<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Value Added</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therationalmale.com/2012/07/16/value-added/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/07/16/value-added/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 21:53:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The &#8216;Real&#8217; Nice &#124;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/07/16/value-added/comment-page-1/#comment-40358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The &#8216;Real&#8217; Nice &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2014 20:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1587#comment-40358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] genuine appreciation of women. They certainly appreciate them on a by-need basis, and as a &#8216;value added&#8216; benefit, but the esoteric, self-actualizing concerns men believe women should prioritize as [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] genuine appreciation of women. They certainly appreciate them on a by-need basis, and as a &#8216;value added&#8216; benefit, but the esoteric, self-actualizing concerns men believe women should prioritize as [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links and Comments #10 &#124; The Society of Phineas</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/07/16/value-added/comment-page-1/#comment-20269</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Links and Comments #10 &#124; The Society of Phineas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 01:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1587#comment-20269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Value-Added &#8211; He&#8217;s SpecialFree Northerner responded to my response. I really don&#8217;t have [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Value-Added &#8211; He&#8217;s SpecialFree Northerner responded to my response. I really don&#8217;t have [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/07/16/value-added/comment-page-1/#comment-20073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1587#comment-20073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ John Galt 

Your an idiot for tapping it in the first place let alone as many times as you claim which is not humanly possible. If it is you can rest assured you have every STD microism and disease, known, unknown and those still evolving she picked up during her 10 YEARS of drugs and partying. ANY girl who is into drugs and partying is EASY and has a very high number count! Let alone 10 full years!  

That is absolutely disgusting. 

You just licked shit off a very dirty stick pal. Suggest you get and STD test. If you escape with anything less than HPV - it was only by sheer dumb luck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ John Galt </p>
<p>Your an idiot for tapping it in the first place let alone as many times as you claim which is not humanly possible. If it is you can rest assured you have every STD microism and disease, known, unknown and those still evolving she picked up during her 10 YEARS of drugs and partying. ANY girl who is into drugs and partying is EASY and has a very high number count! Let alone 10 full years!  </p>
<p>That is absolutely disgusting. </p>
<p>You just licked shit off a very dirty stick pal. Suggest you get and STD test. If you escape with anything less than HPV &#8211; it was only by sheer dumb luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Minter</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/07/16/value-added/comment-page-1/#comment-8049</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Minter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 01:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1587#comment-8049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am so far down in the comments no one will ever read this.  I have a new spin on the &quot;Love is Blind&quot; saying.  Most people interpret it as &quot;When you are in love your normal critical thinking about your mate diminishes.  You overlook bodily scents, some physical imperfections, behavior issues, social issues.  Later when the heat of passion ebbs then critical thinking returns.&quot;   

My new spin now is &quot;Now that you know all that you know about the motivations of women,  what the probable and possible outcomes of relationships are with her,  after many men have compared notes, after all of this new academic work has come out in Evolutionary Psychology,  new statistics are emerging,  how the law favors her and steps on you,  how dishonest, unfaithful, cruel, and wicked she is,  how duplicitous and calculating that she is in her pursuit of hypergamy,  then how could any man be so stupid as fall in love with her? You would have to be blind to reality.  How can you even begin to trust her love?  How could even sleep at night with her in the fucking house with you without one eye open?  How could consider any other option other than MGTOW or GAME?&quot;  

I just finished Niel Strauss&#039; book &quot;The Game&quot;.  At the end of it, he sort of disses on PUA as hollow,  pointless and he goes off into a relationship with that guitar playing woman from Courtney Love&#039;s band, Lisa.  So then I google for &quot;Lisa&quot; and hey, she dumped him in 2006.   So I wonder how he&#039;s feeling about the superiority of LTR over Game?  Wonder how Tom Cruise feels about it? 

So given that you cannot trust her in almost any way,  (at minimum, you are a fool if you do not respect the possibilities and the odds), then how could possibly trust any of these &quot;higher values&quot; that you refer?  What good is she to you other than as a sexual being.  In some blog it spoke of the Hierarchy of Love,  maybe here.  Men love women,  women love children, children love kitties.  She cannot return the same love that you give to her in the same manner a child cannot return love to his parents in the same way that they love him.   You have to assume that your wife is going fuck you in court.  You almost are a fool to sign a contract with her.  You are fool to marry her, to mix finances with her, to even make plans for your old age with her.  You wrote of War Brides and how they are adapted through evolution to switch allegiance on a dime when it fits her purpose.  You are fool to have children with her.  The act of having children increases your legal jeopardy so much that it is practically suicide financially.  The list of reasons to not trust anything she does or says is getting so long that you don&#039;t have enough characters possible in this comment block.  What is a legitimate question and what is shit test?  What is legitimate request for help from her and what is a domination to place you the role of kitchen bitch?  Coco Chanel said &quot;Women are the strong ones.  Men use woman as a little pillow that they can lay their heads on.  They seek the mother that held them as infants.&quot;   Fuck, I&#039;m grown ass man.  So you bet your ass I won&#039;t lay my head on another woman again in that manner as long I live.  I won&#039;t seek that same intimacy I used to look for when I was 20.  Fuck that.  She&#039;ll be thinking I&#039;m an infant.  So that&#039;s all over. I can go on and on. 

So if she isn&#039;t your friend or you can&#039;t really be truly intimate with her or she isn&#039;t your trusted financial partner or the trusted mother of your children or any way, the person that you think has your back,  then what is her value to you other than something to fuck?   Then why shouldn&#039;t men only measure her by SMV?  What good is she when it drops off the graph?   She don&#039;t mean a thing if she ain&#039;t got that zing. 

Sorry Rollo,  you may have your great LTR and everything but when is it gonna blow up in your face?  My sister and I are having knock down fights. My nephew is getting married in October and every one wants me to stay away from him and I am like &quot;you fools.  You are going to ruin his life.  She will divorce him&quot;.  The women in my family all have a lot of &quot;well if this and if that, if he does this, and they are both college educated and we look to at the half of marriages that work and yada yada&quot; and a whole lot of contingent reasoning.  My way, Plate theory, Game etc is 100% sure.  He may not be happy but I can guarantee he won&#039;t be as unhappy as he will be when this marriage comes crashing down.  

So if women have ruined everything about them and the only thing they are good for is sex, then why shouldn&#039;t we judge them only, and I mean only,  as potential sexual partners?

I ain&#039;t fucking bitter.  My ass is educated and aware.  This is legitimate intellectual question.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so far down in the comments no one will ever read this.  I have a new spin on the &#8220;Love is Blind&#8221; saying.  Most people interpret it as &#8220;When you are in love your normal critical thinking about your mate diminishes.  You overlook bodily scents, some physical imperfections, behavior issues, social issues.  Later when the heat of passion ebbs then critical thinking returns.&#8221;   </p>
<p>My new spin now is &#8220;Now that you know all that you know about the motivations of women,  what the probable and possible outcomes of relationships are with her,  after many men have compared notes, after all of this new academic work has come out in Evolutionary Psychology,  new statistics are emerging,  how the law favors her and steps on you,  how dishonest, unfaithful, cruel, and wicked she is,  how duplicitous and calculating that she is in her pursuit of hypergamy,  then how could any man be so stupid as fall in love with her? You would have to be blind to reality.  How can you even begin to trust her love?  How could even sleep at night with her in the fucking house with you without one eye open?  How could consider any other option other than MGTOW or GAME?&#8221;  </p>
<p>I just finished Niel Strauss&#8217; book &#8220;The Game&#8221;.  At the end of it, he sort of disses on PUA as hollow,  pointless and he goes off into a relationship with that guitar playing woman from Courtney Love&#8217;s band, Lisa.  So then I google for &#8220;Lisa&#8221; and hey, she dumped him in 2006.   So I wonder how he&#8217;s feeling about the superiority of LTR over Game?  Wonder how Tom Cruise feels about it? </p>
<p>So given that you cannot trust her in almost any way,  (at minimum, you are a fool if you do not respect the possibilities and the odds), then how could possibly trust any of these &#8220;higher values&#8221; that you refer?  What good is she to you other than as a sexual being.  In some blog it spoke of the Hierarchy of Love,  maybe here.  Men love women,  women love children, children love kitties.  She cannot return the same love that you give to her in the same manner a child cannot return love to his parents in the same way that they love him.   You have to assume that your wife is going fuck you in court.  You almost are a fool to sign a contract with her.  You are fool to marry her, to mix finances with her, to even make plans for your old age with her.  You wrote of War Brides and how they are adapted through evolution to switch allegiance on a dime when it fits her purpose.  You are fool to have children with her.  The act of having children increases your legal jeopardy so much that it is practically suicide financially.  The list of reasons to not trust anything she does or says is getting so long that you don&#8217;t have enough characters possible in this comment block.  What is a legitimate question and what is shit test?  What is legitimate request for help from her and what is a domination to place you the role of kitchen bitch?  Coco Chanel said &#8220;Women are the strong ones.  Men use woman as a little pillow that they can lay their heads on.  They seek the mother that held them as infants.&#8221;   Fuck, I&#8217;m grown ass man.  So you bet your ass I won&#8217;t lay my head on another woman again in that manner as long I live.  I won&#8217;t seek that same intimacy I used to look for when I was 20.  Fuck that.  She&#8217;ll be thinking I&#8217;m an infant.  So that&#8217;s all over. I can go on and on. </p>
<p>So if she isn&#8217;t your friend or you can&#8217;t really be truly intimate with her or she isn&#8217;t your trusted financial partner or the trusted mother of your children or any way, the person that you think has your back,  then what is her value to you other than something to fuck?   Then why shouldn&#8217;t men only measure her by SMV?  What good is she when it drops off the graph?   She don&#8217;t mean a thing if she ain&#8217;t got that zing. </p>
<p>Sorry Rollo,  you may have your great LTR and everything but when is it gonna blow up in your face?  My sister and I are having knock down fights. My nephew is getting married in October and every one wants me to stay away from him and I am like &#8220;you fools.  You are going to ruin his life.  She will divorce him&#8221;.  The women in my family all have a lot of &#8220;well if this and if that, if he does this, and they are both college educated and we look to at the half of marriages that work and yada yada&#8221; and a whole lot of contingent reasoning.  My way, Plate theory, Game etc is 100% sure.  He may not be happy but I can guarantee he won&#8217;t be as unhappy as he will be when this marriage comes crashing down.  </p>
<p>So if women have ruined everything about them and the only thing they are good for is sex, then why shouldn&#8217;t we judge them only, and I mean only,  as potential sexual partners?</p>
<p>I ain&#8217;t fucking bitter.  My ass is educated and aware.  This is legitimate intellectual question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xclampa</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/07/16/value-added/comment-page-1/#comment-7867</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xclampa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 08:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1587#comment-7867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot; Women will never come to appreciate men’s intrinsic sacrifices made for them without coming to terms with naturalistic side of Game and the SMP. Likewise men need to come to terms with the reality of their conditioning and the fem-centric Matrix in order to appreciate the gravity of their decision to commit to a formalized monogamy / marriage.&quot;

Am I right to understand that I will never fully appreciate how difficult it is for a guy to choose me over women with high SMV/at their SMV peak unless I fully embrace the rules of the game?

Gravity of decision like that, and the way men are conditioned... Wouldn&#039;t a 26-28 year old woman, somewhat established in life be less risky, and more attractive provided she has the looks than a 23 year old college student grasping adulthood and life in general? Having children with the former would seem a lot safer and reasonable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Women will never come to appreciate men’s intrinsic sacrifices made for them without coming to terms with naturalistic side of Game and the SMP. Likewise men need to come to terms with the reality of their conditioning and the fem-centric Matrix in order to appreciate the gravity of their decision to commit to a formalized monogamy / marriage.&#8221;</p>
<p>Am I right to understand that I will never fully appreciate how difficult it is for a guy to choose me over women with high SMV/at their SMV peak unless I fully embrace the rules of the game?</p>
<p>Gravity of decision like that, and the way men are conditioned&#8230; Wouldn&#8217;t a 26-28 year old woman, somewhat established in life be less risky, and more attractive provided she has the looks than a 23 year old college student grasping adulthood and life in general? Having children with the former would seem a lot safer and reasonable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linkage Is Good For You: 7-22-12: Holmes Killer Edition &#124; Society of Amateur Gentlemen</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/07/16/value-added/comment-page-1/#comment-7844</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linkage Is Good For You: 7-22-12: Holmes Killer Edition &#124; Society of Amateur Gentlemen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 04:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1587#comment-7844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Male &#8211; Value Added, The Wall, White Knight [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Male &#8211; Value Added, The Wall, White Knight [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glengarry</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/07/16/value-added/comment-page-1/#comment-7831</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glengarry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 12:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1587#comment-7831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;In this instance S repeats a common moan in that she expects men to appreciate the ‘value added’ elements of a woman’s persona in priority to her base attractiveness.&quot;

Awkwardly enough for such hopes, women&#039;s personas are more of a value subtract. Imagine someone sexually unattractive to you, a 50yo male say, behaving like a woman or perhaps like your wife. It&#039;s just not that great.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In this instance S repeats a common moan in that she expects men to appreciate the ‘value added’ elements of a woman’s persona in priority to her base attractiveness.&#8221;</p>
<p>Awkwardly enough for such hopes, women&#8217;s personas are more of a value subtract. Imagine someone sexually unattractive to you, a 50yo male say, behaving like a woman or perhaps like your wife. It&#8217;s just not that great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SouthTX</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/07/16/value-added/comment-page-1/#comment-7788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SouthTX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 02:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1587#comment-7788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That picture was interesting because of its location.  My deceased Father spoke those words as my Best Man when I married.  Truer words were never spoken.  But a girl has to Wife up if she is serious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That picture was interesting because of its location.  My deceased Father spoke those words as my Best Man when I married.  Truer words were never spoken.  But a girl has to Wife up if she is serious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
