Comments on: The Proposal

By: TuffLuv

TuffLuv — Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:17:32 +0000

Oops, supposed to be an embedded image of the Waterhouse painting above.. guess I haven’t figure this out yet..

By: TuffLuv

TuffLuv — Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:12:53 +0000

[… the ugly reality of hypergamy and women’s underlying motives in optimizing it, but also the (in some cases life-long) idealism, to the point of pathology, Betas will endure ONEitis and to the point of death, fail to ever grasp the truth of that idealism… ]

I’ve nicknamed my former wife, “My Siren”. Thought she was a Unicorn, lol.

It’s a great metaphor for the above..

btw, the sailor is drowning.

By: bankruptmorals

bankruptmorals — Wed, 09 Jul 2014 01:52:57 +0000

House of Cards does portray a rather interesting implementation of Machiavellian politics in action and with it some red-pill truths, but an even better show (now cancelled unfortunately) was “Boss” with Kelsey Grammer.

If you want to see real Machiavellian game in action, forget house of cards, check out Boss (also on netflix).

By: George Meeks

George Meeks — Tue, 08 Jul 2014 23:31:21 +0000

@heyjay

Speaking for yourself and Gregg?

By: jacklabear

jacklabear — Tue, 08 Jul 2014 17:03:44 +0000

“Neither is men’s sexual impulse going away for the same reason.”

A humorist might say that wisdom is what you get when your energy and drive wane.

“The difference is a feminine-centric social order pathologizes men’s sexual nature while expecting no limitation on women’s hypergamy…”

I noticed another way that is manifesting socially/legally:
Canada is another country that is working on legislation that makes prostitution legal for women, but criminalizes the prostitutes’ clients.

That is a completely illogical and egregious example of removing limitations on women’s sexuality while maximally restricting men’s sexuality. It makes no sense in any other light.

By: jf12

jf12 — Tue, 08 Jul 2014 16:48:17 +0000

re: Pavlovitz. The actual Biblical answer to a man’s sexual answer, the actual remedy for concupiscence, is to get married so he WILL have a woman who belongs to him.

By: Badpainter

Badpainter — Tue, 08 Jul 2014 16:38:21 +0000

@Rollo

Yes, hypergamy isn’t going away. Which only makes relationships with women similar to Siegfried’s and Roy’s relationship with their tigers. They misplaced their trust in their own hubris rather than in the nature of the beast.

By: Rollo Tomassi

Rollo Tomassi — Tue, 08 Jul 2014 15:58:00 +0000

Hypergamy’s not going away, it’s part of women’s evolved neurological firmware.

Neither is men’s sexual impulse going away for the same reason.

The difference is a feminine-centric social order pathologizes men’s sexual nature while expecting no limitation on women’s hypergamy; and even men themselves are the loudest advocates for it.

http://johnpavlovitz.com/2014/06/20/young-men-sex-and-urge-ownership-and-why-its-not-the-girls-problem/