They know how effective it can be.

Anyway there’s lots written about dating phases and “early” marriage. Very little about the 20 year point. I don’t know what lies beyond. My parents have gotten past 50, and while they truly married for life, they didn’t seem all that excited about it when we threw a 50th anniversary dinner for them. More worn out, partially due to health issues.

I recently bulked upper body muscle, just a bit in the right places. (Yoga is actually good for this. That, combined with some targeted “dynamic tension” exercises, is all I did.) Rather than complimenting me or appearing attracted, that made her more angry than she usually is.

She says literally she wants to be in charge. She said it within the past hour, tonight. Alpha type behavior makes her, as best I can describe it, resentful. You hit this nail right on the head. (She even tries dread game against me, too.)

All men. Only men. Popular content says it’s so… http://wp.me/P3P5mL-uz

The ulimate sh1t test is for her to demand a man be more beta (and bring in those beta bucks) while assuming a role of authority. But then she sabotages HER OWN RELATIONSHIP by creating a super-beta man who she can’t be sexually attracted to. The idiot man’s only crime is that he’s an idiot by giving a women what she says she wants and expecting it to work. I’ve read all kinds of formulas for “successful game” but the articles telling men how to conduct themselves in long-term pair-bond relationships are not as common. Sites like MMSL try to explain how this process could work. Most ones that are out there are written by women, and/or are full of blue-pill bullsh1t which read like a Hallmark card or something on the cutting room floor of that terrible movie “What Women Want”. (Newflash – they still don’t know…)

My own theory is that to survive a long term relationship, the man must NEVER kowtow to demands to be beta, NEVER submit to a wife trying to wear the pants, NEVER be “too good”, and always be in one form of trouble or another. The man *must* create friction, tension and create tangible proof of his superior position in the relationship power dynamic: he must f*** things up on a regular basis, mostly minor things but the odd big one, to keep her hamster wheel spinning madly on three main things. a) What’s wrong with me? and b) why do I love this @$$Hole so much and c) Why won’t he change? Honestly, the biggest blue-pill lie of all is that men should be emotionally nurturing to their female partners and be “good boys” all the time. This is because women project THEIR roles onto those of men, because they have no other reference point. (I’ve often told women that their “ideal man” is acutally a woman or a gay man, resulting in the ‘get cats’ speach they all love so much.) So, my theory is that you need just the right amount of INTRIGUE for the woman in a long term relationship. That’s a nice politically correct blue-pill word for keeping her doubting own self-worth on a continual and ongoing basis while forever trying to change three or more “bad boy” behaviors and knowing if she tried to assume the lead role in the relationship would result in events that might actually make her afraid… That my dear men, is what will keep her interested and moist.

Being a good provider and a good boy? You may as well ASK her outright to go bang some bad-boy stud and rip you to shreds in divorce court. She’ll do it and eat her prey and chalk it up, subconsciously, to how things work in nature. Weak things deserve death, and nothing deserves death more than a weak male.