Arm Candy

BwYNPZOCEAEgFzo

In Monday’s post comments there was a lot of back and forth, but in the latter pages there was an interesting exchange I thought might make for an interesting weekend discussion. Commenter Kryptokate resurrected an old feminine social convention I recently covered in Validation Hunting & The Jenny Bahn Epiphany. The premise of this convention is that men seek out, and motivate themselves towards highly attractive women because they enjoy the validation or affirmation they receive from their male peers when they’re seen paired with an HB9 high SMV woman on his arm.

The “arm candy” trope is a useful convention for women in that it assuages her bruised ego and competition anxiety by converting a man’s natural desire for a high SMV woman into a perceived insecurity of his (really all men by association).

Kryprokate:

I’m sticking with my assertion that lots of guys love to show off a hot woman to other guys to gain their respect and increase their status. I’m not saying ALL guys want to do this and maybe you don’t, but lots of them do. I don’t want to “show off” a guy either — I’m an introverted homebody and don’t want a guy for anything but to stay home with, talk, have sex, watch movies, etc. But lots of men love to show off to their peers just like lots (probably most) women do.

Johnnycomelately:

Men don’t seek validation through females, men desire females objectively, tits are tits, don’t matter what the guys thinks. You think men watch porn to get validation?

Women desire to be desired, the process is completely about validation.

Problem with female desire to be desired is that it is not a very high bar to pass, I find it humorous that women brag-splain about getting sex from men.

“Heck, give me ten minutes to download an app and I could get a man to have sex with me in 30 minutes. Nothing to write home about.”

And from the Validation Hunting post:

The idea that men “seek validation” for their earned status or to ‘right’ past wrongs to their egos while they were working their way to that status is a social convention. The Feminine Imperative relies on memes and conventions which shift the ownership of women’s personal liabilities for their sexual strategy to men.

When men are blamed for the negative consequences of women’s sexual strategy it helps to blunt the painful truths that Jenny Bahn is (to her credit) honestly confronting in her article at 30 years old and the SMV balance shifts towards enabling men’s capacity to effect their own sexual strategy.

One of the unique aspects of the Feminine Imperative is its fluid ability to craft social conventions that obscure the worst misgivings of women’s dualistic sexual strategy (Hypergamy) and redirect the liability for them squarely on men’s shoulders. I covered many of these conventions in Operative Social Conventions, but chief among them is the utility of shame.

Shaming features in a majority of feminine social conventions used against men because women are conditioned to fear social ostracization as part of their same-sex peer socialization. Little girls punish each other by ‘not-being-friends-with’ another girl in their peer clutch. Using shame is a skill women learn early in life to effect the ends of their developing solipsism.

If men can be shamed into believing that their natural predisposition toward sexually desiring high SMV, physically ideal specimens of women is due to an insecurity with their personal status the effect would be one of leveling the SMP playing field. “Men only want hot women to feed their egos and impress other men” translates into shaming men (the more desirable men who can merit the attention of a high SMV woman) for being insecure with the perceptions of other men.

This carefully removes any negative association with women’s competitiveness for higher tier men, convinces women themselves that “men are just like that” to Buffer against rejection, and puts the burden of that competition on the man in the hopes that he’ll pair with a woman who is of lower SMV for fear of being shamed about his “insecurity” of wanting other men to see his status as higher than it should be.

Thus, the optimized ends of Hypergamy – a woman pairing with an SMV superior man – are better effected by a social convention.

I should also add that this social convention dovetails with another useful convention that relies on a similar dynamic – that of women complaining men sexually objectify women. The simple truth is that it’s part of men’s neurological firmware to see women’s bodies as objects. It’s a well studied fact that when men see an arousing woman’s semi-nude body it triggers the same area of our brains associated with tool use. Sexual objectification is a feature for men, not a bug.

I’ve gotten into this debate on other forums and comment threads, but it bears repeating. My N-count is a bit more than 40 women, and of those women never did I make an approach (or go along with a woman opening me) with a forethought of wanting to impress my male friends. In fact there were some women I got with I’d rather my friends at the time knew nothing about.

The debate usually spins from there about how men just “do it unconsciously”. That’s an easy fallback, but I’d argue that the limbic and visceral incentive of wanting to sexually experience a smoking hot HB9.5 supersedes any subconscious thought of how good a guy will look when he shows her off to his buddies. I’ve been with strippers, a girl who was in Playboy in the 90’s, and several other women most guys just fantasize about – half the reason I stayed with the BPD girlfriend for so long was because she was just so fucking hot – but not once did I have any thought of brandishing any of them to improve my status with my peers. In fact I preferred we just get after it at her or my place than make any conscious effort on my part to show her off.

From 20 Questions:

This’ll sound facetious, but I’ve never thought of sex as being “validating” or ego-affirming. I honestly think a lot of that expectation comes from a feminized conditioning about “how sex should be” for men. I was, and still kind of am, more into sex as experience. It’s always been something fun to enjoy with a woman for me, not some meaningful act of cosmic significance. I’ve had sex with women I loved and women I didn’t, some were memorable, some were…meh. Even in my bluest of blue pill days my ‘validation’ came from other sources, not sex.

So the question for the weekend is this, as a man, do you give any headspace at all to considering how your status might improve with other men if you’re seen with a hot woman?

When you see a guy who’s physically an obvious 1-2 SMV degrees lower than the woman he’s with, do you think any better of him or do you presume the imbalance is due to some other external factor (such as wealth or fame)?

Do you see the method behind the madness of shaming-down apex Men in order to better optimize Hypergamy for “lesser” SMV women?

 

422 comments

  1. “do you give any headspace at all to considering how your status might improve with other men if you’re seen with a hot woman?”

    No. But I give headspace to the fact that been seen with a non-hot woman decreases my value for other women.

    “1-2 SMV degrees lower than the woman he’s with, do you think any better of him”

    When this happens the woman is usually treating the guy like shit, so I feel pity.

    “Do you see the method”

    Half projection, half agenda.

  2. took me a minute, but no, i give _zero_ headspace to what other men think of my girls. and i think no better or worse of my friends based on their girls’ looks. i do think better or worse of them based on their girls’ behaviors though.

  3. Men like attractive women, but I don’t think they are really all THAT picky about it! I think it’s a matter of threshold. I think 7 and up is enough to please even the highest SMV man providing the woman is a perfect fit personality wise and is accommodating, kind, loyal, etc.

    Over and over I have seen the most desirable men pick good looking but not gorgeous wives. I think this is because the most attractive women are often huge pains in the asses, and guys who naturally attract women (confident, busy ones with personal missions) don’t want to deal with a pain in the ass for a wife.

    While not all men who end up with the most attractive women are doing it for validation (some very lucky men do find the 10’s who are also good wives), A LOT of the men who in adolescence and early adulthood were not successful with women DO tend to go for 10’s for both validation as well as to experience something they spent a long time wanting from afar.

    In contrast, men who grew up as natural alphas, in my observation as outlined above, often end up married to 7’s or 8’s, perhaps after having slept with and Nexted a series of super hotties.

    All of this said, I do not deny that some women will overemphasize what I have described above to soothe their own egos in the way that you described, essentially trying to tear down men for wanting very beautiful women if they themselves do not fit the bill.

    Just my take anyway!

  4. Oh and one more thing. I can only speak for myself, but when I use the term validation, I am not necessarily using it to mean external (from other men) validation. I just mean that men who struggle getting women for a big chunk of their lives often attach being able to do so with success, and therefore will seek to achieve it in order to validate themselves, perhaps to themselves alone. Men who have not had to struggle much don’t build that deep association, they more take it for granted.

  5. Interesting article. It sounds like there is potential for the “arm candy” theory to become self-fulfilling, as guys buy into the premise and look for validation through what they are told is validating.

    At the same time, I also feel there is some truth to the notion that many men have egos which they seek to bolster through material status symbols, including money, cars, clothing, and women. Is calling out this behavior any more shaming than calling out hypergamous practices?

  6. I think that if I spent any time worrying about how my fellow men/brothers/colleagues think of me based on the women I have around me, I would have already shot up a school a long time ago much as Elliot Roger did. That should tell you a lot about me actually, but it should also tell women that such thoughts or obsessions in the minds of men are so rare as to be a sign of mental illness.

    When I see a guy with a woman 1-2+ higher than him on the SMV, I usually think that he’s in for a world of hurt down the line. That’s my honest gut reaction, I just presume that he’s going to have trouble and loose her at some point.

    Rollo, I don’t think anyone who’s read your blog needed to have that pointed out to them, not that this post wasn’t excellent.

  7. I would assume that I was missing something, and that despite any perceived imbalance, he did have the advantage. Of course, that all depends on attitudes, and who appears in control.

    The only space for a man to worry about the status effects of a woman he is with is at the point in his career where a spouse is necessary for negotiating the business politics and for networking with the other wives. Even then, the matter is less one of her attractiveness–although that does matter to the women with whom she is interacting–and more of loyalty and utility. He needs to demonstrate that he has the support behind him to successfully manage his life and his work.

    The Shadowed Knight

  8. I concur that most men do not seek validation from other men by displaying eye candy on their arm. But the inverse is true. I think most men are embarrassed being seen with a woman significantly below the man’s SMV. My ex wife was a solid 7 when we married. She then packed on the weight and looked awful. I was ashamed to be seen with her. It made me feel like a loser, as if I didn’t already feel bad enough that she was supposed to be my sole source of sexual pleasure. I’ve seen the guys at the mall walking with their troll wives, looking like they want to put a bullet in their head. You can see it through the body language, the man hanging back, not holding hands and the feigned interest in their surroundings. The shame is real.

  9. Rollo,

    For me, status is an important consideration for DATING, but never sex. Sexual desire can come in many forms, sometimes not with somebody you’d like to seriously date.

    MANY girls fall into the “Do-able but not Date-able” category for me.

    Arm candy is a huge reason why I wouldn’t seriously date a below average girl, or average looking girl.

    Having a hot girl with you that’s into you just further affirms how much you are the man at any venue you enter. The bar, the casino, the party, the gathering, the whatever. I like when other guys look at me with that “how did he do it?” look. I love being the center of attention, of love being envied. I love the respect that comes with having what every guy wants.

  10. So the question for the weekend is this, as a man, do you give any headspace at all to considering how your status might improve with other men if you’re seen with a hot woman?

    In my profession, it’s good to bring a hottie to firm events, and eventually to be married to a hottie (for her age, after having given you 4 children), but the feminists are wrong to say men ONLY want a hot girl to impress other men or improve status. First and foremost I want to be with a hottie 100% because it’s ingrained in my DNA to want to procreate with a beautiful young woman. And like you I have hooked up with women I would not tell anyone about–not fatties, but for other reasons (low quality single mothers or butter faces with hot bodies). Boobs and a tight tummy and ass are boobs and a tight tummy and ass.

    When you see a guy who’s physically an obvious 1-2 SMV degrees lower than the woman he’s with, do you think any better of him or do you presume the imbalance is due to some other external factor (such as wealth or fame)?

    It is due to money “traditional alpha” status 100% of the time. This is a simple fact, not my opinion.

    Do you see the method behind the madness of shaming-down apex Men in order to better optimize Hypergamy for “lesser” SMV women?

    Yep.

  11. I agree – the goal is almost never validation from other men. But internal validation? The validation of having achieved success and the rewards thereof? Yes, I think that’s part of it.

  12. Hi Rollo

    Can you point me to those studies regarding “men’s neurological firmware to see women’s bodies as objects”?

    And another great post!

    A

  13. @Jeremy,

    Male success all seems to hinge on internal validation. Women seem to hinge almost entirely on external validation. I have objects I have carefully crafted and created sitting around me right now. The main reason I have put up pictures of them on other forums is to get advice on how to get better. I don’t need external validation that I have done well.

    I always notice that the women who also do this always make a point to let everyone know that they are women. So that everyone knows to focus on the person behind the work and not the work itself. My work is meant to draw attention to my work. The women’s work is meant to draw attention to the women.

    And when I see a man 1-2 points of SMV below his woman I think she’s cheating on him. Then if she’s hot enough I think about how I would run game on her when he walks away. There is no way such a relationship can last.

  14. I love arm candy! I’m not above admitting it! Of course during sex, it’s only about how I feel. But in public, I’d be a liar to say getting props didn’t feel nice. And yes, perhaps it makes up for being unpopular way back in middle school.

  15. Also if any woman ever starts improving herself (losing weight for example) it pretty much means whatever boyfriend/husband she is is gone. Unless he has been running some harsh dread game on her. Otherwise it means that she knows that at, say, 150 pounds he will stay with her and still put her on a pedestal. So when she gets down to 110 pounds she knows that she is now above him and she becomes very insecure. Almost sad. She no longer enjoys sex even though it is exactly the same sex. And she is now open to branch swing.

    One of my plates lost 40 pounds over the last year. Her boyfriend, oh so supportive, should either have run harsh dread game on her or dumped her hard. He’s so happy that she’s fit again. Unaware that she is now my plate though and wants to branch swing from him.

    She is now at the weight she was when they first met and started dating. He hasn’t changed. She is just aware that he won’t control her with dread game or dump her if she does get fat and because of that she no longer finds him attractive.

  16. Perhaps I should have cheated on my wife when she was pregnant? Or rather then being the doting loving supportive husband I should have told her that the fat she gained made her unattractive and put dread into her. Once she lost that baby fat? She no longer enjoyed sex with me. She knew I would love her and adore her even when she was fat. Made me a lesser man in her eyes.

  17. @StringsofCoins

    I am reasonably certain it’s internal validation for everyone, perhaps just different strategies to achieve it.

  18. I’m sick of this shit from the cultural narrative.

    Women objectify themselves and one another. Walk through the main floor of any major department store and it’s ALL for women to artificially “enhance” their looks. Why? Because they need to get men to do shit for them. It’s not male pressure and “beuaty standards”, that is an attempt to twist reality 180 degrees into a shaming tactic. It’s their own intrasexual arms race.

    I don’t give a shit about any of that.. I’d rather a real, healthy woman in a simple, not-too-revealing outfit, little to no makeup covering her glowing skin and lustrous hair – which comes from a good diet, not starving – with, and this is crucial – a pleasant demeanour…. over some cyborg bitch in a luxury brand-name getup, tattooed eyeliner, botoxed rictus, fake tits, etc with an attitude to match. I see these women and I think: why??? they look like robot clowns set to bitch mode . who are they going to these comical lengths for? Act bitchy and entitled enough and people will believe you are high status? I can see your fertility – or lack of it – and your genetic stock perfectly well through all that, honey. I am not buying it, and it ain’t cause I can’t afford it.

    Reminds me of that Onion headline: “Plastic Surgery Makes 40-year-old Woman look like Fucked Up 39 & 1/2 year-old”

    Fashion models? They look like adolescent boys. Straight men are not trying to make women live up to that, don’t pin that shit on me, media. And look at the ads, the way they look into the camera, they come off looking like horrible people to be around. I know, I know, they’re told to put that face on, they take 1000 shots to get just that right amount of disdain and cuntishness… but why?? for whom? To make guys think “oh jeez, I wish I could be good enough to get someone like her who is a pain in the ass to hang out with?” No, not at all. They don’t stand to make money off the likes of me. The message is to women is: you’re not good enough, keep trying, keep spending. The truth is, and you’ll never hear the women on the View or some shit say it: most women are highly suggestible, and they will spend all their money (and yours if you let them) chasing something they’ll never get and no one really wants anyway. And the saddest part of it is, there’s a small little shrivelled place in the corner of most of their hearts where it would make them feel fantastic to have other people – especially other women – envy them. Otherwise it wouldn’t work on them.

    Do I want to inspire envy in other guys? Fuck no. I want the true hotness of my woman to be something only I know.

  19. Agree with Mike. High status women don’t bang total losers. Their hypergamous instincts are usually spot on when it comes to weeding out insecurity and weakness. Therefore, if you are sexing a 8-10 it must mean you’re doing at least something right.

  20. After having slept with more than my share of women, I tend to look more for the women who I think will blow my mind in bed. I feel like sometimes my attraction for hot women disappoints when we’re in bed and she just can’t perform. But its still there that desire for hot women, and yeah I think alot of men enjoy having a hot woman and occasionally showing her off..but thats a side issue, nowhere near the primary reason for dating a woman. Of course then there is the possibility of using her as bait to snare other hot women…I’m sure the fact that it works like gold is another body blow to feminist idealogy.

  21. Id say for me its not validation but more related to status. When I am with a HB9 I can tell my male friends have envy and more respect, it derives more confidence in myself. When females see me, even more confidence via pre-selection, I see it as purely increasing my overall inner strength. I am already very confident, so having arm candy just solidifies and at times evens boosts what I have. Now having a anything below HB6 as arm candy has the opposite effect.

  22. Q1. So the question for the weekend is this, as a man, do you give any headspace at all to considering how your status might improve with other men if you’re seen with a hot woman?
    A1. Nope. Actually if with a specifically hot woman, I probably don’t want to be seen by others. In contrast, having a specifically “quality” (with or without hotness) woman definitely helps social standing (competently arranging parties, etc) but only as a threshold.

    Q2. When you see a guy who’s physically an obvious 1-2 SMV degrees lower than the woman he’s with, do you think any better of him or do you presume the imbalance is due to some other external factor (such as wealth or fame)?
    I’m sure I can’t rate men as closely as I can women. If there is obvious imbalance (3 or more points) then it’s obviously something external.

    Q3. Do you see the method behind the madness of shaming-down apex Men in order to better optimize Hypergamy for “lesser” SMV women?
    Sure, among other things. Don’t women care even more heatedly about betas’ arm candy?

  23. It also sounds like a sort of attempt at defacing the status of high SMV and MMV men. I actually know a guy who will date any woman who looks a certain, specific way because that’s all he wants: the status symbol. He doesn’t care if he’s having sex with her, if she’s having sex with anyone else or even if she’s completely insane, as long as she looks the part and smiles and holds onto his arm in public. He has openly said as much and his relationships all go exactly as you’d expect them to.

    What these women are also doing when they declare this about high SMV and MMV men dating high SMV women is they’re comparing the two. They’re not only trying to say that women’s looks are irrelevant in attraction and that valuable men who pick valuable women are immature, but they’re implying these men aren’t actually high value to begin with. They’re implying these men are actually social-networking obsessed Betas in disguise, actively trying to devalue them in the eyes of other women.

  24. Yohami knocks it out of the park. “No. But I give headspace to the fact that been seen with a non-hot woman decreases my value for other women.”

    Yeppers.

  25. Being seen with a hot woman would mostly have value in getting more hot women. Probably only comes into play with guys if you are trying to con them into something, and of course you don’t want to embarrass yourself

  26. TO me the TL:DR is:

    A man doesn’t get with a hot woman to show her off to friends or up his status.

    A man gets with a hot woman because he likes fucking her.

    A man stays with that hot woman because he wants to keep fucking her.

    A man considers marrying that hot woman because he doesn’t want anyone else fucking her.

  27. This is one of those situations which, in my mind, translates to, ‘porque no los dos?’ There is most definitely the base level of desire for the woman’s body that leads to these men being seen with highly attractive women, and indeed that is what leads into that image that they use to propel themselves up the hierarchy they are a part of. That hotness is what attracts other men to that woman that he’s with, and the fact that she’s with him and therefore not with them puts him in a place of desirability in the hierarchy. Ambitious men will always vie for top positions in the power structures they take part in,and a hot woman is definitely an effective tool in obtaining that position.

    Do I care whether or not the woman I’m with raises my social status? Not really, at the moment I suppose I don’t have the game to be pulling 8-9’s. I have worried in the past about the girls I’m with not being cute enough and the people I associate with judging me for it, though that’s certainly something I’m sure every guy has gone through.

    As for whether or not I see a man 1-2 points lower in terms of looks than the woman he’s with positively vs thinking it’s his money, it is entirely dependent on context. If I see a greasy, pock-marked musician or a short, stocky salesman with really attractive women, I certainly do give them props for having good game or other skill that attracted such high-level talent. If I see some portly schmuck on the television with a smoking hot blonde bikini model, I certainly attribute at least some of it as a result of his money or fame. It’s not impossible that he has crazy tight game in addition to that money, but it’s hard to eliminate a big bank account as a factor in his success.

  28. So the question for the weekend is this, as a man, do you give any headspace at all to considering how your status might improve with other men if you’re seen with a hot woman?

    Yes and no but it is or was never my primary consideration when hooking up with a woman. Hot chicks come with as many liabilities as they do assets in terms of social capital amongst men. Introduce a hot babe into a cadre of men and they can cause more problems then positives for sure. Plus if your frame is rattled dealing with hot chick well..you know, you lose points in man world for being pussy whipped.

    When you see a guy who’s physically an obvious 1-2 SMV degrees lower than the woman he’s with, do you think any better of him or do you presume the imbalance is due to some other external factor (such as wealth or fame)?

    I think a few things:
    first, “Good luck with that buddy, watch out for hypergamy, it’ll kick you in the ass”
    second I think, “Good for you man, not sure what you have but you are playing your cards well right now, good for you”
    Third. “Hey if that guy can get that, maybe I can get…”

    Do you see the method behind the madness of shaming-down apex Men in order to better optimize Hypergamy for “lesser” SMV women?

    Sure do. Now that I own red pill filter glasses, every time I hear some kind of shaming tactics invoked, I immediately question the subtext and motive on the part of the shamer.

    On balance if a man lands a hot babe at or higher than his SMV I say bravo to him and hope he can bear the “burden of performance”. If I see a man with a ditch pig I think, “I hope she cooks, cleans and fucks like a champion” because who wants negative social equity unless it comes with a lot of back end benefits. Point being negative women in looks or attitude have more power to compromise a mans “status” than a hot woman has to improve it.

    In fact, by even buying into the “status” bullshit, you are simply stepping into girl world anyhow. They collect features on men like fucking girl scout badges, men just want chicks who are DTF, pleasant to hang out with and not hideous. In my peer group men earn the RESPECT of other men on the basis of character and accomplishments. It is typical of a woman to conflate “status” with “respect”. As a man I don’t have to like someone to respect them, conversely I can have fun with someone and have almost no respect for them. I have learned that if you view the world simply as a layer cake of status you will never be happy with your station in life so fuck status, simply be true to yourself and it’ll mostly work out right.

    PS, status obsession to me, seems like the obsession with oppression and cultural Marxism etc from our favorite girls in the world. They prove my point, none of them are happy.

  29. In my biz I often attend high roller fundraiser events w such couples. And I have wondered how that relationship works. I would agree, I don’t think it’s because the man is seeking to up his status, he has that girl because of having status already. He has her because he can. She is attracted to his status, connections, lifestyle, etc. I wonder if it bothers these guys to think if they lost it all they would likely lose her too? That she probably loves what he has rather than him? Or maybe that’s female projection? And I wonder do these gals miss true love and attraction? Have a quiet stud boy on the side? Or does having a rich guy provide the affirmation true love and attraction do? I have been offered the role is sugar daddy mistress on two occasions but passed. To me, it felt like selling out. Plus bad juju, infidelity. IMHO anyway. It would have been opportunistically good, I certainly could have used the capital infusion to grow my biz, but I couldn’t do the deal. C’est la vie! I am ok with my decision and would do the same again.

  30. Real rap here, to any women reading this.

    The reason you were able to get married is because your husband liked fucking you, wanted to continue fucking you and didn’t want anyone else to fuck you.

    If a man breaks up with you, it’s because he didn’t get to fuck you, doesn’t want to fuck you, already got to fuck you and doesn’t want to continue doing so, or doesn’t care if other men fuck you.

  31. @YOHAMI

    “do you give any headspace at all to considering how your status might improve with other men if you’re seen with a hot woman?”

    No. But I give headspace to the fact that been seen with a non-hot woman decreases my value for other women.

    Abso-fucking-lutely. As I explained to kate on that thread, men want a hot woman on their arm because 1) she’s hot so she passes the boner test and 2) for pre-selection by other women. It’s entirely about getting laid. Period. She isn’t the source of his status, she’s the result of it.

    Women want a hot man on their arm to make all them other betches jealous. He is the source of her status. It’s a totally different motivation The funny thing is, they’re both seeing the same reaction from women, but they’re interpreting it differently. She sees a bump in her status (“Look, they’re all jealous! I’m awesome!”), he sees a chance to get laid by more than just the chick using him for status.

    When you see a guy who’s physically an obvious 1-2 SMV degrees lower than the woman he’s with, do you think any better of him or do you presume the imbalance is due to some other external factor (such as wealth or fame)?

    While I’ll admit to jealousy (“Man I wish was fucking her…”), it doesn’t make him seem amazing to me. At best I see him as competition. At worst (and in most cases), like other commenters here I see a dude headed for some real pain. If he’s married to her, I see a dude headed to the poor house.

    Do you see the method behind the madness of shaming-down apex Men in order to better optimize Hypergamy for “lesser” SMV women?

    Yep. As I mentioned in a previous thread (I believe I was responding to something Dr. J said), it’s really obvious that the modern feminist movement was started by unattractive angry women. All the tactics of it are intended to push high SMV women out of the game by putting their standards impossibly high. Meanwhile low SMV men are pushed completely out of the game by the availability of high SMV men to mid-low SMV women.

    It’s brilliant in concept, but in reality it’s working out to less and less people getting married, declining population among the groups where it takes hold, a lot of HB10s shitting on HG10s until it’s too late to capitalize on their looks anymore, and the vast majority of men just living as BBs in miserable marriages where neither party is happy or leaving the game altogether.

  32. “I don’t give a shit about any of that.. I’d rather a real, healthy woman in a simple, not-too-revealing outfit, little to no makeup covering her glowing skin and lustrous hair – which comes from a good diet, not starving – with, and this is crucial – a pleasant demeanour…. over some cyborg bitch in a luxury brand-name getup, tattooed eyeliner, botoxed rictus, fake tits, etc with an attitude to match. I see these women and I think: why??? they look like robot clowns set to bitch mode . who are they going to these comical lengths for? Act bitchy and entitled enough and people will believe you are high status? I can see your fertility – or lack of it – and your genetic stock perfectly well through all that, honey. I am not buying it, and it ain’t cause I can’t afford it”.

    I know right. After you take the red pill and you know exactly how women think you have a 0 tolerance policy (or at least I do) for a bitchy wishy washy attitude. I love nexting women who think I’m going to play their game or don’t follow up when they think I will. Being super nice and professional without a hint of sexual desire causes untold amounts of annoyance and hamster spin for them. Especially if the previous conversation was super flitertatious. I love it almost more then sex now! I’m addicted to fucking with their validation codes. That’s how you hack the feminine imperative matrix.

  33. Rollo,

    I think you are on the mark and off the mark at the same time on this one. I’ve banged some fatties in my time and would be embarrassed to both men and other women if I was seen in public with them.

    You are correct in asserting that is has never been a first thought. I’ve never approached a woman and though “wow, this would totally validate me to friends and other chicks.”

    However, about 5 seconds after I dump a load in a chick, my next thought is whether I am going to send her home in a taxi, or is she staying the night and going to breakfast with me in the morning.

    If she was HB7 or below, I would send her home.

    It is a valid SMV strategy to having a HB9 or 10 clearly playing the role of a red pill woman. Other women are drawn like flies.

    Also a show of game superiority to other men. They know I’m either rich, fuck like a rock star, or have a huge cock. Happens to be all of the above for me, and they treat me that much better.

    No need to assert silverback gorilla dominance in a new environment when my swagger and girl does it for me.

    Its like pulling up in a brand new Ferrari, people know you are somebody because you’re driving a car that costs more than their house and treat you much better. Pull up in a used ford escort and the treatment you get is much different.

  34. The simplest answer is usually the correct one: simple projection. Women get validation from being with high value men and love showing them off to their friends, so they project this behavior onto men. Women are defined by the man they’re with, so they imagine men feel the same way about the woman they’re with.

  35. Also I think the h 10 arm candy is the one at risk, she is easily replaced by a high status man. Maybe these women think they can get him to marry them then take him to the cleaners but rich guys aren’t stupid. He’s gonna lawyer up and lock it down. She’d be lucky to go the long game in this scenario, not him. Her looks don’t trump his $$$ power. If people shame him for wanting arm candy why don’t they shame her for being it? Who’s “winning” here in the photo above? She looks scared as hell to me!

  36. @marriedalpha

    I’ve banged some fatties in my time and would be embarrassed to both men and other women if I was seen in public with them.

    Keywords: “banged some fatties”
    You never sought anything other than sex from the fatties. You never attempted to put them on your arm. You a priori understood that as far as validation goes, those woman might be a drag on your image. However, they did have something to offer as far as internal validation. As a result, they were only an easy lay. So basically, while you were not seeking to improve your status with those women, you were seeking to feel better with activities they could help you with.

    With attractive women, I’d wager you’re also not looking for validation of your status externally. The purpose for them being in your life is simply to bang them. The difference is, with the attractive women, you know that they cannot reflect negatively on your alpha status in a social setting, so they are allowed to meet the friends and family.

    Again, as Yohami said… Men do not seek, nor obsess over social status that women offer them. That’s a ridiculous line of thought. Instead, men seek to simply limit the damage from bad women to the status they have already achieved.

  37. Nope.

    All-male groups have intense, early, and complete initiation in which a new member must prove himself. Whether by skill on the soccer field or fortitude in a military barrack, men quickly determine their comparative ranks — and then tend to happily accept that, since we are used to being gears in a bigger machine.

    All-female groups are the opposite. Constant need to prove oneself, often for years.

    Consider two church fund-raisers.

    The first is run by guys. Perhaps a barbecue or something. A new member wants to join the committee. They invite him go to lunch together, and then ruthlessly grill him. Here are some past difficulties and complications — what would he have done? It turns out the new guy used to run a similar fund-raiser at a much bigger church. He might be put as second-in-commend or even asked to lead the committee. And wherever he is put, everyone is content because he earned his place by demonstrating his ability. The machine starts its work efficiently.

    The same church has another fund-raiser run by a committee of all women. Perhaps it is a fancy dinner event. A new member wants to join. She is told by the committee leader (an ancient women who jealously guards the role she acquired for reasons of history, not merit) that she is very welcome and of course they could use more help. She is assigned to tasks like setup and cleanup. The new woman offers to help more — she used to run a professional kitchen and could do a lot more for the event. But her offers are gently, if rudely, refused. The new woman quickly gets the sense that if she proves herself for a number of months she might possibly be allowed to handle money, and if she proves herself for a number of years she might finally be allowed to manage other helpers.

    To summarize, if I attended a social event with an attractive female friend instead of my wife, the men I know would be curious about that story but not re-evaluate my status in the group because I was not re-proving my capability in the tasks the group values and works on. But the women attending, who constantly re-evaluate everyone, would notice.

  38. Also I am not a hb10 by any means, I’d say a 7. I think these two men (both very intelligent skilled self made men) were attracted to my 1.) being younger and also 2.) able to hold and follow interesting conversation and 3.) I think they admired my biz and wanted to support it. Or maybe they just wanted to hang me. In any case, I’ll never know…

    Most of the men in this category that I know are 1.) married to their 1st wife and either are faithful or they keep a quiet piece on the side but don’t divorce or 2.) if they do remarry it’s usually to someone younger, fit, smart, socially gracious, and attractive (7-8) but not hb10 arm candy.

  39. BTW, is that girl in the picture famous? If so, what exactly happened to her arm? That’s a huge scar to be on a woman so attractive. Doesn’t seem right that someone botched her bicep implant surgery so badly.

  40. Never once thought about my friend’s approval or otherwise, of the women I was banging. However two experiences do resonate.

    The first is that when I was with my second wife (smoking hot 8, unfortunately Borderline Personality Disorder and eventually borderline psychotic) lots of men wanted to know how hot she was in bed. At that point it was obvious that she was Arm Candy, at least to them.

    My second experience was with a friend, a natural Alpha, in England we call such a guy “a serial shagger”. His tastes are very conventional, mainstream blondes pretty much 100% of the time. he married a much younger blonde with very large breasts.

    For a while I was dating a woman who had a kinda untidy style, kinda French-style, like in those fifties black and white movies. After I had dated her for a month my Alpha friend told me she was not good-looking enough for me. I was surprised, more by his perceptions than anything else. Nothing changed for me, I continued to date her, that woman was an absolute animal in bed. Loved every moment, did not update my friend with the details

  41. This is being played as whether men use high SMV women to signal status to other men. I’ve never cared what other men think. The closest I’ve ever gotten to this is liking being seen with several hot women just because of the pre-selection value and as a way of triggering female competition. Women thinking men want to be seen with hotties by other men has to be projection.

  42. To put it more succintly: men use status to get good looking women. Women use good looks to get status from men.

  43. I think part of this goes back to men having the Hunger (the Thirst) and women really don’t. And all the usual complaints from women about being objectified, same thing. It makes perfect sense for a man to say “I really do like the hamburger, even better than the high-priced steak sometimes. But when I want a steak, I want a steak.” It’s a girlish thing to take pictures of your food to make others jealous.

  44. From the wisdom of Wukong: “To put it more succintly: men use status to get good looking women. Women use good looks to get status from men.”

    Yep.

  45. I (male 29 years old) have never devoted any head-space at all to the notion of another man’s SMV being higher because of his arm candy, and I have never imagined that another man would perceive me as having a higher SMV because of my arm candy (I do think, however, it is obvious that arm candy will certainly change a woman’s perspective of a man’s SMV.)
    I have heard some people allude to the fact that, instead of using arm candy to acquire validation from others, they are likely using arm candy to prove to THEMSELVES that they have a high SMV. This seams plausible to me, however, if this is the only reason for arm candy, why do men hire escorts for the sole purpose of having arm candy? Certainly this would not provide any kind of internal validation, but we do see this scenario occur. Why? I don’t know.

  46. ————
    “Do you give any headspace at all to considering how your status might improve with other men if you’re seen with a hot woman?”

    — No.

    ————
    “When you see a guy who’s physically an obvious 1-2 SMV degrees lower than the woman he’s with, do you think any better of him or do you presume the imbalance is due to some other external factor (such as wealth or fame)?”

    — Wealth, unless I recognize him, then fame. Years ago I had a high end sports car for a weekend (6 figure price). I was standing by the parked car at a friend’s house in a nice neighbourhood. An HB9 comes jogging up the street, her eyes pass right through me like I’m invisible. She looks at the car then immediately gazes back to me with a great smile on her face. I call them money-bunnies.

    ————
    “Do you see the method behind the madness of shaming-down apex Men in order to better optimize Hypergamy for “lesser” SMV women?”

    — In sports it’s called “trash talking.” The attempt is to lower the other person’s belief in themselves so that you can handle them. A woman has to slay a man’s self-belief to have any chance of controlling him, no matter what his SMV is.

  47. Men hire escorts as arm candy because they need the social proof any way they can get it, and they have the money to throw at it. Those women are purely acting as hired-guns of social-proof. If you’re an elite man, you can’t be seen without some form of arm candy, or it actually looks bad on you.

    Those women are in no way contributing to that man’s status, they are simply there as ornamentation on an existing Rolls Royce that would look bad without the ornamentation.

    Is that metaphor too strong?

  48. fopdespot,says “Do I care whether or not the woman I’m with raises my social status? Not really, at the moment I suppose I don’t have the game to be pulling 8-9’s. I have worried in the past about the girls I’m with not being cute enough and the people I associate with judging me for it, though that’s certainly something I’m sure every guy has gone through.”

    Which makes me wonder now. Besides just projection by women about status, is there also apex fallacy involved? If a guy is a 9, say, and he doesn’t want to lower himself by only dragging around 7s, then yeah he is kinda worried about his status, even though like lesser men he is more concerned about not lowering it with women rather than raising it with women.

  49. I could care less what men think of an attractive woman I’m with. If anything I don’t want to parade her around because I know how thirsty and backstabbing guys can be to get some ass. Having every guy you pass leering at your date isn’t exactly enjoyable. Nick Krauser’s recent memoir has a money quote along the lines of “never trust a guy who isn’t getting laid”. That covers most men, right? The validation I get from a hot girl is her wanting to be with me. A tiny minority of guys might like showing off arm candy, but I’ve never witnessed this in person or heard men discuss it.

  50. @myrealitie, re: “I just mean that men who struggle getting [steaks] for a big chunk of their lives often attach being able to do so with [good eatin’], and therefore will seek to achieve [steaks] in order to [eat them], perhaps to themselves alone. Men who have not had to struggle much don’t [put up with bad eatin’], they more take [good eatin’] for granted.”

  51. @TheRedBill

    This seams plausible to me, however, if this is the only reason for arm candy, why do men hire escorts for the sole purpose of having arm candy? Certainly this would not provide any kind of internal validation, but we do see this scenario occur. Why? I don’t know.

    A valid question, and one I will try to answer from my brushes with the part of society where that happens. Guys usually have arm candy for social events that are related to the maintenance of their own status. It’s essentially part of their job to show up at these events displaying signs of the status they’ve already acquired: a $10k suit, a $15k watch, a $250k car, an HB9 date.

    To show up without those things would result in people questioning his right to remain in high society. Now he could just bring a date, but there’s an element of chance there. What if he can’t get a hot enough woman in time? What if she flakes? He can’t take that chance, and her failure to show would have real consequences for him. A paid escort is going to show. It’s her job.

    It’s not about his gaining status in these cases either; it’s about not losing it.

  52. @jeremy

    The girl is Padma Lakshmi, was married to Salman Rushdie for some time. Her wiki entry states a car crash caused the scar. Read into it and you’ll see that even at her age she has AF/BB working for her.

  53. Seething Lurker also concurs that the status effect is one-way. “I think most men are embarrassed being seen with a woman significantly below the man’s SMV.”

  54. @Ra Sputin

    Whoa, Padma hit the wall. Glad the scar on her arm wasn’t worse, but she is clearly on the downward slope now 😦

  55. @Bloom, re: “I don’t think it’s because the man is seeking to up his status, he has that girl because of having status already.”

    Yes.

    re: “And I wonder do these gals miss true love and attraction?”

    A leading question. Do you mean do the hot women miss having the feeling of true love and true attraction to their high-status men? I think a man’s dominance via status can certainly induce feelings in her of true attraction towards him. Or do you mean that since he leveraged his status then he is objectifying her and hence *he* won’t be feeling true love and true attraction to her? I think men can fall in love with an attractive woman easily.

  56. re: WAGS

    Has anyone ever actually believed that the reason a $10M basketball player spent a fortune on a hot babe was so his friends would high-five him?

  57. Interestingly, maybe, I think women use greater betas as their arm candy, to show off to other women. Just like their purses and their shoes. “Where did you get your man? I need me one too!”

  58. This post is arguing against a straw man because I NEVER said, nor even remotely implied, that “Men only want hot women to feed their egos and impress other men”. You added the only in there, Rollo.

    OF COURSE MEN LIKE HOT WOMEN BECAUSE THEY WANT TO FUCK THEM. Seriously, who would argue that? I never said anything to even remotely question that. However, they can ALSO like the envy, admiration, and social status they get from showing off the hot chick as a status object. These things are not even slightly mutually exclusive.

    I can enjoy driving my hot, super fast car because driving a fast car is fun. I can ALSO enjoy the fact that other people think my car is cool and therefore think I’m cooler for having it.

    I can enjoy living in my nice home and swimming in my pool for the enjoyment of those things. I can ALSO enjoy the fact that other people think my home and pool are cool and therefore think I’m cooler for having them.

    Get it? This is not complicated stuff.

    Nor is it particularly gender related. It’s personality related. SOME people have ambitious, social striving, power hungry, extroverted type personalities and tend to care A LOT about status symbols and that absolutely includes women. I work in a profession surrounded by that type of men and I spend all day with high ego, alpha, ambitious men and the idea that men don’t care about their status with other men, and don’t jockey for status, and don’t use any tool at their disposal including flaunting status symbols, is laughable. These dudes will compete and jockey for status and try to pull rank over each with EVERYTHING, from the smallest and most petty thing (the business cards scene in American psycho comes to mind) to bragging about who controls the most business.

    On the other hand, in my family most of the men are scientists/engineers, and they don’t have that type of personality at all. They don’t want anything flashy and don’t care about status, they just want high utility. It wouldn’t occur to them to “flaunt” a woman. So I think you’re seriously off base here and generalizing something that’s probably true of your personality to all men. Several guys in this thread have admitted liking to invoke envy and admiration so clearly you’re not right about this.

    And it varies by personality with women too. It has literally never crossed my mind to think about a man I’m with increasing or decreasing my status or what any females thought. Because he can’t increase or decrease my status, so this doesn’t even make sense. When I’ve been with hot but poor guys, people assume I’m just sex crazed. When I’ve been with hot and rich guys, I don’t think people think anything at all. And I’ve never dated a guy that wasn’t good looking but if I did I’m sure people would assume he was really rich or funny or nice or something, who knows. But it doesn’t effect my status one way or the other so who cares. I like hot guys because I’m sexually attracted to them and it does nothing one way or the other for my status. Maybe some women also enjoy hot guys because they want to show them off, I really have no idea because I’m not as familiar with women as I am with men. I don’t personally know any women like that but the women I know aren’t very representative of the average chick.

    Also, I never said or implied anything “shaming” about enjoying hot women as status symbols. I really don’t care one way or the other. I generally feel sorry for people who are overly concerned with status because it’s not a nice way to live for them. On the other hand, I think people who have zero concern with status are self sabotaging and living in a bit of a fantasy world, since status will improve your life no matter what your goal is (even if it’s just to be left alone). Because status means other people can’t tell you what to do.

    So don’t misrepresent my argument. I never said men only like hot women to show off to other guys. And I’ve never heard *anyone* say that so I think it’s a straw man. Of course guys want to fuck hot chicks for the physical enjoyment. But some of them also like the social validation/status boost. And there’s nothing wrong with that, either. The only reason this even came up is because someone was complaining about women flaunting their looks and I was simply pointing out that men flaunt women’s looks too. And my point is that there’s nothing shameful about that on either side because it’s perfectly understandable behavior.

    Also, I do not think there is any actual distinction between “internal validation”, “external validation”, and status. These are all unnecessary complications and referring to the same thing. You get “internally validated” by the actual fact of having high status and witnessing or imagining the “external validation” that reflects that status. There’s nothing useful in trying to discern between these elements — they’re all part and parcel of the same status related reward. Even monkeys have a pecking order and find it rewarding to be at the top.

  59. @Seething Lurker “But the inverse is true. I think most men are embarrassed being seen with a woman significantly below the man’s SMV”

    I think even then, the external validation is just a small piece of the pie.Endless rolls of fat and a double chin are horribly demoralizing, especially when you can’t escape them. It’s like being locked into a really, really expensive lease for a really, really crappy car, but worse, because it operates on a more fundamental (emotional) level.

    @D-Man “Fashion models? They look like adolescent boys. Straight men are not trying to make women live up to that, don’t pin that shit on me, media. ”

    Oh, but the media will try so hard to make that inane narrative work. Every time some little princess get her feelings hurt, they blame the shortcomings of the fashion industry on straight guys. Anyone who has paid any attention whatsoever to the world of fashion knows there about as many powerful straight guys in that industry as there are humpback whales in the middle of the Sahara desert..
    Yet, they push the idea successfully because women will believe anything that soothes the hamster, no matter how preposterous it is.

    Just once, I’d like to flip the script and write an equally inane “thought piece” blaming Issac Mizrahi for the shortcomings of the F-35.

  60. @jf12

    Has anyone ever actually believed that the reason a $10M basketball player spent a fortune on a hot babe was so his friends would high-five him?

    Peering deeper… if the reason Tiger Woods was seeking out hot women to improve his status, why did he keep it a secret for so long? Why wouldn’t all his friends and the entire public know about his success with women? It is entirely self-defeating for a man to keep his liasons a secret if his purpose with women is to improve his status by finding a more attractive one.

  61. @jf12 I mean does she miss feeling love for him? Or maybe that’s a mia assumption to think they don’t.

    As for why men hire hb9+ escorts, again bc they can. They have the means. Why wouldn’t they expect “quality” for their $$$? Why would anyone pay an unattractive woman to be their escort?

  62. No status-building in it for me. I realized just now that it’s bullshit. It’s a matter of very individual, personal preference and choice what kind of woman I spend time. Doing otherwise seems feminine to me when I think about it now. We men do not compete via women the way women do via men.

  63. “During Lakshmi and Forstmann’s time together, Lakshmi gave birth to a baby girl, Krishna Thea Lakshmi. At first, Lakshmi was unclear as to the identity of the father. It was later revealed that Adam Dell was the father.”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_J._Forstmann#Personal_life

    “Lakshmi dated Princess Diana’s ex, financier Theodore ‘Teddy’ Forstmann until his death in November 2011. He left an undisclosed sum of money in a trust fund for her daughter, Krishna.”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padma_Lakshmi#Personal_life

  64. re: trophy hunting

    When a man displays his Major Award, it is a reminder to him of the success of his effort.

    Maybe when a woman displays her YouRock! appreciation award, it is a reminder to her that someone thought highly of her.

  65. I’ll admit it, I like being seen in public with a girl my friends will be jealous of.

    That’s not a factor in if I’ll approach or pursue. Pretty much the only thing that influences that decision is hotness. But some vapid HB9 cum repository with a bitchy attitude and barely enough functioning neurons to form a sentence? I really don’t want anyone to know I’m hitting that.

  66. @Kryptokate, my intent here isn’t to run you up the flagpole personally, just to explore a social convention (and one I’ve covered before), but, you did write this, so I’ll add it to the discussion:

    Men absolutely enjoy social validation and the experience of social status just as much as women. Apex alphas *think* that they don’t but that’s only because they have the privilege of not having to be self-aware…they don’t think about social status because they already have it, and they simply expect and feel entitled to social validation and supplication everywhere they go. I dated a basketball player for a while, and I assure you that the amount of universal ass-kissing, deferential behavior, and supplication that a physically dominant male gets from everyone is truly breathtaking, grotesque, and far exceeds anything that even the most gorgeous woman in the world will ever experience. Because a gorgeous woman really only has about 30-40% of people kissing her ass. All women hate her, a portion of guys who are afraid of the reactions of their girlfriends/wives will refuse to even look at her or talk to her because they know it will cause them hell, and another portion of guys will react in a preemptively defensive and hostile manner because they know she would reject them. But an apex alpha has EVERYONE — grandmas, babies, men, boys, women — universally kissing his ass. And because it’s so universal he probably has almost no awareness of it occurring or how important it is to him and how upset he will be when it goes away (which it will).

    The only justice in any of this is that the physically dominant alpha male will experience a decrease in status that is as harsh and extreme as a beautiful woman, once they age and the physical prowess inevitably goes away. Athletes typically are as terrified of aging as are models.

  67. @Bloom, re: “Or maybe that’s a mia assumption to think they don’t.”

    I think maybe. Naturally there are some obvious golddiggers and statusdiggers, but I do think/know that if the men themselves have already turned their gold/status/etc ( maybe not reaching too far, massive intellects) into dominance with a woman then she could easily be attracted to his dominance directly.

  68. Physical dominance is important because it allows the dominator to impose his will physically upon the dominatee; genderizing now, he can force her to do physical stuff. And all other forms of dominance, as Ton has taught, are proxies for physical violence, but the point I want to emphasize is that for dominance these proxies are quite equivalent. The evil Beltway bandit who can make 100 villagers disappear with a curl of his lip will have hot babes scrubbing his toilets, gladly, regardless of whether he worked out at the gym that week.

    Physical beauty is another matter. It’s quite difficult to think of proxies for it.

  69. It’s projection. I’ve slowly come to realize that women project what they do/feel onto men. It’s like your treatise on how men love altruistically and women love opportunistically, which is why men project altruistic love onto women.
    I think most women get more pleasure from what their friends, family, enemies think of what a man is than they do from actually being with the man. Hence their projecting that men go for hot young things to impress their peers. It is what women do.

  70. Also, the tortured convolutions y’all are going through to try to explicate being worried about decreasing your status (being seen with a non-hot woman) versus increasing/maintaining status (being seen with a hot woman) prove that you’re wrong on this one. Something is either associated with status or it is not. The appearance of the woman on your arm can’t decrease your status unless her appearance is linked to your status in the first place.

    If you would be embarrassed to be seen with a fat ugly old chick, then you’ve laid this bare. It’s the same thing. You’re just not particularly ambitious. You don’t want to decrease your status and embarrass yourself, but you’re not ambitious enough to care about actually inducing envy and admiration in other men just for the thrill of lording it over them. But some men do. I probably see this more often than most because I work with those dudes and basically you have to be an egotistical status-obsessed person to get to the “apex” in the first place. Most regular people simply don’t see the point and likely don’t care.

    Therefore, I will concede that my perspective on how common this is may be a bit skewed by the people I’m around. And by the fact that I have blatantly had guys tell me many times that they specifically enjoy having me walk with them, or asking me to go somewhere specifically for that purpose. I concede it probably isn’t particularly common among regular non-status obsessed non-social climbing types. But it most definitely exists, and while it may not be a majority trait of men it’s not an unsignificant minority. Maybe 1/3 or 1/4 of guys are like that. Social climbing/status obsession isn’t really THATcommon with women either, you guys just notice it more because it’s most common among the hot chicks that get your attention.

  71. Pretty much every gf/wife I’ve ever had is +1-2 SMV. I can speak to what goes with that territory:

    1. Much mate guarding.
    2. Constant possibility of dread, depending on the chick.
    3. Maintenance.
    4. Great frequent Nookie.
    5. ‘Some’ satisfaction from envy/respect/admiration from other guys.

    The only reason to put up with 1, 2 and 3 is for 4.
    5 is just a byproduct of the effort.

    I did it all for the nookie. It was frequent because I made no secret that’s what I wanted.

    There is an arm-candy passive positive effect, but it doesn’t enter the mind when pursuing a hottie. Eye candy to accompany blinding blowjobs does.

  72. Yeah. When I see a hot woman I want to use my tool.

    ================

    Back when I was more actively spinning plates, I got from a number of guys, “How did you get HER?” I never had an answer. Since I started reading the manosphere I found out. I project dominance. Learned it from my first GF at age 18. Back in ’62. She taught me the rudiments of Game.

  73. Its simple the validation is the side kick the ego boost & excitement comes from getting a hot babe not from envy it will produce!
    Yes if other women notice u more that pumps u up more than anything

  74. re: scientists/engineers vs physically dominant males

    Let the cage match begin! Admittedly I have spent approximately zero time in the company of truly physically dominant males. I think they scared …

    One time about 30 years ago I happened to be in a restaurant, double dating with a fellow engineer and his wife. It was a cheap but good all-the-pasta-you-can-eat Italian place in Dallas. We were laughing and cutting up when in barged Hulk Hogan, who was maybe at his giganticest at the time. He was massive, and had no entourage. He disappeared a large chair sitting in it backwards, and simply wanted to eat. A lot. A whole lot. The man was an eating machine.

    The two waitresses kept hovering near him and touching him, and the man manager kept shooing them away, and apologizing for them. My date and the guy’s wife kept trying to look away from him and kept saying, more to themselves than to us “He’s so ugly! So, so ugly!!”, and, I swear, making whimpering noises at times. Me and the guy kept laughing and cutting up.

  75. @KK, re: “Most regular people simply don’t see the point and likely don’t care. ”

    I thought you were arguing that alpha males were the ones that didn’t care, and that us betas were slobbering to hold your hot hand so the other guys would high five our other hands.

  76. The reason I made that comment about the basketball player is to point out that he was very dependent on the regular validation he got from his status, he was just unaware of that fact because he felt so entitled to it. In his mind, he didn’t give a shit about one anyone else thought of him, ever. Easy to not care what anyone else thinks of you when you’re 6’5″ and 230 lbs of pure muscle. But this was a delusion because the reason he THOUGHT he didn’t care what anyone thought of him is because everyone treated him like gold and kissed his butt all the time (i.e. he firmly believed they all thought good things).

    However, I did not respect his status because I’m a weirdo borderline aspergers nerdy type who thinks sports are inane and that jocks are mostly dumb/boring. I liked him for the physical aspect but didn’t value or respect his position in society. And when he realized this, his utter emotional dependence on validation was revealed. Monstrous egos require constant feeding and collapse very easily. Narcissism is an over-used term that’s thrown around a lot, but lots of socially dominant “apex” type people have strong narcissistic tendencies. And this means they need constant social validation and will FLIP OUT in rage if they don’t get what they feel they deserve and are entitled to. Ironically, because they are so used to the ass-kissing and validation, they usually think they don’t care about those things. It’s only when you remove it and they fall to pieces that you see that they really do care.

  77. re: rage

    I have known more than a few, men and women, who suffer from (make others suffer from …) the narcissistic rage. But supposedly it’s due to an inferiority complex.

    In contrast, more of those I consider peers exhibit the rage to master. Which we can chalk up to a superiority complex …

  78. Its harder to rate men on a 1 to 10 scale then women especially if the man is not fat and above average height. So determining a 2 point difference in looks wouldn’t mean that much. Also, there is a 1 or 2 point swing in looks ratings. One man’s 8 could be another man’s 7 or even a six. (I put two points at the max of legitimate looks score.) And of course clothes and makeup can make a big difference. Put a 6 in a sexy dress and heels and she can look very hot. The same with a man in a suit and nice haircut.

    Now we also know that a man’s total SMV score is not just his looks. His wealth, status and game play huge roles. So if you see a girl 3 or more points hotter then you’d have to guess either the guy’s rich or high status in a way that matters to her (doesn’t have to be George Clooney) or the guy has great game. (Or a combination of all three).

    What I do when I see a couple is a start the analysis with a looks comparison; what’s their score, are they within 1 or 2 points which can just be variance, what’s the age difference, socio-economic difference, etc. If the difference is within 2 points; ie he’s a 6 and she’s an 8, that could just be natural variance. She just might like his look.

    Now if she’s taller than him, that means something. The taller she is than him the more game or status he is going to need to have. If the guy is short or average height but handsome (ie Zac Effron, Ian Somerholder), then he could legitimately attract taller and hotter girls. But if he is shorter and average in looks then he needs either game, wealth or status to keep the chick (or to even get her). If you see a 5’7″ guy with a 5’10″+ girl and the guy is not rich or famous, then game detected. The guy can keep her so long as her game is tight or up to the point that she wants long term money. As Paul Janka said, if a hot women wants money she will get money.

    So the question to Rollo’s question is “it depends”. First a point or even two difference in looks isn’t that significant. 3+ is as is significant height differences (ie taller women). If their is a significant age difference, then wealth and status are assumed. But game in itself can overcome big deficits in other value attributes. So if you see a hotter girl with an ordinary looking dude (or worse), you just may be seeing good game in practice. Check out the body language and overall vibe. How into him is she? Does he dominate her, etc? I don’t really see 3+ point disparities that often. Usually couples are assortive with looks in my experience.

  79. re: “The appearance of the woman on your arm can’t decrease your status unless her appearance is linked to your status in the first place.”

    Nonsense. You’re making a virtual argument with unconnected dots. A linguistically equivalent counterexample suffices to dispel your illusion.

    The heaviness of the load of gravel in the bed of your truck can’t decrease your speed unless the heaviness is linked to your speed.

    From this banality you pretend to conclude that gravel, or antigravel or something, is fuel.

  80. @Kryptokate

    Something is either associated with status or it is not…

    Association is not causation.

    Women seek high status males because being attached to high status males causes high status for them. It is a sufficient and necessary condition to improve a woman’s status. This is why women dream of marrying princes because it automatically makes them a princess.

    Men do not seek attractive women for anything other than sex. Having a hot girlfriend can not possibly cause my status to change. Men would never marry a queen for the purposes of becoming a king… because it just doesn’t work like that.

  81. Do you see the method behind the madness of shaming-down apex Men in order to better optimize Hypergamy for “lesser” SMV women?

    Yes.

    And..
    “So the question for the weekend is this, as a man, do you give any headspace at all to considering how your status might improve with other men if you’re seen with a hot woman?”

    No. I think for men it’s basically, “Wow, I would like to tap that!”, or, “Damn, body of a goddess face from hell….still tap it though!”, or, “Hell no!”

    It’s always whether we’d bang the girl first…everything else comes a distant last, and, as you said, is heavily influenced by the FI.

  82. re: twu wuv etc.

    It’s common knowledge around these parts that when women *think* a man is richer then they will report having better sexual experiences with him. Is the same true of all the other forms of nonphysical dominance too? The squealing and fainting at the Beatles makes me think so. So, given the centrality of sexuality to love etc, I’m certain that proxies for physical dominance work just fine in making a man more sexually attractive.

    In contrast, although I’m certain it can happen, I think that it is rare for proxies for a woman’s physical beauty to cause much sexual attraction.

  83. Kryptokate – SOME people have ambitious, social striving, power hungry, extroverted type personalities and tend to care A LOT about status symbols and that absolutely includes women.

    Some people have extra chromosomes. Some people are deaf mutes. Some people are materialists. Some people think pork is unclean. Some people….

    So what?

    By your logic Bill Gates loses status for his wife’s less than model appearance. So would Stephen King or Bill Clinton. But they won’t lose status amongst men because who they fuck doesn’t effect their core competences, income levels, or work product.

    If you want to see a man gain social status amongst men because of his woman then look at the man with the good, loyal, pleasant, demure, feminine, cheerful, obedient, supportive wife. If she’s all those things and a 6 or better that guy gets added respect, status, and even envy. But it won’t make him the top dog at work, or improve his ability to write code.

  84. Mike wrote:
    “I love being the center of attention, of love being envied. I love the respect that comes with having what every guy wants.”

    Actually, it draws disrespect from other men.

    As stringsofcoins said:
    “And when I see a man 1-2 points of SMV below his woman I think she’s cheating on him. Then if she’s hot enough I think about how I would run game on her when he walks away.”

  85. “as a man, do you give any headspace at all to considering how your status might improve with other men if you’re seen with a hot woman?”

    The dynamic is there, but it is not the motivation.

    “When you see a guy who’s physically an obvious 1-2 SMV degrees lower than the woman he’s with, do you think any better of him or do you presume the imbalance is due to some other external factor (such as wealth or fame)?”

    some other external factor such as wealth or fame

    “Do you see the method behind the madness of shaming-down apex Men in order to better optimize Hypergamy for “lesser” SMV women?”

    The article is crystal clear.

  86. So the question for the weekend is this, as a man, do you give any headspace at all to considering how your status might improve with other men if you’re seen with a hot woman?

    I have to admit that on some level yes. If I was married to someone like Joy Behar I might feel less secure at get-togethers. On some level it would be a hit.

    BTW since that last thread is dead here is my final chick rating.

    Hula Hoop girl’s body = HB8
    She is in great shape, I can’t go lower.

    Remi Lacroix + larger breasts = HB10
    I love that girl next door look.

  87. @jf12 – “Nonsense. You’re making a virtual argument with unconnected dots. A linguistically equivalent counterexample suffices to dispel your illusion.

    The heaviness of the load of gravel in the bed of your truck can’t decrease your speed unless the heaviness is linked to your speed.

    From this banality you pretend to conclude that gravel, or antigravel or something, is fuel.”

    I’m on the floor!!! I’m framing that! Supreme ownage….

    Just a thought…you’ll find strong clusters/associations/gatherings of women with high status men/husbands, e.g. WAGS etc…BUT, do you find clusters/associations/gatherings of men with high status/SMV/Hot women?

    Men don’t seek status, men are biologically wired to be attracted to and fuck women hot/not hot…status, i.e. the one KK is referring, is conferred more so by women, probably historically, and the FI’s increased influence.

Speak your mind

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s