Sexual Selection & Existential Fear

Way back in the early years of this blog I wrote a post flipping a common feminist trope on its head. In Women’s Physical Standards I laid out the case that it is women, not men, who hold the most stringent and static standards for ideal male beauty.

…from a purely physical perspective, it is women’s idealized masculine form that hasn’t changed in millennia. While there may have been a Rubenesque period when men loved the fatties of the 1600′s, no such era ever existed for women’s physical preferences. The classic broad chest, wide shoulders, six-pack abs and squared jaws of greco-roman athleticism are still the idealized male form that has graced EVERY romance novel cover in existence. I’m still waiting for someone to post me a link for a dating site that caters exclusively to women’s fetish of BBMs – Big Beautiful Men – average to good looking, fit, women specifically looking overweight men. Executive Introductions caters to women seeking affluent, influential men, but women just looking for overweight men, that site doesn’t exist.

I wrote this essay in a time well before apps like Tinder and Bumble became household names. Since then (September, 2011) the sexual marketplace has fundamentally shifted to exactly the state I saw it going to then, and all it took to prove it was a handful of fuckingdating’ apps to facilitate Hypergamy. In 8 years women have proven they are every bit as viscerally motivated by men’s physical appeal as I spelled out in this post. Back then I was run up the flagpole for suggesting women were the ones with “unrealistic beauty standards”, now it seem matter of fact.

Of course, the double standard has gotten much worse with respect to men having any sexual selection standards. In Maryland we have the instance of high school boys being pilloried on a global stage for daring to rate their female classmates’ looks on a 1 to 10 scale. Ironically, the the same teen girls who took such offense to this will think nothing of swiping left or right on a potentially lover on Tinder in just a few short years. In fact, they’ll think it’s normal for a woman to base her sexual selection on the physical, yet the same is sexual objectification for men to do the same. Certainly, men will never be allowed to voice their physical preferences without the fear of personal destruction in our Global Village.

About 5-6 months ago, Pat Campbell, my co-host on Red Pill 101, linked me to a pair of stories about how offensive some social justice warriors found it that young men were avoiding trans-gender ‘girls‘ as potential dates. The logic was that more evolved heterosexual young men should feel attraction towards a trans-gender, biological male, if he was presenting himself as a female. The natural sexual selection process for those young men, and by extension all men, was being circumvented by the social imperatives of others.

Pat also linked me to a story where a popular, heterosexual, high school quarterback accepted the Homecoming Dance proposal of another homosexual young man. As expected, the story was written as a heartwarming victory for modern progressivism and a young man “secure in his masculinity” praised as a hero for essentially accepting a social control over his sexual selection process. Naturally, the predictable hate to overcome would be from ‘less evolved’ guys alleging the quarterback was really gay.

This is the pre-written script we expect will follow (the clichéd triumph over homophobia), but the real story here is that a young man’s sexual selection process has been removed from his direct control. If the quarterback had refused the proposal the best he could hope for would be that no story would be written about it – but the more likely story would be him having to defend himself against his homophobia. In essence, the threat of a global online mob ruining his future makes accepting the proposal a necessity.

In 2019 men’s control over their sexual selectivity is something women don’t want to hear about. Part of ensuring that Hypergamy is the defining social dynamic today includes exercising as much control over men’s sexual selection process as possible. As fluid as men’s selection naturally is, it’s still out of women’s total control. The method to that control is social pressure. Women’s need to insure against their own Existential Fear of pairing with an unacceptable guy is so obsessive they will resort to social engineering.

Tinder and Bumble are social engineering programs as much as they are facilitators of women’s Hypergamy. Body Positivity / Fat Acceptance (exclusively for women) is equally a social conditioning effort. But for these and more the latent purpose is the same – convincing men to repress their evolved sexual selection proclivities in favor of accepting women’s selection process as the ‘correct’ one. The Cardinal Rule of Sexual Strategies states that for on sex’s strategy to succeed the other’s must be compromised or abandoned. In today’s feminine-primary social order, the Feminine Imperative wants nothing less than complete abandonment from men – and it will use every social and political means available to insure men do.

Men must be raised up and conditioned from the earliest age to accept women’s strategy and their role in it as the only acceptable one. Men’s selection of a mate must be made for him according to women’s standards. Many times I’m asked how to go about “vetting for a wife”. I’m asked what the criteria, what aspects, what traits should a woman possess to make her “marriage material”. From a Red Pill perspective a lot of what I lay out seems highly offensive to the sensibilities of men and women conditioned by the Feminine Imperative. But the qualities, and the reasons I define them being desirable, are nothing any man who is invested in his own sexual strategy wouldn’t find mundane.

It’s not difficult to figure out what attributes in women would make for a good pairing – what’s offensive is that a man would ever have the temerity to require a woman to possess them at all.

It’s offensive to feminized sensibilities for a man to speak aloud the things he wants from a woman. How dare he ever have the presence of mind to create a list of acceptable qualities for a potential long term mate. Who is he to make demands? Has he not learned that Hypergamy and women’s needs now define his existence?

I’ve written in the past about how women commodify their own sexuality. We’ve pandered to the security needs of women for so long they feel entitled to their being met. We’ve developed a social order that’s prime directive is to insure against women’s Existential Fear of ever having to worry about a bad Hypergamous decision. We ensure that they can voluntarily reproduce at will via sperm banks and frozen eggs. We demand that men find them arousing no matter what their physical condition and in spite of 100,000 years of evolved arousal cues. Gynocentrism demands men be nothing more than willing participants in women’s sexual / life strategies.

A day ago I posted this quote on Twitter:

Women only see men as breeding stock or draft animals.

Women and their ‘allies’ lost their collective minds. Follow that link, see for yourself. It’s a litany of middle school blathering and presumption about my motives for making public what most of these feminists confirmed. All the responses are the predictable boilerplate you’d expect from a generation of women used to parroting back what the Village has taught them to respond with for so long.

But what is my observation revealing here? Nothing that we don’t already know – women define the reproductive process in western culture. And again, most of these feminists proudly agree with the observation. They say, “Yeah, as it should be”, while their oblivious male ‘allies’ seek affirmation.

The boys at the Maryland high school got caught in the gynocratic gears. They weren’t properly conditioned to know their place. They did what most guys in high school do, they compare notes, they make comparisons, because they still believed they might be allowed to have a preference of who they want to date, bang, have for a girlfriend, have for a wife. How dare they!

When the Beta Bucks / provisioning side of the Hypergamous equation is more or less accommodated for by the social order the only thing left is Alpha Fucks. This is Hypergamy on a meta-scale. Why would any woman bother with the notion of Value Added to make herself more ‘marriageable’? Men aren’t allowed to have preferences. They should feel lucky that a woman would date them in the first place. Feminism has taught her that if she is to be the ideal Strong Independent Woman® she is “never to do anything for the express pleasure of a man.” And besides, the exciting guys, the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys who she does swipe right on; those guys don’t care about ‘value added’ – they care about fucking.

The New Polyandry I described is an extension of ensuring women’s Existential Fear is always compensated for on a societal level.

The goal of feminism is to remove all constraints on female sexuality while maximally restricting male sexuality.

Roissy

I’ve quoted this in other essays. Usually I’m asked why this would at all be feminists goal?

“You think feminism is all about controlling your dicks?”

In essence, yes, but really it’s about affording women unilateral control over their Existential Fear and absolving them of any consequences for the bad decisions made in controlling for it. In the last essay I stated that Abortion is Eugenics, but isn’t affording women total control of human reproduction eugenics? Isn’t socially engineering and conditioning men’s behavior to accept women’s sexual strategy as the “correct”, normal one eugenics as well?

I would say yes, except, the Sisterhood doesn’t have a ‘master race’ planned. There is no uniform conscious direction to this eugenics. It’s all driven by women natural, evolved mental firmware and impulses – all facilitated by the power afforded to them by men. We’ve unfettered Hypergamy. We’ve allowed women to do something unprecedented in human history, we’ve given women the reins of the direction of human reproduction.

And we’ve done this at the same time we’ve maximally restricted male sexuality. Dr. Jordan Peterson once predicted that in the future any expression of male sexuality will be illegal. I would amend that: any Beta male expression of sexuality will be deemed offensive or illegal.

Published by Rollo Tomassi

Author of The Rational Male and The Rational Male, Preventive Medicine

458 comments on “Sexual Selection & Existential Fear

  1. Weirdly – if women managed via this process of social engineering to perfect their hyergamic strategy whereby they only fuck with the top 10% of alpha males and allow the remainding 90% of cucked men to raise their offspring (the packhorses), wouldn’t this be a good thing for the human race from a purely Darwinian perspective? Don’t the females of every species of life on earth do this?

  2. Really didn’t “ideal of male beauty” change? I see big shift of preference from white men to black men. This to me is pretty big change.

  3. Rollo, this is a very timely essay that men should read and then re-read. Thanks for the work you do.

  4. I remember being taught in 2001 that rating girls was sexual harassment. Confusing, because then I got to university and people rated girls. I concluded, rightly, that it was fine.

  5. But all of this can blown out of the water through genuine masculine, confident alpha behaviour.

    So gents, the solution is simple, learn some wuality game, now!

    And honestly, i cant blame the girls for hating beta behaviour and putting policies to discourage it happening.

    If i was a chick i couldnt imagine anything more creepy and pathetic then have a beta male try to chat me up – off with his head !

  6. @Rollo: are we ready for the sequel to the great looks debate?

    My take on it to start it off.

    Absent anything else, women do have a “looks ideal”. It is not 100% uniform, but certainly not “dad bods”, and certainly preference for tall over short etc., mostly they center around the lean with 6-pack type (think Brad Pitt in his prime), but there are e.g. a sizable minority who are actually into the huge bodybuilder type (think Arnie in his prime) etc.

    But other alpha traits trump that in person, Game over looks etc.

    I think we all pretty much agree on this being the essential of it, but some of us lean a bit more into the looks side and others lean a bit more into the game side.

  7. True story….Before I discovered the Red Pill and Game I always thought I wasn’t “allowed” to go for the hottest girl in the club, bar or whatever social situation I was in.

    Instead I played it “cool” going for the ugly friend to show I was “open-minded”. As ridiculous as this line of thinking is…it was my go-to rationalization for NOT approaching.

  8. Off topic but worth sharing….

    “Boardroom bandits only too quick to shoot messenger”

    The Australian (National, Australia). (Mar. 30, 2019)
    by Janet Albrechtsen

    No wonder a select group of powerful women piled on when their little ruse was rumbled

    Hell hath no fury like a woman outed as a member of a cosy, lucrative little boardroom club.

    Spare a thought for former competition tsar Graeme Samuel, who this week pointed out that the walls built around an exclusive group of female board members were so impenetrable only a nuclear bomb could blow it open to other women.

    Going by the hysterical over-reaction and silly indignation from members of a women’s club who get appointed to multiple board seats across the country, this bloke must have hit one heck of a sensitive nerve.

    The truth is that a Norwegian phenomenon has come our way.

    In Norway, a small club of female directors was so tight after the government mandated a 40 per cent quota for women on boards, it became known as the Golden Skirts.

    Between 2007 and 2010, after the quota came into effect in 2006, four times as many women as men held 16 board positions, and twice as many women as men held between 13 and 16 board positions. That is busy. And lucrative.

    Well, the gig is up. In Australia, even without a quota law, women have masterminded their own Golden Skirts club.

    For too long, discussion has only ever been behind closed doors, by both men and women.

    Experienced women trying to break into senior boardrooms have watched the club in action, gathering more board seats. Experienced men have been told by headhunters drawing up shortlists of board candidates that if they are not wearing a skirt, don’t bother applying, no matter how qualified you are.

    Proxy advisers will tell you, again only privately, that there is a small group of women who, how shall we say this, are “very busy” and “getting busier”.

    Never mind the silence; the numbers give the game away.

    Research by governance firm Ownership Matters shows that at the end of last year, 38 female directors in Australia held three or more ASX 200 board seats. There were 25 men in the same position.

    At the end of last month not much changed, according to data gathered by the Australian Institute of Company Directors, with 32 women holding three ASX 200 board positions compared with 26 men in the same position. Whereas four women held four board positions, only one man did.

    Samuel did not ignore the men’s club. But there is a glaring difference. Many more qualified men make up the men’s club, which means when you pick a member of that club, you don’t know in advance that he may end up being rather mediocre in the role.

    By contrast, targets to get 30 per cent or 40 per cent of women into board seats within a short timeframe, mean that corporate Australia is institutionalising female mediocrity.

    When you appoint a woman, you knowingly risk choosing a less qualified woman to fill a female-targeted seat.

    Unless you pick from the few very experienced female board directors. And, hey presto, that dilemma means members of the Golden Skirts club get busier and richer still.

    The Golden Skirts don’t want to talk about this difference between the directors’ clubs of men and women.

    In fact, there is much that miffed Golden Skirts would rather we not mention.

    Hence the scorn poured on Samuel by Sue Morphet, president of Chief Executive Women, chairwoman of National Tiles and a director of Noni B and Asaleo Care. She said she had to check the date because his comments were so “last century”.

    Samuel is not a dinosaur. His language may have been in search of a headline but, as the country’s former competition regulator, he can spot a lack of competition – be it in the boardroom or between supermarket titans.

    Other women with multiple board positions, such as Rebecca McGrath and Nicola Wakefield-Evans, piled on Samuel too. McGrath accused him of stoking the “gender wars”.

    The ploy is twofold. Shame Samuel so others will not dare speak the truth either. And to paint any discussion as illegitimate, all part of a war, for goodness’ sake. Peace on their terms means we don’t discuss the club.

    The Golden Skirts want to control the conversation about their good fortune, the power and riches that come from their multiple board seats. They imagine they can lay down the boundaries of what can be said, indulged by obsequious nods from men such as those Male Champions of Change who flock to promote women because it gives them a public glow of goodness. Men such as Gordon Cairns, who came out swinging in support of the status quo, joined the founding champions in 2010.

    You don’t need to have the nous of a former competition tsar to notice how the cosy women’s club in Australia came about, bolstering the careers of the Golden Skirts at the expense of other women.

    In 2015, the AICD called for ASX 200 companies to fill 30 per cent of boards seats with women by the end of 2018.

    Last year, Wakefield-Evans pushed for 40 per cent targets for women on boards by 2022.

    Similar targets over the years have two critical components. First, the targets are aimed at getting women into non-executive board seats rather than into jobs at the executive level of companies.

    Targets at the executive level, across the long term, would have been much more productive for many more women and better for companies in nurturing talent from a wider pool. But targets at the executive level would take longer, involve careful planning and training of women, and would not help create a cosy women’s club of non-executive directors.

    The Golden Skirts understand supply and demand in a capitalist world.

    Targets for female directors turned the existing small pool of qualified female directors into highly sought-after boardroom commodities, delivering power and riches through sheer scarcity.

    It did not suit the women’s club to throw support behind targets for women in executive roles. That was too long term. It would rob them of their chance to cash in. Worse, it would mean a pipeline of a highly skilled class of women with real executive experience who would compete with club members in due course.

    Better to set boardroom targets, pick up a suite of swanky board seats and waft around like a role model for women.

    The second way the women’s club entrenched their positions was by attaching tight deadlines to targets, exacerbating the scarcity issue and driving up the economic value of the existing pool.

    The combination of these two factors has been a huge disservice to the cause of other women.

    It has meant that in a short time, the wrong kind of women get promoted, and they keep getting promoted as their LinkedIn profiles grow.

    If targets had started at the executive level, it would have cultivated, across the long haul, a group of women with chief executive or C-suite experience, providing a larger pool of competent women with line experience appointed to boards in their 50s.

    Instead, boardrooms include a batch of women who are too young, overcrowded with lawyers, investment bankers and management consultants, and lacking real-life corporate experience.

    The Golden Skirts in Australia have shown that they did not need quotas to entrench their power and boost their bank balances at the expense of other women, which is why they piled on Samuel this week to denounce him for saying the bleeding obvious.

    Even if you believe that targets are needed to get women into the nation’s boardrooms, the way it has been done has turned a small group of existing female directors into boardroom bandits at the expense of deeper, more effective change for a broader group of women.


    In part, I see the Golden Skirts as the unintended consequences of trying to interfere with the natural order of things.

    Push a system that overly enables women and certain women will game the system to their advantage and then they will howl like stuck pigs when the benefits that they have gained by gaming the system are questioned.

    These women don’t give a f*ck about women as a group. To these women, other women are competitors and men are barriers to more money, status and prestige.

    A pox on them all. I hope the companies they work for all fail terribly.

  9. In that long string of tweets this one stands out:

    This tweet screams “I never read the book, but I saw the movie.” It was James Whale who made the Creature strong and simple, not Mary Shelley.

    Its true, in the book Frankenstein (the creature) isn’t simple minded. He’s a brooding, murderous psychopath, who’s also inhumanly strong. I think Mary Shelley may have inadvertently revealed what women actually desire in a man.

  10. Another excellant read Rolllo.

    Knowing what I know now about society, the feminine imperitive and what I learnt off Prostitutes (trust me, you get the unfettered, hypergamous truth off an Escort) my mindset has totally changed towards women and how I see myself as a man in the world.

    I have not become a MGTOW. I date women and I want to have sex with 80% of the women I meet. That’s biological. But now I have an indifference towards women no matter if she is a 5 or she is a 10 bikini model. I am no longer a pawn in her hypergamous reality. ‘I know Kung Fu’.

  11. Is the power given to women now really “unprecedented in human history”? I highly doubt it. This seems to be actually what happens in every civilization, society, village of human apes in one form or another. Those societies and civilizations that gave women more and more power to choose DID NOT SURVIVE. Where do you think the idea of arranged marriages and shame based socities of the past come from? That did not come from nowhere, it came directly in response to women’s hypergamous choices. The thing that has changed is technology amplifying that hypergamy and state power repressing the majority of male’s power to do anything about it.

  12. “Women and their ‘allies’ lost their collective minds.”

    That^^ is indicative of what nonsense men deal with. This is not an indication of collective strength. It is a group shit test flail to be ignored.

    There is NOTHING to fear about feminists and their ilk. They have neither the mental wherewithal to tolerate the verbal truth and in the unspoken SMP they fare even worse. Hence the outrage. These people are unhappy and unlucky.

    Don’t play the outrage game and you’ll be happier and more successful.

  13. From Rollo’s twatter…

    https://www.mtlblog.com/news/montreal/montreals-concordia-university-is-warning-students-about-suspicious-strangers-harassing-females-on-campus

    Whether this is a more sinister plot to lure women away from campus or an equally unforgivable system of “pickup artists” scheming to take advantage of Montreal students, Concordia has taken the proper first steps to ensure their student body is at ease.

    Careful playas!

  14. Excellent insights, as usual, Rollo.

    As individual men, though, there isn’t much we can do to change the system as it is. Being aware of it is important, of course, and so that’s always useful — situational and environmental understanding is a key to success. But beyond that, focusing on this stuff tends to detrimental to success, because it proves to be a big distraction that is not relevant at all, really, on the micro (i.e., personal) level in terms of reaching the goals you personally have in your own life.

    So understand this stuff well, file it in your brain under situational awareness. And then get back to living in the real world, and reaching your own goals in your own frame. There’s still lots of individual success to be had in this world, despite the stuff in this article, for individual men who take the reins into their own hands and proceed from their own mental point of origin in a masterful, dynamic way. That’s far more important, and far more effective in your life, than trying to “change the system” — which is basically impossible.

  15. https://www.instagram.com/tv/Bvm2KE_jmHT/

    Problem glasses… noted!

    Comments…

    swed_lifestyle
    I know who is this guy, it’s just an autist chinees who want to get lay and check up pick up artiste on youtube, he just akward on socialising because he’s little bit retarded so he use proces of precise questions cause he don’t know what to do when its out of this conversation

    swed_lifestyle
    Its not humain trafiking but just some dumb fuckers who trying get laid

  16. @Rollo – Great essay, but I still have a fundamental disagreement with you boiling all this down to “existential fears”. We have mating strategies – failing at them can cause fear. But the underlying motivation isn’t fear, it’s the desire to fuck and pair up and reproduce. Would love to hear a substantive response to this critique. I actually think seeing this as an “existential fear” is Blue Pill thinking.

    Other points…

    • As you note, women do not have a gameplan or an endpoint as a political or social force, just as none of the other SJW victim groups do. Nietzsche predicted how our public intellectual discourse would descend into a hash of nonsense as women “masculinized” themselves and attempted to be men’s intellectual equals. This means they will crash the system, it’s inevitable. Cuz most chicks couldn’t run a Cub Scout Troop meeting (they are good Den Mothers though). Get that – despite all the BS run at us in the past 100 years about how awesome women are, in fact, their ideas and priorities haven’t been honed by reason, skepticism and reality the way that men’s have, due to male social order. Our society is being driven by revolutionary idiots who have no idea what their endgame is. Get that – you are correct to feel like we are on an insane ride off a cliff. Yup.
    • I think there are pockets of resistance to all this in women too. I realize that my selection process includes a woman having a bit of the Red Pill herself, which many women actually have a bit of even if they don’t ID that way. Look at how few women ID as feminists – good starting point. I offer doubts about radical feminism early and often, and if chicky-poo grimaces, I escalate. If she gets shitty, fuck off, next. I’m starting to believe that I can carve out my own little world and that over time more and more people are doing this too. I’m forming new networks with these groups, as they do exist in the communities I’m in. My new band is guys who don’t fit in, but are making their own way through the world on their own terms. The women who end up fucking me appreciate the lack of Blue Pillness, even if I’m their dirty little secret, hehe. The guys I shoot with, ditto, not part of the herd.

    Maybe the mainstream herd is going to get smaller and smaller as we grow our alternate social circles??? I’m not sure about this at all, and really, predictions are very hard to make. And in the end, I’m about making my life work, not fixing the world. But I can’t help but note that the woods of New Hampshire make for lots of exceptions and alternate realities, actually. You could say many who transplant here are seeking exactly that. Sure, we have many Prog-Marxist scumbags, but still, there are many who aren’t going along with them at all. I’m finding them and forming new social circles and leaving the Prog-Marxists out. Like try to imagine showing up at my shooting club with a Hillary hat on, lol. Or a Che tee shirt…

  17. ” . . . the underlying motivation isn’t fear, it’s the desire to fuck and pair up and reproduce.”

    I don’t have an existential fear of snakes and leopards, I just have a desire to live.

  18. Kfg beat me to it.

    “We have mating strategies – failing at them can cause fear.”

    Non-sentients have mating strategies alone. They don’t fear, as they do not recognize their eventual death. They act on pure instinct alone. They do not have freewilling actions.

    Sentience renders man aware of his mortality. We understand our death and thus we consciously recognize our decisions are consequential. We have a choice to fuck or not. Our animal drive impels us to fuck but our higher order sentience suppresses the compulsion to rape whomever, whatever, in however way it suits us.

    For good reason.

    Some men prefer ignoring the above and their impending death, nor what they do, calling all of it good.

    That allows for a clean conscious even when their life is blowing up as nothing is ever their fault and thus don’t have to change their m.o. beyond evo-bio.

    Might as well climb back into the trees.

  19. I cannot tell you how much I appreciate the content you are currently putting out. (Videos included) Not to be greedy, but do we have a release date for Book 4 yet? I honestly want to frame your books and put them on my walls…please take care of yourself!

  20. Since men consciously choose not to get the evo-bio right….sex changes, homosexuality, forcing gender equalism, gay marriage….animals don’t do this, nor think to btw….all man’s downstream consequence is fucked up too.

    Grammar then logic then rhetoric.

    In that order, skip no steps.

    We must be good at being men before all else.

  21. @KFG – I disagree. It turns out the fear of snakes is heritable, it’s also true of other predators that are dangerous to humans. I have a back of the brain reaction to such predators which fires off well ahead of any conscious thought. My encounter with a mountain lion comes to mind, once my brain recognized the silhouette against the dying light of dusk on my lake, my legs started running and I was in fight-flight mode 10 seconds before my conscious mind new what was happening.

    I don’t have that kind of fear when it comes to mating strategy. I’m not playing semantic games, but perhaps I’m missing something?

  22. “It turns out the fear of snakes is heritable, it’s also true of other predators that are dangerous to humans.”

    Evo-bio. All’s in order.

    “I don’t have that kind of fear when it comes to mating strategy. ”

    Really?

    Fuck your hb 9++ gf in the front yard recently? No?

    Then you do.

  23. The problem is that “beta” is a specific circumstance any man can find himself in, at any time. While it may be the wrong strategy initially, everything leads to beta. Getting married itself is transition to beta, in a way. Any loss of income, power, or fame is transition to beta. Getting sick is beta. Heck Tom Brady will become a beta once he stops playing. Heck witness what happened to Jeff Bezos, apparently becoming a multi billionaire doesn’t protect you from the eventual hypergamous judgment.

    “Alpha” is being a supremely fit, tall, handsome, confident, genetically superior male with good enough income in your 20s and 30s. Anything less than that is beta.

    America is now headed to disaster. The impossible standard has been placed on us: essentially, we all must compete, get a huge income, pay up for huge houses, cars, and college “education” and live forever while remaining impeccably fit, social, perfect at all times. This is unique to a civilization that embraces deregulated financial capitalism, female empowerment and hypergamy, and multiracialism. It’s a mugs game. America is now designed so nobody can be happy, the perpetual treadmill to nowhere.

    I bet most of you men reading this are instinctively conservative and Republican. Does it dawn on you that those guys are all alpha corporate men who want to write everything in their favor in perpetuity so they can accumulate endless dollar wealth? That they don’t give a shit about the “average” white man or any other man for that matter? And in order to do that, your wealth must decrease, and America must remain open to labor from all over the world?

    But you keep convincing yourselves this isn’t the case…no, it’s those evil feminist and soy boy, negro and immigrant loving liberal Democrats. That may be the case, but that proves my point: you have no political representation. Zero.

    If you are man reading this and you aren’t alpha and rich, you have no representation in America anymore. You are a a slave, a donkey.

  24. Animals don’t fear. They react on instinct. So did ScribblerG innitially by the lion. It’s reflexive, though ScribblerG has the capacity to subdue his instincts if needed.

    That is rational fear as he recognizes the lion mouth on his neck is badness.

    Irrational fears are consciously chosen fears that aren’t directly threatening. They are in your mind. Like ExCartoonist shunning all women because he got burned in his divorce or ScribblerG and his inability to relate to women beyond cum dumpsters as he too was burned in his divorce….at least here on these pages.

    I’m not saying women aren’t useful as such though ScribblerG is stuck out of fear. He fears having more consequence than buying shit and banging and preening about it here.

  25. Nobody has anything to say about the gay guy? The both of them being spics would earn them both progressive points in their social circles for gayness. But those social circles are surely patrolled by power-broker dykes. You can’t put a dress on me. That’s black people shit.

  26. So the Chevy Chase girls in the WaPo story and the high school admins are proud of the “consciousness raising” they did of the boys who made the hotness list?

    They did no such thing. They turned every one of those boys into Trump voters. All of ’em. Even the newly-minted ally who is confabbing (confapping?) with the chief protestress to help “prevent” incidents of future HB list-making by boychiks. (Also she won’t fuck him anyway).

    Oh they’ll toe the party line in class, at school assemblies. Easy to do with fingers crossed.

    But at home they’ll flail around and then maybe discover Cernovich, or Vox, or Dalrock, or even Roosh, or Heartiste. They’ll drink that in. Find relief. They’ll be told they have value as men, and it’s OK to be a man, even if their parents and girl classmates want to stomp them flat. (Maybe it’s snake oil some purvey, but hey, a couple of spoonfuls of snake oil can go down pretty smooth, enough to get all the shit out.)

    Because SHAMING DOES NOT WORK. Never has, never will. Certainly not PUBLIC shaming. Not in this context. Not in academia. Certainly not in elections. I have yet to see an election anywhere won by a candidate who tried to shame the electorate, telling them to FOAD.

    And no the girls weren’t brave. What would be brave is if they, on their own, confronted one or more of the boys with the list and had a one-on-one out with them. But they didn’t, because they didn’t have that fortitude. They enlisted the admins and faculty to arrange the waterboarding to be done in public, in front of everyone and the press.

    So yes the need for screed must be something more elemental: the schadenfreude and glee watching betas suffer. Because you can.

    Just like the Party does in 1984: because they can.

  27. @Eh – ? I never saw women as “cum dumpsters” – I just knocked them off their pedestals. In fact, my approach to game was given by Tyler from RSD and Mystery – you must leave a woman better off than you found them. What I learned is that many, many women want to be sluts, and many are covertly sluts in addition to many who are openly sluts. They aren’t special or fragile, they are just girls. I suspect deep down in my heart that every woman could be a slut under the right circumstances too…

    I actually appreciate women even more for the sweet, ineffable aspect of femininity that can warm up a room and makes me smile. But hey, many guys here want to put me in some box of being an animal or a monster so they can dismiss my challenges to the BS-laden status quo of so much of the manosphere and this very comment section, like I’m not shocked.

    But for the record, in fact, it’s when I took on PUA and game seriously that my anger with women fell away. Like 3 years ago…You should try and keep up and stop trying to categorize me and other men here with your glib throwaway lines.

    And of course your silly line about me not wanting to bang my former HB9 on my front lawn isn’t about being afraid due to my mating strategy. It’s another fear, that of being naked in public. I believe that is social conditioning, Iike it doesn’t fire off autonomically and it’s not a fear I would ever mention, even if you asked me to list 1000 fears I have. It’s a bullshit comment.

    But I don’t expect any better from you. You do have moments of clarity though, which I enjoy when they occur.

  28. @Revolution – Your vast ignorance and arrogance is only matched by you big mouth. There is so little correct in your statement about Beta and Alpha, I can’t even start to debunk it. I did so in my last post on the last blog piece. You have no idea how to distinguish between Alpha/Beta (terms of social dominance in dominance hierarchies), SMV and looks and how they interplay for sexual selection. Also your paranoid-conspiracy view of the corporate world signals your obvious low social status and lack of interaction with such people. As an executive who operates in the world you bloviate about, I giggle at you.

    You are correct about one thing though. Revolution is coming…And you will make good cannon fodder.

  29. “But hey, many guys here want to put me in some box of being an animal or a monster…”

    Just the opposite.

    There are two things of perpetual existential value in your life and I’d bet you dime to dollar you’d even consider giving up yours to save theirs.

    Ironically, they are female.

  30. I have a topic request. I’ve never understood why women are soo obsessed with ‘the story’ – meaning, how she met her husband/boyfriend/whatever. I see this emphasis not just with female friends taking every opportunity to tell their ‘story’, but also in media. There’s even a tv show specifically devoted to this – How I Met You Mother (perhaps the ultimate blue pill series ever created).

  31. @ ScribblerG

    As I like the sound of my voice, I just can’t help myself. I think you like the sound of yours, too. That’s why we get along swimmingly.

    So from a friend to a friend, here goes:

    “I just knocked them off their pedestals.”

    If treating women the way you’re do is about knocking them off the pedestal that means you consider them on a pedestal before you knock them off. You put them there in the first place, at least initially but my guess is they are still there afterwards too.

    So technically, you yet still have them on a pedestal and that is a source of pride for you. That is, having sex with a woman whom you pedestalize.

    IMO you are yet living your life for others and stuff which have nothing to do with you..

    That’s weak. You deserve better.

  32. EhIntellect
    Animals don’t fear. They react on instinct

    Fear is instinctual. Every mammal has that instinct.

    Semantic rabbit trails generally are not productive or useful…

  33. Fred Flange, cruising the Beltway in his new auto-mo-bile
    Because SHAMING DOES NOT WORK. Never has, never will. Certainly not PUBLIC shaming.

    Shaming works on girls. All boys are now commanded to act like girls. Therefore the shaming must continue until all boys act just like girls.

    This will work out so well. For the few, the proud, the un-gelded.

  34. But wait, there’s more Fred Flange

    And no the girls weren’t brave. What would be brave is if they, on their own, confronted one or more of the boys with the list and had a one-on-one out with them. But they didn’t, because they didn’t have that fortitude are all girls. They enlisted the admins and faculty to arrange the waterboarding to be done in public, in front of everyone and the press.

    Because that’s how the “mean girls” control the rest of the girl herd, and boys must, must, must be Just Like Girls now, so…

    The FI is very obvious in this DC story.

  35. “You either need more submissive shoes or ones that can take a stand and enrich your life.”

    It’s submissive enough to cower from me if it must, or run if it can, but it’s too stupid to just move 50′ to the east and not be my problem anymore. I suppose it’s enriching my garden, but only on the remains of tearing up my garden, so I’m afraid I lack a sense of gratitude for it.

  36. “Fear is instinctual. Every mammal has that instinct.”

    Instinct is more preprogrammed reflex, it isn’t sentient fear and yes we’re getting into the semantic weeds….lol.

  37. @Sentient
    From Rollo’s twatter…
    https://www.mtlblog.com/news/montreal/montreals-concordia-university-is-warning-students-about-suspicious-strangers-harassing-females-on-campus

    Whether this is a more sinister plot to lure women away from campus…
    So they can be raped I presume?

    or an equally unforgivable system of “pickup artists” scheming to take advantage of Montreal students, Concordia has taken the proper first steps to ensure their student body is at ease.
    So betas cold approaching young women is considered morally equivalent to trying to rape them?

  38. CSI
    So betas cold approaching young women is considered morally equivalent to trying to rape them?

    Yep. Pretty much.

  39. “So betas cold approaching young women is considered morally equivalent to trying to rape them?”

    “Yep. Pretty much.”

    Nah, these chicks didn’t like the complementary cold open. Me thinks they’re masochists. They don’t like themselves very much and prefer a rhetorical butt smack.

    Stick to an immediate neg with pseudo-smart chicks…..

    “Your face makeup doesn’t match your neck.”

    “You’ve thick ankles for a smart chick.”

    “Your bra padding’s uneven. You smuggling a lime and coconut?”

    “Your hoops are big enough that circus dogs could jump through them.”

  40. Emilia Clarkes 5’1 or 1.57m tall, she’s like a hobbit. id fuck her but it would be embarrassing to be seen in public with her.
    Seriously though we live in democratic societys, vote for whose going to get us laid more or even out the playing field.

  41. EhIntellect
    Nah, these chicks didn’t like the complementary cold open… by a Beta. Because being opened by a Beta is rape.

    FIFY. No charge.

    Your remedial reading is the previous essay by Rollo. Pay attention to the part about “Women ____, ____, ____ Betas”.

    Your exercise in situational awareness is to find out what Canadian Uni is referred to and why it is infamous.

  42. @AR

    So betas cold approaching young women is considered morally equivalent to trying to rape them?

    Yep. Pretty much.

    How can women tell that a beta is approaching? And what if the beta is very handsome? Or what if an approaching alpha is ugly?

  43. @AR

    OK fine.

    So you’re taking the side of PUA j. All a guy needs is looks and everything else is irrelevant. If a very good looking guy did the exact same thing would these girls have acted differently?

    We have no idea what they looked like other than some ironically racist-y descriptions. They didn’t discuss the quality of the pickup but for they opened with unoriginal complements.

    I admit these guys were probably tuning up their pick up artistry skills (for which I commend them) but ATM were not very good at it. But IMO, the beta has nothing to do with it. The guys fumbled around with basic pick up. The girls didn’t like the basic pick up but this has nothing to do with alpha or beta.

    What you’re assuming is it a girls wanted experience. You are so fucking flat wrong.

    Rollo writes something and you repeat it. For once quote yourself, why don’t ‘cha and people will take you more seriously, btw. These girls are not searching for Alpha. They’ve no idea what a normal intersexual dynamic is. The Trouble Glasses Girl’s Club is sloshing around in a sea of terror that knife-to-neck rape is one date away.

    There’s no way convincing these women otherwise. Fuck ‘em. They aren’t all that anyways.

    A lot of young-to-older women today are self-destructive, self-limiting, don’t have a fucking clue what a feminine woman should be. A lot of guys are in the same boat. Both sexes literally don’t know what Alpha is….as in to actually be masculine. These women have no idea how to normally socialize sexually without freaking the fuck out. Palma?

    One who’s-her-face co-ed posts a panic-stricken video and AR jumps to old man outrage about it.

    Moreover, AR, you egghead prattle on endlessly RP 101 as if you know what the fuck you’re talking about but you’re not out there. Everyone can tell that. I don’t hold that against you. But do us all a favor and stay in your wheelhouse. You don’t do pick up. You barely can pick yourself up out of your bed every morning. You don’t cold open, you don’t warn open, you don’t hot open. you don’t open. All you do is open up your laptop at tippy tap away.

    Nothing personal.

  44. EhIntellect
    So you’re taking the side of PUA j.

    Really?

    All a guy needs is looks and everything else is irrelevant.

    Where did I write such a thing?

  45. EhIntellect
    What you’re assuming is it a girls wanted experience.

    How do you know what I assume?

    Rollo writes something and you repeat it. For once quote yourself, why don’t ‘cha and people will take you more seriously, btw.

    Someone’s triggered…

    These girls are not searching for Alpha. They’ve no idea what a normal intersexual dynamic is. The Trouble Glasses Girl’s Club is sloshing around in a sea of terror that knife-to-neck rape is one date away.

    What Canadian Uni is it, again?

    There’s no way convincing these women otherwise. Fuck ‘em. They aren’t all that anyways.

    How do you know this?

    A lot of young-to-older women today are self-destructive, self-limiting, don’t have a fucking clue what a feminine woman should be. A lot of guys are in the same boat. Both sexes literally don’t know what Alpha is….as in to actually be masculine. These women have no idea how to normally socialize sexually without freaking the fuck out….

    …and they should all get off your lawn, eh?

    One who’s-her-face co-ed posts a panic-stricken video and AR jumps to old man outrage about it.

    What “old man outrage” are you referring to? Be specific.

    Moreover, AR, you egghead prattle on endlessly RP 101 as if you know what the fuck you’re talking about but you’re not out there. Everyone can tell that. I don’t hold that against you. But do us all a favor and stay in your wheelhouse. You don’t do pick up. You barely can pick yourself up out of your bed every morning. You don’t cold open, you don’t warn open, you don’t hot open. you don’t open. All you do is open up your laptop at tippy tap away.

    Definitely triggered. Get some Ovaltine, go sit on the porch for a while and calm down.

    I promise to stay off of your lawn.

  46. “What “old man outrage” are you referring to? Be specific.”

    The subtext of all you write is intersexually contentious. Your m.o. is to manipulate younger men who hang out here to align themselves against women as, you choose, the FI, the hypergamy, or weak emotional women (redundant) who post YouTube vids, all out to get them.

    That’s an abuse of your position and disgraceful.

  47. ” Get some Ovaltine, go sit on the porch for a while and calm down..”

    Oddly enough, I’ve taken to drinking Ovaltine again from time to time. Never thought about drinking it on the porch though.

    When the weather breaks.

  48. The more analysis by Rollo the bigger the questions get, pretty soon Rollo you are going to have to go into the spiritually/religious world to make any sense of it. Women want this/women want that/oh it depends what time of the month it is, it depends on context, it depends on whether the man is good looking/bad looking, to infinity and beyond!! This is no doubt true but it is leading us nowhere really as far as I can see other than deeper in the whole of the craziness of a woman’s mind, in my opinion not very productive and just a cover by nature for the fact it’s all genetics/looks and nothing else, to insure future survival of the offspring as these genetic/looks lottery winners don’t tend to stick around and hence the losers of the genetic lottery have to step in and pay for something they didn’t buy.

    As someone here I think it’s KFG has said for many years , “it’s babies all the way down” or something along those lines. I didn’t get what he meant for many years , but now I get it perfectly. Women are simply searching for the best genetic material available, and it comes down to physique/looks as those are the most easily identifiable characteristics for good genetic material in a man from a woman. So in terms of breeding it’s all looks all the way for women, if you can show money/status/etc. then yeah that changes the calculus but it’s negotiated genetic desire, you have in essence bought her with game/charm/money/status/etc but at the animal level she didn’t really want you, she settled. Everything else is bullshit and dressing up animalistic/hindbrain behavior by nature, because we refuse to accept the hindbrain/animal aspect to human reproduction, I admit it’s a tough pill to swallow if you didn’t win the genetic game(which most men don’t) but it is what it is.

    Man has always attempted to tame the natural world around him as it can beneficial yet at the same time destructive if not treated with the respect it deserves. We have unleashed women to their animalistic nature with zero restrictions and pandoras box has been opened and men(not women) are going to have to pay a very very heavy price in the future for such a costly mistake as civilization as we know it breaks down. Prior civilizations knew this hence the monogamy/marriage contract which is a stabilizing force where both parties had to make a compromise.

    It is what it is gentlemen, tough pill to swallow if you are not a winner but at least now you know and that’s half the battle. Nature cannot be conquered with the mind itself, yes the mind can think of a solution but nature only understands physical action.

    As men the prefrontal cortex is both a blessing and a curse….

  49. “The goal of feminism is to remove all constraints on female sexuality while maximally restricting male sexuality.

    Roissy

    (in the future any expression of male sexuality will be illegal. I would amend that: any Beta male expression of sexuality will be deemed offensive or illegal.)

    Are performances won’t stop even in the face of annihilation
    It would help to have a solution to how to navigate culture as a male modeling behavior to one another. Did some mentoring at a school today and Jacob a young boy who was around 11 kept lookng at me as an example of being a male.

  50. From Rational Twatter…


    https://sites.google.com/site/mrsmnoates/_/rsrc/1294246263457/config/100_5058.JPG

    https://sites.google.com/site/mrsmnoates/about-me

    About Me

    Who I am? I am a high school teacher, a motivational friend, an Xtreme Bootcamp member, an avid reader, and an undisputed social person. As a child, I was raised in Aurora, Colorado where I spent most of my childhood participating in competitive swimming where I turned my talent into my dream and received a college athletic scholarship. I use my thirst for knowledge, my imagination of possibilities, and my search for information as a catalyst for helping others.

    What is my expertise and beneficial skills? With just over 7 years of education, hands-on, real-world experience, I have earned a BACHELOR’S degree in Business-Marketing and a MASTER’S degree in Education, all from the University of Nevada, Reno. Currently, I am using my strong leadership capabilities and my relentless perseverance toward becoming a determined and dedicated educator.

    My attitude? Is very “committed in my decisions, but flexible in my approach.

    My goal for others? Inspire people to positively change their lives.

    What is my website designed for? Mrs. Oates Classroom website is an integrated media platform created for one glorious purpose: to engage, inspire, and empower teenage humans and young adults, while helping them gain access to to anything and everything they need to be successful individuals who can find the courage and common ground to not only finish high school, but excel in their studies.

    Her ‘words of the Week” page…

    Magnanimous: Adj.- forgiving; unselfish
    Malicious: Adj.- spiteful; vindictive
    Marred: Adj.- damaged
    Meander: V.- to on a course; to go aimlessly
    Melancholy: N.- depressing; gloom

    lolz

    https://static.wixstatic.com/media/5668a0_79a696dc3e8944ce96e34841ba1a9a0a~mv2.jpg

    https://static.wixstatic.com/media/5668a0_29e1576a0a7248ddb550e15e20484f12~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_630,h_315,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/5668a0_29e1576a0a7248ddb550e15e20484f12~mv2.jpg

  51. @Eh – What bafflegarb you emit. ‘Taking women off of a pedestal is putting them on another one” or some weak bullshit. I’m not here to play word games. And of course it was me who put them on a pedestal – but the entire femcentric world and Blue Pill social conditioning makes us do this. I don’t have anything else on a pedestal. You seem to think that caring for my daughter and granddaughter means putting them on a pedestal, how sad for you.

    Why do you always try and get into it with me?

  52. @scribblerg [ #272495 ……I still have a fundamental disagreement with you boiling all this down to “existential fears”. We have mating strategies – failing at them can cause fear. But the underlying motivation isn’t fear, it’s the desire to fuck and pair up and reproduce. ……seeing this as an “existential fear” is Blue Pill thinking…….I don’t have that kind of fear when it comes to mating strategy. I’m not playing semantic games, but perhaps I’m missing something?..]

    Come on Scribs you are conflating ‘Existential’ fear versus ‘Instinctual’ fear. There is a difference in wanting to have sex and reproduce versus the existential fear of not propagating one’s genetics. I have an instinctual fear of snakes.

  53. @scribblerg [‘You have no idea how to distinguish between Alpha/Beta (terms of social dominance in dominance hierarchies),’]

    Scribs you keep conflating ‘competency’ hierarchies, alpha animal survival dominance and red pill (Feminine imperative seed need) Alpha intersexual dynamics- again I’ve come to expect more from you

    hopefully Sentient does explain the feminine imperative alpha need to you…….

  54. [Anonymous Reader #272526
    Fred Flange, cruising the Beltway in his new auto-mo-bile]

    reminded me of this

  55. “You seem to think that caring for my daughter and granddaughter means putting them on a pedestal, how sad for you.”

    Nah. Your intent there ^^^^ is correct and aligned with your existential imperatives. You’re yet missing this.

    Elsewhere you’re less aligned.

    That’s all. You do you, my man.

  56. So in terms of breeding it’s all looks all the way for women

    That’s something I wouldn’t wanna step in…Blue Pill shit…women don’t think like men when it comes to sexual attractiveness…

    …I was out at Panera today, getting a bagel after a mall walk…an attractive 23 y.o. Puerto Rican bimbo I barely know was offering me a free beverage and hinting that she’d like to be asked out…”I don’t get out much”…”I’m living with my dad”…”I read a lot of books”…”I’ll never forget our casual dances at [her old store she managed but which closed]” (as she turned herself)…

    …but I’m old and bald and fat (looks = 5), so obviously this couldn’t have happened…

    XD

  57. Oh, and I do enjoy your hyperbolic energy level. You’ve something apparently to prove, with women, with things, with career, and on and on. It’s a bit try-to-hard.

    You’ve moments as a more reasonable guy when we spar. That’s cool.

  58. “Definitely triggered. Get some Ovaltine, go sit on the porch for a while and calm down.

    Reminds me, I need to put the fan on the porch again.

    Blax: It’s windy

    Me: Wednesday? I thought it was Thursday.

    SJF: I’m thirsty too. Let’s get a Coke.

    Blax: I already did some Coke. Reminds me when I got rufied by Whitney Houston…

    Me: Yeah I need to get the roofers out to look at damage because it’s been so windy…

    (rinse and repeat)

  59. She may have a case… [left]

    Mazingo says two partners at her California firm subjected her to “unwanted sexual attention” while simultaneously excluding her from mentorship opportunities and career growth.

    https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/405/2019/04/Mazingo-Tolton-Article-201904030213.jpg

    https://biglawbusiness.com/jones-day-accused-by-female-attorneys-of-sex-bias-unequal-pay

    Lot’s of late 20’s women like this in the professions… wonder how many bearded dudes got passed over for her to get on the team?

  60. 1) All dating apps have internal attractiveness rank for both male and female profiles. Profiles are ranked by number of likes from other users, number of messages received, etc. Again ALL dating apps do this for both male and female. Males get ranked by women. Women get ranked by men. The hot profiles get used by the apps to sell extra features to the lower ranked profiles. That’s how dating apps make money. This issue at the school was that the females didn’t opt-in to any dating app, while many of the pics used to rank them were taken during school. There’s also the issue that any damage might be lasting, as once something goes on the internet it could be hanging out there forever. So then it becomes school bullying issue, and if the principal ignores it he could lose his job these days. 2) Dating apps have shown over and over again, from years of online data analytics, that women are far more brutal than men in ranking profiles. 80% of women only like or message 20% male profiles. While men like or message approx 50% to 66% female profiles depending on the dating app. In other words, women would rather get pumped and dumped by the same subset of top tier males, than invest in relationship with Beta males. Decision making criteria by women on swipe apps is 90% pics. Bascially women are looking to date couple notches more attractive than themselves, or they don’t get motivated to meet up IRL. So yah its an era open hypergamy with women ridining the cock carousel. But we already knew that. The data just makes it all scientific.

  61. @Sentient – She may have a case… [left]”

    So will these law firms need to start eating each other – you take the case against us – we’ll be sure to sue your firm?

  62. “Men aren’t allowed to have preferences”

    Then why cake their faces in cosmetics? The sexual marketplace dictates all non participants must be ready to enter the foray at a moments notice.

    “They should feel lucky that a woman would date them in the first place.”

    Make-up gives women a heightened sense of their own SMV. A woman can now present herself as a goddess with the expectations to match.

    “the Feminine Imperative wants nothing less than complete abandonment from men – and it will use every social and political means available to insure men do.”

    President Trump.

    The Gillette advertisement.

    Douglas Martin breaking up with Yanet Garcia to pursue his career as a professional gamer.

    among many other examples.

    Rollo you make it seem as though men are still asleep at the wheel. We’re passed that. Enough men are awake now and will remain so to usher in the new patriarchy. Not to be confused with the original patriarchy and it’s bastion of blue alphas. The new patriarchy will produce men who are inherently aware of the feminine design and the machinations used to fulfill it. These red alphas will be a better breed of men than the vanguard of which we are a part.

  63. “Men aren’t allowed to have preferences. They should feel lucky that a woman would date them in the first place. ……..I would amend that: any Beta male expression of sexuality will be deemed offensive or illegal.”

    So once upon a time, there was the Seinfield Soup Nazi – No Soup for you
    Now we have the FemNazi – NO PUSSY FOR YOU BETA BOY

  64. “NO PUSSY FOR YOU BETA BOY”

    “I happen to think that overall, beta men fuck more than anybody else. Somewhere right now, there’s a beta male balls deep in some hb8-9” – Blaximus.

  65. J

    Betas absolutely are having sex. Lots of sex.

    The difference is the conditions around it.

    [Blax’s larger point 7 some billion people and growing… Not the result of exclusively Alpha seed.]

  66. @Sentient

    Right. so the quote should read:

    “I would amend that: any gamma/omega male expression of sexuality will be deemed offensive or illegal”.

    https://thenewmodernman.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/five_archetypes.png

    These are your overweight/under 5’4″, ugly autistic guys who can move up in the hierarchy, to beta male status via status and moneymaxxing, but don’t feel it’s worth it (especially with the promise of sex dolls around the corner), because they’ll never be able to get desire sex from attractive girls that just throw their pussy at Alpha males (Looks/Status/Game), during their cock carousel phase. So they check out:

    https://brobible.com/culture/article/millennials-picking-video-games-over-sex/

  67. EhIntellect
    The subtext of all you write is intersexually contentious.

    Sure you didn’t mean to write “intersectionally”? Either way, you probably shouldn’t comment when you’ve been drinking.

    Your m.o. is to manipulate younger men who hang out here to align themselves against women as, you choose, the FI, the hypergamy, or weak emotional women (redundant) who post YouTube vids, all out to get them.

    Lol! You probably shouldn’t comment while using glue, or hallucinogens, or whatever chemistry generated that stack of word salad.

    That’s an abuse of your position and disgraceful.

    What position would that be? In a minute, I’ll get into Butterfly…then Goddess…

  68. ” The new patriarchy will produce men who are inherently aware of the feminine design and the machinations used to fulfill it. These red alphas will be a better breed of men than the vanguard of which we are a part.”

    Bullshit, to be aware of this design is not an easy pill to swallow, I see very little of this among men. There are some guys who are cluing in to the bullshit, but they don’t know the why/how. It’s a zero sum game for women when it comes to the mating/reproduction market.

    You can see it with sperm banks/tinder/online apps, they don’t care if you have game/money/status or not, it’s a cherry on top if you. What they do care about are your genetics , physical appearance is the best indicator of that, everything else is just rationalization by nature and leaves the non genetic winners holding the bag(babies).

    When value is clear the decision is easy, they don’t want to be sold via game, they want to buy based on genetics, don’t you fucking get it!

  69. @Foxguy. Yep that should be totally clear to everyone by now. Women really just want the protector with the genetics now. Women don’t even care about money if they are 9’s and 10’s. They like working and a job and money comes easy to them. I have noticed alpha cops are very, very attractive to women. If they are tall and alpha, that legal authority that they have over other men and can legally carry a gun gives them this golden status with women. This also gives women a certain status over other women, even other women who are married to wealthy men but who don’t have that social authority and power. Sort of shows how far society has fallen. We are living in an authoritarian anarcho tyranny where the average man cannot easily defend himself with legally with lethal force and get away with it without serious reprecussions. We’re basically in a state of war already and women want to be with the ones most equipped for that war. Rollo and his “feminine imperative” as the driving force is just Bullshit. It’s men at the top of the dominance heirachy who are creating these conditions. Yes, women ultimately feed it by voting for more and more tyranny, but it’s still the men at the top of the pyramid that are putting it in effect.

  70. 😁

    Well, i.I’m 6 feet tall( barely) and carry a firearm or two when I feel like it, and give zero fucks about alpha cops.

    You gotta bring ass to kick ass.to

    Learn to resist intimidation at all costs. Let no man or woman intimidate you, regardless of hb ratings or caliber of gun or job description. Flesh and blood, with a weak spot 99% of the time.

    Remember, the most dangerous person is the one you never see coming. If they’re standing right in front of you, they aren’t really that much of a threat. What’s gonna happen is gonna happen. What’s key is how will you react?

    Stand or fall.

    G’night all.

    1. @Blaximus. That’s great but a court of law could give zero fucks of how much of a bad ass you think you are. You get just caught with a firearm in some areas that you “carry because you feel like it, but only some of the time” and you will be facing a fine if not arrest. Then if you were to actually use that firearm you will be facing even worse legal reprecussions, criminally or in civil court. An off duty cop can just flash his badge and show the top of his back up piece to any average citizen to end any potential confrontational event (in most cases). Can you? Didn’t think so. If you were a woman who would you feel would make the most ideal protector in a lawless (for your average man) borderless country that restricts firearms and the use of firearms for self defense? Exactly.

  71. Alpha cops fear lawyers–especially lawyers who used to work for the Police Dept. It helps to actually know a few cops.

    You fight cops with lawyers. It helps to know your way around the courts. Funny how girls can sniff out that sort of competence in a man.

    One place I go, there is no reason to carry a gun. Bouncers will search you if your clothes are loose. And if they aren’t loose, you can’t conceal a weapon from bouncers’ eyes. There has never been a shooting at that bar afaik.

    I have summoned bouncers before to deal with people who are causing trouble. They appreciate clients who notify them of problems early.

  72. @theasdgamer. My comment was about how women psychologically view alpha cops as far as their sexual selection is concerned when it comes to seeking protection and genes when society provides them with everything else on a silver platter, and what makes their panties wet. Not if you are able to legally challenge a cop in court for some direct action after the fact. A lawyer who sues somebody and wins in court after they get their ass beat in the street and their wife gets raped is not going to be viewed as a protector and someone women want to get naked for and have children with. That was my point.

  73. If they are tall and alpha, that legal authority that they have over other men and can legally carry a gun gives them this golden status with women.

    Most states allow concealed carry.

  74. “Most states allow conceal carry”.

    That’s the thing that most people don’t get. Being allowed to conceal carry and having the authority to use the weapon are two different things. As I said, an off duty cop can flash a badge and doesn’t even need to display a gun in order to assume authority in society. Try displaying your conceal carry in order to de-escalate a situation and see what happens. The ability to carry a gun doesn’t give you the authority to use it or the ability to influence people with the authority that a gun AND a badge can. Cops have the state backing them up or at least sympathy from the people they work with, your legal gang if you will, most of the time, and people know this. That’s power. I guess now somebody will tell me that’s what internal affairs is for, lol.

  75. And again I’m only relating that to women and their psychology when it comes to their sexual selection. It’s not any cop, it’s the alpha cops with the genes and the bad boy tats combined with the authority and power over other men their job gives them that makes them especially attractive to a large number of women. Just my observations and from what I have heard from more than one woman express verbally. This makes sense in society where law and order is breaking down. Women will seek protection in the last place they DON’T get it (the streets) because the legal paperwork​ system doesn’t work on the streets, only the MEN who enforce that system on the streets. But they also have to have the genes of course.

  76. I guess it’s about individual choice in the final analysis. Internalized mindset.

    I don’t really need to ” theorize ” about the whole ” cops and legal system ” thing as I’ve had to strategize around it for most of my early life.

    Depends on where a man sets his threshold. So I want to go to prison? Fuck no. Will that fact mean that I will read and he intimidated by police and the legal system? Fuck no yet again. Basically, I’m a law abiding citizen. Some off duty cop flashing his gun is no different than a blood flashing his. The cop might as well be flashing his dick.

    Say it’s about being a Badass or whatever, but that misses the point totally. What is acceptable to you as a man? What are you willing to live with?

    In New Jersey a conceal carry is harder to get than FaceTime with Jesus. All of my firearms are registered and legal, I have zero criminal record, so from time to time I’ll carry it my spidey senses tell me to.

    After an attempted car jacking ( which common wisdom said to hand over your car without any resistance) I carried my firearm for a month or so. The second attempt went very, very differently. So cops ” catch ” me with a gun? I have a lawyer and I’ll take my chances. My ultimate goal is no bullet holes, but I’d rather die a horrible death that he intimidated or scared of anything, including cops and the legal system.

    But that’s my personal choice.

    As far as women go, it’s been my experience that they’ll pick a ” protector “, but cops don’t automatically have some kind of edge in that department. Yes, many women will utilize the legal system to control the men in their lives, but a majority will not ( physical abuse aside. The cops should come if you’re beating her to a pulp.).

    Why do you think cops hate domestic calls?😂

    I’ve had hundreds of encounters with law enforcement over my lifetime. Even up to last year. Only a handful have ever gone sideways with cops brandishing their firearms and giving me that legal command of ” I’ll blow your fucking head off!!! “.

    Still got my head, still haven’t seen the inside of a jail/prison. 57 years bullet free. Never had a wife or gf or any woman I know call the cops on me.

    Nah, it isn’t about badass. Guys that are afraid of the system and it’s enforcers say stuff like that all the time, and it’s redirection that misses the point. Like people complaining about bullying instead of stomping a mudhole in the bully.s

    The ultimate thing cops and the system can do to you are kill your ass, or lock you up. That’s it. We understand each other, the system and I. If a man can look at himself in the mirror every day being intimidated and fearful of what some other man could do to him, and he’s okay with feeling that way, God bless him.

    That’ll never be me.

    Shoot me, lock me up. I’ll feel better about it.😁

    ….. But don’t let me get the drop on your ass, because at the end of the day, you’re still just a dude with a gun and a badge.

  77. Short story.

    About 15 years ago we had a couple of those ” cop shoots unarmed man ” scenarios. Eventually it became open season on cops, and there were about5-6 shootings of cops. The police weren’t allowed to work without a partner.

    There was a palpable look of fear in a lot of their faces. Different when people are shooting at you for no reason, huh?

    The police dept self corrected. They never ” caught” any of the shooters. Message recieved..

    Women panties dry in presence of ” tatted Badass ” cops.

    End scene.

  78. Blaximus. I’m just giving you what I have heard straight from women’s mouths. They definitely do get wet in the presence of tatted bad boy cops the exact same as they get wet for bad boy thugs. There is no difference in a woman’s​ mind ultimately except for which bad boy they meet first and/or who they believe will ultimately hold the power socially. Your anecdote is irrelevant. As far as the “Chan” comment… everything is interconnected. It’s not all based on this vague “female imperative” driving everything behind relations between the sexes. That is just stupid. It’s the “male imperative” that is just as responsible for the current “female imperative”.

  79. Final thought.

    Mind listening to what ” women ” say.

    They put an awful lot of demonstrable bullshit out in the ether.

  80. Sorry. But not just what they say but how they act around them. And who they date/fuck and marry. You can trust when a woman says she likes a dominant man SHE ACTUALLY MEANS IT. lol

  81. Poptart

    You can trust when a woman says she likes a dominant man SHE ACTUALLY MEANS IT. lol

    Well i restate my questions…

    What’s your experience level with women,? How old are you? Have you had penetrative intercourse with a female human? without paying for it?

Speak your mind

%d bloggers like this: