The Rational Process

 

One of the most vexing things a lot of Red Pill aware men encounter when they interact with women today is the expectation that women are coequally as rational agents as men. We were taught from the earliest ages by our blank-slate equalist teachers that boys and girls are all the same, having coequal potential for coequal successes in life (as they define them), then primarily focusing on the ‘correct’, female way of educating both sexes. This education isn’t limited to just the classroom; the Village uses many ways (media, pop culture, religion, etc.) to deliver what is fundamentally the same message – boys and girls, men and women, are essentially, effectively, the same with respect to their potentials. Now, that’s the message not the practice. Even when they are forced to recognize definitive differences they simply dismiss them by saying “We’re more alike than different” in the presumption that this should be enough to refocus and reinforce their blank-slate belief set.

So when men and women consider differences in gender, differences in double standards, inequalities in gender-specific issues and pretty much any empirical debate about these and other differences, men presume that the women they are ‘debating’ with are also looking for earnest, equitable answers beginning from the same coequal state of mutual interest. This is almost never the case.

The pretense that’s been embedded into men from the earliest years of their Blue Pill conditioning is since men and women are coequal agents they should both be interested in finding an objective truth together. But the frustration in this ‘debate’ comes from the simple fact that our differences are actually much more significant than the dismissals of equalists would want them to be. The roots of this deliberate misunderstanding are twofold: First, the innate solipsistic self-interest of women, and second, women’s predisposition to interpret information using the Emotional (versus Rational) interpretive processes.

When men and women debate intersexual issues of contention men opt for their innately preferred Rational interpretive process; we look for factual evidence to support a premise. Women opt for the Emotional process and then consider evidence. This difference in processing is where a lot of personal and ideological obstacles come into play between men and women. Our educational priorities of both men and women prioritizes the importance of emotion and its expression before a consideration of the Rational process. We teach boys/men to sublimate their natural proclivity towards reason by replacing it with the Emotional process. Thus, we’ve seen the push to encourage men to get in touch with their feelings or their feminine sides since the late 60s.

As I mentioned last week, women prioritize context (how a conversation makes them feel) in communication while men prioritize content (the information of the conversation); these differences are part of our biological/neurological evolved inheritances. This is where the misunderstanding starts between the sexes; however, calling this a ‘misunderstanding’ is a bit of a misnomer.

I’m sure a lot of readers think this is a longwinded way of saying women’s emotions blind them to the facts that men present to them when they debate. While this is true in a sense, this is shortsighted because, in the interests of simplifying things, most guys will just blow off the dynamics that build up this (often deliberate) miscommunication. Women don’t like the way a Rational-prioritized conversation makes them feel. Often the reality is unflattering to their solipsistically defined egos – but the communication feels wrong because women’s presumption is that men should just know to acknowledge their feelings in that debate (all communication really). On the female side the presumption is that men and women, being blank-slate equals, already know to prioritize the Emotional process, while on the male side men presume women will prioritize the Rational process because, again, we’re all the same, right?

This presuming that one sex sees the same way as the other is endemic in our time. I had a reader pose me with a similar example:

I had a conversation with my LTR at dinner tonight where I did a thought exercise with her. I asked her to imagine what it would be like if people visually saw different colors when they looked at various objects but had consistent names for those colors in their own minds. For example, person A sees what person B calls Blue, but it looks like what would be called green if person A could peer into person B’s mind. The point was we can’t know what colors actually look like from an individual subjective perspective. Although I tried several times to walk through this, she couldn’t comprehend what I was trying to explain. I then realized that this exercise involved imagining a first person conscious experience from multiple perspectives. This test could be a proxy test for (women’s) solipsism.

This thought experiment is a good way to illustrate solipsism in women, but it’s an even better example of the default presumptions men and women have of each other in other areas. As it stands today, in our feminine-primary social order, the Blue Pill conditions us to default to cognitive models that are defined by the female experience. Thus, whatever best satisfies a female-primary purpose is always considered the correct purpose. The way women think, the way women prioritize their Emotional interpretive process, is the right way for men to think – and the mutual presumption is that men already do (or should) think and process stimuli like women do. Anything else, anything that would recognize a difference in men from women, always feels wrong.

This default presumption of a female-correct way of interpreting and experiencing the world isn’t limited to our differences in communication. This misalignment of interpretive differences also extends to the false presumption that men and women approach the concept of love from a mutually understood perspective. Men love idealistically, women love opportunistically, yet men’s presumption is that both men and women approach love from the Disneyesque idealism they believe women are capable of. Men too believe that women see the same colors they do and have the same names for those colors. In this case those colors are the concepts and approaches women have towards love. I may write a new essay outlining this dynamic soon, but I’ve already written many prior posts on this experiential difference.

Rationalism vs. The Rational Process

As a result of pushing the Emotional process as the correct way of interpreting our world the Rational process necessarily gets demonized today. It feels wrong to a social order predicated on the Emotional process, so the truths that the Rational process reveals seem cruel, biased or vindictive when they refute the interpretations of the Emotional process. The importance of Emotion has been elevated above an interpretive process to where it’s now entered a metaphysical realm. This is where the Emotional process becomes Emotionalism. In the light of this, the Rational process is overshadowed and sublimated in importance. But the Rational process is what exposes emotionalism for what it is: Emotion is an evolved, biological interpretive process that serves our species well, but the feelings it generates are biological responses to environmental stimuli, not evidence of some higher consciousness or mythic existential importance that goes beyond anything in the physical realm.

The Rational process throws a cold bucket of truth on lofty emotionalism. As a result, and because emotionalism has been a basis of our social order for millennia now, the Rational process had to be debased in importance.

Trust in the LORD with all your heart and do not lean on your own understanding. – Proverbs 3:5

This scripture is an example of the conflict between emotionalism and the rationalism that popular social consciousness would like to apply to the Rational interpretive process. The Rational process is based in our collective and subjective intelligence. Healthy men and women both have the mental hardware to use the Rational process well, but where we differ is in our gendered mental firmware. When we collectively prefer one process to the other, this is where we decide which gender’s process will define our social order. In order for emotionalism to supersede rationality and ensure its preeminence appeals to the emotional above the rational have to be popularized.

If we could depend on an unbiased, unadulterated form of reason the Rational process would be a superior methodology. But as I stated before, rationalism is dependent on intelligence and that intelligence takes time. In some ways the Rational process is sensitive to both instinct and emotion, in other’s that reasoning is painfully, sometimes fatally slow. The world happens fast and vacillating in the reasoning process might easily kill an individual. Fortunately we have instinct and emotion to carry us through. The Rational process requires time because it requires learning, contemplation, theorizing and any number of high-order thinking processes to be effective. And even then, that effectiveness depends on reasoning’s accuracy. For the past three or four hundred years we’ve increasingly had the luxury to develop our Rational process, but for all the advancements it’s given us, when it comes to intersexual dynamics emotion is still the priority.

We have placed such importance on emotion at the expense of reason that we’ll risk personal safety in our ‘right’ to express it. No doubt most men are familiar with repressing their emotional responses, but it’s interesting to consider that even with this self-control and even with our innate predilection to process emotion differently than women, men are the ones accused of failing to be ‘in touch with their emotions’. On first glance Robert Greene’s quote here appears to be wisdom (I think it is) – self-control, mastery of one’s emotional state, is a virtue. Yet, in our emotional-primary social order we’ll hear women complain that men are less emotionally available. And this conflict illustrates again that whatever is expedient to the female imperative is what is to be considered ‘correct’ at that moment.

Empiric reason is the foundation of what humanity has made of itself. Setting aside emotionality and considering challenges in a Rational interpretive process is fundamental to understanding the emotional and instinctive process and their advantages and weaknesses. For the record it’s my belief that all of these interpretive processes in union are are necessary elements in the human experience, but my focus on these processes is to lay a foundation for a better understanding of them. It’s easy to get caught up in the demonization of the instinctual and the rational when the emotional is defining what’s bad or good for our collective experiences.

When I wrote Appeals to Reason I was exploring the futility of expecting women to transition into a logical reasoning of why she should logically be with a guy who was more than happy to embody all of the aspects she stated she wants in a man. The manosphere idiom is “no woman was ever reasoned or logicked into bed with a guy”, women don’t follow the Rational process when it comes to interrelating with men. It’s all Instinctual and Emotional, and usually in that order. A man might be able to use his rational facilities to better understand women’s evolved instinctual and emotional responses, and what prompts them, but reason itself isn’t the key to that interrelation.

Appealing to women’s logic and relying on deductive reasoning to sort it out is the calling card of a Beta mind. There is nothing more anti-seductive for women than appealing to her reason. Arousal, attraction, sexual tension, subcommunication of desire, all happen indirectly and below the social surface for women. It’s not that women are incapable of reasoning (hypergamy is one logical bitch) or are crippled by their emotion-based hindbrains, it’s that if you’re asking her how to be more attractive you don’t Get It. It’s in the doing, not the asking.

If you’ve stuck with me to the end of this series I want to say thanks. I really felt that these interpretive processing models needed to be fully outlined as what I’ll get into in the coming months will need this as a basis for it.

5 1 vote
Article Rating

Published by Rollo Tomassi

Author of The Rational Male and The Rational Male, Preventive Medicine

Speak your mind

710 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
theasdgamer
4 years ago

Blax, the Sinclair thing was an obvious ruse to point out what’s been going on for decades on MSM.

theasdgamer
4 years ago

The document states that the CIA task force “now has relationships with reporters from every major wire service, newspaper, news weekly, and television network in the nation,” and that “this has helped us turn some ‘intelligence failure’ stories into ‘intelligence success” stories,’ and has contributed to the accuracy of countless others.” Furthermore, it explains how the agency has “persuaded reporters to postpone, change, hold, or even scrap stories that could have adversely affected national security interests or jeopardized sources and methods.” This is from years ago and still continues to this day. https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC_0005524009.pdf I’m sure that the CIA has made… Read more »

theasdgamer
4 years ago

Back in the day, I noticed that whether I watched NBC, CBS, or ABC, I got the same stories, the same issues, the same message, the same agenda, and, sometimes, the same words.

Gutfeld has a funny take on the Sinclair scripted message.

http://www.foxnews.com/transcript/2018/04/02/gutfeld-on-infamous-sinclair-mission-statement.html

marelius
marelius
4 years ago

Opinions will differ, though, and life goes on. Now back to gaming.

+1

If you all keep this up, ALL credibility will be out the window. There are already many, many other sources of [fake] news in the blogosphere. Do we really need to turn this bog into yet another one?!?! Stick to the plan, men – RP triage and advice.

marelius
marelius
4 years ago

LOL – Bog is currently a more accurate description than blog. Lets change that back.

Blaximus
Blaximus
4 years ago

” I had no idea who the hell Sinclair is…but NBC, CBS, ABC…PBS…I know who they are.”

And yet, you made an incorrect assumption anyway.

Hmmmm……

married_mgtow
married_mgtow
4 years ago

So on that note I was just listening to the MSM, man it is getting more painful daily after being red pill for a few months….. So MSM, should I specify which one….haha, had a interview of sorts on the groupie girl that is suing R Kelly or such. So in the story apparently after getting noticed at a concert, she starts exchanging texts and such, then he flies her out to a concert and sets her up in a hotel, and of course bangs her. So my question, was this a big beta move on R Kelly’s part to… Read more »

theasdgamer
4 years ago

lol @ Blax

O.B.I.T.
O.B.I.T.
4 years ago

Do upper middle class guys ever have that Road to Damascus RP moment?

One emphatic proof the answer is “No” was that notorious op-ed in the Wash Post where the guy claims to be just fine with his wife’s demand for an open marriage, even though he knows she’s going to be getting 99 percent of the outside action. That set a new standard for self-abasement in print,

Blaximus
Blaximus
4 years ago

R. Kelly is a sexual predator with a taste towards very young girls. He’s been this way forever and it’s been well known since the infamous ” sex tape ” with the underage girl ( there have been numerous sex ” tapes ” since then, but I’m only concerned with the underage one as that is a real problem for me ). Granted, he is taking advantage of his ( fading ) stardom to satisfy his oddball proclivities. He’s got some real issues and little Game if his published interactions are real. He whines and threatens and begs and, most… Read more »

Blaximus
Blaximus
4 years ago

Clue number 1 from the 90’s –

Kelly married Aaliyah when she was 15. The marriage license stated she was 18, and the marriage was annulled.

comment image

Blaximus
Blaximus
4 years ago

Younger, hotter, tighter… indeed.

Blaximus
Blaximus
4 years ago

… plus, I never cared for his ultra shitty music either. Lol.

EhIntellect
EhIntellect
4 years ago
Anonymous Reade
Anonymous Reade
4 years ago

married mgtow
So my question, was this a big beta move on R Kelly’s part to fly her out and set her up in her own hotel room

Provider game is generally Beta to some degree, or at least betaizing. Ask Elon Musk…

Anonymous Reader
Anonymous Reader
4 years ago

What’s that look R. Kelly is sporting in the first TMZ video, is it “Zombie Firefighter” or something else?

theasdgamer
4 years ago

Blax, I think that your shiv of Kelly could be shiv of the week over at Heartiste.

Blaximus
Blaximus
4 years ago

Different motivation asd.

I really don’t like dudes that like having sex with girls below the age of consent, whatever that means. The guys that are threateningly manipulative make me want to do very, very painful and bad things to them.

Comes from having sisters and daughters and stepdaughters.

There are more than enough 18-20 somethings out in the world. And no matter what one’s sexual urges entail, there are more women willing to satisfy them than a man can count, and they are all out of highschool.

comment image

Just one more reason we need a return of masculinity.

O.B.I.T.
O.B.I.T.
4 years ago

Plus why is he wearing my old mini-dachsund’s fluffy white blankie?

Blaximus
Blaximus
4 years ago
Blaximus
Blaximus
4 years ago

Last from me on the subject.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjsufO9hZwo&w=1280&h=720%5D

If y’all hear R. Kelly was attacked and severely beaten in New Jersey, send me bail money.

j
j
4 years ago

Good video

married_mgtow
married_mgtow
4 years ago

Blax, I’m sure we could put together a Blax Bail Bond if necessary.

married_mgtow
married_mgtow
4 years ago

ASD and Blax
“Blax, I think that your shiv of Kelly could be shiv of the week over at Heartiste.”

If you mean the Beta of the year/week post, there is apparently already an entry for some guy called Prince Harry, might be a tough week to compete…..

ЕsСherCixWyеn
ЕsСherCixWyеn
4 years ago

https://youtu.be/xZYjIfKyinU A male news reporter gets insulted by a female news reporter, when the winner is a female, its called “an epic way to insult”, If a man was in the same position? Needs no further telling… One thing I ve learned from the US men new generation even the old generation (Blax, Eh, asd generation) that they have already reached a point that they even ridicule themselves. When people sees a tough man roasting a girl with words, either he gets labelled as “Gay” or misogynistic… Guys seem to avoid fight more than ever. They don’t want any real… Read more »

Blaximus
Blaximus
4 years ago

@ j You’re right, that was a good video. I’ve been trying to wrap muh head around this whole ” incel ” thing for a few years now. I find it hard to grasp though, unless these cats are too mentally deficient or something. But as I’d witnessed in highschool, chicks will fuck anybody under the right circumstances. No, the incel can’t have the cheerleaders because they belong to me, lol, but there are countless 4’s and 5’s that may be 20 or 100 pounds overweight that are longing for some penis. The guy in the video is absolutely right… Read more »

ЕsСherCixWyеn
ЕsСherCixWyеn
4 years ago

j “The Truth about incels” They are Incels for the social construct. Their instincts are not like “incels”, when people couldn’t make it a way to develop their inner masculinity, who are you to mock at them? Gamers are people without respect, their behaviours are not from their heart, that’s why they call it “Game”. I saw one commenting on Field Report “I gamed her first two months… After month count 6, I lost my frame completely!” Gosh! You’re what you say, what you do. Why it would be a game? TextGame, nightgame, daygame … The way you guys comment… Read more »

Blaximus
Blaximus
4 years ago

Es Cher

comment image

I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

ЕsСherCixWyеn
ЕsСherCixWyеn
4 years ago

Off topic Blax

EhIntellect
EhIntellect
4 years ago

Sell! Sell! Sell!

That cracking you just heard is the sound of the glass ceiling breaking at the New York Stock Exchange as a woman became president of the financial market for the first time in its 226-year history.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/markets/2018/05/22/stacey-cunningham-first-woman-lead-nyse/631886002/

j
j
4 years ago

The “countless 4s and 5s” don’t want to fuck the incels (see the part at 2:36. even ugly and obese women are turned off by this dude lmao) they want the men in the 7/8 range because that’s what they (wrongfully) feel they “deserve” because of social media https://twitter.com/thefaceberg/status/964878839267573761 “Pretty much any high status guy (athletes, entertainers, etc) is shooting fish in a barrel with these instagram women right now. I’ve even seen them stoop to ones who are 4’s without makeup. These women are ruined for life after one encounter like that. They will never be capable of respecting… Read more »

Anonymous Reader
Anonymous Reader
4 years ago

Blaximus
I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

Looks like another version of the same old ‘bot…just saying.

ЕsСherCixWyеn
ЕsСherCixWyеn
4 years ago

AR
Shut up

ЕsСherCixWyеn
ЕsСherCixWyеn
4 years ago

j

Hats off you. You got all the knowledge I was looking for

ЕsСherCixWyеn
ЕsСherCixWyеn
4 years ago

Blax R. Kelly is a sexual predator with a taste towards very young girls. He’s been this way forever and it’s been well known since the infamous ” sex tape ” with the underage girl ( there have been numerous sex ” tapes ” since then, but I’m only concerned with the underage one as that is a real problem for me ). Granted, he is taking advantage of his ( fading ) stardom to satisfy his oddball proclivities. He’s got some real issues and little Game if his published interactions are real. He whines and threatens and begs and,… Read more »

ЕsСherCixWyеn
ЕsСherCixWyеn
4 years ago

Blax

Some underage girls experiment sex with of their same age boys (one I saw in my eyes) , surely not every girl . That girl played in the field with boys, sexy and obviously more sexually receptive than other girls. That time I caught her having experiment with, she was 7. Now she is 15, gave me strong indication for sex last year, But I avoided her cause she was a slut.

EhIntellect
EhIntellect
4 years ago

Well guys, time to close up shop. Salon states the SMV chart’s a fraud. They buy Mike Cernovich’s book “Gorilla Mindset,” which mixes self-help idioms with tips on better posture and observations that “while American women suck in general, there are plenty of guys pulling hot ass.” Rollo Tomassi, who gives lectures with charts and graphs of dubious construction and origin, advises men to beware the possibility that their female partners, when ovulating, will go out with their friends for drinks in order to find secret breeding opportunities with other men. At least that’s what “studies” say. Those who buy… Read more »

Lost Patrol
Lost Patrol
4 years ago

Well guys, time to close up shop. Salon states the SMV chart’s a fraud.

Time to go to plan B then (sorry, not sold in stores):

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_q9EUpuALkCQ/TKfOcBW7tEI/AAAAAAAAMZI/yFB8PeD03uU/s1600/2010_10_02_17_25_51.jpg

Sentient
Sentient
4 years ago

J WIA’s take: Game vs Sales – A guy that is good at all kinds of sales, getting strangers to buy things that they don’t need – should be good at pulling chicks. What I know about sales, having done sales, and having met a # of sales people – they don’t tend to be the same sort of guys that really understand women, women’s behavior, and the seduction process. http://www.westindianarchie.com/may-19th/ Also – marketing is not sales… “marketing” in PUA = opens, opens, opens, attraction, attraction, attraction… It does not mean sales, i.e. “selling” i.e. “closing” i.e. “signing on the… Read more »

Lost Patrol
Lost Patrol
4 years ago

Damn HTML text formatting. I did it right, I promise. The hatch just blew.

theasdgamer
4 years ago

Feminists are whistling in the dark. The secret’s out about women. They aren’t men. lol

EhIntellect
EhIntellect
4 years ago

Nice comment j. “once she fucks him, that’s her new value. In her mind she’s a girl who deserves nothing less” How Alpha Widows are made. Be the widowmaker. It’s not difficult if you’re sexually aggressive and early on the scene in her 20’s, though it could happen anywhere along her lifespan, I imagine. “Marketing = game.” Anything said beyond visual personal information exposes insecurity, technically. Hence, naturals pull more with less. Women sense insecurity with ease and blank that. False confidence vs. confidence deceives their hindbrain and they’ll test that for validity. Better to psychopath fake it, lie, whatever… Read more »

EhIntellect
EhIntellect
4 years ago

@ Sentient

How would you direct open the bar side trio above?

Me? Foot tapping her: “Your Jimmy Choo’s are decent knockoffs. I can tell. They’ll do for tonight.”

Sentient
Sentient
4 years ago

The name associated with the Slate article above

Jared Yates Sexton is an American author and political commentator from Linton, Indiana. He is an associate professor in the Department of Writing and Linguistics at Georgia Southern University.

https://twitter.com/JYSexton/status/998969341453520898

Coming to get ya Rollo…

Blaximus
Blaximus
4 years ago

Eh The salon writer is making the routine mistake of mashing things together that really don’t have anything to do with each other at all. Par. Two weekends ago when addressing about 1,500 youths in nyc, I put Richard Spencer’s picture up on a 20 foot screen, followed by a kind of ” best of ” video that ran about 10 minutes. Not one person in the auditorium had ever even heard of Spencer before. I’m out to educate and inform.😁 And I expect these ( mostly young men ) to go and get more engaged. But the lumping of… Read more »

Sentient
Sentient
4 years ago

Blax

But the lumping of rollo with the alt right, Peterson, cernovitch or anyone else is infuriating, because these writers make a half assed judgement without understanding the material(s).

Your quaint Reactionary Progressivism is showing… be clear – THERE IS NO MISUNDERSTANDING by Sexton. His actions are fully informed and deliberate. He is an Equalist of the first order. He aims to literally destroy the very ground even you stand on.

Sentient
Sentient
4 years ago

Eh I’d not look at them while striding to the empty stool to the left, place my hands flat on the bar, spread wider than shoulder with, summon the bartender, order – resolutely ignoring them, get my drink, thank the bar tender, take a sip… and wait… Force the open. when one did, and they will, quarter turn my head over the shoulder, looking her up and down quickly, and say something like “ohhhh” while turning back to face the bar. Then when they open again, turn round to lock in back to bar and address the quiet one…. “so… Read more »

Blaximus
Blaximus
4 years ago

Sentient

I invite him or anyone to destroy the ground I stand on. Love a good fight, believe in choking motherfuckers out when applicable.😁

But seriously, if men can’t figure out how to pushback against being told that they are something they aren’t, then they will deserve the inevitable ass fuxking to come.

Sentient
Sentient
4 years ago

comment image

EhIntellect
EhIntellect
4 years ago

Sexton vainly assumes peer reviewed academic science outstrips boots on the ground heuristics.

Lumping all these dark web (that’s telling and desperate psyops attempt) guys together is telling. Sexton and HIS ilk have no fucking clue what’s going on beyond what they read and accept must be true. He cites Rollo (congrats, your infamy proceeds you now) but refuses to look beyond his BP cocoon. This guy was pants on the playground and is write for revenge.

He’s not living THAT well writing nor banging hotties and such he’s the frustrated one.

Sentient
Sentient
4 years ago

well this guy is all about guys ass fucking… but I suspect more a bottom…

theasdgamer
4 years ago

Lumping only makes sense if you have someone with the power to enforce discipline, which the Left does admirably. For example, when there is a protest for “choice,” you’ll see eco-wackos, union members, feminists, LGBTPDQRSVXYZ, community organizers, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, democratic politicians, etc. all show up to support the rally.

By way of contrast, if anyone on the right organizes a demonstration, all the other members of the right will form a firing squad to take them out.

Sentient
Sentient
4 years ago

Eh

They want you indoctrinated in their truth.

https://twitter.com/JYSexton/status/991713176566796288

Sentient
Sentient
4 years ago
theasdgamer
4 years ago

Progressives seek progress…kind of like lemming migrations…leading to mass suicide and the death of civilization.

theasdgamer
4 years ago

Sexton excels at intellectual masturbation.

Sentient
Sentient
4 years ago

Blax

“I invite him or anyone to destroy the ground I stand on.”

Oh you don’t need to issue an invitation, the battles been joined for decades now. They need to get through us cis/het white guys first… then they’ll get around to the cis/het black guys.

Blaximus
Blaximus
4 years ago

Sentient

Bro, you got it reversed. They’ve already ravished much of us for a good 25 years now. Hell, even longer. How it’s just irrelevance and zombification.

I’m watching as ” they ” turn their sights on white males with an even more ” in your face ” agenda. They don’t even have the courtesy of utilizing subterfuge.

But hey, at least we have a plethora of gay television shows out of the deal. Matriarchy. It’s what’s ( scheduled ) for breakfast. And lunch. And dinner. And even a light snack.

Blaximus
Blaximus
4 years ago

The way I see it, the pattern goes something like this – 1) a ” group ” is identified. Identification is ” harmless ” and is only a means of pointing out obvious differences. 2) Every member of a group will be assigned commonalities that apply to each and every individual. In effect, there won’t be any recognition of individuals, only the group one belongs to. 3) the group accepts these obvious assignments and many will act accordingly. 4) The behaviors of the group are seen as a toxic problem due to the actions of some members of the group.… Read more »

theasdgamer
4 years ago

When tribes unite into a nation, or single-issue groups merge into a coalition, they can defeat rival tribes and single-issue groups.

Conversely, when individuals try to triangulate between single-issues or tribes, they get hammered.

The military principle is “defeat in detail.”

theasdgamer
4 years ago

Blax, that’s called “tarring with a broad brush”.

Blaximus
Blaximus
4 years ago

Yup. And it’s pervasive and effective.

fleezer
fleezer
4 years ago

“How would you direct open the bar side trio above?” me: “it’s my distinct pleasure to inform you three ladies of your (pause, hmmm) first place ribbon tonight” (judging them like 4H pigs) them: blah… (who cares. they ain’t going anywhere seated like that so i continue dancing) me: “as this evenings queens of inappropriate footwear you’re entitled to (drumroll – make them all do the drumroll)…. absolutely nothing. you can pick up your blue ribbons by the grease dumpster in the back alley later tonight” them: blah blah whatever hopefully mad faux indignation if i’m on it me: “seriously… Read more »

theasdgamer
4 years ago

fleeze, illustrating overt use of Preselection

fleezer
fleezer
4 years ago

“How would you direct open the bar side trio above?”

to the one on the left:

me: “they call it stemware, and add an actual physical stem for you to hold, so that your chilled wine doesn’t heat up in your sweaty hand. i bet you never had vintage krug, so let’s start with what you have had”

her: (if she even hints at qualifying to me i immediately turn my back to her partially and engage the other two)

j
j
4 years ago

@fleezer

posting an actual FR > fantasying about how you think things would play out IRL

theasdgamer
4 years ago

“How would you direct open the bar side trio above?” Hold out my left hand to the ugliest one and face the dance floor. If there’s no dance floor, address the ugliest one, “I don’t get it. I just don’t get it. What’s an awesome girl like you doing here without a man?” [Implicit neg on the other two because 1) you ignored them, 2) you didn’t call them “awesome”, and 3) they don’t have men either] When you express a sense of confusion and frustration, you’ll generate trust and a desire to help in other people and a sense… Read more »

EhIntellect
EhIntellect
4 years ago

This is a general comment and there are many example otherwise but in the main I believe this to be true. TPTB have destroyed the black culture in many respects except one…normalizing homosexuality. For some non-conformist reason blacks as a culture aren’t too keen on celebrating homosexuality as just another lifestyle within their own families. Whites have succumbed in most part beyond tolerance to acceptance to celebration of homosexuality as life +1. Perhaps the religiousness plus persistent external existential threat plus black identity keeps the gayification of the black culture at bay. TPTB are insular, incestuous. They’re running out of… Read more »

theasdgamer
4 years ago

To illustrate my point about how expressing confusion and frustration generates trust and a desire to help, consider Rush Limbaugh v. Sean Hannity. Both are right wing, yet Limbaugh is more likeable and easier to listen to than is Hannity, because Hannity comes off as arrogant, but Rush comes off as confused and frustrated by the left. So listeners are more apt to sympathize and attempt to connect to Limbaugh than they are to Hannity.

Blaximus
Blaximus
4 years ago

Eh

Old school preachers are still occasionally getting bashed in the msm for their positions on homosexuality, and once the old fellers are all dead and gone, there will be no voices left in opposition.

Cable channels are riddled with portrayals of gay black men and women. It’s constant. There’s hardly any will to push back or protest these things anymore. Old guys like me are fatigued already, and young guys just boil in silence under the surface.

Give it one more generation and full capitulation will be accomplished..

rugby11
rugby11
4 years ago

http://thebaumlist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/john-slattery-roger-steling-Mad_Men.jpg
Motivation on Journey
comment image
Fighting a losing Battle 8
Alexis Lekat
comment image

EhIntellect
EhIntellect
4 years ago

“young guys just boil in silence”

Until they’ve had enough and the shit hits the fan. You addressed kids recently. I’ve always hope it’ll come around as RP is understandable to young boys and BP is a dream killer. Blacks don’t accept their dreams strangled in the crib. They KNOW their getting screwed, but as the Native Americans, trust the homegrown devil they know than the one they don’t.

EhIntellect
EhIntellect
4 years ago

“There’s hardly any will to push back or protest these things anymore.”

Of course cable won’t recognize antiBP sentiment until it becomes a Peterson level force.

No to-be parent ever says, “I hope my child will be a flamboyant gay man.”

Anonymous Reader
Anonymous Reader
4 years ago

Jared Yates Sexton is an American author and political commentator
in Slate.

Going by the slimy tweets posted above, Jared is not just blue pill, not just a Manboobs level mangina but downright paranoid. Those tweets about how “education” is under attack or siege are risible.

A few years back the SPLC briefly discovered the manosphere and declared it anethema, but it did not stick partly because they got out their usual one-house-wide brush to paint with. This is a bit different.

Clearly we have moved from the “point and laugh” stage to the “attack” stage.

Anonymous Reader
Anonymous Reader
4 years ago

EhIntellect
No to-be parent ever says, “I hope my child will be a flamboyant gay man.”

You’re showing your age. There aren’t many people like that, but they exist.

Anonymous Reader
Anonymous Reader
4 years ago

Nobody here has ever known a man who pushes his daughter(s) to be “better than the boys” at everything? Never run into the “soccer daddy” who is all about his 10 year old being “better than the boys”, and so forth?

Some of the biggest feminists I have ever met were married men with no sons, just daughters. Blue pill to the max, henpecked by their wives, and woe to any male human that dares criticize the girls.

rugby11
rugby11
4 years ago

AR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqU7D_ONJQs
Free flow of ideals

Anonymous Reader
Anonymous Reader
4 years ago

ЕsСherCixWyеn
AR
Shut up

Truth hurts the ‘bot.

ЕsСherCixWyеn
ЕsСherCixWyеn
4 years ago

AR
Shut up

ЕsСherCixWyеn
ЕsСherCixWyеn
4 years ago

Just talked to a woman online. Lives in Michigan. Her husband got small dick. She is depressed and looking for a big one white or black. Gosh! If I just could reach the husband. She had 3 miscarriages, I bet this time shes gonna cheat on the husband and get preg with another dude within a month.

ЕsСherCixWyеn
ЕsСherCixWyеn
4 years ago

@all
Why I’m being horrifyingly avoided?

Anonymous Reader
Anonymous Reader
4 years ago

Truth hurts the inferior ‘bot.

Anonymous Reader
Anonymous Reader
4 years ago

Plus, ‘bots are boring. More boring than watching paint dry.

ЕsСherCixWyеn
ЕsСherCixWyеn
4 years ago

Thats why you don’t give yourself a username

theasdgamer
4 years ago

I googled “pinker main sex differences in cognitive abilities”. Lots of hits supporting the notion that there is no gender difference in cognitive abilities. You know, it’s really amazing to me that some men are so invested in the notion of gender equality that they mount defenses against the well-documented science that men’s and women’s brains are very different, especially in circuitry (men’s brains connect circuits front to back and women’s brains connect circuits side to side) and that the IQ distribution difference between men and women explains why there are so many more men in science than women. That… Read more »

Blaximus
Blaximus
4 years ago

http://mandalaprojects.com/ice/ice-cases/images/KHMeltingIceandPermafrost.jpg

All I know is that Jersey had 3 ” 100 year hurricanes ” in 3 years. Something is broken.

Blaximus
Blaximus
4 years ago

comment image

SJF
SJF
4 years ago

So what you are saying Blax, is that the House and the Senate should take control of the climate.

Good luck with that.

As a climate follower, in a wildlife habitat farming venue, I have to say: roll with the punches tends to be the prevailing climate. It is different every year. With a vengeance at times.

With Life is Beautiful at all points on the Spectrum.

But that how I roll. You Mileage May Vary.

theasdgamer
4 years ago

Blax, lol, just stop the bullshit… class projects…seriously? climate change wackos took $2000000 in “green” money, on average in the House climate change non-wackos took $1000 in “green” money, on average, in the House (Sorry, I don’t have fancy art programs to make it pretty.) I might be off by a place or two in my figures. About the hockey stick controversy: Now comes the real shocker. This improper normalization procedure tends to emphasize any data that do have the hockey stick shape, and to suppress all data that do not. To demonstrate this effect, McIntyre and McKitrick created some… Read more »

theasdgamer
4 years ago

Perhaps the most obvious…is the highly disturbing series of emails which show how Dr Jones and his colleagues have for years been discussing the devious tactics whereby they could avoid releasing their data to outsiders under freedom of information laws. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/6679082/Climate-change-this-is-the-worst-scientific-scandal-of-our-generation.html Who are Jones and his colleagues? The reason why even the Guardian’s George Monbiot has expressed total shock and dismay at the picture revealed by the documents is that their authors are not just any old bunch of academics. Their importance cannot be overestimated, What we are looking at here is the small group of scientists who have for… Read more »

boulderhead
4 years ago

They will have to change the name annual hurricane,till it becomes monthly.

theasdgamer
4 years ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_New_Jersey_hurricanes

Must have been awful to lose millions of homes. lol

SJF
SJF
4 years ago

Fucking 19 y.o. names:

ЕsСherCixWyеn

WTF?

IAS
IAS
4 years ago

@ASD, Blax, SJF: I think denying climate change based on political views is a bit strange. The observations are there. What is arguable is what is giving rise to the changes and whether something can be done about it. Personally, even if the changes are man-made, I’ve given up on expecting it to be reversed. We are almost certainly past the point of no return. Even if the U.S. played ball, China wouldn’t. Tragedy of the Commons. I don’t have kids (and don’t want to), so I have little skin in the game. I think I’ll have most of my… Read more »

theasdgamer
4 years ago

IAS, we see what we expect to see. My point was that climate change is being used to advance socialist agendas and grab political power. Therefore, it necessarily will be viewed thru political glasses and people will lie, cheat, and steal to grab power and money. Climate change alarmists were saying that Manhattan would be under water by 2018. That has not happened and is not likely to happen any time soon. There has been some dwindling of arctic ice. However, there has also been some increase in Antarctic ice. So, that seems just to be due to wind shifts,… Read more »

theasdgamer
4 years ago

IAS, the eco-alarmists were saying that we would run out of oil by 1973 and food by 2000 or thereabouts because of overpopulation. Obviously, that hasn’t happened. Eco-alarmists were saying that all life in the Pacific Ocean is gone and that the Pacific Ocean is dead. lol They were saying that the earth was cooling and other stupid alarmist shit. They ignore massive natural sources of pollution like volcanos, wildfires, flooding, and undersea vents. They said that Lake Erie would never recover because it was so polluted, but it has recovered nicely. So color me skeptical about eco-alarmist claims. They… Read more »

Blaximus
Blaximus
4 years ago

IAS

You get the point. Something is going on and we are beginning to see and feel the effects.

It’s crazy to conflate weather with politics as the only obvious relationship between the two is money and/or ignorance.

Lol, everything in life isn’t some kind of leftist conspiracy. Hurricanes and oceans are non political and give no fucks.

theasdgamer
4 years ago

how do you display gifs? I forgot.

710
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
%d bloggers like this: