<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solipsistic Logic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/22/solipsistic-logic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/22/solipsistic-logic/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 21:14:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/22/solipsistic-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-58602</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 23:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1082#comment-58602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Must I acknowledge this as a usual case of solipsism? Is there any hope that this may be an extreme, &quot;industrial strength&quot; case?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must I acknowledge this as a usual case of solipsism? Is there any hope that this may be an extreme, &#8220;industrial strength&#8221; case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/22/solipsistic-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-43022</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 02:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1082#comment-43022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;To see this in action all a guy needs to do is read any manosphere comment thread to see the frequency with which women will apply their personal, anecdotal experiences to a situation and presume her experience is the global, universally applicable, reality.&quot; 

Did it not occur to you that you are commiting this error as well by using an anectoadal story about your wife? You asked a woman a math question, she gave a confused response, and you apply this as universal to all &quot;average&quot; women.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;To see this in action all a guy needs to do is read any manosphere comment thread to see the frequency with which women will apply their personal, anecdotal experiences to a situation and presume her experience is the global, universally applicable, reality.&#8221; </p>
<p>Did it not occur to you that you are commiting this error as well by using an anectoadal story about your wife? You asked a woman a math question, she gave a confused response, and you apply this as universal to all &#8220;average&#8221; women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/22/solipsistic-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-21070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 03:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1082#comment-21070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is interesting, but I think you&#039;re only partially right.

Your wife (is that you who wrote this? Sorry, first time here...) obviously likes the attention your giving her.  Once or twice in there (I didn&#039;t finish the entire video -- stopped when you started explaining the methodology...) you could almost see her just beginning to smile...I think they call those micro-expressions.  And yes, I&#039;m proud of that word, it&#039;s the first time I&#039;ve used it in written dialogue.

My point is that, I think you&#039;re right that your wife (?) is using solipsistic reasoning, but I also think that she&#039;s using it because she likes the attention AND you give it to her.  I actually think that when she comments on it being less than an hour, it&#039;s a ruse to get you involved because she knows she&#039;s getting closer to the answer....

To be honest, it kind of reminds me of my 8-year niece whom I saw yesterday for the first time in a long, long, long time.  (Long story behind that one...)  She was beginning to tell stories about herself that bordered on lies.  One might say that were childish embellishments. The concern of course is that she&#039;s developign some sort of lying disorder, which is probably not the case.  She probably likes the attention.  She made silly faces, talked about poop, and anything else to get the attention.

You&#039;ll probably disagree.  Oh well, I&#039;m used to be wrong.

Thanks for the awesome post!  Wonderful food for thought!  

Keep it up.  I don&#039;t have the guts to do something like that.

Thanks again,

-D
PS - I think there&#039;s definite truth to Some women having trouble with reasoning. I want to omit &quot;some&quot; but I know that&#039;s sexist and just play epistemically proud.  From what I&#039;ve seen, women, even women who are good at math, have trouble reasoning about some of the most important things in life.  Women who aren&#039;t good at math only have trouble reasoning about math.  But now i&#039;m rambling.  Thanks again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting, but I think you&#8217;re only partially right.</p>
<p>Your wife (is that you who wrote this? Sorry, first time here&#8230;) obviously likes the attention your giving her.  Once or twice in there (I didn&#8217;t finish the entire video &#8212; stopped when you started explaining the methodology&#8230;) you could almost see her just beginning to smile&#8230;I think they call those micro-expressions.  And yes, I&#8217;m proud of that word, it&#8217;s the first time I&#8217;ve used it in written dialogue.</p>
<p>My point is that, I think you&#8217;re right that your wife (?) is using solipsistic reasoning, but I also think that she&#8217;s using it because she likes the attention AND you give it to her.  I actually think that when she comments on it being less than an hour, it&#8217;s a ruse to get you involved because she knows she&#8217;s getting closer to the answer&#8230;.</p>
<p>To be honest, it kind of reminds me of my 8-year niece whom I saw yesterday for the first time in a long, long, long time.  (Long story behind that one&#8230;)  She was beginning to tell stories about herself that bordered on lies.  One might say that were childish embellishments. The concern of course is that she&#8217;s developign some sort of lying disorder, which is probably not the case.  She probably likes the attention.  She made silly faces, talked about poop, and anything else to get the attention.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll probably disagree.  Oh well, I&#8217;m used to be wrong.</p>
<p>Thanks for the awesome post!  Wonderful food for thought!  </p>
<p>Keep it up.  I don&#8217;t have the guts to do something like that.</p>
<p>Thanks again,</p>
<p>-D<br />
PS &#8211; I think there&#8217;s definite truth to Some women having trouble with reasoning. I want to omit &#8220;some&#8221; but I know that&#8217;s sexist and just play epistemically proud.  From what I&#8217;ve seen, women, even women who are good at math, have trouble reasoning about some of the most important things in life.  Women who aren&#8217;t good at math only have trouble reasoning about math.  But now i&#8217;m rambling.  Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Johnson</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/22/solipsistic-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-4073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 02:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1082#comment-4073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, maybe it won&#039;t send you to hell, but it does make you look like an idiot. And it&#039;s pretty amusing when someone who&#039;s deriding other people for stupidity can&#039;t spell simple English correctly. 

It&#039;s really not that hard to tell the difference between, say, &quot;it&#039;s&quot; and &quot;its&quot; or &quot;who&#039;s&quot; and &quot;whose&quot;. Figure it out before you make fun of other people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, maybe it won&#8217;t send you to hell, but it does make you look like an idiot. And it&#8217;s pretty amusing when someone who&#8217;s deriding other people for stupidity can&#8217;t spell simple English correctly. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s really not that hard to tell the difference between, say, &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; and &#8220;its&#8221; or &#8220;who&#8217;s&#8221; and &#8220;whose&#8221;. Figure it out before you make fun of other people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepcov3r</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/22/solipsistic-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-4066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deepcov3r]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1082#comment-4066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not as bad as those other people who are REALLY dumb and can&#039;t explain MPH, right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not as bad as those other people who are REALLY dumb and can&#8217;t explain MPH, right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepcov3r</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/22/solipsistic-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-4065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deepcov3r]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1082#comment-4065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;When you’re girl is arguing w/ u doean’t it ever seem like it is a sign that SHE GIVES A SHIT?&quot;

Well, she maybe gives a shit about  getting you to do what SHE wants rather than what YOU want. But in a good relationship, the girl will try to find out what YOU BOTH want. 

Otherwise, she&#039;s just a bully, and you&#039;re an insecure, dependent fool for tolerating her bullying when all you have to do is physically leave (including cutting off all communication) and GFTOW.  

Don&#039;t mind me, just a therapist with ten years experience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When you’re girl is arguing w/ u doean’t it ever seem like it is a sign that SHE GIVES A SHIT?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, she maybe gives a shit about  getting you to do what SHE wants rather than what YOU want. But in a good relationship, the girl will try to find out what YOU BOTH want. </p>
<p>Otherwise, she&#8217;s just a bully, and you&#8217;re an insecure, dependent fool for tolerating her bullying when all you have to do is physically leave (including cutting off all communication) and GFTOW.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t mind me, just a therapist with ten years experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/22/solipsistic-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-4059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 03:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1082#comment-4059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I appreciate the reply. I completely understand the game POV you gave me and there MUST be times when it&#039;s necessary, but I invite you to check out the link I posted. When you&#039;re girl is arguing w/ u doean&#039;t it ever seem like it is a sign that SHE GIVES A SHIT? You&#039;re renogotiating the terms of the relationship and if you want to take he thing to the next level you had better show you&#039;re invested enough to get pissed?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the reply. I completely understand the game POV you gave me and there MUST be times when it&#8217;s necessary, but I invite you to check out the link I posted. When you&#8217;re girl is arguing w/ u doean&#8217;t it ever seem like it is a sign that SHE GIVES A SHIT? You&#8217;re renogotiating the terms of the relationship and if you want to take he thing to the next level you had better show you&#8217;re invested enough to get pissed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: driveallnight</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/03/22/solipsistic-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-4058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[driveallnight]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 03:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=1082#comment-4058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No brains = no headaches. Saves you from spending money on aspirin.

Some dude&#039;ll marry and take care of her.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No brains = no headaches. Saves you from spending money on aspirin.</p>
<p>Some dude&#8217;ll marry and take care of her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
