Comments on: The Contextual Alpha

By: All In «

All In « — Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:56:24 +0000

[…] tale of when youthful beta idealism, an almost self-affirming obliviousness of the SMP, and a Contextual Alpha status run headlong into the realities of our contemporary sexual marketplace and the brave new […]

By: Pushing Forwards Back «

Pushing Forwards Back « — Wed, 08 Aug 2012 15:05:15 +0000

[…] Rob Pattinson experiencing his WTF? moment. While he’s ostensibly a good looking guy and a Contextual Alpha, the lesson to be learned here is one which may confuse red-pill noobs. Why the fuck would Stewart […]

By: Leilani Massa

Leilani Massa — Sun, 06 May 2012 20:27:04 +0000

New petition to get Outdoor Channel to cancel Ted Nugent’s Spirit of the Wild. They’re being irresponsible by promoting illegal hunting by paying Ted Nugent to poach animals on national tv.

http://www.change.org/petitions/outdoor-channel-ted-nugent-s-poaching-is-not-entertainment

By: Scott

Scott — Sat, 07 Apr 2012 20:15:06 +0000

As most probably know by now this is over with. He wasn’t a celebrity so the media hammered him, the police got him for a so-called ’98 incident, and the 18 y/o (with only a 23 year difference in age) said they are done.
To use the daughter logic of reasoning; If I had a daughter I probably would rather have her with an older guy if he treated her well and took care of her, rather than to be a prostitute, but probably closer in age is better.
Last week a celebrity got engaged to a female (with only a 26 year difference). Many men would date and/or marry younger women if they dared/could.
I still believe it’s better to keep personal relationships out of the mainstream media (sites with millions of viewers and tv).

By: Wald

Wald — Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:47:44 +0000

I enjoyed this post because it illustrates something about game which I many men don’t understand – game is relative, not absolute.

Any man can be alpha in one situation and beta in the next.

Game is relative and so is Alpha.

By: Ashur

Ashur — Fri, 09 Mar 2012 21:39:16 +0000

Tali-

Your attempt at amused mastery has hit the scale somewhere between omega male passive-aggression and conversationally-unprepared reactionary.

Please try again.

Hint: The emoticon was a step too far. See also : try-hard.

By: Rollo Tomassi

Rollo Tomassi — Wed, 07 Mar 2012 14:56:01 +0000

Rollo, you can’t trust what that man said to the media to make himself look better, while everyone was out to get him with their pitchforks.

I’d agree with you if not for the fact that Hooker was married with children (one of them 17) for years before he ‘went rogue’ by investing 4 years into creating his perfect soul-mate. Just read his words about his new GF, listen to his mannerism in the interviews, the guy’s a self-convinced White Knight.

If you do the math, Hooker’s oldest kid was born when he was 24, meaning he was probably 22 or 23 when he got married. My guess is, even then, he was a self-convinced white knight who “did the right thing” when he first got married. Regardless, he most certainly never had the sexual experience in his 20’s and 30’s to mature beyond the adolescent social skill set he had when he was first married. Ergo, a just post-pubescent teenage girl makes for the perfect ‘sarge’ for him since he doesn’t possess the skills necessary to relate with women any older.

This isn’t a Charlie Sheen meltdown where the guy says “fuck it, I’m done with playing by society’s rules” and bangs pornstars half his age. Hooker genuinely thinks he’s going to “settle down” with his virgin soul-mate for the happily ever after.

By: Scott

Scott — Wed, 07 Mar 2012 05:56:46 +0000

For a year I’ve thought that if some guys want to get married, then this day and age they probably have to be “minor league talent scouts” and check out high school girls to find younger girls to marry (not because of the age of the girls, but in the sense of finding a prospect for the “major leagues” of marriage before most of them go of to college and lose their femininity and get caught up in their careers and in a few years hit the wall). Until yesterday I didn’t know he was already married, so he will be going through a huge divorce that will make him lose at least half of his worth and look bad to his new sweet-heart. Then, if he does marry this girl (they’re both of legal age so why is there all this tv attention?) and she goes to college (maybe he will pay for her “education”) she might then meet another guy, or eventually (including building up years of resentment from all this current negative publicity) this “sweet” girl might turn on him and “female con” him in a divorce. With a bitchy woman at least it’s clear up front how she is, but beware of the innocent sweet girls, just wait until she unexpectedly kicks him in the balls. After these possible 2 divorces he will learn about the “soulmate myth (that believing this shows he probably is a beta anyway)” and he may wish he never got married twice, or discover he could have just got a foreign young girl a green-card because he’s going to be taken to the cleaners regardless. Maybe next year he will have a book and movie deal. So, another beta trait is that it’s not like this young fling is all for no charge, so this is financially going to cost him a lot. Love/affection/romance/family costs much more than just sex, and that’s why I am content with just loving myself/pets (surprisingly there’s a lot of romance and relaxation watching fish and walking a dog)/work/exercise/fun, so I do not need or want “love”/affection from a woman plus not having a full-time woman it’s not expensive.
The “manosphere” is currently all over the place and is getting more scattered, and there is no unity, it started out under the radar with guys trying to figure out how to get laid, now it’s a bunch of a lot of things.
With the economy getting worse (except for the corrupt “elite few”) one of the next trends might be “Homeless Game” and people on welfare will be considered Alpha.