This morning I was made aware of another example of open Hypergamy. A Russian Alpha Widow admitted to her duplicity in switching her Beta husband’s sperm with that of her ex lover’s in her IVF insemination. Now, at the risk of throwing red meat to the wolves here, I wanted to dissect this situation a bit to explain a larger concept I’ve been considering lately. It would be enough to use this situation as one more example of women’s prime directive – Hypergamy before all else – but, there’s more involved here that illustrates the sociological reach that Hypergamy has for women.
You see, Yana Anokhina, 38, couldn’t have pulled off her deception of Maxim Anokhin without enlisting the aid of Dr. Liya Kazaryan and her staff in swapping out his sperm for that of Yana’s former lover; the Alpha for whom she was ‘widowed’. I’m not entirely sure that her former lover (now her current relationship) was aware of the swap, but there’s no question about Yana’s motives.
Ms Anokhina has not spoken about the swap but reports say she wanted the father of her baby to be the man she loved – not her husband.
‘It was found out during the investigation in court that Maxim’s wife Yana was the one who initiated the process of replacing her husband’s biological material,’ reported Vesti.
‘Allegedly, she wanted to give birth to a child by a man with whom she was in love, and her husband was the one who paid the costs.’
So this isn’t just as simple as she got knocked up by her Alpha lover and tricked her Beta husband into believing the inseminated sperm was his own. She had to actually go to the trouble of collecting two samples of sperm, convincing the IVF clinic’s doctor and staff into making the swap (and then withholding the truth from the father) and then carrying the pregnancy to term and keeping her husband ignorant of the ruse for a year. This may seem like the deviousness of a particular woman, but remember, she had to enlist the confidence of Dr. Kazaryan and other clinicians (I presume also female).
And she does all this with a laugh.
I’ve written quite a bit on what I call the Sisterhood Über Alles and this is one more example of how that collective female consciousness intuitively understands and both consciously and unconsciously promotes the interests of the Feminine Imperative – even for unfamiliar, anonymous women.
Now you might say, “Well Rollo, this is just one horrible example of a few women who got in cahoots to deceive a hapless Beta chump. Not all women are like this.” Or I’m sure the more morally conscious of ‘red pill women’ would simply point out that they would never do such a thing and convince us that ‘quality women’ regularly police their own Hypergamous impulses – these Russian women just lack their moral superiority. Well, be that as it may, it’s not too difficult to find online forums dedicated to women collaborating with other women in order to trick a man into marrying a woman via false pregnancy claims. In fact there’s a lucrative black market for positive pregnancy tests sold to women wanting to press their boyfriends into a marriage commitment by way of a false-positive pregnancy scare.
The fact behind all this still remains – women evolved for a subconscious, collective duplicity when it comes to optimizing on Hypergamy.
We can see this in popular culture; a culture defined by the Feminine Imperative now. Dalrock once said we have replaced the monogamous marriage model of child rearing with the child support model of child rearing today. I believe he’s right, but how is that child support model effected today and how doe it align with women’s evolved, instinctual predilections?
Humankind evolved from small tribal collectives, but in each collective there were commonalities of behaviors that developed similarly to solve various personal and collective (tribal) problems. For instance, an instinctive (unlearned) fear of snakes or spiders in women is an evolved part of humankind’s collective mental firmware. A small boys natural propensity to throw an object with strength and accuracy might be another example.
How women interact today in what I call the Sisterhood is a gestalt of the various instinctive behaviors that the women of our tribal ancestors developed to aid them in collective support as well as ensuring long-term security in reproduction. In other words, women evolved to do exactly what Dr. Kazaryan did, and so many other women in various “trick him into marrying you” forums do, to enable another woman’s sexual strategy. From an evolutionary perspective it follows that women who aided their ‘sisters’ in Hypergamy would themselves be aided and insure that this archetypal behavior became a characteristic of women’s collectivist nature.
I once watched a video of some daytime women’s talk show that centered on how women could justifiably trap a man into commitment by essentially lying to him about a faked pregnancy. I apologize for not having a link to it here, but while I was looking for it on YouTube I was inundated with videos of shows on this topic – I literally couldn’t find the one I was thinking of because there were so many returns. Watching this show I was hit by just how many women in the audience rallied behind the women doing the ‘trapping’ and the myriad justifications offered to allay any feelings of guilt, remorse or doubts about having a child.
This is particularly emphasized if the ‘father’ in question fulfills an ideal of women’s collective Hypergamy. To the collective hivemind of women, a woman is, by nature, entitled to a child with the most perfect father (high SMV) she can attract. Remember, shows and online forums like this are only small representative examples of that global Hypergamous archetypal expectation and the support women offer each other to optimize Hypergamy. I’ve stated before the the Sisterhood Über Alles (above all) transcends all considerations of tribe, race, religion and even political stripe. All women are part of ‘team woman‘ before any other affiliation; this is how the Feminine Imperative has remained a social influence since our hunter/gatherer beginnings. As we’ve progressed from small tribalist beginnings to larger collectives, to nations and now to globalism, this female collectivism has expanded to encompass the totality of womankind.
Love Me Vampire, Fuck Me Werewolf
Anyone who’s been reading my work for a while is probably scratching their heads as to why I’m referring to the concept of ‘archetypes’ here. As most of my readers know, I’ve never been a fan of Carl Jung. I’ve written about why this is a few times and I’ll probably write a more comprehensive essay about it in the coming year, but suffice to say that while Jung might be synonymous with the new agey metaphysical concept of archetypes, it was from anthropology that he lifted the term and that’s the basic reference I’m using here. That said, I don’t necessarily disagree with Jungian archetypes, it’s at the point where the concept takes on metaphysical aspects that I part ways with them.
However, the idea of archetypes is necessary to explain the last bit of the puzzle here, because it’s my belief that a primordial understanding of Hypergamy is part of our collective consciousness and unconsciousness. I say collective consciousness because since the time of the Sexual Revolution our global understanding of intersexual dynamics has become part of our social discourse. When I refer to something like Open Hypergamy I’m talking about the almost triumphant, open embrace of women’s sexual strategy. The generations that came after the Sexual Revolution scarcely remember that there was a time when intersexual truths we take for granted now weren’t something that was discussed in polite conversation. Hypergamy, while unconsciously understood, was secretive. A woman who other women called a ‘gold digger’ was disparaged by women not on moral grounds, but rather because she was open about the sexual strategy all women employ and they’d rather be kept secret so as to use it effectively.
In 2018 it’s almost quaint to think that women would be coy about Hypergamy. With the advent of the internet it became impossible for women to keep Hypergamy concealed, and really, why would they care to in an age when the necessary provisioning-side of Hypergamy is veritably insured? But it wasn’t always so obvious. Up until the mid 1960s the understanding of Hypergamy was an unconscious knowledge. Certainly it was discussed and written about by men contemplating the duplicitous nature of women. Ancient religious texts are rife with proverbs warning against the nature of women, so the basics of Hypergamy were something our tribal ancestors we’re well aware of.
I received this Tweet from a reader a few days ago:
@RationalMale I drew these years ago, and thanks to you, I now understand the language behind my intention! #hypergamy #redpill pic.twitter.com/Ceen0Xrj7O
— 🌵 Mad Acrylic 🖌 (@madacrylic) September 3, 2018
This guy’s ‘revelation’ prompted me to consider the primordial understanding we have of Hypergamy. I’ve read dozens of articles by, and listened to dozens more interviews of, ‘popular psychologists’ who explain the commonalities of our classic human stories and myths. I got into this topic in Storytelling. The basic premise is that our common evolution has led to common themes in all human stories. The same elements and the same character archetypes pursue the same motives from culture to culture. Yet all of these commonalities are centered on similar aspects of our evolved mental firmware. The hero, the villain, good vs. evil, the wise old sage, the beautiful damsel to be saved, ect. are all founded on common human development. They are semi-conscious expressions of what our evolution has embedded in our mental firmware.
Now, what if I told you that the reality of women’s Hypergamous nature is also a part of that collective consciousness?
My theory is this: human beings have an innate understanding of the Alpha Seed – Beta Need nature of intersexual dynamics. On some level of consciousness we know, we feel, that it’s true, how it functions and why does. As a result, social institutions (religion and familial) created moral strictures around this unconscious knowledge to buffer against the worst effects of it on society. Only after the Sexual Revolution and men ceding virtually unilateral control of Hypergamy to women did these strictures change.
The concepts of men who represent Alpha Fucks and Beta Bucks are similarly part of this instinctual understanding of Hypergamy. These too are archetypes, but more so, they form the basis of more complex male archetypes (love me Vampire, fuck me Werewolf). They are the men women want to fuck and the men women want to be provided for by. And we can trace the root of these archetypes through our evolution and even the evolution of other primates. These Hypergamous archetypes then manifest themselves in our era-specific, cultural specific, stories, narratives, mythology, etc.
forgot to add: other than asking about solo traveling, I also ask girls if they have any tattoos (then I show them mine, and have a built-in routine for that). This girl obviously didn’t, but sluts are always eager to show you all them cool tats they got.
@blax
“her pussy was loose af. But god only knows what she’d been shoving in it.”
Lmao
Since we’re talking about women’s anatomy, don’t go for the silly meme that’s making its rounds that the clit is a vestigial version of the dick. The head and shaft of the clit can be seen, but 90% of the clit is unseen. It wraps the external two to three inches of the vaj and has wings that extend to the hip joints.
The clit actually grows until it reaches its max size in a woman’s 30’s.
Red Bull gives you wings too.
Rules and mental heath
https://anchor.fm/drbabe/episodes/012–Goldmunds-Secrets-to-Seduction-e20to4
Red Bull gives you wings too.
Red wings?
When it comes to bull, nobody can do it like Blax….
zucchini? cucumbers?
Women have hemorrhaged to death from using plants for dildos.
Bedposts…..
asd
so, why don’t more women hemorrhage to death from childbirth?
https://www.elitedaily.com/life/science-vagina-women-dont-get-looser-sex/964710
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/all-about-sex/201109/the-rare-truth-about-tight-and-loose-women
https://www.healthline.com/health/womens-health/loose-vagina
Aight then. Enough vag talk from me.
nurses?
I said bedposts, not bedpans.
Timestamp = 6:17 pm.
there was a young lass from mobile
whose ass was made of blue steel
she got her thrills from pneumatic drills
and off-centered emory wheels
Domination and submissiveness leadership and being lead.
https://www.crisismagazine.com/2016/traumatic-foundation-male-homosexuality
A good read
Rugby WTF? Use your fucking words. It was not a good read. Self destruction is not self-improvement. I had a funner time as an autopsy assistant in med-school at the county coroner’s dissecting five dead people every other weekend in 1985. Gross stuff and all. You have to not wallow in pathology. Anti-Fragility is about low downside and high upside. It’s not about understanding fucked up things. Just after that, I think my first three months of clinical rotations were in Internal Medicine. The absolute very first patient I had to “work up” and do a physical exam on mysteriously… Read more »
https://youtu.be/YV3CQIAfhX0
https://youtu.be/qofdWFv7m0U
Rugby just needs to get a doll…as Turd Flinging Monkey would say.
@Rugby. I’m calling for an Internet Time-put.
We talked about the spamming many times. Get off this blog for a while and get into the real world.
Posting randomly doesn’t contribute to the discussion. I’ve said this many time: get your own blog. Challenge, argue, question or offer insights but don’t use this platform because a random thought popped into your head that has nothing to do with the original post.
@ Rugby: You posted the link “The Traumatic Foundation of Male Homosexuality” and called it as a “good read”. I do not deny you the right to post links to articles you find of interest. But, I would urge you to also state you thoughts on it, what you learnt from it, and bonus points if it fits in with the theme of the Original Post under which we are commenting. I read the above article, and to me, yes it was a good read. I am reading Freud at the moment and such articles help me better understand Psychoanalytic… Read more »
https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/1039479687339225088?s=19
Incubus Rising…. stop enabling him…it only encourages him to continue instead having him get better–in every sense of that word.
Ah not here to stir anything up. I though its interesting seeming life and death the way SJF was from the body to the mind. Been traveling a lot and it’s great to see people who are overall happy in a complimentary relationship. I stumble across something I though at the time was a point of view I’m not familiar with. Getting stuck in a box mentally is uncomfortable. Doing some work down in Florida and was staying at the airport hearing different people talk about different points of view of life. Walking by every book store the romance section… Read more »
Incubus_Rising
September 12, 2018 at 5:59 am
“I am reading Freud at the moment and such articles help me better understand Psychoanalytic Psychology.”
FYI,
Yesterday I clicked on a pingback in the About section of TRM. I was a red pill oriented blog by a psychoanalyst. He was commenting on Rollo’s stuff from a Freudian psychoanalytic perspective.
Thought you might be interested:
http://adamayala.org/category/why-psychoanalysis-is-better-than-therapy/
http://adamayala.org/dr-jordan-peterson-has-this-wrong-psychoanalyst-dont-change-your-memories/
http://adamayala.org/psychoanalysis-creating-ethical-monsters-from-the-depths-of-your-personal-hell/
rugby11
Walking by every book store the romance section dominates with fantasy. So what was intriguing was why dies this stuff keep getting produced?
Because women buy it. Supply and demand. Econ 101, red pill 101. You already know this. If you want more details, search http://www.bookfinder.com for a copy of “My Secret Garden” by Nancy Friday.
Stop living in your head so much.
Rugby
Getting stuck in a box mentally is uncomfortable.
Use that discomfort to get out of the box. Your “I’m stuck” is a buffer.
@SJF:
I will read the articles. And the blog appears interesting. Thanks for the links.
Hello,
I live in Muslim Country, Bangladesh. It’s a half-term society here. Yes you can have relationship with a girl, but you’ve to be monogamous. But I want casual relationships and no attachment to girls anything other than sex. First of all, from core biology, does enthusiastic sex exist in which women only seek seeds other than security, provisioning? How do I get out of her provisioning sights?
Freud and Lacan have attracted the ire of feminists for decades.
“Freud was a man of his times. He was opposed to the women’s emancipation movement and believed that women’s lives were dominated by their sexual reproductive functions.”
“The great question that has never been answered, and which I have not yet been able to answer, despite my thirty years of research into the feminine soul, is ‘What does a woman want?'” Freud once mused in “Sigmund Freud: Life and Work” by Ernest Jones.
LOL…100 years later Rollo and the manosphere have finally answered that question.
https://www.verywellmind.com/how-sigmund-freud-viewed-women-2795859
@Orson: Thanks for the link to the article. The opening paragraph had me in splits: “Women oppose change, receive passively, and add nothing of their own”. Hmm, not much has changed since the 1920’s then. In my opinion he was a genius and there has been a deliberate attempt by the FI to dismiss his theories as outdated, sexist, misogynist … blah … blah. In the words of his own grand daughter: “Sophie Freud, described his theories as outdated. “His ideas grew out of society. He mirrored in his theories the belief that women were secondary and were not the… Read more »
@Incubus_Rising you welcome! To those of you curious enough to find traces of the Red Pill beyond the conventional sources I would suggest the work of Jean Baudrillard. He has been on a collision course with feminism and has been called the “pimp of postmodernism”. Oddly enough The Matrix trilogy was inspired by his book “Simulacra and Simulation”. His views converge a lot with Rollo’s take on polarity of the sexes being the foundation of a healthy relationship. “In “The Destiny of the Sexes and the Decline of Sexual Illusion” Jean Baudrillard at once mourns the loss of the shimmering… Read more »
Incubus on Freud In my opinion he was a genius and there has been a deliberate attempt by the FI to dismiss his theories as outdated, sexist, misogynist … blah … blah. More like a neurotic who projected his own issues onto other men. The first time a psych-major girl earnestly explained the whole Oedipus complex to me I was astounded that anything so bizarre and dumb could be taught in a college. Since then I’ve learned there’s a wide range of bizarre and dumb stuff in colleges, but that’s not relevant. Freud’s crank theories grew out of his work… Read more »
well then…
https://www.fox4now.com/news/national/nancy-crampton-brophy-how-to-murder-your-husband-arrested
https://infogalactic.com/info/Jean_Baudrillard
Post modernist, post structuralist, “end of history” type professor.
Lots and lots and lots of words, I’m sure…
“[French theorists] gave Americans a language they did not need,” Baudrillard responds when asked about the prevalence of French theory in American academia.
@Anonymous Reader
Baudrillard is way more red pill than academics like Jordan “trad-con purple piller” Peterson.
@AR: I do not have the time or the intention to type essays justifying Freud’s theories. I have been reading all his theories and to me it makes perfect sense. His theory of psychosexual development, which takes place during the phallic stage (around ages 3 to 5 years) in boys and girls is an essential stage where the child finds his / her “identity”. And when there is an interruption in the normal identification process, the child grows up to have a number of psychological issues. Why do you think “the Village” wants to indoctrinate 4 year olds about “sex… Read more »
” . . . Baudrillard . . .”
Oy.
Another example of “interruption in the normal identification process”:
Sally Field and her car crash of a life. She is coming out with her new book in which she throws Burt Reynolds under the bus. Dead men don’t speak.
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment/celebrity/sally-field-talks-about-her-life-%e2%80%98in-pieces%e2%80%99/ar-BBNawbt?li=BBoPWjQ&ocid=iehp
Rollo
#MeToo silent on this…
https://wjla.com/features/7-on-your-side/caught-on-tape-teacher-sexually-assaulted-inside-dc-charter-school
Sentient
(Brophy)
well then…
Now there’s an archetypal woman.
Orson
Baudrillard is way more red pill than academics like Jordan “trad-con purple piller” Peterson.
So?
That’s a very low bar to hurdle. You must be new around here.
Incubus Rising I have been reading all his theories and to me it makes perfect sense. Including the whole Oedepus complex? That makes sense to you as an inevitable part of male maturation? His theory of psychosexual development, which takes place during the phallic stage (around ages 3 to 5 years) in boys and girls is an essential stage where the child finds his / her “identity”. Correlation is not causation. Lots of other theories of human development have noted the importance of those years in child mental and emotional development [1], most of them don’t involve any special interest… Read more »
@Sentient #Metoo is dying just like BLM is fading in public consciousness because it’s an movement that’s over-stepped its original function.
For #Metoo it’s a convenient platform to seize power, control the narrative, get free stuff.
The allegations against Anthony Bourdain’s slag have gone silent but we’re still talking about Weinstein…
I see Rollo shared bad ass French actor, Vincent Cassel’s IG on twitter. After googling some pics of him and his former wife Monica Bellucci (one of those rare women to age well into her 50s) I stumbled upon this red pill quote of his:
“Women like security. Men prefer adventure”
@Sentient
Clearly, Ms. Barbee was a rat and a troublemaker and deserved to be punished for ratting out one of the mothers of her students. She was pushing her white privilege. :\
@AR: There was no frivorce industry in the 1920s, yet he was right about women with daddy issues.
And yes, to me, oedpus complex, casteration anxiety and penis envy are concepts that make complete sense.
If these concepts don’t make sense to you can you cite any other source or study which explains the psychosexual development in humans?
And yes, to me, oedpus complex, casteration anxiety and penis envy are concepts that make complete sense.
Cool. Please explain the Oedipus complex.
incubux
For #Metoo it’s a convenient platform to seize power, control the narrative, get free stuff.
That’s a succinct summary of what many men have said about PoundMeToo from the start. It’s the same old same old – hypergamy plus entitlement plus intra-female competition (“those young sluts!”) plus Team Woman vs. socially incompetent (“creepy”) Betas…
Although #SheToo may have had more of an effect than one might have expected. If so, good.
@Sentient: So Ms.Santora grabbed Ms.Garbee’s booby. I don’t know what the fuss is about, it was a “Muffins for Mums” event after all.
@AR: Go read “Interpretation of Dreams” by Freud. It is 400 plus pages. Can’t type all that here in the comments section.
Again, please cite any alternate study of psychosexual development in humans.
Wala Quickly, BLK is/was a creation of the media and feminists. It didn’t ” represent ” anything really except a convenient boogey man taking advantage of media driven publicity. I.spoke to a group about the blm hype and hysteria, and instructed them to ” Google ” the name and watch the fuckery unfold. You’d think blm was a legit thing representing millions, but that’s always been far from the truth. Most makes in my group correctly identified bom as a feminist group/creation. They have been dead, but the net and media keeps trying to breathe life in the corpse. This,… Read more »
Most makes in my group correctly identified bom as a feminist group/creation.
Blax – equalist creation…
J
Cat banging hotter younger tighter Monica…
Photographer
No. And I know what I’m talking about because I’m not on the outside looking in. BLM is.a.feminist movement, full stop. Too bad, because the name had meaning, but that movement never had traction in the community. Guys figured it out in nanoseconds. Only weak women.followers got involved. A couple of summers ago, I was at a rally downtown. About 10,000 people.showed up almost organically. A few hours in, some chicks.wearing blm shirts showed up and bum rushed for every available microphone. It was all about publicity and a measure of notoriety. Somebody punched one of them in the face.… Read more »
incubus
@AR: Go read “Interpretation of Dreams” by Freud. It is 400 plus pages.
LOL. That’s like the Marxist who refused to discuss the Communist Manifesto until I had read all of Das Kapital. (Manifesto is a pamphlet and I queried him on a single point: “Labor battalions shall be formed”.)
If it is such an obvious and useful idea, should explaining Oedipus take 400 pages? Shucks, Jordan Peterson can expound on dreams about his grandma’s pubic hair in fewer words…
But thanks anyway.
Incubus_Rising “Go read “Interpretation of Dreams” by Freud. It is 400 plus pages.” What the hell is going on here? Freudian dream interpretation seems primordial. That is not to say that dream interpretation is not without supreme merit. Dreaming it out big time, I think, is the bomb. Sweating the Bed while going through an Accepting the Red Pill, in my opinion is the way to go. But, wasn’t Freud’s Interpretation of Dreams just a start? What did you find out about yourself and IT by reading his tome? What made the difference for you. Me and one of my… Read more »
@AR
Not so new as you in Freudian psychoanalysis.
I mentioned Peterson because like you he has been dismissive and biased towards continental thinkers.
Not so new as you in Freudian psychoanalysis.
I’m not good at Phlogystin-based combustion analysis either.
I mentioned Peterson because like you he has been dismissive and biased towards continental thinkers.
Was Viktor Frankl a “continental thinker”?
@Blax
Have you read Rev. Peterson’s book ‘The Antidote’?
https://carolynecashin.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/the-antidote-healing-america-from-the-poison-of-hate-blame-and-victimhood-by-jesse-lee-peterson.pdf
I found it insightful,to much sarcasm and little red pill, although he knows the enemy well.
OK. Here’s one for Rugby. (I’m self serving in offering this up. I had a great experience last night in a teleconference trying to help an acquaintance’s depressed son. It worked great. It turned out it stimulated the young guy to talk to his dad about self improving going forward. I sweated the details and was fucking nervous as hell prepping my mind before-hand–something I never do in real life. And the rest of the evening with me on my own in the cigar lounge turned out to be a peak experience talking to guys. Prior to the telconference, a… Read more »
“If a male human is put into the same situation, endowed with the same abilities (not necessarily same skill) as a male tiger, he will act the same as the male tiger.” Feminism will succeed if it goes how it’s going now, Roosh V’s books are banned from Amazon, from Barnes and Noble , from a Canadian Book Company, Patreon is Censoring Misogynists; Google, Twitter working hand in hand. The earth has already better evolved for feminists. Now only good looking, top performer men will get away (as they deserve it) with whatever they do. This dynamic first appeared to… Read more »
@Anonymous Reader and KFG: Here is the “reply” to the accusations by Wilkinson and husband (didn’t take husband name BTW, although that may have been for scientific name reasons…) https://math.uchicago.edu/~wilkinso/Statement.html https://www.math.uchicago.edu/~farb/statement I recall this from the original article: “So what in the world had happened at the Intelligencer? Unbeknownst to us, Amie Wilkinson, a senior professor of mathematics at the University of Chicago, had become aware of our paper and written to the journal to complain. A back-and-forth had ensued. Wilkinson then enlisted the support of her father—a psychometrician and statistician—who wrote to the Intelligencer at his daughter’s request to… Read more »
@AR: You have a problem with Freud without even reading his work.. And I don’t have time to spend hours explaining psychology to you. I read the “Communist Manifesto” about a year ago and I had many questions. I did not go out asking a Socialist or Communist to explain shit to me. I wanted to hear it form the horse’s mouth. I started reading “Capital” by Karl Marx. It is 1136 pages and I am at page 847. It has been a long read, and I do it is small bites every few days. It is an absolute pile… Read more »
Blax
“BLM is.a.feminist movement, full stop.”
Does that mean Soros is getting a refund?
Feminists are Equalist foot soldiers.
@Christians This is off-topic to anything in this thread, but you might find it interesting. I was curious about how the Bible saw adultery, suspecting that an equalist, FI-catering interpretation of “Thou shall not commit adultery.” Here’s what I found: Among the Hebrews, as in other Oriental nations, adultery was the act whereby any married man was exposed to the risk of having a spurious offspring imposed upon him. An adulterer was, therefore, any man who had illicit intercourse with a married or betrothed woman; and an adulteress was a betrothed or married woman who had intercourse with any other… Read more »
Did anyone ask Ugh why her ex husband doesnt have 50/50 custody w/ their child(ren)?
As a man embroiled in a 7 year war against the divorce industial complex junta, the comment that triggered me was that her ex gets “a liberal visitation schedule”.
I didnt read all the comments but im disappointed that the comments that i did read failed to take her to task on this issue.
@Incubus_Rising: If you read Darwin you learn what Darwin thought and you learn some history. You don’t learn evolutionary biology. And Darwin was at least empirical. There has been a shit ton of empirical biology since Darwin’s time. You have to read that too. In fact, you can do well without reading Darwin at all. If you read Galileo you learn what Galileo thought, and some history, but you also can pick up some valuable knowledge about motion, the universe and everything, so the teaching of physics tends to follow the historical discovery path, as that is, more often than… Read more »
Great to read your hanging out with others SJF Are you coming to 21 convention?
What get’s you reading and off the blog speaking and sharing about something in person. Anything i share in person would be with my own word’s.
As far as self -sabotage i can see many thing’s i have done that could point to me struggling on my own evolution and interest.
Found this one as a good listen.
https://bit.ly/2MtPz42
Yes these are on my mind Post relevant
Performance Family Pattern of Performance Business fail at what your uncomfortable at.
https://bit.ly/2xdfRlp
Oh Sandy…
Off topic: if a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bike then a man needs a woman like an eagle needs a bowling ball.
@KFG: My interest in reading Freud is only to understand “psychosexual development” in humans. I am not studying his life or defending his theories. I am not sure why everyone is trying to push me in a corner to have an argument and making me defend my interest in this topic. We have varied interests, and just because we are “Red Pilled” does not mean that we read only books / articles on banging women, and nothing else. This is not a cult. @SJF: “Reality Transurfing” by Vadim Zeland. (but I realize most people don’t have the time, nor the… Read more »
” . . . just because we are “Red Pilled” does not mean that we read only books / articles on banging women, and nothing else.”
I have read Freud, although I did not enjoy it any more than I enjoyed reading Marx.
Red pill ain’t about banging women.😁 slowly but surely red pill is being conflated with pickup.
Trending.
That’s a danger for red pill going forward.
@KFG:
“I have read Freud, although I did not enjoy it any more than I enjoyed reading Marx.”
And I respect your opinion because it is based on of your own research.
IMO the big fail is that the root cause of hypergamy is misrepresented as evolutionary. It’s human nature we are talking about, not human biology. Hypergamy hasn’t evolved, it was born in the Garden of Eden.
In other news, Warner Bros drops Henry Cavill as “Superman”.
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment/movies/henry-cavill-reportedly-out-as-superman-%e2%80%93-black-panther-star-tipped-to-wear-the-cape/ar-BBNeCLy?li=BBoPWjQ&ocid=iehp
He spoke out against the #MeToo movement two months ago and he even apologised for it. And now he is dropped from the franchise. Perhaps it is just a coincidence, nothing to see here.
whenever a woman hears I have 5 kids they get a visceral reaction.
This story going around again…
http://nextimpulsesports.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/192/2018/06/Keee.png
I imagine that reaction would only be amplified with 5 kids by 3 women…
a PSA to the baby mamas… lmao
“Shameika;Trice;Chelsie All mother’s of my kids love y’all”
lmao
Of course there is intra group drama… but that is good…
recently out with my WK buddy… his wife basically told him she wanted to watch tv rather than spend time with him… so we are out at a bar, getting late. I get some texts, he sees me get them and i’m laughing he’s like what? I show him… My wife “are you being good?” lol
He just can’t comprehend… the wheels turn up in that numbskull but you can see he can’t process, he thinks I’m a huge asshole…
I try and tell him…
“My interest in reading Freud is only to understand “psychosexual development” in humans. I am not studying his life or defending his theories. I am not sure why everyone is trying to push me in a corner to have an argument and making me defend my interest in this topic. We have varied interests, and just because we are “Red Pilled” does not mean that we read only books / articles on banging women, and nothing else. This is not a cult.” I posted a bunch of links on another thread which clearly show that Freud was a precursor to… Read more »
“Modern empirical knowledge . . . Can be utilised either to wipe out the entire planet or save lives and cure diseases.”
Because it is reliably predictable. Even in the 20s Bernays knew more about psychology than Freud.
“Even in the 20s Bernays knew more about psychology than Freud.”
Freud theorised on the psychoanalysis of “an individual”. Bernays was a master at controlling the collective psyche of “the masses”.
@ Blaximus “Red pill ain’t about banging women.😁 slowly but surely red pill is being conflated with pickup. Trending. That’s a danger for red pill going forward.” I think it should be about banging women Blax. And should be grounded in field work by PUA. Pick Up Artistry. Red Pill is about inter-sexual dynamics awareness. Game is about practice. I’m still sad the OMG or Married Red Pill (monogamous or not) has to be a tribe different than young or old single man game. One big red pill tribe swapping notes, rather than two different tribes protecting their perimeter with… Read more »
“Warner Bros drops Henry Cavill as “Superman”.
blinds say he was banging 14 year olds in china while doing mission impossible press
legal there but bad for pr here
“A couple of summers ago, I was at a rally downtown. About 10,000 people.showed up almost organically. A few hours in, some chicks.wearing blm shirts showed up and bum rushed for every available microphone. It was all about publicity and a measure of notoriety.
Somebody punched one of them in the face.
I.didn’t see anything.😀”
If Bernie Sanders had done the same thing awhile ago, when they usurped his podium and cucked him royally, he might be president today.
@Dysgenic, I get involved with family law and parental alimentation issues, but didn’t call her/him/troll out. Sorry brother.
@Dysgenic
“I didnt read all the comments but im disappointed that the comments that i did read failed to take her to task on this issue.'”
Most commenters here are more PUA than MRA! I Think of the manosphere as The Good (MRA), the Bad (PUA) and the Ugly (MGTOW).
incubus @AR: You have a problem with Freud without even reading his work.. How do you know that to be true? And I don’t have time to spend hours explaining psychology to you. If you cannot explain it, do you really understand it? I’m not the person who dragged Freudianism in here. I’m just asking questions that apparently cannot be answered. Science is testable. That’s why thermodynamics doesn’t use phlogystin in analysis. The replication crisis in psychology is real and it is revealing a lot of junk thought. Some of that junk thought influenced public and private policies for years.… Read more »
The future is post-empirical:
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-oped-duped-by-diversity-20180906-story.html#
Orson I posted a bunch of links on another thread which clearly show that Freud was a precursor to many things happening today in various disciplines and some guys here still hold onto some misconceptions they have That’s one view. Another view: you posted a collection of links that clearly show True Believers in Freud are still trying to convince others that Freudianism is still relevant. Still relevant!!! Fads and politics exist in any group of humans. There’s a great deal of politics in the fields of psychology and psychiatry. That includes the rear-guard action by the declining number of… Read more »
@AR: You clearly have Daddy issues. Just taking Freud’s name set you off. “If you cannot explain it, do you really understand it?” You want me to explain Psychology to you in this comments section? Seriously? “I’m not the person who dragged Freudianism in here. I’m just asking questions that apparently cannot be answered.” I don’t owe you jack shit to answer your stupid questions. I stated my opinion based on my study of his theories. If you have a different opinion, so be it. Don’t keep pestering me to explain shit to you. Go and ask your Daddy to… Read more »
fleezer
blinds say he was banging 14 year olds in china while doing mission impossible press
Boys or girls? Both?
Are we going to have to learn Pinyin for “MeToo” now?
“The replication crisis in psychology is real and it is revealing a lot of junk thought. Some of that junk thought influenced public and private policies for years.”
“soft” science = not science
psychology is about framing and manipulation
i can’t believe it’s legal to print psy101 textbooks
“Boys or girls? Both?”
girls i think. an ex may have found some video of him with her high school friends (john doe twitter – links with enty a lot)
Incubus
@AR: You clearly have Daddy issues. Just taking Freud’s name set you off.
Once upon a time, a $cientologist informed me that I clearly had engram issues that needed to be cleared, because just encountering L. Ron Hubbard’s name set me off laughing.
fleezer
“Boys or girls? Both?”
girls i think. an ex may have found some video of him with her high school friends (john doe twitter – links with enty a lot)
That’s enough to toast him, especially in the current climate.
kfg
The future is post-empirical:
Fallen Angels by Pournelle and Flynn was fiction. I don’t want to live there…
First time commenter here. I’ve came across the manosphere and The Rational Male less than a year ago, and working my way through Rollo’s 3 books currently. I’m 48, live in New Zealand, married for 12 years, have two boys aged 11 & 9. I’m going to have a go at address Ugh’s confusions, based on my understanding of what Rollo is saying. Hypergamy in itself is not nasty, it just ‘is’. It’s what women are predisposed to, by virtue of evolutionary biology. It only becomes nasty when it’s not adequately managed by men in of setting a strong masculine… Read more »
Totally OT: Teens react to Windows 95
“What’s a modem?”
“So many people are frightened to take a chance in life and there’s so many chances you have to take,” –Jimmy Page