<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Pheromonal Beta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/17/the-pheromonal-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/17/the-pheromonal-beta/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 22:58:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/17/the-pheromonal-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-65121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2014 11:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=477#comment-65121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The overall logic of this article is spot-on, however it would have done a little bit more justice to have reinforced it with the all-too-prevalent example of when men are hooking up with / in bed with a girl, but purposely don&#039;t push for sex because they don&#039;t want the girl to think they&#039;re a &quot;player,&quot; when in actuality not pushing for sex has the opposite effect and the girl loses interest because of it.  In other words, the girl saying no always needs to be the limiting factor, never the man not trying; in other words, a man should always push as far as he can until he gets a firm no.  I&#039;ve learned that mistake enough times in the past, having forfeited quite a few amazing sexual opportunities because I didn&#039;t want to come off as a player, whereas now I realize I could have easily had those ones in the bag. In terms of validation, who cares, but it&#039;s annoying that &quot;beta-game,&quot; both as you describe in this article and as I talk about, are the exact OPPOSITE of what women want.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The overall logic of this article is spot-on, however it would have done a little bit more justice to have reinforced it with the all-too-prevalent example of when men are hooking up with / in bed with a girl, but purposely don&#8217;t push for sex because they don&#8217;t want the girl to think they&#8217;re a &#8220;player,&#8221; when in actuality not pushing for sex has the opposite effect and the girl loses interest because of it.  In other words, the girl saying no always needs to be the limiting factor, never the man not trying; in other words, a man should always push as far as he can until he gets a firm no.  I&#8217;ve learned that mistake enough times in the past, having forfeited quite a few amazing sexual opportunities because I didn&#8217;t want to come off as a player, whereas now I realize I could have easily had those ones in the bag. In terms of validation, who cares, but it&#8217;s annoying that &#8220;beta-game,&#8221; both as you describe in this article and as I talk about, are the exact OPPOSITE of what women want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/17/the-pheromonal-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-65120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2014 10:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=477#comment-65120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You mean prolactin, not oxytocin.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean prolactin, not oxytocin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oxymoron1983</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/17/the-pheromonal-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-53231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[oxymoron1983]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 19:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=477#comment-53231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Rollo
does masturbation without ejaculation make a man Pheromonal Beta?
what is biological difference between ejaculation with sex and ejaculation with masturbation?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rollo<br />
does masturbation without ejaculation make a man Pheromonal Beta?<br />
what is biological difference between ejaculation with sex and ejaculation with masturbation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/17/the-pheromonal-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-40881</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 03:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=477#comment-40881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know you are not a big fan of Jung, but those pheromones did lead to some &quot;synchronization&#039; !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know you are not a big fan of Jung, but those pheromones did lead to some &#8220;synchronization&#8217; !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/17/the-pheromonal-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-40880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 03:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=477#comment-40880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rollo,

I am taking an ecology course and yesterday our professor referenced this study:

Stern, K., &amp; McClintock, M. K. (1998). Regulation of ovulation by human pheromones. Nature, 392(6672), 177.

Abstract

Pheromones are airborne chemical signals that are released by an individual into the environment and which affect the physiology or behaviour of other members of the same species. The idea that humans produce pheromones has excited the imagination of scientists and the public, leading to widespread claims for their existence, which, however, has remained unproven. Here we investigate whether humans produce compounds that regulate a specific neuroendocrine mechanism in other people without being consciously detected as odours (thereby fulfilling the classic definition of a pheromone). We found that odourless compounds from the armpits of women in the late follicular phase of their menstrual cycles accelerated the preovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone of recipient women and shortened their menstrual cycles. Axillary (underarm) compounds from the same donors which were collected later in the menstrual cycle (at ovulation) had the opposite effect: they delayed the luteinizing-hormone surge of the recipients and lengthened their menstrual cycles. By showing in a fully controlled experiment that the timing of ovulation can be manipulated, this study provides definitive evidence of human pheromones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rollo,</p>
<p>I am taking an ecology course and yesterday our professor referenced this study:</p>
<p>Stern, K., &amp; McClintock, M. K. (1998). Regulation of ovulation by human pheromones. Nature, 392(6672), 177.</p>
<p>Abstract</p>
<p>Pheromones are airborne chemical signals that are released by an individual into the environment and which affect the physiology or behaviour of other members of the same species. The idea that humans produce pheromones has excited the imagination of scientists and the public, leading to widespread claims for their existence, which, however, has remained unproven. Here we investigate whether humans produce compounds that regulate a specific neuroendocrine mechanism in other people without being consciously detected as odours (thereby fulfilling the classic definition of a pheromone). We found that odourless compounds from the armpits of women in the late follicular phase of their menstrual cycles accelerated the preovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone of recipient women and shortened their menstrual cycles. Axillary (underarm) compounds from the same donors which were collected later in the menstrual cycle (at ovulation) had the opposite effect: they delayed the luteinizing-hormone surge of the recipients and lengthened their menstrual cycles. By showing in a fully controlled experiment that the timing of ovulation can be manipulated, this study provides definitive evidence of human pheromones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rollo Tomassi</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/17/the-pheromonal-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-24492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rollo Tomassi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 20:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=477#comment-24492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More corroboration http://tinyurl.com/mmumwgk  of the Pheromonal Beta theory http://tinyurl.com/mzfl9zt]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More corroboration <a href="http://tinyurl.com/mmumwgk" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/mmumwgk</a>  of the Pheromonal Beta theory <a href="http://tinyurl.com/mzfl9zt" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/mzfl9zt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtyu</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/17/the-pheromonal-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-12315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rtyu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=477#comment-12315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are no proven scientific study that would say - porn is bad. Stop believing crap guys be smart its 21st Century]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no proven scientific study that would say &#8211; porn is bad. Stop believing crap guys be smart its 21st Century</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CL</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/17/the-pheromonal-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-10213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=477#comment-10213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ironic that the beta game guy&#039;s name is Dom...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironic that the beta game guy&#8217;s name is Dom&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
