Comments on: Is There Anything Good About Men?

By: Scott

Scott — Sun, 08 Apr 2012 20:10:24 +0000

In this society many boys are socialized into being like females instead of becoming men (especially in schools). Many men and women end up doing jobs they don’t like that also usually don’t have any significant value and then they die. Women are not the enemy. I don’t fall for the divide tactic. Historically men protected their women and children, now usually without any life or death outside dangers they are just about going to schools/get a job to pay the bills/watch tv/die. Men had to physically Alpha type masculine compete for resources (food, women, etc). In the current (information, financial) society betas (intelligence based) can more easily rise to the top of the culture (the article didn’t differentiate this from a Game stand point). Contraception changed the game and cultures. Because I do not want a old fashioned traditional homemaker wife to cook and clean for me; I am in favor of women having jobs (such as, designing and wearing lingerie) and I accept if other men hate me for it as I don’t care what others think or say about me anyway. I’m selfish and this benefits myself, women, and society. I have had old women be affectionate to me and affection is over-rated and I do not need or want affection (and this is what the feminized dating industry tells guys that affection is what men and women want). Modern war is now more about ideologies (religions, beliefs, views of culture), and it’s heating up globally.

By: Emma the Emo

Emma the Emo — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:26:30 +0000

It is shallow because you don’t know your leader or follower all that closely. Followers are replaceable (not leaders though, but you don’t know what they are like inside). It’s not shallower because it’s worse and less useful or moral somehow.

By: Emma the Emo

Emma the Emo — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:20:15 +0000

That means that someone can have good imagination, but no ambition or drive to put it to use. Just like you can have great math skills and creative ways of solving math problems, but you don’t like math… I don’t think talent and the drive to use it are always present together in the same person.

By: emmatheemo

emmatheemo — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:13:30 +0000

About creativity. It’s possible that men evolved to be more ambitious, regardless of competition – it’s in their favor to be more ambitous and striving without consciously thinking “I’m doing this because if I win/create something genius, I will gets loads of pussy”, just like they don’t think “I want to procreate” while having sex.

By: Stingray

Stingray — Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:58:21 +0000

That is exactly one big reason for my hesitation.

Consider this a Your’re Welcome and I hope I don’t disappoint in the future.

Thank you, again.

By: jim

jim — Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:54:29 +0000

Men define and achieve goals

women live off the fruits of that achievement..and have forgotten that the original achievement ever existed in the first place.

women believe that they have denied their rightful place in society when in fact they were never the builders of that society…they were the caretakers of the next generation..but again apes and chicken care for their young,

but human males conceived of civilization and built it

By: Arch

Arch — Sun, 01 Apr 2012 19:36:43 +0000

A logical fallacy I keep seeing repeated in pieces like these is that men and women’s behavior is different because of their specialization throughout evolutionary history yet men and women somehow still have all the same skill sets and are exactly alike except for the plumbing.

You can’t have it both ways. Evolution isn’t about accruing advantages. It’s about trading one advantage for another. The same evolutionary force which would specialize men and women in behavior would cause each sex to gain and lose skills over time.

Women don’t need spatial reasoning to nurture. Men don’t need emotional reasoning to hunt and kill.

By: YOHAMI

YOHAMI — Sun, 01 Apr 2012 19:23:47 +0000

*desirable by many