<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Peacekeepers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therationalmale.com/2012/06/13/the-peacekeepers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/06/13/the-peacekeepers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 22:41:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mental Point of Origin &#124;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/06/13/the-peacekeepers/comment-page-1/#comment-68190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mental Point of Origin &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2014 00:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1448#comment-68190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] When men fall into relationships with authoritarian, feminine-primary women, their first thought about any particulars of their actions is how his woman will respond to it, not his own involvement or his motivations for it. Are you a peacekeeper? [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] When men fall into relationships with authoritarian, feminine-primary women, their first thought about any particulars of their actions is how his woman will respond to it, not his own involvement or his motivations for it. Are you a peacekeeper? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarriageFail</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/06/13/the-peacekeepers/comment-page-1/#comment-28113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MarriageFail]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 20:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1448#comment-28113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Biochemical research points to a natural four-year sexual cycle for the human female. This apparently allows enough time after childbirth for the average mother in a state of savagery to regain her ability to survive with­out male provisioning. A woman’s natural tendency is to “liberate” herself from her mate after that point. When her hormones prompt her to reproduce again, she simply takes a new mate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biochemical research points to a natural four-year sexual cycle for the human female. This apparently allows enough time after childbirth for the average mother in a state of savagery to regain her ability to survive with­out male provisioning. A woman’s natural tendency is to “liberate” herself from her mate after that point. When her hormones prompt her to reproduce again, she simply takes a new mate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flushing the Nest &#171;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/06/13/the-peacekeepers/comment-page-1/#comment-8728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flushing the Nest &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1448#comment-8728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] what seem, at the time, like small concessions to their women&#8217;s demands in exchange for keeping the peace and the legs open. The problem is that this progressively becomes a situation of death by a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] what seem, at the time, like small concessions to their women&#8217;s demands in exchange for keeping the peace and the legs open. The problem is that this progressively becomes a situation of death by a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Mentu</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/06/13/the-peacekeepers/comment-page-1/#comment-6869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Professor Mentu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1448#comment-6869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope Zac-no-sack keeps commenting. Such a perfect example of the scarcity mentality that leads men to sign over their life to one woman.

If you marry a woman for the right reasons, I still object on principle, but I&#039;ll concede that it can &quot;work&quot; because I&#039;ve seen it work. But get married for the reasons Zac listed, and you&#039;re nothing but a bitch who deserves what he gets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Zac-no-sack keeps commenting. Such a perfect example of the scarcity mentality that leads men to sign over their life to one woman.</p>
<p>If you marry a woman for the right reasons, I still object on principle, but I&#8217;ll concede that it can &#8220;work&#8221; because I&#8217;ve seen it work. But get married for the reasons Zac listed, and you&#8217;re nothing but a bitch who deserves what he gets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claefus</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/06/13/the-peacekeepers/comment-page-1/#comment-6828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claefus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1448#comment-6828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally, I think dicks are hilarious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think dicks are hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YOHAMI</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/06/13/the-peacekeepers/comment-page-1/#comment-6754</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YOHAMI]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1448#comment-6754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You get married with that mindset, and she will have divorced by when you&#039;re 50. Or, worse, she will still be with you but full of contempt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You get married with that mindset, and she will have divorced by when you&#8217;re 50. Or, worse, she will still be with you but full of contempt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bronan the Barbarian!</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/06/13/the-peacekeepers/comment-page-1/#comment-6752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bronan the Barbarian!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1448#comment-6752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zac the Bitch-Titted Eunuch is the manosphere&#039;s newest troll. Scarcity mentality and settling for the win. &quot;I have to lock down any woman before they&#039;re all taken and I wind up old and aloooooooone!!!! :( Rah rah marriage!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zac the Bitch-Titted Eunuch is the manosphere&#8217;s newest troll. Scarcity mentality and settling for the win. &#8220;I have to lock down any woman before they&#8217;re all taken and I wind up old and aloooooooone!!!! <span class='wp-smiley wp-emoji wp-emoji-sad' title=':('>:(</span> Rah rah marriage!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rollo Tomassi</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/06/13/the-peacekeepers/comment-page-1/#comment-6745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rollo Tomassi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1448#comment-6745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Mr. HUSsy, before I opine with a counterpoint to your recent and obvious, manosphere-wide effort to spam for the vajazzled hole that is postmasculine and HUS, allow me to draw your attention to the fact that I approve and publish each of your comments with full knowledge that you are a plugged-in mangina.

You see, here at Rational Male I value and encourage an open public discourse – unlike the admittedly censored, and meticulously scrubbed echo chamber Aunt Giggles needs in order to build better Betas. I&#039;m glad to see you&#039;ve decided to remove the plastic bubble wrap and cellophane that &quot;13 Minute Walsh&quot; needs her readers dressed in to enjoy her catharsis blog. Welcome., now onto your issues,..

I pulled up the report she was working from.  She references the report as &quot;The State of Our Unions, 2010:&quot;, and cherry picks some positive sounding stats.  What she conveniently left off after the colon was the rest of the title:&lt;a href=&quot;http://stateofourunions.org/2010/when-marriage-disappears.php&quot; title=&quot;When Marriage Disappears&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;When Marriage Disappears&lt;/a&gt;.  I only made it about 30 pages in, and had to step away.  It is absolutely brutal.

In the future, it may serve your understanding better to actually read the &#039;sources&#039; Aunt Giggles cites. As a rule of thumb, presume anything she&#039;s quoting is sanitized to fit her pro-beta narrative – in fact that&#039;s a pretty reasonable starting point when reading anything she posts or comments about. For chumps like you, it sounds good because &lt;i&gt;you want to believe&lt;/i&gt; the fantasy that the feminine imperative sells you.

&lt;blockquote&gt;There will be a point when you are 50-60 and you realize that picking up girls got old and all the best ones to be around long term have been found by other guys and you might just wish you got married.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Myth of the Lonely Old Man – Been there, done that.
https://rationalmale.wordpress.com/2011/09/12/the-myth-of-the-lonely-old-man/

You see, when you fall back on tired tropes like this it only highlights your mangina-ness; kind of like a turd in a punchbowl. What&#039;s ironic is that you are oblivious to the fact that the argument you&#039;re making is EXACTLY the same one used on women for centuries in order to get them to settle down with a man &quot;before it&#039;s too late.&quot; So thoroughly are you conditioned to believe the fem-centric is the normative that it never occurs to you that your appeals to men presumes they&#039;re subject to female conditions. 

That&#039;s the totality of equalism. Everyone is &#039;equal&#039;, but only in a feminine context. If men are just like women then why wouldn&#039;t they be subject to the same insecurities about long term provisioning and emotional support, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. HUSsy, before I opine with a counterpoint to your recent and obvious, manosphere-wide effort to spam for the vajazzled hole that is postmasculine and HUS, allow me to draw your attention to the fact that I approve and publish each of your comments with full knowledge that you are a plugged-in mangina.</p>
<p>You see, here at Rational Male I value and encourage an open public discourse – unlike the admittedly censored, and meticulously scrubbed echo chamber Aunt Giggles needs in order to build better Betas. I&#8217;m glad to see you&#8217;ve decided to remove the plastic bubble wrap and cellophane that &#8220;13 Minute Walsh&#8221; needs her readers dressed in to enjoy her catharsis blog. Welcome., now onto your issues,..</p>
<p>I pulled up the report she was working from.  She references the report as &#8220;The State of Our Unions, 2010:&#8221;, and cherry picks some positive sounding stats.  What she conveniently left off after the colon was the rest of the title:<a href="http://stateofourunions.org/2010/when-marriage-disappears.php" title="When Marriage Disappears" rel="nofollow">When Marriage Disappears</a>.  I only made it about 30 pages in, and had to step away.  It is absolutely brutal.</p>
<p>In the future, it may serve your understanding better to actually read the &#8216;sources&#8217; Aunt Giggles cites. As a rule of thumb, presume anything she&#8217;s quoting is sanitized to fit her pro-beta narrative – in fact that&#8217;s a pretty reasonable starting point when reading anything she posts or comments about. For chumps like you, it sounds good because <i>you want to believe</i> the fantasy that the feminine imperative sells you.</p>
<blockquote><p>There will be a point when you are 50-60 and you realize that picking up girls got old and all the best ones to be around long term have been found by other guys and you might just wish you got married.</p></blockquote>
<p>Myth of the Lonely Old Man – Been there, done that.<br />
<a href="https://rationalmale.wordpress.com/2011/09/12/the-myth-of-the-lonely-old-man/" rel="nofollow">https://rationalmale.wordpress.com/2011/09/12/the-myth-of-the-lonely-old-man/</a></p>
<p>You see, when you fall back on tired tropes like this it only highlights your mangina-ness; kind of like a turd in a punchbowl. What&#8217;s ironic is that you are oblivious to the fact that the argument you&#8217;re making is EXACTLY the same one used on women for centuries in order to get them to settle down with a man &#8220;before it&#8217;s too late.&#8221; So thoroughly are you conditioned to believe the fem-centric is the normative that it never occurs to you that your appeals to men presumes they&#8217;re subject to female conditions. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s the totality of equalism. Everyone is &#8216;equal&#8217;, but only in a feminine context. If men are just like women then why wouldn&#8217;t they be subject to the same insecurities about long term provisioning and emotional support, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
