<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sex in the 90&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therationalmale.com/2012/09/21/sex-in-the-90s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/09/21/sex-in-the-90s/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 21:14:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: (Don&#8217;t) Be Like Mike &#171;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/09/21/sex-in-the-90s/comment-page-1/#comment-10803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[(Don&#8217;t) Be Like Mike &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 19:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1861#comment-10803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] attempts to reveal the rudiments of Game in the mid 90&#8242;s, and considering this decade was the apex period for the feminine Matrix it&#8217;s all the more [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] attempts to reveal the rudiments of Game in the mid 90&#8242;s, and considering this decade was the apex period for the feminine Matrix it&#8217;s all the more [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Required</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/09/21/sex-in-the-90s/comment-page-1/#comment-10254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Required]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1861#comment-10254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[number closes in the 70s 80s 90s, lmao....I guess if you liked pizza, the number a flaky girl would give out could have been considered a score!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>number closes in the 70s 80s 90s, lmao&#8230;.I guess if you liked pizza, the number a flaky girl would give out could have been considered a score!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/09/21/sex-in-the-90s/comment-page-1/#comment-10249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lou]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1861#comment-10249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been two changes that have made it harder to pick up women better than 7&#039;s: 1. Cell phones 2. Bottle service

1. I started dating in &#039;99 and only a few people had cell phones back then. That made everyone who was out at a bar/club be in the moment. The hot girls where not texting each other, or the guys that they would hook up with later that night. That means if they were out they were more open to meeting new people and you could get a number if you could spend as little as five minutes talking to a girl. There were nights when I would get six numbers (three of which were fake) and ended up going out with two girls. Multiply that by the three nights a week and you could do some serious damage. This led to spending a lot of money going out and taking out girls. Eventually (~ 2 years) I learned to spend less, but not before amassing 40K+ in credit card debt. It was totally worth it.

2. In the old days all people partied together, no matter how high-end the club was. True, there were places with VIP areas, but these were mostly in Hollywood and NYC. So once you figured out a way to get into the top notch places, you were roaming as an equal amongst some of the hottest women. Even if you had little to no game, there were still few guys approaching so if you approached every single hot girl at a place chances were good that you could get a few numbers from hot women. The funny thing was that girls would give out their number and answer “and who is this again” since they likely gave it to multiple people. 

Now with bottle service and other segmentation of clubs, most of the hot girls are given wrist bands to go into special areas that the common man has trouble accessing. Even when the girls come to the common area, they have most of their friends in the wristband area and so it’s more difficult to get something positive out of it.

Flaking--- it used to happen just as it does today, but I experienced less of it. Mostly because chicks went out with dudes out of curiosity if nothing else. Now, a girl is likely to remember you or not answer the phone at all so she has a pretty good idea about you from the get go. I remember at least five girls who went out with me and I ended banging and were difficult to reach on the phone (for various reasons, not home when I called, them calling me when I wasn’t home, roommates/family not passing on messages, etc.). But once I got them on the phone their curiosity took over. Now, if a girl doesn’t answer the phone or text, it means you’re out.

So when did this golden era end? Some would say 03, others earlier, but nonetheless 99-02, where my golden years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been two changes that have made it harder to pick up women better than 7&#8217;s: 1. Cell phones 2. Bottle service</p>
<p>1. I started dating in &#8217;99 and only a few people had cell phones back then. That made everyone who was out at a bar/club be in the moment. The hot girls where not texting each other, or the guys that they would hook up with later that night. That means if they were out they were more open to meeting new people and you could get a number if you could spend as little as five minutes talking to a girl. There were nights when I would get six numbers (three of which were fake) and ended up going out with two girls. Multiply that by the three nights a week and you could do some serious damage. This led to spending a lot of money going out and taking out girls. Eventually (~ 2 years) I learned to spend less, but not before amassing 40K+ in credit card debt. It was totally worth it.</p>
<p>2. In the old days all people partied together, no matter how high-end the club was. True, there were places with VIP areas, but these were mostly in Hollywood and NYC. So once you figured out a way to get into the top notch places, you were roaming as an equal amongst some of the hottest women. Even if you had little to no game, there were still few guys approaching so if you approached every single hot girl at a place chances were good that you could get a few numbers from hot women. The funny thing was that girls would give out their number and answer “and who is this again” since they likely gave it to multiple people. </p>
<p>Now with bottle service and other segmentation of clubs, most of the hot girls are given wrist bands to go into special areas that the common man has trouble accessing. Even when the girls come to the common area, they have most of their friends in the wristband area and so it’s more difficult to get something positive out of it.</p>
<p>Flaking&#8212; it used to happen just as it does today, but I experienced less of it. Mostly because chicks went out with dudes out of curiosity if nothing else. Now, a girl is likely to remember you or not answer the phone at all so she has a pretty good idea about you from the get go. I remember at least five girls who went out with me and I ended banging and were difficult to reach on the phone (for various reasons, not home when I called, them calling me when I wasn’t home, roommates/family not passing on messages, etc.). But once I got them on the phone their curiosity took over. Now, if a girl doesn’t answer the phone or text, it means you’re out.</p>
<p>So when did this golden era end? Some would say 03, others earlier, but nonetheless 99-02, where my golden years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/09/21/sex-in-the-90s/comment-page-1/#comment-10232</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[b]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1861#comment-10232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oddly, Kurt Cobain doesn&#039;t look too beta in that picture.  Courtney is girlishly affectionate to him, he seems to be keeping cool.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oddly, Kurt Cobain doesn&#8217;t look too beta in that picture.  Courtney is girlishly affectionate to him, he seems to be keeping cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/09/21/sex-in-the-90s/comment-page-1/#comment-10230</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1861#comment-10230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Say good bye to beta.  Say c ya to buffers.  Ya wanna be a man.. then stand up.  Frame.  Never Never forget... They are a plant... a flower.  They only can have what comes to them.  We are the bee&#039;s.  We are free. We go where we want.  So who has the advantage?  Take the honey.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say good bye to beta.  Say c ya to buffers.  Ya wanna be a man.. then stand up.  Frame.  Never Never forget&#8230; They are a plant&#8230; a flower.  They only can have what comes to them.  We are the bee&#8217;s.  We are free. We go where we want.  So who has the advantage?  Take the honey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobin Rote</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/09/21/sex-in-the-90s/comment-page-1/#comment-10229</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobin Rote]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 05:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1861#comment-10229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Mike C -- There was a definite shift where girls stepped up their game and got a lot more feminine but also started screening a lot harder (for &#039;dominance&#039; or bedroom prowess or provider qualities or whatever). You have to adjust for age differences, but I dated younger girls for as long as I could get away with it &amp; definitely saw it.

Can&#039;t pretend to explain it totally. Maybe girls were rebelling against their feminist castrating mothers? Products of the &#039;everyone is special&#039; (and gets a perfect mate) educational system? Economic uncertainty? A logical outcome of gender equity?

But I&#039;m reminded of some feminist who said &quot;Porn is the atomic bomb against the female psyche&quot;. When that got piped into everyone&#039;s house via the internet it caused a mass psychological shift, especially with the younger generation. Betas got really beta and girls figured  &#039;OK, if that&#039;s what you guys want...&quot;

Funny you mention 2005, as that was the year scoop-necked tops were in and every other woman was daring you to look into her cleavage instead of her eyes. Girls back in the 90s were wearing burkas in comparison.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Mike C &#8212; There was a definite shift where girls stepped up their game and got a lot more feminine but also started screening a lot harder (for &#8216;dominance&#8217; or bedroom prowess or provider qualities or whatever). You have to adjust for age differences, but I dated younger girls for as long as I could get away with it &amp; definitely saw it.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t pretend to explain it totally. Maybe girls were rebelling against their feminist castrating mothers? Products of the &#8216;everyone is special&#8217; (and gets a perfect mate) educational system? Economic uncertainty? A logical outcome of gender equity?</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m reminded of some feminist who said &#8220;Porn is the atomic bomb against the female psyche&#8221;. When that got piped into everyone&#8217;s house via the internet it caused a mass psychological shift, especially with the younger generation. Betas got really beta and girls figured  &#8216;OK, if that&#8217;s what you guys want&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Funny you mention 2005, as that was the year scoop-necked tops were in and every other woman was daring you to look into her cleavage instead of her eyes. Girls back in the 90s were wearing burkas in comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pliw</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/09/21/sex-in-the-90s/comment-page-1/#comment-10227</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pliw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 04:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1861#comment-10227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[primus- coattails of a deadman

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btHFguYFgJ0]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>primus- coattails of a deadman</p>
<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='490' height='306' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/btHFguYFgJ0?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0' allowfullscreen='true'></iframe></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobin Rote</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/09/21/sex-in-the-90s/comment-page-1/#comment-10226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobin Rote]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1861#comment-10226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@jimmy -- You&#039;re correct that there&#039;s a lot of good information out there, but the converse of that is that the Internet has no quality filter, so it&#039;s up to you to pick the peanuts out of the giganto turd. It&#039;s great there are so many resources and &quot;safe spaces&quot; for guys to hash this stuff out, but at the same time the inexperienced guy is still largely at square one and going to have to learn things the hard way.

(I read about some PUA instructors that weren&#039;t getting laid, but &quot;really knew the material&quot;, which IMO is symptomatic of that whole scene. [Or any scene where there&#039;s a bunch of systematized knowledge and jargon.] Those who can&#039;t do, teach, I guess.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jimmy &#8212; You&#8217;re correct that there&#8217;s a lot of good information out there, but the converse of that is that the Internet has no quality filter, so it&#8217;s up to you to pick the peanuts out of the giganto turd. It&#8217;s great there are so many resources and &#8220;safe spaces&#8221; for guys to hash this stuff out, but at the same time the inexperienced guy is still largely at square one and going to have to learn things the hard way.</p>
<p>(I read about some PUA instructors that weren&#8217;t getting laid, but &#8220;really knew the material&#8221;, which IMO is symptomatic of that whole scene. [Or any scene where there&#8217;s a bunch of systematized knowledge and jargon.] Those who can&#8217;t do, teach, I guess.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
