’s therefore unsurprising to see that half the men in western society believe women dominate the world (male powerlessness) while at the same time women complain of a lingering Patriarchy (female powerlessness) or at least sentiments of it. This is the Catch 22 writ large. The guy who does in fact Man Up is a chauvinist, misogynist, patriarch, but he still needs to man up when it’s convenient to meet the needs of a female imperative.

In a gynocentric social order both the concept of honor and masculine responsibility is set by whatever is ‘correct’ for feminine utility. If that means only ‘real men‘ do something to satisfy women’s imperatives, it implies that men who don’t are ‘false men’. Those men are outside the tribe called ‘men’ as well as being unacceptable for reproduction, intimacy and love.

It also implies that only women have the authority to bestow ‘Manhood’ on men, and then only for performing specific behaviors or believing correct beliefs as set by womankind. It’s as if women uniquely hold the ‘medal of manhood‘ to give exclusively to men who can qualify for her wanton needs. The authority men used to claim innate legitimacy of in the past is now only legitimate when a woman wields it.

Men need to retake this authority and own it as is their birthright once again. I realize that sounds kind of LARPy but it’s the best way I can put it. One thing the Red Pill has made men aware of is the social machinations of the Feminine Imperative. Amongst Traditional Conservative ‘thought leaders’ a popular idea is that we find ourselves in the intersexual conditions we do today because men have dropped the ball. Men have shirked their manly responsibilities and women are the way they are because not enough men care to correct women’s behaviors. This argument fails on two counts. The first is that it presumes women bear no moral or behavioral agency and as such cannot be blamed for their own participation in our social condition. This presumption, I should add, is actually indicative of exactly the manipulation of honor I mentioned above.

And secondly, more importantly, it presumes men hold an authority they simply don’t have. Even claiming masculine authority would smack of misogyny today. Churchy, moralists pretend that men have a headship / authority that our gynocentric social order empirically contradicts. To paraphrase the MGTOWs, your headship counts for shit when all a woman has to do is call 911 and police will physically remove what you think is your authority from the family home, no questions asked. This is a result of the Duluth Model of Feminism which I’ll be covering in an upcoming part of this series on Male Authority, but the short version is feminism’s design is to remove men, maleness, masculinity from our social consciousness and this begins and ends with which gender has an enforceable authority.

There are guys who’ll challenge this idea of female authority. Red Pill thought emphasizes men disconnecting their sense of identity from a female-correct paradigm. In my own work I’ve stressed that the most important aspect of Red Pill awareness is men making themselves their Mental Point of Origin and this necessitates a realigning of oneself as his first priority. It’s easy to make declarations about how your self-worth begins and ends with you and that no woman can influence that image, and in a way that seems liberating. Like you’re taking at least that much authority back for yourself. But it’s another thing entirely to wrestle with a social order that’s now founded on a consolidated female-primary authority.

In the coming series I’ll get more into this question as well as what men can do to take back the authority of assigning manhood. Thanks for reading, more to come.

Published by Rollo Tomassi

Author of The Rational Male and The Rational Male, Preventive Medicine

350 comments on “Male Authority – Be a “Man”

  1. As I once wrote about it on TRP, “good” translates into “You serve my imperatives” and “bad” is used when “you (only) serve your own”. It is never defined in terms of what is good or bad for you but only in the way it impacts me.

    Avoid walking into frame traps.

  2. Hello again – dropping by after being away hanging with hung Chads down in Florida…

    Our sensei likes to chortle now and then “ I hate being right all the time.”

    I do not claim such certitude for myself but my Magic 8 Ball has had a pretty good track record. Apropos of this week’s topic, see this article. I told you all this was going to happen. All of it:

    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/12/the-sex-recession/573949/

    The death of dating. Celebrating celibacy as a virtue. Putting off relationships because you’re too busy, meaning too self absorbed, to even get off the couch. Marriage, family and birth rates cratering everywhere, even in sexy Sweden.

    To the point where nearly a fifth of today’s Hip Kidz have been taught to believe that ANY man cold approaching a woman for ANYTHING – even to get a Starbucks – is per se assaultive and creepy.

    And they don’t know how to talk to each other. Because they are being taught it’s not allowed to talk to each other.

    Next in high schools and college campuses: a return to the old Bob Jones University rules. Total sex segregation. Fraternization prohibited. Hand holding and dating an expulsion offense.

    The sexual devolution, if you will.

    And it is thus that the Earth, a living organism, cures the fever we’ve given it by us dying out and thereby shaking us off like a case of fleas, or a flu virus. (The George Carlin Postulate)

  3. wow – another great post but all I can think is MGTOW –

    {Blank-Slate Equals – a Man in this social order – Rites of Passage – The Honor System – Man Up or Shut Up – The Male Catch 22 – Avoid walking into frame traps… women uniquely hold the ‘medal of manhood‘…}

    Yah I get it – and thank you – all I can say is MGTOW… stop focusing on the externals – take care of yourself – be your own point of origin – work on yourself, for yourself – let what comes to you, be yours. MGTOW.

  4. What is defined as ‘good’ or ‘bad’ by society is thus which benefits women themselves and not you as a man. To even suggest something is ‘good’ because it benefits you, even if it doesn’t them isn’t understood by women and confusion is apparent to them. The irony of this occuring is due to their innate solipsm, so their is no point pointing it out because it reeks of appeals to reason.

    Fortunately, if you just ‘do’ what benefits you, it shows strength and that’s what is rewarded by women, good or bad, it doesn’t matter to them. It’s not all doom and gloom. It’s just knowing how to approach the situation correctly. It’s definitely a tough time for a man but we do have power – power in not giving it away to easily.

  5. @Rollo: kind of a downer ending here 😛

    “But it’s another thing entirely to wrestle with a social order that’s now founded on a consolidated female-primary authority.”

    Cue Blax and Sentient saying that LTRs are not for everyone and “burden”. Still a sobering thought:

    “To paraphrase the MGTOWs, your headship counts for shit when all a woman has to do is call 911 and police will physically remove what you think is your authority from the family home, no questions asked.”

    Although I imagine to get there in the first place the dude has failed quite a few shit tests in spectacular fashion.

  6. Cue Blax and Sentient saying that LTRs are not for everyone and “burden”.

    Even assuming no LTR, it behooves us to develop game. We cannot (nor should we want to) escape some sort of burden. And, if we develop some skill at game, burden becomes play.

    Mating is a dance and a game and we are creatures who mate. And we have lineage and want to propagate our lineage, so it’s to our advantage to take reasonable care to ensure that our offspring are reared properly, because proper rearing gives us a reproductive advantage. So, if we don’t want to become Darwin Award winners, I don’t see how we can avoid LTRs. And LTRs aren’t guaranteed to become misery-inducing traps depending on our skill at game.

    But we men often start the game plugged in to the Matrix. So, the first step is to unplug. Hence, Rollo’s mission. And Blax’s. And RP fathers, generally.

  7. Two comments:

    1) I absolutely do believe us men have a big responsiblity for letting all this happen and yes for not ‘correcting’ female behaviour. Women are just like little girls, and when they get older their hpergamy instincts kick in. If men tolerate their shitty behaviour and not call them out or shut them down their behaviour will just get worse. So fuck yes, we need to be the rock and call and correct bad behaviouir in our women.

    2) Totally right about how women define being a ‘man’ but also as I fully absorb RP I find it utterly entertaining to actively reject the feminist definnition of ‘manning up’ by making myself the mental point of orgin. And guess what …. when you do it, first they give you the dagger eyes, then their panties get moist.

    Its actually a GREAT time to be a man if you know what the fuck you are doing and whats really going on in the world.

  8. Was watching an episode of My Three Sons…old men were playing cards…one was saying semi-BP crap…one was saying RP stuff…a teenage boy liked ONE girl and was trying to get her to notice him…

    …mixture of RP and BP messages…you have to filter…observe from other boys/men what works and what doesn’t and talk with other men…

  9. In my Latin dance classes teachers have started using gender neutral language to describe what had always been the male – female dynamic.

    Now those roles are referred to as “leader and follower” and in some instances guys are starting to virtue signal and become “followers” .

    But as we’ve talked about so often here’s when a guy can dance and carries himself with confidence women will abandon the “leader” role and immediately revert back to “follower”

    When I first started it was guys and girls…

  10. I am by no means a MGTOW fanboy. Im in a LTR that I can get out of pretty easily of 4 years thanking my lucky stars. From what I read in this blog it seems that is the answer until shit changes. I just always think Im giving up or throwing in the towel if I go that route. But I cant help but think every time I see a Rollo article its blinking in my face go MGTOW you idiot. Thoughts? Thanks.

  11. Strange picture; the image, for me, connected to that blockhead Charlie Brown who has the privilege of always trying yet never impacting the ball.

  12. It’s easy to make declarations about how your self-worth begins and ends with you and that no woman can influence that image, and in a way that seems liberating.

    Somehow this quote leads to…

    But I cant help but think every time I see a Rollo article its blinking in my face go MGTOW you idiot.

    disconnect because fear and/or lack of confidence

    In the coming series I’ll get more into this question as well as what men can do to take back the authority of assigning manhood. Thanks for reading, more to come.

    The following is necessary, I believe, but it may not be sufficient. You have to be willing to be The Bad Person ™ because you don’t let society decide what you will do in regards to your sexual/social life. And you have to have game skill, because the deck is stacked against you. And you can’t be plugged in to The Matrix.

  13. @777

    “Thoughts” You will never be a pure MGTOW no matter how hard you try as you have the capacity to relate and do with women. Rollos writing does the same for me , as I feel every good man ( as I define man ) should find a cave today and hole up. Still these are interesting times to be alive and I wouldn’t want to miss any of the entertainment value that this mass of confused people has to offer. The trick is not to let on that I am amused at them rather amused with them.

    Having you own metal point of origin is in a sense MGTOW even in an LTR and is required to make it functional, imo. In that respect you are on the right track just using the wrong label.

  14. “A gynocentric social order’s prime directive has been to remove all vested male authority and by extension almost all power the man has to dierct the course of his own life.”

    It’s not so much gynocentric as oligarcic. Women by nature subjugate themselves to TPTB. Women in power aren’t really directing the course of their own lives; they serve the dehumanized system.

    “Real Power is the degree to which we control the directions of our lives.”

    Real power is how closely bound our freewill is to freedom. How broadly one chooses to exercise freewill determines their freedom. Hence the intense pressure to offer security for potential. It reduces personal responsibility to choose life’s direction, allowing other forces to act on the individual. When one refuses the security, they’re branded non-compliant, isolated socially, and in worst cases, lawfare rains down. It’s that important that you comply that the government jealously reserves the right to kill for non-crimes if you do not.

    So, regular guy gives up freewill and reduces his freedom. Its just easier that way. Buffers work that way, “sin” as a personal inhibitor works that way too. Pedestalizing women works that way. Placing something physical or mentally conceptual that lies outside of one’s eternal nature is the beginning of losing your way.

    Understand this: You are not who you think you are, can not make freewill decisions publicly (you gotta be sneaky) and the TPTB have the upper hand:

    “The evidence that names are artificial persons can be found in the legal definition of the word name. Black’s Law Dictionary (6th edition) defines the word name using these exact words: “The designation of an individual person, or of a firm or corporation.” The word corporation is defined by the same law dictionary as, “An artificial person or legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of a state.” Based on the definitions in this paragraph, in law, a name can be a corporation which is an artificial person.”

    So understanding the above, femcentric social order isn’t about empowering women per se, but stripping men’s and women’s belief that they are anything but slaves, animals, plowhorses for a certain nebulous system to which you have no recourse. You do what you are told, are trainable.

    Knowing this doesn’t remove your public responsibility, but at least you’re cognizant that you’re getting fucked over. TPTB demand your soulless compliance, not your unreachable soul.

    Communism failed and will always as it OVERTLY turned men into a human harvest to be ground into wine for the state. Soviet Russia was BIG into state-sponsored gender egalitarianism before it was cool, btw.

    Western world covertly codifies the same dehumanizing nature into it’s laws, though gives lip service and to some or another extent more Hobson’s-choice decision making to the person, though it will always align to the state’s interests and end up slow-motion collapsing as man would rather die standing than live eternally on his knees. Even betas realize this when free to.

    “Men need to retake this authority and own it as is their birthright once again.”

    In time. It’s immediately given back to them after the shit hits the fan…i.e. Hurricane Katrina.

    Thank you Rollo. Very cool.

  15. It also implies that only women have the authority to bestow ‘Manhood’ on men, and then only for performing specific behaviors or believing correct beliefs as set by womankind.

    Watch pairings that are out and about on foot. See how many men are literally following women around or standing by waiting for them (perhaps holding some of her cargo). This may be most prevalent among the middle aged but I’m not sure. They are just the ones I’m more likely to see. If he is there or close behind when she stops or turns all is well. Good dog.

    If he has wandered off line and can’t immediately be found she is annoyed. She may chastise him. Bad dog.

    I see this a lot. Very sad story, I once was that man. It is a subset of Rollo’s essay and it always makes me think good dog, bad dog. She is thinking this also after a fashion, but probably could not or would not articulate it that way.

    It rarely manifests early in a relationship and is more common as time passes and she consolidates power. Look for it. Very instructive.

  16. Has anyone read “The Shore of Women” by Pamela Sargent?

    The blurb on Amazon claims “it’s perfect for readers of Margaret Atwood and Ursula K. Le Guin, but whoever wrote that failed to notice that (1) the novel depicts a world in which female supremacy is unquestioned and unquestionable, and (2) it’s a dystopia.

  17. Soviet Russia was BIG into state-sponsored gender egalitarianism before it was cool, btw.

    The soviets experimented with GE first, then they weaponized it against the West. I’m not sure that they were able to remove all of it from Russia or seriously contain its damage.

  18. Now THIS is the old Rollo.

    Women have no capacity to claim power on their own and their only power is ceded them by men. They count on men to enforce this paradigm.

    Most modern men have been socialized by modern women to protect modern women, and see that act (and by extension themselves) as noble. Like asking your barber if you need a haircut. They got tricked by a business.

    There is one pin holding the entire thing up however and women know it. The power they are given is revocable at any time, for any reason.

    This terrifies them to the core and a skillful cocksman turns that particular bolt when needed.

  19. “Real Power is the degree to which a person has control over their own circumstances. Real Power is the degree to which we control the directions of our lives.”

    That as a phrase sums up your choice in taking whatever happens to you and crafting a sculpted art form of yourself to the world we live in.

    walawala
    “When I first started it was guys and girls…” i see this with zouk and many other dances. Not sure if going along with it makes it acceptable but the dancing itself is the main reason why i am their.

  20. (perhaps holding some of her cargo)

    Had a plate, boss’s daughter. She went shopping with me one time, I bought a pair of shoes. We walked out, I was holding the bag, with my shoes in it. She took it from me… said it wasn’t right that i carry the bag… good girl that one.

  21. “Amongst Traditional Conservative ‘thought leaders’ a popular idea is that we find ourselves in the intersexual conditions we do today because men have dropped the ball.”

    this aligns with burden of performance. men made the world how it is, therefore we bear ultimate responsibility for everything that happens on our property. the idea of holding women accountable for maintaining/improving the complex systems we’ve engineered and built is laughable

    “Men have shirked their manly responsibilities and women are the way they are because not enough men care to correct women’s behaviors.”

    this aligns with men lead, women follow. i never blame the dog when it misbehaves in public. somebody wrote recently that it’s super easy to forget how many thots we wade through before we find one worthy of investment. the thots only repeat the behavior that is reinforced with positive feedback and it’s hard to ignore the constant positive feedback that the beta thirst provides. remove beta thirst, remove all kinds of nasty thot shit.

    “This argument fails on two counts.”

    fails is a strong word.

    “The first is that it presumes women bear no moral or behavioral agency and as such cannot be blamed for their own participation in our social condition. This presumption, I should add, is actually indicative of exactly the manipulation of honor I mentioned above.”

    my honor is in no way being manipulated and I find it hard to believe that men would ever actually attempt to hold women to that kind of standard. they are children. sheep. we all know this. children do not have agency under our system of law. and really not that long ago women didn’t either. we knew the score before. male property owners vote. and since there is almost no man in the united states who has allodial title to his property, it’s fitting that his vote doesn’t count for shit either.

    “And secondly, more importantly, it presumes men hold an authority they simply don’t have.”

    male authority is on obvious display every time I am alone in an elevator with a woman I don’t know.

    men have the ultimate authority. violence.

    “Even claiming masculine authority would smack of misogyny today.”

    we don’t have to claim it. it emanates from us. it’s undeniable. that’s why all the hissy fits.

    “Churchy, moralists pretend that men have a headship / authority that our gynocentric social order empirically contradicts. To paraphrase the MGTOWs, your headship counts for shit when all a woman has to do is call 911 and police will physically remove what you think is your authority from the family home, no questions asked.”

    her calling 911 is not removing your authority. it’s confirming that your authority was removed some time ago and you’re just now getting the message. in short, “you fucked up” if she thinks dialing those numbers is even an option

    “This is a result of the Duluth Model of Feminism which I’ll be covering in an upcoming part of this series on Male Authority, but the short version is feminism’s design is to remove men, maleness, masculinity from our social consciousness and this begins and ends with which gender has an enforceable authority.”

    i’ve had too many “feminists” help me out over the years to totally believe this. feminism is a mind virus. it is powerful, but not nearly powerful enough to overcome thousands of years of wiring up in the brutal real world

    fact: your bitch is your responsibility. just like that fucking pitbull/wolf puppy you got junior year in college

    treat them the same

  22. @ Rollo – awaiting the post on your ideas how men today can to take back authority as a male in a female led society. Because as you point out yourself, it is easy to say “make yourself your focal point’ but much harder to do today with respect to LTR’s in the West in 2018.

  23. “there is almost no man in the united states who has allodial title to his property, it’s fitting that his vote doesn’t count for shit either.”

    This is what I’m getting at.

    The second you look for answers outside of yourself you’re toast.

    And you end up thinking and writing “it is easy to say “make yourself your focal point’ but much harder to do today with respect to LTR’s in the West in 2018.”

    As if is true, real, permanent. And it is as long as you say it is.

    Feel that yoke settle on your shoulders and pull.

  24. good girl that one.

    Ah yes, plate. No leverage. Unable to consolidate power on her own, but clever enough to play that situation very well and stay viable.

  25. TIP #10
    HONOR THE HARD SKILLS

    As you probably recognize, most talents are not exclusively hard skills or soft skills, but rather a combination of the two. For example, think of a violinist’s precise finger placement to play a series of notes (a hard skill) and her ability to interpret the emotion of a song (a soft skill). Or a quarterback’s ability to deliver an accurate spiral (a hard skill) and his ability to swiftly read a defense (a soft skill).

    The point of this tip is simple: Prioritize the hard skills because in the long run they’re more important to your talent. At Spartak, the Moscow tennis club, there is a rule that young players must wait years before entering competitive tournaments. “Technique is everything,” said a coach, Larisa Preobrazhenskaya. “If you begin playing without technique it is big mistake.”

    You might be surprised to learn that many top performers place great importance on practicing the same skills they practiced as beginners. The cellist Yo-Yo Ma spends the first minutes of every practice playing single notes on his cello. The NFL quarterback Peyton Manning spends the first segment of every practice doing basic footwork drills—the kind they teach twelve-year-olds. These performers don’t say to themselves, “Hey, I’m one of the most talented people in the world—shouldn’t I be doing something more challenging?” They resist the temptation of complexity and work on the task of honing and maintaining their hard skills, because those form—quite literally—the foundation of everything else.

    One way to keep this idea in mind is to picture your talent as a big oak tree—a massive, thick trunk of hard skills with a towering canopy of flexible soft skills up above. First build the trunk. Then work on the branches.–from The Little Book of Talent by Daniel Coyle, a distillation of his book The Talent Code. It complements Robert Greene’s book Mastery.

  26. Im probably the rare kind here – theoretical incel. It means that i cant lose against women if i dont play game (in larger sense). I do not orbit, court or try to impress any girl and saves so much time. Is my life pathetic? Probably. Am i missing something? Perhaps. I have all the defense maneuvers thanks to rollo and red pill in general.

  27. Serendipity strikes. The current article at Dalrocks:

    https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2018/11/13/our-family-policy-is-designed-to-terrify-married-fathers/#comment-291074

    A paper is cited on the issue of joint custody after divorce that has good news/bad news. Joint custody tends to reduce suicide by men but not by women. :(Surprised face)

    The introduction of joint custody reforms reinforces the traditional division of labor within the family and gives men greater bargaining power over the intrahousehold allocation of resources.

    Worth a quick read.

  28. I do the same especially not try to impress (Not incel.) I bluntly ignore them at the gym. Thing is I have been lifting/dieting religiously for the last 4 years. Have a Chad Bod. The hottest girls at the gym look at me for attention and follow with the exercises I do. When I act like they dont exist it drives them absolute mad. Its an experiment I have done at the gym and its so fun. I get to lift and experience red pill at its realists.

  29. Lost Patrol at 8:09

    “Watch pairings that are out and about on foot. See how many men are literally following women around or standing by waiting for them (perhaps holding some of her cargo). This may be most prevalent among the middle aged but I’m not sure. They are just the ones I’m more likely to see. If he is there or close behind when she stops or turns all is well. Good dog.”

    I see it with teenagers. I have a second job where people come on dates. It has become somewhat more common to see high-school girls who have clearly asked a boy out and are leading the date. These boys are always taller than the girl and usually seem quite happy to be led around although I often get the impression the boys just don’t quite know what they’re supposed to be doing one way or the other.

    Another impression I get is that the least awkward couples who also seem to be having fun tend to each pay for their own ticket and clearly decided this well before they got to my window.

  30. Responsibility is the ket commodity in relational trade, and the balance sheet is whacked these days. It’s true not just in M/F but in society through politics and the victimhood olympics where strive for victim class. Victim means “I’m not responsible”, someone else did it to me and someone else is responsible for fixing it for me.

    To have a victim there must by definition be a persecutor too in M/F it’s obviously men by societal consensus, and that includes most men buying into it.

    But anyway, back to responsibility. A man taking on responsibility has about zero value in the eyes of women these days. It is expected. The action is in what responsibility the woman will have. Which most want to be zero as stated in the article.

    So will you hold yours accountable for her behavior? Will you insist she own her shit, have high standards, have boundaries and leave her if things aren’t to your liking while being a decent dependable guy? Herein lies there rare bird these days.

    I’d rather have cancer than oneitus ever again.

  31. Lost

    Well I’ll give you a little snippet from the “other side” then. Married, long term, kids, money etc…

    She has full leverage right?

    Nah.

    Wife has been frosty last few days. She want’s something and I don’t so she keeps bumping into my NO frame… Annoying? yes. Threatening? No.

    So I’ve been doing my thing and ignoring her pouting and trying to make an issue etc… Going out for drinks with a buddy. She is extra frosty now. But I’m cooler. catch her and give her a kiss… She is like “What’s that for?” I shrug. Then she tries to pull me back in, sad face, sad eyes “I miss my touches”… I kiss her again and leave. She’s frosty!

    Come home a few hours later, a few rounds in… she is in bed reading. I just say hey, wash up, come to bed turn out the light. Grab her and pull her over. She comes over but is fussing… Ignore her. Bite her shoulder and…Boom! All systems go…

    Rollo says Frame, other sites ZFG…

    You only get manipulated if you let them.

    leverage? nah.

    “Don’t throw me in the brier patch!”

  32. @ Sentient

    You’re stealing my moves.

    Prior to TRM, I do the same things but it take days to resolve her comfort tests. I’d fuck around with ignoring her, pinging her, ignoring her more and she attack dog wind up when I’d be half out the door on day 3. After her crying meltdown I’d finally get around to guiding her back to earth. I thought that was our lot. I didn’t like it but sex was plentiful through it all so compared to the faithful chumps I was o.k.

    My life is much, much easier, she’s happier and things make sense like they did when dating, when all we did was bang. Any and all tension is over in a few hours because I understand she’s not in control, wants leadership, won’t admit it overtly though rewards me in how she can, where it matters most when she passes through her emotional needs. It’s all I can expect from her.

    Expecting rational conversation about responsibility, authority and her part in all that is counterproductive.

    I’ve tried that on and off for 20 years. Fail. It’s a RP rookie mistake. Better going radio silence force her to respond to her imagination.

  33. Eh

    Yeah man was in quicksand like that for 10 years in the middle…

    “Rewards where can”

    Brought me a cocktail and snack before a big dinner…

  34. Bitchute is an alternative to YouTube, a non-SJW-censored alternative.
    PayPal just dropped Bitchute for mumble mumble reasons.

    The screw has tightened just a little bit..

  35. Will you insist she own her shit, have high standards, have boundaries and leave her if things aren’t to your liking while being a decent dependable guy?

    Well, I’d vet first to see if she has been well trained.. If she brings enough good qualities, I might train her myself. But I wouldn’t try to have a rational discussion with her about anything important. You shouldn’t expect a cat to behave like a dog.

  36. Oh this last nugget about male responsibility.

    A testing woman will wait until you are handling multiple things, responsible for others safety, essentially at your most distracted to pounce on you with her test.

    She doesn’t need to time it. As long as you look like you are in control, although shes irked, her hindbrain will not demand enough attention for her to test UNTIL you look like you can’t handle things smoothly. I didn’t say can’t handle things, it’s the smoothly part that keeps her at bay.

    Classic example: She’s miffed but quiet about it. You say “good enough, she’s respecting me.” You’ve to drive somewhere. The moment traffic is hectic and you tense up, say something in anger, in the slightest, she’ll start in on you. It never fails.

    So don’t fall for it. Commit to NOTHING, abort all plans, until she gets through, and I mean through and through, the whole wind up, crash and bang before you get behind the wheel with a testy woman.

    God forbid you try to discipline her from the driver’s seat. She knows you’re preoccupied so she knows that unless you pull over or drive it off a bridge you’re all wind.

    Like I said radio silence if you’re stuck there. Do not respond. Nods and unintelligible hm’s will do until your hands are free.

  37. @777

    “The hottest girls at the gym look at me for attention and follow with the exercises I do”.

    You don’t have the balls to approach them and risk getting rejected, so you settle for attention hot girls give you. It’s like how some guys will match hot girls on tinder, but will never message them because they’re too scared of “fucking it up” lol (they will however send you a screenshot of the hot chick they matched with tho).

  38. 777 just arrives, says some things he’s proud of and……

    master of the PUA universe blows in cuz being fat, zit faced, and Chad hating feelz threatened.

  39. “they will however send you a screenshot of the hot chick they matched with tho”

    10th graders still doing that?

  40. “10th graders still doing that?”

    Insecure 22 yr old guy I know. Who also goes to a gym with lot of hot girls in NYC and brags about girls checking him out at the gym just like @777. That’s how I knew.

  41. “10th graders still doing that?”

    Exactly. He’s 15.

    He knows everything about being a incel teenager, nothing about real life beyond 20.

    Fraud.

  42. and another signiture teenager tell….

    “where are your signature “good morning”???”

    Adults say good morning, good evening, good night without any sense of irony.

  43. I’ve been around ya know.

    It’s ok to be confused, it’s not to be willfully malicious. You are a bad person. You will be chewed up and spit out. It may not be today but it will happen.

    Ask Blax what happens to all-talk assholes.

  44. Headlines.

    Justin Bieber Won’t Return to Music Anytime Soon, He’s in a ‘Season of Self-Discovery.

    Justin Bieber is taking time off from his music while he figures out what he wants to do next.

    Some one needs to tell that faggot that you are ‘sposed to figure yourself out before you get with a girl. Or something won’t end well.

    YGBSM, you are doing everything wrong for her. It won’t take her long to figure that out and cash out.

    The insider adds that, “Justin is searching for his purpose right now.”

    “He’s thinking, ‘Hey, maybe it’s not music. Maybe there are other things I should be doing.’ So while he’s figuring it out, the last thing he needs is people asking him when he’s going back into the studio,” says the source.
    Beyond himself, the musician is hoping to make a positive mark on humanity.

    “He truly wants to make the world a better place, and he’s self-aware enough to know that some of his previous choices may not have accomplished that,” the source says. “So he’s working through it, which really should be applauded. It’s a very mature thing to do.”

    Good luck with that Justin…Thanks for being a microcosm of Blue Pill.

    Make a positive mark on humanity? Sounds pretty vague/abstract/unattractive without specifics.
    Times a wasting, figure yourself out or that lack of pre-nup with bit you quick.

  45. Rollo makes some great points here, a couple of thoughts.

    You cannot create your own reality as we are innately social creatures living in a social order. I’m so glad Rollo tried to cut this crap off at the pass as it’s way too common in the Red Pill world. What one can do is develop social intelligence and different social strategies to achieve one’s ends. Hint: Careful observation of “female power” reveals many glitches in the matrix an individual man can exploit for his gain. Better hint: Don’t spend so much time on meta analyses and politics. Your circumstances and actual occurring reality are much more relevant and important to your life and experience in this world.

    MGTOW, Jesus. I can’t believe that crap is still around. MGTOW is not “being your own mental point of origin” – that’s Red Pill. MGTOW is not Red Pill, it’s Beta rage and surrender and hiding out in the face of reality. Being Red Pilled is enough guys. Then it’s your job to create a life you actually want to live on your own terms. None of that implies banning women from your life. Try this out instead. Have women in your life only on terms you set. Sure, most women won’t participate – who fucking cares? I focus on the ones who play along. You’ll also notice that women respect a man who exerts this kind of control over his life and world. It feels quite different to them.

    But MGTOW? Being scared or girls or angry at them as a class, or avoiding them like they are poison? Nothing Red Pilled about that. Nor is it masculine or admirable as an aspect of your manhood. Put simply, being MGTOW means you are a failed man. Don’t get me wrong, I get it, for many betas, the rage that facing Red Pill realities brings on is nothing short of maddening. I get it, when you realize that you are essentially cannon fodder for our social order and that by being a “nice guy” you will never be respected, well, it brings on an existential crisis.

    The question is what do you do when you realize how our social order actually works?

    1. Climb to the fucking top, and stop whining about it. Men have always faced a burden of performance.

    2. Stop feeling sorry for yourself.

    3. Realize that the history of human civilization is filled with awful social setups for many classes of peoples. It’s just our turn to get fucked for a while. Put more simply, why not you? Why not us Why shouldn’t men face this crap? Your sense of injustice is childish and without any moral basis.

    Power is taken. Power is exercised without asking permission. Power is. You either exercise your will powerfully or you don’t. If you properly digest the Red Pill you will see how little agency you actually exercise in service to what you claim you are up to and about in this life. Your next choice is what will you do with that truth? Sadly, most men – and many men who show up here – retreat into LARPing online on sites like this, preening their anger and idiotic insights around as though the engagement is some kind of act of rebellion…

    Get this. They’ve won if all you do is play good boy in the real world and then rage online. ProTip: Calm the fuck down, focus your efforts on producing the reality you want and let the rest go. Adapt to your circumstances and win the day – not the world. Win your personal win, and forget all this campaigning.

    Perhaps many of you would gain by understanding this. The West has already been destroyed as a going entity and social order. We exist in its remnants, but most of our institutions and peoples are no longer Western, arising from Christendom and the Enlightenment. The Left won, and most of you don’t even realize it. Even Rollo here is always going on with some kind of wonderment about how the radical egalitarians so inculcated things like “social construction” into our reality, when it’s plain as day this all emanates from leftist political thought. Rollo seems to sneer at mere politics, lol, when in fact, it’s the politics that got us here.

    I come to this place after studying history and politics deeply for 40+ years. It’s clear as day. We’ve lost, they’ve won. Just as Rome took a while to actually collapse, so will we. But we are over, and just as a pickle will never become a cucumber again, there is no “going back” for us. So ride the decline and make the most of it, as this is what most human beings since the dawn of time have had to do.

  46. “Insecure 22 yr old guy I know.”

    Odd description.

    I never know the age of an loose acquaintance, if it’s not important. Why j needs to include it: it sounds to j more realistic, he’s hanging with adults. But he’s lives an teen incel fantasy, and writes what he reads.

    j makes shit up like it’s his job.

    Oh Good Morning at everyone. 🙂

  47. “We’ve lost, they’ve won.”

    It’s a pyrrhic victory and no more a decline than an ATM societal churn. There’s not much the individual can do other than one’s best, I mean that which serves you best, proximal to distal. Get involved or not, vote or not, it’s not all that important. Scrib has the benefit of future hope in his daughter and grandchild. He might not see the upswing, but his DNA might. That’s real, consequential and persisting.

    I agree. The verdict on the west is in. It is a judgement on all of us, over generations, per se. Things accelerate at the end though. Enjoy the moment because, who knows, you might get cut down in some California country bar.

    Nah, just kidding, that shit never happens.

  48. @eh

    “Why j needs to include it”

    How old are 10th graders? Aight well I personally know someone who is well above that age who still does this shit. I’ll send you the address to the gym he goes to and I’ll make sure to let him know this old dude on this anonymous forum wants to meet u cause he thinks u an imaginary nigga lol.

    “But he’s lives an teen incel fantasy, and writes what he reads.”

    http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/incredulous.gif

    Bro….is your goal here to try and “insult” me or make me lol? Cause your def succeeding if it’s the latter. If not then you suck at this shit homie.

  49. @Eh – Voting, lol, like if you think that’s gonna change things you are asleep. Our society has been morally corrupted from the top down via what Antonio Gramsci referred to as “the long march” through the West’s cultural institutions, and this began in the early 20th century. It took a long time for Marxists to overtake the academy, and they did so by empowering and creating victim groups. Without feminists, they would have not succeeded…

    Who thinks an election will change the left’s values utterly dominating the academy, the arts, our entertainment media and our new media? Wake up.

    Repeat after me, what our founders knew.

    1. Self-governing peoples must be personally virtuous. The Left is all about collective salvation, not personal responsibility or morality. In fact, now college kids are taught that it’s okay if their lives are a mess if they are activists, lol. Like they are collectively allowed to be garbage people that you wouldn’t hire if you ran a Burger King, but they are here to change the world. We are so far away from that common personal, uniquely WASPy, Christian, White, Western European ethic that informed our founding that one can’t even see it anymore. Some of you might laugh at this statement. Trust me, that only shows how ignorant you are.

    2. “Factionalism” (read as partisanship) will destroy our Republic. Allegiance to mere party is not sufficient to sustain our political order. Citizens were harkened to aspire to a “Republican spirit” meaning you acted politically in the best interests of the nation, not so “your side” could win.

    We actually didn’t fall into party politics right away. It was Martin Van Buren, a disgusting creature. who created the first “political machine” in the U.S, in which politics became formally about organizing a political party around divvying up the spoils. He created what still is the modern Democratic party. They abandoned all pretense of a Republican spirit and embraced factionalism. You can see where this leads.

    Saddest? Most of you know fuck-all about this and our actual political history. The more I study history, the more morose I become. We are so far from what our founders imagined.

    And you have to get this – socialism is the cause. Most of you don’t even know that socialism predates Marx, and was a more general concept. Marx introduced his idea of “scientific socialism”, using Hegel’s dialectic as a ground truth, as an axiom – which was idiocy, fyi, well after the term socialism was coined. Socialism as a term arises in like 1827 and was defined by what was lacking in classical liberalism.

    The entire field of sociology and German Historicism in political thought emanates along with the idea of socialism. It essentially stated that the classical liberal order’s focus on the individual’s rights was insufficient for organizing society in an equitable way, and also did not deliver the best outcomes. Socialism was essentially utilitarian based on the breezily stupid idea that govt should be able to do anything that delivered maximal benefit to all of society collectively.

    Our slide began 200 years ago. The intellectual edifice to destroy the West was already built and in force 100 years ago. We’ve been lied to about it forever, from the “Red Scares” to all the lies about McCarthy (he was 100% correct, everyone on his list was a Soviet spy or agent of influence, this was proved by the Venona decrypts and the brief opening of the KGB archives after the fall of the Soviet Union). In fact, the CommunistInternational, known as the ComIntern funded the communist party USA and most of the labor movement as it overtook it.

    But all of this is hidden from us because the left took over the academy first. They have essentially erased the history of the Left over the past 200 years. Most right wingers don’t even really understand it, and how complete it is.

    I’ll be really open here. I’ve known this for a while and as a consequence, I’ve seriously considered becoming part of a revolution. But what I realized is that we’d have to kill like maybe half the country. Or at least say the 30 million hard core leftists. I do not have the stomach for that slaughter, and then I realized revolution won’t solve the problem because the ideas of the Left are so widespread. The only possible solution is a separate nation, but that may not be possible.

    So yeah. I’m back to work now. Good luck to all of you out there Get the fuck off your computer and do something in the real world today that makes a difference to you and your life.

  50. For the leftist approved version of a manly man, look no further than this TV commercial running this Christmas gift buying season: https://www.ispot.tv/ad/dXIG/kay-jewelers-neil-lane-sons-permission.

    I very nearly vomited when I saw this for the first time. It pisses me off so much I turn off the TV or change the channel everytime I see it….and this has happened on ESPN alone (yeah, I know, they went full leftist converged years ago) 6 times in the last week.

    Nothing like being subtle in getting your message across, is there? Hate to say this, but unless something happens within the next generation (10-20 years) to change this, the West is doomed and will cease to exist.

  51. Very good comments on this post, @scribblerg, spot on analysis in your two posts. It’s one of the reasons I don’t vote, while I am not as educated as yourself about history , it’s plain as day the current system is very corrupt on both sides. I see people get caught up in this political LARPING , I myself was caught up in it earlier for years when I was younger.

    With regards to responsibility over women and their actions, the theory is easy, but the application is not so easy in the current environment. I give out the authority vibe with most girls I interact with and it turns many of them off, but the one’s it doesn’t turn off are compliant for the most part and are there for the taking if I want them. The only true key I find to being able to hold frame is hard ZFG and Mental Point of Origin, ZFG is becoming harder though, I’m not complaining but just recognizing this, the consequences are getting higher.

    Getting a lot of IOIs lately due to slight changes in my posture and demeanor. Yesterday at a group lunch a friend of mine noticed the waitress was rubbing her tits on my shoulder and arm and he saw me move away very deliberately, he was confused as to why. I told him T-Rex wants to hunt, not be handed something. Internally, I was thinking of the responsibility that comes with managing a woman and if it was in my interests with this broad, etc. It’s not any of the woman are evil MGTOW bullshit, but rather if they are worth my time and effort, some are some are not.

  52. Yeah, all y’all reading along here are just a bunch of ignorant fucks. And get this: you’re probably gonna die along with half the population when the revolution starts.

    Viva la revolution!!!!!

    The more I learn, the more 😠 angry and murderous my pronouncements become. It’s not because I can’t truly grasp and understand what I read, it’s because I’m the smartest mentally fucked person currently consuming oxygen in the planet, and I will remain so until I finally pass the fuck away in a puff of anger dust.

    Most of you won’t get this.

    😂😂😁😃😂

    😠😠😡😡😠😬

  53. Foxguy

    Knowing a lot of obscure shit that only serves to make you need medication isn’t the same as.being educated.

    Victim. ” right wing ” dudes shooting up people for.decades and doing all manner of shit, never ever mentioned or acknowledged. But muh Marxism.

    This shit ain’t smart. This which is a severe type of victim mentality for weak assed.people. The ‘ left ‘ is invisible, while everywhere at the same time😂.

    Solution? FINAl solution? Kill em all. Mail bombs. Shoot up a.school. Massacre.

    Smart, like Fredo.

  54. Blax trying way too hard as usual.

    Question for all following along here: Do you think Blax is in my head, or that I’m in his? I know the answer to that question, and I don’t need to present it in some overly arch, convoluted way in a desperate attempt to show that I’m smart, giggling. Blax, you lower your standing in this community every time you try and sort me out. But please carry on as I find it amusing.

  55. Sentient

    I think either WordPress is fucking up or Rollo’s attempt to stop hits and spammers is causing the jpg issue.

    It does take some of the fun away.

    Rollo?

  56. Voting, lol, like if you think that’s gonna change things you are asleep.

    Trump has been a sabot in the socialist machine. It’s good to slow the march.

    it’s plain as day the current system is very corrupt on both sides.

    …”both sides”, lol…there’s many more than two sides…and that even the main two aren’t what you think they are…it’s clear that you have very little understanding and are fine with that…

    …Spain killed a lot of leftwing fucks and they are socialist today because edyewKayshun…fuck the academy…you’d have to kill a lot of “liberal arts” profs, but then you’d probably let more profs immigrate in and corruption would reemerge…

    …only gaslighting clowns say that socialism isn’t a major problem…

    …Head FBI Trainer Jeff Cooper had it right…CLAMS…Communists and Leftists in Academia and Media…”To Ride, Shoot Straight, and Speak the Truth”…get it, read it, pass it on…

  57. Bots, not ‘ hits ‘.

    Also, if I try to post a comment starting with a symbol of just periods/dashes, it vanishes every time.

  58. “…Head FBI Trainer Jeff Cooper . . .”

    Contract shooting trainer and consultant for the FBI and various police forces, mostly at his private facility. Co-inventor of Live Scenario training used by the FBI, SWAT and popular to depict in movies and TV shows for dramatic effect.

    But not FBI. Most of his time was spent training private citizens.

  59. Back when we audited the FBI academy in 1947, I was told that I ought not to use my pistol in their training program because it was not fair. Maybe the first thing one should demand of his sidearm is that it be unfair.

    Jeff Cooper set the standards for the FBI training program. You are correct that he was a firearms training entrepreneur.

  60. “Voting, lol, like if you think that’s gonna change things you are asleep. ”

    Wow. Voting is too myopic a subject. I wasn’t explicit enough about that in my comment and regret mentioning it.

    j is a fraud and insults himself. He needs no help.

  61. Back when I took my concealed carry course, they taught the Weaver Stance. However, when I qualified, I used single-handed point shooting. I was the first to complete shooting and all shots were in the target. Not in a 3 inch radius, of course, lol. First was in the area of the heart and the bullets made a diagonal line down and to the left, as expected. If that had been a man…

  62. “He’s young, that’s all.”

    If he gets old he’s going to do it quickly and painfully. Hopefully the pain will be eased somewhat by what he’s read here finally clicking into place. Sometimes laying down “truth mines” to “go off” later when he steps into it is all you can do for a man.

  63. @Blaximus

    I’ve always considered you and @scribblerg as two sides of the same coin. @scribblerg in my opinion is accurate on the theory aspect of the current time and what has led to the current state of affairs, yes his assessment is awfully negative and it’s application would not lead to a positive place(internal war) , however, I view it as necessary to understand the negative state of things in order to forge a new path. I’ve always viewed you Blaximus and your comments here as a guide to a positive implementation of the red pill. The theory(@scribblerg) and implementation(@Blaximus) are different, a hardcore implementation of @scribblerg’s views would lead to isolation, I think he himself would admit to that, but he can speak for himself, while your implementation would lead to a more positive outcome.

    As a leader you have to be in touch with reality even if it is negative, doesn’t mean the implementation needs to be negative. Both of you guys are on the vanguard of red pill theory and implementation and I give credit to you both.

  64. “@scribblerg in my opinion is accurate on the theory aspect of the current time . . .”

    I disagree with him. I think it quite likely that the US will divide into 6 countries. Peacefully.

    That’s when the slaughter will start, as each of these new countries struggles to build a nation. And just because you aren’t interested in taking part in the slaughter doesn’t mean that the slaughter isn’t interested in taking part in you. There will be little matter of “choice.” Shit gonna happen.

    But that’s a matter of assessing the odds as I see them now. Things could change and sometimes you roll doubles when you need them, despite it being against the odds.

  65. I think men get more than enough anger and negativity out in the world. It’s crucial to understand the forces ( negative as well as positive ) that act on a man, and what he do so to attain enough balance between the two in his life so that he can form resolutions that impact him in a more masculine and positive manner.

    Men aren’t women, and all that emotional reaction and lashing out and crazy proclamations that show weakness isn’t a good thing for men as a whole.

    You can ‘ understand ‘ red pill, but it can’t assist you if you are hamstrung by negativity. RP is not ‘ negative ‘.

  66. RP isn’t negative. I agree. We tolerate the negative like, uh, a cold sore or j’s or mersonia’s infantile presence. We don’t accept all that but we tolerate it until it goes away.

    We love are neighbors, well, we’re supposed to, not necessarily what they do. That we tolerate.

    We don’t tolerate RP as it’s beneficial.

    RP is contemporary, nonreligious way to self improvement. There other ways to do the same, and all this has been expressed elsewhere, in less explicit terms but that stuff is out of fashion.

    BTW, nothing more ironic than mersonia commenting on TRM that we should all be elsewhere. He sounds like a parent. “Get off your Ipad and go outside. You’re making me crazy.”

    Yes, hope springs eternal.

  67. “And let us not kid ourselves.. whatever is left of MRA-ism, conventional MGTOW-ism, most ‘game’ and ‘seduction’ communities is a big fucking joke as are the pathetic attempts to restore masculinity by alt-right idiots. Pretty much every supposedly “masculine” community is filled with captain save-a-hoes, delusional incels, shlubby white guys who end with Asian chicks, “reformed” players and other virtue pimps- not to mention all those greedy losers who want to sell you everything from bitcoin schemes, dietary supplements, books on positive thing and “perseverance porn”. In other words, there is not much real help from conventional sources for the average guy who wants to have sex with at least semi-attractive girl who can get him consistently hard.”

    from Advocatus Diaboli blog

    what do ya all think?

    https://dissention.wordpress.com/2018/09/16/why-escorts-are-always-a-better-deal-than-relationships-or-marriage-1/#comment-108491

Speak your mind

%d bloggers like this: