fish have the best strategy… they spawn thousands off offspring and leave the rest to chance, but fish are very simple animals with zero skill set to pass on…..

in more complex animals at least one parent is needed to pass on life skills……..polar bears for example are raised only by the female, but males are anything but betas….

in humans the man can pump a thousand women a year if he is skilled, he can mate like a fish, leaving spawn all over the place…. the only problem is he has no guarantee that any will survive… and none learn any of his life skills or benefit from his provisioning…

the female on the other hand must care for the young and raise them… she is invested in and has more guarantee of their survival, she also gets to pass on more traits…. but in the human realm needs the males assistance…. we are more like birds that have to nest together and work together…. than polar bears where one parent is enough….

allowing the females to take over the mating entirely moves us further towards insects, which are highly communal creatures with equality being the norm… there are no special ants….

but mammals are not hive minded… they are herd or pack minded – or just solitary…. so all efforts to create a hive type existence leads to thuggery and pack type behavior….and a few loners heading their own way….

plus very few human females (no matter how hard feminism tries) are capable of the logical male attitudes and approaches to create new technology, solve problems, fight aggressors etc.

fine if a woman can and genuinely wants to embrace the male world to some degree with the caveat that males cannot become females and give birth…. AND that a woman that wants to join the male world, should not have the opt out to take 10 years off to be a mother, AND must have the same standards and skill sets as equivalent males in her chosen field…

http://hereticalsex.blogspot.com/2007/08/why-did-feminists-attack-family.html

First I wish you a Happy New Year with many blessings and the protection of God.

Second I have a new year request for you: could you write something about what feminism has turned marriage into, for men? I mean, I think it penalized men who get into marriage in a number of indirect ways, by rendering it into a very risky and costly endeavor where the man assumes all the costs and risks, while having less value and earning less respect and love than a poodle madam dog. On the other hand, there is a great number of self-entitled, neurotic women which demand the “superman” as a husband, while claiming total independence, freedom, having little or no housework and child bearing and bringing skills.

I was thinking these days: if we could create a Pussy Price Index, which would be the value of this index in countries where feminism has reached supremacy? Could it be related to the dismal total birth rates in these countries. Of course, there are other factors such as technological development, female education, accessibility to birth control methods, women priorizing career (and animals) to family and children, etc. But overall, something went very wrong as these societies are not able to keep birth rates at replacement levels. Or could it be just the natural and historical up and down cycles of most civilizations such as Ancient Egypt, Roman Empire, etc.? How do you see all of this?

All the best.

Hopefully Russians will soon realize that feminism is an even greater evil than gay movement and ban it altogether as well.

Happy New Year!

“…Dear Rollo,Why the obsession with liberating (unplugging) Betas from the Matrix?

This is why:
http://therationalmale.com/2011/10/26/whats-your-problem/