<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Duplicity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/29/duplicity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/29/duplicity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 22:50:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topping from the Bottom &#124;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/29/duplicity/comment-page-1/#comment-87459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Topping from the Bottom &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=210#comment-87459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] messaging that&#8217;s been pounded into our collective consciousness for the better part of 2014. Feminine duplicity will be on display and women will either say it&#8217;s their due, it&#8217;s &#8220;not for [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] messaging that&#8217;s been pounded into our collective consciousness for the better part of 2014. Feminine duplicity will be on display and women will either say it&#8217;s their due, it&#8217;s &#8220;not for [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Choreplay &#171;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/29/duplicity/comment-page-1/#comment-15672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choreplay &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=210#comment-15672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] be fooled into thinking that this is just another example of women&#8217;s fickle duplicity. A lot has happened socially in the five years between these articles; the End of Men, Kate Bolick, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] be fooled into thinking that this is just another example of women&#8217;s fickle duplicity. A lot has happened socially in the five years between these articles; the End of Men, Kate Bolick, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blueprint for an Alpha Widow &#171;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/29/duplicity/comment-page-1/#comment-8815</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blueprint for an Alpha Widow &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=210#comment-8815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to support their personal interpretations when the source agrees with that premise. The innate solipsism of women promotes a self-centric primary position as the beginning of forming a premise and then progresses [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to support their personal interpretations when the source agrees with that premise. The innate solipsism of women promotes a self-centric primary position as the beginning of forming a premise and then progresses [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thechauvinistkaiser</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/29/duplicity/comment-page-1/#comment-2094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thechauvinistkaiser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=210#comment-2094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And this is why I was always wrong when I argued with me ex girlfriend!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this is why I was always wrong when I argued with me ex girlfriend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Point, Counterpoint &#171;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/29/duplicity/comment-page-1/#comment-2071</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Point, Counterpoint &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 16:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=210#comment-2071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to support their personal interpretations when the source agrees with that premise. The innate solipsism of women promotes a self-centric primary position as the beginning of forming a premise and then progresses [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to support their personal interpretations when the source agrees with that premise. The innate solipsism of women promotes a self-centric primary position as the beginning of forming a premise and then progresses [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Protracted SMV &#171;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/29/duplicity/comment-page-1/#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Protracted SMV &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=210#comment-1757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] can fully understand why women would think men acknowledging this would be mean-spirited. Women&#8217;s innate solipsism predisposes them to thinking that viscerally identifying their SMV&#8217;s decay is an attack on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] can fully understand why women would think men acknowledging this would be mean-spirited. Women&#8217;s innate solipsism predisposes them to thinking that viscerally identifying their SMV&#8217;s decay is an attack on [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernst Hof</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/29/duplicity/comment-page-1/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ernst Hof]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=210#comment-652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My girlfriend went to a foam cannon party in Spain with two single friends. The single friends both have high morale though. Should I be worried? Ofcourse I am but I feel like there&#039;s nothing I can do other than speculate about what might have or not have happened.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My girlfriend went to a foam cannon party in Spain with two single friends. The single friends both have high morale though. Should I be worried? Ofcourse I am but I feel like there&#8217;s nothing I can do other than speculate about what might have or not have happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lily</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/29/duplicity/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 23:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=210#comment-492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I agree that on some base level they want to screw the alpha right then right there, but they require either a green light from social convention, or somekind of complete assurrance (or drunken belief) that their tryst won’t be discovered.&quot;
I think most women want the alpha provider, so it&#039;s likely that they want to ensure he&#039;s committed to them. 

Whether this is a biological thing that they ideally want to mate with the good genes and have provision from the same man or actually biologically they would rather have a different scenario (e.g. live in a tribe and have their father and/or other men in their family look after them and have a boyfriend/s) but are responding to the way society has been set up for a long time with 2 people in a monogamous relationship together and anything else being likely to be untenable*, I can&#039;t say.


*there are exceptions obviously, e.g. in upper class England once married as long as an heir already produced, a woman could often get away with having an affair.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I agree that on some base level they want to screw the alpha right then right there, but they require either a green light from social convention, or somekind of complete assurrance (or drunken belief) that their tryst won’t be discovered.&#8221;<br />
I think most women want the alpha provider, so it&#8217;s likely that they want to ensure he&#8217;s committed to them. </p>
<p>Whether this is a biological thing that they ideally want to mate with the good genes and have provision from the same man or actually biologically they would rather have a different scenario (e.g. live in a tribe and have their father and/or other men in their family look after them and have a boyfriend/s) but are responding to the way society has been set up for a long time with 2 people in a monogamous relationship together and anything else being likely to be untenable*, I can&#8217;t say.</p>
<p>*there are exceptions obviously, e.g. in upper class England once married as long as an heir already produced, a woman could often get away with having an affair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
