Comments on: Intersexual Hierarchies –Part II

By: Idealism |

Idealism | — Fri, 20 Mar 2015 21:28:59 +0000

[…] From Intersexual Hierarchies: […]

By: Bachelor Nation |

Bachelor Nation | — Fri, 13 Mar 2015 19:38:50 +0000

[…] dichotomy presents to men and women is that it fundamentally places both sexes into the Subdominant model of intersexual hierarchies. In that model the man is perceived as another dependent […]

By: Zeke

Zeke — Thu, 23 Oct 2014 04:33:54 +0000

“…as long as you remain the dominant force in her non-work life”

I’ve recently read a study entitled
Egalitarianism, Housework, and Sexual Frequency in Marriage that supports the fact the claim that marriages with more traditional roles report a greater frequency if sex and an overall greater satisfaction in the marriage. I love how that study relates to everything in this post; that Game does work, that the phrase “If you want more sex, MOW THE LAWN” really is statically true.

The biggest relation between this post/study was Tomassi’s relay from Heartiste that dissatisfaction was more frequent in a marriage when she was the primary decision maker. This study proposes/proves that sex is a resource controlled by women (Hypergamy) and in a successful marriage each party needs resources that is scarce to the other. So, if a women makes more money, that is just one resource to be negotiated upon and a successful marriage can still be obtained. But, as Heartiste and this study point out, if a women controls all of the resources (aka. Decision making) then there is nothing that she needs to negotiate for from her Beta significant other.

By: The Love Series | Rivelino's Diary

The Love Series | Rivelino's Diary — Tue, 07 Oct 2014 00:50:23 +0000

[…] Intersexual Hierarchies Part 2 May 13, 2014 link […]

By: The Best of Rational Male – Year Three |

The Best of Rational Male – Year Three | — Wed, 10 Sep 2014 04:18:05 +0000

[…] Intersexual Hierarchies – Part II […]

By: Required Reading Units 2.1-2.5: The Rational Male Series | R.P.U.

Required Reading Units 2.1-2.5: The Rational Male Series | R.P.U. — Tue, 08 Jul 2014 06:21:32 +0000

[…] Intersexual Hierarchies Part 1 – Part 2 […]

By: orion

orion — Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:59:29 +0000

I dont care.

If a girl does not want her pussy eaten or to suck my dick, well, it was not meant to be, neh ?

By: Bluepillprofessor

Bluepillprofessor — Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:33:01 +0000

“”If you encountered a woman who fit every ideal you ever had for a relationship – best friend, loving, 100% loyal, excellent mother, came from a great family, perfect HB 10, healthy both mentally and physically, emotionally available, intellectually stimulating, shared all your beliefs – who loved you unconditionally and wanted to marry you, but with one caveat; he/she would NEVER have sex with you under any circumstances, would you marry this person? You could have children together through insemination and they would always be platonically affectionate with you; knowing full well before you did, and pledging to be completely faithful yourself, would you spend the rest of your life in a completely sexless marriage with an otherwise ideal person?””

“”Consider the opposite extreme; would you bang an HB9.5 whom you knew would guarantee you a sexual experience you would savor to the grave, but only once and with absolutely no consequences for enjoying her?””

Actually…the opposite extreme to the initial question would be a woman who was ugly, overweight, unnatractive, a terrible mother from a terrible family, unhealthy, emotionally unavailable, not intellectually stimulating, not affectionate, and didn’t really like you BUT is a raging nymphomaniac who only wants to fuck you and she wants it all the time in every way possible. Nothing is off limits. There is nothing she won’t do for you in bed.

Would you spend the rest of your life getting laid all the time with an otherwise terrible person? Welcome to the “good” marriages circa 2.0.