Women’s Existential Fear

One of the primary perspectives of the Red Pill as a praxeology in understanding intersexual dynamics is evolutionary psychology. Even the ‘Classic Era‘ pickup artists referenced evo-psych, often without realizing it, in explaining various aspects of Game. Mystery Method itself was fundamentally rooted in the understanding of women’s (and men’s) evolutionary ‘circuitry’ as a basis for developing modern Game techniques. These were the first forays into women’s evolved mental firmware as a means to understanding the mating game we experience today – and how to use it to our best advantage as men.

However, that was really just the starting point. The Red Pill is much more dynamic than Game applications. As I’ve developed in other essays (and talks), the fundamentals of how the sexes relate with one another follow our biological realities, but also the environmental and social realities of our ancestral past. We’re still using the same circuitry in this era that our ancestors did in the past, only the context has changed. Today I want to explore the influences the legacy of this ancestry places on men and women, and also attempt to answer some questions as to why men and women fear certain aspects of the other’s evolved nature.

In my last article I made a distinction between our ancestral, localized, sexual marketplace versus the globalized SMP we find ourselves in today. This is a good starting point. In our hunter-gatherer beginnings our potential mates either came from within our tribal groups, or, when our tribe managed to overwhelm another tribe, we took war brides to breed with. This is what defined our localized SMP in the past. In fact I’d argue that a deficit in ‘marriageable’ females from within a local tribe was actually a prime motivator for going to war with an outside tribe. This is an important distinction because a lot of those same motivational dynamics are reflected today’s global SMP, and how modern intersexual dynamics have evolved.

A Need for Control

A lot of the need for social control we see coming from women and feminism today is part of an ancestral, evolved desire on the part of women to seek security in a chaotic world. Ever since the advent of unilaterally female-controlled contraception, the Sexual Revolution, and the rise of the Gynocracy, an unprecedented power over the birthing process of the human race has been transferred to only one of the two sexes necessary to perpetuate our species.

“Abortion is Eugenics” (or dysgenics) is a saying I’ve been seeing on Twitter recently. Since the Sexual Revolution we’ve not just ’empowered’ women, but men have systematically ceded any claim to our own paternity while at the same time presumed that women should, by default, be trusted with knowing what’s best for the human birthing process and raising new generations. But it’s not just abortion that is eugenics, it’s also Hypergamy and the dozens of other aspects of intersexual dynamics that western societies just presumes women should know best how to proceed with. We took the women of the Baby Boom generation at their collective word that they’d be more merciful rulers than men if we just gave them the option to be sexual with us. We foolishly believed women would police the worst aspects of their own sexual strategy after we willingly ceded power in exchange for sexual access.

Last month a reader sent me a link to a story about how Ireland had just ceded more of its own authority over their country’s reproductive fate to women by legalizing abortion. The very Catholic island of Celts has made Hypergamy its ruling motive after many years of feminist pressure. Irish women celebrated the decision to allow them to kill their unwanted children. In fact many Catholic countries all over South America are in various stages of legalizing abortion. But the sentiment about abortion in this decade is no longer one of it being a necessary evil as it was in the time of Roe vs. Wade. Today it’s cause for overt celebration among women and men alike.

Before I get run up the flagpole by critics here, my opposition to abortion does not (primarily) stem from moral reasons, it stems from objectively following the power dynamics involved and the latent purpose for abortion. Abortion is eugenics; it is the ceding of any claim to influencing paternity that men may have had for the past 100,000 years of human evolution.

So, why will women fight tooth and nail for the ‘right’ to free and safe abortion over the course of multiple generations? Why is the right to end her (and the father’s) child’s life in utero such an imperative for women?

Ask women and the feminist boilerplate answer is always “My body, my choice!“, but why is it so important to cut men entirely out of the reproductive process? What is the motivation for legally disenfranchising men from even 1% of a say in a child that is at least half his genetic legacy? This is also one of the greatest of offenses to women; that a man might have some control over women’s bodies. “Hands off my uterus!” that too is another rallying cry, but why is it such an abhorrent thought that men might have some influence in who gets born and who doesn’t?

Existential Fears & The Hypergamous Filter

There are certain fears that human beings are born with. Our evolved mental firmware is highly attuned to our own survival. That may seem simple, but we’re born with certain instinctual reservations about our environments. Snakes, spider, animals with sharp pointy natural weapons are critters we don’t have to be taught to stay away from. That fear, that caution, is part of our onboard system when we leave the womb. The same is generally true of heights and tight confined places. We also have a very defined natural instinct for revulsion. There’s actually an entire area of evo-psych study devoted to the human revulsion response. Part of our innate firmware makes us disgusted by feces, dead carcasses and putrefaction. If it’s unsanitary and might make us sick or diseased ourselves we’re repelled by it – unless we’re conditioned not to be.

The above are some pretty basic existential fears most people have. We have evolved inbuilt firmware that does its best to keep us alive, but there are other, more complex fears and accompanying revulsions that look out for our wellbeing too. The one I want to focus on here is what the Red Pill refers to as the Hypergamous Filter. That’s kind of a loose way of saying women have innate revulsions and distrusts of men who would otherwise like nothing better than the experience of having sex with them.

From our ancestral past right up until the Sexual Revolution in the mid-1960s a woman having sex was fraught with dangerous consequences. For about 100,000 years evolution wrote a breeding subroutine into the hindbrains of every human female – always doubt a man’s quality.

The Hypergamous Filter has many ways of determining quality. Last week I mentioned that women universally use a man’s height as a physical qualification for arousal/attraction. That’s one obvious criteria; check the height box, move on. I have mentioned in other essays that Hypergamy is always based on doubt – doubt that a man is the best she can do – but also the doubt as to whether that guy will stick around and stay committed to parental investment.

This Hypergamous doubt is an existential fear for women.

“What if he’s faking it?”
“What if he really isn’t who he claims to be?”
“Will he stick around after sex?”
“What if I get pregnant with his child?”

These questions, these doubts, do not stem from a woman’s Rational Interpretive Process, they are deeply rooted in her Instinctual Process.

These questions are asked beneath a woman’s cognition, and as such they comprise part of an unconscious Hypergamous filtering process that is linked to both the revulsion instinct and genuine sexual desire. This is a risk aversion instinct that has very real, life-threatening, implications to it. This is a self-preservation skepticism on the limbic level and it is the primary existential fear a woman has. And women will do anything to alleviate it. Women will do anything to ensure they have failsafes against the life-threatening consequences of having that Hypergamous filter deceived.

Why is there a ceaseless effort to criminalize PUAs approaching women on the street? Because it implies a deception of a Beta male impersonating an Alpha male for the purposes of sex. This is a crime against the Existential Fear.

The Existential Fear in women is that their innate Hypergamous Filter, their Feminine Intuition, might be fooled, and by being fooled she may either die or have her reproductive potential compromised for her lifetime by bearing and raising the child of man who is a suboptimal Hypergamous choice for her – a man who exerted his will over her Hypergamous choosing filters.

In our ancestral past, pregnancy, and/or parental investment, could be a death sentence if a woman’s Hypergamous Filter wasn’t supremely sensitive and obsessively refined. The Hypergamous Filter also evolved as a contingency against men’s biological imperative – unlimited access to unlimited sexuality.

That’s not to say pair bonding wasn’t a feature of our ancestral past, it was also a foundational aspect of mating, but it is to say that a man’s investment cost was much lower than a woman’s when it came to reproduction. That’s simple biology defining a sexual strategy for men. Pair bonding would usually last as long as it took for that child to reach survival autonomy (4-7 years). And that’s not accounting for men’s proclivity to seek extra-pair mating opportunities while pair bonded. I’ll explore this in the next essay.

Fast Times in the 21st Century

Now lets fast forward the Existential Fear and the Hypergamous Filter up to the last 60 years or so. One of the most socially destabilizing inventions of the 20th century was affording women the option to invest herself, or not, in the choices she made about her own sexuality. Unilaterally female-controlled birth control was effectively the greatest Hypergamous failsafe ever invented. It released women from the responsibility of a bad Hypergamous decision. But what it didn’t do is erase that filtering process from women’s psyches. We take it for granted, but HBC (hormonal birth control) unfettered Hypergamy for the first time in human history. And as a result men ceded more and more of their paternal interests in the human reproductive process over to women in exchange for the promise of pregnancy-free sexual access. Ostensibly, unlimited access to unlimited sexuality. Needless to say this also exacerbated women’s sexual strategy to tactically filter out unwanted males and emphasize sex with chosen males.

But the greatest sexual bargain of the 20th-21st century catastrophically backfired on men because, for all the boons of HBC, it couldn’t rewrite 100,000 years of evolved Hypergamy. And, if anything, it exacerbated women’s desire for failsafe’s against the Existential Fear of having her Hypergamous Filter fooled by deceptive men.

The social and political power men ceded to women in the wake of the Sexual Revolution has been used for one unitary purpose by women – to ensure against the Existential Fear. Why is abortion now something to be celebrated rather than mournfully accepted as necessary evil of this century? Because it alleviates the Existential Fear of bearing and raising the product of a bad Hypergamous choice.

Why did no fault divorce morph into the misandrous divorce industry we have today? It alleviates the Existential Fear. A one-sided divorce industry ensures security, support and resources that would’ve otherwise been her undoing in times before the pill. Why are the stigmas of single motherhood that existed just 60 years ago now replaced with rewarding women for their choice to become single mothers? It alleviates the Existential Fear.

When women were afforded unprecedented power and influence their first order of business was directed at changing laws to alleviate the Existential Fear. Virtually every social change, every political change, every egoistic “you go gurl” self-entitlement since the Sexual Revolution that women have initiated has had one latent purpose – alleviating the Existential Fear.

And finally, why is it that Red Pill awareness, practicing Game, a united Manosphere, and yes, even MGTOW, are perceived as an existential threat to the Feminine Imperative?

Because it all threatens to upset the security that women believe they’re entitled to in creating failsafes for women’s Existential Fear. Exposing the machinations of the Blue Pill and teaching men to unplug from a system that makes them a utility in a female-correct social order is an intolerable threat to women’s security from the Existential Fear, but it is also a new challenge the power base that security is built upon.

This is part one of a blog series.

Published by Rollo Tomassi

Author of The Rational Male and The Rational Male, Preventive Medicine

296 comments on “Women’s Existential Fear

  1. @ palmasailor

    If you’ve found comic strips ‘The Ex’ and ‘Check Mating’, those are indeed mine. I also wrote a book about my divorce which I’ve had printed up here in Amsterdam, but it’s not online at present so I’m not sure whether what you found is mine if it’s in book form. And, yes, it was a kind of therapy.

    Anyway, the current situation is that my son will soon be turning twenty-one and he, his mother and I will be meeting up for dinner to celebrate. The relationship between the three of us is as good as I can possibly imagine it and has been for some years now. I know there’s no such thing as a happy ending, but I believe my ex-wife and I got some seriously important things right to get to this place. (Although it’s still unclear what those things are. It’s partly why I read blogs like this, looking for answers.)

    The incident when I had a dream of my son dying happened nineteen years ago and your analysis of the situation which arose is 100% correct. (This also largely applies to comments by Anonymous Reader, SJF, kfg and EhIntellect—thanks guys!) When I was married, I was absolutely a Blue Pill, soul mate believing, paid-up gender equalist Beta Male. In fact, I would go further. At school, I was physically weak and slow, so I was crap at fighting, competitive sports and other typically masculine activities, plus all the boys said I was ‘a poof’ because I preferred drawing to football. So I saw the route to being a Traditional Man (lifting, combat skills, etc.) effectively closed to me. My route, as I saw it, was to become a published cartoonist, make tons of money and then tell all those football-loving guys they could go fuck themselves. I also thought if I achieved that success, getting an attractive wife would take care of itself.

    That turned out to be half true. My wife was an attractive woman who saw my potential and was turned on by my determination to be successful. And, in the same year our son was born, I landed regular work with a nationally published British children’s comic, so it seemed I was on my way.

    But that’s not how it works. Regular published work did not lead to ‘tons of money’—it led to long hours alone drawing, drawing, drawing. Okay, I could make a living and support my family, but I was damned if I was going to do this for the next twenty years. I needed to rethink my career strategy and I simply assumed that my wife would be supportive during that process … this was where my Blue Pill conditioning really did a number on me. (Wish Rollo had been writing The Rational Male THEN!)

    Well, it led to divorce and my wife did swing branches, although not to a specific man. In her words: ‘You’re 80% the man I want and I believe I can get 90%.’

    The irony is that I acted way less Blue Pill as an ex-husband. (I hesitate to call myself Red Pill though.) My frame as a father was based on the idea that ‘parenting skills’ is a thing, and so long as I was an effective father, I didn’t need to worry about my ‘rights’. This turned out to be a rock solid position against my ex-wife. Whenever she threatened to stop visitation in an attempt to blackmail me to do this or that, I’d say: ‘Go ahead, because I can’t lose.’ She’d say: ‘What do you mean?’ and I’d say, ‘Because I’m a good father. Now, if I were a bad father, you’d have every right to stop him from seeing me, but if I’m a good father and you stop him from seeing me, you’re the one who’ll have to face an angry young man in fifteen years time. So go ahead—do your worst.’ She would always capitulate.
    (That said, I’m not suggesting this would work on all women. I knew one of my ex-wife’s biggest fears was to have her beloved son hold her responsible for depriving him of his father, so I would use that. Is this similar to Dread Game?)

    Anyway, our warring ended some years ago and we set up a pretty effective parenting partnership. My career path led to writing combined with illustration, which was way more rewarding both creatively and financially. But three years ago, I turned fifty and my son turned eighteen—the end of one life phase, beginning of another—and I asked myself what I wanted to do with the remaining twenty-five/thirty years of (hopefully) good health I have left.

    And this is where Rollo inspires me. I only got onto ‘The Rational Male’ maybe six months ago, but according to his story, his work has gone from a ‘spare time’ activity for SoSuave to something more powerful and influential, something which is having a huge impact on the lives of other men. He makes it clear that this is not his career, but it is his Work. And there is something about the idea of a man coming up with his ‘Work’—as in his legacy, his mark, the thing he was put here to do, which speaks to me. You asked if I had a plan to rebuild myself and my life, and I would say it lies in this direction.

    I’m also coming to the conclusion that the grafting of Equalism onto every damn thing has to be actively opposed and I want to play a role, whatever that might be. My own ‘spare time’ activity lies in stories and fiction, so maybe it lies there. But I’m still in the figuring-out stage, which is why it’s so valuable to share experiences and ideas on this forum.

    Wow, didn’t mean to write so much. But it’s Sunday, I’m sat in the Coffee Company and it’s a good discussion. Thanks for your comment.

  2. White Knighting for religion.

    Isn’t that sweet?

    Walawala,

    Younger women don’t really have very many expectations other than what’s popular on social media at the moment.😁

    It’s interesting watching my daughters trying to interact with guys that will walk through a door first and let it slam behind them. They don’t really care because young folks have lost any sense of decorum ( which wasn’t ever a ” real ” thing, but still all men knew certain things, as did women, but young people today don’t even know much concerning interactions) and they mostly live a life with the volume turned down to #2 with spikes of #8-9 from time to time.

    Girls in my ” social circle ” at least have witnessed a different male behavior that doesn’t include slouching over a smartphone. I’d guess a majority of them might never experience anything outside of the lackluster norms.

    It was extraordinarily crucial that older generations interacted with younger ones, particularly males. It starts from birth. But millennial seems to have been deprived.

    The biggest thing I’ve noticed though, is they lack emotion or the ability to experience emotion positively – hell, or even identify the emotions they are experiencing. Lots of ” shutting down “.

  3. If someone appears to criticize ” Christianity/Christians ” ( whatever the fuck that actually means ), how exactly does that make them cowards?

    So if someone critiques Islam, they are cowards, right? Other than your biased ego investment, what’s the difference?

    Christ himself never met a ” Christian “. Get over yourself.😀

  4. If someone appears to criticize ” Christianity/Christians ” ( whatever the fuck that actually means ), how exactly does that make them cowards?

    Semiramis wasn’t being cowardly–just pathetic.

    Christ himself never met a ” Christian “. Get over yourself.

    “The disciples were first called Christians at Antioch.”

    Somebody forgot his Bible. Probably being “spiritual” or some shit. XD

  5. My point stands unaltered by…whatever that stuff was that you posted.

    Christ never met a ” Christian “. You’re following a Nicene derivative.

    He wouldn’t recognize you as ” Christian “, as in living as he lived, and believing what he believed.

    Organized religion has a way of doing that.

  6. Blax sticks to his operating principles. It’s worked so far within his immediate company so why fuck with what works?

    Commit to nothing but himself.

    That’s why he struggles connecting with young men. Young men understand the intent of a man who can’t walk back from himself.

    He sees himself as peak in human experience with the occasional aw-shucks-I-ain’t-nobody-special false humility.

    We see through that too. Hence his weird passive-aggressive defense of non-Christianity….it allows him the high road of higher thinking without explaining shit.

  7. Not passive aggressive.

    I’m not a fan of organized religion and find most of it to be bullshit as witnessed by observing the practitioners

    Plain enough Eh?

    For the record: I don’t struggle with connecting with young men. I have a hard time grasping the fear they hold towards being grown men. I’m still speaking to them a few dozen at a time, but some get Last Rites until a later date.

    I’ve gone over my experience with ” followers ” of religion speaking out of both sides of their mouths here before.

    He sees himself as peak in human experience with the occasional aw-shucks-I-ain’t-nobody-special false humility.

    We see through that too. Hence his weird passive-aggressive defense of non-Christianity….it allows him the high road of higher thinking without explaining shit.

    You got me wrong there Hoss. I am humble to an extent. It ain’t false. I AM just a dude.

    Don’t know about that ” higher road ” stuff wrt myself. I’m extremely comfortable with who I am, and I’ve put in the work to find out who and what that is. So I’m not sure what it is that you think you ” see through “. I will answer almost any question(s) posed to me in this section honestly.

    No need to make broad, inaccurate assumptions.

    smiley face

  8. So what is a Christian? A couple of billion people on the planet all claim to be Christians, but their beliefs, doctrines and practices vary widely. What does being a Christian mean? Let’s take a quick look at what the Bible says a Christian is.

    The word Christian is used three times in the New Testament (Acts 11:26

    ; Acts 26:28

    ; 1 Peter 4:16). Followers of Jesus Christ were first called “Christians” in Antioch (Acts 11:26) because they believed in Christ and followed His example. The word was initially used by their detractors in a derogatory sense, but believers embraced the term as a badge of honor.

    While the first-century Christians did follow the teachings, practices and example of Jesus Christ at that time, since then the term has virtually lost its meaning—as it’s usually not accompanied by the same way of life and understanding. Today many claim to be Christians yet don’t really follow Jesus’ teachings.

    Aight, done.

  9. @EI

    We should call him Mr. Virtue Signaller. Very much like what Scribbs does (“banging HB9s”), only slightly more annoying.

    That’s why he struggles connecting with young men. Young men understand the intent of a man who can’t walk back from himself.

    Yeah, his way works for him, but if you aren’t Blax, Blax’s way may not work for you. And Blax sure as hell can’t tell you how to get to where he is because he can’t calibrate where you are.

    I was quoting scripture, but Blax goes off into some bullshit about the Nicene Council which had zip to do with the convo. Something is wrong with Blax’s calibration….

  10. Followers of Jesus Christ were first called “Christians” in Antioch (Acts 11:26) because they believed in Christ

    …so far, so good, but I don’t think ye ken what ye say…

    and followed His example

    …and we’re into bullshit territory…people didn’t follow Christ’s example any better then than today…”all people are like that” (APALT)….

  11. spoken like a true pseudo churchian.

    Well, I don’t even play a churchian on tv and I’ve done my share of ranting about churchians. But it’s patently obvious that there were serious problems in the church of Paul’s time…that’s mostly why Paul wrote so many epistles–to address problems in the church…despite never becoming pope (or even a measly archbishop)…Paul didn’t set out to write theological treatises…Paul might have laughed at the idea that people used his writing to develop theology…although Paul apparently did some formal teaching for the church for a while…

  12. You know that feeling that you get sometimes, “this is it, I’m going to fucking die”. And it doesn’t happen and you somehow are alive another day?

    That is how women feel when they are approached by lower tier men.

  13. We all love you too Blax.

    But it doesn’t erase the fact that you’re failing yourself by measuring yourself against yourself and when that doesn’t work you pull out your 401K and bang anecdotes for the young guys like j or Hank.

    Hence your advice stops there. The most formative time In your life related to the intersexual dynamic was during your divorce. You barely give that two cents here.

    You give more time to how Christians are hypocrites. The point of Christianity is the ability to admit hypocrisy and learn to be better for it.

    Measuring yourself here in these pages with something bigger than yourself might be uncomfortable.

    If you did that you’d have to measure a version of yourself that you don’t like too much. I don’t like a lot of things about myself either and I don’t dwell on it but I sure don’t bury the fact that I have a plank in my eye nor do I bury my talents in the ground so I can protect my ego.

    Again, I love you too brother.

  14. EhIntellect

    The point of Christianity is the ability to admit hypocrisy and learn to be better for it.

    By that metric, there are very, very few True Christians in the world and zero commenting here.

    Zero.

  15. He wouldn’t recognize you as ” Christian “, as in living as he lived, and believing what he believed.

    Organized religion has a way of doing that.

    Calibration, as in, lack thereof. An ongoing problem for Blax.

  16. True Christians = Chad = nonexistent

    Ok.

    Then we are back to measuring ourselves with ourselves. Then the .45 is back in the mouth as I’ve hit top end.

  17. Frankly it’s not a big deal if you subscribe to Christianity or not as it’s not about your adherence to it. Hypergamy is a bitch. She don’t care a rat’s ass about your adherence.

    The law still stands.

    Let’s call Rollo Tomassi’s Iron Rules into question too. Throw in Pooks laws too.

    Let’s say, if you’re not true red pill or you’re not allowed to practice red pill. That seems logical.

    Well hell, I got one better, let’s just burn this motherfucker to the ground and call it progress.

  18. Read that initially and dismissed it. Re-read it, and the math used makes me dismiss it again. Looked around at 10 women in the age cohort in my immediate circle and dismissed it yet again.

    1 in 5?

    Then I should see or know of one.

    But I’m not all that acquainted with that world, so maybe the author is correct, but in its face it doesn’t make sense using the math.

    What’s interesting also, is the 2 commenters saying stuff about L.A. And NYC. Meh, maybe. Population counts. There are more hot dog carts and bagel shops on the coasts as well.

  19. But I’m not all that acquainted with that world, so maybe the author is correct, but in its face it doesn’t make sense using the math.

    Well, they used the “number of active members” on a website to get the numbers.
    And we know that’s how Ashley Madison did it, so it must be legit.

  20. “That is how women feel when they are approached by lower tier men.” This is getting boring … work on a new lead.

  21. Sentient – Back on topic. Via Rational twats…https://thecitybachelor.com/1-in-5-american-women-are-sugar-babies/

    Richard Cooper did an interview with the author, after meeting up with him at the 21 Convention last fall,

  22. “Then I should see or know of one”

    I mean…. it’s not like they walking around with a sign on their forehead…

    Only two confirmed sugar girls I know, was by ease dropping on their conversation with their girl friends. If I hadn’t, I wouldnt have “seen or known of one” either.

  23. J

    I know girls differently.😁 I don’t really put anything past anyone, and I’m not overly judgemental about what people choose to do with themselves, so over time there aren’t a lot of ” secrets “.

    Strangers, you gotta read. Women aren’t hard to read, men can be more difficult.

    Dating sites/internet offer a concentration. If one looks at gay motorcycle sites a lot, he might draw the conclusion that 1 in 5 men are gay Harley riders.

    I know chicks that have done straight up porn for a living, and some that were basically prostituting. I once watched a stripper negotiation where she asked for a thousand to bang, and dude took the offer.

    Tsk, tsk, tsk….

    But it’s not 1 in 5 in my estimation. That’s a cross between a buffer and a fantasy.

    Might make for an interesting book though.

  24. “I know chicks that have done straight up porn for a living, and some that were basically prostituting”

    By actually having a conversation with them you discovered this “secret” about them. You can’t just look at a girl crossing the street and tell me you can tell, she’s NEVER solicited $$$ for sexual favors.

    But yeah I agree the 1 in 5 girls in the U.S. are sugar babies is probably not accurate. Maybe 1 in 5 girls that go to $50K/Yr universities have done some sugar daddy shit.

  25. Sugar babies…

    Let’s define the average sugar baby: 18-24 y.o., HB >6, and psychologically desires financial independence which means they are mostly dependent on themselves ATM.

    They are needful women, emit confidence but shit tests only mildly. They’re not assertive or realistic in their own lives and as such any increase in accounts receivable corresponds with an immediate accounts payables increase. They’re not awash in cash by 30.

    They’re not LTR sugar babies at all times…that’d require single tricks to fill the income gaps. So they have to go all into overlapping BB situations and satisfy the AF elsewhere or take a break from whoring.

    Depending on the situation, she’d parasitize the host as well as she can invade his frame, but not kill him, that threat of personal destruction serves her as leverage to keep him on the hook.

    They’re still women, but not some new super predatory version. In fact they are significantly more vulnerable to predation as their decision making reaps the worst of AF/BB for women. Both become short term.

    They’re not natural savers, impulsive. Otherwise they wouldn’t be tempted to blow their most fertile and sexy years in short term, high risk sexual liasons.

    They too are betting on a periwall savior White Knight as THAT type of desperation guy she’s had a lot of experience with.

    It’s a decent deal for a guy well aware of the dynamic and squeezes that well for juice. It’s wouldn’t be too hard to flip the script and make the young woman emotionally dependent through gaslighting and sexual dominance.

    IMHO.

  26. But yeah I agree the 1 in 5 girls in the U.S. are sugar babies is probably not accurate. Maybe 1 in 5 girls that go to $50K/Yr universities have done some sugar daddy shit.

    I’d say it varies a lot geographically, with some cities having much higher sugaring than others. I would guess that between 10-20% of women in the age/attraction range have gone to the sites to see what they can attract/reel in, but only 50% of that or less actually take cash for sex at some point.

  27. @Ex-Cartoonist

    There was a girl interested in me around the time my mother passed away. I cried a lot when I was alone, never in front others. This girl kept me company and kept prodding me about my childhood. For once, I could not control and few drops of tears slipped from my eyes. That is all it took. And the same evening out of no where, she kept referring to me as her best friend, and said that “she wished” she could be interested in me. Her prodding and getting emotional with me was a shit test.

    Never be emotionally vulnerable in front of women, even when your mother has just passed away.

  28. @Sentient @Blaximus

    Citybachelor has a book to sell, so he’s not exactly an unbiased source. Although his arithmetic operations are ok.

    SeekingArrangements is the equivalent of an online “click here” survey, so the chance of sample error is pretty high, especially given the fact that they surely overreport their “girls” for obvious reasons.

    Thus “one in five” for the 19 – 34 age group is almost certainly too high. It’s also going to be heavily skewed towards LA, SF, Seattle, Miami, DC area, NYC. I’m sure that 20% of the female population of NoTrees, Texas or Frozen Lake, Alaska or Ski Run, Colorado isn’t signed up to be SB’s.

    It’s like a subchapter of a future edition of “How To Lie With Statistics”, revised edition.

    Now, all that said: there’s a clear hunger on the part of women in that age group, hunger for masculinity, and SB’ing would be one way to deal with it. We do recall that men here have paid SB’s with varying results, right?

    SB’s are essentially little mistresses, and they are a manifestation or if you prefer a symptom of larger social forces at work.

    But thanks for the link and something related to the OP, it is a real change for the better in this comment stream.

  29. @ AR

    In my vast sugar baby experience, I’d suggest karaoke bars. Lol.

    Oh, just recently 1 in 5 college women are raped too. Maybe they’re the same girls. I generally believe all sensational factoids as they confirm purity ball and virginity contracts I pressure all young girls to consider. Lol.

    What’s a young girl’s option anyways now? Whoring to pay their college loans is reality until all college is tuition free. Lol.

    I’m not sure y’all know I’m just foolin’. Lol.

  30. I’ve posted a lot about sugar babies back when I was on Seeking Arrangement (now just called “Seeking” lol – they’ve also changed the terminology to “Successful” members for men and “Attractive” members for women from SD and SB – and removed the field where the women can specify how much money they want).

    1 in 5 definitely way too high – and def geographic variation. Maybe 1 in 5 in the relevant demographic have checked out the sites after hearing about it from a girlfriend at most.

    And yes, it’s perfectly possible to bang them without paying and there are several approaches (there was a very good poster called Dawson Stone on Blackdragon’s blog – when BD did a post on SBs a couple years ago, he and I had a very good discussion about it). I usually focussed on the (slightly less attractive) girls and some older women who weren’t really SBs, but rather looking to date older/successful men. I avoided the outright prostitutes who charged “pay per meet”. In the middle there were the girls looking for gifts and maybe money but not necessarily per hour. Those could sometimes be “converted” into lays without payment – either because they wanted to give you a “free sample” of the goods (which wasn’t desire sex), or because if I was alpha enough, they couldn’t help themselves and switched me from BB to AF in their heads and resulted in some amazing desire sex (some of my best Game memories are of the lays where I was able to convert a girl from pure BB asking for cash to full on AF desire sex and wanting me and no talk of money).

  31. “because if I was alpha enough, they couldn’t help themselves and switched me from BB to AF in their heads and resulted in some amazing desire sex (some of my best Game memories are of the lays where I was able to convert a girl from pure BB asking for cash to full on AF desire sex and wanting me and no talk of money).”

    Nice.

    This above encapsulated woman’s existential fear and that real fear of zero consequence drove her to fall in AF love with you.

    Moral of the story: AWALT.

  32. The sugar babies I experience every month the sugar babies I experienced are used to bata supplication.

    The DLV men crowd around the women in a phony competition of phony female desire. The thirst is so bad any attention is good attention for these guys.

    These women are the best looking women they’ve ever talk to sexually in their life.

    The sugar babies themselves are still women looking for their best catch they can get. Any deviation from the BB norm rattles their nerves.

  33. EhIntellect [What’s a young girl’s option anyways now? Whoring to pay their college loans is reality until all college is tuition free. Lol.
    I’m not sure y’all know I’m just foolin’. Lol.]

    Sure you’re joking, let’s see… in the last week I saw the local MSM CBS affiliate force the 2 female anchors into discussing the Sugar Baby college ranking article floating around, and how something something it is. Man did those ladies look uncomfortable. LOL.
    So maybe just maybe the Left Pole is trying to push the poor ole little me, we’re oppressed girls and can’t afford college, please uncle sam make colleges free for us bullshit.

    Then I read somewhere that escapes my mind now, how certain colleges were getting worried about the 60 to 65% female student enrollment and rising trend, because things were getting ugly at some of the schools with that many chicks all enrolled and forced together.

  34. “Well, they used the “number of active members” on a website to get the numbers.
    And we know that’s how Ashley Madison did it, so it must be legit.“

    Bots. Those type of companies are notorious for bots/fake profiles.

  35. Babies may enter the game planning to get some sugar, but get distracted from sugar by feelz

    There’s a certain element of truth to this – after all the are just girlz.

    I’ve been thru about 10 SBs. All were aged between 19 to 22. All except one were pay-per-meet. Most of them are inexperienced newbies that don’t realized just what they’re getting into – its like they’ve swallowed the marketing material about travel, glamour, and all that shit. Most of the time when I’ve pumped and dumped them they delete their profile and quit. So I think the turnover is high amongst the newbie crowd. I stayed away from the obvious pros. I went back online last week after a 3 month absence and it was mostly new faces.

    I didn’t mind paying for the lay cause I just don’t hang in the same social circles as these girls and I can afford it. Almost all were black, which I prefer. They were very easy to get into bed and all but 3 were lousy lays. Of the 3, one was earning school money and had a boyfriend that we talked about frequently – a high value singer/dancer type guy that only had basic sex with her so she was really into ‘other’ things. Another was really into me and would stay overnight and fuck me about 5 times, which was something new to me. She refused money after the 2nd time and I would still be seeing here if it wasn’t for other reasons.

    The third one is living with me now. We’ve been together for about 2 years – her n-count was 2 before me and I’ve been monitoring her for trickle-truths; she’s been pretty consistent and hasn’t shown any cracks. She is now looking for part-time work to help with her costs which shows me she’s not being entirely parasitic. The desire sex is there and pretty unreal at times. Also, being 22 now, she can get pouty about things and that’s a pain in the ass that I try to ignore. But she’s on a personal-improvement quest, very feminine, and very red-pill aware so we get along socially just fine. She wants to be led and did I mention the unreal sex? I believe she’s been deep-converted and she’s sincere, but I keep my emotional guard up regardless. The test will be what happens when she graduates – will she dump me?

    I think there’s only one other SB in her social circle but most of these girls are children of immigrants and therefore are probably less likely to dip their toe in. However. I’m seeing more black and Asian girls on Seeking as time goes by. Most of here friends are either true Tinder sluts catching VD or science-girl nerds straddling the child/adult boundary. I live in a mid-sized university town so the numbers among the white-girl crowd may be as high as what we’re talking about. It’s surprising how open they are about it – like it’s the ‘edgy’ thing to do.

  36. Oh, forgot to add-

    yes, they are all whores in various degrees. A whore is a whore.
    they have no realistic realization of what they are doing to themselves.
    they all seem to be caught in the careerism trap.
    and yeah, I’m a weak-ass bitch for participating in this. lol

  37. Bots. Those type of companies are notorious for bots/fake profiles.

    I didn’t see any of that. I got proposition quite alot and got ‘real’ replies to all my queries. There are a few ‘pros’ and stripper-type girls there, quite a few ‘career’ SBs/whores-in-training, and quite a few total newbies. But I never encountered bots or fake accounts

  38. @EI
    The DLV men crowd around the women in a phony competition of phony female desire. The thirst is so bad any attention is good attention for these guys.
    These women are the best looking women they’ve ever talk to sexually in their life.

    Haha – true to some extent. However the attention I has wasn’t that ‘exaggerated’. It was more business-like. And yes, they were MUCH better looking than the crap I was dating from PlentyOfFish. My current live-in is at least an eight by African standards (no let’s not get into the rating game nonsense again)

    EDIT – I didn’t really want to comment on this on Rollo’s site, which I highly respect. I’ve made my choices and I live by them. I’m turning 60 in about 3 weeks and I can only say Rollo’s writings have totally changed my perspective on life and I’ve grown to realize I can make the choices I want and not be poisoned by guilt.

  39. “I’m turning 60 in about 3 weeks….”

    @ DE

    Awesome explanation. You’ve brought that topic to a fitting end.

    Happy Birthday too.

  40. @ DE

    “I’ve grown to realize I can make the choices I want and not be poisoned by guilt.”

    THIS is exactly what I was advocating for recently and your centered MPoO (the only thing a man can trust) creates a sustainable, creative, calm abundance mentality.

    Hats off to you.

  41. ” . . . I’ve grown to realize I can make the choices I want and not be poisoned by guilt.”

    Now we’re cookin’ with gas.

  42. @Disgruntled Earthling – if you are in Seeking Arrangement, there are certainly some bots/fake accounts. It’s nothing like Ashley Madison – most of SA is real – but you can see suspiciously similar usernames with virtually identical profile text pretty regularly

  43. Since the Sexual Revolution we’ve not just ’empowered’ women, but men have systematically ceded any claim to our own paternity

    Ordinary men have amply proved to be as malleable to orchestrated propaganda as women.
    In many mental traits, the only actual disparity between the sexes is what applies to practically every female applies to a big majority of men but not practically every one of them. On the male side, you find exceptions, and excellence.
    Average folks though, don’t differ so much by sex.

    Add to this the ancestrally evolved instinct in ordinary males to defer to the female in order to get her preference as a reward for their bowing down — with the sexual marketplace hardening for these ordinary men, what we see, online before everywhere else, is that their urge to flatter, and prostrate themselves before females, has grown hypertrophic.

    Rollo tweets to some of these voluntary matts “She still won’t fuck you”. Well, she won’t until she is afraid enough of her sexual market value having fallen, then she will. And for such kind of men, that’s far better than no woman at all. So the prostration is likely to grow and deepen still, to no foreseeable limit.

  44. I’d like nested topics — the ability to reply specifically to a comment, and reply to replies (2-layer deep nesting would be fine with me).

  45. “What if he’s faking it?”
    “What if he really isn’t who he claims to be?”
    “Will he stick around after sex?”
    “What if I get pregnant with his child?”

    In our ancestral past, pregnancy, and/or parental investment, could be a death sentence if a woman’s Hypergamous Filter wasn’t supremely sensitive and obsessively refined.

    Aren’t we conflating things a tad, though?
    You are calling both filters for Alpha Seed and Beta Need Hypergamous Philters.
    I think they aren’t the same filter.
    Actually, you can often see that it’s when she is more attracted to you (you are passing her hypergamous filter) that she is more afraid of trusting you, more afraid you won’t commit, more afraid you can go out-of-control in aggression, and so on.

    So it’s two filters, at odds with each one, because the ones that keep them relaxed and comfortable are the ones they, at best, are indifferent to.
    When we talk of abortion, it’s usually the Alpha Seed filter that protests against the conception. It has nothing to do with her being worried about risking her life.

  46. Add to this the ancestrally evolved instinct in ordinary males to defer to the female in order to get her preference as a reward for their bowing down

    “Add to this the FI programming in ordinary males to defer to the female in order to get her preference as a reward for their bowing down”

    fify

  47. @SA users

    People have discussed finding black and latino lovers on SA and similar platforms. Have you ever hooked up with pretty white women on those platforms? How would you find sugar babies except on those platforms? Are mass sugar baby meetups arranged somehow?

    I’m trying to figure out if I’ve actually seen a young woman hooking or how I would spot them (to avoid wasting time on them).

  48. “Are mass sugar baby meetups arranged somehow?”

    Kinda stupid question though ASD excels in that so here goes with the unabridged annotated answer:

    No (1).
    P
    1. No.

  49. [I] “I’d like nested topics — the ability to reply specifically to a comment, and reply to replies (2-layer deep nesting would be fine with me)” .[/I]

    Absolutely not… Your suggested format mixes up the chronological order of comments and makes finding newer comments a pain in the ass. Besides, as my comment here shows replying to specific comments is already easy enough without using the nested format.

  50. Your weakness is a threat to her — a real, visceral, wrenching, involuntary threat to her. She may not even like that she feels threatened by it, and she may be irritated at herself that she does, but she still does. The key to her not feeling threatened by your weakness is you not showing her weakness, but mastery. It is fine to have challenges, as long as you can easily, quickly, and effortlessly demonstrate strong, preferably absolute, mastery of them to her. In that way, she is not threatened by a perception of weakness on your part, and is instead comforted by an impression of competence and mastery on your part. You will slip at times, everyone does — and when you do, the key is to re-establish mastery firmly, quickly, convincingly, openly and as close to absolutely as possible, so as to allay the involuntary threat she will feel arising from the weakness you display when you slip and she sees it.

    Novaseeker, so true! In analyzing the dynamics behind the ending of my second marriage, I realize now my failing in this particular “burden of performance” was the biggest part of the undoing particularly as it relates to financial provisioning. I think one thing often missed or underestimated in these circles is that for LTRs, particularly marriage its NOT just alpha stuff where you can come up short, but also in traditionally “beta” stuff like bringing home the bacon so to speak.

  51. Most people don’t realize that I have diabetes because I don’t need much insulin throughout the day and am otherwise extremely fit and healthy, but women inevitably discover this when it’s time to inject. Has anyone else had experiences like this? How does one approach the fine art of managing a chronic health condition while preventing the very possession and recognition of said condition from tripping a woman’s hypergamous filters and initiating an unholy shit-test array?

    I’ve got a couple of chronic health conditions myself. Thankfully, neither are superficially visible, and the woman I am currently dating shares one of them so I think that is helpful in weakening its negative impact.

    That said, here is my sense of one possible answer to that, and it goes back to the picture on this post “Is he really the best I can get”. You just have to make up for it elsewhere whatever that elsewhere is. There is that old saying about the 2 guys and the bear, and the guy saying I don’t have to outrun the bear, I just have to outrun you.

    I’m currently doing some part-time work where I interact with the public alot. I’ve seen the competition out there, and wow, its not hard to outrun at all. If you workout, are fit, dress reasonably well, and have the basics of Game you are ahead of 95% of the schlubs out there.

    That said, one new phenonemon I think I am seeing in 2019 vs say 2005 is the presence of online dating apps gives many women a strong sense of FOMO and that a “better” guy is always out there. I think before online apps fostered a delusion and illusion of “unlimited choice” many women had a better grip on reality that “no, I really can’t do better than this guy”.

    Still, I think if you have a 1 or 2 things that are weaknesses or handicaps, the answer is to find those 1 or 2 things you naturally are strong at, and make yourself the very best you can at those so that those strengths overwhelm the weaknesses and make you stand out against the competition.

  52. In the Netherlands the larger cities have a policy of trying to get women (single moms), who apply for benefits, to tell who -they think- the father of their child(ren) is/are (when the father hasn’t acknowledged the child). They then reclaim (part of the) the benefits from these men.

    So not only do men have no say in whether the woman keeps the child, They also are obligated to pay for that child, when the woman decides to keep it. So the man, as Rollo pointed out numerous times, has no say in the matter, but still has to carry the full responsibility.
    Remember this. Because this to will spread to other countries, if it hasn’t already. The Netherlands was one of the first countries that legalized abortion and there is a strong feminist thinking in society here.
    Teach your sons to wear a rubber, no matter what guys!

  53. Most people don’t realize that I have diabetes because I don’t need much insulin throughout the day and am otherwise extremely fit and healthy, but women inevitably discover this when it’s time to inject. Has anyone else had experiences like this? How does one approach the fine art of managing a chronic health condition while preventing the very possession and recognition of said condition from tripping a woman’s hypergamous filters and initiating an unholy shit-test array?

    Women will smell out any weakness by the way that you view it. If you suspect that women will see your chronic condition as weak, then they will see it as weak. Zfg is the go to. The condition doesn’t seriously impact your ability to complete your mission. Zfg.

  54. Guide Dog
    In the Netherlands the larger cities have a policy of trying to get women (single moms), who apply for benefits, to tell who -they think- the father of their child(ren) is/are (when the father hasn’t acknowledged the child). They then reclaim (part of the) the benefits from these men.

    This policy was set in place in the US about 20 years ago. Do a search on “Bill Clinton” and “deadbeat dads” for details.

    Plus, in the US, a man who is behind on child support can be put in prison. However, while he is in prison he earns essentially no money. But his child support debt continues to increase. There is no way to escape the debt cycle in that situation. Some of those men go live on the streets or behind a trash dumpster in order to stay out of prison.

    This is what the feminists call “patriarchy”. It is not. It is gynocracy.

  55. Seems they are teaching Morpheus to blame himself, and for not being enough of a heavy-duty domestic appliance at that, for being left by women.

    Everybody together: We Ought To Be More Efficient and Useful Appliances For Female To Use: this will make them loOOoooOoOOve us sooo much, and provide a lot of happiness on the whole.
    Yay!

  56. “I’ve seen the competition out there, and wow, its not hard to outrun at all. ”

    Zombieland rule one: Cardio.

    Men go to jail for non-payment of child support? How can that be? Oh yes, debtor prison with a few extra steps:

    The child support is a decision from the bench. Non-payment is then changed from a civil law issue to contempt of court criminal law thing.

    It’s that important to punish men into fear and emanicpate women from responsibility.

    Ceasar’s empire, Ceasar’s rules.

  57. @Morpheus

    “Novaseeker, so true! In analyzing the dynamics behind the ending of my second marriage, I realize now my failing in this particular “burden of performance” was the biggest part of the undoing particularly as it relates to financial provisioning. I think one thing often missed or underestimated in these circles is that for LTRs, particularly marriage its NOT just alpha stuff where you can come up short, but also in traditionally “beta” stuff like bringing home the bacon so to speak.”

    I don’t agree. You are just DEERing. The original discussion was about women’s existential fear of their man being defective and less desirable (e.g. diabetes). The same could go for finances, but she still doesn’t want the guy to be a pussy and whine about his condition. Or to not be on top of it game-wise.

    I used to think that way too (take pride in my providership, that is). It’s Purple Pill.

    I turned around my thinking and Mental Point of Origin. Alpha and Beta are concepts and can be misconstrued. Frame and Mental Point of Origin, and purpose and mission trump that idea of Beta with a side of Alpha.

    The burden of performance becomes less of a hurdle when you are doing it because you want to.

    Rollo said it best here:

    https://therationalmale.com/2012/10/02/up-the-alpha/

    Beta with a Side of Alpha

    The inimitable Geisha Kate then helps solidify this analysis of her ‘Perfect Man’:

    “Great point. That ^ is the true manicorn. That is what I mean when I say I’ll take a “greater beta with fries.””

    Be careful what you pray for Kate, the women (and Manboobz) who kvetch about the ‘overly sensitive men’ they committed to probably wished for the same. In fact I’d argue that the majority of married men now looking to Athol Kay for insight believed they were Greater Betas with a side of Alpha.

    Kate’s in a stage of life when the Beta providership male makes far better practical sense to pair off with. Just like Aunt Giggles, her definition of attraction and ‘a good relationship’ is biased by the personal conditions of her present SMP valuation. She understands this from her age, SMV and necessity perspective, but this undoubtedly wasn’t her perspective when she was in the prime of her SMV years.

    This is the ‘build-a-better-beta‘ paradox:
    https://therationalmale.com/2011/12/05/build-a-better-beta/

    {The overarching point is to create a more acceptable man for a female defined goal, NOT to truly empower any man. There is no feminine opposite to this; there is no counter effort to make women more acceptable to men – in fact this is actively resisted and cast as a form of slavish subservience. This is the extent of the feminine reality; it’s so instaurating that men, with the aid of “concerned women”, will spend lifetimes seeking ways to better qualify themselves for feminine approval. That’s the better Beta they hope to create. One who will Man-Up and be the Alpha as situations and use would warrant, but Beta enough to be subservient to the feminine imperative. They seek a man to be proud of, one who’s association reflects a statement of their own quality, yet one they still have implicit control over.

    Whether the reasonings are moral, entitlement or ‘honor bound’ in nature the end result is still feminine primacy. The sales pitch is one of manning up to benefit yourself, but the latent purpose is one of better qualifying for normalized feminine acceptance. What they cannot reconcile is that the same benefits that are inherent in becoming more Alpha (however you choose to define that) are the same traits that threaten his necessary position of subservience as a Beta. This is precisely why ‘real’ Game, and truly unplugging, cannot be sanitized. This social element wants to keep you plugged in; more Alpha, more confidence, more awareness, is a threat to fem-centrism. “It’s great that all this Game stuff has finally got you standing up for yourself, but remember who’s got the vagina.“}

    I have a lot of respect for Athol, and not so much for Aunt Giggles, but the problem I see with both of their approaches in balancing Alpha with Beta is that they begin from a fem-centric origin. Athol seems to have the better take of the two, but by and large the men seeking his advice are Beta men who’ve been red-pill enlightened to the fact that they need to up the Alpha – presuming they had an Alpha element to start.

    Aunt Giggles simply wants a Beta, who’s an Alpha of a woman’s convenience. Aunt Sue had a grand mal seizure orgasm when she’d thought Roissy was actually advocating that men genuinely become more Beta. She force fit it to comply with her build-a-better-beta narrative (CH suggests using Beta as an in-context Game tactic), but it only better illustrates her latent imperatives about a post-Wall, fem-centrically defined preference for Beta with a side of Alpha.

    There is no side of Alpha. The conflict both Kate and Giggles don’t grasp is that Alpha demands dominance, and this doesn’t fit very well with the feminine imperative’s false religion of equalism. Athol understand this with his Captain and First Officer analogy; in any relationship one partner is the dominant personality, the other the submissive. Even homosexual couples recognize this order, but the women and men of the feminine Matrix resist this with the delusion of an equalist utopia amongst the genders.

    So when I read about a desire for achieving some balance of Alpha to Beta traits in the ‘perfect man’ I realize that this is an extension of this feminine-primary equalist want for balance amongst the genders; which really equates to women wanting a perfected security. In their need for control (dominance) they want hypergamy definitively settled in the perfect man, for the perfect occasion, and at every stage of their SMV maturation. Men, mangina sympathizers or otherwise, are simply the means to that end. That end may be with the perfect husband, or via cuckolding or through fem-side pornography, or any other methodology women’s sexual pluralism will help her invent.

    Up the Alpha

    I’ve written this before, but it bears repeating: for men wanting to change their lives and relationships, working up from Beta to Alpha is a far tougher road to hoe that tempering Alpha dominance with a personalized touch of Beta. As bad as Hugo Schwyzer is in his abject feminization, have a read of a few of the female commenters in this article. How many of the simpering, socially conditioned, Betatized men these women seeth about would make for believable Alphas once they had a red pill epiphany? It is precisely because of this impressionistic, binary solipsism that women will never be happy with ‘fixing’ their Beta. This is why he has to Just Get It on his own.

    It is a far better proposition to impress a woman with an organic Alpha dominance – Alpha can only be a man’s dominant personality origin. There is no Beta with a side of Alpha because that side of Alpha is NEVER believable when your overall perception is one of being Beta to begin with. This is why I stress Alpha traits above all else. It’s easy, and endearing to ‘reveal’ a flash of Beta sensitivity when a woman perceives you as predominantly Alpha. If your personality is predominantly Beta, any sporadic flashes of Alpha will seem like emotional tantrums at best, character flaws at worst.

    Women may love the Beta, but they only respect the Alpha.

  58. “Women may love the Beta, but they only respect the Alpha.”

    “No gun no respect… that’s why I always got the gun.”

  59. Have some new changes been made to the comments plugin in WordPress as @ Rollo mentioned?

    For sure have the comment field area below the last comment. Fine to leave the one at the bottom of the post but having to scroll all the way to the top is cumbersome, especially on mobile.

    The mobile experience is a bit clunky. Always phat finger the Read more link and it’s not user friendly. The styling also changes after the Read More is executed. A reader should not have to click Read More to see those styling changes to the typography.

    Seems like very few images are posted any longer. Has it become harder to do so? I only rarely do.

    BIGGEST improvement to comments would be to allow editing of your comments. Much fewer typos that way.

    @rollo, do you have a dev site where testing can be done?

    Thanks.

  60. Biggest problem on a phone is after you click on a recent Comment, you lose that menu. So you have to go back to the Home Page to try and click on Recent Comment again. annoying.

  61. Great comment. Very detailed and crucially, you look into the macro-trends and combine that with evolutionary psychology. Essentially you’re mapping the terrain.

  62. Interesting thoughts. Vasectomy is cheaper than child support. Hookers are cheaper than marriage or cohabitation. Women run on their emotions. For what reason outside of a legacy would any logical thinking man enter into an agreement with the state knowing full well that the emotional behavior of a woman will be his downfall?

    MGTOW is the only real answer to this dilemma.

  63. This makes so much sense. I never understood feminists how is the one sense would praise how infinitely empathetic women naturally are, and more kind and nurturing than men, but then could be so dismissive of an aborted baby. Existential fear explains it so well.

  64. Pingback: Alpha Widows
  65. Female existential fear is their problem not ours. It and female nature is never gonna justify the harm of men. It needs to be shamed and punished if its not disciplined by themselves.

    You seem to be focusing on it like it should be accepted as normal when its non functioning for society as a whole.

    Men have a nature that says if a better looking woman than his traditional full time house and children attractive wife comes along,well than its OK to have sex with her. Surely his wife and kids should understand its his nature. Or do a lot of men self discipline and/or scorned by society?
    No ones nature is ever going to justify their bad actions towards the other.
    Men where rightly punished in the past for bad behaviour. So shall the female currently be also.

    If you truly a voice for men you need to be writing articles on how best to limit immature females power for the sake of fatherless children,decent men and the future of western civilization.

Speak your mind

%d bloggers like this: