The Rational Male – Positive Masculinity

PM_cover

I’m happy to announce today that The Rational Male – Positive Masculinity is now available on Amazon. The Kindle version is now available too.

Positive Masculinity is the newest supplemental reading in the Rational Male series designed to give men, not a prescription, but actionable information to build better lives for themselves based on realistic and objective intersexual dynamics between men and women.

The book outlines four key themes: Red Pill Parenting, The Feminine Nature, Social Imperatives and Positive Masculinity.

Free of the pop-psychology pablum about parenting today, Red Pill Parenting is primarily aimed at the fathers (and fathers-to-be) who wanted more in depth information about raising their sons and daughters in a Red Pill aware context. While not an instruction manual, it will give men some insight into how to develop a parenting style based on Red Pill principles as well as what they can expect their kids to encounter from a feminine-primary social order determined to ‘educate’ them.

The Feminine Nature is a collection of essays, revised and curated, that specifically address the most predictable aspects of the female psyche. It outlines and explores both the evolutionary and socialized reasons for women’s most common behaviors and their motives, and how men can build this awareness into a more efficient way of interacting with them.

Social Imperatives details how the female psyche extrapolates into western (and westernizing) cultural narratives, social dictates and legal and political legislation. This is the Feminine Imperative writ large and this section explores how feminism, women’s sexual strategy and primary life goals have molded our society into what we take for granted today. Also detailed is the ‘women’s empowerment’ narrative, and the rise of a blank-slate egalitarian equalism masking as a form of female supremacism that has fundamentally altered western cultures.

The last section, Positive Masculinity, is comprised of essays, reformed and expanded upon, that will give men a better idea of how to define masculinity for themselves from a conventional and rational perspective. In an era when popular culture seeks to dismiss, ridicule, shame and obscure masculinity, this section and this book is intended to raise men’s awareness of how fluid redefinitions of masculinity have been deliberately used to disempower and feminize men by a feminine-primary social order.

This book was a long time in the making and a lot of that was due to my wanting to create an organized flow of topics as well as to make sure the grammar and syntax was as perfect as I could make it. Like my two previous books, I’ve returned to my most popular essays and arranged them to speak to different themes in the book.

When I began writing, compiling and rewriting this book I had an initial working title – The Rational Male, The Red Pill – however, as I progressed I shifted this to Positive Masculinity. There came a point in my compiling and editing where I’d taken a different path in the purpose of the book. Where I had wanted to explain and/or defend the initial, intersexual, definition of what the term ‘Red Pill‘ has increasingly been distorted away from, I found myself leaning more into expressing ways in which this Red Pill awareness could benefit men’s lives in many ways, both in and apart from intersexual dynamics.

I’d hit on this in my Red Pill Parenting series from a couple years ago and I knew I wanted to revisit and make that series a prominent part of this book. As it sits now, it accounts for a full quarter of the book’s content, but as I moved into my writing more I decided that the best way to really define ‘The Red Pill” as I know it was to go into the various ways men might benefit from redefining masculinity for themselves in a conventional, Red Pill aware sense.

When I finished the parenting section I realized that I was really laying out general, if not prescriptive, ideas for ways men might better raise their sons and daughters in a feminine-primary social order that’s determined to raise and condition them. My purpose with both the series and section was to equip fathers with Red Pill aware considerations in making their sons and daughters Red Pill aware themselves in order to challenge a world that increasingly wants to convince us that fathers’ influence is superfluous or dangerous.

It was from this point that I’d made a connection; what I was doing was laying out a much-needed reckoning of sorts with regard to what conventional, positive masculinity might mean to future generations of Red Pill aware men. Since my time on the SoSuave forums and the inception of my blog I’ve used the term Positive Masculinity. I’ve even had a category for it on my side bar since I began too. From the time I began writing I’ve always felt a need to vindicate positive, conventional masculinity (as well as evolved conventional gender roles for men and women) and separate it from the deliberately distorted “toxic” masculinity that the Village of the Feminine Imperative would have us believe is endemic today.

IMG_3176

I’ve always seen a need to correct this intentionally distorted perception of masculinity with true, evolved, biologically and psychologically inherited aspects of conventional masculinity. This is what I set out to do with this volume. I’m prepared for critics to paint this purpose as some want to return to some pro-masculine glory days of the “chauvinist 1950s”, but the intent is not about building a time machine. Rather, it’s a pragmatic look at how a male-exclusive masculinity has been made ambiguous, distorted or demonized with the deliberate intent of destroying its true, conventional definitions. Furthermore, I layout the evolutionary and biological differences that make masculinity a male-exclusive definition and provide information and encouragement in men’s reclaiming masculinity away from a social order that seeks to destroy it and men.

Some have asked me why I’d title the book Positive Masculinity, worried that it would imply that there is a negative opposite to it. This work sets out to break down the latent purposes of why present day “masculinity” is already considered a default negative, ridiculous or shamed, and how to embrace conventional, evolved masculinity, unapologetically as a source of strength despite a world that wants to erase it.

I hope you’ll benefit from reading it as you have with all my work. It’s been a definite labor of love. The book is a robust 364 pages long. I do have plans for an audio version in about 6 or 7 month’s time.

I’ll be returning to my regular essay postings next week. Thanks for reading.

– Rollo Tomassi

152 comments

  1. “I’ve always seen a need to correct this intentionally distorted perception of masculinity with true, evolved, biologically and psychologically inherited aspects of conventional masculinity. This is what I set out to do with this volume. I’m prepared for critics to paint this purpose as some want to return to some pro-masculine glory days of the “chauvinist 1950s”, but the intent is not about building a time machine. Rather, it’s a pragmatic look at how a male-exclusive masculinity has been made ambiguous, distorted or demonized with the deliberate intent of destroying its true, conventional definitions. Furthermore, I layout the evolutionary and biological differences that make masculinity a male-exclusive definition and provide information and encouragement in men’s reclaiming masculinity away from a social order that seeks to destroy it and men.”

    Thanks for helping m along the journey

  2. >> Where I had wanted to explain and/or defend the initial, intersexual, definition of what the term ‘Red Pill‘ has increasingly been distorted away from, I found myself leaning more into expressing ways in which this Red Pill awareness could benefit men’s lives in many ways, both in and apart from intersexual dynamics.

    This is solid. This is saying YES to something, as opposed to saying, “no, no, no,” to something else. Leadership means saying YES to something. This is about creating, not relegating oneself to the role of the critic.

    I’m a big fan of the concept of “how you do anything is how your do everything.”

    The RSD guys have a saying, “be at the cause, not at the effect.” That is a more nuanced comment on leadership. It’s an antidote to the weak-hand of always reacting to the culture… never leading the culture. It’s about defining the debate, not trying to come up w/ zingers for a war against a hostile framework.

    Masculinity and Patriarchy has been about leading, creating order. It was more than a “patch job” on a bad idea, it was starting with good ideas, starting with “true north” and working toward that vision.

    I want to be a man that has a clear YES he is working toward. And I will take leadership from other men that have a clear, bold “yes” of their own. I like the tone of all this.

  3. Congrats! I will be purchasing soon as I have your other books in support and gratitude for all you do.

  4. I’m very excited to dig into this book. It’s available now on Kindle if anyone is wondering. I picked it up along with your first book, been meaning to do that for a while now. I’m doing my best to share this information with every guy I know, or come into contact with online. Especially the guys that really fail with women and dating. It’s tough to steer them to your work, but I’m not going to quit on them. Thank you, thank you, thank you. I’m glad I can buy your books, because I can’t afford the seminars but def want to show you some support.

  5. Do you have a chapter about how ugly old farts who never managed to accomplish much in their lives, and young fresh turds just shy of 30 who never accomplished much in their lives tend to shave their heads and become “spiritual” teachers?

  6. Congrats with the 3rd book, Rollo!
    Hope it (the book-form) will be available in Europe soon.
    Reading your second book right now..

  7. @Rollo, I think it was a good decision not using the words “Red Pill” in the title of the book. The Red Pill metaphor is about waking up to reality, and as important as waking up to the reality of sexual dynamics is, it’s hardly the only sphere of human knowledge the metaphor can be applied to. The manosphere does not and should not hold a monopoly on the descriptor. I think all areas of thought that use “Red Pill” need to start distinguishing themselves. We need to come up with a more precise descriptor, something like the “Red Pill of Sexual Dynamics.” This way we retain the power of the original descriptor but distinguish it from what is referred to as a (purely political) Red Pill (and all the other types of red pills people are pushing in cyberspace and society at large).

  8. I will join others in congratulating you Rollo. As a man in the western world it is obvious how important your work is, especially when you can see other men you teach or interact with being on the receiving end of the negative connotations of the female imperative. This book will join the others of yours that I have and will be subjected to a thorough going over complete with note taking like the others. It’s a never ending journey and it is a pleasure to have your work helping me along the way.

  9. Thanks all.

    @Anvil, yeah, I’d started out wanting to correct the definition of TRP since it’s been so overly appropriated by so many profiteers, but that genie is out of the bottle. All I’d be doing was what the rest of these carpet baggers are doing, cashing in on the brand of TRP. It was too narrow to write a book about.

  10. “Do you have a chapter about how ugly old farts who never managed to accomplish much in their lives, and young fresh turds just shy of 30 who never accomplished much in their lives tend to shave their heads and become “spiritual” teachers?”
    Aahahahaa
    Must perform…

  11. @Yollo

    HOW DARE YOU
    I am neither ugly, nor old.
    Well, maybe you could say I’m well-struck in years.
    And I did not shave may head, I ran out of Rogaine.
    (I hate when that happens)
    Now, back to my spirits.

  12. “Now, back to my spirits.”

    I am told there are now 28 ways to make sex on a beach,A regular bartenders kamasutra.

    Rollo sounds great I ordered the paperback and will have it friday.

  13. Had a queue of books on Amazon, waiting for this to be released. When I heard it was available, I put my order in. Can’t wait to read it. Yours, Charles Bukowski and Jack Donovans books are the only ones I buy with hesitation.

  14. Thank you, thank you. I’m downloading it now. This process seems to be almost “never ending”. I guess there is so much to unravel, even for someone like myself who thinks he basically has a good grip on things. I’m always hungry for more insight, others point of view and little neuances I’ve not considered.

  15. @Rollo

    Since your time on the SoSuave forums and since the inception of your blog, you used the term Positive Masculinity. Thank the gods for that too, because that indeed needs to be a headline of Red Pill.

    Back in 2015, ScribblerG and Forge the Sky and myself used to have a game of round robin-ing emails to each other. It was incredibly productive in learning about ourselves and improving ourselves in red pill aspects.

    Early on, I used a word to describe what we were doing and ScribblerG took great offense to that word (as he should have).

    In your introduction to the new book, you explain that the emphasis, focused on men’s personal development, and then your reluctance to classify the book as “personal development” because it smacks of the Power of Positive Thinking schtick (form over substance in most cases) of positive mindset gurus selling old, formulaic optimism for sales.

    Well I had to think hard what that term I used back then, just now, because I had replaced it when he immediately reacted and rejected it as a term he totally loathed. But I thought hard just now and remembered what term I used. It was the term “therapy”.

    So I thought, back then, that is a fucking pussy term. And early on I declared that going forward the term should now be, for what we are doing: “Masculine Self-Improvement”. And it has worked wonders for me this last three years.

    Thanks.

  16. “This process seems to be almost “never ending”.

    Thank God for That. In addition to my other passions and pursuits and hobbies I have turned it into a desirable, fun, enthusiastic Game (if the peanut gallery hasn’t already noticed).

    I certainly hope it never ends.

  17. The war can be won, there is still hope, congrats bro for the book and congrats for all that will read it, including myself

  18. Great stuff Rollo. I see this as a good opportunity to re-read the other two books before I buy the new one.

  19. Ordered! Thank you Rollo. I read your insights religiously, as well as the comments section here

  20. Hehehe…
    Neil Strauss

    Pick up is great pastime. But making a career out of it? Veeery tricky.

  21. Rollo: Congrats on reaching your goal and thank you; I do appreciate your articulate insight.

  22. A new book, outstanding! And a ballsy title too! Keep kicking ass and thanks for your continued hard work and dedication to men and the manosphere

  23. Great! I’ll order this book immediately it becomes available on Amazon Canada… I have read the first two books and look forward to delving into this one.

  24. Rollo, congratulations on another big milestone. I’m enjoying your positive masculinity and parenting writing. Desperately needed. Keep up the excellent work!

  25. Congrats one your 3rd book man! TRM was my first foray into red pill and it really did help change my life and put me on a better path. Can’t thank you enough!

  26. @Rollo

    Thank you for the book

    Plus:

    ‘@Anvil, yeah, I’d started out wanting to correct the definition of TRP since it’s been so overly appropriated by so many profiteers, but that genie is out of the bottle. All I’d be doing was what the rest of these carpet baggers are doing, cashing in on the brand of TRP. It was too narrow to write a book about.’

    Your end of the thing probably needs re branding.

    TRP will draw the fire – Positive Masculinity has a good ring to it..

  27. in the interest of balance, we need a dose of negative masculinity https://code.likeagirl.io/i-almost-left-tech-today-heres-why-6d146a2f7cf2

    has something for everyone….

    – ‘the game is too hard, make it easier’
    – entitlement
    – I’m highly educated, so I already know how things are, just never had to do anything outside of my safety bubble, thus, my opinion should matter
    – I need pity, not a review of my merits
    – bad patriarchy holding me down
    – as a soldier on the front lines of sexism in tech, I’m a noble SJW
    – it’s all about my solipsism
    – a vow to fight on, you know, like a man would do, those bastards

    I do these as an exercise of spotting FI-stank, did I miss anything?

  28. Well done Rollo, thank you for the book.

    I have an question for you guys. I live in Brazil and here we don’t have Red Pill material in portuguese. I want to start an blog, with what topics should I start?

    Thank you for any help.

  29. Dear Rollo,

    I’m into the newest book and must take a moment to thank you again. Your writing style “improves” with each work, becomes more fluid. You are a delight to read for numerous reasons on several levels, and I sincerely mean that. I consider your first book a cornerstone, a keystone. But this one is also a great one and no less important, useful, personally applicable. Thank you.

    Just for grins, I was thinking…
    ….hmmm… of a possible solution to the overall debacle. This came to me by way of a memory about a book I read during my childhood…

    Here’s what I’m thinking LOL…

    We need to get over all this boy-girl thing, this man-woman thing and while we’re at it get over all the gay-straight, transwhatever, LGBT, bi, fuck the dog, etc. issues. It’s all to confusing, contentious and divisive. The words “boy”, “girl”, “man”, “woman”, “male”, “female”, “gay”, “heterosexual”, “bi” and all others designating “gender” and sexual preferences …and pretenses, should be struck from our language, outlawed and retroactively censured. At our core, we are androgynous. People don’t know who each other are anymore, much less themselves, with this evil diction being used to slander and distort our real identities and divide us. Gender reference itself is a form of character defamation and automatically manifests self evident hatred and bigotry by its reference. Words like “significant other”, “life partner” and “person” are safe, respectful, nonthreatening, inoffensive, and the only morally acceptable ones, all the others are evil distortions of the reality of the real inner person whose soul transcends the irrelevant frivolous inconsequential concepts concieved as the physiological, biological and tangible. Each inner person must not be trespassed against with these evil words at all costs. We are all primarily perfect beings and each is entitled to live an abundantly prosperous life free of contention or struggle and free of all the evil persecutions, claims, and indictments that are inevitably misdirected against the inner person with the hideous delusion that we may be different from one another. Everyone is really the same and equal inside, deep, deep down inside. We are all connected through a collective consciousness like Carl Jung knew and futility tried to explain, poor bastard. We are all part of a genderless, formless, nonracial uniformity, existing within a magical ether that manifests the fundamental origin of the universe. Something in the universe is flawed that makes us lose consciousness of this truth. We should stop blaming each other for the misunderstandings. All of us are the same and perfect but “damaged”, some worse than others, and the wrong words make things worse. We are all just trying to “go home”, to be “saved”. Any word that describes less than the genderless, ageless, nonracial, non-preferential, most fundamental and only important reality about a person will motivate people to think of each other in false terrible harmful destructive ways. If we can get the problems with language resolved, then we can graduate to a level where we can resolve the problems with free thought and all of its terrible heinous transgressions. Only then, will we be able to become who we really are and achieve true peace, equanimity, and nirvana.
    Perhaps we can finally all evolve together into a shimmering blob of formless protoplasm as did Dr. John Pollard in “The Man Who Evolved”.

  30. Question for Rollo

    Positive Masculinity chapter 1 ….”In a positively masculine dominant Frame, where that woman’s desire is primarily focused on her man, (and where that man’s sexual market value exceeds his wife’s by at least a factor of 1)”…

    If a man’s SMV should exceed a woman’s by a factor of 1 for optimal results, (control via potential dread,etc.), then, for all members of the species to have an opportunity to experience optimum complementary relationships, men must be innately higher on the SMV scale than women. Otherwise, a woman of highest SMV wouldn’t stand a chance of experiencing the optimization of a complementary relationship. There would be no men higher than her, only men equal to her would exist and therefore the implied threat of dread would not be there to effectively help control hypergamy. So, therefore it stands to reason, that the highest SMV men are at least one level higher than the highest SMV women. What do you think? Are the highest SMV men in your estimation existing at a higher SMV than the highest SMV women, a level that it is in fact impossible for any woman to reach?

    Perhaps it is best for all men to comprehend that they as a group and as individuals by virtue of their masculinity are a bit higher on the scale than women. I do not advocate a “male supremist movement” or obnoxious arrogance. However, men do have a heck of a lot to offer considering the sacrifices they are willing to make and the real contributions they have made and continue to make in unparalleled initiative, sacrifice, creativeness and productivity. It is like the world is turned upside down. Man should be reviered rather than disrespected and denigrated. Woman should be thankful rather than pedestalized and entitled.

    What do you think?

  31. @Jonatan Miranda Pedresque

    You should start with how hispanics tend to be forced into shitty arrangements with their societies like when Mommy and Daddy tend to believe alot of religious and socialist bullshit because it takes the edge off having to compete for mates.

    You should also look into writing about how being a man with his own Mental Point of Origin doesn’t mean betraying his family. It means reevaluating his commitments and deciding if these commitments are worth perpetuating.

    This of course, sends Papi and Mami flying into a rage. “How dare you??” “You’re so selfish!!”

    “Life is not just about YOU!!” “Sell these drugs you ingrate!!!!” “You should be ashamed!!” “Go to school and be a good provider cow for when I get too old to work but not too old to talk shit about you!!!” “Go to church or Jesus will rape your sister again!!!”

    Hispanic families are FULL of manipulation and violence. Please make some hags and geezers scream for me, caffeine Sambo.

  32. Sentient what do you mean? Surely there is a scale for men too? Just not based on looks (mostly).

  33. @Culum

    There is no scale for men. Just subcommunications:

    “its not whether I’m objectively higher value than another man in your eyes or society’s eyes, it’s only in her eyes that it matters. I have higher overall value in her eyes than her favorite celebrity does (who might be higher in certain categories but not overall). The same dynamic is why women stay with drug dealing shitty men etc. despite their friends telling them he’s shitty…his value is low to everyone else but to HER it’s high”

    https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2011/10/12/wrapped-around-his-finger/

  34. @j – I agree with that, more or less (you missed the Great Looks Thrash of 2016 when this was beaten to death, before YaReally and Scray took off).

    But there’s still a scale – just subcomms based, not looks based. All I mean by “scale” is that even for men, there is a spectrum of attractiveness, ranging from “awful” to “alpha”. The male scale may not necessarily have numbers, and it certainly isn’t looks based, but men do fall on a spectrum of attractiveness, from more attractive to less attractive.

    Now this spectrum for men is more variable and situational than it is for women and can even vary more between women than the equivalent scale for women – but it certainly exists.

  35. Congrats on the book release. Your books leave a lasting legacy of helping men to better navigate the world of interacting with women

  36. @SFC Tom – I don’t know what “Nancy pants” means. However, that whole paragraph I wrote isn’t intended to be a literal endorsement. It is a sarcastic slam against a root of snowflake mentality.

    @Rollo Positive Masculinity “Women are taught that it’s possible to serve two masters, male-comparable achievement and Hypergamy.”

    I never thought about it in terms of two masters. Thanks. That’s a great reinforcement, especially because these two particular masters have contradictory agendas.

  37. @NBTM: “I don’t know what “Nancy pants” means.”

    You can probably work out the metaphor from the item:

  38. Culum

    Sentient what do you mean? Surely there is a scale for men too? Just not based on looks (mostly).

    Well I said “men are not on an HB/SMV scale”, not that there were not gradients of men. The thing is when a guy uses the SMV scale he is immersing himself in the FI frame and it is a false comparison because cats are not dogs anyway…

    So you see a female 7 right? And using SMV scales you do what? Compare yourself to her value… What do you come up with? Are you a 5, a 7, a 9 – a 10? How? Using dog reference points or FI reference points. You are lost off the bat because the map is wrong.

    [Remember Scray’s numerology… LOL. so many points for being X race, clothes etc… solving to accumulate above the targets score…]

    Do women judge men? Of course… There are three categories in my mind:

    Category 1 – Alpha [displaying the triad Dynamic, Passionate & Authentic traits + “just getting it” i.e. understanding the language of female seduction] = Women want to fuck

    Category 2 – Beta = Women will fuck

    Category 3 – All others = they are invisible to women in a sexual context.

    AF/BB is reasonable short hand…

    J

    There is no scale for men. Just subcommunications:

    “its not whether I’m objectively higher value than another man in your eyes or society’s eyes, it’s only in her eyes that it matters. I have higher overall value in her eyes than her favorite celebrity does (who might be higher in certain categories but not overall). The same dynamic is why women stay with drug dealing shitty men etc. despite their friends telling them he’s shitty…his value is low to everyone else but to HER it’s high”

    This is what was so amusing about YaReally’s decline… he was consistently circular in his logic… and ended up kicking his own ass…

    Sucomms end at Comms… “He opened his mouth and spaketh… beta” Bye Bye Chad… ‘Only in Her eyes” sounds like an Arbiter no???

  39. @Culum @Sentient

    You either have alpha subcommunications or beta subcommunications. There is no HB/SMV scale like there is for women. 100% belief that you are the best guy she could get (which is projected through your subcommunications (what you feel she feels)) triggers her hypergamy (“in her eyes”). Therefore, she will simply ignore whatever her friends/society says is “high value”.

    https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/state-of-mind/

  40. Just ordered my copy today.Looking forward to reading it.
    Thank you for this endeavor.

    I accepted and digested a lot of errant guidance and advice for much of my younger life, and am now paying for my ignorance. Still feel a remarkable level of anger at times, but it’s gradually getting better.

    I’m pleased to know that the younger guys have access to this level of knowledge.
    But I’ve learned that mere awareness is not enough.
    Response and action is what makes us better men in the end.

  41. Subcomms are great, until they aren’t… i.e. “comms” can counter subcomms. And vice versa.

    Related, the Authentic tine of the Triad… One of the issues from the earlier dialogue was that of being careful to avoid using mystical “subcomms” as a catch all.

  42. @Sentient – I understand. Basically it’s more useful to think of men as being divided into 2-3 categories. It’s not that there aren’t necessarily gradients within those categories, but for most purposes the three categories will suffice and – importantly – men can’t be fit into a linear scale the same way women can.

    @J – I think your point was similar – essentially saying that men have alpha subcomms (category 1) or not (category 2).

  43. Culum

    Basically it’s more useful to think of men as being divided into 2-3 categories.

    Now you know I’m going to say it’s even more more useful to pursue a dynamic, passionate and authentic life, guided by the Platinum Rule and using the ability to communicate in the female language of seduction [via game] and not think about anything else…

    Go get ’em Tiger…

  44. Hahaha. Indeed. Focussing on the working out and eating well for now in the small town, but it’s starting to show more results for sure. It’s slower with bodyweight training but clear improvement every workout.

  45. “it’s starting to show more results for sure”

    George is impressed… because, you know, he cares.

  46. @Rollo

    Boy oh boy, do you drive it all home.

    “Village of The Damned”

    Yes, some think that cynical no doubt, but not I. Am I angry, yes, and I have every just cause to be. The casualties are appalling.

    I live in an upscale neighborhood, avg income $200K +. Woman across the street has 2 boys, different fathers. Histrionic sales person type, single mom..yeah! You go girl! She was pregnant with first child during her engagement to the first father, left the groom standing at the alter, broke his heart. He was, is “a great guy”, nice, responsible, hard working. Daddy wasted money on a wedding that never happened for typical American princess, blond, hot body, pretty face, no honor. Second child’s father met her at a bar, was a fake rich from another city, older, suave, slick, got caught fucking the maid, so she says. Divorced now with second fatherless child. One father lives 5 hours away by car, the other about 5 hours by plane.

    Girl around the corner, hot, great figure, yoga pants up the crack of her ass everyday at the religious preschool where she “teaches”, yes…the slut shaming is endless from the other less competitive harpies. This one got knocked up by some guy in her early or mid twenties, don’t know if they married or not. He is of course and “asshole”. They had a boy. She married and had a second boy with another man. This second father seems to fit the white knight SJW, trying to be a hero for pussy type, all into saving the planet, etc. He is physically fit, but that alone doesn’t guarantee anything. They just divorced. Apparently she “kicked him out of the house”. Now he apparently found a new “sole mate”, through a sex site, who has a daughter from some other guy, and…she is rumored to be pregnant “accidentally”.

    You are exactly right it is Village of The Damned. And, those experienceing the most damnation are the children, especially the boys. My wife is an early childhood education teacher and I own a construction company, primarily focusing in the residential sector. Both of these vocations provide view into people’s lives more than many other vocations. I’m mid fifties. There has been a very dramatic change in our culture during the past few decades, and I realize it began just as I was becoming old enough to observe. It really has become Village of The Damned. The disruption and distortion of the sexuality of any species will fuck up that species. The “American Dream” has morphed into the American nightmare. We are still the same animals we have been for thousands of years. The situation is so fucked up that I for one among some others do not think it can be corrected by study, revelation, and education. It will take war, bloodshed as it has always in the past.

  47. Oh, forgot to include the people I bid a job for this week. Older couple bought a 2 million dollar house nearby, need some work done. Parents of a single mother, four year old grand daughter, the grandmother told me yesterday she and her husband bought the house so their single mother daughter could move in with them because they are “trying to be good parents”. I wondered if they tried while their daughter was “growing up”. I wondered if they had bailed her out in other ways and if so how many times. There is little family stability anymore in our culture. Family is the primal social group of our very social species, the primary tribal group of our species. The decomposition is alarming. It’s everywhere guys and it is royally fucked up.

  48. Quoting from a comment post within Positive Masculinity – “Now, RP aware, I both understand his choices as well as my own. For me, a lot of it is about the principle of giving of self; it can be both beautiful and destructive. We need fathers to tell sons these things, these words that give steerage to navigate past the treachery and on to the joy that awaits them.”

    There is profound wisdom in this, and it has been stated elsewhere…

    There is a collection of symbolic stories woven into historical accounts compiled 2000 to 1700 years ago within which a main character said, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

    We of course all know who this was, because of the highly popularized and highly hyper promoted account of it. What most do not know is that this same character also said (and with no less importance), “Do not cast your pearls before swine lest they trample them beneath their feet and turn again and tear you to pieces.”

    Isn’t it curious how almost all people are universally aware of “do unto others” but so few are aware of the warning about swine? Why would this warning about swine be so less important that it does not warrant such attention as “do unto others” and why would “do unto others” warrant so much more attention as manifested by popular knowledge? The comprehensive wisdom of an ancient story is dissected so some portions of it can be used for ulterior agendas. It is fragmented, loosing its full truth, transformed into falsehood by its partial omission, leaving most confused about it. This makes the acceptance of falsehoods easier to believe. So, the story itself is in effect hijacked by opportunists seeking to fragment it and use some fragments by design to deceive. Such is the nature of the orchestration of lies.

  49. @Sentient

    There is nothing mystical about subcoms. At least not the way PUAs describe them. The voice is one the 3 major ones.

  50. @Rollo

    I don’t know if this made the news in the US already, but they seem to catch up with the concept of dread. lol
    (of course their interpretetion of the results is quite different)

    “New research from Florida State University finds another factor — attractiveness of a romantic partner — can be a driving force behind the desire to diet and seek a slim body, though that motivation contrasts sharply between men and women.”

    http://news.fsu.edu/news/2017/07/13/fsu-researchers-discover-ugly-truth-attractiveness/

  51. @Sentient

    From memory that guy had had something terrible happen to him where he’d lost his balls or something – I forget what

    But the consequence is that hi is overtly ‘not a man’ and as we all can see this makes him a pitiable laughing stock.

    These people are acting on reflex, it’s not conscious.

    They’re programmed from somewhere very deep.

  52. anon01 – I love deconstructing these articles using a RP lens perspective…. it’s helpful to get good at spotting the subtle ways the FI pushes its agenda.

    Here’s what I found:

    – “…having a physically attractive husband may have negative consequences for wives, especially if those wives are not particularly attractive…” :: how is being motivated to be healthy and attractive to your husband a negative? maybe she can find solace in that her better looking husband looked past her physical inferiority and saw her great personality and character…. what a great guy!

    – “extra motivation to diet, however, did not exist among women judged more attractive than their husbands” :: for women with no fear of their husband leaving, being fat/unhealthy is okay

    – “…linked to other forms of psychological distress, such as depression, anxiety, substance abuse and dissatisfaction with life” :: I do believe that depression and substance abuse are real, but I think here anything that has ‘bad feelz’ gets promoted to illness-level pathologies, as noted by the use of the word ‘distress’ in an attempt to lower the bar; anxiety and dissatisfaction with life are normal parts of living

    – this study used couples “married less than four months, average age late 20s” :: this is still the fucking honeymoon, not a good representation of the marriage situation… at least pick a more representative sample from the pool, maybe couples 5-10 yrs in

    – suggested help for these women? hey fellas, just tell her “You’re beautiful. I love you at any weight or body type” :: yep, lie to her, go soft here and you dick will soon follow

    What did I miss?

  53. ” . . . attractiveness of a romantic partner — can be a driving force behind the desire to diet and seek a slim body . . .”

    Gee, what will they “discover” next?

  54. Rollo – congratulations on your success, may it be long-lived and forever-loved

    prepare for your new(-ish) public exposure; for some folks, there’s nothing they like more than a new target

    maintaining your privacy will not only become more important, but also more difficult; not sure what can be done, but mitigating earlier is better than later

  55. “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win”.

    Kudos Rollo. If things continue going this way, I don’t think the FI has a very bright future.

  56. Look at the other titles I’m up against too

    !!! Those other titles are practically unbelievable, but of course entirely too believable. Positive Masculinity published just in time, we hope.

    Seeing Red Pill material in this category is gonna cause a shock for touchy-feely SJWs

  57. Pingback: The Rational Male – Positive Masculinity
  58. The marketeers at Amazon and the typical readers that aren’t familiar with TRM may not be comprehensively aware of the subject matter. For every person that actually dreads the book there will be some or at least a fraction who claim to have… “Oh yeah, I read that, Oh yeah, yeah I read that…”

    But, I’m glad it’s out there. It’s your best work yet. And it’s better that it is categorized as it is because it has a better chance of connection with non members of the choir and hopefully make a difference there.

  59. From Positive Masculinity – “My SMV (sexual market value) graph was never meant to be some canonical tablet handed to me from the Almighty…….those critics aren’t wrong to suggest that this outline would be subject to the social environments and simple physical realities of earlier times, and likely some times yet to come.”

    I disagree with you a bit here. I think you are due more credit than you appear to attribute yourself. Your SMV graph sure seems to be very accurate applied to a wide range of cultures, time periods and circumstances than not. It may not be in stone from the almighty, but it sure seems pretty darn close.

  60. “Socially acceptable premarital sex, abortion, sperm banks and unilaterally feminine controlled birth control meant that women had an unprecedented degree of control over their Hypergamous decision making.”

    ….eliminated most negative consequences of unbridled hypergamy for women to the advantage of women and disrupted the balance of control in favor of women’s prerogatives. Naive “men”, (really dope smoking acid dropping boys mostly, living in a fantasy world) mistakenly saw this as an advantage for them, not realizing that it gave women almost total control over the cookies and which men get the cookies on a mass scale like never before.

    Like some pesticides that interrupt the reproductive process of insects, it is effectively and literally a perverted form of semihumanicide. Some may consider this positive because it can be viewed as human natures way of limiting what nature limited in the past with disease, famine, war, natural disasters, etc. Who knows where we will go from here long term. Strange times, especially considering the promotion of transgenderism, homosexuality, LGTB, etc. Was there ever a time in history when such perversions were mass promoted on such a scale, while those who do not endorse those strange atypical behaviors are diagnosed as being phobic, accused of being mentally ill essentially, socially banished, and the far more accepted typical heterosexuality marginalized all by a small group of strange cultural puppeteers?

  61. Rollo

    Those Amazon listings…

    The Law of Unintended Consequences is sublime…

    Congrats. Praise Zeus for your efforts…

  62. @Rollo

    Your podcast with Andrew Johnson and new book are phenomenally well spoken and written.

    I’m only one hour into the podcast and 60 pages into the book.

    Outstanding. Knowledge is power and hope. Which leads to Action. Action leads to choosing. Choice is freedom. It doesn’t cost extra.

    “If knowing is half the battle, taking action is the other half.”

    Indeed.

    Reality Transurfing motto: “I do not want or hope, I intend.”

    Women talk, Men do.

  63. Marquis and others with coming of age boys…

    You may be interested in this list put together by CH commenter ‘Vagina Dominator” at the Chateau, which PA made into a post on his blog…

    https://paworldandtimes.wordpress.com/2017/07/29/advice-to-a-15-year-old-man-by-ch-reader/

    What do the pua manosphere and shitlords generally believe about women and how to live your life? If you wanted to redpill your 15 year old son (and perhaps give him nightmares) what would you tell him about women and getting laid? I have knocked out a quick list of Polonius-worthy points. You may agree, disagree, or like to add something. [con’t.]

  64. Perhaps, this is unrelated to this post but it’s gotten to the point I have to say something about it.

    By the things I see and observe I am starting to think the term “Alpha” is synonymous with treating people rudely, without regard and then getting butt hurt pissed when they give you a taste of your medicine. The guys who I see claiming or pretending to be Alphas exhibit these traits. Is that what it is then after all?

  65. @Jafyk:

    In response to your question, no.

    Now, if you would be so kind as to reciprocate, are you a serious inquirer who it would be worth my time to enact the labor of engaging with, or are you a troll who would just be a waste of my time and energy?

Speak your mind

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s