Dominance

Dominance

I’ve been watching with some interest the proceedings of the Ariel Castro kidnapping case. As more of the details come to light and the media aggrandizes the victims (virtually insuring a book or TV deal), there’s a lot of uncomfortable questions that need to be answered.

“Most of the sex that went on in that house, probably all of it, was consensual,” Castro said. “These allegations about being forceful on them — that is totally wrong. Because there was times where they’d even ask me for sex –many times. And I learned that these girls were not virgins. From their testimony to me, they had multiple partners before me, all three of them.”

I covered this a bit in He’s Special, making modern comparisons to the War Brides:

,..there’s been a lot of discussion on the forums I frequent about  Michelle Knight, Amanda Berry and Gina DeJesus being held captive by Ariel Castro for a decade. Let that sink in a minute, a decade. That’s 11 years. That’s a lot of life to live. That’s a lot of normal to get used to. There are other cases like this; Jaycee Dugard and  Elizabeth Smart come to mind, but are all of these instances the results of a hard-wired Stockholm Syndrome in women?

Just for the record here, I wouldn’t dream of trying to defend Castro, but in eleven years time a lot can become normal. I have no doubt that Castro held these women captive for 11 years, and the media would have us believe they endured sex dungeon conditions living like the Gimp in Pulp Fiction, but there comes a point of normalcy in ones daily routine life.


“I am not a violent person. I simply kept them there without being able to leave.”

“We had a lot of harmony going on in that home,” he said.

In our lives there is a certain degree of routine and structure most people become accustomed to. I get up at 5am most mornings, I’m at the gym until 7:30 and I’m off to work until 5pm. Somethings change every day but I live in a set of patterns and I know what to expect most of the time. The more I read about Castro the more I’m thinking the guy settled into a state of normalcy with these women and they with him. In 11 years they made no reasonable dramatic effort to escape? They endured a forced abortion and a homebirth (not unlike Jaycee Dugard) and still no collaborative plan they could come up with was effective for 11 years until one day Ariel left the door open? None of these girls were malnourished, and they could stand to lose some weight.

Naturally the feminine-primary meme is that Castro was “blaming the victim“, but I don’t think that was his point. He knows he’s going to prison for life plus 1,000 years, why not just shut up and go away? There was something of a normal life that became a routine for them all for 11 years. That’s 11 Christmases, 11 Easters, 11 independence days. The MSM will spin the story of their heroic support of each other and I don’t imagine the girls wanted to be there, but at some point living with Ariel was their ‘normal’.

Ariel, got sloppy. He got comfortable in that normalcy. Even if he was abusive, after 11 years my guess is he expected for that normalcy to continue and this was what his plea was really about. He actually thought they “had a lot of harmony going on in that house.” It’s easy to pass off his words as insanity, but here was a guy who at least wanted ‘harmony’. At the end of it all, all he wanted was what most men want – his means were evil and reprehensible, but wanted harmony.

Domination

A week back CH had a study and post regarding the importance of dominance and how it’s ultimately dominance that attracts women to men. Of course Roissy would like for looks to play a lesser role in attraction, and my perspective is that arousal is based on the physical to a much greater importance than women can afford to let on, but dominance is a key factor in attraction. I would also argue that an elite physique is the most obvious environmental cue for male dominance. The best form of peacocking is a good build.

However, all of that breaks down if the guy lacks a dominant Alpha mindset. Without that self-confidence and competitive spirit, the best looking guy becomes a foil for a more dominant one. Conversely, enough bravado and fearless genuine Alpha dominance can make even the ugliest of guys attractive by order of degree.

Ariel Castro was one ugly motherfucker, my guess is he never had the Game needed to even sniff at the women in the porn he claims he’s addicted to, but what Ariel had in spades was dominance. Raw forceful dominance he used to enslave not one, but three captured women. Capturing  and physically coercing them to be his prisoners was an act of dominance, but the want, and the expectation that he could have a harmonious normal life with these women was a testament to his (delusional) sense of self-importance.

Irrational self-confidence is the cornerstone of attraction.

When we contemplate male dominance it’s important to remember that to whatever degree we can actualize being dominant – at work, with women, in competition – our own personality, both flaws and attributes, will be manifested in our dominant actions and our beliefs. Castro is a piss poor example of a human being, but he’s an excellent illustration of how his frustrations and his personality were transferred into his actions.

He’s the negative side of that coin, and much of what is termed the Dark Triad of personality traits might also be considered dominant self-importance. However, that same sociopathy that makes for the bad examples is also the root of the positive ones. It really comes down to the individual, their sense of purpose and how they choose to direct that dominance.

If all this sounds like a pep talk to get you to adopt a more dominant mindset it wasn’t really my intent. I’m asked a lot, “Rollo if confidence is the key, then how do I get more confident?” This is a common deductive argument, as if they sold confidence in bottles at the drug store and all you had to do was buy the right brand. It doesn’t work this way. You have to believe it.

It’s fine for me to tell you act irrationally confident, and hope that the act becomes a permanent fixture in your personality, but most men don’t feel confident even when they’re acting confident. Confidence, and dominance, come from real established options and the knowing that you can successfully generate more. This is what makes confidence attractive, it’s the unspoken message to a woman that this guy can, has proven before, and potentially will again, produce more than he needs and other men aspire to do so.

Published by Rollo Tomassi

Author of The Rational Male and The Rational Male, Preventive Medicine

Leave a Reply

  Subscribe  
Notify of
cryo
Guest
cryo
Offline

Dominance, when applied to the increasingly sensitive modern social milieu, is a subtle art.

Men learning the basics of seduction sometimes confuse the term “dominance” to convey a brash “shut up bitch” demeanor that betrays their wounded beta souls. Dominance can be communicated in subtext, through layered language and symbolic body language. It is more than mere strong-arm tactics.

Socialkenny
Guest

It’s just hard to believe that this could’ve all gone down like that. Either those girls wanted to stay, or they could’ve left all those years. They claimed abuse, but what abuse was it? Physical? Emotional abuse in my book is bullshit and a cop out.

Ulf E
Guest
Ulf E
Offline

Rollo, if you know that you can do something difficult again, in what sense is your confidence “irrational”? In my view, confidence based on reality is eminently rational.

Rollo Tomassi
Guest

True, but before you became proficient at something you had to irrationally believe that you could.

The irrationality comes from daring to think you could.

Sam Basso
Guest
Sam Basso
Offline

Hi, that photo is from my website. It’s ok to use, but please include a link to my original article in exchange: http://samthedogtrainer.com/articles/understanding-the-dominant-dog/

Ulf E
Guest
Ulf E
Offline

Not sure. Before I become proficient at something, I believe/know that I have the ability to learn. Why? Because I have done it so many times before. It is something that I know about myself. So it’s no big deal, for me. Perhaps we’re talking past each other.

Ondrej
Guest
Ondrej
Offline

I don’t know how many of you guys know Jon Matrix (daygame.com instructor), but his dominance is extremely subtle yet extremely powerful.His sets are super boring, yet his nickname among the best London daygamers is Flake Zero. All that through body language, eye contact, cheeky smile and constant switching of rapport/teasing, scepticism when the girls invests and being unreactive. “Fair enough” and “ok” are his typical responses to girls:-)

Rollo Tomassi
Guest

Oh sure, sorry Sam.

Nietzsche
Guest
Nietzsche
Offline

“I
have
found
some kind of temporary sanity in this
Sh*t, blood and c*m on my hands”

Just made me think of that. Great song. TOOL rules.

YaReally
Guest
YaReally
Offline

“Dominance”

Oh, this title looks interesting, I wonder what interesting things about dominance will be talked about in this article and if there’s anything I can contribute to the discussion.

“Ariel Castro”
“War Brides”
“Stockholm Syndrome”

http://fredericiana.com/media/2013/homerback.gif

Keanu
Guest
Keanu
Offline

It’s a chicken-egg problem. It’s hard to be confident without having been in a pressure situation before. But it’s hard to get to that situation without exuding confidence in all of the action up to that point. You have to bring up both your ‘faked confidence’ and situational, been there done that confidence, parallel-ly.

Lucky White Male
Guest
Lucky White Male
Offline

I don’t understand the end of your sentence Rollo

“This is what makes confidence attractive, it’s the unspoken message to a woman that this guy can, has proven before, and potentially will again, produce more than he needs and * other men aspire to do so.” *

Are you saying Other Men aspire to do the same kind of producing that he’s doing?

Or that other men aspire to be him?

Isaac Jordan
Guest
Isaac Jordan
Offline

In his book “The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature,” Matt Ridley makes a compelling argument as to why sex evolved in the first place. His reasoning is that man’s greatest enemies, viruses and bacteria, are like little keys constantly trying to “unlock” the door that is our immune system. Our species is able to survive because every time we mate, each of our genes is randomly mixed with our partner’s in order to produce a unique offspring that will (hopefully) be able to stay one step ahead of the microbes, who in turn are also constantly… Read more »

orion
Guest
orion
Offline

@Rollo

True, but before you became proficient at something you had to irrationally believe that you could.

The irrationality comes from daring to think you could.”

Where is the irrationality if you indeed can do something sooner or later?

I think most people suffer from irrational lack of confidence, they could, if they just knew that they could.

Ondrej
Guest
Ondrej
Offline

Confidence is situational competence. You are confident when with old friends, when driving a car for 100000th time, but probably not playing golf or talking to hot blonde that normally doesn’t appear in your life.

Lucky White Male
Guest
Lucky White Male
Offline

Something I don’t get about the idea: “Women want good DNA”:

If a man starts out as Delta or Gamma, say, and then transforms to Beta or Alpha

Is his DNA really Delta or is it Alpha?

When we say ” A woman wants good DNA” are we saying his latent DNA he started out with. Or what he wound up as in life?

Copyleft
Guest
Copyleft
Offline

I wonder how many female fans he’s going to have writing to him in prison now that he’s become famous, demonstrated aggressive/dominant behavior, and been labeled a ‘bad boy’?

Lucky White Male
Guest
Lucky White Male
Offline

What a man would up as in life is not actually his DNA.

DNA is hard set at birth. “A woman wants good DNA” could really mean “A woman wants a Natural Alpha/ Natural Sigma”

If that is the case, a lot of guys are in trouble. Because the pure Alpha DNA – the natural Alpha – is obviously very rare

Ondrej
Guest
Ondrej
Offline

DNA is not hard set at birth. It’s higlhly modifiable. Methylation is one way body upregulates and downregulates activity of certain genes that are later translated to proteins, viruses, retroviruses, mutations are other ways…I could go on and on. Those changes occur based on your life interactions and actions. So do your best to be the best yourself and in today’s society, you’re immediately among 3% most attractive males in the world just because you try.

Lucky White Male
Guest
Lucky White Male
Offline

@ ondrej Testosterone capacity is hard set at birth. You can raise T, but only within certain boundaries, depending on who you are. Some men have naturally higher serum T levels , even when you take away environmental feedback, which can raise or lower it depending on outside victory or defeat Psychopathy disposition is genetic So is Narcissism. Also what we recognize as predisposition to high levels of Machiavellianism. Aggression capacity is genetic. So Testosterone, the Dark Triad, and Aggression are at least 4 variables that vary according to DNA. You can move up or down within natural boundaries, but… Read more »

Ondrej
Guest
Ondrej
Offline

All I am saying that your DNA is changing every day, repair processes occur every day, methylation occurs, viruses integrate themselves to it and upregulate certain parts of your genome.
So “rigid DNA” or “low variation in T levels” should be our reason to give up self-development and becoming better men? Great buffer, sophisticated one, but I don’t agree. Gym and infield practice will help anyone.

O.Outlier
Guest
O.Outlier
Offline

So, fake it until you make it, huh…it feels so odd at first. Even my male friends react weirdly to it. I think I just need new friends.

BC
Guest
BC
Offline

So, fake it until you make it, huh…it feels so odd at first. Try phrasing it as “Practice makes perfect” instead. Even my male friends react weirdly to it. I think I just need new friends. Unless your friends are red-pill aware and/or also working to improve themselves as a part of strengthening your wolf pack, then yes, you may need new friends. This is due to the psycho-social phenomenon of the Self-fulfilling Prophecy whereby people are unconsciously compelled to act in accordance with expectations and how they are treated. Your friends know and are comfortable with the “past you”… Read more »

JTR
Guest
JTR
Offline

When ancient Rome wanted to expand their populace from just a small tribe they invited another, larger tribe over for a party. Once everyone was good and plastered and mostly asleep, they killed all the men and enslaved the women. Sex slaves, mind you. This Ariel guy was just born in the wrong century, and may or may not be Pagan, who knows?.

I imagine all those enslaved women by Roman men got along well with their new masters…after a few beatings. Probably very few.

The moral?
When it comes to defending a way of life…don’t depend on women.

gregg
Guest
gregg
Offline

We used to think that women want goood and responsible guys. It proved to be false so now we, STUPID IDIOTS, think that women want..ehm…”dominant” guys. Cocky and ..ehm..funny. If you happened to be in the skin of an attractive man for one single day, you would understand WHAT WOMEN WANT. You wolud SEE and FEEL it. Are all this puas ugly dudes? All this WORK you have to do to be worthy of women? You have to do THIS you have to do THAT, you have to say this or that. WTF? Atractive man has not to do pretty… Read more »

D-Man
Guest
D-Man
Offline

Irrational confidence and aggression need to be alloyed with coolness… by coolness, I don’t mean trendiness, I mean not really caring too much.

When forging a sword: 100% steel is brittle and will (analogy intended) SNAP.

Add carbon (coolness, whatever you wanna call it, outcome independence), and your blade will be stronger, more flexible, and hold a better edge.

trackback

[…] is a pernicious meme that has taken hold like a dandelion. The meme is that irrational self confidence will aid your […]

xsplat
Guest
xsplat
Offline

There is a pernicious meme that has taken hold like a dandelion. The meme is that irrational self confidence will aid your self interest. It is pernicious because it is a short term solution that it in the long term detrimental. I don’t want to look around me 15 years from now and see that my friends are all now crack addicted homeless bums. And so when I can I mention to people “Hey, it’s probably not a good idea to spend all your money on crack”. And I don’t want to look around 15 years from now and see… Read more »

xsplat
Guest
xsplat
Offline

In discussions where we share ideas and examine them, accuracy is important. A small conceptual mis-step of one degree can after many miles lead one far astray. Irrational confidence necessarily means confidence that excludes data. It necessarily means deliberately ignoring reality. This type of thinking can not be applied only as required – it is a habit that will infect other habits, until you will be narcissistic in your world view – you will unconsciously avoid trains of thought that lead to a loss of esteem. You won’t be able to think clearly – even when you want to. It… Read more »

xsplat
Guest
xsplat
Offline

New term: rational-funny-humility-with-genuine-realistic-pride

Ulf E
Guest
Ulf E
Offline

xsplat: “It is possible to have confidence without excluding reality. You can know your relative strengths and weaknesses, and know how much more attractive you would be if you were more confident, and you can put on some rational bluster and fake confidence. That does not exclude reality. That is rational confidence. You can rationally know how much your display of confidence in real life affects reality. Reality respects us to the degree we respect it. Allegiance to truth wins out in the long game.” This is very good. I agree. There is no need – only real danger –… Read more »

Just Saying
Guest
Just Saying
Offline

“the results of a hard-wired Stockholm Syndrome in women?” Most “news” media will not mention the fact that the Stockholm Syndrome is limited to women – no men ever confuse who the enemy is, and why they need to be killed. That is why no matter how long men have been held prisoner in times of war – or peace – when given the opportunity they will kill their captor and escape. Woman do not do that – they adapt to see the most bizarre behavior as the norm. This is why women will argue with you that the broken… Read more »

Inane Rambler
Guest
Inane Rambler
Offline

Why does this article sound like you actually admire Castro?

The man is scum that deserves to be locked up until he expires.

trackback

[…] of a man’s life, but in a strictly intergender sense this applies to men establishing a positive dominance in their relationships with women. In a dating context of non-exclusivity (plate spinning) this […]

k Y
Guest
k Y
Offline

“Naturally the feminine-primary meme is that Castro was “blaming the victim“, but I don’t think that was his point. He knows he’s going to prison for life plus 1,000 years, why not just shut up and go away?” Why the fuck do you have to wrap this as some feminine primary thing? you ever think a mal-adapted person will lie and get defensive to make himself look good and lie? He had problems with his work and the women said he would test them and beat them if they failed a test, or are red pill men not going to… Read more »

%d bloggers like this: