The Myth of the Alpha Female

On last Saturday’s Red Man Group we took a call from a woman who has apparently just discovered the “red pill school of thought” and looked up what ever convoluted definitions she could find from the ‘normie web’ to better understand it. For context, the whole exchange began around the 2:04:00 mark here, but the bit I want to dissect I’ve cued up to 2:09 in the above video. The Red Pill as a praxeology is often something most uninitiated people don’t have the patience to really want to understand. So when they’re confronted with a Red Pill truth that conflicts with some ego-invested belief they often just resort to what I call “point and sputter” – they spit out some school yard taunt, tell you how unbelievable it is anyone could ever believe such a thing in this day and then move along to whatever ideological site they’re comforted by.

Credit where it’s due, this woman (and I apologize for not getting her name) at the very least was prompted to ask some questions about how we come to whatever misattributed ideas she read were what it is we think. Listen to the whole exchange for context. In the beginning I was asked the standard “what do you tel your daughter about all of this?” as if this is going to somehow shame me back down to earth, but the part she was most distraught over was the idea that “women are only valuable for what they look like”.

My response to her was based on an essay I wrote 4 years ago titled Separating Values. In that piece I tried to outline how women today have trouble separating their sexual market value from their self-perceived personal worth:

Conflating Values

One of the major problems women have, and more than even some red pill men have, is the conflation of sexual market value with their intrinsic personal value as a human being.

It needs to be emphasized that while personal value is influential in sexual market value, SMV is distinct from your value as a human being. I’m stressing this because, in the age Disney Princess empowerment, this conflation of the two has become a go-to social convention; and not just for women.

What [Robin] Korth suffers from is presuming her personal value is her sexual market value.

It’s disruptive to her self-perceptions and ego-investments when that presumption is challenged by a man who doesn’t want to fuck her for reasons based on the intrinsic value she believes she’s entitled to by virtue of maturity and imaginings of self-sufficiency. Just as women aren’t aroused by men’s own self-concepts of virtuousness and aspirations of higher purpose, men aren’t aroused by whatever ephemeral self-perceptions a woman may have.

Listening to this woman’s concerns, it’s a fairly common refutation and one we come to expect from a mindset that presumes men callously objectify women out of hand, or due to their being taught to be so by a chauvinistic toxic masculinity. Women cling to this because it sounds right and reinforces the victimhood narrative that defines the collective identity of the Sisterhood. So when they read it or see it openly embraced, or spoken about men in a positive context it’s confirmation of an offense they want to believe is endemic in men. Thus, we get the “literally shaking”, sound of a quavering voice.

However, all of this gets in the way of women really understanding that they’ve been conditioned to conflate their personal worth with their sexual market value. As I mentioned in my response, a woman can be a wonderful humanitarian, a great mother, the CEO of a Fortune 500 company or someone who adds value to the depth and breadth of humankind, but it won’t make her look any better in a bikini. And that is where sexual market value starts for women when it comes to men’s arousal and attraction. For as long as I’ve been writing this blog I’ve tried to explain this in as simple a way as possible; men and women are different. Part of our differences is that what constitutes sexual market value for one sex is not an equal evaluation for the other. For as much as the equalist mindset pervades our social consciousness, the reality is men and women are different in many fundamental ways.

One reason Red Pill awareness in men gets vilified by women is because it nakedly exposes, discusses and develops sexual and life strategies around some very Darwinistic and unflattering realities of intersexual dynamics based on those differences. But exposing these differences is only offensive to this social order because there is a presumption of a blank-slate equalism that’s been embedded into every aspect of our gender understanding for almost 70 years now. This offensiveness is less about the actual nuts and bolts of evolution, biology and psychological differences between men and women, but more so it’s about the ego-invested idea that men and women should be blank-slate, functional equals in all respects. Even this presumption is a horse-shit cover story for the latent purpose of feminism floating the lie of “equality” – fundamentally disempowering men so women can aspire to be their masters in various ways.

The woman from our discussion expressed this barely containable angst that men only value her as a sexual object, and it’s important to suss out the reasoning for this confusion and rage. As I mentioned, the problem women have is an inability to separate their sexual market value from their personal value a ‘basic human being‘. A quote I’m known for is “virtue is anti-seductive.” No guy ‘virtues’ a woman into bed, and while I get push back for devaluing the importance of virtue occasionally, what I don’t get is any disagreement from men or women on that point. Virtue, intelligence, honor, duty, wisdom and any number of other esoteric features that would make a man a terrific human being do nothing (or sometimes work against him) for his raw visceral sexuality that women are aroused by. For men, however, these traits and many more will definitely add to his attractiveness as a long term prospect for women.

In men, affluence, status, intelligence, improvisation, creativity, ambition, drive, perseverance, humor, positive-conventional masculinity, and many more aspects make this man an attractive choice for a long term relationship with women. These are attributes that contribute to a man’s sexual market value, but they are incomplete without a raw, visceral physical component. Hypergamy serves two masters, Alpha seed and Beta need – and as such it hates the one and loves the other depending on what a woman’s most pressing necessity happens to be at that point in her life. Women have an innate, limbic understanding of what makes a man a complete package – a great catch.

Where this and most other women fail is that their own Fempowerment conditioning teaches them that what makes a man attractive, what makes his SMV appealing to women must necessarily be what makes for her own personal value and sexual market value. The reason this woman is shaking here is because this conditioning has convinced her and generations of women to build a life predicated on a fallacy: What makes her a “good person” should necessarily make her attractive and arousing to men. This is a great falsehood that is the root of many of the gender conflicts and misunderstandings we see around us today.

Gendered Differences in Attraction

The things that make a woman’s sexual market value high are not the same things make her sense of personal worth high. Yet, this is exactly what the Feminine Imperative conditions women to believe and seeks to shame men for not complying with this fallacy. When men opt for younger, hotter, tighter at all ages of their own maturity, the visceral message is clear – it makes no difference what a woman’s personal value is when it comes to sexual valuation. Where women fall short is they presume that men cannot appreciate women for anything but their sexual value.

This is an interesting dynamic since the Imperative teaches women never to implicitly do anything for a man.

The prime directive of feminism for the past 50 years has been founded on women striving to achieve the ideal of the Strong Independent Woman® (SIW). This SIW ideal is the carrot that gets the mules to pull the cart. That ideal is never fully attainable because if it were it would make an end state for feminism a realizable goal rather than the self-perpetuating social mechanism it is. The SIW ideal is intentionally ambiguous, but the concept is based on selling women the idea that they can not only “have it all” but they can be it all too. The ‘independence’ feminism sells predicated on being a self-sustaining, self-satisfying, autonomous ‘thing’ that doesn’t need for anything. A woman is every bit as good a feminine role model as she is a masculine one, ergo, she has no need for men beyond the physical aspect. In fact, an independence from men, from any form of dependency on men, has been part of the feminist charter since Seneca Falls in 1848.

From a Red Pill perspective, and in my opinion, this independence from men has been the single most damaging aspect of feminism in its history. Men and women evolved to be complements to the other and in evolutionary terms are far stronger together than apart. Each compensates for the one’s innate weaknesses with the other’s innate strengths. Feminism preaches two lies in this respect – the first being that a woman can “have it all”, but also she can be an autonomous being with no intrinsic needs beyond what she can provide for or address herself. The lie is that she “don’t need no man” when a hundred thousand years of evolution says different. Men and women need each other, but it’s feminism that’s selling the lie that they don’t.

The ironic part about this socialized lie is that in emancipating women from the ‘dependency’ of men feminism has founded the basis of ‘having it all’ on how closely a woman can emulate a man. The definition of a successful Strong Independent Woman is how closely she can replicate the success of men. This ideal for SIW success is based on a masculine ideal. As feminism has refocused women’s goals on these masculine ideals it has systematically altered the definition of femininity to align with its ideal of ‘success’.

The Myth of the Alpha Female

As part of that new masculine ideal of female success, along came the concept of the Alpha Female. I’ve read dozens of articles about this fantasy creature; how she’s a boss who takes no shit and turns companies around from the brink of bankruptcy by virtue of being female. A woman of the future who emulates and exceeds the successes of any apex-male CEO of those sexist Fortune 500 companies. Even if she’s not a high powered exec, the match (literally) of any man, women still love to imagine themselves in this “alpha” role in their own little worlds.

“I’m an Alpha Female, and maybe I’m not a jet setter, but I’m a Type A personality and as such I’m headstrong, a go-getter woman who knows what she wants.”

This sloganized mental model is part of the new Strong Independent Woman® costume that feminism is selling to women today.

If you’re a woman who’s bought into the Confidence Porn narrative that’s so popular today, allow me to ruin that image for you. There is no such thing as an “alpha” female – at least not in the respect of the idealistic Fempowered fantasy you think applies to you. The Feminine Imperative likes to convince women that they are ‘Alpha’ using that same masculine model definitions I detailed above here. The Strong Independent Woman meme only holds up insofar as it emulates masculine success and a masculine defined concept of ‘Alpha’. By this definition every woman has a potential to be an ‘alpha’ female in her own little way. Like I said, the Confidence Porn women gobble up is so tasty because it’s so achievable – all you have to do is cop the “I’m the boss, I’m a Type A person” attitude, put some foam inserts in the shoulders of your ‘power suit’ and you too can be Alpha because you say so and you walk the same walk as an Alpha Male.

The push for female-primacy has conditioned generations of women to expect an entitled, default respect, and a deference to their authority from men. They’re told at every opportunity from the time they’re 5 years old that they can do anything, have it all, be it all, and they’re the “natural leaders of the future”. By extension this leads women to the Alpha Female trope.

Ironically, the same people who love to ridicule the idea of ‘Alpha Males’ completely accept the concept of an Alpha Female. They’ll make funny videos ridiculing the Red Pill for using ‘alpha’ as a referential term – “These jokers think they’re wolves or Silver Back Gorillas, hur hur!” – but they’ll eagerly embrace the idea of an ‘alpha’ female. That conditioned deference of the feminine makes it believable; and they like the idea that identifying with women’s delusions of empowerment might get them laid.

Attribution Bias Error

The error that women and feminism make in the ‘Alpha Female’ respect is an attribution bias error. Women are conditioned to believe that if they value the aspects of what makes men attractive, what makes them a good pairing, that men must also value those traits in women. If status, power, social proof, affluence, careerism, drive, etc. is what gets them hot for men (in the long term) then possessing those traits themselves must also be attractive in the reverse. Unfortunately for women, they’re painfully (but slowly) learning that men and women are in fact different and the lie of egalitarian equalism has essentially cost them a future with a husband, children and family living.

In order to counter this harsh reality an industry in biotech egg-freezing has sprung up around the very real female insecurity that these confident Alpha Women wont find a suitable man to start a family with now that they are well past the Wall. Feminine-primary society is capitalizing on this fear.

But the reverse is true; men’s sexual selection criteria is far more simplistic than women’s. From an evolved, naturalist perspective men select women based on looks and sexual availability – and on a subconscious level women know this, yet they rationalize that men should be interested in their coequal professionalism, status and any number of intrinsic qualities they believe they possess. The root of this misunderstanding is once again the socialized lie of egalitarian, blank-slate equalism. Only now women expect that if they invest themselves in the same pursuits as Alpha men that this should compensate for their lack of physical appeal. If men and women are functional equals what defines male dominance should also define female dominance. Evolution says differently.

The woman on the left (Reneé Sommerfield) is the true Alpha female by the standards of evolutionary realities. The woman on the right (Sheryl Sandberg) is what our gynocentric social order would have men believe should be considered an ‘alpha’ female. This is the conflict that’s at the heart of so many manufactured crises of attraction for women and the failure of their long-term plans to have a family.

The Alpha Female is really the woman who best embodies what men’s evolved, biological imperatives determine what makes her an attractive breeding and long-term mate choice. Men’s criteria is very simple; fitness, youth, assertive sexuality, playfulness, conventional femininity and genuine desire to please him. Beyond this, submission, respect, nurturing (potential mothering qualities), a natural deference to male authority, humility, admiration and an unobligated desire to recognize that man as her complementary partner are just some of the long-term attributes that make a woman someone a man might want to invest himself in a family with.

Unfortunately all of this criteria is counter to the message ‘alpha‘ Females are taught are valuable today. They are taught that anything a woman might do for the expressed pleasure of a man is anathema to the Strong Independent Woman® meme. The presumption is that a desire to meet any of this criteria is a failure on the part of a woman who demands to be the ‘equal’ of a man. Even acknowledging the innate, complementary natures of men and women is an affront to the equalist narrative. Furthermore, any man who would base (much less express) his own decision making criteria as such is shamed via social conventions. The narrative is that he must be needy, or threatened by a “strong woman” or he must want this woman to be his Mommy substitute. All of this is a social mechanic meant to force fit that natural complementary criteria into the box of egalitarian equalism.

Value Added

I don’t write for a female readership per se. In fact, I don’t really direct my writing towards any audience, but in this instance I want to end here with a message for my female readers. Take this message to the bank: the sexes evolved to be complementary to each other, not adversarial. But that adversarial feeling you get when you read me describing some unflattering aspect of female nature is the product of your own Blue Pill conditioning that’s taught you the lie of egalitarianism-as-female-empowerment. If you truly want to ‘empower‘ yourselves set aside your self-importance, look inside yourselves and ask this question –

What is it about me that a man would find attractive from a naturalistic perspective?

What do I possess that a man would truly believe is Value Added?

That may feel a bit counterintuitive to you, but understand that the reason this introspection is alien or offensive to you is because you’ve been conditioned to believe that your masculine qualities are what men should find attractive about you. You turn this offense back on men and make it their fault for not finding your ‘alpha femaleness’ the root of their attraction to you. Is the idea of changing yourself, to add value to your package, for the pleasure of a man a source of anger for you? Why is that?

I see far too many otherwise beautiful women who destroy themselves on the lie of the ‘alpha’ female and a never ending struggle to perfect an equalist archetype in themselves. They rail on about infantile men, or bemoan that men are afraid to ask them out, or ask “Where are all the good guys nowadays?” Understand that these efforts to shame men into finding something attractive about you based on your masculine criteria for attraction will always fail; leaving you a lonely childless middle aged wreck all because you refused to accept that you need to be someone worth marrying.

Men and women are better together than they are apart. We evolved to be complements to the other. But, feminism, the Feminine Imperative and an endemic Fempowerment culture have taught you to believe “you are enough”, you are complete, you don’t need a man because you can satisfy all of your own needs. This is the most damning lie ever perpetrated on womankind – that you can be it all – and only when it’s too late do women realize that they’ve been had.

5 2 votes
Article Rating

Published by Rollo Tomassi

Author of The Rational Male and The Rational Male, Preventive Medicine

Speak your mind

519 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Keith
Keith
3 years ago

If it is such a thing as a Alfa-female wouldn’t she be a woman that secures a Alfa male and manipulates his wealth and Human Resources for the benefit of her own children and self preservation. Is this the reason teenage girls are so fast to marry the first guy that says ( I love you ) then move out of the family home? I think most men think that a female has daddy- daughter issues when really it’s mother daughter issues that is the catalyst for a lot the conflict that surrounds them. Only it’s covert and not overt… Read more »

Roused
Roused
3 years ago

@Sentient “Snip… Lights out.” Yup, if you rely on the open web and typical commercial hosting you will be at their mercy when public outcry demands your site be shut down. What to do? Host your site on the dark web. Purchase your own servers and host them in as secure fashion as you can afford. Allow access to it via only Tor and share Onion links via private messaging or post it in various places people can find. One needs to only study basic tradecraft to figure out it’s easy to put links in public places for people to… Read more »

kfg
kfg
3 years ago

Nothing, and hypergamy doesn’t care about that either.

Anonymous Reader
Anonymous Reader
3 years ago

Roused
Outside of the hosting hassles any user who wants to access the site needs to download and use a Tor browser.

Or just use Brave.

https://brave.com/tor-tabs-beta

Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

Roused

Stormfront is actually still up at Stormfront.org .

I got an email earlier this month,, but when I went to check it out, it was down. Maybe a dos attack or something.

But the activity is way down.compared to the past.

Sentient
Sentient
3 years ago

Storefront.name

If they kill your dns translation you are fucked. Tor won’t help but for the hard core converts.

Btw this is who “owns” the internet in the US.

https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/board-of-directors

See any problems here?

Anonymous Reader
Anonymous Reader
3 years ago

“James”

Kfg, are you against hypergamy?

Are you trolling?

Sentient
Sentient
3 years ago

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/08/how-the-left-is-outsourcing-censorship-of-the-internet.php It started when YouTube downgraded PragerU’s videos. Weird: PragerU’s videos are enormously popular, and YouTube makes money when people watch videos. Moreover, PragerU’s videos are among the most high-quality, intellectually sound productions on YouTube. Nevertheless, YouTube (which is owned by Google) has tried to suppress traffic to PragerU’s products. PragerU has sued Google as a result. So this is the latest: Facebook has shadow banned PragerU into complete silence to its more than 3 million followers, internal analytics revealed. “Our last 9 posts have been completely censored reaching 0 of our 3 million followers,” PragerU media personality Will Witt… Read more »

Sentient
Sentient
3 years ago

Gee… One of the ICANN board members works for the Center for Democracy and Technology.

That sure sounds nice and safe.

I’m sure it’s not funded by a cabal of Globalist Equalists right?

https://cdt.org/financials/

Oh wait….

But really they will give Rollo the benefit of doubt right? Surely he isn’t a hateful misogynist oppressor…

kfg
kfg
3 years ago

“PragerU’s videos are enormously popular, and YouTube makes money when people watch videos.”

Get woke, go broke.

ollieoxenfree1
ollieoxenfree1
3 years ago

“Listening to this woman’s concerns, it’s a fairly common refutation and one we come to expect from a mindset that presumes men callously objectify women out of hand, or due to their being taught to be so by a chauvinistic toxic masculinity.” The women put forth in the article, namely Renee Sommerfield and Cheryl Sandberg are wearing an inordinate amount of make-up. False eye lashes, painted eyebrows, primer, foundation ( in Sandberg’s case) and lip gloss. Women have become the bright lights of an amusement arcade and we, men, little children staring in gaped awe. A woman doesn’t apply this… Read more »

Anonymous Reader
Anonymous Reader
3 years ago

Sentient
YouTube makes loses money slower when people watch videos

FIFY.

YouTube loses megabux per annum. That’s why trying to replace it is a bad idea.

Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

Private companies/corporations.

Privatization is always good, r right?

SJF
SJF
3 years ago
Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

Charles Koch is part of a cabal?

ollieoxenfree1
3 years ago

@Lisa August 16 20:08

A point well made. Reproduction is a right most of us shouldn’t exercise.

ollieoxenfree1
3 years ago

@Lisa August 16 20:08

A point well made. Reproduction is a right most us shouldn’t exercise.

SJF
SJF
3 years ago

“Charles Koch is part of a cabal?” He’s pretty much throwing money down the drain. Good thing he’s got plenty of it. He’s just playing…. https://youtu.be/pkFJvHepN2g Quotes from the movie Watchers: Dan Dreiberg: What happened to us? What happened to the American Dream? Edward Blake: “What happened to the American Dream?” It came true! You’re lookin’ at it… Dr. Manhattan: They claim their labors are to build a heaven, yet their heaven is populated by horrors. Perhaps the world is not made. Perhaps nothing is made. A clock without a craftsman. It’s too late. Always has been, always will be.… Read more »

kfg
kfg
3 years ago

The American Dream was gutted by the American Dream(tm).

The American Dream was to own your own land and take your living from it, so that, no matter how poor, you were beholden to no man.

Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

Okay, what I find interesting, is that a large constituency of Americans ” say ” that in the capitalist utopian ideal, it’s good to make more money than anyone could spend/use in a hundred lifetimes. Guys get hard ons over the notion and rally up cheering. I got it. But what comes along with the narrowing of ” deserving candidates “, a shrinking number compared to the whole, is the emassing of ” power “. In America, money = power. Power and money trump morals or history or nationalism or patriotism. I got it. The wealthy battle with their different… Read more »

Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

Oh, I forgot to add that I don’t have a father ( my dad’s gonna be missed ) so I lack morals and direction.

That about covers it.

SJF
SJF
3 years ago

“Yup. Some.real bullshit on the web. Maybe somebody might start overreacting in correction.” So, what you are saying Blax is that you are getting triggered by douche-bags. “I have never, ever read one word on Trm that I think is offensive.” You know. You know. Why that is. Because you place too much importance on top down. Red pill has always been bottoms up. These top down things you invest yourself in? Vast Pendulums trying to suck you in their vortex. They work so can your young boys. Work. The trick is for your young men, you counsel, is to… Read more »

Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

Sjf I don’t get ” triggered “. That’s the latest internet speak flavor.😁 I am teaching young men the Game, and they seem to be starving for it. But I demand that they understand and focus their energies on something outside of themselves because isolation within society is a plan for making better puppets. They don’t particularly need rugged individualism just yet, they need understanding of the playing field in 2018, the entire field, and they must get in the game in the greatest capacity that they can muster. Or wither on the vine and did a cowards death. Period.… Read more »

Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

That’s ” die a coward’s death.. “.

Anonymous Reader
Anonymous Reader
3 years ago

Blaximus
Fascist authoritarianism

I bet you cannot define that term.

I don’t get ” triggered “.

Yeah, you do.

SJF
SJF
3 years ago

“I don’t get ” triggered “. That’s the latest internet speak flavor.”

Of course you don’t. The young men do. And that’s the age old wisdom of the Stoics.

Not a criticism of you Blax. Just I’ve observed too much lack of uncle guidance for the young men these days.

Careful parsing of the narrative for them is needed.

Anonymous Reader
Anonymous Reader
3 years ago

Blaximus
As far as equating ( equalist???) Rollo with these other sites, you never know what people will do, but there is this: you can tell truths and inform without hatefully disparaging.

Doesn’t matter anymore. Pay attention to what’s going on.

I have never, ever read one word on Trm that I think is offensive.there is a difference.

So what?

Anonymous Reader
Anonymous Reader
3 years ago

kfg
The American Dream was gutted by the American Dream(tm).

Yep. That was pretty close to Libertopia. It did not last for a lot of reasons.

For example, there was a time when Fenimore Cooper’s books were best sellers, read by most people. Now they are too advanced for a lot of college students; big words, long sentences, no pictures. Reasons…

Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

Just my perspective and opinion. I’m of the belief that the shit talking bullies deserve an ass whooping. Yeah, they have freedom of speech and blah blah blah, but if people widely accept consequences for exercising rights, no one, at the end of the day, is exempt. But it’s natural to hate it when ” your team ” loses. Again, people as a whole week unable to discern ” hate ” when they see it ( a curious development in itself ). It’s like in revelations in the bible when it speaks of men not knowing right from wrong. That… Read more »

SJF
SJF
3 years ago

“But I demand that they understand and focus their energies on something outside of themselves because isolation within society is a plan for making better puppets. They don’t particularly need rugged individualism just yet, they need understanding of the playing field in 2018, the entire field, and they must get in the game in the greatest capacity that they can muster.” I bet to differ. Every red pill advancement I’ve come to has been realizing the deficiencies in my self. Masculine self improvement, along with help from The Tribe of Men. Rugged individualism has been my redemption. But, then again:… Read more »

Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

Sjf

I.I’m not teaching these men red pill. They have much bigger fish to fry and 99% of them haven’t been blue pilled brainwaahed.

Lol, that shit is a luxury.

Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

Re: playing fields. There are definitely playing fields. The problem is understanding how to get in the field and the how to play. For many men, not understanding there is a game afoot, and it’s played within artificial constraints, prevents them from even suiting up.

They do have limitations until they can identify what they arr, why they are, and how to attack them. Not grasping this is a limitation.

kfg
kfg
3 years ago

” . . . there was a time when Fenimore Cooper’s books were best sellers . . .”

It happens that last week I was asked to do a one off lecture on the expansion of the American frontier. What I actually did was frame the subject in terms of the meta-narrative of the Knickerbocker Tales.

No one in the audience, despite being older and all having been to Cooperstown and the reconstruction of Fort William Henry, had read a single one of the books. Not even Last of the Mohicans, which was set locally.

Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

As for me personally, nah, I had to be taught. I had to rely on men that had already been down the road to point the way, and tell me where the potholes and forms were and how I could handle these things. Individualism came later. You have to know what You are being ” individual ” from. Thatn” skies the limit ” thing came with experiences. I’d never tell a young minority person that the sky is the limit right off, because there are limitations. If they cannot identify them, they’ll never get around them. That’s the plan, to… Read more »

SJF
SJF
3 years ago

“They have much bigger fish to fry and 99% of them haven’t been blue pilled brainwashed.” Fair enough. But how many of them are getting “fucked over” by life and “the authorities”. And using that as an excuse to not be the best representation of themselves? How are you not merely trying to get them through “denial, anger, bargaining and depression”. ? I never got blue pill brain-washed. I did get beholden to outside forces. And Beta-tized. You did too by Oprah-Ization. One of my buddies caught me in a lie a couple years about what-the-fuck-I-was-going-through back then. He sent… Read more »

SJF
SJF
3 years ago

“Thatn” skies the limit ” thing came with experiences. I’d never tell a young minority person that the sky is the limit right off, because there are limitations. If they cannot identify them, they’ll never get around them. That’s the plan, to make you take yourself outgoings game and off the field because you’ve done no due diligence for life and the structures you have never been exposed to. So what you are saying is that there are limitations? You are wrong. Dammit Blaximus you aren’t, there, telling your’re life’s realizations. To you’re own heart/soul be true. You know and… Read more »

SJF
SJF
3 years ago

“Not about my ego.”

It’s about the FI’s ego.

Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

Sjf Trust, I’m not lying to these young men. If they listen to ” systemic dictum “, that’s where they lies lie. Most of them aren’t angry at all, don’t feel down, or any of that. Shanghai want and need are straight, no bullshit realistic answers. Example: a prosecutor/da was on stage. The discussion centered around sentencing disparities with graphs and charts and videos and shit. I said.my piece,.a.few other speakers said their piece, and we took some questions. A young highly muscles man stepped up to the Mike and asked the prosecutor – ” where do you live? “,… Read more »

rugby11
rugby11
3 years ago

The female form

eb9d772c874feac873b7b4493?nk=530e0db737a82fcd88f4506039bca3ee-1534651514

Motherhood and being Female
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/06/28/u-s-women-are-postponing-motherhood-but-not-as-much-as-those-in-most-other-developed-nations/

SJF
SJF
3 years ago

“I don’t know sjf. This is a bit beyond my ability while holding down a full time job. I’ve sounded the alarm for help at this point, but I don’t want many of the current drop of ” leaders ” because if they could actually lead, these young men wouldn’t be in this predicament in the first place. Funny thing though, I never a ton of support from a lot of law enforcement that attends. Even though I tell men to do whatever they have to hold officers and brass accountable. Evidently they listen beyond that point.” The best thing… Read more »

SJF
SJF
3 years ago

Oh, forgot the last stanza:

“Goin’ down to Monte Carlo, 25k from nice
Goin’ down, goin’ down to Monte Carlo, still about 25k from nice
Got to get my head showered, got to find some release”….

Release from constraint.

God forbid, the ultimate masculine ecstasy. Makes men go to war.

SJF
SJF
3 years ago
Pinelero
Pinelero
3 years ago

100 steps ahead almost like it was a script. Hard to tell who are the useful idiots now-days.

Roused
Roused
3 years ago

“YouTube loses megabux per annum” It’s a loss leader….maybe. Google makes it money off search. They can afford to lose a hundred mil or so. Would it be better for their overall business to cede all those eyeballs to another company? Not hardly. Google knows Facebook has in some ways a better ad platform and they are kissing ass right now with advertisers and publishers to maintain the status quo. This company has not been very innovative since it developed it’s search engine. It has acquired almost more than it has built. AdSense, Doubleclick Bid Manager and Doubleclick for Publishers… Read more »

Roused
Roused
3 years ago

@Palma “Publicly confirming that he did indeed shut down and deny people their free speech because he more or less didn’t like/agree with what was being said. Facebook doesn’t actually infringe on American citizens free speech in the way you think it does. They are only preventing people who use their free service to post on Facebook, not our right to speak, publish etc… on your own. One can start your own blog, site or create a deadwood edition and they can’t stop you. Sure it’s obviously shitty what they do, but most then why should any of us be… Read more »

Roused
Roused
3 years ago

“He needs to because he has to release the lefts hold on the narrative before the next election. It’s just another part of his war on the media.” Don’t get your hopes up on that. The Left controls the large majority of the media. And don’t be so sure that “Right” leaning media is necessarily better. The Matrix is the Matrix and it’s more convoluted than you might think. When was the last time you read in conservative mainstream media anything about the nature of the Federal Reserve? How well did the mainstream media inform the public about the discovery… Read more »

Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

New Jersey.

Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

1975 – 2018

rugby11
rugby11
3 years ago

Listen to all other segments
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yL8rVbWniW4
Has balls of steel

IAS
IAS
3 years ago

@KFG: off-topic but I’d like to know your take on this study.

IAS
IAS
3 years ago

@KFG
Posted by accident without linking.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/article/PIIS2468-2667(18)30135-X/fulltext

the findings are reportedly that low carb diets have lower life expectancy than having about 50% carb intake.

kfg
kfg
3 years ago

At a quick look over, it would have been difficult for them to have constructed a lower data quality methodology. Cross cultural observational meta-study, self-reported, reporting only over a small fraction of the term of the observation. The potential for bad data and confounders is huuuuge. The maximum range in lifespan difference between people who were already of advanced age (over 50) was only 4 years. We’re not looking at lives cut tragically short. The only metric for “health” was all cause mortality.l I find that pretty meaningless without knowing the actual cause of death and the circumstances of it.… Read more »

Roused
Roused
3 years ago

“But there aren’t many men like Trump. Posdibly 25-50 on the planet have his combination of intelligence, street smart and balls.” Trump is just another flavor of what we’ve had before, except he is making more noise with his tweets and irreverent comments that piss off the left and the politically correct. Trump is not making America great by smashing the Matrix, he is just the latest elected player in the larger scheme. Don’t ever expect a federally elected official to try and smash the Matrix, it will crush that individual without remorse. While there are certain tactics and rhetoric… Read more »

IAS
IAS
3 years ago

@KFG: even assuming there is a correlation, I did suspect it could be a correlation but not causation thing, that people eating more protein are leading more active lives which are riskier (for example, which you also mentioned).

Unfortunately with things being so muddled with funding for research often coming with conflicts of interest built-in, I can’t even count on there being a true correlation.

Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

Plant based carb sources of ” fats ” vs refined carbs.

kfg
kfg
3 years ago

This is a picture of red meat:

comment image

This is not:

comment image

But the latter is often reported as if it were former.

Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

Roused Time reveals all, always. People thinking trump is highly intelligent aside, let’s look at one example gleaned from observing trump up close for 40 years. He had ownership of a USFL team for a period of time. There’s a documentary out there somewhere that was made long before he thought about running for President. Anyway, the USFL for trump was a stepping stone to gain entry into the NFL as an owner. When the USFL folded up, trump was his opportunity to realize his goal. He went to purchase the buffalo bills with reportedly a billion dollars cash money.… Read more »

Sentient
Sentient
3 years ago

Blax

That’s just retarded. Trump never filed personal bankruptcy. So he always had assets. Corporate assets are not personal assets.

He lost equity in the corporate bankruptcies. That’s how that work. Creditor debt is restructured at the expense of equity.

You personal animus is showing.

Sentient
Sentient
3 years ago

Since Ike only repubs to have won NY are Reagan (twice) and Nixon (once).

Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

Sentient

It’s true I don’t care for trump, but that’s been true since the 80s. My view is based on my personal observation and isn’t politically/ideologically based like a lot of the anti-trump noise out there.

And if course, he’d have to be a complete moron to go into personal bankruptcies over operational malfeasance.😁

So the ” animus ” you speak of has been around forever and isn’t fully related to his election to office.

Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

…Reagan and Nixon weren’t from queens/ new York either.

Sentient
Sentient
3 years ago

Blax

Yeah you’re basing your opinion on how you feel about him, his personality. Not his platform or policies.

As a Reactionary Progressive you like his policies…

Now since you know he’d be a moron to use all his own assets, you know that his personal assets were never at issue. So there is no “mystery money” to look for. It’s always been on the rest of his balance sheet.

Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

Lol.

Labels. Not reflective of me personally. True: the way I feel about him has been forged over observing his actions over time.

Policy, I am still waiting for clarification and actions for the most part. I hear him though.

I’m not a ” progressive “. I’m not a slave to any ideology or political idea. I abhor extremist of any ilk.

Funny, I haven’t ever spoken of my personal political view, because it’s not as important as other aspect, so do me a solid bro, don’t ascribe boilerplate definitions on me without knowing what my actual stances are.😁

Roused
Roused
3 years ago

Blax,

All that is just noise is in the machine. None of it really matters.

Sure, we as red pill men are probably better off in the short term with Trump in office rather than Hillary. But big picture in the long run…doesn’t matter. The Matrix is the Matrix and a president is not going to change it. In fact, the dynamics of how this country operates will not alllow for an individual to make any significant change. Window dressing sure, but not fundamental change.

lendhispeaks
3 years ago

Just gonna leave this right here about that noted she-devil Asia Argento:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/19/us/asia-argento-assault-jimmy-bennett.html

Can you imagine if the roles were reversed and a man pulled this???

Sentient
Sentient
3 years ago

Blax

don’t ascribe boilerplate definitions on me without knowing what my actual stances are.

We’ve covered this before. If it looks, walks and quacks… smart money is on it being a duck. It can call itself whatever it wants.

rugby11
rugby11
3 years ago

Some interested reads

Men And Women Found More Similar Than Portrayed In Popular Media
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/09/050919082317.htm

Intuitive, extraverted and spontaneous women are the best choice for leading creative people
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/08/170802083314.htm

People prefer leaders with more masculine voices, even in feminine leadership roles
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/12/121212205606.htm

Sentient
Sentient
3 years ago

Rollo has a link on Twitter from one of the scammed guys…

http://gothamist.com/2018/08/20/dudes_duped_in_tinder_scam.php

Too funny.

Sentient
Sentient
3 years ago

Zeus send 🔥

These thirsty fags competed for her…

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oas2rfESbZ4

Lol

Sentient
Sentient
3 years ago

http://gothamist.com/attachments/arts_jen/82018Moonman.jpg

Now I’m 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Sentient
Sentient
3 years ago

On the Asia Argento thing… Suspect this was the straw that broke Bourdain’s neck. When he found out it was true.

Sentient
Sentient
3 years ago

comment image

This…

Blaximus
Blaximus
3 years ago

Tinder and Instagram and a half dozen other sites will prosper greatly as long as guys cannot get their thirst under control.

Lol. 1 chick used all of these guys. No wonder the FI is very formidable.

If 3 dudes would’ve showed up in union square, we wouldn’t be reading this and her dig about ” toxic masculinity ” would have attracted barely a handful of eyeballs.

But now…..

rugby11
rugby11
3 years ago

Peecocking are humanity with clothes Eyes and skin muscle and everything in between. https://www.thoughtco.com/evolution-of-eye-color-1224778 War culture leadership and Trauma “Something cultural happened 8,000 years ago that’s marked us even today.” https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success Males and Culture-it would be one of the first instances that scientists have found of culture affecting human evolution. “The team uncovered this dip-and-rise in the male-to-female reproductive ratio by looking at DNA from more than 450 volunteers from seven world regions. Geneticists analyzed two parts of the DNA, Y-chromosome DNA and mitochondrial DNA. These don’t make up a large portion of a person’s genetics, but they’re special because… Read more »

rugby11
rugby11
3 years ago

Damn i meant https://bit.ly/2PnwNOp “Geodakyan’s evolutionary theory of sex Geodakyan suggested that sexual dimorphism provides a partitioning of a species’ phenotypes into at least two functional partitions: a female partition that secures beneficial features of the species and a male partition that emerged in species with more variable and unpredictable environments. The male partition is suggested to be an “experimental” part of the species that allows the species to expand their ecological niche, and to have alternative configurations. This theory underlines the higher variability and higher mortality in males, in comparison to females. This functional partitioning also explains the higher… Read more »

The Silver FoX
The Silver FoX
3 years ago

Don’t know if this was missed in the ‘sphere, but it’s certainly a tasty expose of the skanky Asia Argento, and confirms Bourdain as a totally pathetic, blue pilled pussy… “Italian actress and director Asia Argento was among the first women in the movie business to publicly accuse producer Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault. She became a leading figure in the #MeToo movement. Her boyfriend, culinary television star Anthony Bourdain, eagerly joined the fight. But in the months that followed her revelations about Weinstein last October, Argento quietly arranged to pay $US380,000 to her own accuser: Jimmy Bennett, a young… Read more »

rugby11
rugby11
3 years ago

Question (Has anyone gotten into a threesome with a mother and Daugther?) I ran into this Girl who has helped serve an a research project I’ve been a part of. She has been gone for 2 years her mother moved to Colorado with her Dad who i got a long with because i enjoy sailing. When i saw her come up i was waiting to get to Yoga. She was beautiful and does a great deal of work with people who have less to give than she has. What im wondering about is being attracted to her and her mom.… Read more »

foxguy148
foxguy148
3 years ago

On the Tinder chick, that’s Amazing, look at all the guys she convinced to go, fucking thirsty! Funny , yet a canary in the coal mine with regards to the state of guys now days. Crazy amount of choice there for her, I have to conclude peak hypergamy. She is a 5 or 6 on a good day, it’s what I keep alluding to with regards to guys slaving away for a mere chance with 3 or 4, it’s crazy. It’s like I am taking crazy pills, even when blue pill, I would only put effort into actual good looking… Read more »

SJF
SJF
3 years ago

What is the opposite of LOL? Regarding the Miss America Pageant thing? (Paging Rollo to participate,,,) We all know whats going on here with Gretchen Carlson and the board. They want to egalitarian equalize the board of the Miss America. Turn the girls into strong women. To masculinize them and lecture, hector and harass them into being strong independent women. Rather than what Miss America’s mission is. To celebrate and reward femininity. And the beauty of being feminine. Former Miss America participants were rewarded for winning the beauty contest. They are coming to criticize the change in direction. Good for… Read more »

SJF
SJF
3 years ago

Regarding the question asked by AIS about the Lancet study on nutrition. There is no way a meta-study can account for the mental and physical retards involved in the study. KFG had some good points. I can read studies like that, but I’m not research based and it takes too much of my well earned free-exess-energy to delve into that shit. It is Pendulum based. Top down medical social engineering and backed by biases. The researchers even state their wealth payment by biased pharmaceutical companies. Bottom line: General Health Research Studies give a Bell Curve. This one showed and inverse… Read more »

rugby11
rugby11
3 years ago
kfg
kfg
3 years ago

To tell you the truth, I’m having trouble simply paying attention to it, never mind thinking about it.

kfg
kfg
3 years ago

Well, at least that’s one I haven’t heard before.

SJF
SJF
3 years ago

“Well, at least that’s one I haven’t heard before. Yesterday, a patient I hadn’t seen in a while came in. I had saved his life before (a couple melanomas). He and his cabal of brace beaglers had sold me my wildlife habitat farm 13 years ago. He upon seeing me said: “….You look great! You haven’t aged at all. You’re like Dorian Gray” I haven’t heard that one before…. Nor did I know who the fictional Dorian Gray actually was. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorian_Gray_(2009_film) “Gray meets and falls in love with budding young actress, Sibyl Vane. After a few weeks, he proposes marriage… Read more »

SJF
SJF
3 years ago

@PalmaSailor

That was an offhand inside joke:

https://youtu.be/EmzM0bz3PWc

The guy actually saved my life from being zeroed out by selling me my “farm”. It became the beginning of a quest (hero’s journey) to save me from my self. It worked really well.

He himself was, and is, a smooth operator. As you are too PalmaSailor.

mersonia
3 years ago

loool ya’ll have been going back and forth over the same convos for 3 years LOLOLOL

trackback

[…] Rollo Tomassi, The Myth of the Alpha Female on The Rational Male (August 2018).] The terminology I am going to propose solves this problem […]

Allen
Allen
3 years ago

So what is the end goal for this Feminine Imperative? Why do they fool these women in believing they will be happier by taking a male stance in life?

trackback

[…] The Rational Male’s “The Myth Of The Alpha Female” […]

kfg
kfg
3 years ago

“So what is the end goal for this Feminine Imperative?” Sexual reproduction for the continuation of life. Just like the Male Imperative. “Why do they fool these women in believing they will be happier by taking a male stance in life?” You have changed the subject to ideological movement. The FI is not an idea. It is biologically innate. Female lions and tigers and bears (Oh my!), as well as ants and termites and bees, have an FI. You must understand this if you are to understand behavior, not just of women, but your own, and you must understand your… Read more »

SJF
SJF
3 years ago

“Power, same as it ever was.” @Allen, the more power that has been handed over to the FI so females can do what they are programmed to do, the more they will use those powers. The more they have those powers, the less they want to give those powers up. There is a well circulated chapter of Practical Female Psychology for the Practical Man by Joseph W. South and Franco Google search for” “Stages of Manipulation”; an excerpt from the book “Practical Female Psychology”. (I don’t put a link because it will likely come as a reddit link. Read the… Read more »

X
X
3 years ago

@Cole – Yes you’re right that a lot of the Hard life stuff has been Softened, largely due to mens contributions over time – which even though not acknowledged are used and enjoyed by Feminism. Hard Truth. The question is how will variety & diversity of Men react overall as a collective over the coming years & decades in terms of Blue vs Red to realize they’ve been used & duped and since technology has made things easier & softer and they are now more and more expendable. And how will variety of women behave and play as time passes.… Read more »

519
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
%d bloggers like this: