<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sorry,..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/16/sorry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/16/sorry/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 22:18:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/16/sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-83214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=469#comment-83214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another awesome post.  Good lord this blog is awesome.  I&#039;m going to sit this weekend and read every post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another awesome post.  Good lord this blog is awesome.  I&#8217;m going to sit this weekend and read every post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaelrolls</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/16/sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-43217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michaelrolls]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 17:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=469#comment-43217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also... Replace self-deprecating humour with self-aggrandising humour.  &#039;Cause that&#039;s what they mean when they say they like a sense of humour.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also&#8230; Replace self-deprecating humour with self-aggrandising humour.  &#8216;Cause that&#8217;s what they mean when they say they like a sense of humour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VD</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/16/sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-43215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 17:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=469#comment-43215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;Check out a Tom Brady or Peyton Manning postgame interview after a loss for how to assume responsibility for fault without lowering one’s value.&lt;/b&gt;

Throw your offensive line under the bus?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Check out a Tom Brady or Peyton Manning postgame interview after a loss for how to assume responsibility for fault without lowering one’s value.</b></p>
<p>Throw your offensive line under the bus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rollo Tomassi</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/16/sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-39573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rollo Tomassi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 03:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=469#comment-39573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re welcome.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcllcd</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/16/sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-39572</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dcllcd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 03:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=469#comment-39572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[women despise the obligation of sympathy.

When I read that my memory instantly took me to a time when I had done that exact thing. Damnit Rollo. When reading wonderfully articulated posts like this one they almost always have the same effect, a punch to the face of my beta-programming. A punch that is necessary.
Thanks for sharing this. -dcl]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>women despise the obligation of sympathy.</p>
<p>When I read that my memory instantly took me to a time when I had done that exact thing. Damnit Rollo. When reading wonderfully articulated posts like this one they almost always have the same effect, a punch to the face of my beta-programming. A punch that is necessary.<br />
Thanks for sharing this. -dcl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: titanic</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/16/sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-33580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[titanic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 03:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=469#comment-33580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out a Tom Brady or Peyton Manning postgame interview after a loss for how to assume responsibility for fault without lowering one&#039;s value.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out a Tom Brady or Peyton Manning postgame interview after a loss for how to assume responsibility for fault without lowering one&#8217;s value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Financial Frame &#124; The Reinvention of Man</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/16/sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-27498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Financial Frame &#124; The Reinvention of Man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2013 04:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=469#comment-27498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] a decision needed to be made, I would make regardless of how much she bitched about it, and I would never apologize for leading my household.  She did not like this and even if I was to pay for her horses the same [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a decision needed to be made, I would make regardless of how much she bitched about it, and I would never apologize for leading my household.  She did not like this and even if I was to pay for her horses the same [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuenaVista</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/16/sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-24026</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BuenaVista]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=469#comment-24026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sustaining &#039;prize mentality&#039; is a challenge, as I meet very, very few women who do not consider themselves the prize, and the man a competitor to win the prize.  This is all popular culture teaches them, from Disney to Notting Hill, to any of the written romances.  I find women are actually befuddled, speechless and brain-locked if I mention, &quot;Hey, there are two prizes if there is any prize here, to be won.&quot;  

Now, confronted with a man who asserts his status as a prize, the women navigate a narrow divide: on the one hand, they needn&#039;t work to secure the attentions of most men; on the other, they are attracted to a man who won&#039;t supplicate.  In the end, though, I think most default to habit and culture, and choose the supplicant: it&#039;s less work, emotionally, intellectually, and materially.  And in this way they wind up with a drafthorse greater-beta type, which affords her an easier lifestyle.

In trying to understand a woman&#039;s long-term value, I would say her respect for a man&#039;s &#039;prize&#039; nature is as important as her demonstrated virtue.  When I backtest a model of female qualities on my more significant relationships, its the presence of virtue and a woman&#039;s ability to earn a man&#039;s affection and trust that are quite rare.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sustaining &#8216;prize mentality&#8217; is a challenge, as I meet very, very few women who do not consider themselves the prize, and the man a competitor to win the prize.  This is all popular culture teaches them, from Disney to Notting Hill, to any of the written romances.  I find women are actually befuddled, speechless and brain-locked if I mention, &#8220;Hey, there are two prizes if there is any prize here, to be won.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Now, confronted with a man who asserts his status as a prize, the women navigate a narrow divide: on the one hand, they needn&#8217;t work to secure the attentions of most men; on the other, they are attracted to a man who won&#8217;t supplicate.  In the end, though, I think most default to habit and culture, and choose the supplicant: it&#8217;s less work, emotionally, intellectually, and materially.  And in this way they wind up with a drafthorse greater-beta type, which affords her an easier lifestyle.</p>
<p>In trying to understand a woman&#8217;s long-term value, I would say her respect for a man&#8217;s &#8216;prize&#8217; nature is as important as her demonstrated virtue.  When I backtest a model of female qualities on my more significant relationships, its the presence of virtue and a woman&#8217;s ability to earn a man&#8217;s affection and trust that are quite rare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
