Comments on: Coquetry http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/11/coquetry/ Thu, 09 Apr 2015 21:33:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Bluepillprofessor http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/11/coquetry/comment-page-1/#comment-45333 Thu, 03 Jul 2014 23:58:33 +0000 http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1295#comment-45333 Had to laugh at Andrews ridiculous ‘we are not pack animals.’ Let me guess, we are not even animals. We may have darker instincts but we can use our higher brain to control them. Right? Right.

I regularly study The Art of Seduction and I always wondered how coquetry worked for men but then I am the insatiable Rake with two temperatures- hot and hotter- so I don’t have a frame of reference for behaving indifferent or cold. A guy can ACT hot and cold but girls really ARE that way which is why it is so effective.

]]> By: Preventative Medicine – Part II | http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/11/coquetry/comment-page-1/#comment-34648 Thu, 27 Mar 2014 02:42:14 +0000 http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1295#comment-34648 […] men discover that women in this demographic, by necessity, lean more on overt communication. The coquetry, indirectness and blasé indifference that she used to hold and enjoy male attentions during her […]

]]> By: Grim http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/11/coquetry/comment-page-1/#comment-28306 Fri, 10 Jan 2014 20:53:14 +0000 http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1295#comment-28306 Good lord is Andrew misinformed.

]]> By: Rollo Tomassi http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/11/coquetry/comment-page-1/#comment-26284 Thu, 05 Dec 2013 05:00:32 +0000 http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1295#comment-26284 The simple fact that you think that the manosphere uniformly defines Alpha etymologically (google it) only highlights your ignorance of it.

Maybe you should’ve just started here first:
http://therationalmale.com/2011/10/20/alpha/

]]> By: Andrew http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/11/coquetry/comment-page-1/#comment-26282 Thu, 05 Dec 2013 04:52:44 +0000 http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1295#comment-26282 This is a good example of the logical fallacy you are using.
I am a big on pointing out basic assumptions in the manosphere that are false.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_projection_fallacy
I just went and read the manboobz site and it is just another feminist load of crap. It hurt my eyes to read the comments and trolling going on
You people really are in some tug of war.
Yet the battle is lost because you guys got no scroats….
Not different than the pack of wannabe alphas who attack in packs on your comments Rolo, when someone doesn’t agree with manosphere dogma.
BTW, if everyone is an alpha here, how come you aren’t fighting each other for dominance over who controls the website?

]]> By: Rollo Tomassi http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/11/coquetry/comment-page-1/#comment-26276 Thu, 05 Dec 2013 04:12:46 +0000 http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1295#comment-26276 You sure you don’t want to link back to Manboobz’ take on Alpha males?

]]> By: Andrew http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/11/coquetry/comment-page-1/#comment-26270 Thu, 05 Dec 2013 03:47:46 +0000 http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1295#comment-26270 Humans are primates. Not canines.

Here is an excellent link proving the whole “Alpha male” bullshit you are spreading is a lie
http://www.leecharleskelley.com/top10myths/mythofthepackleader.html

]]> By: YOHAMI http://therationalmale.com/2012/05/11/coquetry/comment-page-1/#comment-26268 Thu, 05 Dec 2013 03:29:32 +0000 http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1295#comment-26268 “Humans are not pack animals.”

Yeah right.

]]>