<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Difference of Purpose</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/19/difference-of-purpose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/19/difference-of-purpose/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 21:33:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.M.</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/19/difference-of-purpose/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J.M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 15:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The more things change, the idiots still the same&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The more things change, the idiots still the same&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/19/difference-of-purpose/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[a]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Calm down dude.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calm down dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xsplat</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/19/difference-of-purpose/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xsplat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 06:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I took a minute for a lazy google of women&#039;s comparative peripheral vision, and confirmed what you said. 

I was at the disco the other night, and wasn&#039;t sure if a girl who was giving me no eye contact was none the less giving me IOIs by dancing near me even as I moved about the club.  Did she notice how I&#039;d been observing her much of the night?

As a man I&#039;d need to look right at a persons face to know if they were looking at me.  I&#039;m guessing now that a girls peripheral vision can do that while being more discreet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a minute for a lazy google of women&#8217;s comparative peripheral vision, and confirmed what you said. </p>
<p>I was at the disco the other night, and wasn&#8217;t sure if a girl who was giving me no eye contact was none the less giving me IOIs by dancing near me even as I moved about the club.  Did she notice how I&#8217;d been observing her much of the night?</p>
<p>As a man I&#8217;d need to look right at a persons face to know if they were looking at me.  I&#8217;m guessing now that a girls peripheral vision can do that while being more discreet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlekNovy</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/19/difference-of-purpose/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AlekNovy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;one of the prime tenets of Game, which also happens to be one of the prime tenets of behavioral psychology:

Behavior is the only reliable proof of motivation or intent. Believe what a woman does, not what she says.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Which game? It&#039;s funny how each of you gamer folks likes to take credit for everything on planet earth. Everyone of you will say shit like &quot;x is a primary tenent of game&quot;. Ask 1000 gamers to compile a list of top 10 tenents of game, and you&#039;ll get a 1000 answers.

To me sounds just like a really elaborate mind-fuck placebo for one to not face inner-game issues.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Behavior is the only reliable proof of motivation or intent. Believe what a woman does, not what she says.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Contrary to gamer belief, most people in the real world have known this for thousands of years. When something like this has to be told to someone, it just makes the game-audience look bad...

&lt;em&gt;&quot;Wait, you just figured that out, that&#039;s news to you? People who &quot;study game&quot; need to be told that? What&#039;s next, take showers regularly?&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;What parts of a man’s body are reported by women to be the most attractive? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Reported where and by which women? Is this the ethereal vague &quot;them&quot;? I&#039;ve interviewed women for years, and they&#039;ve all been telling me about checking out biceps first.

Where is this conspiratorial &quot;them&quot; hiding? Can you show me a study that supposedly women are trying to trick you. Can you show me a study where women in general (and in which country?) claim that they only check out face and eyes?


&lt;blockquote&gt;The majority also report that they’re less attracted to “overly muscular men” yet if this experiment is accurate, it was this guy’s biceps that attracted the most attention for women&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Mmmm... Did you see what you did there &quot;Women report they don&#039;t like B, but they did a lot of A&quot;

Women report they don&#039;t like OVERLY muscular men. They didn&#039;t say they don&#039;t like muscle. The key word is OVERLY. And it is true and has been studied in several ways.

It is true that more muscular men have more sexual partners and ellicit more sexual excitement from women, but ONLY up to a CUTOFF POINT, above which it becomes a negative.

The adonis effect guys reference and summarize a lot of those studies. I have one around here where they found that the average guy over-estimates how much muscle is attractive by 20 pounds.

THERE&#039;S A SWEET SPOT. Women weren&#039;t saying &quot;we dislike muscle&quot;, they were saying &quot;I like a CERTAIN moderate amount of muscle&quot;. The guy in the video is by no means a pro-bodybuilder.

&lt;blockquote&gt; followed only by crotch gazing in frequency – another body part women would rarely admit to ‘checking out’ on a guy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Do you have ANY female friends? All my female friends and acquaintances have admitted this. What are you talking about? 

If you mean what women say in &quot;polite company&quot; or on national TV, that&#039;s obvious self-censoring due to politeness. But men wouldn&#039;t say &quot;I check out butts&quot; in those contexts EITHER. The guys ALSO say &quot;Oh, I notice a woman&#039;s eyes first&quot; in politically correct contexts too like being interviewed for a major mainstream magazine or a family program or whatever.

In private contexts, where men are honest about butt-gazing, women are honest about crotch gazing too.

I&#039;m sorry to ruin the conspiratorial &quot;us vs. them&quot; dynamique that the game cult is based on, but the conspiracy just isn&#039;t there. There is no hidden conspiracy by &quot;mainstream society&quot; to hide away &quot;the secret of attraction&quot; from you.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>one of the prime tenets of Game, which also happens to be one of the prime tenets of behavioral psychology:</p>
<p>Behavior is the only reliable proof of motivation or intent. Believe what a woman does, not what she says.</p></blockquote>
<p>Which game? It&#8217;s funny how each of you gamer folks likes to take credit for everything on planet earth. Everyone of you will say shit like &#8220;x is a primary tenent of game&#8221;. Ask 1000 gamers to compile a list of top 10 tenents of game, and you&#8217;ll get a 1000 answers.</p>
<p>To me sounds just like a really elaborate mind-fuck placebo for one to not face inner-game issues.</p>
<blockquote><p>Behavior is the only reliable proof of motivation or intent. Believe what a woman does, not what she says.</p></blockquote>
<p>Contrary to gamer belief, most people in the real world have known this for thousands of years. When something like this has to be told to someone, it just makes the game-audience look bad&#8230;</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Wait, you just figured that out, that&#8217;s news to you? People who &#8220;study game&#8221; need to be told that? What&#8217;s next, take showers regularly?&#8221;</em></p>
<blockquote><p>What parts of a man’s body are reported by women to be the most attractive? </p></blockquote>
<p>Reported where and by which women? Is this the ethereal vague &#8220;them&#8221;? I&#8217;ve interviewed women for years, and they&#8217;ve all been telling me about checking out biceps first.</p>
<p>Where is this conspiratorial &#8220;them&#8221; hiding? Can you show me a study that supposedly women are trying to trick you. Can you show me a study where women in general (and in which country?) claim that they only check out face and eyes?</p>
<blockquote><p>The majority also report that they’re less attracted to “overly muscular men” yet if this experiment is accurate, it was this guy’s biceps that attracted the most attention for women</p></blockquote>
<p>Mmmm&#8230; Did you see what you did there &#8220;Women report they don&#8217;t like B, but they did a lot of A&#8221;</p>
<p>Women report they don&#8217;t like OVERLY muscular men. They didn&#8217;t say they don&#8217;t like muscle. The key word is OVERLY. And it is true and has been studied in several ways.</p>
<p>It is true that more muscular men have more sexual partners and ellicit more sexual excitement from women, but ONLY up to a CUTOFF POINT, above which it becomes a negative.</p>
<p>The adonis effect guys reference and summarize a lot of those studies. I have one around here where they found that the average guy over-estimates how much muscle is attractive by 20 pounds.</p>
<p>THERE&#8217;S A SWEET SPOT. Women weren&#8217;t saying &#8220;we dislike muscle&#8221;, they were saying &#8220;I like a CERTAIN moderate amount of muscle&#8221;. The guy in the video is by no means a pro-bodybuilder.</p>
<blockquote><p> followed only by crotch gazing in frequency – another body part women would rarely admit to ‘checking out’ on a guy.</p></blockquote>
<p>Do you have ANY female friends? All my female friends and acquaintances have admitted this. What are you talking about? </p>
<p>If you mean what women say in &#8220;polite company&#8221; or on national TV, that&#8217;s obvious self-censoring due to politeness. But men wouldn&#8217;t say &#8220;I check out butts&#8221; in those contexts EITHER. The guys ALSO say &#8220;Oh, I notice a woman&#8217;s eyes first&#8221; in politically correct contexts too like being interviewed for a major mainstream magazine or a family program or whatever.</p>
<p>In private contexts, where men are honest about butt-gazing, women are honest about crotch gazing too.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry to ruin the conspiratorial &#8220;us vs. them&#8221; dynamique that the game cult is based on, but the conspiracy just isn&#8217;t there. There is no hidden conspiracy by &#8220;mainstream society&#8221; to hide away &#8220;the secret of attraction&#8221; from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samseau</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/19/difference-of-purpose/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[samseau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Girls instinctively look downward when they are attracted to a man.


So if they are standing up and facing a man who is taller than them, they will look downwards and be facing his biceps.

If they are sitting, their downward look will face his crotch. That&#039;s all there is to this video.


Also, there are plenty of times in this video where the girls look directly into his eyes, but they fail to highlight it. Lame video.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Girls instinctively look downward when they are attracted to a man.</p>
<p>So if they are standing up and facing a man who is taller than them, they will look downwards and be facing his biceps.</p>
<p>If they are sitting, their downward look will face his crotch. That&#8217;s all there is to this video.</p>
<p>Also, there are plenty of times in this video where the girls look directly into his eyes, but they fail to highlight it. Lame video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Fletcher</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/19/difference-of-purpose/comment-page-1/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Fletcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.columbia.edu/itc/anthropology/v1007/jakabovics/mf2.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.columbia.edu/itc/anthropology/v1007/jakabovics/mf2.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.columbia.edu/itc/anthropology/v1007/jakabovics/mf2.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jzEllis</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/19/difference-of-purpose/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jzEllis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 04:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t buy the women have better &quot;peripheral vision&quot; bit. I think generally, men just don&#039;t care. I know I don&#039;t. if u have a nice ass I&#039;m gonna look. if u didn&#039;t want me to notice don&#039;t show it off.

that said, I catch women crotch gazing at me as well as checking out my pecks all the time. although I agree most men normally aren&#039;t as observant about such things with regards to women.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t buy the women have better &#8220;peripheral vision&#8221; bit. I think generally, men just don&#8217;t care. I know I don&#8217;t. if u have a nice ass I&#8217;m gonna look. if u didn&#8217;t want me to notice don&#8217;t show it off.</p>
<p>that said, I catch women crotch gazing at me as well as checking out my pecks all the time. although I agree most men normally aren&#8217;t as observant about such things with regards to women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat Patrol</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/19/difference-of-purpose/comment-page-1/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cat Patrol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guys will look for a few seconds and forget it. 
Women take a half second glance, memorize it, then fantasize about it that night.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys will look for a few seconds and forget it.<br />
Women take a half second glance, memorize it, then fantasize about it that night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
