Comments on: We’ll Do It Live! (again…well, sorta)

By: jf12

jf12 — Mon, 06 Oct 2014 20:36:06 +0000

re: explaining psychosexosocial choices and behaviors. It was Freud who first emphasized the explanatory power of the death-drive concept. Hedonism explains surprisingly little of human behavor. Very seriously, “If it feels good, do it” has never been true in any explanatory sense: it’s simply not true that if it feels good that someone is doing it, nor that if someone is doingit that it feels goodnecessarily. At all. And neither utilitarianism for the individual nor ANY kind of “greatest good” species-wide benefit has ever been shown to arise evolutionarily. If anything, experiments and experience tell us that natural selection results from the maximizing of the greatest evils happening to the greatest number (of “others”).

But whether or not you consider it strictly pathological per se for Thanatos to be combined with, and not separated from, Eros, plenty of the relevant facts previously discussed do NOT fit well if at all into the airyfairy dismissive “Well, her body knows what it’s doing for the best” paradigm. These facts include the war bride phenomenon, women’s unshakable attractions to bad boys including serial killers, and the certifiable behavior of women being much more likely to have unprotected sex with a man they believe to have been recently promiscuous. For starters.

By: jf12

jf12 — Mon, 06 Oct 2014 13:49:13 +0000

The white knighting should be the second big clue: “If women choose these men, they must have good reasons. All we have to do is use our imagin-ations.”

By: dcllcd

dcllcd — Mon, 06 Oct 2014 06:59:33 +0000

Thanks for sharing the Psychology Today article. It helped me with my unplugging and my coming to terms with the true female nature.

By: Rollo Tomassi

Rollo Tomassi — Sun, 05 Oct 2014 16:42:19 +0000

Heheh,..

By: LiveFearless

LiveFearless — Sun, 05 Oct 2014 16:38:25 +0000

Since the announcement, SOUNDCLOUD has been working around the clock, expanding its servers to handle the listener traffic.

By: chris

chris — Sun, 05 Oct 2014 09:53:23 +0000

@ jf12

Women orgasm harder with supplicating betas.
(Never heard of this, can you please cite?)

Women orgasm more frequently (per sexual episode) with long-term men, including those men with whom the women no longer bother initiating sex.
(Never heard of this, can you please cite?)

Also, women orgasm more easily with a provider (a man they believe to be rich), believe it or not.
(I hve heard of the study where women orgasmed more with wealthy men)

Women are much much less likely to orgasm with a man they believe to be unfaithful,
(Never heard of this, can you please cite?)

women are much less likely to orgasm with a dark triad man,
(Never heard of this, can you please cite?)

and women are less likely to orgasm with a short term or one-night stand or man from whom they do not expect other benefits.
(Never heard of this, can you please cite?)

Women do not choose *sexual* partners per se on the basis of the women’s orgasms. Period.
(Never heard of this, can you please cite?)

The ultimate indirect benefit is zero (or negative) actual benefit. Period.
(Can you please explain this better?)

I’m not trying to be rude, or obnoxious, it’s just that if you have evidence that could fundamentally rock my world-view, I’d love to know about it. I’m not the kind of person who likes to live in the dark.

By: Tom

Tom — Sat, 04 Oct 2014 21:23:36 +0000

. . . this guy jf12 . . . what a keyboard jockey!

By: Leviathan

Leviathan — Sat, 04 Oct 2014 20:26:48 +0000

“I read it long ago. What I said is much more correct. Yes, I could win the citation war easily if I felt like it.”

No you couldn’t because you are just making shit up. Since you “have returned to the fold, fwiw, if I ever left”, go back to the “Othosphere” and stop bothering the adults who are trying to talk rationally here.