Comments on: Sex, Lies and Statistics.

By: PZ wrestles with SMV, loses | Vox Popoli

PZ wrestles with SMV, loses | Vox Popoli — Thu, 04 Dec 2014 01:12:00 +0000

[…] There are few things more amusing than watching a Gamma attempt to criticize some aspect of Game. In this case, PZ provides a fascinating critique of Rollo’s SMV graphic: […]

By: Savaged by statistical sheep | Blog

Savaged by statistical sheep | Blog — Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:19:13 +0000

[…] Below is the target of her criticism, Rollo’s sexual market value over lifetime chart. […]

By: Validation Hunting & The Jenny Bahn Epiphany |

Validation Hunting & The Jenny Bahn Epiphany | — Mon, 13 Oct 2014 04:10:53 +0000

[…] I’ve gone into explaining the loose metrics I’ve based this graph on several occasions, I’ve added some arrows here to illustrate a point that often gets missed or simply blown […]

By: Norwegian

Norwegian — Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:26:20 +0000

“The 22 year old SMV peaked hottie should be attracted to and interested in settling down with the 37 year old, in-shape, potential maximized, Game-aware man.”

Why?

By: The Best of Rational Male – Year Three |

The Best of Rational Male – Year Three | — Wed, 10 Sep 2014 04:18:09 +0000

[…] Sex, Lies and Statistics […]

By: George Clooney Engaged – Red Pill Invalidated! | Just Four Guys

George Clooney Engaged – Red Pill Invalidated! | Just Four Guys — Tue, 06 May 2014 02:14:38 +0000

[…] There is a rule I heard somewhere which basically says take the man’s age, divide by 2, and add 7, and that gives you an idea of the floor that a man could still potentially attract. If we used George’s age of 52, we would get 33 so Amal is pretty close to that age. In his case though because of his celebrity status, the rule doesn’t even apply to him. I have no doubt he could attract and bang plenty of 22-25 year olds. But for the non-celebrity man who maximizes his potential SMV (successful, stays in shape, etc.) dating women 10-15 years younger is very possible. And the reason for that is because of the different rates in decline of SMV over time. […]

By: wizdude21 (@wizdude21)

wizdude21 (@wizdude21) — Sat, 19 Apr 2014 05:14:17 +0000

one of the most ridiculous things I hear is when guys label a lot of the imbeciles who women fuck as “alphas” most of them are far from alphas…dudes need to reexamine what they call “alpha”

By: Denise

Denise — Wed, 18 Dec 2013 21:16:38 +0000

I understand your point about men not necessarily going for the 23 year old. But what I’m trying to get at is what makes the 38 year old “peak” at that particular age. Yes, the 30 year old woman would prefer the 35 year old man over the 25 year old. But the 25 year old woman would probably not. The 27 year old woman…eh, it’s a crapshoot and would depend on personalities and individual priorities.

I’m guessing that the 23 year old woman is at her peak with respect to her competitiveness against other women in attracting the most men. If the same principle is applied to men, he will probably be most attractive to the greatest number of women in his early thirties.

Perhaps this has been written already, perhaps not; but the factors that receive the most weight in making a man attractive change according to the age demographic of women you speak to. So a man’s highest level attractiveness will necessarily be only in relation to a certain age spectrum of women. I might even argue that women rarely look at men in purely physical terms IRL (celebrities don’t count because they might as well be fictional), so I’m not sure that a woman’s SMV and a man’s SMV can really be talked about in the same terms. A man is, more often than not, going to be automatically perceived as a combination of SMV-MMV. Yes, women will play the hookup game, the FWB game or whatever; but more often than not it’s a strategy to get a man’s further commitment.