Queens, Workers & Drones

mount

As I’ve stated in many prior posts, it is Men, not women who are the True Romantics. It is actually Men who will more readily alter their lives in the most radical of ways to achieve what they think is an idyllic state of monogamy with their ‘Woman of Quality’. I understand how this statement may conflict with women’s (and mangina symp’s) characterizations of ‘typical guys’ just wanting to fuck anything that smiles at them, but this sentiment is only designed to maintain the feminine as the victimized gender.

It is in fact Men who are more prone to wanting commitment from a woman. The operative word here is “wanting” commitment.

Men are now also just as likely to want to get married as women and more likely to fall in love at first sight.

Experts said that the results were evidence of ‘gender blurring’ in which women have become more like men and men have taken on the characteristics usually associated with women.

I doubt that last quote from this article will shock my regular readers. Considering that the overwhelming majority of men are corn-fed betas, raised from birth to be devoted, “supportive”, wives to their masculinized fem-husbands, it’s really no surprise that men would be the ones seeking solace in a monogamy they’ve been conditioned to believe should be their goal-state for so long.

While betas are concerned with qualifying for an idyllic monogamy, Alphas tend to focus more on fidelity – their women’s fidelity, not necessarily their own.

Feminized Commitment

One very effective meme the feminine imperative has cunningly inserted into our social awareness is the feminine ownership of the term ‘commitment’. Calling a guy a ‘commitment-phobe’ is really a 90’s shaming cliché that’s been a retread for the Man Up! generation. There are different variation of this shaming – a guy can be ‘phobic’ because he lacks maturity, or because he’s become bitter and burned by a spurned woman, but underneath all that is the association that the concept of commitment uniquely applies to a man committing to monogamy with a woman.

From the Paradox of Commitment:

The idea is that commitment should only have meaning in a feminine defined reality. Ironically, it’s Men who commit far more readily to ideals, family, military, business ventures or partnerships, and servitude than women have the capacity to appreciate, because recognizing this doesn’t serve their imperative. In other words, a commitment to anything that doesn’t directly benefit the feminine isn’t commitment; answer? Redefine commitment to reflect feminine interests.

One thing that needs to be understood about women’s innate feminine solipsism is how it’s expressed on a meta-scale. It’s very easy to observe and consider individual examples of women’s subconscious sense of self-importance (read any comment from women on a manosphere blog) , but what most men aware of this phenomenon don’t consider is how this solipsism scales up to the larger social narrative.

I’ve written extensively about the Feminine Reality and Feminine Social Primacy, but these have been ‘top down’ assessments with regard to how society follows a feminine primary narrative as the correct premise of origin. Put simply, if it benefits women, it benefits society – society is better when benefiting women’s imperatives are its focus.

However, from a ‘bottom up’ perspective it is this proclivity for solipsism in women that collectively becomes the social narrative (or paradigm if you prefer). Millions of women solipsistically expressing the demands that would ensure a secure hypergamy for themselves makes for a fem-centric social narrative. And from this develops an expectation of, and entitlement to a default, secured commitment to satisfying women’s hypergamic impulses.

Selective Breeding

So powerful is this sense of entitlement, so consuming and convinced of the correctness of their purpose is the feminine that women will literally breed and raise generations of men to better satisfy it. Hypergamy is cruel, but nowhere more so than in the relationship between a mother overtly raising and conditioning a son to be a better servant of the feminine imperative.

But to breed a better worker, the feminine imperative’s queens can’t afford to have any corrupting, masculine, outside influence. On a societal scale this might mean removal (either by disincentives or forcibly) of a father from the family unit, but this is the easy, extreme illustration. There are far more subtle social and psychological means that the imperative uses to effect this filtering – via mass media, social doctrines, appeals to (feminized) morality, the feminine is placed as the correct imperative while the masculine is filtered out or apologetically tolerated as vestiges of an immature and crude reminder of masculinity’s incorrectness.

Yet for all of this social engineering Hypergamy still demands satisfaction of women’s most base imperative, Alpha seed. The queens need physically / psychologically dominant drones – if just for a season and at their ovulatory pleasure. While beta workers are endlessly vetted in sisyphean tasks of qualifying for the acceptance of the feminine imperative, the Alpha drones live outside this shell; their qualifications only based on how well they satisfy the feminine’s visceral side of  hypergamy.

The great irony of this social solution to hypergamy and long term parental investment is that the vast majority of the offspring of this arrangement would be raised to be better workers. Those betas-to-be boys must be insulated from the corrupting influence of the drones lest they devolve into the Alphas they crave yet cannot control. It may seem counterintuitive, to raise what should ostensibly be optimized genetic stock as a cowed, sometimes medically restrained, feminized beta males. However it is through this harsh conditioning that truly dominant Alphas must rise above. Essentially the genetic lottery isn’t won by women in such a social environment – it’s men, or the ones who rise above in spite of the conditioning efforts of the feminine imperative.

Generation AFC

We’re just now seeing the results of almost three generations of this selective breeding effort. While women bleat and bemoan, “Man Up!” over the lack of suitable men to meet both their hypergamy and their provisioning, they only grind their teeth at the results of a social momentum set in motion by women two or three generations before them. While more boys are raised to pee sitting down by women concerned that their sons’ testosterone poisoning will make him a potential rapist, the fewer and fewer “suitable” males present themselves 20 years later.

A lot has been made about men just checking out or giving up on themselves as they reach a projected notion of maturity. The feminine complains about them not living up to the standard set before them by the feminine imperative – women are owed reverence and tribute of an enduring security, why are men not sacrificing themselves on the altar of the goddess? In the face of all the so called social advancements in women’s independence over the past 50 years we still hear a deafening cry for ‘real men’ to measure up, to qualify themselves for acceptance, to be worthy of providing for her and (her) offspring. Despite the refutations of masculinity and claims of independence, women still want Men.

In the manosphere it’s been argued that the reason for this sexual disparity and men’s ambivalence is due to some new awareness among men of the way the Game has been rigged against them. It’s been argued that men are consciously opting out – going their own way – in some new social movement causing a de facto ‘marriage strike’. I think this estimation is greatly exaggerated.

The male crisis of this generation isn’t the result of men’s conscious decision to opt out, but rather due to being forced out by this selective breeding. As exampled in my first link, men want to get married. It’s part of their feminized conditioning to view long term monogamy as a goal state. No, the men that women want to “man up” are the ones they’re already married to, or the ones they’d consider worthy if only they acted (not actually became) more like drones and less like dutiful workers.

It’s not that the vast majority of men wouldn’t eagerly bind themselves to women in monogamy, it’s that they’ve been bred in grand proportions to be ‘less-than-men’ by the feminine imperative.

Published by Rollo Tomassi

Author of The Rational Male and The Rational Male, Preventive Medicine

Leave a Reply

  Subscribe  
Notify of
( @ Y @ )
Guest
( @ Y @ )
Offline

Excellent post Rollo, now how do we get all this as a textbook standard for Social studies classes in schools?

Rollo Tomassi
Guest

Working on it.

The Other Jim
Guest
The Other Jim
Offline

@TaterEarl: “Man Daisy really rode the duck carousel.”

That was by 1950’s/pre-Sexual Revolution standards too. Now, that type of carousel count is pretty average if not on the low side for many women.

1 Woman's View
Guest
1 Woman's View
Offline

“Are you bragging about having a massive bitch shield and that you when you’re attracted to a man you don’t have any feminine charm that you simply approach like a man?” No bitch shield, ferrett, just no “signals” – overt or covert. When a woman wants a man she gives off overt signals. When a woman is otherwise open to meeting men in general then she gives off covert signals that men can pick up on in public (I think). I don’t give off either, but I’m not a bitch. I treat people with civility, just no flirting. Loading...

trackback

[…] The fruits of rebellion. Related: Answering rebellion. Related: Everybody’s into (fake) submission now. Related: Frost has a warning for good women. Related: Men have been bred out of the marriage market. […]

OlioOx
Guest
OlioOx
Offline

I get a real bang out of King A. For one thing, he has a certain recognizable style. This comment is about one of his style’s major and most frequent features; see if you can guess the usual term for this kind of thing, after you read these examples culled from just his last few contributions (my emphases): You are engaged in a project of finding secret feminism in the warp and woof of history, like Dan Brown sniffing out selective evidence of conspiracy theories in the Vatican Library. The smaller and unimaginative minds in places [i.e., blogs] like these… Read more »

Mark Minter
Guest

Ace Haley. That 4% increase of 35-40 “never marrieds” was white women. I got the figure from Dalrock’s never married data. The majority of the unmarrieds are Latinas and Black women. Here is a link to the graphic. http://dalrock.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/1999to2012whitealonenevermarried25to49big.jpg In growth terms, it’s a 50% growth which makes for an eye popping headline. In data terms it went from 11% to 15.4%. Given the amount ridiculously fat and ugly women I see today, so fat they have to use electric carts to shop, far more numerous today then I can ever recall, I assume that pretty any woman who has… Read more »

OlioOx
Guest
OlioOx
Offline

Oh by the way, Rollo, this was really an excellent post. But it might be going a bit far to say that average male behavior today is a result of selection or “breeding.” Culture, environment, education, propaganda etc. are more than sufficient to account for the changes in behavior we see without believing there has been a dramatic change in the male genome in just three generations. Even Cochrane and Harpending would probably say that’s a bit too fast.

(And I cocked-up a few of my bolds in my previous comment, but I’m sure you’ll all get the idea.)

gregg
Guest
gregg
Offline

true, of course. Men were created to be slaves of feminine imperative. They are made that way. Sense of manhood of 99 percent men is so pathectically and inexstricably attached to the pussy, that these men really do not have a choice. Given their biology, men are merely drones and slaves for women. On the contrary, women can do perfectly WITHOUT MEN. They only need protection and resources. But they DO need children – they are slaves to. Again – as females, they are made that way. This disparity is the source of BIIIIG advantage of women in dating enviroment.… Read more »

taterearl
Guest
taterearl
Offline

“Truly unplugged man – one in million, subconsciously does not need women for him feeling good and manly. THIS is the difference. He somehow defeated his body, his biological slavery.He enjoys women if he wants, but he does no need them. He genuinely FEELS that way. They have no power over him.”

They are found in your local graveyard.

Underdog
Guest
Underdog
Offline

There’s a difference between being a slave to your dick and being a slave to a pussy.

Rollo Tomassi
Guest

I get a real bang out of King A. For one thing, he has a certain recognizable style.

I find Matt’s sermons more readable (and entertaining) when I imagine his diction delivered in the voice of Dr. Smith from Lost in Space.

Mark Minter
Guest

Rollo, ESPN backed down and apologized about Brent Musburger’s rather nothing comments about the Alabama quarterback’s girlfriend. Most of the comments on the site showed surprise that anything was said. I wrote a comment about how women have to shame older men for showing attention to any younger women because of dread and that dread over the loss sexual power is a primal emotion in women and is behind divorce laws. Women have to shame any older man that pays attention to a younger women. And they do it because of that dread. And the moderators at ESPN deleted it.… Read more »

Sir Alan
Guest
Sir Alan
Offline

This post makes my stomach churn but it already reinforces what I know to be true. I just wish my friends did the same as well. It’s amazing how Rollo really gets to the undercurrent and really examines what drives this current SMV. Many people are too concerned with surface pitter-patter bullshit but what lurks in the shadows is too disturbing to ignore.

One day, we’ll all have flashlights.

Ace Haley
Guest
Ace Haley
Offline

@Gregg: You may have a point there. I read somewhere that the natural state of man was slavery.

Ace Haley
Guest
Ace Haley
Offline

The Stinger Q. Is there a single, dominant force used by predatory females to hypnotize and control males? A. It is a combination of her appearance, personality, charm, wit, compatibility, and sexual prowess. Narrowed down to one thing: raw sexual allurement. Pussy power will ultimately deal the knockout blow. In the advanced stages of sexual hypnosis, the male may subconsciously want to crawl into the vagina and live there. Most normal, healthy men are capable of becoming TOTAL SLAVES to a well orchestrated sexual enticement and THE PREDATORY FEMALE IS ACUTELY AWARE OF THIS (my emphasis added). If necessary, she… Read more »

hi
Guest
hi
Offline

“Its because I find most people in this country, both male and female, physically unattractive and don’t want to be approached by them.”

Thank you so much for reminding me why American women aren’t worth my time.

trackback

[…] for being a manboobed captain amongst the vichy males feminization has made so common through its selective breeding efforts . The lengths to which he’s ego-invested his life, career and personality into a […]

Westcoaster
Guest
Westcoaster
Offline

The message from women to men is so confusing these days, thanks Rollo, for trying to wade through the muck. Agree on the true romantics being men. Quick story: Friend of a friend actually put flowers in a guitar case and played some tunes below his oneitis woman’s window. Instead of pretending to like it, or even laughing and making light of it, she told his best friend how bad it was. The friend AFCed and agreed with her and today regrets it since his friend died of cancer. He said he wishes he would’ve said, “Hey, shut your pie… Read more »

Rollo Tomassi
Guest

^^^

Good to have you back West. Please stick around.

Westcoaster
Guest
Westcoaster
Offline

Thanks, Rollo, this, blog is awesome. I’d love to see these essays in a popular book form. Not only do guys like me need it, but the younger generation of boys and men really need this wisdom. I’ve got so many stories of my long-married friends going through hell on the verge of divorce with angry, drunk, eating-disorder women, it’s amazing. And my single friends continue to make bad choices with whom they date.

Mebus
Guest
Mebus
Offline

“Not only do guys like me need it, but the younger generation of boys and men really need this wisdom. ”

Which begs the question if they (the younger generation) really want to see the intricacies of the situation. Feminism is everywhere, from grade school to the workplace.

I have a feeling the majority is -or will be- locked in and either unable or unwilling to see what’s going on. Think of Milgram’s seminal work ‘obedience to authority’. Well, in these days and in the near future, feminism is that authority.

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Shameful
If the desire for resources are so strong isnt the logical endpoint forced labor camps full of effectively castrated men? A world where the alpha are risen up to stand aside as breeding stock while the other males are forced to labor for the “greater good” of society.

Remove the words “labor camps” and insert “cube farm” or “call center” or “food service” or “retail clerk”. Now, how does this read; predictively or descriptively?

Anonymous Reader
Guest
Anonymous Reader
Offline

Mebus Testosterone levels in males in western society continue to drop, and I’m really wondering whether the culprit is just those estrogen analogues (BPA and other) in food and water. Never mind estrogen analogs. There’s plenty of estrogen in any drinking water that comes from a surface source in most of the West, courtesy of women’s birth control pills. Search around, and be amazed – from fish in the Rhine to gators in Florida to fish and invertebrates in every major US river, there are male animals displaying female characteristics, because they are literally swimming in estrogen-contaminated water. Now, try… Read more »

trackback

[…] Feminine Imperative will encourage this, fun for the Alpha and slavery for the beta.  Today, you AMOG by cutting into his pride.  What if to AMOG you have to kill the fuck?  Can […]

Anthony
Guest
Anthony
Offline

I usually don’t comment on these blogs but enjoy reading them, but this post really opened my eyes(and my eyes are already opened so that says a lot). I’m blessed with a mother that came from a place(Lebanon) and time(1950’s) where women are loyal to and love their men. And she raised her kids very well. We were raised to be gentlemen to everyone. But, contrary to what men hating and indoctrinated women do with their sons, my mom never taught us to have general kindness toward women, my mom knows what women are like and always encouraged her boys… Read more »

Rollo Tomassi
Guest

Thanks Anthony

Pantyfx
Guest
Pantyfx
Offline

I think this is a wonderful start. Rollo you really deliver next level observation and it’s a joy to read.

The Red Queen is a form of girl game and I agree that most men have been priced out of their dream world settling for instead a kind of universal hand owned largely by women.

To regain this kind of universal hand, what kind of life does one lead such that a girl is willing to abandon her dreams (if temporarily) to serve yours?

I think you can have both. Sort of a red queen pretender game.

oogenhand
Guest
oogenhand
Offline

A very extreme example:
Jennifer has her sons circumcised, she has sex with Mexican men.
Janneke didn´t have her sons circumcised, she has sex with Moroccan men.

kobayashii1681
Guest

“what most men aware of this phenomenon don’t consider is how this solipsism scales up to the larger social narrative.”

It never ceases to amaze….

trackback

[…] I covered this a while back in Queens, Workers & Drones: […]

hosswire
Guest
hosswire
Offline

Come on.

Even on this site — by a man, for men — the comment board gets taken over by responses to and from @kate .

Solipsists gonna make it all about themselves. Hamsters gonna rationalize. And post-wall formerly cute gals are gonna desperately wiggle & preen for scraps of male attention.

Any legitimate insight that @kate might generate in her mind isn’t going to make it past those three filters. Any information that we present to her isn’t going to make its way in. Just ignore her.

%d bloggers like this: