A Man in Demand Conference – The Review

encore

On August 7th I made the announcement about the Man In Demand Seminar I’d be speaking at along with Christian McQueen, Tanner Guzy from Masculine Style and Goldmund, whom I’d done the impromptu interview with while he was passing through Reno towards the end of July.

In that blog post’s comments a bit of criticism was leveled at both Christian McQueen and myself for agreeing to speak at this conference and in that discourse I promised readers the following:

I’ll tell you what Joe, I’ll give a personal, honest and objective review of the whole conference when it’s done. I’ll make sure I’m present for all the talks (which I was going to do anyway), and I’ll watch that all the money goes where it’s suppose to go (primarily paying for the venue – it’s spendy even by my standards).

If anything is shady, if anything is off the books, if any of the men who attend want to opine about it, you’ll know and read about it here.

You see, I have always had an open forum; if you want to say you got ripped off, be the first to post it here. Unlike other forums and Disqus threads, I neither edit, censor nor ban any critical opinions. I’ll pull blatant spamming, but the integrity of TRM is based on an open exchange of ideas.

So it’s not my rep on the line, it’s everyone else living up to their own. I have confidence in each of the speakers to deliver what they will. If they don’t, I and anyone else who chooses will let you know.

I don’t do this for a living Joe. If the manosphere shut down tomorrow I’d be making the same scratch I do now.

So here now is my honest and objective assessment of the entire conference.

Before I get into the breakdown of the entire weekend I want to first address that not one speaker at this event made money from it. I wont speak for the guys, but I know how much I spent on a flight, my three days accommodations, my transportation (not cheap in Vegas) while there, my food expenses, my drinks, etc. All this far exceeded the marginal profit (about $330) we each made from our appearances once the venue, insurance and security was paid for.

Christian provided all of us with the financials every step of the way up to and after the event sold out inside of 19 days after we announced it. Christian promptly paid us after the event sold out, a full 3 weeks beforehand. Each admission was $46. Divide that by 4 and each man there payed a mere $11.50 per speaker.

This was Vegas. The venue was everything (and more) than I expected. We wanted it to be affordable since travel and accommodations don’t come cheap. Beyond the basic admission we had a limited 4-person VIP dinner at Sinatra in Wynn’s Encore Casino Resort with the 4 of us for a bargain $98.

That said, everything was above board with Christian, all the speakers and every man who attended.

I put a bit of money out to make this happen, and for me it wasn’t anything concerning, but I know it was a stretch for some of the speakers as well as some of the attendees. I’ve always viewed money as currency. Not in the formal sense that money’s a currency (duh), but rather how money is like a current – as electricity is a current – and an energy with which I can do things.

This event was something I wanted to do. That’s not me trying to be magnanimous, it’s just how I approach things I think are worthwhile. And this seminar was most definitely worth my investment.

The Trip

Here’s a Vegas tip if you’ve never been; practically no one rents a car if you’re flying in. If you get a good one, stay with the same driver. The company I work with usually has me set up, but on this trip I got two good taxi drivers, Allan and his brother Jairo. Get their cell numbers and stay with that guy while you’re out. They appreciate it, and you get info on where cool shit is happening.

I wont bore you with the flight or my first night in town, but suffice to say the room was comfortable as to be expected and conveniently located where I needed to be. My evening was spent reviewing my talk and writing out points on flash cards. I treated myself to a couple of IPAs at the hotel bar and met a very hot bartender named Candace. She was 26 and we promptly got into conversation about her LTR ex-boyfriend, her son and where she was on the Preventive Medicine timeline. I mention her here because I gave her a copy of both my books and she seemed fascinated by them.

The Talk

Jairo dropped me off at our venue at around 8:45 Saturday morning. I was pleased to see the security guard we’d paid for was right in front on the street and immediately directed me to the conference room where I was greeted by Christian and our stunning events hostess (easily an HB 8.5 brunette). I then meet up with Goldmund and Tanner and settled in for the start.

The room was pretty hot at first (air conditioning problems), but our hostess resolved it before Goldmund had got halfway through his talk. I had a few men kind of tentatively look me up and down when I got into the room as if maybe they were wondering if it was me. This was my first public appearance so it was a bit strange for me as well. I was oddly more nervous when I first got into the venue and began having men ask me if I was Rollo Tomassi than when I started my actual talk 5 hours later.

Goldmund

As promised I took a seat in the back of the room and did my due diligence by taking notes on each speaker. Goldmund was first and in all honesty he built his talk up much more than I’d expected. What I knew was that he’d give a recounting of his trans-American trek he did this summer. What surprised me was how in depth he went about how getting out on the road both frees and educates a man about himself.

Nothing causes a man to learn more about himself and teaches self-reliance than putting yourself out in the open with only your wit and perseverance to sustain you. Goldmund’s talk was more than just an adventure guide and some video about the women he met and banged along the way. He made an effort to grow from it, not to mention meet and interact with many manosphere personalities along the way.

I was very impressed with his insights about his trip, but also that he made it accessible for the men who were present, many of whom (myself included) were 10-20 years his senior.

Tanner Guzy

I’ll confess, I wasn’t aware of Tanner and his Masculine Style blog until Christian had mentioned his name as a possible speaker for this conference. I looked him, and at first I thought, well he’s a ‘style guy’ – I was wrong. Both on his site and during his talk Tanner brings not just style advice for men, but presents it in such a succinctly Red Pill way I was forced to rethink a few of my own TRM principles about bearing, physical presence and appearance.

I daresay I learned the most from Tanner of all these talks. Granted, Tanner is a professional style consultant and works directly in men’s fashion, but he doesn’t simply suggest men wear this or that; Tanner explains why men should dress to be impressive and why men should care about their appearances.

It’s easy to quote the 48 Laws of Power about dressing the part to have others consider your status, but it’s important to grasp the Red Pill dynamics that go along with demonstrating our strengths, our status, our accomplishments and why what we wear indicates this.

I should add that during Tanner’s Q&A session (easily as long as my own went) I felt compelled to make the point that guys who hate on other men for being concerned with what they wear was in fact a form of intrasexual combat. Tanner had an example of some of his forum haters telling him “only fags worry about their clothes” and “real men don’t think about fashion”; essentially ‘just be yourself’, be manly, wear jeans and a t-shirt and it’s all good. I made the comment that this type of SMV disqualification is comparable to fat girls telling slightly less fat girls they look OK being fat on FaceBook to hold them in place and hinder any ideas of attempting to improve their SMV.

Christian

Christian’s talk, rather speech, surprised me most. I don’t think I was alone in expecting the Playboy game talk in some manner would be forthcoming from Christian, but I couldn’t have been more wrong. He was well prepared with a speech, he primarily read, and had obviously given a great amount of consideration to.

He began with suicide and divorce statistics and wove these facts into what I can only describe as a call to arms for men in reclaiming their masculinity. If he’d left it there it would’ve made an emotional impact enough (his voice choking with emotion during some moments), but the import of his speech was also about men defining masculinity for themselves in a feminine-centric culture that aligns itself against them from ever unplugging from it.

I’ve come to expect the happy-go-lucky Game proponent with the Rat Pack swagger to be larger than life from my 2 interviews, but Christian dropped that persona for this speech and it made his point for him. Goldmund described it as inspirational and motivational, and I’m thankful for Christian for being that at this event – it’s what was needed to round out the line up.

I should add that my good friend Sam Botta took it upon himself not only to fly out from L.A., but he also brought his MacBook Pro and some pro audio equipment to record me. He warmed up by doing a test run on Christian’s speech and while I don’t know when it’ll be available I think the recording will speak volumes about Christian’s actual maturity and the seriousness he’s capable of. It will surprise many of his critics.

Rollo Tomassi

Well shit, what can I say about myself that wont sound like I’m glossing myself? As I mentioned I was very nervous when I first got to the event in the morning and had men I’d only just met ask me to sign their books and let me know how grateful they were for my work. After a while I felt like I was more among a group of old friends than guys I needed to impress and that nervousness turned into a comfort kind of like speaking to a family gathering.

I’m sure that sounds all touchy-feely, but I don’t know how else to describe it. In between speakers I had men come to me, ask me questions, show me appreciation, tell me their stories about their lives and so on, so it put much more at ease. As the talks went on I saw that there were men attending who were obviously my senior – I’d guess late 50s maybe early 60s – as well as young men in their 20s, and this also put me into a family frame of mind.

I understand that my presence was a big draw for this conference. I’m humbled by that, especially when I have men in the military, men and their sons, men on the Vegas police force and men who’ve seen decades more of a feminine-centric society than I express their gratitude for my writing and ideas.

Still, going last has it’s disadvantages, not the least of which was that I’d taken notes of all the speakers’ talks ahead of mine. My head gets filled with things I think need to be expanded on, areas I thought should be explained better, and this then leads to my mentally rewriting my own talk and trying to jot down things I now want to cover too. I had to make a conscious effort to repress this, but I’m afraid some of it found its way into my talk.

As you might guess, I talked about what I know best and this is the influences of Hypergamy on women, men, society, etc. I didn’t mention it, but I had titled my talk Hypergamy – Micro to Macro the night before and this was my basic outline. I began by defining terms because I didn’t want to presume every guy in the audience was entirely familiar with my interpretations of what Red Pill, Alpha/Beta and Hypergamy mean in my referencing. This turned out better than I thought because it sparked a lot of ideas and later discussions while I was in-speech.

For a while I entertained the idea of simply making my speech an hour long Q&A session since so many men had hit me up with such great questions between talks and I really wanted to go into more detail. Instead I opted for sticking to building up Hypergamy from its evolutionary psychology and biological roots in ovulatory shift behaviors, through the personal and sociological implication. After this I held a Q&A and this really developed into the group discussion I’d hoped it would. So in the end I got a happy compromise and I hope I got to all the questions every man had.

Overview

As I said, Sam Botta was my hero for recording the audio of this. He told me I went on for 133 minutes and I can tell you it seemed to blow by so much faster. I will make that audio available for a reasonably purchasable download once Sam has it mastered in order to be fair with those who attended.

It was an honor to meet so many diverse men who’d also made an effort to make this event worthwhile. And while none of us made money from this I think every man there profited from the experience. I met a father and son, I had lunch with my commenter Rugby, I met commenter Jeremy, a Vegas police detective, a former Marine pilot who told me he would be insisting his sons read my books before they graduated high school, and so many more who I don’t have the space to mention here. Thank you for oming to this.

There were no “leaks” of where the venue was to be held. There were no publicity stunts or pandering to contrived social agendas. There were no bomb threats or feminist protests, and, as promised, no video or photography of our guests. I’m proud to say that this conference was well designed and well executed in a luxurious location with every effort made to ensure the anonymity of the men attending and all with the intent of helping each of us collectively learn and grow in a Red Pill awareness.

The VIP after-dinner at Sinatra was fantastic and some of the best camaraderie I’ve had with men I’d only met in person a few hours prior. The women at Encore were top shelf and the martinis were too.

I should also mention that at Encore I was ‘coined’ by one of our Air Force guests who was stationed in South Korea and was in Vegas for the event. Up until this time I was unaware of the significance of receiving an Air Force coin, but it was the highlight and honor of my weekend.

coin

Things We Could Do Better

Finally, at the end of the seminar we had a group Q&A and bluntly asked everyone what we could do to make a (possible) annual event better. Among these comments were a meet & greet or a group lunch which I thought would be good, but also I’d like to open up the VIP into a larger collective gathering in the evening.

My thoughts would be a larger venue, and of course a longer time frame for registration. Maybe a 2 day event over a long weekend with 6 or so speakers would be ideal.

So with that I want to thank all those who attended one last time here. A Man in Demand was as it should be, a collective experience and a collective discussion and that requires all of us being present and relating.

Goldumnd has a great write up of the event here, and Christian gives his thoughts here too. Also, Tanner had a funny video of his trip to the event here.

If you attended or you have and ideas or comments about this being an annual gathering you’d like to see please let me know in the comment thread. If I missed you or you were one of the guys I met or mentioned in this review please let me know.

Thanks gentlemen.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Published by Rollo Tomassi

Author of The Rational Male and The Rational Male, Preventive Medicine

Speak your mind

389 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Andy
Andy
10 years ago

Perhaps this isn’t clear to some here the way it is to me. You will get Oneitis if you are not spinning plates.

How could you ever catch feelings for a chick after being married? Knowing what you know now. The infatuation always ends, vulnerability is a weakness, love is conditional… I’d be a fucking robot out there.

scribblerg
scribblerg
10 years ago

@Ya – Spot on. But context is also decisive in life. There are many places where you walking in with holed sneakers and a tee shirt is a deficit, like many of the bars and restaurants I spent my evenings in when I was more of a baller in NYC. But here’s the thing. I never wore a suit to impress women – it was part of my job/work uniform. One day I realized that I could project high status and power by wearing very high quality clothing. Same thing with my Tag-Heuer watch (in a draw in my dresser… Read more »

Forge the Sky
Forge the Sky
10 years ago

@YaReally Great stuff man. I get what you’re saying about style, and I recognize it can be a crutch. For a relative novice at game like myself, the IOI’s and warm opens I get when dressed well are a big help. Anything to bust that AA, lol. But to be clear, I dress well mostly for two reasons: 1) Work dress code; and 2) growing up, my family emphasized a minimum standard of dress even around the house was important to show respect to yourself and those around you. So it’s just kinda habit, really. What I’ve tried to do… Read more »

Rollo Tomassi
10 years ago
Forge the Sky
Forge the Sky
10 years ago

Hey Glenn, both I and YaReally have talked about this before, but I’m actually not a huge fan of distant, sparse texting game. I mean, you shouldn’t ever engage more than she is with it, but past that you can be as verbose as you feel like. Most text game advice kinda assumes you’re shitty with words, innuendo, and intuition about these sorts of things cause most guys are. But if you’re good at these things you can use it as a great way to interact with chicks in a novel medium. I like texting with girls occasionally because 1)… Read more »

rugby11ljh
rugby11ljh
10 years ago
Reply to  Forge the Sky

Self surgery After the leaving vegas I have a whole new appreciation of the red pill. Their seems to be about 27% left of me that is still detoxing from blue pill beta righteousness. It’s weird been dressing well and getting great feedback from women. Been treating myself well with hitting the gym. Went back to work with my old trainer who used to be part of the men’s Olympic bobsledding team. My state of being have improved on every human level. I’m way past the troubles of my youth. It’s odd to me the red pill is maturity in… Read more »

matttolliver
10 years ago

I was fortunate to have the time and resources to make it to this conference. I was the pilot Rollo mentioned in this post; I feel if my father was aware of the information in “Preventative Medicine” and didn’t let me know – I’d be royally pissed. After my oldest son read it, and we discussed the book, I noticed a difference in his confidence for the better.

Undoubtedly, I will attend the next conference.

Rollo Tomassi
10 years ago
Reply to  matttolliver

Thanks Matt, we’re already talking about next year.

YaReally
10 years ago

@Jeremy “They shouldn’t be thinking that.” No, they shouldn’t. And the guys who are promoting that view aren’t purposely trying to make them THINK that…BUT that’s how newbies interpret it and that’s what the guys lurking and reading will run off and do. The examples of this are EVERYWHERE, the MISC Forever Aloners are just the most blatant example. They’re guys who’ve been fed the idea that “hey man, looks matter, always have, always will, a 6-pack and being jacked is a sign that you’re a high-value alpha male, so you should try to have that” and they interpret that… Read more »

Rollo Tomassi
10 years ago
Reply to  YaReally

Allow me to rephrase this: A man in a well tailored suit has the same effect for women as lingerie (or something similar) has for men. However if that woman wearing the thong is a landwhale, a tattooed blue haired feminist or an emaciated pale wallflower it serves the opposite purpose. The same is true for men and the suit. Once again I’ll leave this here: http://therationalmale.com/2012/02/23/looks-count/ “Your bulletproof Game and charming personality wont make you look any better when your shirt comes off.” Looks. Assets. Game. Have two. Three is best, but if you only have one, Game is… Read more »

YaReally
10 years ago

How about just a flat-out homeless looking asian bum: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLNmwMAlNY0 How else can we DHV? How about singing? But, dressed like a homeless person? Like I say, value trumps clothes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajNqfvE-2Vk That last guy was pretty studly in the face tho…how about a full out nerd?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6OnbrraIGg But those guys were all pretty tall, so it’s obviously height that matters. ’cause trust me, people judge you on your appearance, and height signifies attractiveness. So here’s some short guys…a BROWN guy and an ASIAN guy too, omg, no suits AND non-white? How could they even have a CHANCE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvBXQsPbQ5w If you… Read more »

Rollo Tomassi
10 years ago
Reply to  YaReally

Well I will grant you this, there’s a reason Lemmy from Motorhead pulls women, and it’s not his stunning good looks. He owns his ‘look’ (tough guy, biker, rockstar), but moreover he DHVs with talent and attitude that delimits his less than ideal physical features.

Lemmy or Gene Simmons can rock an Armani equally as well as what they wear on stage because they DHV in context in both situations.

YaReally
10 years ago

@Rollo “The problem is with people who can only think in absolutes.” I agree. You made the absolute that “A man in a well tailored suit has the same effect for women as lingerie (or something similar) has for men.” and there are TONS of examples from the Brad Pitt t-shirt shit to the vids I’m posting that say that’s inaccurate. Therefore you just can’t make that kind of absolute statement. “However if that woman wearing the thong is a landwhale, a tattooed blue haired feminist or an emaciated pale wallflower it serves the opposite purpose. The same is true… Read more »

Rollo Tomassi
10 years ago
Reply to  YaReally

the reason I can AMOG suit guys at the bar is that most of them don’t have internal value under their suit and it oozes out of every pore the second you put any kind of pressure on them… Granted and I’ve seen this done many times. Clothing isn’t Game, neither is a sole reliance on physique Game. However, you get a guy with good Game, looks and dressed well and put him up against a guy who looks like “just a guy” with the same degree of Game and the guy who looks the part edges out that guy.… Read more »

YaReally
10 years ago

@Rollo “Have two. Three is best, but if you only have one, Game is the most essential.” Also this I agree with. But when you tell a newbie this, their instinct is “well I have money because I don’t go out and I have a job, and I can hit the gym and just buy a tailored suit so I can get looks, and that game shit is full of a bunch of very scary embarrassing social pressure situations, so I’ll just focus on looks and money because I only need two out of these three!” Then they end up… Read more »

keyser Soze
keyser Soze
10 years ago

@yareally ,

You have two men, one is dressed like Tanner (with a good game) and the other is wearing a T-shirt (with a good game).

Who do you think a pussy would look at/talk to first ?

Andy
Andy
10 years ago

@YaReally

Pretty convincing argument there.

kfg
kfg
10 years ago

@keyser Soze:

The one chopping wood.

YaReally
10 years ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64Ixzp94ksw Is there anything “lower value” in terms of externals than a guy who’s stuck in a wheelchair? I mean, he’s crippled, he’s theoretically the worst possible option for genetic bla bla But they know how to get Attraction and the girls hamster rationalize that it’s fine. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7PAYhmoKkA Or a fat dude who clearly isn’t wearing a suit and doesn’t have assets. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4X5OyESGuPc Or a guy who’s 5 feet tall. He can’t do much about his looks, so he should be wearing a suit so he can demonstrate that he hires people to do his manual labor for him bla… Read more »

lh
lh
10 years ago

Convincing argument from YaReally. I’d like to hear an answer from Tanner.

YaReally
10 years ago

@keyser “You have two men, one is dressed like Tanner (with a good game) and the other is wearing a T-shirt (with a good game). Who do you think a pussy would look at/talk to first ?” Whoever has the 0.000001% better game in that exact moment. That’s literally all it comes down to. Whichever guy acts first gets a bonus point but if the other guy’s game is tight and he’s just that 0.000001% sharper, he triggers Hypergamy and the girl’s subconscious takes over and rationalizes the rest from there. Guys hate that it can be boiled down to… Read more »

keyser Soze
keyser Soze
10 years ago

@kfg.

You have to men chopping woods, one using 5 pounds axe (with a good game) and the other using 30 pounds axe(with no games).

Who do you think the Gypsy woman would look at first?

Rollo Tomassi
10 years ago
Reply to  keyser Soze

Two guys, one takes off his shirt and looks like a pudgy Seth Rogen, but he’s funny with Game. The other is ripped like that guy who just won American Ninja Warrior with slightly less Game.

How much do looks compensate for a marginal lack of Game?

I get this all the time BTW.

kfg
kfg
10 years ago

@keyser Soze:

The one whose wallet will be easiest to lift.

@Rollo: “Lemmy from Motorhead pulls women, and it’s not his stunning good looks.”

He ain’t no pretty boy, but he sure as shit looks like a man.

keyser Soze
keyser Soze
10 years ago

Two men, one is wearing a T-shirt and a blazer (with zero game), the other is wearing a T-shirt and no blazer (with no game either) .they are both average looking.

Who do you think a pussy would look at first?.

Ps,
Please no 000000.1. Just a simple answer.

Rollo Tomassi
10 years ago
Reply to  keyser Soze

Maybe this is a better question: Those same two guys (Seth Rogan and Ninja Warrior) are at a club hanging out.

Knowing nothing about either’s Game and without saying a word, which guy gets IOIs from women in the club? Which guy has an easier go of applying his Game? IOW who has to work harder because of appearances and the judgements that Tanner addresses?

YaReally
10 years ago

@Rollo “Lemmy or Gene Simmons can rock an Armani equally as well as what they wear on stage because they DHV in context in both situations.” Exactly my point. Saying the suit is like lingerie implies that not wearing a suit is like a girl NOT wearing lingerie which implies she’s less “attractive”. But that’s not the case. Lemmy and Gene Simmons are attractive regardless of what they wear because they DHV. Like I say when you have something that gets inconsistent results (some guys in suits are not attractive to women, some are, some guys in t-shirts and dirty… Read more »

YaReally
10 years ago

@keyser “You have to men chopping woods, one using 5 pounds axe (with a good game) and the other using 30 pounds axe(with no games). Who do you think the Gypsy woman would look at first?” “Two men, one is wearing a T-shirt and a blazer (with zero game), the other is wearing a T-shirt and no blazer (with no game either) .they are both average looking. Who do you think a pussy would look at first?.” Same answer as before. Who she looks at is irrelevant. Who she FUCKS is the guy with 0.00001% better game who’s actually interacting… Read more »

Rollo Tomassi
10 years ago
Reply to  YaReally

One more Devil’s advocate and I’m done:

Which one of those types of guys (Seth or Ninja) does your average woman fantasize about when she’s got the pocket rocket buzzing away on her clit during the proliferative phase of her ovulatory cycle?

Ladies, feel free to opine. 🙂

kfg
kfg
10 years ago

@Keyser Soze:

The one who doesn’t remind her of an “asshole” ex, although she’ll bare a bias against the guy in the blazer. He’s obviously retarded. Blazers are for plowing, not chopping wood.

YaReally
10 years ago

@Rollo “However, you get a guy with good Game, looks and dressed well and put him up against a guy who looks like “just a guy” with the same degree of Game and the guy who looks the part edges out that guy.” This is theoretically how it’s SUPPOSED to work, logically. But it comes down to that 0.00001% of who’s game is tighter. There’s never two guys with the exact same level of game. In any interaction one person is ALWAYS reacting to the other person, whether it’s 10:90 or 49.9999:50.0001. One person reacting to the other person is… Read more »

kfg
kfg
10 years ago

@YaReally: “Who she looks at is irrelevant. Who she FUCKS is the guy . . . ”

And this where the guys who do studies on sexual preferences based on dating site profiles go completely off the fucking rails.

@Rollo:

comment image

Andy
Andy
10 years ago

Game > looks > style > assets?

Jeremy
Jeremy
10 years ago

@YaReally …BUT that’s how newbies interpret it and that’s what the guys lurking and reading will run off and do. I think that’s presumptuous. How many guys have absolutely shit hygiene and wardrobe? From my point of view that number is a large percentage of the (at least American) population. Those guys need to hear that taking care of yourself and dressing cleanly and appropriately is something they should be doing. They need to hear that going out and spending some thought on how you look to other people is not wasted energy. But it’s IRRELEVANT, is my point. It’s… Read more »

YaReally
10 years ago

@Rollo “Two guys, one takes off his shirt and looks like a pudgy Seth Rogen, but he’s funny with Game. The other is ripped like that guy who just won American Ninja Warrior with slightly less Game.” As the hairy-backed beer-belly guy who’s gone to pool parties with dudes who are infinitely better looking than him with less game, the pudgy Seth Rogan generally takes it. I have a buddy who’s 5’2″ and a Natural (he did a very social job for a lot of years) and girls don’t even LOOK at me even when I’m trying to talk, once… Read more »

keyser Soze
keyser Soze
10 years ago

Rollo.
Two men, one is dressed in a suit (with a good game), the other is like Arnold in a T-shirt (with no game).

ARNOLD is fucking .

kfg
kfg
10 years ago

@YaReally: “Has NO ONE been to a party where the coolest guy that the girls all like ISN’T a 6’4″ chisled-jaw doctor with a 6-pack?”

Every party I’ve ever been to.

keyser Soze
keyser Soze
10 years ago

I thought we were talking about men’s style! What went wrong ?.

Jeremy
Jeremy
10 years ago

@kfg

Hey man, don’t sell yourself short, that growth spurt will come.

*** That’s just a friendly joke!

kfg
kfg
10 years ago

@Kesery Soze:

Arnold is the one that every girl in the room pays attention to. I wouldn’t put a good deal of money on his being the one doing the fucking at the end of the night.

Rollo’s question and my graphic answer to it were about fantasy. People sometimes manage to differentiate between reality and fantasy. That’s why you don’t see a lot of guys who think that Aragorn is cool lining up to be mercs in the Congo.

kfg
kfg
10 years ago

@Jeremy:

I’m the Audrey Hepburn of men, you insensitive clod.

Jeremy
Jeremy
10 years ago

@keyser Soze

I thought we were talking about men’s style! What went wrong ?

YaReally brought data in contradiction to things we were saying, that’s what.

Rollo Tomassi
10 years ago
Reply to  Jeremy

Apparently I’d make more money promoting an all male stripper revue show if the guys had the bodies like Seth Rogan but had confidence and made the ladies laugh.

YaReally
10 years ago

@rollo “Maybe this is a better question: Those same two guys (Seth Rogan and Ninja Warrior) are at a club hanging out. ” lol like I say I’ve wung with guys way better looking than me. My main wingman for a few years was a 6’4″ externally high-value alpha ripped MMA dude who was a Natural (he #-closed me to roll out together because when we met I was able to keep up with him his other buddies can’t). So I’ve been the Seth Rogan to Ninja Warriors. “Knowing nothing about either’s Game and without saying a word, which guy… Read more »

Andy
Andy
10 years ago

I’ve got it.

Tingle Quotient = (looks + style + assets + 1) * game

kfg
kfg
10 years ago

@Rollo: You put together a revue of stripping caber tossers and I’ll put my money behind it, but strip shows are manipulating people’s fantasies for financial gain.

If you want to make money off of actual fucking, I think a chicken ranch would be the better ticket.

Andy
Andy
10 years ago

Actually

Tingle Quotient = (looks + style + assets + 1) * game^2

haha

keyser Soze
keyser Soze
10 years ago

Two Arnolds, both dressed in suits, the one with a better game get the pussy.

Two Arnolds, one in a suit(he gets the first look by the Pussy, triggers provisions or AF) and one is not.
The one with better game get the Pussy.

Ps,
I could go on forever about “two men”.
Pussy confusion vs dick confusion.

Jeremy
Jeremy
10 years ago

I think the exponent on game should be fractional, something like (3/2). That way if your game is less than 1, you suffer.

Jeremy
Jeremy
10 years ago

err, rather, you don’t suffer rather.

Andy
Andy
10 years ago

“That way if your game is less than 1, you suffer.”

Yeah, 0*0 is 0
.5 * .5 = .25
which means everything else means nothing unless you have some game. Shit’s about to get nerdy.

DandyDude
DandyDude
10 years ago

This whole “looks don’t matter” argument reminds me of when I was younger and played fighting games online. Every now and then, some guy would come along and start arguing that gamepads could be just as good as proper joysticks. Then all the older guys would thrash the dude and show lots of evidence that joysticks are superior for fighting games. In the end, the complainer’s argument would devolve into “but if a guy works hard enough at it, he can be just as effective with the gamepad”, without the dude realizing that his argument is based on the very… Read more »

Andy
Andy
10 years ago

“err, rather, you don’t suffer rather.”

I see what you’re saying. We’ll assume whole numbers for all those.

YaReally
10 years ago

@kfg “And this where the guys who do studies on sexual preferences based on dating site profiles go completely off the fucking rails.” Yup. Like, according to shit like “who would you date ladies? Post your opinions :)” half my buddies SHOULDN’T be getting laid. Tyler shouldn’t be able to get Attraction. No girl is like “I want a 5’7″ balding ginger midget with a nasally voice and effeminate weird asperger mannerisms” when you ask her, but there’s a shitload of in-field footage of it happening. Because girls live in the moment. It’s weird to me that this is even… Read more »

keyser Soze
keyser Soze
10 years ago

It is, her ovulatory cycle.
I think when you dress in Armani suit and you look like a million bucks=provision.

I recommend not to wear a T-shirt/shorts/running shoes or flip-flop or sandals.

YaReally
10 years ago

@DandyDude And my point is that this WILL damage guys. I see it all the time with intermediate guys hitting that wall where their internals are just shaky and weak because they followed the easy quick validation path. As awesome as these guys all are when they’re ripped with a 6-pack at 25 with a great job, there’s a chance they may at some point in their 30s maybe after an LTR blows up in their face, not have the same looks, or as much money, or have put on a few pounds, or see wrinkles on their face or… Read more »

YaReally
10 years ago

@keyser ” I think when you dress in Armani suit and you look like a million bucks=provision. ” There’s also this aspect but my posts are long enough that I haven’t gotten into it but very briefly: on top of the potential internal damage these beliefs have, coming off as TOO well-off can put you into the Provider category where she was GOING to fuck you that night till she realized you’re loaded and a great catch and now she wants to make you wait a month to fuck you. Lots of too-externally-high-value dudes have this problem and it blindsides… Read more »

keyser Soze
keyser Soze
10 years ago

Yareally
“You and I both know women don’t go to strip clubs to actually be turned on. They go for a laugh and state boosts. They’re not there like “ohhhh yaaa” leaning back leering like a creepy old man. They’re there with a bunch of girlfriends having a lolz-party.”

Some women do fuck the male strippers.
The vast majority of women who go to male strip clubs are Ugly.

I personally knew a male Stripper who fucked 90% of ugly women who use to be his “clients”.
You are dead wrong.

Rollo Tomassi
10 years ago
Reply to  keyser Soze

You and I both know women don’t go to strip clubs to actually be turned on. Hmm,…then by that logic I suppose I should expect my 2016 calendar of Seth Rogan and Jonah Hill lookalikes (shirtless and in their tighty-whiteys) to outsell the ‘Hawt Firemen’ calendars with the ladies this year. I only think I disagree with you on certain aspects by order of degrees on this YaReally, and you know I endorse you, but I’ve also promoted shows like Thunder from Down Under for years now too. Trust me, the women (and they’re a broad demographic) got to these… Read more »

Jeremy
Jeremy
10 years ago

@YaReally Those videos I posted of guys pretending to be homeless were all daygame… No, I’m not pretending those videos don’t exist. Those videos are of guys getting numbers from girls, not getting laid while fat or in a wheelchair. It’s not the same thing. Girls will give you a number to get rid of you, and they’ll often do it politely. Those videos do not prove that game innately overcomes being fat, ugly, and dressed like a homeless man. I agree they are contradicting evidence to the notion that a suit is “as effective” as lingerie, but contrary evidence… Read more »

Forge the Sky
Forge the Sky
10 years ago

I used to chop wood, sometimes shirtless, for bonfire parties. The girls would watch and ask questions, and I had to teach a few how to do it. Never knew that many girls were so fascinated in learning, lol.

They had shitty form though. More hyperlordosis in the crowd than a Chiropractor’s waiting room.

Sun Wukong
10 years ago

@YaReally I see where you’re coming from, but I also see where Rollo is coming from. There’s no reason you shouldn’t leverage every tool available to you, be it looks, style, money, Game, or whatever. Shying away from one because you’re afraid of becoming to dependent on the other (or you’re afraid of doing the work for it) is purposely denying yourself the opportunity to increase your chances to get what you want. As for style (or anything else, for that matter) becoming a crutch, bro early on I’m gonna be honest: I fucking need one. I can’t find a… Read more »

YaReally
10 years ago

@keyser “Some women do fuck the male strippers. The vast majority of women who go to male strip clubs are Ugly. I personally knew a male Stripper who fucked 90% of ugly women who use to be his “clients”.” …I mean. I assume we’re talking about fucking hot girls here lol Did I have to specify that? “Girls will give you a number to get rid of you, and they’ll often do it politely.” If you can’t see the legit attraction being sparked in a lot of those interactions I don’t know what to tell ya. “Those videos do not… Read more »

Badpainter
10 years ago

YaReally – “Has NO ONE been to a party where the coolest guy that the girls all like ISN’T a 6’4″ chisled-jaw doctor with a 6-pack???”

I’ve never actually seen the “6’4″ chisled-jaw doctor with a 6-pack”, or any variation there of, where he was the coolest guy at the party, and all the girls liked him.

Jeremy
Jeremy
10 years ago

@YaReally I would put money on Patrice O’Neal fucking a girl over any dude with a 6-pack who goes up against him, because he has internal confidence and understands women and has epic game that cuts right to their subconscious brains. Ok, now you’re venturing into hyperbole. I probably have less than half the experience with women you do and I know that that just isn’t true. I’ve discussed preference with women who were being open and honest with me (because I was no threat) and without fail they say that sometimes the appearance of the dude is just a… Read more »

Sun Wukong
10 years ago

I like to think that I could beat out Patrice now, but then I’d also like to think I could beat out most (if not all) corpses.

keyser Soze
keyser Soze
10 years ago

Yareally. “…I mean. I assume we’re talking about fucking hot girls here lol Did I have to specify that?”

You started to sound like a used cars sales man.

Do you really think that vast majority of women who go to male strip clubs are HB 9 or 10 or 8s ?

Forge the Sky
Forge the Sky
10 years ago

I don’t think anyone is disagreeing that game is primary, and should be the matter of first attention (the only caveat being Rollo’s assertion that the red pill should be absorbed before really hitting game so as to avoid a ‘dream girls and children with dynamite’ scenario – and I’m not sure anyone’s disagreeing with that either). The question is, do looks/style matter at all? I would contend that they do. YaReally is pointing out that, with the right game, pretty much any sort of looks cease to make a difference. He backs it up well, so even though it’s… Read more »

Forge the Sky
Forge the Sky
10 years ago

@Sun

You underestimate how much chicks dig dead guys. Have you never heard of ‘Twilight?’

Forge the Sky
Forge the Sky
10 years ago

@kfg

“I’m the Audrey Hepburn of men, you insensitive clod.”

5’7”, cute face? Damn your game must be tight.

Sun Wukong
10 years ago

@Forge

comment image

#JustSayin

teddj4g
teddj4g
10 years ago

I can’t say I experience oneitis the way I did for my ex with my current wife. Yes, I’m certainly fond of her since I sex her up often. Yes I’m certainly invested both legally and financially. Yes I’m emotionally attached to her. That’s the part where I always say if shit goes south it will hurt, but I’ll live. The hurt part is dealing with the attachment. But, oneitis no longer prevents me from putting my interests first. It no longer pushes me to self sacrifice to make her “happy”. I know beyond all doubt that if I had… Read more »

Jeremy
Jeremy
10 years ago

Once she goes black…

kfg
kfg
10 years ago

“I agree they are contradicting evidence to the notion that a suit is “as effective” as lingerie . . . ” . . . but I note that several guys here have noted that lingerie doesn’t do it for them. Within that context I have no real problem with Rollo’s statement, or YaReally’s rebuttal either. And I think we’ve gone beyond beating a dead horse and are about to embark on feeding its remains into a mass spectrometer while arguing about whether it ever really was a horse in the first place. We’re talking about women’s feels here, I’m not… Read more »

keyser Soze
keyser Soze
10 years ago

Boys, here is my advice.
Do NOT wear a T-shirt unless with a blazer.
Do NOT wear a running shoes unless you are running a marathon.
Do NOT wear cycling clothing unless you are Lance Armstrong.
Do NOT wear an Armani suit unless you drive a Mercedes-Benz. (I wouldn’t buy either. It is a sign of provision).
Dress in a conservative sharp style.
You have to be able to distinguish between the dominant look and the T-shirt look.

rugby11ljh
rugby11ljh
10 years ago
Reply to  keyser Soze

@kfg
“I’m the Audrey Hepburn of men, you insensitive clod.”

Ahahaha

@Sun Wukong
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=V3QGGLaglck

@Yareally
Thank you

Jeremy
Jeremy
10 years ago
kfg
kfg
10 years ago

@Jeremy: “5’7”, cute face?” Of men, of men. 6″ wrists. Most of the men in my family are over 6′, so by the time I stopped growing I had made it to average height, but I never filled out. I have the skeleton of a malnourished 14 year old boy. Getting back to YaReally talking about how you present yourself though, it is common for people to overestimate my weight by a good 20 lbs. It seems I take up more mind space than physical space. On the plus side, none of the big guys in my family can borrow… Read more »

Forge the Sky
Forge the Sky
10 years ago

Ok, I read some of the comments again and i think I mischaracterized YaReally’s position a bit. He’s not really saying that looks don’t matter at all (though he likely thinks they matter less than most of the rest of us – I only very slightly would change the balance myself). He’s saying that the boost you can get from looks is actually a bad thing to have because strength there fosters weakness elsewhere. On the face of it, it’s a kinda strange-sounding argument – like saying if you’re a baker and you aren’t growing your own wheat and making… Read more »

YaReally
10 years ago

@Sun Wukong “I see where you’re coming from, but I also see where Rollo is coming from. There’s no reason you shouldn’t leverage every tool available to you, be it looks, style, money, Game, or whatever.” I agree, but my point is, and I don’t know if I’m not making this clear or what but I don’t know any other way to say it: Looks, style and money are all PASSIVE game attributes. They’re EASY to obtain because you don’t have to put your ego through the absolute nightmare that is risking public humiliation in the “trying to replicate” department.… Read more »

keyser Soze
keyser Soze
10 years ago

Yareally is going to change his mind about T-shirts when he reaches late 30s/40s.

A man with big muscles hiding them by wearing a blazer is similar to a woman wearing lingerie.

keyser Soze
keyser Soze
10 years ago

Yareally.

I don’t know (yes I know) why you think all tall men who dress nice or all men with masculine bodies have no game, and I don’t know (yes I know) why you think all wealthy men have no game.
Big fish in a small pond?

YaReally
10 years ago

@Forge the Sky “He’s not really saying that looks don’t matter at all (though he likely thinks they matter less than most of the rest of us – I only very slightly would change the balance myself).” I would say this is a decent summary of my position. External attributes are given FAR too much weight in the Manosphere/TRP. I attribute that to most of the Manosphere/TRP members being guys who are Naturals who have a hard time relating to value-based discussions because most of their reference experience has involved having a lot of external value (like playing in a… Read more »

YaReally
10 years ago

@Rollo I missed the part where a guy with game came up and started talking to the girl and trying to mack her before she got in the car, could you point out the timestamp for that? …’cause I’m pretty sure I said a number of times that a guy with external attributes will do just fine as long as no one interferes and he has a full green light to the bedroom. Do you think the girls in this video are showing legit attraction to him, or are they showing attraction to “being able to take a cool selfie… Read more »

Rollo Tomassi
10 years ago
Reply to  YaReally

And I rephrased that statement. I still think that it’s contextual and subject to the particular woman. As I stated before, no woman fantasizes about a pudgy, pasty men when they masturbate, they imagine Chris Hemsworth plowing them to glory and if you look at the stats of what kinds of porn women primarily watch it will overwhelmingly back that up. Women simply don’t fantasize about a Danny DeVito spitting good Game or making them laugh when they get off. If you’re on the beach, at a pool party, etc. and the guy next to you has comparable or marginally… Read more »

Andy
Andy
10 years ago

I agree, but my point is, and I don’t know if I’m not making this clear or what but I don’t know any other way to say it:

Tingle Quotient = (looks + style + assets + 1) * game^2

This! Someone give me some love here. You can write for days or you can just write this. We’ve solved the iron law of tingles right here. For fuck sake someone contact the Nobel committee.

You’re welcome universe.

kfg
kfg
10 years ago

” . . . it’s contextual and subject to the particular woman. ”

There ya go.

benfromtexas
benfromtexas
10 years ago

I think the bathrobe look would convey a Greek/Roman hedonist vibe. Whenever I would wear mine a girl I used to date said it turned her on. She LOVED it. A lot of women I’ve dated have. It’s always the same reaction. It’s like saying you are sexually accessible and can literally “rip” the clothing right off of your body. Plus I wear it right after a shower, so the girls know you’ve “freshened” up, like women who take whore baths before you screw them.

Rollo Tomassi
10 years ago
Reply to  benfromtexas

@YaReally, here’s another question: The founding fathers of PUA, Mystery, Style and the project Hollywood crew were well known for their club attire (elevator boots, top hat, guyliner and black nail polish). Mystery has gone into great detail about the dynamic of peacocking and his appearance and style were obviously an important part of his Game, at least for some part of it. Even his now toned down look still evokes a message about him. How does that fit into what you’ve been saying here today? I understand that his Game is (or was) possibly so adept that it didn’t… Read more »

keyser Soze
keyser Soze
10 years ago

I believe I have a 0.00000000.0.0.0.0.01 margin of stealing George’s Clooney’s wife.

Forge the Sky
Forge the Sky
10 years ago

Haha, never thought I’d see this tussle. Rollo, I don’t see YaReally as being in contradiction to anything you’re saying. It looks like most of his point is to bring up some interesting ways getting girls using looks/external status/money can backfire, and to emphasize how easy it is for a lot of men to rationalize themselves out of getting game. It all seems to account for the things you’re bringing up pretty well. Like I said before, I’d probably lean slightly towards giving looks/external status/money more weight, but I’ve generally had looks and social proof on my side in my… Read more »

Forge the Sky
Forge the Sky
10 years ago

lol well some of what I said got addressed in the meantime (had to go eat in the middle of writing it), good show guys

@Andy

It’s a great way to conceptualize/demonstrate these ideas quickly and abstractly to guys. I’ve heard looks described as a ‘force multiplier’ for game before, and your formula reflects that.

kfg
kfg
10 years ago

“I think the bathrobe look would convey a Greek/Roman hedonist vibe.”

In college I used to wear yukata around the dorms (in Ontario and NY). This was back when anime was still called Japanimation and consisted of Astro Boy and Speed Racer. Weeaboos didn’t exist yet. In fact Japan and things Japanese were still looked at as a bit questionable, at best.

It conveyed a vibe which garnered more than its fair share of interest. I’m not sure how it would fly today. You might just get yourself labelled as a weeaboo.

keyser Soze
keyser Soze
10 years ago

Rollo “Women simply don’t fantasize about a Danny DeVito spitting good Game or making them laugh when they get off. If you’re on the beach, at a pool party, etc. and the guy next to you has comparable or marginally worse Game than you, but he looks like Mathew McConaughey and you look like Jonah Hill it’s far more likely that a woman will be too distracted by her physical arousal towards him than to pay attention to you or your approach.” And the same thing when women go to male strip clubs, they go there for the fantasy/ tingle… Read more »

Andy
Andy
10 years ago

I am buying yaReally’s argument here, but I think Rollo’s suit vs. lingerie analogy works where there’s already some sort of a relationship (fb, plate, ltr) given u don’t where a suit everyday.

Andy
Andy
10 years ago

Sorry, wear. Given you don’t wear a suit every day.

keyser Soze
keyser Soze
10 years ago

@Rollo.
I have to agree with you on lingerie and suites.

It is the male gigolo or male prostitutes , the male strip clubs and all the masculine clothing the male strippers wear .
Women do want men to dress up in a masculine clothes.

YaReally
10 years ago

@Rollo “I still think that it’s contextual and subject to the particular woman.” I agree, that’s my point. The statement you made was an absolute, even in your rephrasing of it you imply that an attractive man is more attractive in a suit than not and I disagree with that. James Dean in a dirty sweaty t-shirt smoking a cigarette is going to get snubbed by girls when James Dean in a suit is around? Girls didn’t want to fuck John Mclaine in Die Hard running around in his grubby wifebeater, they fantasized about Bruce Willis on the red carpet… Read more »

Rollo Tomassi
10 years ago
Reply to  YaReally

@YaReally, this is Siirtyrion’s blog:
https://sirtyrionlannister.wordpress.com/

He’s the epitome of anti-Game. I’d be interested in your thoughts.

SJF
SJF
10 years ago

Yareally and all the commenters. Great discussion. Thank you, Yareally, for the counterpoints and the pushback. It advances the discussion and it is engaging for sure. Game is key and a man’s job is never finished in learning and applying game. Ever since I read Strauss’ book 12 years or so ago I never didn’t think for a minute that everything matters in a man’s sexual strategy. Everything matters. Every minor point and strategy. Your stuff is gold. And I say that as a married monogamous man for the last 25 years. And it matters. Keep it up. And as… Read more »

Softek
Softek
10 years ago

“Women will gladly fuck a guy with preference if he’s physically ‘hawt’ and rationalize his social ineptitudes away as a cute quirkiness. Many men have seen exactly this happen; looks forgive a multitude of Game sins.” I’ve experienced this. On the other hand, having NO Game before, I had no capacity to capitalize on women’s visceral attraction to me. I had no confidence and no assertiveness. Certainly not enough to look a girl in the eye, joke around with her, nonchalantly put my hand on her thigh or my arm around her shoulders and escalate to the point of actually… Read more »

keyser Soze
keyser Soze
10 years ago

My goodness. Games are for men who weren’t as lucky as the natural good looking alphas. A good looking man need ZERO, ZERO, ZERO game to get approached by pussy. It is the pussy who approaches a very good looking man, nature had bestowed upon him the reason for wetness without him saying a single word. If I had a body like (younger)Arnold and the face of (younger) Marlon Brando, I wouldn’t want to learn a thing about the manosphere. Yes, that is the nature of pussy, they would get wet, aggressive and wanting to fuck good looking tall muscular… Read more »

YaReally
10 years ago

Quick follow-up note on MM while I wait on my buddy: Mystery basically realized “ok I have no value compared to these other guys, I’m just some nerd who can’t get laid” and backwards engineered a set of consistent principles and ways to efficiently trigger them in an optimal order to front-load all his value. It’s not that he’s more ATTRACTIVE in a fuzzy hat that the guy in the suit beside him is invisible, it’s that he’s such a fucking spectacle that he knows girls will HAVE to focus on him. And he knows that girls live in the… Read more »

Softek
Softek
10 years ago

As far as Game goes, it really is about Zen. The Everyday Mind. There’s a LOT to learn. I’ve completely changed my looks. Completely changed my behavior. Completely changed my perception and understanding of women and sexual relationships. At first the changes feel abnormal. It’s challenging. It feels unnatural. But after a while, the new you that you’ve transformed into feels completely natural. There is no “Game.” There is no worrying about “Alpha” or “Beta” or “Looks” or “Assets.” You’re just the man that you are now. And that’s all there is to it. I just set up a date… Read more »

kfg
kfg
10 years ago

” I’m wondering if maybe that was meant to be in the original quote and we all just have disconnected wires . . .”

It was implied in the original, because . . .

” The statement you made was an absolute . . .”

This is not correct. The statement he made related the effect of suits and lingerie, but made no statement as to what that effect actually was. That he left open for discussion.

kfg
kfg
10 years ago

@Softek:

“Before I had studied Chan (Zen) for thirty years, I saw mountains as mountains, and rivers as rivers. When I arrived at a more intimate knowledge, I came to the point where I saw that mountains are not mountains, and rivers are not rivers. But now that I have got its very substance I am at rest. For it’s just that I see mountains once again as mountains, and rivers once again as rivers.”

-Qingyuan Weixin, 9th Century; translated by D.T. Suzuki

keyser Soze
keyser Soze
10 years ago

Very gracious of you, great comment , I hope he’s is okay.

Softek
Softek
10 years ago

@ YaReally I’ve learned a lot from fucking up. Major approach anxiety = focusing on not fucking up. Performance anxiety = focusing on not fucking up. Thinking of what’s cool to say. What would work. What’ll she think? What’ll she like? What won’t she think? What’s going to get her interested? What’s going to turn her off? What’s going to turn her on? When you’re in that mindset, you’re fucked before you even start. In martial arts, this is like focusing on what you think the person is going to do in a match, instead of actually reacting to what… Read more »

Softek
Softek
10 years ago

@ kfg Thanks for the quote, that’s great. @ YaReally Great comments, thanks for sharing. Completely agree about Game being a flowing state. It reminds me of my friend who said how bored he got of knockout women he’d been with. Perfect face, perfect ass, perfect tits, perfect pussy….but not entertaining. Women that were just pump and dumps for him. Out of the some 1100 women he was with, he only entertained LTRs with three. One being his ex-wife. I can also see what Rollo’s saying. Knowing some women’s histories helped me out a lot. It’s like…holy shit. It’s nice… Read more »

Ishamael
10 years ago

@Yareally Glad you post here man. This is good shit for me. I easily fall into the mindset of endlessly trying to improve my body/style/whatever and the bad thing about it is I start to assume I need X (better clothes, bigger arms, etc.) before I can even play the game. For a guy who never had much confidence (or experience) with girls this attitude ends up being like a never ending groundhog day of believing you don’t have what it takes, so you never bother to try getting better at the one thing you could really improve on daily… Read more »

keyser Soze
keyser Soze
10 years ago

Ishmael ” This is good shit for me.”.

What the fuck Is this eh!
When the fuck you little boys are going to grow up and talk like men?

What is it you don’t get?
Do you REALLY think little sluts like a man saying : this is good shit for me?

Those little sluts are LAUGHING at your boyish pathetic words , “this is good shit for me”? How about I say : this is good boogers for me eh!.

Vitriol
Vitriol
10 years ago

@Softek “Women certainly can love intensely. Very intensely. And genuinely. The problem is it only lasts about as long as a toddler’s attention span. It can be genuine for a day and then gone the next. Being ready for that and being aware of that reality has been a key for me maintaining my emotional stability.” I’m glad you pointed this out because it’s very important and can really be a mindfuck for a lot of guys when they understand all the implications of this line of thought. Think about what a wife feels towards her dutiful husband, how the… Read more »

Ishamael
10 years ago

@keyser

lol. Have you ever had a a real male friend?

idgaf what your “little sluts” are thinking. I’ve got better things to do with my time than to try to cater to their tender sensibilities.

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

389
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x