<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glitches in the Matrix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therationalmale.com/2012/11/16/glitches-in-the-matrix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/11/16/glitches-in-the-matrix/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 22:58:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/11/16/glitches-in-the-matrix/comment-page-2/#comment-12642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=2044#comment-12642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Related: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2238435/Swedish-toy-firm-Top-Toy-forced-gender-neutral-Christmas-catalogue.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Related: <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2238435/Swedish-toy-firm-Top-Toy-forced-gender-neutral-Christmas-catalogue.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2238435/Swedish-toy-firm-Top-Toy-forced-gender-neutral-Christmas-catalogue.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manly commercial. From Toyota!?</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/11/16/glitches-in-the-matrix/comment-page-2/#comment-12553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manly commercial. From Toyota!?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 03:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=2044#comment-12553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;]  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gregariouswolf</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/11/16/glitches-in-the-matrix/comment-page-2/#comment-12255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gregariouswolf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=2044#comment-12255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Woman: Take it back.
Man: No.

Win!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woman: Take it back.<br />
Man: No.</p>
<p>Win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themaraudingmongol</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/11/16/glitches-in-the-matrix/comment-page-2/#comment-12227</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themaraudingmongol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 04:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=2044#comment-12227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brilliant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blah123</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/11/16/glitches-in-the-matrix/comment-page-2/#comment-12219</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blah123]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 01:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=2044#comment-12219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reproduction isn&#039;t everything&#039;s &quot;goal&quot; and it&#039;s not the motivation for everything you do. It heavily influences what general behaviors are, but that doesn&#039;t mean anything. Why do I like sex with women in their twenties with hourglass figures? At the end of the day, because I&#039;m more likely to reproduce if I do. So what? I don&#039;t have an urge to reproduce, I have an urge to do things that happen to increase my odds of reproduction.

Your philosophy is self-evidently crazy. Why isn&#039;t rape good, if your only purpose is to reproduce? Why don&#039;t you abandon your family and spend all your time going from country to country donating sperm? That increases your odds of reproduction a lot more than having a family. Why don&#039;t you divorce and start a second family, and then a third? More reproduction! Why not pay poor Indian women to have baby after baby after baby? More copies! There&#039;s no ultimate point to it, so why not just enjoy yourself?

And re: rape not being universal because someone studied some culture they don&#039;t remember in college where they didn&#039;t have a word for it, I studied that too. It was Samoa, as described by Margaret Mead in a book that is now recognized to have been totally inaccurate, in part because she didn&#039;t recognize that the Samoans she was talking to were fucking with her as a joke.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reproduction isn&#8217;t everything&#8217;s &#8220;goal&#8221; and it&#8217;s not the motivation for everything you do. It heavily influences what general behaviors are, but that doesn&#8217;t mean anything. Why do I like sex with women in their twenties with hourglass figures? At the end of the day, because I&#8217;m more likely to reproduce if I do. So what? I don&#8217;t have an urge to reproduce, I have an urge to do things that happen to increase my odds of reproduction.</p>
<p>Your philosophy is self-evidently crazy. Why isn&#8217;t rape good, if your only purpose is to reproduce? Why don&#8217;t you abandon your family and spend all your time going from country to country donating sperm? That increases your odds of reproduction a lot more than having a family. Why don&#8217;t you divorce and start a second family, and then a third? More reproduction! Why not pay poor Indian women to have baby after baby after baby? More copies! There&#8217;s no ultimate point to it, so why not just enjoy yourself?</p>
<p>And re: rape not being universal because someone studied some culture they don&#8217;t remember in college where they didn&#8217;t have a word for it, I studied that too. It was Samoa, as described by Margaret Mead in a book that is now recognized to have been totally inaccurate, in part because she didn&#8217;t recognize that the Samoans she was talking to were fucking with her as a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma the Emo</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/11/16/glitches-in-the-matrix/comment-page-2/#comment-12201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emma the Emo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=2044#comment-12201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adam,

I think it&#039;s wrong to say someone is motivated to do everything for reproduction. They are not consciously or even subconsciously motivated (not necessarily), it&#039;s just that they evolved to do things that lead to reproduction. Things like enjoyment of sex, gathering as many resources as possible, trying to look good, etc. 

When you speak of goals, you can&#039;t talk about natural processes, which aren&#039;t persons with consciousness, and can&#039;t have goals. Persons can have goals however. And those persons&#039; goals can sometimes go along behavior that leads to reproduction, and sometimes their goals go against that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s wrong to say someone is motivated to do everything for reproduction. They are not consciously or even subconsciously motivated (not necessarily), it&#8217;s just that they evolved to do things that lead to reproduction. Things like enjoyment of sex, gathering as many resources as possible, trying to look good, etc. </p>
<p>When you speak of goals, you can&#8217;t talk about natural processes, which aren&#8217;t persons with consciousness, and can&#8217;t have goals. Persons can have goals however. And those persons&#8217; goals can sometimes go along behavior that leads to reproduction, and sometimes their goals go against that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hopeless Romantic</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/11/16/glitches-in-the-matrix/comment-page-2/#comment-12192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hopeless Romantic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=2044#comment-12192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Yes, this serves the feminine imperative, but within the bounds of traditional marriage, that is fine. Marriage is meant to serve both the masculine and feminine imperatives.&quot;

Marriage is meant to serve the offspring&#039;s imperative and the imperatives of both parents become secondary at that point.  The problem is that marriage to you people has no other purpose than self gratification of either spouse.  You don&#039;t know what &quot;for the sake of the kids&quot; means.  Its a foreign concept to you.  In this way you are more childish than your own children.

&quot;“While post-traumatic stress disorder was not a factor in large numbers of suicides, data show, among nearly 85% there were failed relationships, something linked to frequent separations.”

“Still, at at least a third of soldiers who killed themselves this year never went to war, and some leaders draw a correlation with societal stress, perhaps related to the poor economy.”

Or more perhaps related to women.&quot;

Its foolish for a spouse, whether wife or husband, to assume that their other half is going to be faithful if they are out of town much of the time.   Are many spouses in such situations faithful?  Sure.  But why assume that&#039;s the way it is or *should* be.

Proceed with caution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yes, this serves the feminine imperative, but within the bounds of traditional marriage, that is fine. Marriage is meant to serve both the masculine and feminine imperatives.&#8221;</p>
<p>Marriage is meant to serve the offspring&#8217;s imperative and the imperatives of both parents become secondary at that point.  The problem is that marriage to you people has no other purpose than self gratification of either spouse.  You don&#8217;t know what &#8220;for the sake of the kids&#8221; means.  Its a foreign concept to you.  In this way you are more childish than your own children.</p>
<p>&#8220;“While post-traumatic stress disorder was not a factor in large numbers of suicides, data show, among nearly 85% there were failed relationships, something linked to frequent separations.”</p>
<p>“Still, at at least a third of soldiers who killed themselves this year never went to war, and some leaders draw a correlation with societal stress, perhaps related to the poor economy.”</p>
<p>Or more perhaps related to women.&#8221;</p>
<p>Its foolish for a spouse, whether wife or husband, to assume that their other half is going to be faithful if they are out of town much of the time.   Are many spouses in such situations faithful?  Sure.  But why assume that&#8217;s the way it is or *should* be.</p>
<p>Proceed with caution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/11/16/glitches-in-the-matrix/comment-page-2/#comment-12178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=2044#comment-12178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Blah123

False. Reproduction is the end goal of every living organism and everything that men and women do is motivated by the urge to reproduce. That means rapists are also motivated by it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Blah123</p>
<p>False. Reproduction is the end goal of every living organism and everything that men and women do is motivated by the urge to reproduce. That means rapists are also motivated by it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
