Way back in the early years of this blog I wrote a post flipping a common feminist trope on its head. In Women’s Physical Standards I laid out the case that it is women, not men, who hold the most stringent and static standards for ideal male beauty.
…from a purely physical perspective, it is women’s idealized masculine form that hasn’t changed in millennia. While there may have been a Rubenesque period when men loved the fatties of the 1600′s, no such era ever existed for women’s physical preferences. The classic broad chest, wide shoulders, six-pack abs and squared jaws of greco-roman athleticism are still the idealized male form that has graced EVERY romance novel cover in existence. I’m still waiting for someone to post me a link for a dating site that caters exclusively to women’s fetish of BBMs – Big Beautiful Men – average to good looking, fit, women specifically looking overweight men. Executive Introductions caters to women seeking affluent, influential men, but women just looking for overweight men, that site doesn’t exist.
I wrote this essay in a time well before apps like Tinder and Bumble became household names. Since then (September, 2011) the sexual marketplace has fundamentally shifted to exactly the state I saw it going to then, and all it took to prove it was a handful of fucking ‘dating’ apps to facilitate Hypergamy. In 8 years women have proven they are every bit as viscerally motivated by men’s physical appeal as I spelled out in this post. Back then I was run up the flagpole for suggesting women were the ones with “unrealistic beauty standards”, now it seem matter of fact.
Of course, the double standard has gotten much worse with respect to men having any sexual selection standards. In Maryland we have the instance of high school boys being pilloried on a global stage for daring to rate their female classmates’ looks on a 1 to 10 scale. Ironically, the the same teen girls who took such offense to this will think nothing of swiping left or right on a potentially lover on Tinder in just a few short years. In fact, they’ll think it’s normal for a woman to base her sexual selection on the physical, yet the same is sexual objectification for men to do the same. Certainly, men will never be allowed to voice their physical preferences without the fear of personal destruction in our Global Village.
About 5-6 months ago, Pat Campbell, my co-host on Red Pill 101, linked me to a pair of stories about how offensive some social justice warriors found it that young men were avoiding trans-gender ‘girls‘ as potential dates. The logic was that more evolved heterosexual young men should feel attraction towards a trans-gender, biological male, if he was presenting himself as a female. The natural sexual selection process for those young men, and by extension all men, was being circumvented by the social imperatives of others.
Pat also linked me to a story where a popular, heterosexual, high school quarterback accepted the Homecoming Dance proposal of another homosexual young man. As expected, the story was written as a heartwarming victory for modern progressivism and a young man “secure in his masculinity” praised as a hero for essentially accepting a social control over his sexual selection process. Naturally, the predictable hate to overcome would be from ‘less evolved’ guys alleging the quarterback was really gay.
This is the pre-written script we expect will follow (the clichéd triumph over homophobia), but the real story here is that a young man’s sexual selection process has been removed from his direct control. If the quarterback had refused the proposal the best he could hope for would be that no story would be written about it – but the more likely story would be him having to defend himself against his homophobia. In essence, the threat of a global online mob ruining his future makes accepting the proposal a necessity.
In 2019 men’s control over their sexual selectivity is something women don’t want to hear about. Part of ensuring that Hypergamy is the defining social dynamic today includes exercising as much control over men’s sexual selection process as possible. As fluid as men’s selection naturally is, it’s still out of women’s total control. The method to that control is social pressure. Women’s need to insure against their own Existential Fear of pairing with an unacceptable guy is so obsessive they will resort to social engineering.
Tinder and Bumble are social engineering programs as much as they are facilitators of women’s Hypergamy. Body Positivity / Fat Acceptance (exclusively for women) is equally a social conditioning effort. But for these and more the latent purpose is the same – convincing men to repress their evolved sexual selection proclivities in favor of accepting women’s selection process as the ‘correct’ one. The Cardinal Rule of Sexual Strategies states that for on sex’s strategy to succeed the other’s must be compromised or abandoned. In today’s feminine-primary social order, the Feminine Imperative wants nothing less than complete abandonment from men – and it will use every social and political means available to insure men do.
Men must be raised up and conditioned from the earliest age to accept women’s strategy and their role in it as the only acceptable one. Men’s selection of a mate must be made for him according to women’s standards. Many times I’m asked how to go about “vetting for a wife”. I’m asked what the criteria, what aspects, what traits should a woman possess to make her “marriage material”. From a Red Pill perspective a lot of what I lay out seems highly offensive to the sensibilities of men and women conditioned by the Feminine Imperative. But the qualities, and the reasons I define them being desirable, are nothing any man who is invested in his own sexual strategy wouldn’t find mundane.
It’s not difficult to figure out what attributes in women would make for a good pairing – what’s offensive is that a man would ever have the temerity to require a woman to possess them at all.
It’s offensive to feminized sensibilities for a man to speak aloud the things he wants from a woman. How dare he ever have the presence of mind to create a list of acceptable qualities for a potential long term mate. Who is he to make demands? Has he not learned that Hypergamy and women’s needs now define his existence?
I’ve written in the past about how women commodify their own sexuality. We’ve pandered to the security needs of women for so long they feel entitled to their being met. We’ve developed a social order that’s prime directive is to insure against women’s Existential Fear of ever having to worry about a bad Hypergamous decision. We ensure that they can voluntarily reproduce at will via sperm banks and frozen eggs. We demand that men find them arousing no matter what their physical condition and in spite of 100,000 years of evolved arousal cues. Gynocentrism demands men be nothing more than willing participants in women’s sexual / life strategies.
A day ago I posted this quote on Twitter:
Women and their ‘allies’ lost their collective minds. Follow that link, see for yourself. It’s a litany of middle school blathering and presumption about my motives for making public what most of these feminists confirmed. All the responses are the predictable boilerplate you’d expect from a generation of women used to parroting back what the Village has taught them to respond with for so long.
But what is my observation revealing here? Nothing that we don’t already know – women define the reproductive process in western culture. And again, most of these feminists proudly agree with the observation. They say, “Yeah, as it should be”, while their oblivious male ‘allies’ seek affirmation.
The boys at the Maryland high school got caught in the gynocratic gears. They weren’t properly conditioned to know their place. They did what most guys in high school do, they compare notes, they make comparisons, because they still believed they might be allowed to have a preference of who they want to date, bang, have for a girlfriend, have for a wife. How dare they!
When the Beta Bucks / provisioning side of the Hypergamous equation is more or less accommodated for by the social order the only thing left is Alpha Fucks. This is Hypergamy on a meta-scale. Why would any woman bother with the notion of Value Added to make herself more ‘marriageable’? Men aren’t allowed to have preferences. They should feel lucky that a woman would date them in the first place. Feminism has taught her that if she is to be the ideal Strong Independent Woman® she is “never to do anything for the express pleasure of a man.” And besides, the exciting guys, the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys who she does swipe right on; those guys don’t care about ‘value added’ – they care about fucking.
The New Polyandry I described is an extension of ensuring women’s Existential Fear is always compensated for on a societal level.
The goal of feminism is to remove all constraints on female sexuality while maximally restricting male sexuality.
Roissy
I’ve quoted this in other essays. Usually I’m asked why this would at all be feminists goal?
“You think feminism is all about controlling your dicks?”
In essence, yes, but really it’s about affording women unilateral control over their Existential Fear and absolving them of any consequences for the bad decisions made in controlling for it. In the last essay I stated that Abortion is Eugenics, but isn’t affording women total control of human reproduction eugenics? Isn’t socially engineering and conditioning men’s behavior to accept women’s sexual strategy as the “correct”, normal one eugenics as well?
I would say yes, except, the Sisterhood doesn’t have a ‘master race’ planned. There is no uniform conscious direction to this eugenics. It’s all driven by women natural, evolved mental firmware and impulses – all facilitated by the power afforded to them by men. We’ve unfettered Hypergamy. We’ve allowed women to do something unprecedented in human history, we’ve given women the reins of the direction of human reproduction.
And we’ve done this at the same time we’ve maximally restricted male sexuality. Dr. Jordan Peterson once predicted that in the future any expression of male sexuality will be illegal. I would amend that: any Beta male expression of sexuality will be deemed offensive or illegal.
Sorta related to the topic of this post- but focusing on why feminism is far more rampant in some countries than others which are outwardly similar. Hope to write a second post in this series soon..
https://dissention.wordpress.com/2019/03/21/on-the-peculiar-connection-between-systemic-racism-and-feminism-1/
Weirdly – if women managed via this process of social engineering to perfect their hyergamic strategy whereby they only fuck with the top 10% of alpha males and allow the remainding 90% of cucked men to raise their offspring (the packhorses), wouldn’t this be a good thing for the human race from a purely Darwinian perspective? Don’t the females of every species of life on earth do this?
Really didn’t “ideal of male beauty” change? I see big shift of preference from white men to black men. This to me is pretty big change.
@Simonwildcat
I don’t want to live in an ant hill or a beehive. Do you?
Rollo, this is a very timely essay that men should read and then re-read. Thanks for the work you do.
I remember being taught in 2001 that rating girls was sexual harassment. Confusing, because then I got to university and people rated girls. I concluded, rightly, that it was fine.
The quarterback in the story is Gay and if he isn’t he Fucking should be.
But all of this can blown out of the water through genuine masculine, confident alpha behaviour.
So gents, the solution is simple, learn some wuality game, now!
And honestly, i cant blame the girls for hating beta behaviour and putting policies to discourage it happening.
If i was a chick i couldnt imagine anything more creepy and pathetic then have a beta male try to chat me up – off with his head !
@Rollo: are we ready for the sequel to the great looks debate? My take on it to start it off. Absent anything else, women do have a “looks ideal”. It is not 100% uniform, but certainly not “dad bods”, and certainly preference for tall over short etc., mostly they center around the lean with 6-pack type (think Brad Pitt in his prime), but there are e.g. a sizable minority who are actually into the huge bodybuilder type (think Arnie in his prime) etc. But other alpha traits trump that in person, Game over looks etc. I think we all pretty… Read more »
True story….Before I discovered the Red Pill and Game I always thought I wasn’t “allowed” to go for the hottest girl in the club, bar or whatever social situation I was in.
Instead I played it “cool” going for the ugly friend to show I was “open-minded”. As ridiculous as this line of thinking is…it was my go-to rationalization for NOT approaching.
Off topic but worth sharing…. “Boardroom bandits only too quick to shoot messenger” The Australian (National, Australia). (Mar. 30, 2019) by Janet Albrechtsen No wonder a select group of powerful women piled on when their little ruse was rumbled Hell hath no fury like a woman outed as a member of a cosy, lucrative little boardroom club. Spare a thought for former competition tsar Graeme Samuel, who this week pointed out that the walls built around an exclusive group of female board members were so impenetrable only a nuclear bomb could blow it open to other women. Going by the… Read more »
In that long string of tweets this one stands out:
This tweet screams “I never read the book, but I saw the movie.” It was James Whale who made the Creature strong and simple, not Mary Shelley.
Its true, in the book Frankenstein (the creature) isn’t simple minded. He’s a brooding, murderous psychopath, who’s also inhumanly strong. I think Mary Shelley may have inadvertently revealed what women actually desire in a man.
Any news about YaReally? Did he disappear for good?
Another excellant read Rolllo. Knowing what I know now about society, the feminine imperitive and what I learnt off Prostitutes (trust me, you get the unfettered, hypergamous truth off an Escort) my mindset has totally changed towards women and how I see myself as a man in the world. I have not become a MGTOW. I date women and I want to have sex with 80% of the women I meet. That’s biological. But now I have an indifference towards women no matter if she is a 5 or she is a 10 bikini model. I am no longer a… Read more »
Is the power given to women now really “unprecedented in human history”? I highly doubt it. This seems to be actually what happens in every civilization, society, village of human apes in one form or another. Those societies and civilizations that gave women more and more power to choose DID NOT SURVIVE. Where do you think the idea of arranged marriages and shame based socities of the past come from? That did not come from nowhere, it came directly in response to women’s hypergamous choices. The thing that has changed is technology amplifying that hypergamy and state power repressing the… Read more »
Anyone else hoping the new “online” “offline” features were just an April first thing?
“Women and their ‘allies’ lost their collective minds.”
That^^ is indicative of what nonsense men deal with. This is not an indication of collective strength. It is a group shit test flail to be ignored.
There is NOTHING to fear about feminists and their ilk. They have neither the mental wherewithal to tolerate the verbal truth and in the unspoken SMP they fare even worse. Hence the outrage. These people are unhappy and unlucky.
Don’t play the outrage game and you’ll be happier and more successful.
From Rollo’s twatter…
https://www.mtlblog.com/news/montreal/montreals-concordia-university-is-warning-students-about-suspicious-strangers-harassing-females-on-campus
Careful playas!
Excellent insights, as usual, Rollo. As individual men, though, there isn’t much we can do to change the system as it is. Being aware of it is important, of course, and so that’s always useful — situational and environmental understanding is a key to success. But beyond that, focusing on this stuff tends to detrimental to success, because it proves to be a big distraction that is not relevant at all, really, on the micro (i.e., personal) level in terms of reaching the goals you personally have in your own life. So understand this stuff well, file it in your… Read more »
https://www.instagram.com/tv/Bvm2KE_jmHT/
Problem glasses… noted!
Comments…
swed_lifestyle
I know who is this guy, it’s just an autist chinees who want to get lay and check up pick up artiste on youtube, he just akward on socialising because he’s little bit retarded so he use proces of precise questions cause he don’t know what to do when its out of this conversation
swed_lifestyle
Its not humain trafiking but just some dumb fuckers who trying get laid
@Rollo – Great essay, but I still have a fundamental disagreement with you boiling all this down to “existential fears”. We have mating strategies – failing at them can cause fear. But the underlying motivation isn’t fear, it’s the desire to fuck and pair up and reproduce. Would love to hear a substantive response to this critique. I actually think seeing this as an “existential fear” is Blue Pill thinking. Other points… As you note, women do not have a gameplan or an endpoint as a political or social force, just as none of the other SJW victim groups do.… Read more »
” . . . the underlying motivation isn’t fear, it’s the desire to fuck and pair up and reproduce.”
I don’t have an existential fear of snakes and leopards, I just have a desire to live.
Kfg beat me to it. “We have mating strategies – failing at them can cause fear.” Non-sentients have mating strategies alone. They don’t fear, as they do not recognize their eventual death. They act on pure instinct alone. They do not have freewilling actions. Sentience renders man aware of his mortality. We understand our death and thus we consciously recognize our decisions are consequential. We have a choice to fuck or not. Our animal drive impels us to fuck but our higher order sentience suppresses the compulsion to rape whomever, whatever, in however way it suits us. For good reason.… Read more »
I cannot tell you how much I appreciate the content you are currently putting out. (Videos included) Not to be greedy, but do we have a release date for Book 4 yet? I honestly want to frame your books and put them on my walls…please take care of yourself!
Since men consciously choose not to get the evo-bio right….sex changes, homosexuality, forcing gender equalism, gay marriage….animals don’t do this, nor think to btw….all man’s downstream consequence is fucked up too.
Grammar then logic then rhetoric.
In that order, skip no steps.
We must be good at being men before all else.
@KFG – I disagree. It turns out the fear of snakes is heritable, it’s also true of other predators that are dangerous to humans. I have a back of the brain reaction to such predators which fires off well ahead of any conscious thought. My encounter with a mountain lion comes to mind, once my brain recognized the silhouette against the dying light of dusk on my lake, my legs started running and I was in fight-flight mode 10 seconds before my conscious mind new what was happening. I don’t have that kind of fear when it comes to mating… Read more »
“It turns out the fear of snakes is heritable, it’s also true of other predators that are dangerous to humans.”
Evo-bio. All’s in order.
“I don’t have that kind of fear when it comes to mating strategy. ”
Really?
Fuck your hb 9++ gf in the front yard recently? No?
Then you do.
The problem is that “beta” is a specific circumstance any man can find himself in, at any time. While it may be the wrong strategy initially, everything leads to beta. Getting married itself is transition to beta, in a way. Any loss of income, power, or fame is transition to beta. Getting sick is beta. Heck Tom Brady will become a beta once he stops playing. Heck witness what happened to Jeff Bezos, apparently becoming a multi billionaire doesn’t protect you from the eventual hypergamous judgment. “Alpha” is being a supremely fit, tall, handsome, confident, genetically superior male with good… Read more »
Animals don’t fear. They react on instinct. So did ScribblerG innitially by the lion. It’s reflexive, though ScribblerG has the capacity to subdue his instincts if needed. That is rational fear as he recognizes the lion mouth on his neck is badness. Irrational fears are consciously chosen fears that aren’t directly threatening. They are in your mind. Like ExCartoonist shunning all women because he got burned in his divorce or ScribblerG and his inability to relate to women beyond cum dumpsters as he too was burned in his divorce….at least here on these pages. I’m not saying women aren’t useful… Read more »
Nobody has anything to say about the gay guy? The both of them being spics would earn them both progressive points in their social circles for gayness. But those social circles are surely patrolled by power-broker dykes. You can’t put a dress on me. That’s black people shit.
So the Chevy Chase girls in the WaPo story and the high school admins are proud of the “consciousness raising” they did of the boys who made the hotness list? They did no such thing. They turned every one of those boys into Trump voters. All of ’em. Even the newly-minted ally who is confabbing (confapping?) with the chief protestress to help “prevent” incidents of future HB list-making by boychiks. (Also she won’t fuck him anyway). Oh they’ll toe the party line in class, at school assemblies. Easy to do with fingers crossed. But at home they’ll flail around and… Read more »
@Eh – ? I never saw women as “cum dumpsters” – I just knocked them off their pedestals. In fact, my approach to game was given by Tyler from RSD and Mystery – you must leave a woman better off than you found them. What I learned is that many, many women want to be sluts, and many are covertly sluts in addition to many who are openly sluts. They aren’t special or fragile, they are just girls. I suspect deep down in my heart that every woman could be a slut under the right circumstances too… I actually appreciate… Read more »
@Revolution – Your vast ignorance and arrogance is only matched by you big mouth. There is so little correct in your statement about Beta and Alpha, I can’t even start to debunk it. I did so in my last post on the last blog piece. You have no idea how to distinguish between Alpha/Beta (terms of social dominance in dominance hierarchies), SMV and looks and how they interplay for sexual selection. Also your paranoid-conspiracy view of the corporate world signals your obvious low social status and lack of interaction with such people. As an executive who operates in the world… Read more »
“But hey, many guys here want to put me in some box of being an animal or a monster…”
Just the opposite.
There are two things of perpetual existential value in your life and I’d bet you dime to dollar you’d even consider giving up yours to save theirs.
Ironically, they are female.
Oh ffs with this guy already .
@ Robert
Hm?
I have a topic request. I’ve never understood why women are soo obsessed with ‘the story’ – meaning, how she met her husband/boyfriend/whatever. I see this emphasis not just with female friends taking every opportunity to tell their ‘story’, but also in media. There’s even a tv show specifically devoted to this – How I Met You Mother (perhaps the ultimate blue pill series ever created).
Women have stolen sex. Put on your penis hats and march to Washington DC.
It must be spring, my next pair of shoes and I have just spent a minute or so staring at each other.
@ ScribblerG As I like the sound of my voice, I just can’t help myself. I think you like the sound of yours, too. That’s why we get along swimmingly. So from a friend to a friend, here goes: “I just knocked them off their pedestals.” If treating women the way you’re do is about knocking them off the pedestal that means you consider them on a pedestal before you knock them off. You put them there in the first place, at least initially but my guess is they are still there afterwards too. So technically, you yet still have… Read more »
EhIntellect
Animals don’t fear. They react on instinct
Fear is instinctual. Every mammal has that instinct.
Semantic rabbit trails generally are not productive or useful…
Fred Flange, cruising the Beltway in his new auto-mo-bile
Because SHAMING DOES NOT WORK. Never has, never will. Certainly not PUBLIC shaming.
Shaming works on girls. All boys are now commanded to act like girls. Therefore the shaming must continue until all boys act just like girls.
This will work out so well. For the few, the proud, the un-gelded.
But wait, there’s more Fred Flange And no the girls weren’t brave. What would be brave is if they, on their own, confronted one or more of the boys with the list and had a one-on-one out with them. But they didn’t, because they didn’t have that fortitude are all girls. They enlisted the admins and faculty to arrange the waterboarding to be done in public, in front of everyone and the press. Because that’s how the “mean girls” control the rest of the girl herd, and boys must, must, must be Just Like Girls now, so… The FI is… Read more »
“You either need more submissive shoes or ones that can take a stand and enrich your life.”
It’s submissive enough to cower from me if it must, or run if it can, but it’s too stupid to just move 50′ to the east and not be my problem anymore. I suppose it’s enriching my garden, but only on the remains of tearing up my garden, so I’m afraid I lack a sense of gratitude for it.
“Fear is instinctual. Every mammal has that instinct.”
Instinct is more preprogrammed reflex, it isn’t sentient fear and yes we’re getting into the semantic weeds….lol.
@Sentient
From Rollo’s twatter…
https://www.mtlblog.com/news/montreal/montreals-concordia-university-is-warning-students-about-suspicious-strangers-harassing-females-on-campus
Whether this is a more sinister plot to lure women away from campus…
So they can be raped I presume?
or an equally unforgivable system of “pickup artists” scheming to take advantage of Montreal students, Concordia has taken the proper first steps to ensure their student body is at ease.
So betas cold approaching young women is considered morally equivalent to trying to rape them?
CSI
So betas cold approaching young women is considered morally equivalent to trying to rape them?
Yep. Pretty much.
“So betas cold approaching young women is considered morally equivalent to trying to rape them?”
“Yep. Pretty much.”
Nah, these chicks didn’t like the complementary cold open. Me thinks they’re masochists. They don’t like themselves very much and prefer a rhetorical butt smack.
Stick to an immediate neg with pseudo-smart chicks…..
“Your face makeup doesn’t match your neck.”
“You’ve thick ankles for a smart chick.”
“Your bra padding’s uneven. You smuggling a lime and coconut?”
“Your hoops are big enough that circus dogs could jump through them.”
Emilia Clarkes 5’1 or 1.57m tall, she’s like a hobbit. id fuck her but it would be embarrassing to be seen in public with her.
Seriously though we live in democratic societys, vote for whose going to get us laid more or even out the playing field.
EhIntellect
Nah, these chicks didn’t like the complementary cold open… by a Beta. Because being opened by a Beta is rape.
FIFY. No charge.
Your remedial reading is the previous essay by Rollo. Pay attention to the part about “Women ____, ____, ____ Betas”.
Your exercise in situational awareness is to find out what Canadian Uni is referred to and why it is infamous.
@AR
So betas cold approaching young women is considered morally equivalent to trying to rape them?
Yep. Pretty much.
How can women tell that a beta is approaching? And what if the beta is very handsome? Or what if an approaching alpha is ugly?
@AR OK fine. So you’re taking the side of PUA j. All a guy needs is looks and everything else is irrelevant. If a very good looking guy did the exact same thing would these girls have acted differently? We have no idea what they looked like other than some ironically racist-y descriptions. They didn’t discuss the quality of the pickup but for they opened with unoriginal complements. I admit these guys were probably tuning up their pick up artistry skills (for which I commend them) but ATM were not very good at it. But IMO, the beta has nothing… Read more »
Neg: a mild insult disguised as a compliment
EI’s understanding of what a neg is is a little off.
EhIntellect
So you’re taking the side of PUA j.
Really?
All a guy needs is looks and everything else is irrelevant.
Where did I write such a thing?
EhIntellect What you’re assuming is it a girls wanted experience. How do you know what I assume? Rollo writes something and you repeat it. For once quote yourself, why don’t ‘cha and people will take you more seriously, btw. Someone’s triggered… These girls are not searching for Alpha. They’ve no idea what a normal intersexual dynamic is. The Trouble Glasses Girl’s Club is sloshing around in a sea of terror that knife-to-neck rape is one date away. What Canadian Uni is it, again? There’s no way convincing these women otherwise. Fuck ‘em. They aren’t all that anyways. How do you… Read more »
“What “old man outrage” are you referring to? Be specific.”
The subtext of all you write is intersexually contentious. Your m.o. is to manipulate younger men who hang out here to align themselves against women as, you choose, the FI, the hypergamy, or weak emotional women (redundant) who post YouTube vids, all out to get them.
That’s an abuse of your position and disgraceful.
” Get some Ovaltine, go sit on the porch for a while and calm down..”
Oddly enough, I’ve taken to drinking Ovaltine again from time to time. Never thought about drinking it on the porch though.
When the weather breaks.
The more analysis by Rollo the bigger the questions get, pretty soon Rollo you are going to have to go into the spiritually/religious world to make any sense of it. Women want this/women want that/oh it depends what time of the month it is, it depends on context, it depends on whether the man is good looking/bad looking, to infinity and beyond!! This is no doubt true but it is leading us nowhere really as far as I can see other than deeper in the whole of the craziness of a woman’s mind, in my opinion not very productive and… Read more »
“The goal of feminism is to remove all constraints on female sexuality while maximally restricting male sexuality. Roissy (in the future any expression of male sexuality will be illegal. I would amend that: any Beta male expression of sexuality will be deemed offensive or illegal.) Are performances won’t stop even in the face of annihilation It would help to have a solution to how to navigate culture as a male modeling behavior to one another. Did some mentoring at a school today and Jacob a young boy who was around 11 kept lookng at me as an example of being… Read more »
“Adapt what is useful, reject what is useless, and add what is specifically your own.”
From Rational Twatter… https://sites.google.com/site/mrsmnoates/about-me About Me Who I am? I am a high school teacher, a motivational friend, an Xtreme Bootcamp member, an avid reader, and an undisputed social person. As a child, I was raised in Aurora, Colorado where I spent most of my childhood participating in competitive swimming where I turned my talent into my dream and received a college athletic scholarship. I use my thirst for knowledge, my imagination of possibilities, and my search for information as a catalyst for helping others. What is my expertise and beneficial skills? With just over 7 years of education, hands-on,… Read more »
@Eh – What bafflegarb you emit. ‘Taking women off of a pedestal is putting them on another one” or some weak bullshit. I’m not here to play word games. And of course it was me who put them on a pedestal – but the entire femcentric world and Blue Pill social conditioning makes us do this. I don’t have anything else on a pedestal. You seem to think that caring for my daughter and granddaughter means putting them on a pedestal, how sad for you.
Why do you always try and get into it with me?
@scribblerg [ #272495 ……I still have a fundamental disagreement with you boiling all this down to “existential fears”. We have mating strategies – failing at them can cause fear. But the underlying motivation isn’t fear, it’s the desire to fuck and pair up and reproduce. ……seeing this as an “existential fear” is Blue Pill thinking…….I don’t have that kind of fear when it comes to mating strategy. I’m not playing semantic games, but perhaps I’m missing something?..] Come on Scribs you are conflating ‘Existential’ fear versus ‘Instinctual’ fear. There is a difference in wanting to have sex and reproduce versus… Read more »
@scribblerg [‘You have no idea how to distinguish between Alpha/Beta (terms of social dominance in dominance hierarchies),’]
Scribs you keep conflating ‘competency’ hierarchies, alpha animal survival dominance and red pill (Feminine imperative seed need) Alpha intersexual dynamics- again I’ve come to expect more from you
hopefully Sentient does explain the feminine imperative alpha need to you…….
[Anonymous Reader #272526
Fred Flange, cruising the Beltway in his new auto-mo-bile]
reminded me of this
“You seem to think that caring for my daughter and granddaughter means putting them on a pedestal, how sad for you.”
Nah. Your intent there ^^^^ is correct and aligned with your existential imperatives. You’re yet missing this.
Elsewhere you’re less aligned.
That’s all. You do you, my man.
So in terms of breeding it’s all looks all the way for women That’s something I wouldn’t wanna step in…Blue Pill shit…women don’t think like men when it comes to sexual attractiveness… …I was out at Panera today, getting a bagel after a mall walk…an attractive 23 y.o. Puerto Rican bimbo I barely know was offering me a free beverage and hinting that she’d like to be asked out…”I don’t get out much”…”I’m living with my dad”…”I read a lot of books”…”I’ll never forget our casual dances at [her old store she managed but which closed]” (as she turned herself)…… Read more »
Oh, and I do enjoy your hyperbolic energy level. You’ve something apparently to prove, with women, with things, with career, and on and on. It’s a bit try-to-hard.
You’ve moments as a more reasonable guy when we spar. That’s cool.
“Definitely triggered. Get some Ovaltine, go sit on the porch for a while and calm down.
Reminds me, I need to put the fan on the porch again.
Blax: It’s windy
Me: Wednesday? I thought it was Thursday.
SJF: I’m thirsty too. Let’s get a Coke.
Blax: I already did some Coke. Reminds me when I got rufied by Whitney Houston…
Me: Yeah I need to get the roofers out to look at damage because it’s been so windy…
(rinse and repeat)
She may have a case… [left]
Mazingo says two partners at her California firm subjected her to “unwanted sexual attention” while simultaneously excluding her from mentorship opportunities and career growth.
https://biglawbusiness.com/jones-day-accused-by-female-attorneys-of-sex-bias-unequal-pay
Lot’s of late 20’s women like this in the professions… wonder how many bearded dudes got passed over for her to get on the team?
1) All dating apps have internal attractiveness rank for both male and female profiles. Profiles are ranked by number of likes from other users, number of messages received, etc. Again ALL dating apps do this for both male and female. Males get ranked by women. Women get ranked by men. The hot profiles get used by the apps to sell extra features to the lower ranked profiles. That’s how dating apps make money. This issue at the school was that the females didn’t opt-in to any dating app, while many of the pics used to rank them were taken during… Read more »
@Sentient – She may have a case… [left]”
So will these law firms need to start eating each other – you take the case against us – we’ll be sure to sue your firm?
Remember. She’s never yours. Its just your turn.
“Men aren’t allowed to have preferences” Then why cake their faces in cosmetics? The sexual marketplace dictates all non participants must be ready to enter the foray at a moments notice. “They should feel lucky that a woman would date them in the first place.” Make-up gives women a heightened sense of their own SMV. A woman can now present herself as a goddess with the expectations to match. “the Feminine Imperative wants nothing less than complete abandonment from men – and it will use every social and political means available to insure men do.” President Trump. The Gillette advertisement.… Read more »
“Men aren’t allowed to have preferences. They should feel lucky that a woman would date them in the first place. ……..I would amend that: any Beta male expression of sexuality will be deemed offensive or illegal.”
So once upon a time, there was the Seinfield Soup Nazi – No Soup for you
Now we have the FemNazi – NO PUSSY FOR YOU BETA BOY
“NO PUSSY FOR YOU BETA BOY”
“I happen to think that overall, beta men fuck more than anybody else. Somewhere right now, there’s a beta male balls deep in some hb8-9” – Blaximus.
“These red alphas will be a better breed of men than the vanguard of which we are a part.”
That’s the spirit.
J
Betas absolutely are having sex. Lots of sex.
The difference is the conditions around it.
[Blax’s larger point 7 some billion people and growing… Not the result of exclusively Alpha seed.]
Another step closer to universal child support…
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/brazil-identical-twins-child-maintenance-paternity-dna-test-goias-a8852436.html
@Sentient
Right. so the quote should read:
“I would amend that: any gamma/omega male expression of sexuality will be deemed offensive or illegal”.
These are your overweight/under 5’4″, ugly autistic guys who can move up in the hierarchy, to beta male status via status and moneymaxxing, but don’t feel it’s worth it (especially with the promise of sex dolls around the corner), because they’ll never be able to get desire sex from attractive girls that just throw their pussy at Alpha males (Looks/Status/Game), during their cock carousel phase. So they check out:
https://brobible.com/culture/article/millennials-picking-video-games-over-sex/
Sex life and power
and God
J
Vox has done that already and better. Your meme misses the important Delta.
EhIntellect The subtext of all you write is intersexually contentious. Sure you didn’t mean to write “intersectionally”? Either way, you probably shouldn’t comment when you’ve been drinking. Your m.o. is to manipulate younger men who hang out here to align themselves against women as, you choose, the FI, the hypergamy, or weak emotional women (redundant) who post YouTube vids, all out to get them. Lol! You probably shouldn’t comment while using glue, or hallucinogens, or whatever chemistry generated that stack of word salad. That’s an abuse of your position and disgraceful. What position would that be? In a minute, I’ll… Read more »
” The new patriarchy will produce men who are inherently aware of the feminine design and the machinations used to fulfill it. These red alphas will be a better breed of men than the vanguard of which we are a part.” Bullshit, to be aware of this design is not an easy pill to swallow, I see very little of this among men. There are some guys who are cluing in to the bullshit, but they don’t know the why/how. It’s a zero sum game for women when it comes to the mating/reproduction market. You can see it with sperm… Read more »
https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/attraction-evolved/201808/why-do-straight-people-hook-same-gender-partners
Interesting read
@Foxguy. Yep that should be totally clear to everyone by now. Women really just want the protector with the genetics now. Women don’t even care about money if they are 9’s and 10’s. They like working and a job and money comes easy to them. I have noticed alpha cops are very, very attractive to women. If they are tall and alpha, that legal authority that they have over other men and can legally carry a gun gives them this golden status with women. This also gives women a certain status over other women, even other women who are married… Read more »
😁 Well, i.I’m 6 feet tall( barely) and carry a firearm or two when I feel like it, and give zero fucks about alpha cops. You gotta bring ass to kick ass.to Learn to resist intimidation at all costs. Let no man or woman intimidate you, regardless of hb ratings or caliber of gun or job description. Flesh and blood, with a weak spot 99% of the time. Remember, the most dangerous person is the one you never see coming. If they’re standing right in front of you, they aren’t really that much of a threat. What’s gonna happen is… Read more »
@Blaximus. That’s great but a court of law could give zero fucks of how much of a bad ass you think you are. You get just caught with a firearm in some areas that you “carry because you feel like it, but only some of the time” and you will be facing a fine if not arrest. Then if you were to actually use that firearm you will be facing even worse legal reprecussions, criminally or in civil court. An off duty cop can just flash his badge and show the top of his back up piece to any average… Read more »
Alpha cops fear lawyers–especially lawyers who used to work for the Police Dept. It helps to actually know a few cops. You fight cops with lawyers. It helps to know your way around the courts. Funny how girls can sniff out that sort of competence in a man. One place I go, there is no reason to carry a gun. Bouncers will search you if your clothes are loose. And if they aren’t loose, you can’t conceal a weapon from bouncers’ eyes. There has never been a shooting at that bar afaik. I have summoned bouncers before to deal with… Read more »
@theasdgamer. My comment was about how women psychologically view alpha cops as far as their sexual selection is concerned when it comes to seeking protection and genes when society provides them with everything else on a silver platter, and what makes their panties wet. Not if you are able to legally challenge a cop in court for some direct action after the fact. A lawyer who sues somebody and wins in court after they get their ass beat in the street and their wife gets raped is not going to be viewed as a protector and someone women want to… Read more »
If they are tall and alpha, that legal authority that they have over other men and can legally carry a gun gives them this golden status with women.
Most states allow concealed carry.
“Most states allow conceal carry”. That’s the thing that most people don’t get. Being allowed to conceal carry and having the authority to use the weapon are two different things. As I said, an off duty cop can flash a badge and doesn’t even need to display a gun in order to assume authority in society. Try displaying your conceal carry in order to de-escalate a situation and see what happens. The ability to carry a gun doesn’t give you the authority to use it or the ability to influence people with the authority that a gun AND a badge… Read more »
And again I’m only relating that to women and their psychology when it comes to their sexual selection. It’s not any cop, it’s the alpha cops with the genes and the bad boy tats combined with the authority and power over other men their job gives them that makes them especially attractive to a large number of women. Just my observations and from what I have heard from more than one woman express verbally. This makes sense in society where law and order is breaking down. Women will seek protection in the last place they DON’T get it (the streets)… Read more »
I guess it’s about individual choice in the final analysis. Internalized mindset. I don’t really need to ” theorize ” about the whole ” cops and legal system ” thing as I’ve had to strategize around it for most of my early life. Depends on where a man sets his threshold. So I want to go to prison? Fuck no. Will that fact mean that I will read and he intimidated by police and the legal system? Fuck no yet again. Basically, I’m a law abiding citizen. Some off duty cop flashing his gun is no different than a blood… Read more »
Short story.
About 15 years ago we had a couple of those ” cop shoots unarmed man ” scenarios. Eventually it became open season on cops, and there were about5-6 shootings of cops. The police weren’t allowed to work without a partner.
There was a palpable look of fear in a lot of their faces. Different when people are shooting at you for no reason, huh?
The police dept self corrected. They never ” caught” any of the shooters. Message recieved..
Women panties dry in presence of ” tatted Badass ” cops.
End scene.
Have I popped into a chan?
Blaximus. I’m just giving you what I have heard straight from women’s mouths. They definitely do get wet in the presence of tatted bad boy cops the exact same as they get wet for bad boy thugs. There is no difference in a woman’s mind ultimately except for which bad boy they meet first and/or who they believe will ultimately hold the power socially. Your anecdote is irrelevant. As far as the “Chan” comment… everything is interconnected. It’s not all based on this vague “female imperative” driving everything behind relations between the sexes. That is just stupid. It’s the “male… Read more »
Final thought.
Mind listening to what ” women ” say.
They put an awful lot of demonstrable bullshit out in the ether.
Poptarts
what’s your experience level with women,? How old are you? Share some background…
Sorry. But not just what they say but how they act around them. And who they date/fuck and marry. You can trust when a woman says she likes a dominant man SHE ACTUALLY MEANS IT. lol
Poptart
You can trust when a woman says she likes a dominant man SHE ACTUALLY MEANS IT. lol
Well i restate my questions…
What’s your experience level with women,? How old are you? Have you had penetrative intercourse with a female human? without paying for it?