<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pseudo-Virginity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/26/pseudo-virginity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/26/pseudo-virginity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 21:53:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chastity, once lost, is forever gone &#124; Atavisionary</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/26/pseudo-virginity/comment-page-1/#comment-74649</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chastity, once lost, is forever gone &#124; Atavisionary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 21:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1101#comment-74649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] I noticed about the reddit post is that the sentiment is suspiciously similar to the whole &#8220;born-again virgin&#8221; nonsense that has become popular in some Christian communities. The idea being that if a [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I noticed about the reddit post is that the sentiment is suspiciously similar to the whole &#8220;born-again virgin&#8221; nonsense that has become popular in some Christian communities. The idea being that if a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cervantesscthree</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/26/pseudo-virginity/comment-page-1/#comment-21165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cervantesscthree]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 11:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1101#comment-21165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;On the other hand a woman with only one prior Alpha lover may be impossible to convince to be loyal to anyone she sees as a lesser experience.&quot; 

So how would you know whether she&#039;s an alpha widow or an unfortunate beta collector?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;On the other hand a woman with only one prior Alpha lover may be impossible to convince to be loyal to anyone she sees as a lesser experience.&#8221; </p>
<p>So how would you know whether she&#8217;s an alpha widow or an unfortunate beta collector?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Context &#171; the professor</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/26/pseudo-virginity/comment-page-1/#comment-10168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A. Context &#171; the professor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 13:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1101#comment-10168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Notch count - http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/2012/03/26/pseudo-virginity/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Notch count &#8211; http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/2012/03/26/pseudo-virginity/ [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: el diablo verde</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/26/pseudo-virginity/comment-page-1/#comment-5767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[el diablo verde]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1101#comment-5767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I’d argue that most female initiated infidelity is a result of hypergamous impulse seeking to find its previous level.&quot;

I wholeheartedly agree with your statement, &quot;most&quot; being the key operative in the context of my comment. Having experienced a post-LTR shitstorm that forced the red pill upon me, I hope for the sake of my ex - and especially for that of the child we had together - that she&#039;s an exception to the rule. I fear however that she&#039;s not.

Having a spotted history of alpha and high-beta relationships - I was a high beta with zero conscious game who made considerable sacrifices to be with her and start a family with her - my ex ended up leaving me after two years for an utterly gameless white knight omega (dated/slept with *one* girl throughout his 20s, talked a lot about his feelings and his desire for a family, &lt;i&gt;habitually came on to unavailable women...&lt;/i&gt;). So as I see it she rationalized away a few glaring details about this guy that most women would have found suspicious/creepy, opting instead to (1) ignore her predilection for more dominant men and (2) flee to the extreme providership of a &quot;wise&quot; (her term), gentle romantic. Three months into their [formal] relationship they were engaged; six months in they were pregnant.

I&#039;d be curious to know if any other readers have witnessed similarly blunt about-faces from alpha widows. Does this new relationship have any chance of survival? I&#039;m committed to providing a solid foundation for my son (while &lt;i&gt;loving&lt;/i&gt; my renewed bachelorhood :D), but in a split-custody situation I cannot insulate entirely against the fallout that would likely result from my ex (early 30&#039;s, *at* the Wall, and of course soon to have a 2nd child by a 2nd father) changing course again. Can anyone reassure me here?

Great post as usual, RT. Your writing is among the most balanced and positive that I&#039;ve come across.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’d argue that most female initiated infidelity is a result of hypergamous impulse seeking to find its previous level.&#8221;</p>
<p>I wholeheartedly agree with your statement, &#8220;most&#8221; being the key operative in the context of my comment. Having experienced a post-LTR shitstorm that forced the red pill upon me, I hope for the sake of my ex &#8211; and especially for that of the child we had together &#8211; that she&#8217;s an exception to the rule. I fear however that she&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>Having a spotted history of alpha and high-beta relationships &#8211; I was a high beta with zero conscious game who made considerable sacrifices to be with her and start a family with her &#8211; my ex ended up leaving me after two years for an utterly gameless white knight omega (dated/slept with *one* girl throughout his 20s, talked a lot about his feelings and his desire for a family, <i>habitually came on to unavailable women&#8230;</i>). So as I see it she rationalized away a few glaring details about this guy that most women would have found suspicious/creepy, opting instead to (1) ignore her predilection for more dominant men and (2) flee to the extreme providership of a &#8220;wise&#8221; (her term), gentle romantic. Three months into their [formal] relationship they were engaged; six months in they were pregnant.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be curious to know if any other readers have witnessed similarly blunt about-faces from alpha widows. Does this new relationship have any chance of survival? I&#8217;m committed to providing a solid foundation for my son (while <i>loving</i> my renewed bachelorhood :D), but in a split-custody situation I cannot insulate entirely against the fallout that would likely result from my ex (early 30&#8217;s, *at* the Wall, and of course soon to have a 2nd child by a 2nd father) changing course again. Can anyone reassure me here?</p>
<p>Great post as usual, RT. Your writing is among the most balanced and positive that I&#8217;ve come across.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam the Bam</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/26/pseudo-virginity/comment-page-1/#comment-5728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tam the Bam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 22:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1101#comment-5728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;There have been some entertaining experimental studies on men’s innate ability of recognizing their own children’s faces amongst a crowd of uniformly dressed kids; Men are more accurate and faster to identify their kids in a crowd than women.&quot;

I&#039;ve noticed that, but concluded that many of the mommies at the gate had piss-poor eyesight (a suspicion backed up by they way they drove to and from), and appeared to become confused and disoriented by any number larger than pie. Or profiteroles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There have been some entertaining experimental studies on men’s innate ability of recognizing their own children’s faces amongst a crowd of uniformly dressed kids; Men are more accurate and faster to identify their kids in a crowd than women.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that, but concluded that many of the mommies at the gate had piss-poor eyesight (a suspicion backed up by they way they drove to and from), and appeared to become confused and disoriented by any number larger than pie. Or profiteroles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/26/pseudo-virginity/comment-page-1/#comment-4573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 03:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1101#comment-4573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to totally bash marriage (as it&#039;s fine if people want to), but I am floored by the number of men (especially those who comprehend the issue of divorce, and even more so those who know some game) who still WANT to get married, and saying I&#039;m floored is outstanding because I am now on a Stand-Up Desk (better for the back, but usually more typos). Not to start an argument (I&#039;m not a feminist nor a whiny white-knight), but my OPINION according to my Alpha-Logic about the many guys who say (in an Open society in 2012) &quot;women (of legal age who are not legally married) CAN NOT have more than 1 sexual partner (these guys desperately want her to be with ONLY him) or else she is a so-called &quot;slut&quot; and that ONLY men CAN have more than 1 sexual partner while double-standardly not calling himself a &quot;slut&quot; is another made-up wishful thinking belief/MYTH (and I&#039;m not saying that &quot;slut&quot; is a &quot;shameful/bad/dirty word&quot; as I&#039;m saying that unless someone is legally married they are BOTH free to have more than 1 sexual partner) and even a bunch of game bloggers and 99.8% of men would attack calling this myth because even they still have a Madonna/Whore Complex and the guys who call women sluts are in a fantasy where they have a mommy-wife who is their pure producer of pure children and thus his c*ck remains pure too (him with other women is like how he can mentally project himself into the scene of a solo woman getting off or even a lesbian scene, but if the scene is a man with a woman he knows it&#039;s not HIS c*ck so he doesn&#039;t want to look).
I had an older woman (with 3 kids from a previous marriage that ended in divorce) and an older man (who used to be alpha but became an omega-provider daddy figure to this woman, he also had 2 kids from a previous marriage that ended in divorce) BOTH say how because they had now got religion going to church/plus that they had not had s*x in over a year that they BOTH were now (out of the Blue) completely pure born-again-v*rgins, and saying to them no in reality you are not (they will NOT hear any of it, so their fantasy bubble is not popped). Not that I care, as I am not a self-righteous person, and I don&#039;t give a f*ck about OTHER peoples s*x lives, but these people ARE extremely self-righteous and say things about OTHER people often but in their delusional minds THEY are the only ones who are right.   
It&#039;s funny when guys say &quot;I have an I don&#039;t give a f*ck attitude,&quot; but then they list off 302 things that bother them (as they also want you to listen to them complain about). I don&#039;t complain.
Suggesting that an Alpha man is concerned with &quot;morality and rules&quot; 
(LOL).
Rollo is an Alpha (or at least has the mental framework and enough external behavior of an Alpha) to have a Great marriage because that is what he decides to do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to totally bash marriage (as it&#8217;s fine if people want to), but I am floored by the number of men (especially those who comprehend the issue of divorce, and even more so those who know some game) who still WANT to get married, and saying I&#8217;m floored is outstanding because I am now on a Stand-Up Desk (better for the back, but usually more typos). Not to start an argument (I&#8217;m not a feminist nor a whiny white-knight), but my OPINION according to my Alpha-Logic about the many guys who say (in an Open society in 2012) &#8220;women (of legal age who are not legally married) CAN NOT have more than 1 sexual partner (these guys desperately want her to be with ONLY him) or else she is a so-called &#8220;slut&#8221; and that ONLY men CAN have more than 1 sexual partner while double-standardly not calling himself a &#8220;slut&#8221; is another made-up wishful thinking belief/MYTH (and I&#8217;m not saying that &#8220;slut&#8221; is a &#8220;shameful/bad/dirty word&#8221; as I&#8217;m saying that unless someone is legally married they are BOTH free to have more than 1 sexual partner) and even a bunch of game bloggers and 99.8% of men would attack calling this myth because even they still have a Madonna/Whore Complex and the guys who call women sluts are in a fantasy where they have a mommy-wife who is their pure producer of pure children and thus his c*ck remains pure too (him with other women is like how he can mentally project himself into the scene of a solo woman getting off or even a lesbian scene, but if the scene is a man with a woman he knows it&#8217;s not HIS c*ck so he doesn&#8217;t want to look).<br />
I had an older woman (with 3 kids from a previous marriage that ended in divorce) and an older man (who used to be alpha but became an omega-provider daddy figure to this woman, he also had 2 kids from a previous marriage that ended in divorce) BOTH say how because they had now got religion going to church/plus that they had not had s*x in over a year that they BOTH were now (out of the Blue) completely pure born-again-v*rgins, and saying to them no in reality you are not (they will NOT hear any of it, so their fantasy bubble is not popped). Not that I care, as I am not a self-righteous person, and I don&#8217;t give a f*ck about OTHER peoples s*x lives, but these people ARE extremely self-righteous and say things about OTHER people often but in their delusional minds THEY are the only ones who are right.<br />
It&#8217;s funny when guys say &#8220;I have an I don&#8217;t give a f*ck attitude,&#8221; but then they list off 302 things that bother them (as they also want you to listen to them complain about). I don&#8217;t complain.<br />
Suggesting that an Alpha man is concerned with &#8220;morality and rules&#8221;<br />
(LOL).<br />
Rollo is an Alpha (or at least has the mental framework and enough external behavior of an Alpha) to have a Great marriage because that is what he decides to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Father Knows Best: Holy Week Edition &#171; Patriactionary</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/26/pseudo-virginity/comment-page-1/#comment-4340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Father Knows Best: Holy Week Edition &#171; Patriactionary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 17:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1101#comment-4340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Tomassi: Pseudo-Virginity (HT: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Tomassi: Pseudo-Virginity (HT: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linkage is Good for You: Support In Mala Fide and Get Free Stuff Edition</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/26/pseudo-virginity/comment-page-1/#comment-4309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linkage is Good for You: Support In Mala Fide and Get Free Stuff Edition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1101#comment-4309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] More&#8220;, &#8220;Thermonuclear Anger Game: Tactical Rage&#8221;Rollo Tomassi &#8211; &#8220;Pseudo-Virginity&#8220;, &#8220;Dread Games&#8220;, &#8220;HB10&#8221;Samplexus &#8211; &#8220;The Workplace [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] More&#8220;, &#8220;Thermonuclear Anger Game: Tactical Rage&#8221;Rollo Tomassi &#8211; &#8220;Pseudo-Virginity&#8220;, &#8220;Dread Games&#8220;, &#8220;HB10&#8221;Samplexus &#8211; &#8220;The Workplace [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
