The New Polyandry

About five years ago I wrote a post called You Need Sex. In that essay I asserted a few key points about the importance of a healthy sex life for men. If I’m honest I kind of expected most of the reactions I got from that post and even now it remains one of my more contentious pieces. Even when I was in my Blue Pill youth in the 80s and 90s I’d run across the guys who always wanted to deemphasize sex in some reverse-psychology effort to get women to believe that they were deeper than the guys who just wanted to bang them. These were the guys who’d listen to a girl say something like, “I don’t see why sex is such a big deal to guys” or “Am I just a piece of ass to you?“, they’d take it to heart, and then construct some kind of personalized Game around how they respected women and wanted to really relate with them ‘beyond the sexual’.

That’s exactly what the Blue Pill teaches guys; they should always defer to, empathize with and identify with the feminine. This is Blue Pill conditioning at its most basic. It is a boy/man’s imperative to place women’s existence as more important than his own – and with men’s innate protection instincts for women this Blue Pill training is key to establishing a gynocratic social order.

But guys also have to find some way to set themselves apart from the competition in the Blue Pill sexual marketplace. They have to find someway to make themselves unique in how unlike ‘typical‘ guys they are. The miscalculation is, of course, the belief that the more alike, the more they identify, with (as?) women the likelier a woman would select them for intimacy and reproduction. 

Men are natural problem solvers. It’s part of our evolved firmware to look for solutions to challenges in our environment. This makes us constructive, creative, often innovative and more ready to take risks. It also makes us competitive and that competitiveness extends to the sexual marketplace. So it’s not too much of a stretch to see how Blue Pill conditioned young men might look for creative ways to outdo one another in the ‘female-identification olympics

One way this identification competition gets pushed to new heights is in how well a man might better devalue and abase his own sexual strategy to better accommodate that of the woman he believes will appreciate it. Taken to the binary extreme this means finding some way to devalue all men’s sexual natures. What better way to set oneself apart from other guys than to not be a guy? What better way to empathize with the feminine than to tear down the gender women say they despise?

Does all that seem kind of ridiculous? I used to think this way when I was younger. There was a time I might’ve even jumped on the “masculinity is toxic/confusing/outdated/outmoded/ridiculous” train because I truly believed it was the way to a woman’s vagina heart and mind. Even in the 80s and 90s this was a popular misconception. It wasn’t until I’d been through my first bad breakup that I realized the truth. Then I had nothing to lose by making myself more important than the women I was idealizing and behold! The women I wanted, wanted me – sexually to be sure, but they wanted to lock me down in commitment.

In my 20s I had unwittingly shifted from one sexual strategy to another, and I liked the change. It didn’t happen overnight. I had to learn to adopt the attitude, the swagger, the character that would get me laid, but I found that the most important part of playing the game well was putting my own desires well above those of any woman.

Suddenly I discovered I could easily nail the girls I could only jerk off to in my younger years. I can remember the time I first had sex with a girl I thought was the apex of hotness when I was in my teens. She was the best friend of the girlfriend of the drummer in the band I was in then. Both were swimsuit models and I thought I’d finally reached the goal. It wasn’t until after I dumped her to get with a centerfold model that I knew I’d set my sights too low.

Does that sound like a humblebrag? If you’re still held back by a Blue Pill mindset it probably will. I mentioned on a podcast recently that a majority of men will never know sex as anything but a mitigated, compromised transaction. They’ll never know what it’s like to have a woman lust after them. They’ll never experience the dilated eyes of a woman that would give anything to please him in that moment. Not because she’s obligated, but because her ego is validated at the same time her body is aching to have sex with him.

Strategic Pluralism Theory

According to strategic pluralism theory (Gangestad & Simpson, 2000), men have evolved to pursue reproductive strategies that are contingent on their value on the mating market. More attractive men accrue reproductive benefits from spending more time seeking multiple mating partners and relatively less time investing in offspring. In contrast, the reproductive effort of less attractive men, who do not have the same mating opportunities, is better allocated to investing heavily in their mates and offspring and spending relatively less time seeking additional mates.

From a woman’s perspective, the ideal is to attract a partner who confers both long-term investment benefits and genetic benefits. Not all women, however, will be able to attract long-term investing mates who also display heritable fitness cues. Consequently, women face trade-offs in choosing mates because they may be forced to choose between males displaying fitness indicators or those who will assist in offspring care and be good long-term mates (Gangestad & Simpson, 2000). The most straightforward prediction that follows is that women seeking short-term mates, when the man’s only contribution to offspring is genetic, should prefer muscularity more than women seeking long-term mates.

from Why Is Muscularity Sexy? Tests of the Fitness Indicator Hypothesis

The latter quote here is a simple outline of Hypergamy, but the first part, Strategic Pluralism Theory is what I want to focus on today because this is where the “sex is no big deal” cop out derives from for men.

The first sexual strategy, the one in which a higher SMV (sexual market value) male can enjoy the sexual experience of many women is a strategy predicated on what our most basic, evolved, biological instinct directs us to. It served ancestral men better to ‘hit it and quit it’ and move on to the next girl as expediently as possible for a variety of reasons. This is also a reason why women’s Hypergamous filtering is a base part of women’s sexual selection process today. The investment cost of becoming pregnant was so high that it became part of women’s evolved firmware to be hypersensitive to reproduction cues as well as parental investment cues (provisioning resources) to ensure survival of herself and her offspring. If you ever wonder why rape is such an existential fear for women you have to understand that this fear is written deep into women’s evolved mental firmware because of men overriding this filtering process by violence.

The first archetype of Strategic Pluralism Theory we could day is the Alpha archetype. This is the guy who has the luxury, by effort or genetic lottery, to pursue what I’d speculate was our ancestors’ pre-agrarian, hunter-gatherer sexual imperative. This is what guys like to call the “Natural” with women. Thanks so any number of intersexual advantages (looks, Game, social proof, preselection) it serves him best to spread the seed and women are only too happy to enjoy him as well. He represents the 20th percentile in the 80/20 Pareto distribution of the sexual marketplace.

This side of Strategic Pluralism Theory reflects the r aspect of the r/K reproductive theory. A lot of well meaning Red Pill theologians seem to think that r/K reproductive selection is only limited to the female side of the equation. I’d also point out that this applies to the male side as well. Hypergamy is women’s evolved sexual strategy, however, I would argue that men’s innate, default sexual strategy is unlimited access to unlimited sexuality. This r strategy is manifested today in our base predilection for pornography. Untempered by societal restraints, Alpha sexual strategy is what men a majority would default to if given the choice. 

More attractive men accrue reproductive benefits from spending more time seeking multiple mating partners and relatively less time investing in offspring.

I’m establishing this perspective to better illustrate the Beta side of Strategic Pluralism Theory. For sake of convenience I’m labeling men who fall into the ‘more attractive men’ category as Alphas. I don’t think this is too much of a stretch for most of my readers, but if you have a problem with this just consider the statistics laid out in the book Dataclysm. A majority of women rate 80-85% of men as “unattractive”. That last 15-20% are our ‘more attractive’ Alphas here.

This then leaves the remaining ‘less attractive men’ as the Beta cohort. 

…the reproductive effort of less attractive men, who do not have the same mating opportunities, is better allocated to investing heavily in their mates and offspring and spending relatively less time seeking additional mates.

This then is the Beta mating strategy and if it sounds like the conventional idea of monogamy you’re not too far off. This is the K side of the r/K selection theory. Before I continue I want to stress that monogamy or non-exclusivity is not a value judgement in this essay. Alpha Fucks and Beta Bucks has male sexual strategy implications beyond women’s Hypergamy. I refer to Alpha and Beta as placeholder terms here.

For the Beta side of Strategic Pluralism the reproductive strategy is one that, in part, aligns with one side of Hypergamy. The 80% of ‘less attractive’ men find it necessary to compromise their biological imperative (unlimited access to unlimited sexuality) in order to successfully reproduce. This is the nuts & bolts of what is today being called “enforced monogamy”. While this idea is taken to absurd extremes by critics, the premise is rooted in Strategic Pluralism. Since monogamy serves the largest block of men’s reproductive efforts it follows that it would be the institutionalized standard for ‘civil’ society.

Monogamy is Beta

Monogamy is a social norm, if not an evolutionary norm. A lot has been written about how monogamy in its present incarnation – one man, one woman – is really the result of a post-agrarian social order that optimized the sexual strategy of Beta men. In essence socially-enforced monogamy serves the largest population of Beta males.

However, the tradeoff for women was long term provisioning, protection (in as far as the man was capable) and parental investment – all thing conducive to sustainable futures for women and their children. All that was expected of women was a compromise on the Alpha arousal side of Hypergamy. And naturally, Alpha men and most women found ways to circumvent this socio-sexual adaptation that benefitted women in spite of Beta men. 

Monogamy serves Beta men. Alpha men still get sex, broke or not.

I had the above video passed along to me by a Twitter follower about 2 weeks ago. I think he expected me to take issue with how she was defending ‘gold-diggers’ but, ironically, she unwittingly detailed the basics of Hypergamy and Strategic Pluralism Theory. She’s not wrong. Women’s sexual strategy is optimized in conditions of polygamy and polyandry, while men’s sexual strategy – the Beta sides anyway – is optimized in a condition of socially enforced monogamy. 

What’s really ironic is that this girl discounts what so many men discount when they consider Hypergamy. She couches her total perspective on the Beta Bucks, long-term provisioning side of Hypergamy while conveniently omitting the Alpha Fucks side of Hypergamy. The only consideration she has is for resource transfer – again perpetuating the Beta sex experience – and ignoring the fact that even poor men still get to bang women like her if they’re “hawt’. ‘Monogamy is made to benefit men‘, no it’s made to benefit Beta men; Alpha men solve the reproductive problem irrespective of (in spite of) socially enforced monogamy. ‘Broke men don’t get women‘,…unless they’re hot broke men.

I’ve seen Jordan Peterson and more than a few notable evo-psych professors make a similar mistake. They deliberately make Hypergamy solely about the Beta Bucks side of a dualistic mating strategy. Mostly this misdirection is due to personal bias or a want to present the feminine in a positive light. But likewise we also tend to see focus of men’s sexual strategy centering on what long term resources a man has to measure his worth by. Historically, women have generally been the losers in a social order based on a monogamy that tries to ensure that the most men (majority Beta) are solving the reproductive problem. Because women lacked the same resource generating capacity of men, because up until 50 years ago women needed men to solve the Beta Bucks side of Hypergamy, monogamy was a at least a workable solution to their own reproductive problem.

In 2018 this is no longer the case. For all of the bleating of women wanting a ‘good man’ once they exit the cock carousel, the reproductive problem they’re trying to solve isn’t founded in the Beta Bucks side of Hypergamy it’s on the Alpha Fucks side. For as much as the women in this video tried to defend their mercenary sexual strategy of being justifiable gold diggers they really didn’t need to. All of the provisioning needs side of Hypergamy is relatively provided for for women in western cultures today.

The monogamous priority – the one that tried to ensure that most Beta men reproduced – that priority has now shifted to a neo-polyandry. This new social mechanic attempts to solve the Alpha Fucks side of the reproductive problem for the largest number of women. Just as patriarchal monogamy attempted to aide men who wouldn’t otherwise reproduce, the new polyandry seeks to ensure that even the lowest SMV women are entitled to breed with an Alpha male of their choosing.

Once all social stigma and religious buffers were removed from Hypergamy (since the Sexual Revolution) it has been a rapid shift from a male-beneficial monogamy that’s been the social norm for millennia to a form of polyandry that benefits the female sexual strategy.

I’ll be continuing this post in the next essay, but before I leave this essay let me reiterate the Cardinal Rule of Sexual Strategies: For one sex’s strategy to be fulfilled the other’s must be compromised or abandoned. Think of this on a sociological meta-scale.

Published by Rollo Tomassi

Author of The Rational Male and The Rational Male, Preventive Medicine

Leave a Reply

  Subscribe  
Notify of
Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus

Some *

Not All.

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus

People die in car accidents. Cars kill people. Everyone that drives will die in a fiery crash.

theasdgamer
Guest

It has to do with policy and it’s repercussions, and both ” parties” have been co-opted by big banking/corporations, and alllll them lobbyists. Not so much the repubs any more…a lot of those who were in the pocket of Big Business didn’t seek another term…like Flake…of course, McConnell and Graham are deep in the pocket of Big Bi’ness…as are ALL the dems…the repubs are moving back towards being the party of small business. Not totally there yet. Remember 10 years ago ” we ” were told that the housing market would most likely never go down again? I don’t recall… Read more »

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus

” I don’t recall any such thing…”

Lmao. Okaaayyyy, I see what the problem is here.

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus

” Well, GM is primarily a lending company. If we are to believe China–that it will reduce tariffs on U.S. autos (watch their actions, not their words), then U.S. companies will start exporting cars to China.” This isn’t based on reality. https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/cars-made-in-china ( nobody wants our shitty cars..) ….borrowed from whom? Federal Reserve and large banks, including foreign banks. They who must not be named benefit a lot. https://www.businessinsider.com/us-treasury-countries-hold-the-most-us-debt-2017-1?r=UK&IR=T#14-saudi-arabia-967-billion-7785-billion-6 Finding the money to pay investors who hold government debt will crimp other parts of the budget. In a decade, interest on the debt will eat up 13 percent of government… Read more »

LEX
Guest
LEX

“Just as patriarchal monogamy attempted to aide men who wouldn’t otherwise reproduce, the new polyandry seeks to ensure that even the lowest SMV women are entitled to breed with an Alpha male of their choosing.” I disagree on this point. The low SMV women may feel entitled, but in the ‘unlimited options’ sexual marketplace of now, while all the girls are holding out for an Alpha, the top few % good looking / alpha guys have so many options that they can afford to be picky. What people believe they are entitled to, and what they actually get, are two… Read more »

LEX
Guest
LEX

@palmasailor sounds good, we should be in touch. Is there a PM option on here? I am not seeing one.

theasdgamer
Guest

Marc Goldwein, senior policy director at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a research and advocacy organization. Goldwein has been wrong forever. I used to believe that shit, but no more. Interest costs already dwarf spending on many popular programs. For example, grants to students from low-income families for college total roughly $30 billion — about one-tenth of what the government will pay in interest this year. We’re spending about $30 billion too much on college grants. If interest rates increase, so will corporate taxes and gimme programs to the states will decline. We’ll probably put off infrastructure spending… Read more »

Lost Patrol
Guest
Lost Patrol

Married men seem to be more miserable alpha or beta.

Studies have shown that married men live longer. They’re just more willing to die.

palmasailor
Guest
palmasailor

@Blax They’ve been blowing air into a leaking bubble since 2008 at the very least in a frantic attempt to keep it inflated. If you consider that a red book valuation of a property is the value paid between a willing buyer and a willing seller after a period of marketing where the buyer ACTUALLY HAS the money to complete the transaction. That’s the rub. If no one has the money then your shit ain’t worth shit. Furthermore there’s no shit assets propping upnthe shit debt it’s an illusion propping up a confidence trick. Then if you think of the… Read more »

palmasailor
Guest
palmasailor

@Mike Pearse

“But WHY is it worth it?”

You’re still not fully unplugged huh?

It does take time and it can hurt.

Well, firstly you don’t have any choice. They’re just built that way and the game is going to happen with or without you.

Secondly when you accept thats just the way they’re built and have fun with them for ‘what they are’ it’s good.

Dark triad personality traits make it easier.

palmasailor
Guest
palmasailor

@Lex

That would be good..

No pm but palmasailor @ outlook dot com will work..

JohnD
Guest
JohnD

This is the exact reason I omit specific, selected details about myself on Tinder such as my job and education. I know I am a good provisioning catch but want to be that alpha arousal catch. By omitting these details, any match I get I know is about my breeding potential “alpha” over my provisioning side. Once I meet with them I may tell them then about my job etc because it’s value added. If you fail to omit these details you know they’ve possibly (probably) met up with you for provisioning reasons. I just put “employed” on there and… Read more »

palmasailor
Guest
palmasailor

@JohnD

I’d take a guess you’re quite young, in good shape and good looking.

If you’re older, even if you’re in good condition and good looking your options on tinder will be waaaay below what you can get in real life.

Plus you’ll get arthritis in your iFinger from the sheer volume of swiping.

A man of any substance should really have more interesting things to do with his fingers to be honest.

Jafyk
Guest
Jafyk

Just posting this again so you see it. @Rollo as far as defining what the red pill is. I know your blog and books goes into that. However, there may be those who aren’t familiar with them. After you called out Alexander Grace as being a Vichy etc. I did go and watch his video and I honestly believe that his heart is in the right place but he’s misguided. In his video he did appeal to you to engage him in a dialogue to set things straight. I believe this is an opportunity for you to be the authority… Read more »

Incubus_Rising
Guest
Incubus_Rising

Rollo’s catchphrase: “This is the future Feminism has planned for women”.

“Fuck your Morals” … cause HYPERGAMY DOSEN’T CARE

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus

That’s not Hypergamy. That’s a drunk, desperate, horny broad. She’s not looking for a better option, she’s begging for any option.

Don’t misidentify.

It’s instructive whenever a woman goes fully blatant like that, even if they are drunk. She’s attempting to communicate like a ” man “, or how she thinks is the most effective way to get the quick penis she wants.😂

I’ve seen dozens of begging bitches. When you rebuff them, you usually get some lane attempt at shaming – ” what? Are you gay? You.Don’t like pussy? “.

No, I’m particular.

Hypergamy isn’t about a chick hounding random dudes.

Blaximus
Guest
Blaximus

That dude? He held his frame. Good for him.

Morgan The SJW Hillbilly
Guest

You raped me!!! My inbred redneck brothers are gonna kick your ass for this!!!! They are coming with their repeaters, carabines and revolvers hahahahahahhahahahahahahahha

THEY ARE WICKED!!!!!! THE RED MEN GROUP RAPED MEEEE!!!

boulderhead
Guest

“Men are natural problem solvers. It’s part of our evolved firmware to look for solutions to challenges in our environment. This makes us constructive, creative, often innovative and more ready to take risks. It also makes us competitive and that competitiveness extends to the sexual marketplace. So it’s not too much of a stretch to see how Blue Pill conditioned young men might look for creative ways to outdo one another in the ‘female-identification olympics.”

https://pjmedia.com/drhelen/can-a-man-be-too-handsome/

The Silver FoX
Guest
The Silver FoX

Yeah Rollo, that’s where it’s at… The ole Silver Fox is BIT, back in town, boys! At a music festival a couple of weekends ago, before i even performed, a hot 27 yo jumped me (25 years my junior) & it looks like it could be something more than just some festival fling… That look in her eye as Rollo described (which i have experienced much of in the past before my recent 12 month dry spell), bareback good times, her all over me in front of all comers, all my mates very impressed, the full story soon in FR’s…

j
Guest
j

@fox

Congrats mate!

EhIntellect
Guest

@ JohnD Good Morning. Regarding obfuscating your provider status, that’s a legit issue. Unsolicited advice incoming…. You said you have hobbies, that means you’ve more than cursory knowledge of something other than your career, right? Talk about your hobby in a meager-earning artistic way as if it IS your career and though you don’t earn much from it, you earn enough to be happy and all the best things in life are free…right? How romantic! IOW, lie about yourself. I’ve never been a strong believer in telling women the truth about anything and there’s nothing more thrilling than happily sitting… Read more »

SJF
Guest

“IOW, lie about yourself. I’ve never been a strong believer in telling women the truth about anything …..

It’s all covert, I’ve done it and it works.”

You mean The Red Pill is amoral? It’s OK to cheat?

Go figure.

Women’s sexual strategy frequently involves double binds for the man?

How the hell did that happen?

BluePillProfessor in regards to MRP talks about this and uses the analogies of The Gordian Knot and the Kobayashi Maru (Cheat Like Captain James T. Kirk?) in regards to the normal female sexual strategy of putting men in a double bind scenario:

https://youtu.be/W2VS8c5MTjs

O.B.I.T.
Guest
O.B.I.T.

@Lex / palmasailor “I used to pull more, and hotter women, when I was young and broke. It really seemed that it worked in my favor. I think these women really are turned on by losers. Now that I have a nice house and car, it’s as though that is all they see” Bad boys yes but not losers. You clearly were not a loser then because look at you now. Been thinking about the “young and broke” phase you raise — worked for me so I’m wondering why. Women do want to see some spark of talent, amused mastery… Read more »

Sentient
Guest
Sentient

” Women do want to see some spark…”

The Alpha Triad traits can be displayed regardless of SES…

https://newlyaloof.wordpress.com/2016/12/02/sentients-dynamic-passionate-authentic-framework/

Not Born This Morning
Guest

@Anonymous Reader “Not Born This Morning “Biological Man”? WTF is a “Biological Man” Bruce Jenner. You sure that you weren’t born this morning?” Anonymous reader – You obviously respect the term “biological man” by “knowing what it means”. By referring to Bruce Jenner as a “biological man” you naïvely, ignorantly and stupidly acquiesce to your overlords who you are so willfully and anxiously eager to please. “Biological man” is a politically correct pseudo academic term for the likes of Bruce Jenner. It tiptoes around, ignores and distracts from his most significant characteristic. Certainly, Jenner was born male and still is… Read more »

EhIntellect
Guest

“So no longer being young and broke”

Success is a left handed blessing.

Water slakes thirst and then sated, man wants wine.

The man who’s amassed his stuff is no happier than the guy who doesn’t want stuff. It happens the latter is a lot easier to achieve.

O.B.I.T.
Guest
O.B.I.T.

“The Alpha Triad traits can be displayed regardless of SES [socio-economic status]…”

That’s right, and affluence does seem to come with a price if not played right.

We can probably all agree that being OLD and poor sucks, but while you’re still young you can make young-and-broke work just fine. Women like to fill in the blanks in their own minds, so let them, up to a point at least.

Just don’t be a blank slate in your own mind.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader

NBTM Anonymous reader – You obviously respect the term “biological man” by “knowing what it means”. The first step to wisdom is to call things by their right names. 1970’s Olympic gold medal winner Bruce Jenner is a man[1]. Pump him full of hormones so that he grows tits? Still a man. Cut his balls off? Still a man. Flense his penis, cut a hole in his pelvic tissue, turn the penile skin inside out and stick it up into him? Still a man. Every cell has Y chromosomes, he grew up male. Call him a biological male / man… Read more »

EhIntellect
Guest

“You mean The Red Pill is amoral? It’s OK to cheat?”

Let’s go to the OP!

“the reproductive problem they’re trying to solve isn’t founded in the Beta Bucks side of Hypergamy it’s on the Alpha Fucks side.”

Women are convinced of something that just ain’t so.

We’re, in our little way, helping women come around to a truth that benefits both sexes. Doing the correct thing, in the now, takes discipline, courage and faith.

Shit, all this high-minded selflessness doesn’t help my narcissism.

kfg
Guest
kfg

“Bruce Jenner is a man”.

This is not the same statement as “Bruce Jenner is a biological man.” This form of the statement did not exist in my youth, because the word “biological” was redundant.

The fact that it is not now considered redundant indicates a shift in perspective. Using it indicates some acceptance of that perspective.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader

kfg This is not the same statement as “Bruce Jenner is a biological man.” This form of the statement did not exist in my youth, because the word “biological” was redundant. So? The fact that it is not now considered redundant indicates a shift in perspective. In the real world, where I have to live, the current perspective is that a man who puts on a dress can call himself a woman and demand that everyone else do the same. “Or else”. The “or else” varies from venue to venue. But it is there. Pointing out that man-in-a-dress-even-with-balls-cut-off remains a… Read more »

EhIntellect
Guest

https://youtu.be/jgC7uzqBEhU

Caitlyn takes the gold!

boulderhead
Guest

“Bruce Jenner is a biological man.”

As opposed to a a tranny bot.

“Bruce Jenner is a man.”

Compared to a more feminine “biological” woman.

kfg
Guest
kfg

“So?”

So it is advantageous to know whose frame you are operating in and to not yield frame gratuitously.

” . . . where I have to live, the current perspective is that a man who puts on a dress can call himself a woman and demand that everyone else do the same.”

Precisely. I referred to transgenders competing as athletes in the women’s divisions as “men with bows in their hair” with consideration.

boulderhead
Guest

“call the asstard Bruce Jenner what he really is A FUCKING PERVERT!”

Now your just picking gnat shit out of fly shit.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader

The same Narrative that seeks to ban the term “biological man” because it’s like Deadnaming also insists that one man can’t be enough for a woman, so she’s entitled to a second man on the side in her “marriage”.

It is the same “words mean what we say they mean when we say them, so SHUT UP!” SJW Narrative. It is the same “If it is wearing a dress, it’s a woman so SHUT UP!” SJW Narrative.

Bruce Jenner is a man at the biological level Reality. All the tl;dr foaming on the keyboard won’t change that.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader

Boulderhead
“call the asstard Bruce Jenner what he really is A FUCKING PERVERT!”

You write like an SJW. Everyone’s a pervert by someone’s standards.

“Gender dysphoria” is a mental issue. Can’t fix that by surgical mutilation & hormone treatments. This is likely a big factor in the high suicide rate among full “transition” trannys. The get all cut up and still have the same problems…

kfg
Guest
kfg

“The same Narrative that seeks to ban the term “biological man” . . .”

Although, oddly enough, “transgender woman” means the same thing.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader

kfg “So?” So it is advantageous to know whose frame you are operating in and to not yield frame gratuitously. Yet you yield frame to the SJW’s by joining with them in castigating a scientifically accurate term. Curious. ” . . . where I have to live, the current perspective is that a man who puts on a dress can call himself a woman and demand that everyone else do the same.” Precisely. I referred to transgenders competing as athletes in the women’s divisions as “men with bows in their hair” with consideration. But now you join them in having… Read more »

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader

kfg
“The same Narrative that seeks to ban the term “biological man” . . .”

Although, oddly enough, “transgender woman” means the same thing.

Nope. You’re old enough to know better, too.

kfg
Guest
kfg

“But now you join them in having a hissy fit about calling things by their right names.”

NBTM is having a hissy fit. I am not. Nor am I castigating anyone for anything.

“Yet you yield frame to the SJW’s by joining with them in castigating a scientifically accurate term.”

The scientifically accurate term is “male.”

“Bruce Jenner is a man . . .”

There ya go, although it would be better if we had not abandoned the use of the male prefix. The lack of it tends to objectify men.

EhIntellect
Guest

Can I get a premium reduction on a whim? Maybe…. Please note the statements are the unedited responses of underwriters at some of our life insurance companies and do not reflect the views of Quotacy as a company. We may issue Standard male rates assuming no history of depression, anxiety or other issues. We may issue Preferred male rates pending on medical history. We may issue Preferred female rates pending medical records and that applicant is following post-surgery requirements such as counseling and hormone therapy. We cannot issue until 3 years post-surgery and would rate as female then. We would… Read more »

EhIntellect
Guest

“NBTM is having a hissy fit.”

NBTM is TRM’s house Islamist: perpetually indignant.

boulderhead
Guest

“NBTM is TRM’s house Islamist: perpetually indignant.”

Don’t even quote the guy for a joke,lest you be called out as sounding like SJW.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader

Assume a man past middle age. Surgically remove his testicles and give him drugs that result in an increase of Estrogen in his bloodstream as his T drops to near zero. Result? Higher voice, changes in thinking, more tissue building up on his pecs, loss of muscle mass, shrinking penis, etc. What does this describe? Is it “transition to a woman”, or is it “one kind of end stage treatment for hormonal-dependent prostate cancer”? Question: Does the man described who is slowly dying of cancer turn into a woman when his balls are cut off, or does he remain a… Read more »

kfg
Guest
kfg

“I’m surprised to see some of the regulars going in the SJW direction…”

Such as?

boulderhead
Guest

@AR

You left out one crucial element, place this man in a LTR with American television personality, entertainment manager, producer, businesswoman, and author. She rose to fame. While he is a has been athlete out from under the USOC thumb and under hers. A most effective form of castration.

And some wonder how an ltr works where she has the money and power,look no further.

kfg
Guest
kfg

“You’re old enough to know better, too.”

I’m older than that. When I came into this movie you could be a bit careless with the bandsaw and still count all the genders on the fingers of one hand.

And the term “transgender” would only be coined decades into the future. I remember David Reimer, he was younger than me.

Fred Flange, GBFC (Great Books For Cucks)
Guest
Fred Flange, GBFC (Great Books For Cucks)

With respect to our hypothetical Gratefully Dead-named man, the real source of his syndrome (and so-called treatment/transformation to Magazine Babe) is that which fuels the entire Keeping Up With industry: Dead Kardashian Money. (As in Robert, remember?) Without his dead hand dough, the family would all have remained the meth-mad trailer trash from which they sprung and the fabulous Ms. Deadname would still be singing tenor with the Bruces chorus from the Pythons’ version of Australia. Speaking of bio-Men (the term bio-Woman is used in some circles to denote genuine xx sentient beings), having a prostate (or being born with… Read more »

Not Born This Morning
Guest

“However, the tradeoff for women was long term provisioning, protection (in as far as the man was capable) and parental investment – all thing conducive to sustainable futures for women and their children. All that was expected of women was a compromise on the Alpha arousal side of Hypergamy. And naturally, Alpha men and most women found ways to circumvent this socio-sexual adaptation that benefitted women in spite of Beta men.” The paragraph above and virtually (but not entirely) all of these writings seem to mostly ignore the fact that prior to birth control pills and widely promoted fetal homicide,… Read more »

kfg
Guest
kfg

“Prior to birth control and widely accepted and legally enforced relatively risk free and financially free fetal homicide, women were faced with consequences . . .” . . . such as pregnancy shortly after menarche as something that “just happened.” “IF, in the past, humans were sired by mostly only 20% of the human male population “because 20% are “alpha” and 80% are “beta”, then who sired all the rest?” If you take “alpha” away from “alpha-beta,” what do you have left? “Matriarchy” and The Plan work because betas have children. The fly in the ointment for The Plan is… Read more »

EhIntellect
Guest

NBTM is not only eloquent and articulate, he’s quite glib.

A whiz with the ladies, for sure.

theasdgamer
Guest

“The same Narrative that seeks to ban the term “biological man” . . .”

Although, oddly enough, “transgender woman” means the same thing.

So, are you a transgender woman? lol

theasdgamer
Guest

There goes EI and his acerbic wit. lessee…google “acerbic”…

Definition of acerbic

sharply or bitingly critical, sarcastic, or ironic in temper, mood, or tone

kfg
Guest
kfg

“So, are you a transgender woman?”

Not by self identification.

theasdgamer
Guest

“IF, in the past, humans were sired by mostly only 20% of the human male population “because 20% are “alpha” and 80% are “beta” Since most societies have had large populations of slaves, that ain’t necessarily so. Betas probably sire half of the offspring in our society. As Blax frequently notes, betas fuck, too. And since they are the ones primarily in LTRs, and kids are mostly produced in the context of LTRs. Science What are the real numbers? Zuck asserts that they’re more in the 1-5% range, with 3.7% being a high-bound figure for one study. This varies by… Read more »

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader

kfg
ou’re old enough to know better, too.”

I’m older than that.

Then you should know even more better.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader

Fred Flange As one who has passing familiarity with prostate cancer treatments (never mind how I know), I’ve certainly not heard of de-Brucing as even part of a cure. Yes in scarier situations with high Gleason scales of 8 or such, T-reduction may be done since that may help slow the spread, with some feminizing side effects, but not like this. Treatment of cancer in 2018 is not necessarily the same as it was in the 80’s and 90’s. Note that many experimental treatments are tried, most of them don’t quite work out as expected. PS: Bruce Jenner is not… Read more »

scribblerg
Guest
scribblerg

Fucking Mineter here again? Are there any standards here?

Centuries
Guest
Centuries

Lesson from History: Transgender Mania is Sign of Cultural Collapse – Camille Paglia

https://youtu.be/I8BRdwgPChQ

scribblerg
Guest
scribblerg

Can’t wade through all the comments, sry…What I saw was not that interesting. @Rollo – This is easily your most powerful essay in a long time imho. But so many men are in denial about the truth of male-female intersexual relations. They are buffering out news they don’t want to face and are ego-invested in anger and victimization and blame. But maybe that’s necessary for them? Some important points to digest, guys. In no particular order. Christianity was the victory of Betadom over Alpha males who had much, much better lives in the days of polygamy and harems and concubines.… Read more »

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader

@NBTM

Not quite sure what you’re getting at. Could you explain in more detail?

PS: Bruce Jenner isn’t a woman.

Centuries
Guest
Centuries

Bruce Reimer wasn’t a woman either

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader

I cannot put the time in right now to re-locate some of the recent genetic studies and foolishly did not bookmark them. It looks like there have been multiple “bottleneck” events in the last 10,000 years in various parts of Eurasia. One that sticks in my head: about 4,500 years ago a dramatic change occurred in what is now Spain and Portugal (Iberian peninsula). The maternal DNA (mtDNA) of modern Iberians shows two different groups of people, while the paternal DNA shows only one. There’s some science parts that get a bit interesting, but tl;dr for now. Conclusion? 4,500 years… Read more »

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader

Big “DUH” moment reading The Red Queen today. I finally worked my way through all the birds, frogs, seals, etc. to the conclusion of Part 1. The author lays out AF-BB and cuckolding ias a female strategy to get the better if not best sperm in clear, obvious language. Not just in mice and birds but humans. Bonus: He also points out that the cult of Courtly Love was at some level all about legit heirs for nobility, and so affording women the opportunity to get their AF from some man other than their husband? Feature, not at all a… Read more »

theasdgamer
Guest

When you have a baby in the house, you realize how much bullshit is out there and real life comes knocking at your door. Watching a baby develop makes you realize that all their development is encoded in them, from kicking when they’re excited to holding their heads up to reaching for things to lifting themselves up on their arms to pulling themselves onto their knees…all preparing for crawling…babies develop crushes so that they know when they recognize someone because the babies feel good when they see that person’s face…babies will stare at the faces of the people holding them… Read more »

stan stucoski
Guest
stan stucoski

I’ve listened to same shit forever….” u only want me for sex”…. . being in a sexless marriage for over 30 yrs……I obviously haven’t come up.with a decent response……luv your stuff…..it’s too late for me…..

palmasailor
Guest
palmasailor

@Stan Stucoski

Why do you think it’s too late for you?

kfg
Guest
kfg

” . . . the cult of Courtly Love was at some level all about legit heirs for nobility . . .” Well, that’s what aristocratic marriages were all about, and thus arranged, on a basis of money and power. ” . . . affording women the opportunity to get their AF from some man other than their husband?” A formalized system of beta orbiting, allowing a married noble woman male courting attention (which she would otherwise never experience) without scandal. The story of Guinevere and Lancelot was a morality tale of what not to do. In any case, it… Read more »

kfg
Guest
kfg

“…..it’s too late for me…..”

SJF
Guest

@AR “….reading The Red Queen today” It’s interesting that some of the summary or reviews of The Red Queen carry lots of Red Pill Awareness. It’s not about denial, anger, bargaining, or depression. If you get out in Mother Nature and observe it’s all right there. Sitting in a tree-stand hunting and watching, while also understanding subconscious or nocturnal behavior with get you to Acceptance “tout de suite”, toot sweet. There’s a meme photo of perhaps Yellowstone out there: “It’s a strange moment….When you realize that the sound of Nature is the sound of millions of animals, birds, and insects… Read more »

O.B.I.T.
Guest
O.B.I.T.

” . . . the cult of Courtney Love was at some level all about legit heirs for nobility . . ”

https://people.com/music/courtney-love-sam-lutfi-restraining-order/

theasdgamer
Guest

” u only want me for sex” of course, because you’re supposedly so good in bed (implying that she’s proud of her sexual prowess and you put her on the defensive about whether or not her sexual moves please you) no, luv, it’s your Ph.D. in physics that got me hooked don’t forget to cook something for me and my friends on game day…and make sure there’s plenty of beer in the fridge (the message here is that she does other stuff to please you) ..and violins…sax and violins… and you only want me for money, which makes you a….[this… Read more »

theasdgamer
Guest

Christianity was the victory of Betadom over Alpha males who had much, much better lives in the days of polygamy and harems and concubines. #Notreally Christianity included men with multiple wives (almost from its inception), but those men weren’t allowed to become church managers (elders) because they were expected to put their energy into managing their wives. Jacob had two wives and two concubines. Abraham knocked up Hagar, Sarah’s slave. There have never been all that many polygamous families in any society–they are outliers. The FI pushed hard on making bigamy a crime. It used the church and other institutions… Read more »

The Silver FoX
Guest
The Silver FoX

If a chick ever says, “You only want me for seX…” the obvious & only response is, “Of course! So get down there, and start sucking, honey. If you do that well, then i’m gonna fuck you real good…”, or something along those lines. Back when i was smashing it (and my mojo is back, so i’m smashing it again), i always seXualized things very quickly. But it was all part of fun play, being cheeky, getting a little rough with a girl i liked, then walking away laughing once i had her attention. I always knew within the first… Read more »

palmasailor
Guest
palmasailor

@fox Congrats on bustin you dry spell 30 years and sexless will be difficult to turn but it can be done. Pragmatically now his best reply now is probably a smirking ‘nah’ then immediately walking out the door with no explanation or contact and finding one who does want sex. Don’t actually leave – just go no contact and find another woman. On this: “You can have him if you want a boy” In jest or not it’s a breach of man code. She was your fucking mark so he should but out. Unless of course he opened the set… Read more »

The Silver FoX
Guest
The Silver FoX

@ Palma Nah, all good, man. We’re top mates, solid as. He always has my back. She knew what he was really doing. He was talking me up, taking the piss like that, that’s why she’s cool. She was working on a stall a couple up from my mate’s kitchen, so had been hanging with the lads a bit in her breaks before i turned up the next day (’cause they know how to party out back without being twats). All good, solid Alpha men. The ladies love them, so it was cool to just rock in the next day… Read more »

theasdgamer
Guest

@Rollo

Some of the young petunias who read your blog don’t know that you have written a book about rearing kids…that being concerned about your progeny is very Red Pill and masculine. There’s lots of crap out there that can end your genetic line–causing daughters and sons to become sterile, etc. Kids need to be taught manners of living to ensure reproduction. Fire and forget is a mass reproduction strategy more suitable for frogs than for people.

Sentient
Guest
Sentient

scribbs There is a reason girls always ingest my ejaculate. Some of them even lick the excess all up, hungrily…It’s the physical manifestation of their desire for my DNA. Nothing more, and nothing less. This here ^^^ +1 For this they deserve to have to degrade themselves with men like me, doing the most depraved things for me and to me while show them videos of other women having sex with me. Well degredation, depravity, etc etc. chastity… Morality… These are Dog Only concepts… Because – see top quote. Women simply cannot act along these lines… It’s not depraved when… Read more »

boulderhead
Guest

LIEBERT

“Currently reading the third book. When your Daddy is a psychopath, he wants you to be that too. Psychopaths are so confused about the world,”

What makes you believe your father is a psychopath? It is important that you understand that what you believe effects you,not him.

“Yet when the physical talents of another person intimidate us and we either hold negative attitudes about that person or engage in verbal combat, we are attempting to rape that person, to deprive him or her of power.”

EhIntellect
Guest

@ ASD Well said. Fire and forget is one ingredient for hell on earth and as much as some guys clutch to freedom from choice, as if that’s possible, the bell still tolls for all. Long life and money and sex and glory and fame and legacy happen in unison with more than bio-evo. Since the bio-evo side of intersexual dynamics is fucked up too, immediate gains are made quickly aligning life with nature. Men don’t naturally fuck plastic robots….but we do it anyways….and some call it a victory vs. the bloated hypergamy (take that FI!)…I’d call it exotifying surrender… Read more »

boulderhead
Guest

“When your dad tells you, “You either go my way or the highway,” it’s like male solipsism.” This is my favorite line to use in my house with the people I am supporting.Solipsism isn’t about ways to do things,it is about what can I get and how can I get it. What are you Johan bringing to the table besides an appetite? In the past most men were told to hit the highway at puberty,things are way to easy now. “He possess an idea of blank slate, he thinks anyone can be anything. And nothing exists out of his mind.”… Read more »

Sentient
Guest
Sentient

Johan

Tuffin up butta cup…

Sentient
Guest
Sentient

Being paralyzed with fear is not being able to handle anything…

EhIntellect
Guest

Boulderhead,

You’ve got Johan all wrong. I think Johan’s lauding his dear old dad. I can’t rightly tell. His dad seems normal enough, like a dad…doing dad things.

Anyways, for the daddy-issued:

https://youtu.be/IuLG6WqjOEo

boulderhead
Guest

Liebert

You need to face your fears,it is the only way out of paralysis. A belief that you can handle any thing is a good start.

EhIntellect

I believe I am reading this right,With Johans permission I will give it to you.

EhIntellect
Guest

“But fear makes me paralyzed, I can’t move,” On fear: Rational fear arises from actual external threats. Example: You’re in a fight and lose ground. That fear demands you make a choice. Fight harder or flight or lie there and take it. Pretty simple. Irrational fear is inactual internal threats. Example: Thinking about beatdowns and not leaving the house. This fear demands nothing but entertaining limitless and mostly worthless fictions. That is the definition of analysis paralysis. Paralysis… Johan, read carefully…you are not living in the actual NOW. You are living in your make-believe psychosomatic irrational fears. Some more: Filial… Read more »

boulderhead
Guest

@Eh

I get what your saying but get this,my dad would kick your dads ass ,mop the floor with it then shoot him in the skull gut and skin him and serve him for breakfast rawr with fava beans.
When he takes his belt of the neighbors start crying and he uses the buckle on us.

EhIntellect
Guest

@ boulderhead

I believe you. He sounds like a nice guy too.

Is your dad still around?

boulderhead
Guest

Eh,yes still chasin skirts too.

EhIntellect
Guest

Too cool. Give him a hug for me.

Sentient
Guest
Sentient

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tnd3tg2H1fc

Well you shoulda seen my Dad…

Sentient
Guest
Sentient

fyi – if you guys want to watch a fairly red pill show, featuring an Alpha (and all the ups and downs that brings) check out Episodes…

Pretty funny too.

j
Guest
j

“if you guys want to watch a fairly red pill show, featuring an Alpha (and all the ups and downs that brings) check out”

Rubriosa:

https://youtu.be/cy16jxL3Po4

3 part series on the life of, former CH Alpha Of The Month recipient, Porfirio Rubirosa (it’s in Espanol tho).

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader

kfg ” . . . the cult of Courtly Love was at some level all about legit heirs for nobility . . .” Well, that’s what aristocratic marriages were all about, and thus arranged, on a basis of money and power. Yes…. ” . . . affording women the opportunity to get their AF from some man other than their husband?” <iA formalized system of beta orbiting, allowing a married noble woman male courting attention (which she would otherwise never experience) without scandal. …no. How to conceal a sneaky Alpha affair? Surround him with earnest Beta orbiters at a tourney,… Read more »

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader

From The Red Queen pp. 247 – 248 Men and women have different bodies. The differences are the direct result of evolution. Women’s bodies were evolved to suit the demands of bearing and rearing children and of gathering plant food. Men’s bodies evolved to suit the demands of rising in a male hierarchy, fighting over women and providing meat to a family. Men and women have different minds. The differences are the direct result of evolution. Women’s minds evolved to suit the demands of bearing and rearing children and gathering plant food. Men’s minds evolved to suit the demands of… Read more »

boulderhead
Guest

“BONUS: Brain research keeps proving the second paragraph to be true, and now the blank-slate girls are reduced to writing ridiculous ‘yes, but’ articles that deliberately obfuscate basic statistics. A rear-guard, defensive action.”

Some people shouldn’t write on their slates. Namely the blank slaters.

Orson
Guest
Orson

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/dec/14/my-life-in-sex-men-love-the-fact-that-im-not-interested-in-commitment

“The way I look at it, one day my looks will have gone – but I will have some delicious memories.”

She is 49 and still thinks her looks haven’t gone…. so deluded.

%d bloggers like this: