<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women&#8217;s Physical Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/15/womens-physical-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/15/womens-physical-standards/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 22:38:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kobayashii1681</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/15/womens-physical-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-89659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kobayashii1681]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=123#comment-89659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;By historical comparison, women’ve got it easy when it comes to physicality&quot;. - &quot;stop your bitching&quot;

End...of!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;By historical comparison, women’ve got it easy when it comes to physicality&#8221;. &#8211; &#8220;stop your bitching&#8221;</p>
<p>End&#8230;of!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chandra</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/15/womens-physical-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-73127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chandra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=123#comment-73127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i wouldnt go as far as im a full on chubby chaser as as i have my limits for size but i could care less about broad shoulders or v shape and i absolutely hate muscles. they gross me out.. i actually have been fattening up my boyfriend for the last six years weve been together. you cant cuddle a skinny muscled guy first of all its just uncomfortable and i like having stuff to grab on to and when a guys got some chunk going on hes like a personal heater :) i think that whoever wrote this didnt take into account that women are just as wide ranged as men are in tastes. the majority of women out there may like a muscle clad man whose in top shape just as much as the majority of men out there want model figured women but theres people on both sides of that wall who dont fall in with the majority. maybe you should do some research past just sub cultures of porn cause if you havent noticed there really isnt porn for women so whose to say what kind of men youd see if there was!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wouldnt go as far as im a full on chubby chaser as as i have my limits for size but i could care less about broad shoulders or v shape and i absolutely hate muscles. they gross me out.. i actually have been fattening up my boyfriend for the last six years weve been together. you cant cuddle a skinny muscled guy first of all its just uncomfortable and i like having stuff to grab on to and when a guys got some chunk going on hes like a personal heater <span class='wp-smiley wp-emoji wp-emoji-smile' title=':)'>:)</span> i think that whoever wrote this didnt take into account that women are just as wide ranged as men are in tastes. the majority of women out there may like a muscle clad man whose in top shape just as much as the majority of men out there want model figured women but theres people on both sides of that wall who dont fall in with the majority. maybe you should do some research past just sub cultures of porn cause if you havent noticed there really isnt porn for women so whose to say what kind of men youd see if there was!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/15/womens-physical-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-73058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lindsay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 07:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=123#comment-73058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a chubby chaser. My favorite physique admittedly has broad shoulders--as I don&#039;t like wide hips on men--but typically the guy is 200-300 lbs and about 5&#039;6&quot; to 5&#039;10&quot;. Oh, and hairy. Like year round sweater style. The only issue I have with the bigger men is the bigger man boobs. I like small breasts on both men and women. Flat isn&#039;t wanted, but hanging is unattractive to me. I don&#039;t like when women&#039;s boobs hang (I really do like small boobs), so I think that&#039;s a good indicator of how I&#039;d like men&#039;s boobs to be. Anyhow, I DO understand that my preference isn&#039;t the norm, but I&#039;m not the norm, so this is a non-issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a chubby chaser. My favorite physique admittedly has broad shoulders&#8211;as I don&#8217;t like wide hips on men&#8211;but typically the guy is 200-300 lbs and about 5&#8217;6&#8243; to 5&#8217;10&#8221;. Oh, and hairy. Like year round sweater style. The only issue I have with the bigger men is the bigger man boobs. I like small breasts on both men and women. Flat isn&#8217;t wanted, but hanging is unattractive to me. I don&#8217;t like when women&#8217;s boobs hang (I really do like small boobs), so I think that&#8217;s a good indicator of how I&#8217;d like men&#8217;s boobs to be. Anyhow, I DO understand that my preference isn&#8217;t the norm, but I&#8217;m not the norm, so this is a non-issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John D</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/15/womens-physical-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-53499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 18:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=123#comment-53499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read the first few paragraphs of the first link. Your arguments are very well laid out and either evidence based or reasoning based.

I&#039;ve tripped over citizen renegade&#039;s page here and there and mostly find it informative, but off the cuff I would say your writing seems a little more professional.

I also don&#039;t see the hordes of (possible) future Elliot Rodger virgins in mama&#039;s basement who seem to have a mad-on against women posting in your comments either.

Not that I give a shit about women&#039;s feelings, but that shit gets old fast.

I will keep your page on my list of pages to check in on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the first few paragraphs of the first link. Your arguments are very well laid out and either evidence based or reasoning based.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tripped over citizen renegade&#8217;s page here and there and mostly find it informative, but off the cuff I would say your writing seems a little more professional.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t see the hordes of (possible) future Elliot Rodger virgins in mama&#8217;s basement who seem to have a mad-on against women posting in your comments either.</p>
<p>Not that I give a shit about women&#8217;s feelings, but that shit gets old fast.</p>
<p>I will keep your page on my list of pages to check in on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rollo Tomassi</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/15/womens-physical-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-53475</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rollo Tomassi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 15:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=123#comment-53475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@John D, you should really join the comment thread here:
http://therationalmale.com/2014/09/01/the-myth-of-the-good-guy/#comments

But before you do, read these posts:
http://therationalmale.com/2012/02/23/looks-count/

http://therationalmale.com/2012/04/13/have-a-look/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John D, you should really join the comment thread here:<br />
<a href="http://therationalmale.com/2014/09/01/the-myth-of-the-good-guy/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://therationalmale.com/2014/09/01/the-myth-of-the-good-guy/#comments</a></p>
<p>But before you do, read these posts:<br />
<a href="http://therationalmale.com/2012/02/23/looks-count/" rel="nofollow">http://therationalmale.com/2012/02/23/looks-count/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://therationalmale.com/2012/04/13/have-a-look/" rel="nofollow">http://therationalmale.com/2012/04/13/have-a-look/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John D</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/15/womens-physical-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-53473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 14:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=123#comment-53473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this article makes several good points. But, I have to play devil&#039;s advocate here. I see several people using PUA terminology.

Isn&#039;t the whole PUA theory based on the concept that women will set aside their physical list for a smooth charming slick willy?

While there is greater range of men&#039;s desires in types of female bodies, in my opinion women are more quick to set aside their preferences.

It just doesn&#039;t work for men the same way as for women. (Virtually) no amount of kindness/loyalty/humor = boner for men, if the looks of the women didn&#039;t give him one to begin with.

But, it certainly does seem to apply to women that smooth charming slick willy = wet pussy even if the guy is a short troll.

So, women don&#039;t have the option of setting aside men&#039;s physical preference with charm, confidence and humor the way a man does when approaching a woman.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this article makes several good points. But, I have to play devil&#8217;s advocate here. I see several people using PUA terminology.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t the whole PUA theory based on the concept that women will set aside their physical list for a smooth charming slick willy?</p>
<p>While there is greater range of men&#8217;s desires in types of female bodies, in my opinion women are more quick to set aside their preferences.</p>
<p>It just doesn&#8217;t work for men the same way as for women. (Virtually) no amount of kindness/loyalty/humor = boner for men, if the looks of the women didn&#8217;t give him one to begin with.</p>
<p>But, it certainly does seem to apply to women that smooth charming slick willy = wet pussy even if the guy is a short troll.</p>
<p>So, women don&#8217;t have the option of setting aside men&#8217;s physical preference with charm, confidence and humor the way a man does when approaching a woman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Myth of the &#8216;Good&#8217; Guy &#124;</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/15/womens-physical-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-52905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Myth of the &#8216;Good&#8217; Guy &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=123#comment-52905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The confusion that most Beta men make is presuming that what women list as being necessarily &#8216;attractive&#8217; IS what makes him &#8216;arousing&#8217;. So when he models himself (often over the course of a lifetime) to personally identify with this checklist of attractive prerequisites he&#8217;s often frustrated and angered when all of that personal development makes for little difference when a woman opts to regularly fuck men of a better physical standard. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The confusion that most Beta men make is presuming that what women list as being necessarily &#8216;attractive&#8217; IS what makes him &#8216;arousing&#8217;. So when he models himself (often over the course of a lifetime) to personally identify with this checklist of attractive prerequisites he&#8217;s often frustrated and angered when all of that personal development makes for little difference when a woman opts to regularly fuck men of a better physical standard. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimberly</title>
		<link>http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/15/womens-physical-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-38282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kimberly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 21:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/?p=123#comment-38282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps media and other visual outlets have portrayed the supposed ideal female appearance way WAY too much. With typical slender bodies, symmetrical faces, perky breasts, and perhaps a little height with long hair being the norm...my god that can get boring. I see that ideal everday, and as a woman who is proud of her body, I&#039;m quite glad I don&#039;t fit in with that stereotype.  Now I can&#039;t really speak from a man&#039;s perspective, but because I am open-minded I would be inclined to search for other options regarding the female and her body as visual stimuli.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps media and other visual outlets have portrayed the supposed ideal female appearance way WAY too much. With typical slender bodies, symmetrical faces, perky breasts, and perhaps a little height with long hair being the norm&#8230;my god that can get boring. I see that ideal everday, and as a woman who is proud of her body, I&#8217;m quite glad I don&#8217;t fit in with that stereotype.  Now I can&#8217;t really speak from a man&#8217;s perspective, but because I am open-minded I would be inclined to search for other options regarding the female and her body as visual stimuli.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
