Rise Above

I received this comment on my January 29, 2020 livestream of Rational Male 101:

I think Rollo is talking about an idea that I’ve read about before in Thomas Sowell’s famous book Conflict of Visions. One side of the spectrum says that humans are very animalistic despite their capability of rationalizing otherwise, and human nature must be constrained by laws and social processes (such as constraining hypergamy). The other side of the spectrum says that humans are entirely capable of overcoming their Darwinian natures through intentional decisionmaking and must be unconstrained in order to flourish. Everyone lies somewhere between the two. I assume most men here lean more toward a constrained vision.

Nature vs. Nurture is a constant theme in the Manosphere. Yes, it’s a constant theme throughout most natural sciences, but it’s a paradox that’s going to always pervade intersexual dynamics. And mostly because people’s belief sets are rooted more in one or the other. Personal responsibility versus biological determinism is an issue that defines what our perspectives are on a great many things; not just intersexual dynamics. This isn’t an issue of politics or even worldview. There are plenty of believers in our human capacity to rise above our personal circumstances and evolutionary dictates on both sides of the political spectrum. For every hardline Trad-Con espousing the virtues of the human spirit and freewill superseding our physical conditions there is a left-leaning humanist who’ll conveniently agree that humans aren’t beholden to what some inconvenient science says if it aligns with their belief set.

Most “old order” ideologies today are struggling with relevancy in what I called the age of “new order” thinking or our New Age of Enlightenment. This new order understanding is the result of the unprecedented deluge of information we now have access to in this millennium. Not only is it this new influx of data that’s challenging the old order ideologies, but also the accessibility to it that old order thinkers can no longer keep pace with.

The response to this influx of information requires us to parse it out like never before. In predictable human fashion most people will make a hard turn towards the old order dictates that used to be able to explain harsh truths to us adequately enough for us to move on to other things. Thus, we see the global Village return to an interest in old religions, shamanism, metaphysics and tribal superstitions (and a lot of Chick Crack) today. That’s not to say that some of these old order institutions never had merit. A lot of what new order data presents to us can be confirmed by old order beliefs and wisdom. What we used to take on faith can now be confirmed by new order information. But this is also problematic for old order believers. It’s never a comforting thought to be confronted with what you had thought was sublimely metaphysical actually being something that can, in fact, be quantified. Yes, your religion was correct about some things, but those things are no longer the magical articles of faith they once were.

But We’re Better Than That, Right?

The Nature vs. Nurture debate is really a polite proxy for the war between two perspectives – Determinism vs. Freewill. While questions of consciousness and personal philosophies are outside the scope of this blog, what is in scope is how these perspectives define the way we approach our understanding of innate mating strategies, long term relationships, forming families and raising children.

As I mentioned early, determinism feels wrong to both kinds of believers. When ever I debate the harsh realities of how Hypergamy works, not just for our species, but most of the animal kingdom, I’m invariably met with the question of whether or not Hypergamy is ‘Good or Evil’. There’s always a want to qualify what’s really a natural dynamic. Is a pack of wolves evil for bringing down a caribou to feed the pack in the dead of winter? It all depends on who you’re rooting for I guess.

The ‘sphere’s contemplating these scenarios are nothing new. Considering the moral implications of the uglier aspects of Hypergamy is just one easy example among many other naturalism vs. moralism dilemmas in Red Pill praxeology. Empiricists will explain the dynamic in the hope that knowing about it, and how it works, will lead to better predictive outcomes. Hypergamy works thusly X-Y-Z; now plan accordingly and build a better life upon that predictive model. Believers on the other hand will absorb this data and look for moral equivocation:

They believe that the goal of debate is to establish what is morally better, and what everyone should do. They argue about what is right.

The Believers vs. The Empiricists

On a recent video I did with Rich Cooper and Dr. Shawn Smith one point of debate was whether or not the idea of Hypergamy should be used as a “predictive framework” for understanding intersexual relationships. The topic of our discussion was the merits of Hypergamy in its expanded, robust, definition and whether it’s a reliable metric to compare people’s relationships (married and dating) against. As you might guess a lot of Red Pill awareness centers on Hypergamy; it’s why I continue to stress it even when my detractors lie about my interests. It’s really that important.

But as we we’re debating the ins and outs I posed another question to Dr. Smith, “If Hypergamy is not a reliable predictive framework for understanding intersexual relationships, then what is a better one?”

I wasn’t being facetious, nor was I trying to hit Shawn with a gotcha question; I genuinely wrote this question down in my preparatory notes for the show. If not Hypergamy, in its expanded definition, (that describes women’s innate mating strategy) then what is a good outline by which we might judge women’s (and men’s) motives, incentives and behaviors with respect to their mating strategies.

Do women even have mating strategies defined by their innate, evolved, natures? Or are their sexual, reproductive decisions purely an act of cognitive will, as defined by their socialization? If 100,000 years of human evolution didn’t shape women’s reproductive strategies, then what are we left with that explains the commonalities we see women using (with our new order data gathering) in their mate selection and breeding (or aborting) habits? Is it entirely freewill and personal choice? We’re certainly meant to believe it’s “her body, her choice” and the decisions are an extension of her cognitive will.

Yes, I get that it doesn’t have to be one or the other. The possibility exists that it’s both nature and nurture affecting women and men’s mating strategies – and certainly choice is involved in the outcome of those strategies. I’m more inclined to believe it’s both, or at least we want to believe our conscious decisions are what’s pulling the strings. I’ve been in all the livestream debates when we asked the question, “Do women have agency?” and if not then are we our Sister’s Keeper? The more moralistic a guy is usually the more he’s likely he is to include women’s lives to his list of masculine duties and personal responsibilities.

The underlying assumptions in all these accounts is “Aren’t we better than this?”

As reasonably rational, self-aware creatures, with what we presume is freewill and a liability of personal responsibility for the choices we make when exercising that freewill, then haven’t we evolved above all our base impulse? If not, then shouldn’t we have by now?

Every day I harp on about the fallacy of the Blank Slate that most old order thinkers can’t seem to disabuse themselves, but if we are in fact “above it all” then the fallacy of the Blank Slate, as well as the notion that we might ever be influenced by our evolved natures is all a moot point. If our conscious selves are in fact better than our evolved natures then the variables of evolution are rendered meaningless. All that matters is the self and developing our consciousness to rise above our conditions.

Our conscious minds are capable of overriding our innate natures. We can, sometimes do, kill ourselves by not eating. A fast or a hunger strike is something we can consciously do as an act of will. A sense of righteousness and virtue can get mixed into that conscious and our will supersedes our innate nature (we get hungry and need to eat or we die). It doesn’t change the operative physical state that our bodies need certain things. We often commit suicide as an act of will or the conscious act of our depressive emotional state. Again, will (however it’s defined) overrides our physical conditions, but how much of what we believe is our willpower is uninfluenced by the same physical conditions, environment, upbringing, socialization and personal circumstance that we hope to rise above?

Very soon, perhaps within my own lifetime, we will be able to genetically engineer humans. In 2018 a Chinese scientist broke codes of ethics to create the first gene-edited baby. The science, if not the technology, is already here. The possibility exists that human beings, through sheer force of will, can custom engineer our physical states to conform to what our ideologies would tell us is preferable. If you’ve ever seen the movie Gattaca you’ll understand the implications of this technology. It’s this author’s opinion that we are living in a time when the ideologies we subscribe to today will affect the ethics of what we engineer into the humanity of tomorrow.

Gattaca is science fiction, but the philosophical questions it poses are very real now. From a objective, humanist perspective this raises a lot of interesting questions. Should we engineer-out of humanity “diseases” like Down’s Syndrome? What about sickle cell anemia? If a gay gene is ever discovered (I don’t believe homosexuality is genetic), should we edit it out of humanity to ensure “normal” heterosexual human beings in future generations?

The Chinese scientist who broke the rules of ethics was reprimanded for his experimentation. “When the news broke, peers in China and abroad condemned him for manipulating life’s building blocks using a relatively untested gene-editing tool.” But why? Chinese official declared his experimentation illegal. It’s entirely possible that a new race of superior humans could be engineered to be better ‘adapted’ to live longer, be smarter, more immune to certain diseases, possibly eradicate some disease and make for a stronger human species. Why would it be wrong or unethical to strive for “perfection”?

Have we not elevated our will above our physical limitations? Or are we using our physical conditions as an implement of our will? We’ll find out soon, but our ideological bent and the ideas of what right and wrong is most certainly influenced and defined by the realities of our physical selves.

Rise of the New Order

This was a comment from Jack about the rise of the New Order:

Rollo, the digital age has ruined us. Culture and pop culture today move at an alarming rate, what was hip now won’t be in the next year or month, society has never moved this fast and as a result the new way is merely a day away from being the old way. The demon’s out of the ring now, no turning back, and there’s no real way to deal with the modern age.

If you are not born into greatness, or utilizing the vast knowledge of the net to surpass everyone and stay there, you get nothing. It’s now the same way with women, previously, our worlds were smaller and hypergamy wasn’t as out of control. There were checks and balances, God and church being two of them, shame was a motivator for keeping women in check as they don’t understand loyalty like men. Now, they have infinite access to all top men, with upwards access to all jobs, and no reprecussions for acting in their very best interests and base instincts at all times. This shrinks the dating pool dramatically to only a few desirable mates because they value themselves so highly. So, if you’re not a natural at flirting with women, or learned how to do it through you and the many other “red pill” men out there AND CAN KEEP THAT ON 24/7 WHILE DOING IT BETTER THAN EVERYBODY ELSE, you will get nothing or lose what you have.

It’s almost all risk no reward for modern men unless you’re alpha”, and even then you’re not safe. Women will always want more and better, so if you’re not constantly 100% on at all times, you lose. If Jeff Bezos and Johnny Depp aren’t safe despite their fame and fortune, what does that say for everybody else? It’s exasperating as a modern man, you have to be and do too much to compete on the global market, as a man younger than you I don’t know if you can understand how daunting it is to have to be everything all at once and it STILL not being enough. You can’t even stay established anymore, if you’re not constantly putting out content, you fall to nothing again and have to start from scratch.

Your competition as a red pilled man, are other men armed with this knowledge, and it will get harder as time goes on with more men are forced to adapt this way of thinking or give up entirely. The new system forces you to constantly adapt faster, and better than all of your peers, or die instantly. There is no rest, no reprieve, no time to catch your breath, either you constantly innovate and improve on the new or you simply don’t eat. I cannot understand how this can keep up when this new “enlightened” era leaves the majority of the male sex in the dumpster.

That being said, without men such as you or Dalrock, established constant fonts of content for this, the kind of thing men need to hear, there will be no direction for men in the coming years. Yes, someone might come along eventually to replace you and the groups you represent, the thought even, but the men like you are very much buoys and lighthouses to keep those of us drifting in the digital age’s ocean from sinking. Without that, we’re all absolutely lost. Without guys like you, it’ll be even harder to aggregate that information and even try to compete or establish relevance. So the destruction of Dalrock’s work means setting those of us who wish to live and fight for a better life back several years, which none of us can afford. Many of us have learned partly, or greatly from you and men like you, whether that’s connecting the dots or having the entire mind opened. So wether or not he wants to delete everything, his work must press on for every one of us who wants a chance to survive in this.

While I’m flattered to be considered one of the pioneers of understanding intersexual dynamics from Red Pill perspective, I can entirely relate with the sentiment of perpetual vigilance. “If [insert male celebrity] can’t make it in today’s sexual marketplace with today’s women then what hope does the average guy have?” is a common MGTOW refrain. I understand men’s desire to just throw in the towel and accept one’s sexless fate. We now live in a Global Sexual Marketplace. The old order rules for the localized sexual marketplace that the last 3 generations of men still expect to work for them today are a thing of the past. And this is only one symptom of the rapid expansion of technology and its effect on our cultural narratives.

For all the alarms we’d like to raise about humans’ genetically engineering future generations of humans, the effects of the meta-scale social engineering experiment that is gynocentrism are already here. Men have always formed adaptations to the realities of solving their reproductive problems, but never have a generation of men had to adapt to so rapidly a changing environment. And it’s only going to get more complex as we move forward.

Today’s men have few options available to them in our present state. Most of us will continue to keep pace and attempt to see the signs of ways to best advantage what comes at us in the sexual marketplace, and really life in general, until we can no longer keep up. Evolve or die. Keep pace with the trends and stay sharp enough to look ahead and leverage what you can based on an objective assessment of what human beings really are. Stay sharp until you no longer can. Hopefully, if you’ve wisely conserved and protected your resources during that time you’ll have some security until you die. If not, then you can expect to fall prey to the next generation of vultures who see your nest egg as their source of revenue.

Or you can give up. You can do just what’s necessary to survive in a system that passed you by and console yourself with complaining about how degenerate and unfair it is. And you’ll be right on both counts because that’s where you are. Old order thinking is very comforting, and it will be until there are no more old order thinkers – replaced by a succeeding generation of new order thinkers who themselves will be swept aside by new order thinkers.

More and more we’re going to see a return to the old order religions, metaphysics and tribalism as the generations that cannot keep pace with human advancement seek meaning and consolation. As a result we’ll also see a new virtue signaling and ego-investments in the power of the self, freewill and mindful consciousness. The Trad-Cons of today are already here and the more ‘spiritual-but-not-religious’ social justice adherents apply their own brand of magical thinking, but for the same reasons. The effect is the same – the retreat from competing in a globalizing system that, sooner or later, will outpace us all.

And like all other aspects of this rapid advancement, even this retreating demographic will be coopted and commercialized by savvy ‘players’ who are still keeping pace. Formalizing the retreaters, organizing them, catering to their idiosyncrasies, all will be big business for those who learn to sell consolation (if not hope) to those who think they’ll never keep up.

Published by Rollo Tomassi

Author of The Rational Male and The Rational Male, Preventive Medicine

Leave a Reply

  Subscribe  
Notify of
SJF
Guest
SJF
Offline

*”And remember, you can’t legislate good behaviors. The sexes do have evolved behaviors. Even history points to that ( not social media ). One can see.clearly how we got to where we are….in the west, and how western influences are spread across the globe.”* @Blaximus Your cognitive dissonance is strong here. My back and forth with you was predicated on the fact that my community plays well together. And I’ve stated my pre-suppositions over and over and over. My premise is that I have lived in communities all my fucking life that have legislated good behaviors. Childhood, high school, college,… Read more »

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline

I get what you mean. You think you can just isolate yourself from the country you live in somehow. And you can for a while. But still, you need to realistically see the writing on the wall, and the patterns . If for no other reason than to have an honest and realistic understanding. Short of a.meteor hitting the planet, decline happens slowly, and it happens completely when people are distracted and lulled into a false sense of security. You.can dismantle the constitution, and ardent patriots will cheer. Law. Or, they will ignore it and think they are just fine.… Read more »

IAS
Guest
IAS
Offline

@Disgruntled: I think you are referring to an instance when Sentient wrote about roasting strip loin, which he sometimes has for breakfast.

Sentient
Guest
Sentient
Offline

Disgruntled

https://www.foodnetwork.com/recipes/roasted-new-york-strip-steak-with-port-wine-mustard-sauce-recipe-1942050

Use a probe thermometer and you can’t mess it up.

But I don’t eat this for breakfast… 🐯

Sentient
Guest
Sentient
Offline

https://thewirecutter.com/reviews/best-probe-thermometer/

Brown it. Stick it with the probe. Set temp. In oven till it goes off. Take it out. Rest it 10 minutes.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

@Disgruntled Depends on the meat, but roasting a multi-pound piece of meat can be as easy as turning an oven on and putting it in. I’ve roasted ham on a cookie sheet with extra aluminum foil underneath. What you do to roast beef depends on how rare you like it. Roasting chicken or turkey takes a little more prep but it’s still pretty easy. Ditto leg of lamb. It can be as simple or complex as you want it to be. I still remember the day when I calculated the price per pound of lunch meat, and realized that it… Read more »

kfg
Guest
kfg
Offline

That one and James Beard’s Theory and Practice. Buy by the bag or case (4 bags). Wholesale suppliers will often sell over the counter in bag quantities. Set a freezer to 36F and it will keep for a couple of months.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Too many millennials are into watching Chopped or some other Food Network show while ordering from GrubHub, DoorDash, etc. Cognitive dissonance? The ability to create any edible thing from scratch is now a DHV of some weight. Extra points if it’s meat. Even bacon, the infamous “gateway meat”.

James
Guest
James
Offline

Rollo, Re commenter Jack’s opinion: First of all, he’s not ENTIRELY wrong about the state of technology re culture. Where i think he has that point incomplete is that we are in the literal teen-aged years of the information age; its adolescence. As with ANYTHING that has an impact on culture, there are developmental stages. And, analogous to human development, the adolescence are a tumultuous time where things go whacky just simply because they can: any stimulant causes a wild swing to both extremes of spectrum, and its because it, the system, has not yet learned out to self-regulate. Ask… Read more »

theasdgamer
Guest

“I ask my fellow home owners of they own their homes and property, and every one of them say ” yes “. Own it. Mine. Asset. Stop paying taxes.” I’ve been saying that for decades. You can buy and own a car, but you can’t buy and own land without a special contract with the govt. Hypothetically, you could pay them enough taxes forward so that they will put a special dispensation on your land so the land’s owner doesn’t pay property or other taxes. But they could always add new taxes and fees and screw your descendants that way.… Read more »

theasdgamer
Guest

“But your kids and grandkids are going to have a different life, forcing a different outlook than yours.”

I’m teaching Daughter Gamer to have a go bag. Then a “go trailer” like in The Accountant. Money, arms, contacts, a hydrofoil boat on a home on the ocean.

Sentient
Guest
Sentient
Offline

You can buy and own a car, but you can’t buy and own land without a special contract with the govt.*

You just can’t drive it on public roads unless you pay registration and insurance…

redpillrabbi
Guest

This is rich:
https://nypost.com/2020/02/24/half-of-women-say-their-sex-life-is-distressing-study-finds/
“The most common female sexual dysfunction, Davis found, was low sexual self-image, with arousal-related dysfunctions, desire, orgasm and responsiveness also quite frequent. Weight, relationship status and breastfeeding were often associated factors, but far more serious circumstances were those of antidepressant use. Birth control, on the other hand, was found to have no impact.”

Study from Australia, USA probably has similar rates. The bed that you make, that’s the one you lie in…

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline

” I’m teaching Daughter Gamer to have a go bag. Then a “go trailer” like in The Accountant. Money, arms, contacts, a hydrofoil boat on a home on the ocean. “

I always love these Mad Max fantasies.

A go bag won’t help you in a total Weimar republic style collapse. You missed my point 100%.

Besides, most people can’t use a firearm even if they had one, and a majority will get a few bullets when they run across someone that does know how to use one.

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline

Rpr

https://nypost.com/2020/02/24/half-of-women-say-their-sex-life-is-distressing-study-finds/

I think the study is on point. I’ve been with several women that ” thought ” they had sexual issues/dysfunction ( lack of ability to orgasm being the most common ).

Lol, I overhear discussions, candid ones, my wife and her friends have with young(er) women that complain about their sex lives and lack of orgasms and emotional connection, so imo there’s something going on with women’s perceptions concerning sex.

kfg
Guest
kfg
Offline

“A go bag won’t help you in a total Weimar republic style collapse.”

I keep a go bag, but I understand that the most likely cause of bugging out is flood or fire and the most likely destination the Holiday Inn a 10 minute jog uphill and across the fire break.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

RedPillRabbi quotes the NY Post: Weight, relationship status and breastfeeding were often associated factors, but far more serious circumstances were those of antidepressant use. This keeps being “discovered” over and over again. It wasn’t a secret 20 years ago. SSRI’s and other little helpers commonly handed out by the shrinks candy counter have defined, obvious side effects. But somehow that keeps getting flushed down the memory hole, then a few years later it’s [gasp!] a brand new discovery all over again. It’s like “Wow, we found out that drinking coffee right before bed keeps people awake who knew? Who ever… Read more »

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

kfg
I keep a go bag, but I understand that the most likely cause of bugging out is flood or fire and the most likely destination the Holiday Inn a 10 minute jog uphill and across the fire break.

What if there’s a Cheesecake Factory parking lot closer? Huh? What then?

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline

😂

theasdgamer
Guest

“A go bag won’t help you in a total Weimar republic style collapse. You missed my point 100%”

Of course, a go bag won’t help you go somewhere better.

I like you and you’re a nice guy, but….

theasdgamer
Guest

Blax, the Weimar Republic never collapsed. The currency inflated astronomically, so that wiped out the savings of the average german who didn’t have foreign bank accts. There was no cash flow problem for most people. And stocks inflated in price along with the currency. Wallets were replaced by carts to carry the cash. And since collapses are typically slow, you typically have some time to adjust your assets. You want some hard assets in your go bag and you want to diversify your assets so that a currency crash doesn’t wipe you out. You have to think about the various… Read more »

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus
Offline

“The currency inflated astronomically….”

So if you have 50,000$ in ” the bank “, and suddenly pork chops cost 7500$ a pound and gas is 650$ a gallon, that’s not a collapse?

Well, okay, if 90% of your population are millionaires and billionaires it could be an inconvenience. And sure, most people should have money in foreign bank accounts…sure…lol. The govt is fine with that for average citizens.

Sentient
Guest
Sentient
Offline

ASD in full LARP mode.

How many languages does he speak? Read/Write?

fake passports

LMAO

%d bloggers like this: