Planned Obsolescence

ex-machina

The mainstream loves a salacious story about the sexual misconducts of men. With the recent Ashley Madison data leak the narrative was one of blaming and shaming the overwhelming majority of men who signed up for an account to cheat in their spouses. This has resulted in more than one suicide. A topic of the Man in Demand Q&A session I fielded was how the Red Pill lens isn’t limited to just scoffing at the Blue Pill in popular media, but that it also gives men a sensitivity and awareness to better understand the motivations for social narratives like this.

Red Pill aware men understand that if there is an opportunity to cast blame or doubt on a man over his sexual impulse, or the consequences for allowing it to lead to behavior that conflicts with a feminine-primary social order, shaming will always be the go-to, socially acceptable strategy. Sex will always be a clichéd thumbscrew to gauge men’s personal resolve, and this is a built-in failsafe of control for the Blue Pill’s conditioning of men.

Red Pill men understand the motivating incentives for this “cheating” and that in a westernizing culture, 50%+ of marriages are clinically and practically sexless, it’s not hard to understand the want for a man to find some temporary sexual release in infidelity, porn or delusions of emotional infidelity. It’s also easy to understand how the paradox of commitment would drive such men to suicide.

This is simply one data point of many in a larger Red Pill awareness that indicates some very uncomfortable truths women need to confront; whether single or married, men will actively seek a practical solution to their sexlessness. And it is just this sexual problem solving that will ultimately challenge women’s unilateral, social and personal power over their own Hypergamy. On a limbic level women and the imperative are aware of this challenge. Thus, it’s controlled for by investing in conditioning men to feel guilt or shaming for ever embracing their masculine sexual nature. It’s a threat.

Keep this fact in mind as I explore today’s topic. Women and feminine-primary culture have done an amazing job at commodifying women’s singular, primary agency with men – their physicality and sexual availability. It’s de rigueur in the manosphere to write articles about women reducing themselves to being next to valueless to men beyond their sexual attributes. I’ve written in the past about women’s commodifying love and sex, however recently women are being forced to face the realities of making their sexuality a commodity.

What women, both prominent and insignificant, are coming to realize is that the ultimate plan of feminism (destroying the evolved, complementary family structure of parenting) is really a planned obsolescence for womankind. As I was coming to this realization I found it rather ironic that only 5 years ago we had the likes of Hannah Rosin profiting from the idea that men were (or were becoming) obsolete. Five years later it appears the fear now is that it’s women who will become obsolete in the most literal, commodified sense. That fear is beginning to show.

In the Future Sexbots will Drink Feminist Tears

If you follow me on twitter or you’re even peripherally aware of MSM gender sensationalism in a Red Pill context you’ll know that the topic du jour this week is the coming, realistic, availability of robotic sex partners and the efforts being made to legislate against their development by ‘concerned’ women. Heartiste and many other manosphere writers naturally picked up on this. I particularly enjoyed Milo Yiannopoulos’ piece Sexbots: Why Women Should Worry.

But male sexual appetites are easily satisfied, despite what women will tell you. Blow jobs really aren’t that difficult, and in any case most blokes are fine with a pizza and a wank. For many men, sex is a nice bonus, but it’s not essential. When you introduce a low-cost alternative to women that comes without all the nagging, insecurity and expense, frankly men are going to leap in headfirst.

One of the primary and evolved differences in men and women’s neural firmware is that men are natural and intrinsic problem solvers. I’ve pointed it out in many an essay; men are wired to solve problems with a rudimentary, deductive logic process. It’s one of the reasons we get ourselves into such horribly misled predicaments with women; we expect a binary, A to B to C level of reason with women (reinforced by equalist ideology) and deductively try to solve a sex and intimacy problem with them.

Improvisation and innovation are what we do to live better; one reason men naturally view women as sex objects is literally due to wiring in our brains that predispose us to using tools. So it’s really not much of a stretch to see how men will use this inventiveness to solve a need for sex. And in an intersexual social environment that’s predicated on the commodification of sex, well, you can see how the advancement of sexual substitutes and virtual sexual experiences would be driven by supply and demand.

It’s science fiction at this stage, but the ball is rolling and this is causing the Feminine Imperative to confront uncomfortable possibilities with just the proposition of having a sexual monopoly disrupted be the innovations of men.

Do Robots Dream of Electric Sin?

As might be expected, Dalrock took a shot at this story from a Christian moralistic angle – would sex with a convincing facsimile of a woman qualify as sinning?

InnocentBystanderBoston had a good comment in that thread:

Aside from the purely moral question, there is another risk regarding sexbots. Our economy is built on the expectation that men will be motivated by marriage to produce in excess of their own needs. As we continue to degrade marriage, sexbots will be there to fill the gaps.

…with unilateral divorce law and the accompanying cash and prizes awarded to the female courtesy of judges immersed in the feminist imperative, I think s-xbots pretty much end marriage. If marriage isn’t completely destroyed forever with version 2.0, the s-xbot will most certainly destroy it. And why? The s-xbot will always give you s-x on demand. It will stay at home, faithful to you. It will not spend your money and ruin your credit rating. It will not get a judge to sign a restraining order against you. It can’t divorce you and take cash and prizes. It will never age maintaining its peak SMV forever (if you believe in Rollo’s charts.) So that will pretty much be it for feminism. Without the surplus wealth created by men to subsidize the parasitic nature of feminist centric Marriage 2.0, there can be no feminism. Women are net wealth consumers. Without husbands, there lives will ONLY be in decline. The feminist imperative can NOT allow these s-xbots to be made.

On a rudimentary level feminism has always recognized that women’s only real agency with men is sex. We can see this in the feminine-centric commodification of sex, and we can see this truth in (third wave) feminism’s embrace of sex positivity – but again, only within the confines of a feminine-centric and unilaterally feminine controlled context for that sex to happen in.

The increasingly more accepted Yes Means Yes legalistic checklist that underwrites sexual relations (for what feminists know will always be defined by ambiguous circumstances) is a glaring example of this litigious overreach in an effort to lock down unilateral control of Hypergamy for women. This is the degree of paranoia that the doubt of Hypergamous insecurity inspires in those women less capable of intrasexual competition with their sisters to secure it.

When granted the social facilities to do so, women will always base their personal choices, their personal ideologies, their social order and their legislative doctrines around relieving themselves of Hypergamous doubt and insecurities. In truth, women’s evolved socio-sexual filtering ensures that there is no practical relief from this. There is no 100% assuredness of Hypergamous choice; Hypergamy doubts optimization even after the best of choices, but if given the power, women will build a social order around an attempt to mutually allay that doubt, allay that sexual competition anxiety, and all at men’s expense and disempowerment.

Becoming Obsolete

If you ever need an example of the duplicity with which the Feminine Imperative really aligns itself with equalism, look no further than how that “equality” is expressed with preferring pro-feminine solutions to social problems.

There is a fundamental fear women experience in just the prospect of not having 100% control over their sexual selection, sexual strategy and ultimately optimization of their Hypergamy. Anything that challenges women’s unilateral control of their Hypergamous power – such as prostitution, male hormonal birth control, female viagra, DNA testing for paternity and now sexbots – must be ruthlessly and preemptively legislated against if feminine social primacy is to be maintained. Even the idea of sexbots destroying women’s monopoly on sex, however fantastical, must be eliminated before it becomes a threat.

Kathleen Richardson, a professor at De Montfort University in England, serves as an excellent example of this axiom:

“Sex robots seem to be a growing focus in the robotics industry and the models that they draw on — how they will look, what roles they would play — are very disturbing indeed,” she told the BBC.

She believes that they reinforce traditional stereotypes of women and the view that a relationship need be nothing more than physical.

“We think that the creation of such robots will contribute to detrimental relationships between men and women, adults and children, men and men and women and women,” she said.

I would agree that it is detrimental in these terms, but the fear of losing feminine primacy is evident in just the prospect of sexbots.

The squid ink here is the concern for reinforcing “traditional stereotypes” of women for the almost unanimously male demographic who’d buy a sexual substitute (notice there is no call for creating morbidly obese variants of sexbots). The real fear is that men prefer that stereotype and it would force women to confront the truth that if they don’t accommodate men’s physical and psychological preferences (conventional femininity) they will progressively devalue women’s sexual agency over them by opting for the sexbot.

And that is a very pressing threat to women’s control over Hypergamy.

What were witnessing here is the acknowledgement that shaming men for their inventiveness in resolving their sexual needs isn’t working. Thus the social and legislative power the Feminine Imperative wields has to be invoked. Naturally there will be “think of the children” appeals and the admonishments of dehumanization on the part of men, but the binary truth is that women’s prime commodity (sex) could be reduced to making women obsolete.

The following is an exchange between Vitriol and YaReally from the last post.

“However, the biggest secret they all want to hide is that using money, whether doing something like you described or paying for pussy outright, is the most efficient way to get laid. If your main goal is to get laid as much as possible, does it matter whether you followed some arbitrary rules that some guy posted on the internet along the way? ”

lol brb taking a helicopter to the top of Mount Everest because it’s more efficient than those dumbasses who actually CLIMB it. It DOES matter to men who’s goal isn’t “to get laid as much as possible” but is “to get laid by girls who are legitimately into me, as much as possible”. To each their own.

If we accept the Pareto Principle as a rough guideline, 80% of men are Betas who simply don’t care to, or accept that they don’t have the capacity to, concern themselves with learning how to “get laid with girls who are genuinely into them.” They’ll create every manner of rationale to convince themselves that the girl who solves his sexual thirst is genuinely into him, or he’ll opt for the most available, most feasible, means to resolve that sexual deprivation. The ubiquitousness of free, easily accessible, streaming hi-def pornography is a testament to this dynamic.

Whether the reality of convincing sexbots is ever achieved isn’t really relevant in this equation, the fear of losing primary control of Hypergamy is what’s at stake. We see this fear manifested in criminalizing prostitution and the shame of men seeking sexual release via pornography and Ashley Madison accounts.

Recently I was asked about my take on the legal pushback on the part of women to regulate or outright ban the FDA approval of the female form of Viagra. From the socially acceptable perspective the fear is that the drug might be used as another (more effective) date rape drug. From a Red Pill perspective the fear is, once again, rooted in women’s fear of men circumventing women’s sexual strategy by chemically influencing their arousal process.

It’s one thing to forcibly rape a woman and thereby take control of her Hypergamous choice, but it quite another to prompt her into engaging in sex she is influenced to by some extrinsic means. As such, women’s sexual selection and Hypergamous optimization is effectively mitigated if not removed from the sexual equation by an invention of men. So once again we see the nervous efforts of the Feminine Imperative to ban any prospective attempts by men to exercise even a marginal control over Hypergamy.

Women have access to safe and legal abortion (a Hypergamous control), but a drug that might influence their libido and thus lead them to sexual choices they might no otherwise control and make, even the idea of that innovation needs regulation. Remove women from the sexual selection and arousal process and you make their only value – the value westernized women have systematically established for themselves – effectively obsolete.

That’s not a judgement call. Women tend to conflate their personal, intrinsic value with their sexual market value. However, in the SMP that is predicated upon women’s only value to men being sexual (not as life mates, mothers, or personal worth), the monopoly of sexual leverage becomes toothless.

5 1 vote
Article Rating

Published by Rollo Tomassi

Author of The Rational Male and The Rational Male, Preventive Medicine

Speak your mind

654 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Burninator
The Burninator
6 years ago

Solipsism anybody? Even in the defense of men, it is all about women.

It’s the same point that men make, so I don’t think it’s solipsism precisely. She’s admitting weakness, admitting powerlessness and not wanting to have to face that. It’s honesty. Solipsism is more the You Go Grrrr! thing or “I doan needs no man!”.

Th' Wolf
Th' Wolf
6 years ago

@Seraph
Google “Date Ariane”
The first teaching game simulator?

Anonymous Reader
Anonymous Reader
6 years ago

Rollo And yes, equalism and feminism have done more damage to intersexual relations than any other social imperative thus far. Agree, but let’s not stop there, let’s point out again that the very same women who are all upset by even the possibility of sexbots are in many cases women who have done that damage. Girlies: you broke it, you bought it. The only way it gets fixed is when you stop lying to each other about equalism and feminism. But what I mean is that because of that damage both sexes are forced into seeking alternatives to accommodate the… Read more »

Jeremy
Jeremy
6 years ago

@Rollo Tomassi

Essentially the perfect guy with no freewill agency who could be turned on and off at a woman’s whim.

An engineered perfect man with no free will is just as disastrous for hypergamy as a world of beautiful women who will never willingly offer themselves to men is to polygamy.

Jeremy
Jeremy
6 years ago

@Rollo Tomassi Like I said, it’s squid ink to cover the real fear which is women losing sexual market share. And yes, equalism and feminism have done more damage to intersexual relations than any other social imperative thus far. Is it SMP “market share” or is it the control of male industry through SMV that they fear losing? As I said, she right for the wrong reasons. Men retreating into sexual exile with a sexbot wont make the men we need to return us to complementarity. Richardson just wants to eliminate that option for men and force them to dance… Read more »

Jeremy
Jeremy
6 years ago

To follow on…

That loss of value in sex is written in stone at this point. Much like the collapse of a lot of value bubbles being blow lately, it’s going to happen sooner or later, one way or another. Robots? VR? MGTOW? Massive social disruption? The only way to retain equalism at that point will be with massive biological and robotic innovation, and I’m not saying that can’t happen.

See: Buck Rogers, Season 1, Episode 10, “Planet of the Amazon Women”, November 8, 1979.

funoldguy
funoldguy
6 years ago

The question of will the “bots” be outlawed or not can be looked at in the light of history. When sound recording was developed the musicians unions (not sure if it was unions, but some association) had the recording of music outlawed in this country (USA) to protect musicians jobs. The companies wanting to make money selling records just went to another country (Mexico, at the time) to do the background music. And the ban on digital piracy? How’s that working out? The take away lesson here is that a new technology that enables access to something formerly difficult (or… Read more »

scribblerg
scribblerg
6 years ago

@KFG – I have my next startup idea. “Refurb vaginas” for robots – feels like new for half the price, with perhaps a tad of discoloration here and there… @SJF – I’m with you. Shockingly, I want to deal with the whole person and be a positive force in her life. I want her to want to step into my frame and bask in my dominance. I was with my friend last night, you know the one I’m talking about, and she’s in the midst of so much turmoil right now. I sat and listened to her cry and vent… Read more »

Anonymous Reader
Anonymous Reader
6 years ago

Rollo There needs to be a return to that complimentary dynamic. Richardson isn’t interested in repairing the healthy interdependency of the sexes, she wants men to abdicate to feminine primacy and thinks that will lead to healthy intersexual relations. Richardson absolutely wants men to submit to the FI. What she thinks that will lead to isn’t important. Let me drag this down to the micro level, one man and one woman in an LTR of some sort. Suppose the man started off reasonably alpha and got betaized by events. His fault, her fault, nobody’s fault, it doesn’t matter. So he’s… Read more »

Blaximus
6 years ago

Excellent post once again Rollo. The FI has set the collapse of society/culture into motion, and it’s gaining momentum. Will they be able to stop a sexbot revolution? If recent history is any indication, they absolutely will stop it. But it will go underground if sexbots ever come to fruition. Funny thing about women is, they love to compete for men’s attention. A lot of women I’ve had in my life were uncomfortable with the amount of time I used to spend with my guitars and my automobiles. Those used to be 2 areas of my life that I’d never,… Read more »

Jeremy
Jeremy
6 years ago

I think it’s important to not refer to the FI in a similar personificating manner as the feminists refer to the “patriarchy”. The FI, to my mind, is really just a default set of solipsistic, or feminine-primary behaviors that disregards a masculine point of view or equity-based view on the world. It is not a conspiracy of women, it is a baseline perspective that women share, that when left unchecked against the masculine demands of women, turns itself into people like Jessica Valenti. It is not conspiratorial, it is not premeditation, it is a social manifestation of unchecked female solipsism.… Read more »

hoellenhund2
6 years ago

I don’t know about the rest of you, but the articles of Milo Yiannopoulos are too simplistic and gynocentric for my taste. It’s great that his two-part Sexodus column brought more mainstream attention to the dysfunctional state of the mating market, but he put a very apparent spin on the whole story in order to portray women as the biggest potential victims of current trends in gender relations.

On a different note, let’s not forget that before sexbots, there will be 3D virtual porn. And the effects will largely be the same.

MikePhil
MikePhil
6 years ago

Having read both the Campaign Against Sexbots manifesto, and several articles online from different commentators, one thing that strikes me is that the language is strictly around “women and children”. Not men. Men are never mentioned once, except indirectly and through inference as the main consumers here. Now either Dr. Kathleen Richardson is incredibly naive about how big the current global market is for sex toys of every stripe, or she’s allowed the FI curtain to slip aside just a little so we can see the underlying mechanisms. As far as I know, no one has shamed women for using… Read more »

lh
lh
6 years ago

“I don’t know about the rest of you, but the articles of Milo Yiannopoulos are too simplistic and gynocentric for my taste.”

I agree. But he is no less than a professional charming jerkboy.

Principle
Principle
6 years ago

@Rollo: I found your quote above interesting: “The difference is women expecting their personal worth and self-image is makes them sexy. The expectation is that the boner test has some esoteric, intrinsic value component to it, and then women getting upset that men don’t get aroused by how validated women feel about themselves. Equalism has taught women that men should love and be aroused by what’s on their insides so never mind trying to be what any man would prefer her to be.” In that, It can tie into men as well. Here’s another take: “The difference is men expecting… Read more »

Blaximus
6 years ago

Oh, real quick and O/T Yesterday ( Sunday ) was football day for me. I’m only around to watch football every other Sunday during the season, so I miss half the games live. Football day means all manner of wings made by me. Hot wings, fried battered wings, wings on the smoker, tons of wings. Sausage and peppers and onions, and huge steak sandwiches too usually. When I feel like it, I ROCK the kitchen and the grille. hehehe… Anyway, one of wifeys girlfriends stopped by. I was busy creating winged masterpieces, but I did overhear her tell my wife… Read more »

Jeremy
Jeremy
6 years ago

Cool story Blaximus, and I don’t meant that facetiously. I honestly wish I had been in the room at that conversation.

Jeremy
Jeremy
6 years ago

@Rollo Tomassi

Women view men as success objects and much for the same reasons.

Kind of like a “cheat code” for life, right?… “But I pushed in the right code, life should be easy for me, right?? right???”

MikePhil
MikePhil
6 years ago

@CaveClown – Great comment there and I like your reasoning. If Beta Males swarm to the sexbot area, that leaves the cream of desirable, top tier males available for women; men who won’t hump a vacuum cleaner with a wig in a zillion years and with cash involved. To me, that reads as a win-win for Open Hypergamy. So, you’d think there would be support for this idea, if it was reasoned out to its logical conclusion. Women would be entirely free from the creepy approaches of lesser men not worthy of their time, saving their energies for landing Mr.… Read more »

lh
lh
6 years ago

@Blaximus: Several “unhappy wife’s” I attacked like that in response to her complaints wanted to fuck me later. It must be some kind of husband destroyer. Maybe your wife realized she became horny?

Jeremy
Jeremy
6 years ago

Women find ego attractive in men, so I can see how it’s a very easy lie to believe that somehow men are just as attracted to their ego. They’re projecting instead of understanding men.

Anonymous Reader
Anonymous Reader
6 years ago

Rollo
Men are literally hardwired to see women as sexual objects. We’re expected to possess the presence of mind to keep that very real and biological fact under control.

Women view men as success objects and much for the same reasons.

But they are not expected to keep that very real and biological fact under control. Quite the opposite, in fact. Therein lies the developing problem of female obsolescence.

CaveClown
CaveClown
6 years ago

“The flip side, however, is the constant 24/7 validation women receive from the attentions of lesser Beta men normally provide would dry up over time. Shlubs who would be running her errands or listening to her whine about her jerk boyfriend would be gone; THAT would be a huge blow. Male attention is worth its weight in gold (the RIGHT male attention) to women, and sexbots would withhold this precious resource.”

Plus society going to shit because men would be too busy fucking their robots and not producing.

We all know it’s men that make the world go ’round.

Anonymous Reader
Anonymous Reader
6 years ago

Plus society going to shit because men would be too busy fucking their robots and not producing. D’you really think that is likely? Men can be all over hi-def porn now, and still have to hold down a paying job if nothing else for the rent, electric bill and ISP. Is that going to change in a VR / sexbot world? Nah. Blaximus: Her response? ” that’s what he’s supposed to do “. Sure, that’s what she’s been programmed to believe by everything from Oprah to the magazines at the grocery store to her Facebook friends to the romance novels… Read more »

Anonymous Reader
Anonymous Reader
6 years ago

Male attention is worth its weight in gold (the RIGHT male attention) to women, and sexbots would withhold this precious resource.

We already see this with regard to porn. Especially in some churchly circles, where “male porn use” is equated to adultery. Funny how in those same circles “wife withholding sex from husband” is all his fault, too.

The right male attention is indeed gold, to women, at that particular moment.

lh
lh
6 years ago

“D’you really think that is likely? Men can be all over hi-def porn now, and still have to hold down a paying job if nothing else for the rent, electric bill and ISP. Is that going to change in a VR / sexbot world? Nah.” It’s not my favorite theory, but what the economists call “the great stagnation” could very well already be the result of internet HD porn and how little such a man needs for his happiness. And that’s not all: a man with great game doesn’t need money, external power, status to lay the women he wants.… Read more »

Water Cannon Boy
Water Cannon Boy
6 years ago

KFG-“When they wake up one day to find a bear in their urban yard they will complain about what is missing, but fail to identify that something is missing at the same time. Solipsistic Cognitive Dissonance.” Doesn’t have to be a bear http://www.newser.com/story/213188/mom-spots-spider-jumps-out-of-moving-car.html?utm_source=part&utm_medium=earthlink&utm_campaign=rss_topnews Rollo-“Egalitarian equalism has basically taught women from a very early age to strive for the Strong Independent Woman® “ This paragraph that this came from made me think of how older women often approach just trying to date as a job interview. Especially black women. Their resume, degree file, is what they see as their main attractive… Read more »

CaveClown
CaveClown
6 years ago

“Capitalism is a beta thing. It may die with the beta, just as Marcuse wanted.” Exactly. If all the beta’s check out, even working just enough to provide for basic happiness, which isn’t much for a man, then where does that leave society? Seems hypergamy done got itself in a pickle. Sure, all these advancements may make it easier to separate the beta’s from the alpha’s. The alpha’s will continue to fuck chicks, the beta’s will play with their toys. But if the beta’s aren’t given enough scraps of female attention to make being the “work horses” of society a… Read more »

Water Cannon Boy
Water Cannon Boy
6 years ago

“IMO, If a woman was left to design her own robot exactly the way she wanted her reaction would be. “There’s something missing.”

She wouldn’t be able to figure out a way to design into him doing everything she wants to keep her happy and not doing everything she wants when she shit test him, keeping her happy.
Or in other words, “I don’t know, I just got bored with him. I need a real man!!”

Sun Wukong
Sun Wukong
6 years ago

If a truly realistic sexbot with believable behavior can be achieved, it won’t be hard for it to do all the “value added” stuff modern feminist women refuse to do. Cooking, cleaning, supporting, and fucking. I have to admit that if it were good enough, I’d be hard pressed not to at least have one around even if I were spinning plates. After all, it wouldn’t get jealous either when I went out with real chicks. It’s not a danger to hot chicks on the cock carousel. It’s a danger to chicks trying to hop off as they hit the… Read more »

Blaximus
6 years ago

” If all the beta’s check out, even working just enough to provide for basic happiness, which isn’t much for a man, then where does that leave society?”

Well, I’m gonna drive across America in a supercharged car, wearing a Mohawk haircut, stealing gasoline and everything that’s not nailed down.

That’s the plan anyway…

benfromtexas
benfromtexas
6 years ago

@Bad Painter Good point. I didn’t think of it that way, but it could create amazingly different economic sprouts in engineering and other fields. @Rollo “Denial of sexual market valuation is a psychological insurance against women losing their controlling, sexual agency in their hypergamous choices.” Brilliant. @Rollo “Women’s solipsism being what it is, I’m not so sure women would realize that something would be missing until well after the fact if at all.” That’s why there are so many “Post Wall” articles written by women in the media now. They should have locked down a man when they were younger.… Read more »

Jeremy
Jeremy
6 years ago

Sexbots cannot willingly offer one thing though, submission. Women will always have them beat on that one until we literally achieve sentient sexbots. But if we achieve sentient sexbots, we’ll have a lot of other problems anyway.

The problem with modern women, is they view submission as literally inhumane treatment of themselves. So, given that you’ll never get submission, the “perfect” “nonsentient” sexbot has its advantages over flesh and blood.

Sun Wukong
Sun Wukong
6 years ago

@Jeremy

The problem with modern women, is they view submission as literally inhumane treatment of themselves.

Yet a beta male shackled up and pulling until she decides to take half of everything he worked for and the kids is just a source of delicious male tears. I’m glad I’ve not become a full victim of all the machinations of this system, but damned if it isn’t depressingly horrifying to watch in action on other men.

Seven Dials
6 years ago

“Women and feminine-primary culture have done an amazing job at commodifying women’s singular, primary agency with men – their physicality and sexual availability. It’s de rigueur in the manosphere to write articles about women reducing themselves to being next to valueless to men beyond their sexual attributes.” It’s one thing to say that the only DISTINCTIVE thing that women can bring is sex, and another to say that it’s the ONLY thing they bring at all. Or are American women really that awful? I’ve found some women can bring good conversation and banter, company, and are a damn sight more… Read more »

Sun Wukong
Sun Wukong
6 years ago

It’s one thing to say that the only DISTINCTIVE thing that women can bring is sex, and another to say that it’s the ONLY thing they bring at all. Or are American women really that awful? Yes. They view doing anything on behalf of a man, even the sex, as demeaning. They shame each other for doing any of those things in a marriage. No seriously, the couple guys I know with wives that happily do all this shit watch her friends shame her on Facebook and the like frequently. Pretty much removes all value from them as long term… Read more »

scribblerg
scribblerg
6 years ago

@Cave – Alphas don’t work? Been digesting this one for days. I was initially just so pissed off at the idea that women thought they had a say at all over male sexual expression that didn’t include them. The arrogance of it, stop and think about it. These bitches have incredible gall. I saw Rollo mention it but didn’t see it come up again (I tldred a bit of the stream), the idea of virtual reality. When you consider that and what’s happening in bio-mechanics and genetic design and biological material, as as well as all of materials science, it… Read more »

Blaximus
6 years ago

They view doing anything on behalf of a man, even the sex, as demeaning. They shame each other for doing any of those things in a marriage. No seriously, the couple guys I know with wives that happily do all this shit watch her friends shame her on Facebook and the like frequently. Pretty much removes all value from them as long term partners. Facebook is part of the ruining of the nation. I believe that. My wife inherited a house in Puerto Rico about 6 years ago. I would say ” we ” have a house…but it’s legally her… Read more »

SGT Ted
6 years ago

“Why?Because the Feminine Imperative is now Society’s Imperative. The default social code men are raised to obey is the FI full stop.”

Not anymore, they’re not. The marriage strike via “Irish Democracy” is alive and well. Young men are reforming male spaces in their own way. The FI may be the visible chattering class culture, but plenty of young men realize what bullshit it is. They just don’t say so out loud, because they are getting pussy by playing along with it.

SGT Ted
6 years ago

“And yes, equalism and feminism have done more damage to intersexual relations than any other social imperative thus far.”

What’s really hilarious is that equalism ultimately undermines the FI.

Sun Wukong
Sun Wukong
6 years ago

@Blaximus The bulk of men would even overlook all of the above if the woman was loving, caring and feminine and even made attempts at the above. We’d suffer through charred dinners while she tried to learn to cook. That’s who we are. I’d teach any woman that asks, so long as she realizes she’s not allowed to have clothes under the apron. There will be red handprints on ass. “Punishment” for their lack of foresight. Unlike them, when I was ten years old I said “Hmmm, I’m gonna be at least a few years as an adult single. I… Read more »

CaveClown
CaveClown
6 years ago

Of course alphas work. But by definition alphas are of limited supply, so they can’t do all the work.

Plus, a lot of alphas I’ve known are lazy as shit lol.

evilwhitemalempire
evilwhitemalempire
6 years ago

The most likely effect of sexbots will be population reduction. You’re looking at lots of old people with not enough young people to work to take care of them. At first immigration will be used to fill this need. BUT those young men will also have access to sexbots. So eventually there will be a greater demand on automation and artificial intelligence (as is the case today in Japan because it eschews immigration). This in turn will allow more sophisticated sexbots which will further exacerbate the underpopulation problem. Leading to demand for even better robots and AI to take care… Read more »

Minesweeper
Minesweeper
6 years ago

@Chris, September 21st, 2015 at 1:55 pm
“Onan died because he was greedy and wanted his brother’s inheritance and disobeyed a direct order from God in doing so.”

No, if it was just an inheritance issue he could have refused to lie with her. The fact he had sex then wouldn’t spill his seed inside her, (possibly because he wanted to do this again ?)

Sun Wukong
Sun Wukong
6 years ago

@evilwhitemalempire

The most likely effect of sexbots will be population reduction.

Don’t need them for this. The female population getting fat and replacing their long term value with a shitty attitude already has almost all first world nations well below replacement rates. I can’t get it up for 80-90% of women I see on an average day. Hard to make kids like that.

The US only maintains population on immigration already. We would be keeping pace with Japan for population decline if it weren’t for immigrants.

thedeclineandfall
6 years ago
Reply to  Sun Wukong

@Sun Wukong The demographic reason for low fertility in first world countries is that children are a huge expense compared to agrarian society where children are a productive asset. Afghanistan for example has great fertility because of Islam, mortality, and need for workers to harvest poppy for heroin. You are right about immigration and the United States, many states in the northeast have Germany and Japan level demographics. There is a clear “Wal-Martification” of SMV of American females and hostility to men simply adds to that ‘cost’ of children to keep it suppressed. Immigration from Mexico and South American will… Read more »

Blaximus
6 years ago

@Sun Lol. Red handprints on ass is a good practice generally, not just as punishment. I really want to say that women aren’t worthless, at least not all of them. I really do. I know a few decent ones, and some really good and cool broads. But I know what I see in the rest of the world and it ain’t pretty. But there is the wet hole thing. Don’t commit to and marry a wet hole ever. But…. I’ve said it before, if my marriage explodes tomorrow, I’d never consider doing this again. 2 strikes and I’m out. But… Read more »

CaveClown
CaveClown
6 years ago

Asked a guy I’ve known for years if he has ever heard of sex bots. He said he had. I asked if he would ever buy one. Without hesitation he said, “can I get one that looks like Katy Perry?!”

His exact words: “I’ve got my Xbox and my porn. Who needs girls?”

He went on further to explain that a sexbot would compliment his porn nicely.

So I asked my natural buddy what he thought. “That’s for losers that can’t get laid. Might mean more chicks for us though”

kfg
kfg
6 years ago

” I’d like Milo Yiannopoulos in it though.”

And I want Jack Donovan.

@The Burninator: “Solipsism is more the You Go Grrrr! thing or “I doan needs no man!”.”

You have only started your journey down the rabbit hole. Those things are only solipsism’s tools of the moment. In times past it was “You must treat me like a lady.”

@Scribbler: That is already a standard feature of the RealDoll Mach II. Your gig is obsolete before you’ve even got it off the ground.

evilwhitemalempire
evilwhitemalempire
6 years ago

“Don’t need them for this. The female population getting fat and replacing their long term value with a shitty attitude already has almost all first world nations well below replacement rates.” ———————————— True dat. “We would be keeping pace with Japan for population decline if it weren’t for immigrants.” ————————- Thing is those immigrants will be wanting sexbots too. The demand from their men may not be as great at first but when their women get used to western life…. Thing is Darwin doesn’t care WHO has children or HOW they have them so long as they have them. We… Read more »

kfg
kfg
6 years ago

“We would be keeping pace with Japan for population decline . . .”

Japan has a population about twice what it was when it fought a world war. A few thousand men could now out produce their entire wartime industrial output in a single year.

Just how many people do you really need, and for what?

evilwhitemalempire
evilwhitemalempire
6 years ago

So I asked my natural buddy what he thought. “That’s for losers that can’t get laid. Might mean more chicks for us though”
————————————
That’s another thing.

To all the PUAs and similar.

As far as Darwin’s concerned if you have sex with real women all the time but there’s never pregnancy then you’re just as big a loser as the guy with the x-box.

just getting it
just getting it
6 years ago

Men are nature’s roll of the dice; we can all see this from the variability of the hands we are dealt. And for nature this is a good thing. No-one can predict what possible or inconceivable upheaval could lead to new skills being required. So the male experience is everything from genius to autistic, because nature and circumstance have no idea what they will need next. In life that gives us a male elite, the top 20%, who will never know what it is like to want for female company. A corresponding 20% are invisible to women. The remaining majority… Read more »

Sun Wukong
Sun Wukong
6 years ago

@kfg

Just how many people do you really need, and for what?

The thought had occurred to me that sexbots are exactly the same as all other automation that eliminates the need for humans in meeting a human need. Funny how technology progresses like that.

evilwhitemalempire
evilwhitemalempire
6 years ago

“Consider that, living infinitely?”
——————————–
Now if immortality tech ever gets off the ground that WILL be a game changer.

Population reduction measures would intensify to draconian levels (they would have to really!).

On the plus side MGTOW could actually work as an antifeminist/anti gynocentric strategy because now they would actually have someone to pass the torch on to.

Themselves!

Timotheus
Timotheus
6 years ago

Great thread as usual! I appreciate hearing every man’s perspective and experience (something sadly lacking in society generally, at least in my social circle). One issue I am grappling with is identifying what a woman can offer other than the biological? I would very much like a woman who could add to my life in someway (bear with me). Ideally, that would mean showing some insight/awareness/free thinking and working constructively to support and protect my interests (family, work, recreation, etc…). Scrap that, the bar for the feminine is so low that I would potentially go with ‘non-destructive’, IE, not destroying… Read more »

Seraph
Seraph
6 years ago

I think what’s off putting to a lot of men is that they gradually see even the sexual value of their wives desire diminish and thus eliminating even the wet hole value that woman held; that or the value of it was higher for the men she banged in her party years and he gets the lower value version of her. This is the quandary a man in a LTR faces when adopting Game. You are putting time and effort in to get the attention of woman who is a diminishing asset. If one goes to the time and effort… Read more »

evilwhitemalempire
evilwhitemalempire
6 years ago

“The thought had occurred to me that sexbots are exactly the same as all other automation that eliminates the need for humans in meeting a human need.”
——————————
Then it follows that as technology advances human needs will compete with technologies needs.

Machines required to meet both human needs and their all of their own needs could well grow to regard humans as burdensome parasites.

Blaximus
6 years ago

Machines required to meet both human needs and their all of their own needs could well grow to regard humans as burdensome parasites.

And this is how Skynet became self aware….

SGT Ted
6 years ago

Capitalism isn’t Beta. Striving to impress women with your car or your wallet is beta.

Blaximus
6 years ago

Rollo said “….. My point is understanding the nature of the SMV reduced to its most base commodity.” It’s fascinating that only women have reduced their SMV to a base commodity, or more correctly, they’ve allowed the FI/feminism to eliminate other aspects of their SMV. The reluctance on women’s part to not add any real value to themselves is an artificial ideal established for them, and initially it worked because the men still committed and followed the old set of books. Most bad ideas can work a while, provided there is a measure of restraint. My father used to say… Read more »

keyser Soze
keyser Soze
6 years ago

“When looking for a life partner, my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands. When it comes time to settle down, find someone who wants an equal partner. Someone who thinks women should be smart, opinionated and ambitious. Someone who values fairness and expects or, even better, wants to do his share in the home. These men exist and, trust me, over time, nothing is sexier.” AND, make… Read more »

DeNihilist
DeNihilist
6 years ago

Using the courts is the latest thing to control us deniers, so of course masculinity will be next on the docket.

RICO? Really?

As I like to say, “Go Fuck yer Hat!”

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/09/19/climate-alarmists-demand-obama-use-the-rico-act-to-silence-critics/

Jeremy
Jeremy
6 years ago

Hrm… wrong wordpress tab DeNihilist? Not to worry, I’ve been reading Anthony since 2005 or so I think, whenever he started. Unfortunately I got tired of reading about that nonsense, only because it’s so unbelievable to me that anyone still “believes” that we’re causing doom in that way. It’s truly a religion.

@Sun

When is the next gab session? I’ve missed a few I think might be nice to rejoin.

kfg
kfg
6 years ago

“Consider that, living infinitely?”

G.B. Shaw has already addressed that question:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back_to_Methuselah
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/13084/13084-8.txt

SJF
SJF
6 years ago

@Blaximus “Facebook is part of the ruining of the nation. I believe that.” Even though I don’t use or regularly peruse Facebook I would agree totally. A Sportman’s forum that I frequent and post regularly recently changed their software and added a “Like” button. Even though I have the fifth most likes out of 3900 members ( partly due to my cabal of friends abusing the privilege) I thoroughly detest the like button. It is feminine. A man’s forum can never be authentic or congruent without a complementary “Dislike” button. Women’s world’s cannot fathom a dislike button. “I really want… Read more »

DeNihilist
DeNihilist
6 years ago

Jeremy, it opens to the right column for me. I am trying to show that the left/feminist/libtards are so fucking useless and realizing that they are now losing the argument, that they actually want to use an anti gangster law to silence their critics. These are the same fucktards that push their feminist agenda, have already used the courts and will try to do so to “create” their version of reality. It won’t be just any men who win this war, it will be the Muslim men who will end up kicking this feminist bullshit back to the dark ages,… Read more »

Culum Struan
Culum Struan
6 years ago

Rollo – post idea – this new large scale survey with 150,000 responses showing that 1 in 5 female undergraduates at the country’s top universities are the victims of sexual assault:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/survey-more-than-1-in-5-female-undergrads-at-top-schools-suffer-sexual-attacks/2015/09/19/c6c80be2-5e29-11e5-b38e-06883aacba64_story.html

The survey’s authors acknowledge that tens of thousands of students didn’t respond to the emailed questionnaire, and the responses may be skewed (because the ones who did suffer assault were more likely to respond than women who didn’t), but it’s still making big news – I foresee more tightening of campus rules and Yes Means Yes type stuff

Ceesi
Ceesi
6 years ago

Part of the appeal of actual sex over porn and masturbation is that is a little hard to get. Something that’s virtually effortless to attain can soon get a bit boring.

This is the main problem I see with sexbots. If they are completely subservient, they will soon become very boring. They will have to be programmed to play a little hard to get. But not so hard to get as to become excessively frustrating (like most real women). This would be a hard balance to achieve.

Tam the Bam
Tam the Bam
6 years ago

“can the guy trust that it’ll be shipped anonymously and can it store away easily/fast hidden in the back of their closet so no one will ever find out and judge them”
Hey,they got legs ain’t they? Fit GPS, and make the little darling walk from the container port, offroad, at night. Steal electric from outbuildings or the grid. No sleep till Brooklyn.
Better add a chest-gun though, for dealing with predatory hikers and campers. And bears. Don’t want it arriving in “pre-loved” condition.

Vitriol
Vitriol
6 years ago

@Timotheus “But what is the point of entering a relationship (with anyone) without some mutuality and a sense of advancing both your and their interests? Throw in the serious costs of making a wrong decision and things get complicated. Is this the wrong mental attitude? Or is it simply a matter of going through life advancing my own interests.” If you’re intelligent enough to realize the consequences of entering into a serious relationship at this time, you’re also able to realize that the risks associated with things like divorce, child support and custody, domestic violence, and rape accusations are very… Read more »

CaveClown
CaveClown
6 years ago

If the sexbots don’t come with an LMR routine, I will be highly disappointed. Rugby, “How are you holding up?” I’m good man. Met with my attorney on Friday, and things are proceeding. Lots of details to the divorce process that I can’t talk about lest I identify myself, all of which have been a quite literal hell to deal with. But my lawyer is a good friend and one of the top divorce lawyers in the state I live in. He has written, helped write, and has worked closely with state lawmakers to push through several laws that make… Read more »

Tam the Bam
Tam the Bam
6 years ago

“the entitlement of the under 25 year old woman will be off the charts as our population ages, a la “Children of Men”. They become a scarcer commodity whose value inflates. The cost to spin one of these ‘paper plates’ will put many men out of the sexual marketplace.” Well, up to a point, Lord Copper. Men able to service the included surcharges, attractive men with resources, will not, very carefully and deliberately not be breeding with these pathetic lumps. Same as they do now. I believe the reason is that consciously or unconsciously they do not wish their heirs… Read more »

Johnycomelately
Johnycomelately
6 years ago

What is being overlooked In the discussion is the very nature of serial monogamy, the FI’s preferred mating structure. At its core serial monogamy means that a larger pool of women will sequentially share a smaller pool of desirable men. The off period when not in a serial monogamy relationships will be filled with sharing an even smaller core of Alpha fucks at a higher frequency. The bottom third of men are not even necessary, they’re the drone class and artificial sexual stimulation will keep them happily chugging along propping up the entire edifice. All they need to do is… Read more »

Andy
Andy
6 years ago

This is the quandary a man in a LTR faces when adopting Game. You are putting time and effort in to get the attention of woman who is a diminishing asset. If one goes to the time and effort to improve oneself and be more attractive and arousing to women period, why focus on the one who let herself go and gives you shit, and not something younger and hotter? @Seraph Do you have kids? If I didn’t I’d be gone. After seeing how good you can get at game I see no reason that you couldn’t convince your wife… Read more »

longgone
longgone
6 years ago

Andy,
The silver lining of the menopause cloud for me was that there was a last little burst of horniness from the ex at that stage, of which I tried to take full advantage.

Andy
Andy
6 years ago

@longgone

For me it’s many years away. If I get my game to where I want to get it I hope to be able to pull much younger women. It would just be hard to justify sticking around at that point unless she gave a little.

Badpainter
Badpainter
6 years ago

“Machines required to meet both human needs and their all of their own needs could well grow to regard humans as burdensome parasites.

And this is how Skynet became self aware….”

Men required to meet both women’s needs and their all of their own needs could well grow to regard women as burdensome parasites.

And this is how men became Redpill aware….

CaveClown
CaveClown
6 years ago

“They view doing anything on behalf of a man, even the sex, as demeaning. They shame each other for doing any of those things in a marriage. No seriously, the couple guys I know with wives that happily do all this shit watch her friends shame her on Facebook and the like frequently. Pretty much removes all value from them as long term partners. Are they that awful? Absolutely. They have worked to make themselves valuable to men only as wet holes by removing all other benefits, then complain when we only value them as wet holes.” So true. The… Read more »

Jeremy
Jeremy
6 years ago

@CaveClown There’s a maxim in the manosphere that I think was created by Heartiste… ‘Women get the men they deserve.’ Basically, women who fail to accommodate male desires in their lives will ultimately end up quite unhappy, as the only men they will be left with will be simps who follow them around, a far cry from alpha. The converse is also true, men who fail to consider female desires in their lives (i.e., they get fat, don’t seek adventure, don’t learn social dynamics, etc…) will end up stuck with the dregs of womankind, if they manage to snag a… Read more »

Razorwire
Razorwire
6 years ago

“It’s just sex. Really, it’s meaningless.” – Andy, Yes. And while women are Tindering overtime to reduce the value of their sexual commodity to nil, the looming cat is getting fat. Repacking their sexuality with meaning down the road when they are seeking to consolidate their beta bux becomes a harder sell; the fat cat isn’t going back in the bag so easily. Because for women, its not just that it is meaningless but its that the meaning is defined according to the feminine objectives and priorities. The meaning will be crafted, often post facto, in accordance with optimizing her… Read more »

YaReally
6 years ago

Too busy to read the thread but wanted to throw this out there: We all know about the grasseaters in Japan, but here’s an in-depth look at how a lot of beta guys are happy enough even without the physical sexbot: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmNUGGGd_E8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PKwcJVa3dU The middle of this where he visits the cuddling girl is fucking creepy as fuck lol: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpZbu7J7UL4 This goes back to what I was saying where a lot of guys learn pickup to feel wanted by a girl, that’s why they don’t just go pay a hooker to get their dick wet. They want to feel like… Read more »

MikePhil
MikePhil
6 years ago

Whether the robot option ever gains traction and becomes a realty, the real lesson to be learned here is one of dread. To Rollo’s point, the End of Men debate was an example of a shit test, scaled up to include an audience and cameras. The message was clearly, “We women can do without you men, so get used to your upcoming obsolescence. Bad boys and Gordon Gekkos, you’re invited to the front of the line; everyone else, back to the salt mines.” Once that challenge was put out there, so to speak, it begged a response and it’s since… Read more »

Jeremy
Jeremy
6 years ago

@YaReally

And notice the girl can’t wrap her head around it because she’s like “this isn’t sex”, but the guy clearly had an alright time, and he didn’t have 3d footage of girls specifically synchronized and personalized to him and what he’s feeling by a girl who’s specifically into it VS just idly playing with a toy she thinks is “weird”.

That fact should be frightening to women, should be. It should demonstrate to them how easily they are replaced if they don’t bring value to the table other than their bodies.

benfromtexas
benfromtexas
6 years ago

It’s so amazing to step back and see how men must learn/improve to perform, yet women(like plugged in BP men) exist with a small window to lock down the Alpha Provider they want. It interesting to see how men adapt & how women can easily be herded like cattle. Women pushing off marriage until the Wall is just insane. I have a girl I hooked up with 3 years ago. We bumped into each other at the mall food court. I joined her to talk, & no intention of anything else. Now she’s 25 saying she doesn’t want to even… Read more »

Scribblerg
Scribblerg
6 years ago

Porn gives us a hint of where lol this is headed. Just look at how beta and low smv guys have turned to porn to get their needs met? A sexbot that is actually a decent experience will tap even more deeply into male’s insatiable appetite for sex. I do ink this will be hArder than people think though. I was just fucking this young woman the other night and while reading today, I was trying to imagine a machine doing what we did. The noises, the embraces, the various holes, the communication etc. I. Ean it needs to be… Read more »

Not Born This Morning
6 years ago

@Rollo- “Men would be less motivated in seeking out artificial alternatives if an equalist social doctrine hadn’t turned women into sexual commodities. In that social environment there is simply no complementary interdependence between the sexes.” Rollos comment above (for me) sums up the post itself and directs attention to a more balanced dynamic that may have existed sometime in the past before birth control pills, feminism, etc. Feminine sexuality is without any doubt considered primarily and almost strictly a commodity in our culture. I want to point out the truth about our sociological mass preoccupation with rape, our struggle to… Read more »

Jeremy
Jeremy
6 years ago

@NBTM I’ve know women who have moved out of apartment buildings because someone moved their precious underclothes out of the dryer so that they could finish their laundry and not wait for the girl to come back and collect her stuff. The insane perspective some of these women have on how protected their bodies must be beggars belief. Mind you, at least one of those women has told me stories of times she got laid as a teenager. So, yeah, share stories of your fornication with friends, but in your mind you’re some kind of princess who cannot tolerate unknown… Read more »

lh
lh
6 years ago

“The insane perspective some of these women have on how protected their bodies must be beggars belief. Mind you, at least one of those women has told me stories of times she got laid as a teenager.”

It’s just female machiavellian-solipsistic thinking: If her body isn’t desired enough, make it rarer, less accessible to increase the value. That’s how they work. But because female machiavellism is unconscious, emotional, solipsistic, they don’t understand it themselves. And that’s why they are so easily manipulated by “game”, which is making use of this kind of thinking.

Badpainter
Badpainter
6 years ago

NBTM’s story illustrates how the solpisitic drive defend social security/status! is only possible if MEN are empathetic to the broadcast anxiety and fear of the woman. Sexbots threaten that default male empathy by virtue of making women sexually unnecessary. When that empathy for feminine weakness diminishes women are then increasingly treated by men as men treat one another. If the primary utility of women is sexual then a reasonable substitute for that sexual utility makes men very much more opportunistic in how they will interact with women. This will place enormous stress on women as they will have an overt… Read more »

Jeremy
Jeremy
6 years ago

Where is this criticism? I only saw IB post as a sockpuppet on this thread once.

Andy
Andy
6 years ago

It’s about how willing you are to accept that both sexes strengths offset the other’s weaknesses.

You know how internalizing red pill and game basically feels like becoming your true self. Becoming the best version of yourself is what I mean I suppose. Do you think that women becoming vulnerable and allowing themselves to admire and follow a man is a journey of self actualization similar to game? Or are they completely clueless to their development other than the fact that they are happier?

Blaximus
6 years ago

Just for the hell of it, I’ve been posing the question to random guys and coworkers as such “If a fully functioning sexual robot was created, would you sign up for one?”. So far I’ve asked 15 men. The score: 11 yes, 4 no. Aw shit. There was a consensus among everyone that women are too hard to deal with/are tiresome/are stingy with the punany. Think about this for a moment, before the FI became all encompassing in every day life and interaction with the opposite sex, look at the drive men displayed. Many commenters here have spoken of the… Read more »

Not Born This Morning
6 years ago

View this trailer and consider my comments and questions following it. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=I0hJ7NHDglU Grandma to the rescue. Why is the girl depicted as some innocent blameless victim of the boys sexuality when she and her sexuality is just as responsible for the pregnancy? Notice the scene when the “grandma” assaults the boy by hitting him in the genitils with his hockey stick? Notice how the producers placed this scene precisely in the middle of the trailer at the point where the viewer is most likely to be most engaged and immediately before they change the narrative. Why is this crime acceptable… Read more »

Blaximus
6 years ago

Rollo, I’m only partly through the article and already I’m turned off by the references about men being hateful, fearful and impotent, and needing a little viagra.

There is no reasoning with feminists ever. Yet…..good to see the actual man shamimg they love to indulge in. Nice reminder.

Blaximus
6 years ago

Ohhhhh….but I see IrritableBowel22 in the comments section. Interesting.

Ang Aamer
6 years ago

Stuff since 1981 Widespread Organ Transplant Anti Rejection Drugs Mass produced Interferon Fibre Optic networks Broadband Satellite comms Global Positioning System Hydraulic Fracturing Horizontal Directional Drilling 3 D Geologic Modeling Digital Imagery LED lightbulb Commercial Space Imaging (Google Maps) Google (internet search) Relational Database Java Commercial Spaceflight (SpaceX prize) Palm Devices Tablet Internet Streaming Services Flexible Displays UAV Stealth Technologies Carbon Fibre Memory Materials LCD color monitors and on and on… I mean all you have to realize is things like the 787 Internal cabin pressure is similar to 3000 feet msl rather than closer to 8000 (due to no… Read more »

Jeremy
Jeremy
6 years ago

LOL… ok, how can anyone start this way and be non-ironic? Reading an article by misogynist Milo Yiannopoulos on the latest trend in Sexbots: “In the short term, sexbots will be good news for dudes. For one thing, with a robot, men know the orgasm will be fake, so it removes the performance anxiety of trying to make the grade.” Misogyny is as old as the Greeks. Oppression of women by male-dominated androcratic societies is still prevalent in the global civilization of our present era. Men thrive on domination and hatred, fear and fascination of their opposing sex. lol, imagined… Read more »

Jeremy
Jeremy
6 years ago

My god that article is a gold mine…

Why? As Monica Sjoo and Barbara Mor define it the past four thousand years has been accomplished via the “total physical and ideological repression of the female body”.1 The next stage depends on the total physical and economic mechanization of the female body.

She said non-ironically, despite this…

comment image

654
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
%d bloggers like this: