Gender War

Well, once again my thought process for the next post is interrupted by another real-world example of what I’ve been discussing on this blog for some time now. My State of the Manosphere address I delivered at the 21 Convention last October is set to drop next week. I’m not going to tell which day exactly, but I feel it’s necessary to break a little protocol to make a larger point in this essay.

As most readers know, in my speech I addressed some of the social shifts in narrative that I believe we can expect in 2019-2020. Much of this foreshadowing was about how it will be necessary for a feminine-primary social order to ’till the fields’ socially in order to lay the ground work for the 2020 election cycle. On December 29th, on the Year in Review episode of The Red Man Group, I also made a few more predictions for 2019, in which I said the next Democratic presidential candidate to run against Donald trump will be a woman. Maybe that’s not too much of a stretch to believe, but I also predicted that in order to have any realistic chance of success the entirety of western American culture will need to be primed to accept a female candidate that will likely not be Hillary this time.

In my speech, and if you’ve been following my Twitter feed, I make mention of a coming #genderwar. A lot of this prediction came from the cultural suspicions that in present day America we are now in the midst of an ideological ‘cold war’. A large part of that cold war centers on issues of gender . If the U.S. populace is to accept new female candidate they will need to be ‘softened up’ with a cultural shift that empowers women to degrees never seen before. Furthermore, there will need to be a reverse effort in disempowering men. This is disempowerment has taken many forms over the past 3-4 years with social pushes for #MeToo and it’s later weaponization revealed its latent purpose – it was never about equality or raising awareness of sexual misconduct; it has only been an effort in silencing men and instilling fear. The MeToo weaponization effort came into full view during the Kavanaugh hearing in 2018. No longer was it a grass-roots hashtag ostensibly about raising awareness of sexual misconduct, now it became the weapon of socio-economic threat that the Village has always intended it to be.

However, for all the threat MeToo represents as a social weapon against men, it will only be one such weapon the Village uses in the coming Gender War. Last week I wrote about the new official guidelines issuance from the American Psychological Association (APA) deeming that “traditional” masculinity was harmful to men and boys. The decree was based on the flimsy and biased determinations of an association that sets the standards for licensed psychologists in this country. To act in defiance of this militantly feminist guideline risks the livelihoods of any psychologist who disagrees with it. And this issuance was only the latest, most visible, move against masculinity in a string of public and state university classes and organization attempting to categorize masculinity as a “disorder”. The push is literally an effort to classify “traditional masculinity” as a psychological disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) used by all psychologists.

I could bog myself down in how the APA have become the lords of the new church in carrying feminist ideological water, but this would miss the forest for the trees. The larger narrative here is what’s in play. And that narrative is one of getting a larger society to accept, by default, that the inherent nature of masculinity is evil. It’s now less about ridiculing men (though that’s definitely still a tactic), and more about establishing a qualitative state of masculinity being a personal and social evil.

In the manosphere we’ve always sussed out how western society has been Fempowered while men have become more and more feminized. Today this is not enough. Today we are being programmed to believe that any masculinity, in all its aspects, is not only anti-social, but an abnormality – a certifiable disease. And anyone who would dare to disagree with this will, as Roosh once wrote, ‘have their bread taken from them‘.

In Male Control I explored what I saw as a narrative shift coming from the Village with respect to masculinity. This post was written after the Las Vegas mass shooting in October of 2017 (for which we have no definitive answers, and even less people asking questions) and in its wake came the predictable series of articles from the Fem-Stream media. Usually this narrative starts with appeals for gun control, then it shifts off to how it’s always men or boys and ‘toxic’ masculinity, and OMG we need to teach our boys to be better girls. This time though it was different. The narrative shifted to “masculinity itself is toxic”. In that 2017 article I predicted that this would be the new message coming from the Village for the foreseeable future. And right cue the concurrent mass shooting events and any incident of “men behaving badly” in the MeToo era was (still is) written from the ‘masculinity IS toxic’ perspective.

Well, the future is now. We are in a post-‘toxic’ masculinity era. That narrative has been replace by a ‘Masculinity is toxic’ message. No longer is it about certain, perceived negative aspects of masculinity being toxic – if you are male, you need to learn to repress your maleness altogether. We are no longer just teaching our boys like defective girls, the Village is teaching men they need to become woman-like in order to be an acceptable member of western society.

Less than a week after the APA’s holy decree that ‘traditional’ masculinity is a psychological disorder we see the now infamous Gillette “commercial”. In this video men are ubiquitously portrayed as ridiculous buffoons, but also as borderline perverts, potential rapists, oblivious fathers and uncontrollable hard-ons. The message is overwhelmingly “masculinity is this, you males should do the opposite”. And this is the message most plugged in men got when they watched the show. What they fail to realize, due to a continuous feed of the narrative, is the overwhelmingly misandrous subtext to the video.

This narrative is the same one I wrote about in Good Humans. There was a message that accompanied feminist mothers’ boys when they marched in the Women’s Marches of 2017-2018; it was no longer ‘Boys Will Be Boys’ but ‘Boys Will Be Good Humans’. This then begs the premise, if you are a boy, if you are male, then you are not a Good Human. This is a fundamental redefining of what it means to be a man, according to the Village. In the Red Pill we understand the importance placed on living out the conventional definition of masculinity – manhood is not something to be given or taken away by the ambiguities of gynocentric society. But this is what the Village is fostering as it’s direction for men. It’s not enough for them to withhold your ‘manhood’, now if you resist their correction, if you embrace your innate male self, you are a “no good human.”

I’m hesitant to call this Gillette video a “commercial”. In actuality it is a feminist agitprop piece directed by a well-known radical feminist, Kim Gerhig. Kim and her producer, Sally Campbell, are notorious for producing exactly this deliberate misandry when they’re not creating videos of singing vaginas. This, of course, is the ugly detail the Fem-Stream media would rather the mainstream pay no mind to. Our attention is supposed to be either on the message of “Men need to do better, what’s so wrong with that?” or “Only man-babies are crying about this ad.”

If this sounds like the Male Catch 22, you’re correct:

For the past 60 years feminization has built in the perfect Catch 22 social convention for anything masculine; The expectation to assume the responsibilities of being a man (Man Up) while at the same time denigrating asserting masculinity as a positive (Shut Up). What ever aspect of maleness that serves the feminine purpose is a man’s masculine responsibility, yet any aspect that disagrees with feminine primacy is labeled Patriarchy and Misogyny.


Essentially, this convention keeps beta males in a perpetual state of chasing their own tails. Over the course of a lifetime they’re conditioned to believe that they’re cursed with masculinity (Patriarchy) yet are still responsible to ‘Man Up’ when it suits a feminine imperative. So it’s therefore unsurprising to see that half the men in western society believe women dominate the world (male powerlessness) while at the same time women complain of a lingering Patriarchy (female powerlessness) or at least sentiments of it. This is the Catch 22 writ large. The guy who does in fact Man Up is a chauvinist, misogynist, patriarch, but he still needs to man up when it’s convenient to meet the needs of a female imperative.


I wrote this back in 2011, but these truths are timeless. The Feminine Imperative will always fall back on the duplicity of expecting Old Books responsibility from men in tolerating New Books expectations from women.

The latent message in the Gillette video is ‘men are bad humans’. Men are no longer even referred to as “men”; they are now “Allies”. The compliant ones are Allies to be used in policing the bad humans who fail to acknowledge and promote the interests of the Feminine Imperative. Just as #MeToo is a weapon to be used against ‘bad humans’, so too are Allies to be used in opposition control. And likewise, Allies use the same social shaming tactics that the Village has taught them to use.

But wait, there’s more. Not to be outdone by Gillette, now we get a video from PETA portraying men as,…guess what? Yes, ridiculous buffoons obsessed with their genitals. This is interesting considering that Kim Gehrigs agency, Somesuch, seems to be fixated on vaginas – but vagina wallpapers are okay in this world.

You’ll once again notice that the APA guidelines are being quoted here as gospel less than a week after they were made public. “Traditional” masculinity is the bugbear again, but it’s almost like this was part of a planned narrative. You can ‘cure’ toxic masculinity by going vegan.

Next we have confirmation of this connection just a day after the Gillette “commercial” went public. “Scientists” agree,…”

Again, it’s almost as if these articles were written in advance of the APA ruling as well as the timing of these videos. Now, I know, that all sounds conspiratorial. It may be some coincidence, or perhaps this is a topic that inspires a lot of writers to write about it immediately. The truth of it will come out in the coming months.

However, my predictions about all this have been remarkably accurate thus far. In fact, if I was wrong about anything it was in my thinking this social narrative campaign would be more gradual. I shouldn’t have underestimated the readiness that the Village had in wanting to spit this misandrous venom. They are going to go hard from the outset and I believe the next 2 years will be a defining moment for conventional masculinity versus its distortion and perversion at the hands of women and their allies. The line will be drawn between men who embrace their dominant, beneficent, conventional masculinity and males who toe the feminist line, gender-loathing and hoping for affirmation from their female ‘betters’ by ridiculing men who embrace it.

Understand, all of this is part of the groundwork necessary to create a social condition of distrust between the sexes. This is a Genderwar of the Village’s creation. The pretense of equality between the sexes is officially gone. Women are encouraged to embrace female supremacism now:

I would expect the next big dust up in this cold war will be on Super Bowl Sunday. The millions of ad dollars spent on these commercials will be a testament to the message of the companies’ position in this Genderwar. Remember, prior to the 2016 elections, many companies poured millions into ad buys and re-scripted their movies and TV shows based on their belief that by then we’d have the First Female President. That was a bad bet for them, but it shows how they operate. It proves how ad agencies and Villagecreatives make cultural assumptions and then sell companies on them. That’s exactly what Gillette has done here, but they weren’t the first old school company to buy into the feminist hate of masculinity; Campbell’s soup was the first to fall.

Bear in mind, these videos, these ads, these movies (Ms. Marvel will be another hit against masculinity) are only the opening salvoes in this offensive. I fully expect that by the time we get into the last 6-8 months of the next election cycle this Genderwar will have the sexes more polarized than at any time in human history. Men must be seen as a vile enemy if the Village is to ever get its First Female President. If this backfires on them it will be because they pressed too far in their zeal to debase men. They want to kick men in the nuts so bad that they might engender more sympathy or female backlash than the manufactured rage to prompt women and allies to vote for their female candidate.

Going forward, all politics will be gender politics. The litmus test for all leadership will be about vaginas and penises. We’re already seeing this Genderwar rhetoric come to the surface in the incoming fresh-women class of this year’s congress. The only imperative they have is destroying masculinity and raising up female supremacism, and this imperative will be borne out by every word they speak and every policy they concern themselves with.

Published by Rollo Tomassi

Author of The Rational Male and The Rational Male, Preventive Medicine

Leave a Reply

  Subscribe  
Notify of
foxguy148
Guest
foxguy148
Offline

“all politics will be gender politics” This has always been the case, since the beginning of mankind, it’s always been a zero sum game between man and women. I thank you for truly opening my eyes to the reality I always knew existed but refused to accept because of the bitterness that can come along with it, past it now but it’s a bitch. Man looks into the abyss but he can’t look too long. The bread part is 100% accurate, I have made my peace that I will be exiting the corporate world in the near future most likely… Read more »

Yollo Comanche
Guest
Yollo Comanche
Offline

The Red Queen is undefeated.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Online

” . . . it’s almost as if these articles were written in advance of the APA ruling as well as the timing of these videos.”

The APA guidelines were years in the making. Everyone in the loop knew they were coming.

j
Guest
j
Offline

@foxguy

“I don’t see how it will be possible to remain part of corporate America and be red pill”

Be a 🐺 in 🐑’s 👔👖

boulderhead
Guest

All this “pain and suffering” over “the first woman president”. Thank God they all aren’t on the rag for two whole years at the same time.

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline

The trick to being rp in ” corporate America ” is recognizing that your name isn’t on the building.

There’s my personal life and beliefs,

Then there’s my job.

My job plays it’s games, I play mine. When the job’s games become a bit too much, I will go away – back to my life. My life is always there. Corporate America is not.

Yollo Comanche
Guest
Yollo Comanche
Offline

I find that reassuring Blaximus. Thank you.

Lost Patrol
Guest
Lost Patrol
Offline

It will be crystallizing.

The men that can actually hold a masculine frame during all this will get outlaw bonus points, further enhancing their appeal to the female subconscious.

The men that fold will fall further than ever into women’s contempt zone, even as women publicly praise them.

The withholding of bread could be a real danger for many men that haven’t arrived at a self-sustaining point in life. This will be a problem for some with red pill knowledge, depending on place and nature of employment. Good game, of the sort not exclusively concerned with pick up artistry, will be a requirement.

Guest#1
Guest
Guest#1
Offline

It’s hard to argue with your points here Rollo. Open misandry everywhere you look and this week has been a doozy. First the APA, then Gillette, then Peta all had their guidelines, articles, and videos queued up to drop all at once. Suspiciously coincidental. I may be being pessimistic here but I think their messages are working as intended. It’s not about the money they’ll lose from men in the short term with these “ads”, as men are primarily earners not spenders, their long-term goals are to be perceived as allies to women who do 83% of consumer spending and… Read more »

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline

… don’t hate.

Lol.

SJF
Guest
SJF
Offline

The trick to being rp in ” corporate America ” is recognizing that your name isn’t on the building. There’s my personal life and beliefs, Then there’s my job. My job plays it’s games, I play mine.” “Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s” It’s getting harder and harder to render up. But I do love the smell of Red Pill Bottoms Up approach in the morning, afternoon and evening. Smells like nothing else. Feels like personal victory. The best adjective I can feel/say/do is “Unflinching”. “It’s a win for RP… Read more »

23infinity
Guest
23infinity
Offline

Gotta agree with foxguy148 here, I’m just out of university (luckily without the scar of too much debt) and have already jettisoned a relatively cushy corporate career path I was on, in favour of my own internet business ventures, that’ll eventually let me live outside the gynarcho-state if need be.

Working corporate in the West, for most red pill men (some exceptions if you’re at working at smaller firms that give less of a damn about promoting the agenda) is a dying proposition.

Sri
Guest
Sri
Offline

The question is, “What are men doing to create and take their power?” Alpha men of game isn’t enough to become alpha men who built empires.

Daniel Hughes
Guest
Daniel Hughes
Offline

Thanks for all your work

Rudd
Guest
Rudd
Offline

Yes, but look at all the massively negative comments to this propaganda piece in the media and Youtube. There is a real backlash by men and even some women to the blatant and preachy male shaming. Maybe this is the beginning of the tide turning ..

IAS
Guest
IAS
Offline

@Rollo: this escalated quickly… In the previous comments thread there were more or less two positions about APA / Gillette advert – that this is more or less no problem for RP guys (only for BP guys), and others which think it is indeed something to be wary about for all men. Personally I’m wary, but one does what one can and try not to worry about what one can’t change (like the “toxic” stoicism the APA included as a male trait, but ridiculously that they tagged it as “harmful”). Given that you are writing another post on this, I’d… Read more »

raadim
Guest
raadim
Offline

I was just reading this article and I’m very happy that I live in a country where masculine and feminine is still clearly defined. Being a man is viewed as a good thing.

“Women cook and man fix things at home” is still actual.

How to treat boys showing signs of masculinity:

https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/01/psychologists-defend-linking-masculinity-to-violence-sexism-homophobia/

DisgruntledEarthling
Guest
DisgruntledEarthling
Offline

From that ArsTechnica article

As proof of these harmful norms in action, the APA noted that compared with women, men are more likely to commit and be the victim of violent crimes, are more likely to die by homicide and suicide, and are more likely to have substance abuse issues and conduct disorders.

As if the female side of the equation has been turned into the standard view of what a human should be.
50,000 years ago these violent traits probably allowed Homo sapiens to avoid extinction. We should be celebrating these traits.

SJB
Guest
SJB
Offline

I am also surprised by the speed and seeming coordination of the propaganda.

This morning, at the gym, I added some mobility drills.

Donez
Guest
Donez
Offline

On the topic of the Gilette Ad. Same director, different video:

The contrast is obvious. Average girl = awesome, powerful, is lovely even though she jiggles (is imperfect).

Average guy in Gilette ad = piece of toxic masculine crud. Know your role and police all the other guys.

This will be the core message pushed to each respective gender for the next election cycle.

Pinelero
Guest
Pinelero
Offline

One solution is to regain the consumer spending. Buy your own damn stuff or give your designated shopper a list of friendly products. This is not an open war.. it’s a guerilla war like how high school girls character assassinate each other. It’s a feminized game… learn the rules for it. He who controls the group-think of the herd is the leader if not only temporarily. Men simply have not maneuvered in these circles as a group to retake leadership of the herd. As more BP’s see the red-light, then the momentum will change. Loading...

fleezer
Guest
fleezer
Offline

“Men must be seen as a vile enemy if the Village is to ever get its First Female President.” i like it because the hottest women like to get fucked by the vilest enemy. when this thing really heats up the mere sight of a high t man will soak panties advantage men. “First the APA, then Gillette, then Peta” lol who cares apa: get to know a few phds. lol. i’m sure the apa indirectly and probably even directly fucks with me, but i don’t care because headshrinkers are clowns and if the war popped off tonight i would… Read more »

Ralph
Guest
Ralph
Offline

To control what men think, you must control what men hear, read and say.

Vexer
Guest
Vexer
Offline

A+ Pinelero “One solution is to regain the consumer spending” Only a guy who is in complete control of his own mental state vs. the outside world (his ‘frame’, as Rollo coins it) can withstand this fem-society claptrap. That means COOK FOR YOURSELF. SHOP FOR YOURSELF (whilst refusing to buy anything that panders to the femcentric product-trends). Know what it takes to clean clothes, understand that 98% of ALL cosmetics are utterly unnecessary (shampoo, most toothpaste, shower gel, exfoliant etc…. all not needed. Do some research) Shop mostly in the fresh-produce aisles. Dress in simple, timeless clothes. Only buy quality… Read more »

Tin Man
Guest
Tin Man
Offline

I have this personal theory, there is room-full of Men someplace in the world that are smiling and clapping themselves on the back for helping make this shift possible. They realize Men are not the real consumers and spenders (realized post WWII and through the 50’s). Once realize, they also understand the driving force of any country is their ability to “consume”. What was required was a shifting of economic power, from the control of Men to women. It really is a simple equation of understanding who is “spending the money”. These Men knew exactly what they were doing. They… Read more »

Boris (@Protagoris7788)
Guest

The Gillette ad, the APA statement on masculinity and this 10-year-old tranny “Desmond” all serve the same purpose. The establishment wants to whip men who might otherwise be sympathetic to MGTOW into a false hysteria over masculinity. The same fathers who instinctively reject this stuff have been taking their daughters to soccer practice, martial arts lessons, sending them to university and the military, letting them wear pants and other androgynous clothes and boasting about how “strong” and “independent” they are. But now that the full destructive effects of feminism can be seen by everyone and fathers might have some doubts… Read more »

O.B.I.T.
Guest
O.B.I.T.
Offline

@blax
Man I loved your transcript of that radio-show call from Mike to the woke chicks. Good for him — but at the same time it showed the futility of wasting your breath talking sense to most women. The backlash is encouraging to see, but men cannot simply debate their way out of this Catch-22.

And BTW I agree — “unpack” needs to go away

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Then men who create vids like this one will have to be be unpersoned off of YouTube…

https://youtu.be/ECfhY-qKj-8

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Try one more time:

theasdgamer
Guest

The men that fold will fall further than ever into women’s contempt zone, even as women publicly praise them.

“The men that fold will fall further than ever into women’s contempt zone, even as male white knights publicly praise them.”

fify

walawala
Guest
walawala
Offline

I tend to avoid taking part in these meaningless discussions about masculinity with women because I see them as one big shit-test. In the workplace I just ignore it all together. But in the few instances where the discussion comes up with a girl I’m gaming I reframe the whole discussion about “feminism” around the 3 criteria for female to male attraction: 1. Leader of men 2. Protector of women and children 3. Pre-selected by other women Regardless of the insistence of the girl and her ridiculous feminist notions this question and answer around the true biological nature of women… Read more »

kfg
Guest
kfg
Online

Spinning what the APA guidelines really mean:

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2019/01/traditional-masculinity-american-psychological-association/580006/

I’ve yet to see anyone addressing what psychology really means. That would, as it were, queer the whole deal.

Novaseeker
Guest
Novaseeker
Offline

This is all to the benefit of red pill aware men. The harder the screws are turned on the AFC blue pill guys, the easier it gets for the rest of us. Sure, we will need to continue to adapt to the changing circumstances around us, but that’s what we do — adapt and prosper. This really shouldn’t be anything a RP man should be concerned about. Something to be aware of and to observe developing, for certain, so that we can adapt accordingly, but really not a source of worry — rather it will be a source for strength.… Read more »

ex-cartoonist
Guest

Reading the post and watching the Gillette ad, the thought that comes up is how much more dangerous half-truths are than outright lies. That men can and do behave in obnoxious, anti-social ways is sometimes true. And that there are instances when a man’s stoicism can work against rather than for him is also true. But to take behavioral information which is occasionally true and then expand it to the status of universal truth, that’s just… I’m not even sure what to call it. ‘Wrong!’ is a word which comes up. But it’s more than simply wrong. And you can’t… Read more »

Pinelero
Guest
Pinelero
Offline

@nova – not good for dad’s of daughters. I expect my grandchildren to have a masculine father figure in their life.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Online

“Do these people really believe, in their heart of hearts, that masculinity is toxic?”

Yes. In their heart of hearts they loath and despise it. There are a few of them who understand that they can’t survive without it, but that just makes them loath and despise it even more.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Online

Speaking of unpersoning, Roku has now scrubbed Alex Jones.

rugby11
Guest
rugby11
Offline

I’m going to miss being around masculine men if it keeps getting worse… Besides dancing and traveling a lot their are still many aspects of this that i struggle with bringing up at all. Just speaking about this stuff puts you an a blacklist of sorts in social circles who disagree with you so you never get a fruitful discussion from the observation you notice an both culture and community. Novaseeker you got some great points on the benefits of this,

palmasailor
Guest
palmasailor
Offline

@Rollo I think they’re boiling the frog too fast for their agenda, but not fast enough for our agenda. There’s a difference between being a fundamentally decent but blue pill man and a total fucking soyboy libtard. Lemmee get this right – they’re actually going to show this advert in a stadium on the megatron? I’d like to see the blowback Plus – my money – legitimate you to be dislikes / likes are 10:1 They’re fixing the stats – but they can’t fix the heads of everyone that seen it even though they desperately want to. @ kfg “Yes.… Read more »

palmasailor
Guest
palmasailor
Offline

@Rugby

“Just speaking about this stuff puts you an a blacklist of sorts in social circles who disagree with you”

Grow some fucking balls and call it out. Fuck em.

The women in the social scene refularly flip to the man with the strongest frame.

They’re followers so lead them – be the man with the strongest frame.

There are plenty of places women need to improve… 20% of DNA tests showing that the cucks are not the fathers of their children 30% in the NE of England.

And while I’m at it Myra Hindley..

Fuckin call it out.

palmasailor
Guest
palmasailor
Offline

Remember blue pill men already believe that they are following the script but not being rewarded in most cases.

I predict blowback

Sentient
Guest
Sentient
Offline

Palma

A lot of women including lesbians I used to work with will readily admit they want masculine men.

Yup. At a recent gathering, mixed company, the question was raised – who would you throw over your spouse for?

ALL of the women picked a traditional “bodice ripper” type – Aquaman dude, Helmsworths, etc. With a few also throwing in a Robert Downy JR snarky asshole…

My answer – pointing to the hot waitress [haaaawt!!!!] did not go over well…. lol

kfg
Guest
kfg
Online

@Palma Sailor:

If they had spread it out over three to five more generations they would have achieved total victory without breaking a sweat.

@Rugby:

Consider it a filter for the people who should be on your blacklist. When they ostracize you, thank them.

zodak
Guest
zodak
Offline

a lot of this is because girls like to write. they can’t work real jobs so they go into news/media where they can write: confessionals, opinions, think pieces (sometimes news), basically, the same crap they blather on about when you are driving them somewhere or trying to watch tv. now they post it to mainstream media websites & influence society. we used to hire pretty girls to read the news & deliver the weather, but now they think we should actually listen to their opinions on things.

palmasailor
Guest
palmasailor
Offline

@Sentient Nice bit of dread there 😆 There’s more to it because I lived with them in their house for three months as I was setting up a call centre to provide them with customers under a JV. The had two teenage daughters and two teenage sons. I had a spare room but shared a bathroom with the daughters and all their shit. I won’t go into detail but you can imagine what was lying around but they were confident enough of me to allow that. There were many drunken nights and I may have also mentioned that one of… Read more »

palmasailor
Guest
palmasailor
Offline

@kfg

5-7 years would probably have done it but typically for women they are panicking and red lining it.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Online

I actually think most of it comes down to men who had devoted their lives to “the cause,” knew how close they were, but knew they didn’t have 5-7 years more, so they amped things up in an attempt to actually see their life’s work finished.

David and Henry. And they had already lost Nelson, who was the one who both understood and legitimately liked people.

Sentient
Guest
Sentient
Offline

comment image

Wait until the MacKenzie Bezos Foundation gets cranked up… Or will it be the Tuttle Foundation?

Not Born This Morning
Guest

PETA = People Eat and Taste Animals

DR Smith
Guest
DR Smith
Offline

@Rollo

If this is all just to “prime the pump” for the first woman US President, why are they wasting so much time, effort and money? I’m afraid that unless a whole bunch of 18-35 men and woman wake up and realize they are being used, demographics are on their side and eventually if will happen. There simple are not enough red pill men and woman to keep the balance for much longer.

Chico
Guest
Chico
Offline

The summit of this tendency in electoral politics is the presidential candidacy of Senator Kristin Gillibrand. She tweeted this little more than a month ago:
https://twitter.com/SenGillibrand/status/1070106980298186753

The future is female! She’s also the one who took Mattress Girl of Columbia U to the State of the Union address and was the first to stab Al Franken in the Senate.

It will be interesting to see how she does, and how the media and her opponents will treat the obvious issue of her exclusion of men from the future.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Online

In the last thread I think I was clearly in the “This is a real problem” camp. That doesn’t mean I’m not in the “Fuck ’em” camp as well.

Next stop the 10,000’s “The poor bastards have us surrounded” camp.

Not Born This Morning
Guest

“If this backfires on them it will be because they pressed too far in their zeal to debase men.” Already done. Now they are so stupid and intoxicated with their own zeal and delusions that they do not realize (and cannot accept the horror anyway) that they are a failure. They have no cards left to play, so they keep playing the same one over and over hoping it will win a hand. But it will not. It is being recognized by ever increasing numbers to be a fake card, one that was not in the deck to begin with,… Read more »

theasdgamer
Guest

The millions of ad dollars spent on these commercials will be a testament to the message of the companies’ position in this Genderwar. Remember, prior to the 2016 elections, many companies poured millions into ad buys and re-scripted their movies and TV shows based on their belief that by then we’d have the First Female President.

That’s Fortune 500 companies, not small business.

theasdgamer
Guest

Current events are playing out much like C.S. Lewis’ novel,, “That Hideous Strength.”

Not Born This Morning
Guest

Maybe produce a competing add for another razor subtly depicting a masculine man getting a blow job while shaving? Which razors would sell best?

boulderhead
Guest

I’m going ice fishing 2/3/19,the moon isn’t right but so what.

warriorhun
Guest
warriorhun
Offline

Gas The Kikes, Gender War NOW! kek

Yollo Comanche
Guest
Yollo Comanche
Offline

Spread.

warriorhun
Guest
warriorhun
Offline

Dear Rollo,

I suspect the forthcoming Gender War will not be between men and women.

It will be a “lets you and him fight” scenario.

Masses of Blue Pill men enforcing Red Pill men to do the bidding of women.

If you listen closely to the metoo, the gillette ads, etc… you always notice the urging of Blue Pill men to stop other men doing whatever they do.

That is what the Female Imperative wants us to do: policing each other in the name of FI.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

The Geldette advert is not an accident as some argue, and the company leadership knows exactly what it is. The head of PG is proud of it as a work of social justice.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6596225/Meet-woke-women-Gillettes-controversial-toxic-masculinity-ad.html

Anglosphere feminists are the most virulent.

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline

I’d be really happy when motherfuckers stop hijacking and redirecting the meaning of things.

” Woke ” will never have anything at all to do with feminism or any part of their agenda.

… they piss me off with that shit.

Lol.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Blaximus
I’d be really happy when motherfuckers stop hijacking and redirecting the meaning of things.

Lol! Good luck with that.

palmasailor
Guest
palmasailor
Offline

In breaking news it seems Gillette charge women more than men for an almost identical product..

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6604583/amp/Gillette-charges-women-men-razors.html

Hilarious, they’re even going to piss women off too.

No one can say they’re not inclusive

😂

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline
palmasailor
Guest
palmasailor
Offline

@KFG

“David and Henry. And they had already lost Nelson, who was the one who both understood and legitimately liked people.”

Sorry you lost me on this – hasn’t tramslated across the pond can you elaborate?

kfg
Guest
kfg
Online

David and Nelson are the Rockefeller brothers. Henry is Kissinger.

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline

Correctly identify the target –

https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/people.asp?privcapId=29004

On their own, feminist can’t do anything other than flood social media with bullshit and organize pussy hat gatherings

Who is enabling them?

Those are the real problem.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Online

“Who is enabling them?”

Did I mention David and Nelson? They’re gone now, but the system they built is still up and running. Henry is one of their bulldogs. Plus there are a number of Fellow Travelers.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Blaximus
Who’s enabling them?

Well, back in the 1960’s the CIA funded some of the early feminists. Then the Ford Foundation stepped up in the 70’s, along with other foundations. More recently there’s been money from Soro’s Open Society organization (which also bankrolls pot legalization efforts, gun control efforts, electing Secretaries of State and some District Attornys in selected locations and of course Black Lives Matter).

So I guess that we just need to Man Up and co-opt a foundation or two, get a billionaire to break ranks with the rest of the globalists. Shouldn’t be too hard, right?

j
Guest
j
Offline

“Shouldn’t be too hard, right?”

lol. Much easier (and far less effort) to just take a pic of you throwing out your Gillette Fusion Pro Glide out the trash and upload it on social media with a trendy hashtag to “raise awareness”, thinking your making a difference.

I wonder who’s the gender that typically does that sort of thing?

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline

… CIA did a lot of nasty shit.

And it’s good that most black people don’t follow BLM. Lol.

Also, I support Pot legalization. When it’s legal in Jersey, I’m gonna toke up.

Co-opting billionaires and shit isn’t necessary. The fact that bhillionaires are being co-opted in the first place is what needs to be exposed, because only the craziest illuminati styled theories are widely spread, but truth and facts are what’s needed.

Soros is not alone. He’s not Baba Yaga, lol.

https://mic.com/articles/98188/the-10-billionaires-who-run-america#.afI0LzVX3

CM Evans
Guest
CM Evans
Offline

The latent message in the Gillette video is ‘men are bad humans’. Men are no longer even referred to as “men”; they are now “Allies”. The compliant ones are Allies to be used in policing the bad humans
Excellent writing RT, I will laugh out of the blue for days.
Where’s the SWAG ? t-shirts or bumper stickers so we can recognize our brothers.

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline

Oh, and I forgot this guy…

http://time.com/money/4641093/vladimir-putin-net-worth/

He’s pretty politically active too.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Online

” . . . only the craziest illuminati styled theories are widely spread . . . ”

If you tell people the Illuminati run the world they say you’re a nutter.

If you tell people that rich and powerful people run the world they say “Well DUH!”

“Illuminati” is just a label given to a particular group of the rich and powerful who have considerable influence and even control over the world because they have a lot of money, but mostly because they own (or control the companies that own) much of the world’s real resources.

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline
Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline

kfg

But mostly what I’ve heard over the past decades are announcements that the illuminati are a bunch of mystical, devilish gathering of powerful weirdos with almost magical powers who diligently work night and day on an agenda that’s very hard to recognize…. okay, sound like wealthy folks, but there’s a different way people talk about them, as if they are more than just people.

You can’t understand something if you assign measures of invincible supoernatural-ness to it.

The public face of the ” Illuminati ”

This? Not so much.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Online

There are a lot of weirdos in the world. Some of them live in rented basements. Some of them live in the Penthouse of the skyscraper they own.

Sentient
Guest
Sentient
Offline

Blax

who diligently work night and day on an agenda that’s very hard to recognize….

Hard to recognize?

Nah…

boulderhead
Guest

“The line will be drawn between men who embrace their dominant, beneficent, conventional masculinity and males who toe the feminist line, gender-loathing and hoping for affirmation from their female ‘betters’ by ridiculing men who embrace it.” This line is becoming clearer by the day. Some of my older brothers that survived the Vietnam WAR have pointed out the division in males on the street and fully expect a civil war because of this. Lines are being drawn between long time associates over petty differences in the treatment of wives and random’s. Lines are being drawn between brothers over these normalized… Read more »

Sho
Guest
Sho
Offline

Meanwhile, men will keep being better skilled at roughly everything, and the jealousy and bile stemming from it won’t make Oprah or any of the sisters more amenable or relaxed.

Difference in skills – > jealousy & venon – > misandry.
How do you break the cycle? You can’t.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Blaximus
Putin

Russians under the bed! Oh, noes! We must protect our vital fluids!

Lol.

Just off the top of my head, I can think of two other countries with a lot more pull in US elections than Mah Russhuh!

CNN says it, you believe it, that settles it? C’mon…

Sho
Guest
Sho
Offline

@Tin Man

Nature’s been assisted by a huge deal of nurture coming from high on indeed.
This is how élite succed — by allying to the lower side of human nature. The safest strategy is to ally with jealousy/envy.

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline

Clarification: I don’t watch CNN ( although some think it’s all the rage…).

Back when I had more free time, I read a few books on russia/kgb ( old school ) and specifically Putin and oligarchs. Heavy stuff. And this was before Trump/CNN nonsense.

That’s why the evident hypocrisy in sectors of the sphere over socialist/Marxist/communist hatred seems to have vanished. I just find it fascinating. Russia is all good now😂😂 but it’s ” those other ” socialist/commies that are bad.

It’s great that the net is forever.

Wadgod
Guest
Wadgod
Offline

That PETA video was hilarious.

rugby11
Guest
Albert Mascarenhas
Guest
Albert Mascarenhas
Offline

I strongly Agree with on this its completely war on gender, for disrupting families, healthy relationships. APA is the most untrusted organisation its been completely exposed with research by citizen commision on Human Rights [ ww.cchr.org must wastch.

Hans Tholstrup
Guest
Hans Tholstrup
Offline

30 years of inertia, buying Gillette by habit. Today I bought a Schick razor and blades…
We men need to vote with our DOLLARS against the feminizers (and we also need to talk to boys and young men and mock feminist messages in ads or on TV.)

IAS
Guest
IAS
Offline

The Pink Tax: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pink_tax (Gillette obviously does this, as noted above) Also, while I don’t know how accurate this is: http://www.genderleadershipgroup.com/the-inclusionary-leadership-blog/210 my personal anecdotal observations support that females drive spending (married couples including of course). Put these things together and I’m not sure this P&G move is going to be that bad for the bottom line. Nevertheless, as the company is public, I think in a few months time when they have their earnings report, we can check if the revenue on the Gillette sector, and in male products did take a hit (and how much at that). I reiterate… Read more »

palmasailor
Guest
palmasailor
Offline

@Boulderhead “Some of my older brothers that survived the Vietnam WAR have pointed out the division in males on the street and fully expect a civil war because of this.” It’s 8.30 am here and I’ve just got off a scaffolding having looked at a roof with two roofing contractors. Thats quite a late start because most days now I’m going at 7AM I had a bit of banter with the roofers on the roof. What has struck me since working manually for the last year or so is that everyone that’s on the streets early or are in the… Read more »

ex-cartoonist
Guest

@ Palmasailor Your reference to ‘one woman band’ made me laugh. It’s so true! I work freelance and recently had a coffee with a woman who also works freelance. She’s smart, professional and very good at what she does; I enjoyed working with her and wanted to keep in touch. Anyway, she tells me a story about a nightmare client which concluded with a sigh. ‘Still, that’s why we get paid, I suppose,’ she said. ‘But dealing with difficult clients is the hardest part of being freelance, don’t you think?’ ‘No,’ I said. ‘For me, the hardest part of freelancing… Read more »

palmasailor
Guest
palmasailor
Offline

@ex cartoonist

“Well, my husband is an executive for a building company”

Not just any job then – a leader of men – builders – no soy.

I’m on a date with a doctor tonight that will be good since I’m officially a Bilda at the moment.. scarred hands etc…

Sentient
Guest
Sentient
Offline

Palma

Almost no women do anything comparable.

Real One Woman Band work? They do cleaning, childcare, dog walking and massage… and stripping.

At this, the woman looked down at her hands.
‘Well, my husband is an executive for a building company,’ she said. ‘So I don’t really have to worry about that.’

Yup, these are the designers and boutique owners and writers… some real estate sales.
I know a lot of guys who fund their wive’s stores – “retail therapy” – and just hope to break even on buying wholesale.

theasdgamer
Guest

Blax, Russia is far less socialist than the old Soviets were and Russia is far less socialist than the U.S. is.

You are confused.

Dan
Guest
Dan
Offline

Sometimes I think that this is not a right vs left thing, that we are watching only the surface, but it’s a new, more empowered, silent and infinitely more effective version of that war that has never, ever stopped: The religious war. West vs East. Judeo-Christian vs Islam. Why that? because as we can see in Europe, the left has pushed for the acceptance of millions of immigrants. The population of Europe is aged and their capacity to breed children is low compared to the Islamic immigrants ( which curiously are mostly men in their prime ) who are known… Read more »

Pinelero
Guest
Pinelero
Offline

@Warriorhum-Anti-semitism is so regressive of you

DisgruntledEarthling
Guest
DisgruntledEarthling
Offline

Also, I support Pot legalization. When it’s legal in Jersey, I’m gonna toke up.

It’s legal here but it gives me a limp dick, so nevermind

Morpheus
Guest
Morpheus
Offline

Anyone seen this crazy Willie Nelson panel discussion commercial? The propaganda rolls on

1 2 3 6
%d bloggers like this: