Comments on: Women Behaving Badly

By: jock itch

jock itch — Thu, 09 Apr 2015 08:16:55 +0000

new tribe? lol. like a tree house with a sign ‘no girls allowed’?? u will die a virgin bro

By: Dumb Pollock

Dumb Pollock — Wed, 08 Apr 2015 13:08:42 +0000

The first step in reasserting male control over hypergamy is to not trying to change the women or the society. The first step is to create a separate community, a tribe of like-minded people, in a area isolated from the liberal-dominated culture. There, you can create a new culture that affirm the traditional understanding of sexual relationships.

By: Wives & Lovers |

Wives & Lovers | — Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:45:20 +0000

[…] In Women Behaving Badly I made mention of Dalrock’s standing assertions that the context of romantic love has superseded the condition of a committed monogamy – traditionally marriage – as an idealized goal-state. Essentially this represents a reversal of a previous intersexual dynamic that served as a check and balance of women’s innate Hypergamy: […]

By: Jason Dusek (@solidsnack)

Jason Dusek (@solidsnack) — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 07:26:18 +0000

What is your reasoning, exactly? Because passive dread does not really sound like attachment, at least not on the face of it.

By: Rollo Tomassi

Rollo Tomassi — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:49:25 +0000

I think it’s entirely compatible, when you consider that women tend to form stronger attachments to men 1-2 SMV degrees above themselves. It’s a form of passive dread that bonds women to high value men.

By: Jason Dusek (@solidsnack)

Jason Dusek (@solidsnack) — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:44:14 +0000

To say that women love in a way fundamentally different from men seems reasonable from an evolutionary perspective, but isn’t compatible with attachment theory — and attachment seems to be a pretty solid basis for understanding intimacy in all kinds of human relationships.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attachment_theory

But maybe intimacy isn’t what you’re talking about when you’re talking about love?

By: Idealism |

Idealism | — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 21:29:04 +0000

[…] There was a time when men’s idealistic concept of love was respected above the opportunistic (Hypergamy based) concept of love. I explored this social control of Hypergamy in Women Behaving Badly. […]

By: Matthew Chiglinsky

Matthew Chiglinsky — Mon, 16 Mar 2015 16:51:46 +0000

You explain basic human psychology in such a complicated way. How about this as a simpler solution: People should stop behaving like unruly animals and learn some self-respect.

Men could prevent hypergamy by simply changing their own behavior. All they need to do is (a) refuse to have sex with a woman until marriage, (b) record every marriage in an official registry, and (c) avoid any woman who is already married. Men are complicit in hypergamy. Men betray each other. It’s not completely the woman’s fault if the man knows she is cheating on another man and still knowingly has sex with her anyway.