Comments on: Humanism, Behaviorism and the Amorality of Game

By: 20 Questions |

20 Questions | — Thu, 14 Aug 2014 04:19:23 +0000

[…] compensating for the other’s weaknesses. It’s this overreaching social impetus (idealistic humanism and feminine social primacy) that encourages us to believe we are independent, autonomous and […]

By: DeNihilist

DeNihilist — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:38:07 +0000

And the drive was given free reign by our male “betters” who decided that if woman did not have to worry about getting pregnant, then there would be pussy for everyone. Unfortunately, with the reign being freed, woman could now chase Mr Perfect til the day they died.

Sadly, another case on unintended consequences……

By: Rollo Tomassi

Rollo Tomassi — Thu, 27 Mar 2014 18:30:59 +0000

Bear in mind that the hypregamic want for ‘Mr. Perfect’, legitimate or not, and the perceived improvement to her conditions that he represents still makes pragmatic sense.

It’s not about legitimacy, it’s about the drive.

By: DeNihilist

DeNihilist — Thu, 27 Mar 2014 18:21:47 +0000

” It may be morally reprehensible for a woman to break her marriage commitment, divorce her husband and remarry a rich entrepreneur, but from a behavioral perspective it makes long term pragmatic sense.”

Only problem with this line Rollo, is that it seems most woman divorce their mates, not for a true higher status male, but for another whom at the moment, fits their still recurring teenage fantasy of Mr. Perfect.

Know a couple of women who have split with their mates, to join “Mr. Perfect” only to either be begging to come back, or living alone with their cats 2 years later. Really fucking sad!

If your line was true, I believe that there would be less anger on these forums from the discarded males, as most men have an innate desire to follow the better male. But when they loose their wife/life to a dickwad, and can’t waken their wives from the fantasy, they feel enraged.

By: Superman

Superman — Sun, 04 Dec 2011 03:05:52 +0000

It’s always great to see other rational bloggers out there. I dig it! Morals are a private personal matter that each man should determine by himself, as long as he does not use force.

By: mailmail.com

mailmail.com — Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:39:28 +0000

Dont know about the Dalai Lama but as for Gandhi: http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2521/did-mahatma-gandhi-sleep-with-virgins

By: Justin

Justin — Wed, 30 Nov 2011 05:04:05 +0000

What about Ghandi or the Dalai Lama?

Do they get pussy?

By: Dan

Dan — Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:25:52 +0000

Awesome post. But in this one aspect rationality doesnt guide mans behaviors and instead most hold fast to to some fuckedup morality (myself on some level included). I dont know if its fear for society or something higher that stops us from being selfish but i think its simply the fear thing in some way or another, what do you think?