<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Relational Equity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/21/relational-equity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/21/relational-equity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 22:58:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Memento Mori &#124;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/21/relational-equity/comment-page-1/#comment-89024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Memento Mori &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 05:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1348#comment-89024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] like genuine desire, cannot be negotiated for. Whatever your misguided concept is about how Relational Equity should merit a woman&#8217;s sympathy or respect, those are only valid and genuine when a woman [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] like genuine desire, cannot be negotiated for. Whatever your misguided concept is about how Relational Equity should merit a woman&#8217;s sympathy or respect, those are only valid and genuine when a woman [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Red Pill Lens &#124;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/21/relational-equity/comment-page-1/#comment-76480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Red Pill Lens &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 20:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1348#comment-76480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Alpha providers, while being an idealistic character, can exist, but are they realistic? I&#8217;d propose that embodying this role has become one of being seen too readily as a Beta by women due to the unbelievability of it. Does men&#8217;s romantic nature predispose them to thinking they can adequately fulfill this role? Does that romanticism expect women to be receptive and appreciative of it? Is that expectation on of investing in Relational Equity? [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Alpha providers, while being an idealistic character, can exist, but are they realistic? I&#8217;d propose that embodying this role has become one of being seen too readily as a Beta by women due to the unbelievability of it. Does men&#8217;s romantic nature predispose them to thinking they can adequately fulfill this role? Does that romanticism expect women to be receptive and appreciative of it? Is that expectation on of investing in Relational Equity? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boundaries &#124;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/21/relational-equity/comment-page-1/#comment-68803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boundaries &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1348#comment-68803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The first being a moral high-ground idea that women do in fact have a moral or rational agency and thus have an obligation to keep their own Hypergamy in check. This may be from a religious perspective, but more often it&#8217;s based upon men&#8217;s idealistic equalist hopes that a woman can rationally be expected to parse her own investment in what men think should be Relational Equity. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The first being a moral high-ground idea that women do in fact have a moral or rational agency and thus have an obligation to keep their own Hypergamy in check. This may be from a religious perspective, but more often it&#8217;s based upon men&#8217;s idealistic equalist hopes that a woman can rationally be expected to parse her own investment in what men think should be Relational Equity. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trophies &#124;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/21/relational-equity/comment-page-1/#comment-45010</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trophies &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 03:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1348#comment-45010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] into a marriage with only the best of intentions. In a sense it was the female flip side of the Relational Equity fallacy found predominantly in men [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] into a marriage with only the best of intentions. In a sense it was the female flip side of the Relational Equity fallacy found predominantly in men [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owed Sex &#124;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/21/relational-equity/comment-page-1/#comment-43128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Owed Sex &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 04:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1348#comment-43128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] anyone unacquainted with the fallacy of Relational Equity, I&#8217;d suggest reading that post to get some familiarity. Relational Equity is the idea that [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] anyone unacquainted with the fallacy of Relational Equity, I&#8217;d suggest reading that post to get some familiarity. Relational Equity is the idea that [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The &#8216;Real&#8217; Nice &#124;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/21/relational-equity/comment-page-1/#comment-40353</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The &#8216;Real&#8217; Nice &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2014 20:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1348#comment-40353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] the hope for Relational Equity and an appreciation for being [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the hope for Relational Equity and an appreciation for being [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preventative Medicine – Part IV &#124;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/21/relational-equity/comment-page-1/#comment-36255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Preventative Medicine – Part IV &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 23:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1348#comment-36255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] with. This is the turning point at which most Beta men, hopefully reliant upon the false notions of Relational Equity, find themselves on the sharp end of the feminine hypergamy they cognitively dissociated themselves [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] with. This is the turning point at which most Beta men, hopefully reliant upon the false notions of Relational Equity, find themselves on the sharp end of the feminine hypergamy they cognitively dissociated themselves [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preventative Medicine – Part III &#124;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/21/relational-equity/comment-page-1/#comment-35739</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Preventative Medicine – Part III &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 04:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1348#comment-35739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] a woman&#8217;s party years &#8220;indiscretions&#8221;, he believes, will be an investment in Relational Equity any &#8216;rational&#8217; woman will [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a woman&#8217;s party years &#8220;indiscretions&#8221;, he believes, will be an investment in Relational Equity any &#8216;rational&#8217; woman will [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
