Sexual Selection & Existential Fear

Way back in the early years of this blog I wrote a post flipping a common feminist trope on its head. In Women’s Physical Standards I laid out the case that it is women, not men, who hold the most stringent and static standards for ideal male beauty.

…from a purely physical perspective, it is women’s idealized masculine form that hasn’t changed in millennia. While there may have been a Rubenesque period when men loved the fatties of the 1600′s, no such era ever existed for women’s physical preferences. The classic broad chest, wide shoulders, six-pack abs and squared jaws of greco-roman athleticism are still the idealized male form that has graced EVERY romance novel cover in existence. I’m still waiting for someone to post me a link for a dating site that caters exclusively to women’s fetish of BBMs – Big Beautiful Men – average to good looking, fit, women specifically looking overweight men. Executive Introductions caters to women seeking affluent, influential men, but women just looking for overweight men, that site doesn’t exist.

I wrote this essay in a time well before apps like Tinder and Bumble became household names. Since then (September, 2011) the sexual marketplace has fundamentally shifted to exactly the state I saw it going to then, and all it took to prove it was a handful of fuckingdating’ apps to facilitate Hypergamy. In 8 years women have proven they are every bit as viscerally motivated by men’s physical appeal as I spelled out in this post. Back then I was run up the flagpole for suggesting women were the ones with “unrealistic beauty standards”, now it seem matter of fact.

Of course, the double standard has gotten much worse with respect to men having any sexual selection standards. In Maryland we have the instance of high school boys being pilloried on a global stage for daring to rate their female classmates’ looks on a 1 to 10 scale. Ironically, the the same teen girls who took such offense to this will think nothing of swiping left or right on a potentially lover on Tinder in just a few short years. In fact, they’ll think it’s normal for a woman to base her sexual selection on the physical, yet the same is sexual objectification for men to do the same. Certainly, men will never be allowed to voice their physical preferences without the fear of personal destruction in our Global Village.

About 5-6 months ago, Pat Campbell, my co-host on Red Pill 101, linked me to a pair of stories about how offensive some social justice warriors found it that young men were avoiding trans-gender ‘girls‘ as potential dates. The logic was that more evolved heterosexual young men should feel attraction towards a trans-gender, biological male, if he was presenting himself as a female. The natural sexual selection process for those young men, and by extension all men, was being circumvented by the social imperatives of others.

Pat also linked me to a story where a popular, heterosexual, high school quarterback accepted the Homecoming Dance proposal of another homosexual young man. As expected, the story was written as a heartwarming victory for modern progressivism and a young man “secure in his masculinity” praised as a hero for essentially accepting a social control over his sexual selection process. Naturally, the predictable hate to overcome would be from ‘less evolved’ guys alleging the quarterback was really gay.

This is the pre-written script we expect will follow (the clichéd triumph over homophobia), but the real story here is that a young man’s sexual selection process has been removed from his direct control. If the quarterback had refused the proposal the best he could hope for would be that no story would be written about it – but the more likely story would be him having to defend himself against his homophobia. In essence, the threat of a global online mob ruining his future makes accepting the proposal a necessity.

In 2019 men’s control over their sexual selectivity is something women don’t want to hear about. Part of ensuring that Hypergamy is the defining social dynamic today includes exercising as much control over men’s sexual selection process as possible. As fluid as men’s selection naturally is, it’s still out of women’s total control. The method to that control is social pressure. Women’s need to insure against their own Existential Fear of pairing with an unacceptable guy is so obsessive they will resort to social engineering.

Tinder and Bumble are social engineering programs as much as they are facilitators of women’s Hypergamy. Body Positivity / Fat Acceptance (exclusively for women) is equally a social conditioning effort. But for these and more the latent purpose is the same – convincing men to repress their evolved sexual selection proclivities in favor of accepting women’s selection process as the ‘correct’ one. The Cardinal Rule of Sexual Strategies states that for on sex’s strategy to succeed the other’s must be compromised or abandoned. In today’s feminine-primary social order, the Feminine Imperative wants nothing less than complete abandonment from men – and it will use every social and political means available to insure men do.

Men must be raised up and conditioned from the earliest age to accept women’s strategy and their role in it as the only acceptable one. Men’s selection of a mate must be made for him according to women’s standards. Many times I’m asked how to go about “vetting for a wife”. I’m asked what the criteria, what aspects, what traits should a woman possess to make her “marriage material”. From a Red Pill perspective a lot of what I lay out seems highly offensive to the sensibilities of men and women conditioned by the Feminine Imperative. But the qualities, and the reasons I define them being desirable, are nothing any man who is invested in his own sexual strategy wouldn’t find mundane.

It’s not difficult to figure out what attributes in women would make for a good pairing – what’s offensive is that a man would ever have the temerity to require a woman to possess them at all.

It’s offensive to feminized sensibilities for a man to speak aloud the things he wants from a woman. How dare he ever have the presence of mind to create a list of acceptable qualities for a potential long term mate. Who is he to make demands? Has he not learned that Hypergamy and women’s needs now define his existence?

I’ve written in the past about how women commodify their own sexuality. We’ve pandered to the security needs of women for so long they feel entitled to their being met. We’ve developed a social order that’s prime directive is to insure against women’s Existential Fear of ever having to worry about a bad Hypergamous decision. We ensure that they can voluntarily reproduce at will via sperm banks and frozen eggs. We demand that men find them arousing no matter what their physical condition and in spite of 100,000 years of evolved arousal cues. Gynocentrism demands men be nothing more than willing participants in women’s sexual / life strategies.

A day ago I posted this quote on Twitter:

Women only see men as breeding stock or draft animals.

Women and their ‘allies’ lost their collective minds. Follow that link, see for yourself. It’s a litany of middle school blathering and presumption about my motives for making public what most of these feminists confirmed. All the responses are the predictable boilerplate you’d expect from a generation of women used to parroting back what the Village has taught them to respond with for so long.

But what is my observation revealing here? Nothing that we don’t already know – women define the reproductive process in western culture. And again, most of these feminists proudly agree with the observation. They say, “Yeah, as it should be”, while their oblivious male ‘allies’ seek affirmation.

The boys at the Maryland high school got caught in the gynocratic gears. They weren’t properly conditioned to know their place. They did what most guys in high school do, they compare notes, they make comparisons, because they still believed they might be allowed to have a preference of who they want to date, bang, have for a girlfriend, have for a wife. How dare they!

When the Beta Bucks / provisioning side of the Hypergamous equation is more or less accommodated for by the social order the only thing left is Alpha Fucks. This is Hypergamy on a meta-scale. Why would any woman bother with the notion of Value Added to make herself more ‘marriageable’? Men aren’t allowed to have preferences. They should feel lucky that a woman would date them in the first place. Feminism has taught her that if she is to be the ideal Strong Independent Woman® she is “never to do anything for the express pleasure of a man.” And besides, the exciting guys, the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys who she does swipe right on; those guys don’t care about ‘value added’ – they care about fucking.

The New Polyandry I described is an extension of ensuring women’s Existential Fear is always compensated for on a societal level.

The goal of feminism is to remove all constraints on female sexuality while maximally restricting male sexuality.

Roissy

I’ve quoted this in other essays. Usually I’m asked why this would at all be feminists goal?

“You think feminism is all about controlling your dicks?”

In essence, yes, but really it’s about affording women unilateral control over their Existential Fear and absolving them of any consequences for the bad decisions made in controlling for it. In the last essay I stated that Abortion is Eugenics, but isn’t affording women total control of human reproduction eugenics? Isn’t socially engineering and conditioning men’s behavior to accept women’s sexual strategy as the “correct”, normal one eugenics as well?

I would say yes, except, the Sisterhood doesn’t have a ‘master race’ planned. There is no uniform conscious direction to this eugenics. It’s all driven by women natural, evolved mental firmware and impulses – all facilitated by the power afforded to them by men. We’ve unfettered Hypergamy. We’ve allowed women to do something unprecedented in human history, we’ve given women the reins of the direction of human reproduction.

And we’ve done this at the same time we’ve maximally restricted male sexuality. Dr. Jordan Peterson once predicted that in the future any expression of male sexuality will be illegal. I would amend that: any Beta male expression of sexuality will be deemed offensive or illegal.

Published by Rollo Tomassi

Author of The Rational Male and The Rational Male, Preventive Medicine

Leave a Reply

  Subscribe  
Notify of
Sentient
Guest
Sentient
Offline

Poptart

You can trust when a woman says she likes a dominant man SHE ACTUALLY MEANS IT. lol

Well i restate my questions…

What’s your experience level with women,? How old are you? Have you had penetrative intercourse with a female human? without paying for it?

foxguy
Guest
foxguy
Offline

@Poptarts , I wouldn’t necessarily despair at the situation or even get angry about it, as Blaximus story indicates, these cops are sitting ducks when things go south and someone acts offensively against them, yes the law is on their side but the law is reactive/defensive it only happens after the fact , and at the point it’s too late(for them). When one of these nothing to lose guys with a prepared plan takes them on, usually he takes 1 or 2. It all depends on your attitude towards these guys, if you show no respect towards them while not… Read more »

theasdgamer
Guest

Blaximus. I’m just giving you what I have heard straight from women’s mouths.

Women are typically clueless about what they actually want…they have ideas about alpha from their past, then an alpha comes along who is different from men in their past…and women lie a lot, too. Pay attention to what women do, not to what they say.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Poptarts
I’m just giving you what I have heard straight from women’s mouths

Lol! Never mind what they say, watch what they do.

It’s not all based on this vague “female imperative” driving everything behind relations between the sexes. That is just stupid. It’s the “male imperative” that is just as responsible for the current “female imperative”.

You’re new here? Suggest that you read some of the archives. Maybe start with “war brides” or “quality woman”.

Poptarts
Guest
Poptarts
Offline

Oh I don’t care if women want to go with jacked cops or thugs. I’m not in despair about anything. It’s just an observation. Women themselves feel like they are with a protector but that is kind of an illusion. These tough guys are often a target of other tough guys and women are more endanger from their own tough guy husband statistically. I’m just simply observing the female tendencies toward the dominant alphas as society becomes more 3rd world. Quite predictible but still interesting. I’m in no way invested in women one way or another. They are boring frankly… Read more »

Poptarts
Guest
Poptarts
Offline

I’m not new here. I have read this blog for years and used to comment under another name. Nothing new is being said for the most part. And my “notch count” has nothing to do with making observations. The past commenters were a little more sophisticated, no offense.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Poptarts
I’m in no way invested in women one way or another. They are boring frankly and outside of their looks don’t have that much to offer me

Hmm. Incel, or gay? Maybe just young?

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Poptarts
I’m not new here. I have read this blog for years and used to comment under another name. Nothing new is being said for the most part.

Comments tend to get repetitive, but Rollo’s essays continue to evolve.

The past commenters were a little more sophisticated, no offense.

Such as? Names?

scribblerg
Guest
scribblerg
Offline

@Centuries – Wow, do you actually use that bucket of mush sitting on top of your neck for something other than keeping your hat from flying away? Mating isn’t an instinctual fear for me, but it is an instinct. And it’s you who doesn’t understand “alpha”. The term alpha in science comes from observing pack behavior in animals, and social dominance hierarchies. This “competence hierarchy” stuff is gobbledygook that Voxday and Roosh made up in their feral minds. There is zero science related to their vaporous emissions on the subject. Hint: That’s why so many men get confused about alpha… Read more »

rugby11
Guest
rugby11
Offline
EhIntellect
Guest
EhIntellect
Offline

“Alpha is social dominance. Social dominance is used by women as “social proof” in their blah blah blah.” A little poem for ya: A little learning is a dangerous thing ; Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring : There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, And drinking largely sobers us again. Fired at first sight with what the Muse imparts, In fearless youth we tempt the heights of Arts ; While from the bounded level of our mind Short views we take, nor see the lengths behind, But, more advanced, behold with strange surprise New distant scenes of endless… Read more »

theasdgamer
Guest

Wow, do you actually use that bucket of mush sitting on top of your neck for something other than keeping your hat from flying away? Just for fun…I’m beating you…guess the contest… Whereas in her home neighborhood, she may be much less likely to do so. tl;dr ASD is a factor in mating–may vary between locations …women will be much less likely to dance with a married man if their friends will see them. And if dancing with an old man will cause their friends to give them grief, they will abstain. But they might still want to sneak out… Read more »

Fact
Guest
Fact
Offline

I get a kick out of keyboard alphas who think if a man could just learn to be alpha enough then he would have control in a culture of open hypergamy where women are not only incentivized but rewarded for slutty behavior.

Sentient
Guest
Sentient
Offline

control in a culture

You only need to control your immediate environment. Fact.

EhIntellect
Guest
EhIntellect
Offline

“You only need to control your immediate environment.”

Dilly-dilly!

Fact
Guest
Fact
Offline

“You only need to control your immediate environment.”

OK buddy keep telling yourself that.

Revolution is inevitable
Guest
Revolution is inevitable
Offline

Scribbler:

Good luck keeping this degenerate, terminal shitfest called America going. It’s not easy admitting you are a beta conned for 40 years to slave for a an empire headed for dissolution, while they reduce your kids to debt slavery and replace you with an endless horde of Mexicans, Chinese, and Indians.

Pathetic. Dick and Ass licking pathetic. Jew and Negro worshipping pathetic. Get the picture?

SJF
Guest
SJF
Offline

“OK buddy keep telling yourself that.

Hah. Bitter cynic working a Top Down approach to living life.

“You only need to control your immediate environment.”

That is a brilliant distillation. Bottoms up approach to Red Pill and Game. Your immediate environment also includes your brain and your heart/soul. These things you can control when you get mastery of them. No more five stages of grief going on, good grief, life can be so simple.

Hah, I hope Scribbs doesn’t see my comment in The Existential Fear-Men.

EhIntellect
Guest
EhIntellect
Offline

Fact: OK buddy keep telling yourself that.”

meet

Endloesung: “Pathetic. Dick and Ass licking pathetic. Jew and Negro worshipping pathetic. Get the picture?”

What’s got you goofballs under the weather? Too many bitter dregs? Kubler-Ross much?

Fact
Guest
Fact
Offline

Staredown.
comment image

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Revolution is inevitable
Good luck keeping this degenerate, terminal shitfest called America going.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0GFRc Fm-aY

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline
Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Gillette again…from Rollo’s Twatter feed.

https://twitter.com/GilletteVenus/status/1113891573538799617

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Online

” I get a kick out of keyboard alphas who think if a man could just learn to be alpha enough then he would have control in a culture of open hypergamy where women are not only incentivized but rewarded for slutty behavior.”

I get a kick out of weak men who take pride in their weakness.

I hope the women aren’t too hard on you. They should let up and give you a break so that you don’t have to simmer in the angry phase.

Funny guy….
comment image

kfg
Guest
kfg
Offline

“I get a kick out of weak men who take pride in their weakness.”

r selection morality.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Well, I get no kick from champagne…

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Online

Mere alcohol doesn’t thrill you at all?

theasdgamer
Guest

I get a kick out of the Medici series. I know how I would have handled the exile from Florence. The Medici lacked imagination. All that money and no imagination.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Offline

Flying at just the right height with some guy named Cole Palen is one of the great kicks of my life.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Offline

Found the plane:

http://www.skytamer.com/1.2/2004/4077.jpg

EhIntellect
Guest
EhIntellect
Offline

I say this in the greatest deference to the dudes that did it for keeps….but it was as still fun:

https://youtu.be/R-2puqqmycM

Delta dawgs, yo!

Centuries
Guest
Centuries
Offline

@scribblerg #272667 [@Centuries – Wow, do you actually use that bucket of mush sitting on top of your neck for something other than keeping your hat from flying away?] ah nice start off with Ad hominem …not a good look [And it’s you who doesn’t understand “alpha”. The term alpha in science comes from observing pack behavior in animals, and social dominance hierarchies. ....Hint: That’s why so many men get confused about alpha in the manosphere, cuz you are not using the concept properly…….Alpha is social dominance. Social dominance is used by women as “social proof” in their gender selection… Read more »

EhIntellect
Guest
EhIntellect
Offline

“When a middle-school teacher was called to her principal’s office in January over a seminude photo that a student had obtained, she was confident the picture could not be of her.”

Not sure why this is twitterable. Is Rollo knocking Christian women, this particular Christian woman, or Christians, women in general…..

“that a student had obtained”

Ok…..is Rollo implying…..uh…..that she’s….uh…..student….what the fuck is Rollo implying?

When was there an antisexuality demand for Christians by Christians for anyone of any faith?

EhIntellect
Guest
EhIntellect
Offline

@ Centuries

A logical approach with @ScribblerG doesn’t work……his grammar is all fucked up. You’re speaking a foreign tongue. But keep it up. We’re all in this together to pull great guys in hiding out of there stupidity.

In time @ScribblerG will decide to stop speaking in his own self-styled Esperanza.

@ScribblerG

Anytime you want to get with the game, we’re on your side.

You’re kinda socially isolated here aren’t you….huh, you slow-witted, non-compliant Sigma?

EhIntellect
Guest
EhIntellect
Offline

Esperonto ….haha…..anyhow.

EhIntellect
Guest
EhIntellect
Offline

“They found that both men and women associated doing something good for the environment with being “more feminine.” And when men’s gender identity was threatened, they tried to reassert their masculinity through environmentally damaging choices.”

From Forbes.

I’m happy they’re grasping at the thinnest straws. It’s a house of cards.

I’m at a pickup clubbish thing here. About 40/60 women/men.

Some sugars….some not.

It’s not all bad.

I might be overconfident as I’m tipsy.

rugby11
Guest
rugby11
Offline

Sex and Performance all in the editing

das monde
Guest
das monde
Offline

What to make of this review: https://quillette.com/2019/04/03/the-goodness-paradox-a-review/ “… The Goodness Paradox relates a tale fit to charm the gentle males and females that compose its readership: that natural selection over the last few hundred thousand years has produced a considerably less querulous and more docile, collaborative, and feminized species. Over the long evolutionary timescale, males with gentler proclivities have gained the reproductive edge over the boors and the hoodlums, and we today aren’t primarily the heir of the mass-raping Genghis-Khans of the world, but of the milder, more eager-to-please and team-spirited bonobo-like males delivered from the toxin of chimpanzoid masculinity.… Read more »

kfg
Guest
kfg
Offline

Genghis Khan was only hundreds of years ago, not some vast evolutionary time scale ago. The French war brides of German soldiers are within the timespan of living memory.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Offline

http://pin.primate.wisc.edu/factsheets/entry/bonobo/behav

“These groups are patrilineal . . .”

“Females obtain rank as they age and have offspring, especially males.”

“While males rarely share food, when subordinate females beg for food from dominant males, the likelihood that the male will share is greatly increased if they first copulate (Blount 1990).”

The deeper you dig, the less matriarchy you find.

theasdgamer
Guest

To future historians, it may seem strange that science in the early twenty-first century once again fell afoul of dogma.

A bit sophomoric.

“Science” is such a hodgepodge of stuff that the word “science” essentially has very little use other than rhetorical applications as demonstrated by the writer.

Science is primarily about funding, which is about getting one’s scientific narrative (i.e., “dogma”) approved. Science is about politics and publicity as well, in order to acquire funding. /irony off

If anything is learned in the whole mess, it is entirely accidental.

theasdgamer
Guest

I’m happy they’re grasping at the thinnest straws. It’s a house of cards.

They’re falling like dominos. Checkmate.

Sentient
Guest
Sentient
Offline

“This has been the lowest point of my life,” Ms. Miranda said, adding, “I’ve never felt so small, so defeated, and it wasn’t my fault.

Always NMF…

EhIntellect
Guest
EhIntellect
Offline

Science is an observation of nature, it is not nature.

“Science is about politics and publicity as well, in order to acquire funding. /irony off.”

Science helps building bridges, making medicines, and, uh, you know, like, uh…..stuff.

EhIntellect
Guest
EhIntellect
Offline

“likelihood that the male will share is greatly increased if they first copulate ”

Moral of the story: sex her before you feed her.

Food is a placeholder for sex as far as satisfying necessities. It’s a somewhat fixed pie.

having a bad day
Guest
having a bad day
Offline

@kfg

“While males rarely share food, when subordinate females beg for food from dominant males, the likelihood that the male will share is greatly increased if they first copulate (Blount 1990).”

it seems that even monkeys know that you shouldn’t pay for a dinner date before for sex…lol… but those ‘dominant males’ prolly took a boot camp or something to know that…lol…

good luck!

having a bad day
Guest
having a bad day
Offline

@Sentient

https://biglawbusiness.com/jones-day-accused-by-female-attorneys-of-sex-bias-unequal-pay

seems to have been scrubbed already…lol

good luck!

Sentient
Guest
Sentient
Offline

The complaint is interesting on societal levels as well…

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5793276-JonesDaycomplaint.html

Appears JD is actually – [whispers] running a business… GASP!!!

having a bad day
Guest
having a bad day
Offline

@Rollo i like almost everything about the new format except the ‘online’ popups… they’re kind of distracting… is there any way for individual commenters to turn them off so we don’t see them? otherwise, i think the new format has everything that i liked about the previous format that was lost… like comment reference numbers, so we can specifically reference those comments by link (which is actually better than the time stamp reference that was lost) and i especially like being able to see all the individual comment history made by each commenter… makes it easier to find Culum’s FRs…lol… Read more »

Sentient
Guest
Sentient
Offline

Wait what? Culum’s posted a FR???

having a bad day
Guest
having a bad day
Offline

@Sentient

Here you go HABD

https://www.law.com/americanlawyer/2019/04/03/associates-assail-fraternity-culture-at-jones-day-in-200m-sex-bias-suit/?slreturn=20190305105712

thanks… i just thought it was interesting that that page was no longer available…lol… what with all the interwebs censoring going on…

The complaint is interesting on societal levels as well…

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5793276-JonesDaycomplaint.html

Appears JD is actually – [whispers] running a business… GASP!!!

ya… can’t have THAT sh*t going on… folks might get the wrong idea about ‘proper’ priorities…lol

good luck!

EhIntellect
Guest
EhIntellect
Offline

“Miranda said, adding, “I’ve never felt so small, so defeated, and it wasn’t my fault.”

Asserting her Miranda rights. “I have the right to remain likewise empowered woman and subjugated victim. I have a right to an excuse. If I do not have an excuse one will be provided for me.”

having a bad day
Guest
having a bad day
Offline

@Sentient

The complaint is interesting on societal levels as well…

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5793276-JonesDaycomplaint.html

Appears JD is actually – [whispers] running a business… GASP!!!

i read some of that…lol… a can smell the wet panties from all those female associates through the computer screen…lol…

brogan really is looking at a massive group sh*t test after a guard dog situ run up…lol… that’s what happens when you fail to manage your harem properly…lol… it seems he didn’t ‘disarm the cockblock’…lol

good luck!

having a bad day
Guest
having a bad day
Offline

@Sentient

Wait what? Culum’s posted a FR???

not recently…lol…

THAT’s why that search function is cool… so i can find those FRs from sooooo long ago…lol… you know, when i want to reminisce about putting in all that effort to coach him…lol… whatever happened to that dude anyway?… i bet he finally settled down with ‘epiphany chick’…lol…

good luck!

theasdgamer
Guest

Science helps building bridges, making medicines, and, uh, you know, like, uh…..stuff

I always thought that civil engineers built bridges and chemical engineers made medicines, but what do I know.

If you’re curious about demarcation, read “Against Method” by Paul Feyerabend. Since I’ve actually published a paper on this topic (demarcation), you might want to be a little circumspect and ask questions rather than be a dick. But have it your own way.

EhIntellect
Guest
EhIntellect
Offline

“ask questions rather than be a dick.”

Aw, man….it’s Friday. Just foolin’ around.

EhIntellect
Guest
EhIntellect
Offline

“I’ve actually published a paper on this topic (demarcation), you might want to be a little circumspect ……”

Wow. Well, congratulations. That’ll get you laid in college.

disgruntledearthling
Guest
disgruntledearthling
Online

Appears JD is actually – [whispers] running a business… GASP!!!
ya… can’t have THAT sh*t going on… folks might get the wrong idea about ‘proper’ priorities…lol

Been reading Atlas Shrugged… strange how a lot of it maps onto current events

Yollo Comanche
Guest
Yollo Comanche
Offline

Here’s some good news to offset the bad.

If everyone is equal irrespective of what they do, eventually every stone will be turned.

It could be that the solution to all of this REALLY IS more “equality”.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

das monde
What to make of this review:

Should have been nominated for a Hugo or a Nebula award.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Offline

“Should have been nominated for a Hugo or a Nebula award.”

Needs more dinosaur porn.

SJF
Guest
SJF
Offline

@Disgruntled Earthling. Atlas Shrugged was a wake-up call from some of us in a time long ago. Stephen Moore, who Trump wants to put on the Fed had an essay back in 2009,. It is behind a paywall at the WSJ. If I recall correctly, Dagny Taggart was proto red pill and out for Alpha Seed. I think she was libertarian. Good luck wading through the Galt speech. Some people copied and pasted it elsewhere: Like here: https://mariotti.blogs.com/my_weblog/page/45/ Here is a cut and paste: OPINION: DE GUSTIBUS By STEPHEN MOORE JANUARY 9, 2009 ‘Atlas Shrugged’: From Fiction to Fact in… Read more »

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Now, I gotta go find out what the Belgian law codes means by “debauchery”.
Because that’s the crime committed by a Norwegian Sugar Baby site trying to expand onto the continent.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/05/sugar-daddy-website-owner-charged-debauchery-belgium-sigurd-vedal

Nice slogan: “Rich meets beautiful” – timeless, in fact.

rugby11
Guest
rugby11
Offline
das monde
Guest
das monde
Offline

@theasdgamer

Science is like a nice guy: it earnestly provides knowledge and fundamental technology to the civilization, without much of genuine appreciation. It is used callously, but is not venerated. When will it take Red Pills about actual gender relations, and its own status? :-]

Yollo Comanche
Guest
Yollo Comanche
Offline

@das monde

Science also invented birth control pills, so fuck you.

ollieoxenfree1
Guest

Looks as though the feminine imperative took a little knock recently.

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Online

Research.

You’re 20 years late to the party.

R. Kelly isn’t some innocent due being framed and railroaded. He should’ve been locked up 15+ years ago.

You don’t know the whole story? Seen the video tape?

Lol, this ain’t even the FI. Fuck that guy.

( not a pedophile supporter . go ahead and rebutt ….)

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Online
ollieoxenfree1
Guest

I’m not questioning R. Kelly’s innocence or guilt but a solicitor who thought he could bring allegations of sexual abuse on charges R. Kelly has already had been cleared of in a court of law. This brings to mind Harvey Weinstein and the charges he’s faced with. Despite being able to prove his innocence, he’ll still appear in court to defend himself. The judicial system has been overly willing to side with women in an attempt to show it’s taking action where before it appeared indifferent. Women have successfully abused this for temporary gain. Michael Avenatti is an enabler of… Read more »

Ihmc
Guest
Ihmc
Offline

If the quarterback had refused the proposal the best he could hope for would be that no story would be written about it – but the more likely story would be him having to defend himself against his homophobia. In essence, the threat of a global online mob ruining his future makes accepting the proposal a necessity. In 2019 men’s control over their sexual selectivity is something women don’t want to hear about. Good post, as always, but it is also an instance of beating already much beaten horses. What it teaches the reader? That as feminine societal control grows,… Read more »

Ihmc
Guest
Ihmc
Offline

@Lue-Yee Tsang

Anybody harassing you will tell you that you are harassing them, or you would be harassing them, if you as much as expect to play on a level field with them.
That’s a central feature of harassment, projection onto the target.

Ihmc
Guest
Ihmc
Offline

Women only see men as breeding stock or draft animals. That’s to understate it by quite a bit. Women see men as multiple-purpose appliances. When you read the “seeking for” section of their profiles, you are astonished by how many functions they want in the prospective device. They want it to be available to them forever, but at the same time if it wants to stay with them one second more than they have any use for it, it becomes “sticky” and a “stalker”. They want it to forget he had a family, and learn that his family — the… Read more »

Ihmc
Guest
Ihmc
Offline

@AD

Feminism is more spread the less the ills it points its finger to have factual existence (existence beyond being imagined out of psychological need, that is).

In other words:
the more resources the state takes from men and shifts to women, doing women’s natural job of resource-extraction from men (that is: the more statually privileged women are).

The more completely any anti-women discrimination is lifted from society and culture and the work market: absence of discrimination lets the skill differential between the sexes come into the fore, this fosters sex-based jealousy, which takes the shape of imagined received discrimination.

Ihmc
Guest
Ihmc
Offline

@The ASD Gamer Women “lie a lot too”? Lol. That sorta suggests there are times when they aren’t lying — to either their selves or their mate or their friends or family. Now, in an effort for fairness, let’s say this: each of the sexes is a powerful, trusty mirror of the opposite sex, in that it has come to be largely moulded by the opposite’s preferences over time. I am no unreserved backer of evolutionary theory but in most places it seems based. If women are the way they are mentally, it’s not too unlikely that is due to… Read more »

ollieoxenfree1
Guest

@Rollo

Is there any way of giving posters the ability to edit their posts once they’ve posted them?
This would improve things no end.

SJF
Guest
SJF
Offline

I’m totally fucking bored. I only get this way once a year.

You lurkers who don’t comment: start commenting.

Come on, step up to the plate.

David Eagen
Guest
David Eagen
Offline

Happy Birthday GODFATHER

May you enjoy this along with your Cupcake Shirt

https://amzn.to/2VyiiKw

I wish you many more 35th birthdays

wahoo Mcdaniels
Guest

@SJF Eagles “Learn To Be Still” It’s just another day in paradise As you stumble to your bed You’d give anything to silence Those voices ringing in your head You thought you could find happiness Just over that green hill You thought you would be satisfied But you never will- Learn to be still We are like sheep without a shepherd We don’t know how to be alone So we wander ’round this desert And wind up following the wrong gods home But the flock cries out for another And they keep answering that bell And one more starry-eyed messiah… Read more »

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Wahoo McBoomer

Eagles

Ozzy Ozbourne can’t go on tour because he fell down and couldn’t get up.
The Strolling Bones can’t go on tour because Mick Jagger had heart surgery.

The 70’s are over. Have been for some time. 60’s even more.
Just saying.

wahoo Mcdaniels
Guest

Anonymous bleeder LoL

Playdontpay
Guest
Playdontpay
Offline

Really struggle to read the comments on Rollos essays anymore.

Just seems to be the same few keyboard Alpha wannabes stroking their intellectual egos and flinging a load of shit around the enclosure like bored monkeys.

Pretty Fucking boring tbh.

scribblerg
Guest
scribblerg
Offline

@Eh – I come back here and literally have no idea what you are going on about. I want to talk about the nature of alpha and whether Rollo is correct in his assertion that mating strategy is an “existential fear”. You? What are you up to? As for my grammar, yes, I don’t proof these comments. I’m being conversational. I have had to produce 3 books of error free prose and can do so, it’s just boring. And I don’t give a shit about the grammar in these comments. Pretty sad what’s happened in the comment section here. I… Read more »

kfg
Guest
kfg
Offline

For the record: Vox Day is anti-socialist, has argued for pure democracy, argues that people who consider themselves neo-Nazis and white nationalists are firmly of the left and calls them “alt-retard,” because both socialism and white nationalism are retarded. He is a nationalist, not a “white” nationalist. As nation is defined by relationship and common culture, some nations are white, but most are not. There is such a thing as an English nation and a Czech nation, a Bantu nation and a Maasai nation, but no such thing as a “white” or “black” nation. On the other hand he has… Read more »

Sentient
Guest
Sentient
Offline

Change one of the 14 Words and it’s a pretty universal standard.

Sentient
Guest
Sentient
Offline

Spot the alpha…

“He died aged 51 from a heart attack on March 3 and Laleh and her daughter, from Richmond upon Thames, Surrey, wanted to pay their final respects.

Two years earlier after the Portugese banker had left her after 18 years of marriage for a younger woman she lashed out in anger on his Facebook page when she saw a photo of his new wife on their wedding day.

Laleh said she wrote two comments in Farsi where she described 42-year-old Tunisian born Samah al Hammadi as a ‘horse’ and called her ex an ‘idiot’.”

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6898721/amp/Woman-branded-horse-face-British-love-rival-says-glad-held-Dubai.html

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Playdontpay Really struggle to read the comments on Rollos essays anymore. Yeah, the comments here have ups and downs. I don’t know if you remember when the Canadian feminist “Tree” used to fill up walls of text, it was scroll-a-rama. Or Geisha Kate. Or InsanityBytes. Rollo doesn’t ban people casually, but he has done it to get the noise level back down. Also It helps when Rollo culls the bots. I’m not sure if there’s one in this current thread or not. I see in more than one androsphere blogs a tendency towards a handful of men, typically 3 to… Read more »

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Number of incels, both male and female, growing in Japan?

https://www.france24.com/en/20190408-virgin-territory-study-shows-sexual-inexperience-rising-japan

EhIntellect
Guest
EhIntellect
Offline

“As for my grammar, yes, I don’t proof these comments. I’m being conversational.”

Dude, your still not getting it.

Grammar > Logic > Rhetoric

rugby11
Guest
rugby11
Offline
Fred Flange, GBFC (Great Books For Cucks at the Library of Congress)
Guest
Fred Flange, GBFC (Great Books For Cucks at the Library of Congress)
Offline

@Anonymous Reed-man I was struck by this last sentence in the Japan incel article you cited: “And they pointed out that sexual inactivity could also be higher than their research suggests because they only examined whether respondents had any sexual history, not whether they were currently sexually active.” Which, if similar surveys done here in Gilead about the trim-deprived are any indicator, would suggest that the percentage of unlaid male-type creatures there, like we are seeing, is much much higher than prior reports have indicated. But it’s all good. Nothing to see here. Besides it’s men’s fault they aren’t secure… Read more »

kfg
Guest
kfg
Offline

Allison Mack has pleaded guilty to sex slave racketeering charges in the NXIVM/Keith Raniere case.

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Online
Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

@kfg

Huh. That could mean any of several things. Very interesting…

anon
Guest
anon
Offline

Huh. That could mean any of several things. Very interesting…

I want to see the prison reality show.

rugby11
Guest
rugby11
Offline

Interesting red pill drops

anythinggoes75
Guest
anythinggoes75
Offline

Great article.

I proofread the post as I read along. See below.

“Big Beautiful Men – average to good looking, fit, women specifically looking 𝘧𝘰𝘳 overweight men.”

“Ironically, [the the] 𝘵𝘩𝘦 same teen girls who took such offense to this will think nothing of swiping left or right”

“swiping left or right on a [potentially] 𝘱𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘭 lover on Tinder in just a few short years.”

“The Cardinal Rule of Sexual Strategies states that for [on] 𝘰𝘯𝘦 sex’s strategy to succeed the other’s must be compromised or abandoned.”

“It’s all driven by [women] 𝘸𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯’𝘴 natural, evolved mental firmware and impulses”

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Online

It’s a disorder. Like OCD.

😁

%d bloggers like this: