<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Respect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/29/respect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/29/respect/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 20:37:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admiration &#38; Respect &#124;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/29/respect/comment-page-1/#comment-95882</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Admiration &#38; Respect &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 01:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1322#comment-95882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] delved into the dynamic of respect in the past, but what I was getting at with this was the ways in which women and men differ in [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] delved into the dynamic of respect in the past, but what I was getting at with this was the ways in which women and men differ in [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idealism &#124;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/29/respect/comment-page-1/#comment-93003</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Idealism &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 21:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1322#comment-93003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] back what their feminine-primary conditioning had him internalize. Just Be Yourself, treat her with respect, don&#8217;t objectify her, don&#8217;t try to be someone you&#8217;re not, are just a few of the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] back what their feminine-primary conditioning had him internalize. Just Be Yourself, treat her with respect, don&#8217;t objectify her, don&#8217;t try to be someone you&#8217;re not, are just a few of the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigern77</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/29/respect/comment-page-1/#comment-6737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigern77]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1322#comment-6737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is something just not right with your writing/thinking Rollo.  Either that or I&#039;m getting pre-senile dementia.  Lots of non-sequiturs or bizarrely unclear explanations.  Here is just a tidbit:

&quot;You’ll get the standard “powerful women are a threat to men’s egos” line implying that women in other countries are ‘less powerful’ due to weak men preferring them.&quot;

This sentence nearly destroyed my entire brain, until I figured out what you meant to write, or at least, how I would have written it would have been:

&quot;You’ll get the standard “powerful women are a threat to men’s egos” line, implying that only weak men prefer women from other countries, since such women are &quot;less powerful&quot; .&quot;

Multiply such strange sentences by 50 and mix everything up randomly so explanations are not logically organized, and voila, you have a Rollo blog post.

It&#039;s difficult to quite put my finger on what is wrong with your writing.  Never seen anything like it.  I&#039;d guessed, that English is perhaps not your mother tongue, but even if that&#039;s so, there&#039;d still be something wrong with your thinking/conceptualisation.  Which is also bizarre, because it&#039;s evident that most of your posts contain some truly profound and intelligent observations (inasmuch as they can be deriddled from the source text).

I know this post sounds offensive, but I mean no offense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is something just not right with your writing/thinking Rollo.  Either that or I&#8217;m getting pre-senile dementia.  Lots of non-sequiturs or bizarrely unclear explanations.  Here is just a tidbit:</p>
<p>&#8220;You’ll get the standard “powerful women are a threat to men’s egos” line implying that women in other countries are ‘less powerful’ due to weak men preferring them.&#8221;</p>
<p>This sentence nearly destroyed my entire brain, until I figured out what you meant to write, or at least, how I would have written it would have been:</p>
<p>&#8220;You’ll get the standard “powerful women are a threat to men’s egos” line, implying that only weak men prefer women from other countries, since such women are &#8220;less powerful&#8221; .&#8221;</p>
<p>Multiply such strange sentences by 50 and mix everything up randomly so explanations are not logically organized, and voila, you have a Rollo blog post.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s difficult to quite put my finger on what is wrong with your writing.  Never seen anything like it.  I&#8217;d guessed, that English is perhaps not your mother tongue, but even if that&#8217;s so, there&#8217;d still be something wrong with your thinking/conceptualisation.  Which is also bizarre, because it&#8217;s evident that most of your posts contain some truly profound and intelligent observations (inasmuch as they can be deriddled from the source text).</p>
<p>I know this post sounds offensive, but I mean no offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daddy Issues &#171;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/29/respect/comment-page-1/#comment-6677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daddy Issues &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1322#comment-6677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] code in the feminine Matrix. As per the preset dictates of the Matrix, Mom is celebrated. loved and respected by default by virtue of her femaleness; Dad, if not outright vilified and publicly excoriated, is always [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] code in the feminine Matrix. As per the preset dictates of the Matrix, Mom is celebrated. loved and respected by default by virtue of her femaleness; Dad, if not outright vilified and publicly excoriated, is always [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/29/respect/comment-page-1/#comment-6219</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1322#comment-6219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bang on... I learned long ago people do not &quot;deserve&quot; respect - they have to &quot;earn&quot; it. Expecting it - isn&#039;t earning it and only gets contempt from me. Fortunately, I don&#039; t have to have respect for the women I interact with - I have to see value in that interaction from my perspective. If she earns my respect great - but in the overall scheme of things, it isn&#039;t necessary or required. 

I find the idea that I&#039;m supposed to respect someone I don&#039;t know as ludicrous. In general the vast majority of people are blithering idiots - I&#039;ve found that assuming that to be the case is usually about right. If a woman wants my respect, she has to earn it just like a man - isn&#039;t that what the feminist all say they wanted? Equality? 

Well, women have it in my mind. They are all equal - not equal to a man, but all men are equal and all women are equal - until they prove differently. I remember a woman spouting the &quot;all men and women are equal&quot; non-sense and I picked up a dumbbell and handed it around the room, universally, the women could barely hold it with both hands. When it made its way back to me I put it down and said - every man could move that with one hand, every woman needed both - do you see that as &quot;equal&quot;? It made the point and the women shut up. My point was that starting assumptions are a good place to start - as your needs become more specific you have to move more and more toward specific individuals with that skill. No one is &quot;equal&quot; to anyone else - each person has strengths and weaknesses and my goal is to find those. Spouting non-sense, doesn&#039;t help in that and just confuses things.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bang on&#8230; I learned long ago people do not &#8220;deserve&#8221; respect &#8211; they have to &#8220;earn&#8221; it. Expecting it &#8211; isn&#8217;t earning it and only gets contempt from me. Fortunately, I don&#8217; t have to have respect for the women I interact with &#8211; I have to see value in that interaction from my perspective. If she earns my respect great &#8211; but in the overall scheme of things, it isn&#8217;t necessary or required. </p>
<p>I find the idea that I&#8217;m supposed to respect someone I don&#8217;t know as ludicrous. In general the vast majority of people are blithering idiots &#8211; I&#8217;ve found that assuming that to be the case is usually about right. If a woman wants my respect, she has to earn it just like a man &#8211; isn&#8217;t that what the feminist all say they wanted? Equality? </p>
<p>Well, women have it in my mind. They are all equal &#8211; not equal to a man, but all men are equal and all women are equal &#8211; until they prove differently. I remember a woman spouting the &#8220;all men and women are equal&#8221; non-sense and I picked up a dumbbell and handed it around the room, universally, the women could barely hold it with both hands. When it made its way back to me I put it down and said &#8211; every man could move that with one hand, every woman needed both &#8211; do you see that as &#8220;equal&#8221;? It made the point and the women shut up. My point was that starting assumptions are a good place to start &#8211; as your needs become more specific you have to move more and more toward specific individuals with that skill. No one is &#8220;equal&#8221; to anyone else &#8211; each person has strengths and weaknesses and my goal is to find those. Spouting non-sense, doesn&#8217;t help in that and just confuses things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You have one gender with contact with reality but no emotional lexicon. And the other gender with emotional lexicon but no contact with reality. &#124; YOHAMI</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/29/respect/comment-page-1/#comment-6195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[You have one gender with contact with reality but no emotional lexicon. And the other gender with emotional lexicon but no contact with reality. &#124; YOHAMI]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 18:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1322#comment-6195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] like children and get a free pass and have other people to take on the consequences for them and free respect and the natural entitlement that follows… no. They have access to a wider range of emotions, but [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] like children and get a free pass and have other people to take on the consequences for them and free respect and the natural entitlement that follows… no. They have access to a wider range of emotions, but [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: empathologicalism</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/29/respect/comment-page-1/#comment-6180</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[empathologicalism]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 11:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1322#comment-6180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well yes, I note the difference in the women in Western and Eastern Europe as I travel around several times a year into those regions. Its hard to figure, high degree of feminist belief, yet decidedly feminine women who are a pleasure to deal with, easy to talk to, and just seemingly good at relating to men. Again I can&#039;t make this fit my Americanized expectations. They have quotas and all sorts of progressive beliefs, lack much in any form of religion, and they are overtly female in their acting out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well yes, I note the difference in the women in Western and Eastern Europe as I travel around several times a year into those regions. Its hard to figure, high degree of feminist belief, yet decidedly feminine women who are a pleasure to deal with, easy to talk to, and just seemingly good at relating to men. Again I can&#8217;t make this fit my Americanized expectations. They have quotas and all sorts of progressive beliefs, lack much in any form of religion, and they are overtly female in their acting out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikec74</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/29/respect/comment-page-1/#comment-6168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikec74]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 22:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1322#comment-6168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Stingray]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stingray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
