<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Disposables</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therationalmale.com/2012/01/27/the-disposables/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/01/27/the-disposables/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 21:14:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Apple Tree &#124; Sir Alan&#039;s Spire</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/01/27/the-disposables/comment-page-1/#comment-15156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Apple Tree &#124; Sir Alan&#039;s Spire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 05:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=842#comment-15156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Tree in effect reinforces solipsism, is another false projection about how men are incompetent and disposable, and justifies jealousy towards women who receive a lot of male attention because those women [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Tree in effect reinforces solipsism, is another false projection about how men are incompetent and disposable, and justifies jealousy towards women who receive a lot of male attention because those women [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Year One &#171;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/01/27/the-disposables/comment-page-1/#comment-9238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Year One &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=842#comment-9238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Disposables [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Disposables [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. C</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/01/27/the-disposables/comment-page-1/#comment-2824</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=842#comment-2824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To paraphrase Howard Bloom in his book, The Lucifer principle: a scientific expedition into the forces of history.

&quot;Men were designed to live short nasty brutal lives. Women were designed to live long miserable ones.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To paraphrase Howard Bloom in his book, The Lucifer principle: a scientific expedition into the forces of history.</p>
<p>&#8220;Men were designed to live short nasty brutal lives. Women were designed to live long miserable ones.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/01/27/the-disposables/comment-page-1/#comment-2799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=842#comment-2799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some religions talk tough, but really they are beta/weak, and they are their attempt to get/keep women all in the guise of religion. It is said that many women if they had to choose between a warrior or a celebrity would choose the famous (popular social proof)/rich (mega money) celebrity, probably because the wealthy celebrity raises her status as also being somebody special because he is with her plus with more money he can buy her more stuff. Maybe for a better chance at world peace, just tell those males instead of blowing themselves up and only maybe getting in the 70 range, that if they become a celebrity (rock star, actor, pop singer) they can get over 100 real women on earth now. Becoming a celebrity sounds like a better deal for those males.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some religions talk tough, but really they are beta/weak, and they are their attempt to get/keep women all in the guise of religion. It is said that many women if they had to choose between a warrior or a celebrity would choose the famous (popular social proof)/rich (mega money) celebrity, probably because the wealthy celebrity raises her status as also being somebody special because he is with her plus with more money he can buy her more stuff. Maybe for a better chance at world peace, just tell those males instead of blowing themselves up and only maybe getting in the 70 range, that if they become a celebrity (rock star, actor, pop singer) they can get over 100 real women on earth now. Becoming a celebrity sounds like a better deal for those males.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xsplat</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/01/27/the-disposables/comment-page-1/#comment-2772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xsplat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=842#comment-2772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps the metaphor puts it a little strongly.  What metaphor would you use to convey that sex and companionship is a base need built into most humans?  Because there is a word called &quot;loneliness&quot;, I know I&#039;m not the only person who feels this psychological requirement for intimacy.  

Most humans are wired, through millions of years of evolution, to feel uncomfortable when not in a position to mate, and to feel satisfied when in such a position.

It&#039;s not a philosophical issue of whether we can be satisfied alone and whether we need sex or not.  We simply have those feelings, and nothing other than sex and intimacy makes us feel better.  And nothing in the world - no drug, no other experience - feels as good on a consistent moment to moment day by day basis as that initial flush of being romantically involved.

Therefore I propose that serial or parallel monogamy, with changing up the girls from every 6 months to two years is the path that will lead to maximizing happiness and well-being and life satisfaction for those of us who are not strongly family and child oriented.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the metaphor puts it a little strongly.  What metaphor would you use to convey that sex and companionship is a base need built into most humans?  Because there is a word called &#8220;loneliness&#8221;, I know I&#8217;m not the only person who feels this psychological requirement for intimacy.  </p>
<p>Most humans are wired, through millions of years of evolution, to feel uncomfortable when not in a position to mate, and to feel satisfied when in such a position.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a philosophical issue of whether we can be satisfied alone and whether we need sex or not.  We simply have those feelings, and nothing other than sex and intimacy makes us feel better.  And nothing in the world &#8211; no drug, no other experience &#8211; feels as good on a consistent moment to moment day by day basis as that initial flush of being romantically involved.</p>
<p>Therefore I propose that serial or parallel monogamy, with changing up the girls from every 6 months to two years is the path that will lead to maximizing happiness and well-being and life satisfaction for those of us who are not strongly family and child oriented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traveller</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/01/27/the-disposables/comment-page-1/#comment-2771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Traveller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=842#comment-2771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[xsplat: congratulations for your path. I did something similar while I never knew anyone claiming to become able to fly.

Sex like food? Nah, how many times we heard that? Without food we die. And without sex? If it were true, a lot of betas would be dead right now and the population would be very smaller.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>xsplat: congratulations for your path. I did something similar while I never knew anyone claiming to become able to fly.</p>
<p>Sex like food? Nah, how many times we heard that? Without food we die. And without sex? If it were true, a lot of betas would be dead right now and the population would be very smaller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traveller</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/01/27/the-disposables/comment-page-1/#comment-2770</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Traveller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=842#comment-2770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What you are describing here are some sort of domestic pets. I agree, women are like domestic pets, but pets are more able to be faithful when in bad times - they perceive the love.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you are describing here are some sort of domestic pets. I agree, women are like domestic pets, but pets are more able to be faithful when in bad times &#8211; they perceive the love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loliath</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2012/01/27/the-disposables/comment-page-1/#comment-2767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loliath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=842#comment-2767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not long ago, I woke up with an understanding that&#039;s probably mainstream now (even outside the manosphere) but once internalized, it has dramatically changed my perception of reality.

It&#039;s simple - women live in the present, men live in the future.

If a woman sees a possibility to make the present moment more enjoyable, she would do that in a heartbeat no matter what the future consequences are.

She would return the cake she ordered at the coffee shop three times if it&#039;s not absolutely to her liking, with just the right amount of chocolate sauce and sprinkled cocoa.
She would turn the heating up by just 1 degree if she&#039;s just a tiny 
bit cold.
If you do something that she doesn&#039;t like then fuck you! she&#039;s pissed! crying and screaming. you&#039;ve ruined her perfect moment!
If that other guy is into her and no one&#039;s around - she&#039;ll fuck him! then come back home and cook dinner like nothing happened.

Men, on the other hand, will suffer in the present if they believe that it will be worth it in the future. We will work hard, eat cup ramen in college and earn money in order to attain financial security. 
We can eat every day the exact same meal and get used to that and move on.

Women will never have the mental constructs necessary to just view men&#039;s suffering and sacrifice as beneficial at the current moment. they cannot see how the present sacrifice extends into the future.

However, when a women realizes that her current happiness is derived from a man&#039;s past effort, it is very different to her - they call it &quot;romantic&quot;.
At that present moment when she realizes this, the man is genuinely appreciated by her. 

As that moment passes and becomes past, so does her appreciation.

Those bastard-not-even-hell-would-suffice-for marriage counselors have this mantra that they spout at couples - &quot;marriage is constant effort&quot;
Wrong you bastards! marriage is MEN&#039;s EXCLUSIVE constant effort!


It is very easy to label women that do this (read - all women) as the whiny bitches that they are. However, this is the reality we live. 

It is in our hands now to decide how much we&#039;re willing to put up with in order to get sex/love/whatever and realize that we will never be able to achieve that fairytale true lasting love without putting an irrational amount of effort into it. and even then, it may not be enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not long ago, I woke up with an understanding that&#8217;s probably mainstream now (even outside the manosphere) but once internalized, it has dramatically changed my perception of reality.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s simple &#8211; women live in the present, men live in the future.</p>
<p>If a woman sees a possibility to make the present moment more enjoyable, she would do that in a heartbeat no matter what the future consequences are.</p>
<p>She would return the cake she ordered at the coffee shop three times if it&#8217;s not absolutely to her liking, with just the right amount of chocolate sauce and sprinkled cocoa.<br />
She would turn the heating up by just 1 degree if she&#8217;s just a tiny<br />
bit cold.<br />
If you do something that she doesn&#8217;t like then fuck you! she&#8217;s pissed! crying and screaming. you&#8217;ve ruined her perfect moment!<br />
If that other guy is into her and no one&#8217;s around &#8211; she&#8217;ll fuck him! then come back home and cook dinner like nothing happened.</p>
<p>Men, on the other hand, will suffer in the present if they believe that it will be worth it in the future. We will work hard, eat cup ramen in college and earn money in order to attain financial security.<br />
We can eat every day the exact same meal and get used to that and move on.</p>
<p>Women will never have the mental constructs necessary to just view men&#8217;s suffering and sacrifice as beneficial at the current moment. they cannot see how the present sacrifice extends into the future.</p>
<p>However, when a women realizes that her current happiness is derived from a man&#8217;s past effort, it is very different to her &#8211; they call it &#8220;romantic&#8221;.<br />
At that present moment when she realizes this, the man is genuinely appreciated by her. </p>
<p>As that moment passes and becomes past, so does her appreciation.</p>
<p>Those bastard-not-even-hell-would-suffice-for marriage counselors have this mantra that they spout at couples &#8211; &#8220;marriage is constant effort&#8221;<br />
Wrong you bastards! marriage is MEN&#8217;s EXCLUSIVE constant effort!</p>
<p>It is very easy to label women that do this (read &#8211; all women) as the whiny bitches that they are. However, this is the reality we live. </p>
<p>It is in our hands now to decide how much we&#8217;re willing to put up with in order to get sex/love/whatever and realize that we will never be able to achieve that fairytale true lasting love without putting an irrational amount of effort into it. and even then, it may not be enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
